The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-28-2020 - Agenda PacketPage �M MEDINA, WASHINGTON www.medina-wa.gov PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA MEDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tuesday, January 28, 2020 6:00 PM AGENDA David Langworthy, Mark Nelson, Laurel Preston, Mike Raskin, Randy Reeves, Shawn Schubring and Jenny Smith 3-4 1. Election of the 2020 Chair and Vice Chair Staff/Commissioners 5-7 2. Planning Commission 2020 Work Plan 8-9 1. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 19, 2019 Recommendation: Adopt. Staff Contact: Kristin McKenna, Development Services Coordinator At this time, citizens may address the Planning Commission regarding any issue related to Planning Commission business, excluding public hearings. To ensure equal opportunity for the public to comment, a speaker's comments may be limit to three minutes per person, per meeting. None. 10 - 17 1. Subject: Pitched roof height bonus Recommendation: Discussion item only. Staff Contact: Stephanie Keyser, AICP, Planning Manager Page 1 of 17 Page Next regular meeting: February 25, 2020 Planning Commission meetings are held on the 4th Tuesday of the month at 6pm, unless otherwise specified. 2020 MEETINGS January 28 Regular Meeting February 25 Regular Meeting March 24 Regular Meeting April 28 Regular Meeting Cancelled April Special Meeting TBD May 26 Joint PC/CC Meeting/Study Session June 23 Regular Meeting July 28 Regular Meeting Cancelled July Special Meeting TBD August 25 Regular Meeting September 22 Regular Meeting October 27 Regular Meeting November 24 Regular Meeting Cancelled November Special Meeting TBD December 22 Regular Meeting Cancelled December Special Meeting TBD Page 2 of 17 AGENDA ITEM 2.1 CITY OF MEDINA 501 EVERGREEN POINT ROAD I PO BOX 144 1 MEDINA WA 98039-0144 �4 - TELEPHONE 425-233-6400 1 www.mectina-wa.gov MEMORANDUM DATE: January 28, 2020 TO: Medina Planning Commission FROM: Stephanie Keyser, AICP, Planning Manager RE: Opening the Meeting and Electing the 2020 Chair and Vice Chair Every January, the Planning Commission elects a chair to preside over the meeting and a vice chair to preside over the meeting in the absence of the chair. Staff recommends using the process set forth below, which is based on parliamentary procedural rules. Opening the Meeting Development Services Coordinator, Kristin McKenna, will call the Planning Commission meeting to order as the neutral party. Roll Call Ms. McKenna will follow with roll call. Election of Chair Ms. McKenna will call for nominations for the Chair. Any Commissioner may nominate him or herself or a fellow Commissioner. No second is required. Commissioners may decline their nomination if desired. When all nominations have been received, the nomination period shall be closed. Nominees and nominators may make a brief statement in support of their nominations before the period is closed. Nominees will be voted on in the order in which they were nominated. Once a nominee has received a majority vote, they will be declared the Chair. Once elected, the new Chair will move into his/her new seat at the head of the dais. Election of Vice Chair The newly elected Chair will take over the call for nominations for Vice Chair. Any Commissioner may nominate him or herself or a fellow Commissioner. No second is required. Commissioners may decline their nomination if desired. When all nominations have been received, the Chair shall close the nomination period. Election of the 2020 Chair and Vice Chair Page 3 of 17 AGENDA ITEM 2.1 Nominees and nominators may make a brief statement in support of their nominations before the period is closed. The Chair will call for a vote beginning with the first nominee. Once a nominee has received a majority vote, they will be declared the Vice Chair. Once elected, the new Vice Chair will move into his/her new seat. Election of the 2020 Chair and Vice Chair Page 4 of 17 iv c� 0 3 D c 0 N O N O 0 77 sv AGENDA ITEM 3.2 100 OVERVIEW TASK ORIGIN/RANKING Complete Start Staff/ Begin 2021 2021 End POLICIES, PLANS &REGULATIONS City -initiated Comprehensive Plan Update (WA law) Next update due 2023 Periodic review of Shoreline Master Program (WA law) Staff/ Begin 2025 2025 Next update due 2027 MISC CODE AMENDMENTS /ANALYSIS Review residential development policy re: bulk, second floor setback PC, CC/ 1 June 2019 Review Floor Area Ratio/minimum landscaping requirements Staff/ 2 October 2019 Look at critical areas PC, CC/ 5 Analysis and strategic review of commuter parking PC, CC/ 6 ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP/SUSTAINABILITY Canopy Assessment/Tree Code Amendments PC, CC/ 3 Spring 2020 Sustainability Regulations Staff, PC, CC/ 4 Item Description Requests to Staff Outside experts/ Deliverable consultants needed City -initiated Comprehensive This task involves undertaking a broad review of the Plan Update (WA law) Comprehensive Plan to determine if the goals and policies still reflect community values and to incorporate streetscape amendments developed in 2012. Periodic review of Shoreline This task involves updating the shoreline master program, which Master Program manages shoreline resources and development in Medina, to comply with the Shoreline Management Act, State shoreline master program guidelines, and best practices for shoreline protection. Update to ensure consistency between the shoreline Imaster program and the rest of the Medina Code. Bulk Regulations Future Tasks - Set Deadline Timing and budget notes: AGENDA ITEM 3.2 Staff: Anticipated start will be in 2021 for the 2023 Yes The initial deliverable would be a priority list of the Next mandated update will deadline. goals and policies that should be updated. After be due in 2023. Suggested delivery of the initial output, CC and PC would anticipated start date will collaboratively agree on next steps, which may include be in 2021. community workshops. Staff: Anticipated start will be in 2025 for the 2027 Yes IUpdate SMP to be compliant with changes in the laws, Next mandated update will deadline. rules and applicable updated guidance that has been be due in 2027. Suggested I adopted between 2019 and 2025. start date will be in 2025. Current Working Tasks 1. Review residential This is a topic that came out of the May 2018 Joint Study Session Staff: The first step will be an analysis of best practices No development policy re: with a suggestion to review the Mercer Island policy. This is a and surrounding cities (namely Mercer Island's) policies second story setback topic that has been combined with task #2. Both bulk topics will regarding a second story being set back or a daylight require multiple public particiapation sessions, including public plane being implemented. hearings, open houses, and community roundtable discussions. 2. Review Floor Area 4This task involves review of best practices in region regarding lot Staff: The first step will be an analysis of best practices Ratio/minimum landscaping coverage, building bulk, etc. Consider whether to change from of surrounding cities to determine whether the requirements structural coverage standard to Floor Area Ratio standard, or perhaps some combination of the two. This would incorporate 2016 work item looking at structural coverage based on height. structural coverage should remain, a change to FAR should be pursued, or if some hybrid of the two could be implemented. INo 1 The initial deliverable from PC to CC would be high-level Many months recommendations. CC, in consultation with PC, would then set next steps in developing detailed Code provisions. The initial deliverable from PC to CC would be high-level Many months recommendations. CC, in consultation with PC, would then set next steps in developing detailed Code provisions. v 5' c� 0 3 3 (n' 0' N O N CO 0 N ENVIRONMENT I Tree Canopy Regulations 3. Canopy Assessment/Tree The City's tree canopy continues to be a primary feature of Code Amendments Medina. This task will evaluate how the current tree code is working, and whether there are revisions that would be appropriate in order to better protect the City's tree canopy while increasing ease of use/calculation for residents and providing more certainty for the development community.This task probably requires a tree canopy assessment. Tree canopy assessments provide communities with a sense of the geographic shape and overall health of the tree canopy, and trends in tree canopies over time. This task may involve a review of best practices, and should consider whether Medina can leverage the recent tree -canopy data and work from Hunts Point. Also, include completion of urban forestry management manual (and consider leveraging Clyde Hill UFM manual). Included in the UFM manual would be best building/design practices for the city. Sustainability Regulations Subsequent Tasks Staff: The first step will be a tree canopy assessment conducted by a consultant. AGENDA ITEM 3.2 sed on assessment of tree canopy, deliver to CC, in Dependent on available t or outline form, preliminary recommendations, money for consultant rich would be used by CC, in consultation with PC, to t next steps in developing detailed Code provisions. so, make recommendation to CC re urban forestry 3nagement manual. 4. Sustainability Regulations This task involves a review of best practices across the region in Staff: This would involve a comparative analysis of the No The initial deliverable from PC to CC would be high-level A couple of months (includes establishing green building codes and other Sustainability current Comp Plan with the City Code to see where recommendations that Medina should pursue. That list public outreach) standards, and a recommendation on which would be incentives and best practices can be implementedwould be used by CC, in consultation with PC, to set appropriate for Medina, in order to ensure more Does the current code encourage things like solar next steps in developing detailed Code provisions. environmentally -sound development in Medina and support panels and remodeling an existing house or does it local government climate and sustainability actions. This would actually encourage demolishing/rebuilding? involve public outreach, public hearings, open houses, etc. MISC. 5. Look at critical areas This would be a review of the critical areas sections of the code. Staff: This would invovle a review of the critical areas, Yes I This would include a look at what other cities do and the best both as the physical area and how the ordinance is practices that are available for these areas. working. 6. Analysis and strategic This would be a review of the impacts that the commuter Staff: The analysis would involve establishing a Yes review of commuter parking parking has on the surrounding properties, specifically going on potentially impacted buffer and conducting the a block -by -block view to see what/if any impacts the analysis inside of that buffer over multiple days and neighborhoods are experiencing as a result of the increase in multiple times of day. vehicle traffic. The initial deliverable would be an analysis of how the This would be dependent current critical areas ordinance is working and whether upon available funds to hire changes need to be made to it. a consultant The initial deliverable would be a report outlining the This would be dependent impacts that commuter parking is having on the upon available funds to hire surrounding neighborhoods and possible mitigation a consultant measures the city could take (i.e. neighborhood permit parking requirements?) DRAFT AGENDA ITEM 4.1 MEDINA, WASHINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES MEDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tuesday, November 19, 2019 4:00 PM MINUTES The Planning Commission special meeting of November 19, 2019 was called to order at 4:10 p.m. by Vice -Chair Reeves Commissioners Present: Nelson (arrived 5:OOpm), Langworthy, Preston, Raskin, Reeves, Schubring (arrived 4:15pm) Commissioners Absent: Smith Staff Present: Keyser and McKenna Keyser made the following announcements: • City Council is hosting their annual employee and volunteer appreciation luncheon at Overlake Golf & Country Club Tuesday December 3rd at 12:00 pm. • Provided alternative dates/times to hold a special meeting due to the December Planning Commission meeting falling on a holiday week. ACTION: By consensus, the Commissioners elected not to hold a regular or special meeting in December. 1. Minutes from the October 22, 2019 regular meeting. ACTION: Motion Langworthy second Reeves. Approved 5-0 (Nelson not present) None Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 19, 2019 Page 8 of 17 DRAFT AGENDA ITEM 4.1 Subject: Minor Text Amendments a) Photovoltaic Panels ACTION: Motion Reeves second Langworthy to approve Minor Text Amendments, as presented, to Photovoltaic Panels, and forward to City Council for public hearing. Approved 5-0 Subject: Regulating Bulk Keyser made a presentation continuing the discussion on Regulating Bulk, focusing on proposes incentives relating to structures on lots within the R-16 zone. The Commissioners provided input and asked questions. Keyser responded. ACTION: Keyser will bring visual examples showing structures using existing code and structures using proposed code incentives, on various lot sizes, to the next scheduled Planning Commission meeting. ►1"e " Motion Nelson second Preston; the Commission adjourned the special meeting at 5:08 p.m. Minutes taken by: Kristin McKenna Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 19, 2019 Page 9 of 17 AGENDA ITEM 7.1 CITY OF MEDINA 501 EVERGREEN POINT ROAD I PO BOX 144 1 MEDINA WA 98039-0144 TELEPHONE 425-233-6400 1 www.medina-wa.gov MEMORANDUM DATE: January 28, 2020 TO: Medina Planning Commission FROM: Stephanie Keyser, AICP, Planning Manager RE: Pitched Roof Height Bonus For more than ten years, Council has sought a way to encourage pitched roofs. This desire stems from the impact boxed -style houses create on neighborhoods: looking out your window at a 25-foot flat wall can feel imposing, whereas a pitched roof offers some modulation from eaves and shorter wall height. Other cities have tried to encourage this design element with the implementation of the daylight plan/45° angle, by allowing additional height for a pitched roof, or implementing different height standards for flat and pitched roofs. In discussing this topic over several meeting, Planning Commission has agreed to look more closely at taking an incentive approach to pitched roofs instead of mandating them. Option 1: Pitched Roof — Structural Bonus Summary: This option would grant additional structural bonus to the first floor of a residence if a pitched roof was used under the current maximum zoning height (25 ft./28 ft.) As we have previously discussed, bulk is informed by both quantitative aspects of a structure's volume and the qualitative aspects of proportion, scale and massing. The first proposal would allow an additional structural bonus if a pitched roof was used. Any allowance that increases the volume of a structure is going to be controversial. The argument will be, if we're trying to reduce bulk's impact, why are we permitting a structure's size to be increased? While it is true that yes, this option would grant additional square feet, the suggestion is to limit that addition to the first floor. The comparatively smaller upper floor, the pitched roof and eaves all help lessen the perception of bulk. It should also be noted that both Option 1 and Option 2 would allow the placement of the second floor in any configuration: it could lend itself to a "wedding cake" style, it could result in a second -floor step -back from the front yard, or it could result in a second -floor step -back from the rear. Proposed language: Lots located within the R-16 zone are allowed an additional two (2) percent structural coverage provided: 1. The primary single-family dwelling has a minimum roof pitch of 4:12; and 2. The two percent is applied to the portion of the primary single-family dwelling that does not exceed fifteen (I5) feet above the lowest point of original grade. Subject : Pitched roof height bonus Page 10 of 17 AGENDA ITEM 7.1 The following table explores what impact this change would have on the square footage per floor. It should be noted that this bonus would not grant relief from setbacks. A spot check was done on the smallest lots in the R-16 zone to see if they would be able to accommodate the additional square footage within the buildable area (lot dimensions - setbacks). Each of the lots that were checked would be able to utilize this option. Going forward, if it is decided this is the option to pursue, a more thorough analysis of each substandard lot within the R-16 zone will be done. Upon review of corner lots, it was found that corner lots that are less than 10,000 square feet were unable to utilize the bonus due to the code requirements of having two front yard setbacks, a rear yard setback and one side yard setback. For these corner lots, the code allows a reduction in one of the front yard setbacks to 20-feet if the other is 30-feet. This is irrelevant for lots less than 10,000 square feet because both the regular option and the corner lot relief option result in a setback reduction for the two front and one rear setback of 75 feet (relief option: 30 front + 20 front + 25 rear = 75; regular code option: 25 front + 25 front + 25 rear = 75). An option always available would be for a property owner to request a non - administrative variance to be able to utilize this bonus. However, as this is decided by the Hearing Examiner, staff is unable to guarantee that the variance would be approved. For the sake of discussion, 2.5 and 3 percent bonuses are also included in the table. The question to consider is at what percentage would this incentive motivate a homeowner? C ' I I i Additional First Second Additional First Second Additional First Second Sq. Ft. Floor Floor Sq. Ft. Floor Floor Sq. Ft. Floor Floor 200 2,600 2,400 240 2,640 2,400 225 2,925 2,700 270 2,970 2,700 250 3,250 3,000 300 3,300 3,000 275 3,783.7 3,208.7 330 3,538.7 3,208.7 300 3,699.6 3,399.6 360 3,759.6 3,399.6 325 3,900 3,575 390 3,965 3,575 350 4,083.8 3,733.8 420 4,153.8 3,733.8 375 4,249.5 3,874.5 450 4,324.5 3,874.5 400 4,400 4,000 480 4,480 4,000 8,000 30% 160 2,560 2,400 AGENDA ITEM 7.1 Option 2: Pitched Roof — Additional Height Bonus Summary: This option would grant an additional five feet on top of the maximum zoning height (25 ft./28 ft.). if a pitched roof is used and the second floor structural coverage is reduced to 80% of the first floor In the Medina Municipal Code (MMC), lots in the R-20 and R-30 zoning district are eligible for an additional height bonus of 30 feet from the high point of original grade or 36 feet from the low point of original grade if the structural coverage is reduced to 13% of the lot. Typically with development regulation incentives, there's a tradeoff as demonstrated by the above example. When we talk about the possibility of granting an additional five feet, yes that might encourage more pitched roofs, however it will also negatively contribute to both the perception and actual bulk of new construction, which is something Council wants to avoid. At the same time, the area that we are focusing on for this allowance, the R-16 zoning district, has 12 lots that are 8,000 square feet or less, 138 lots that are 10,000 square feet or less, and 387 lots that are less than 16,000 square feet. A significant reduction in structural coverage in exchange for five additional feet does not seem to be a reasonable solution, especially for the smallest of lots in Medina. In order to maximize the building envelope, it is often the case that one floor is placed directly on top of another floor, thereby creating a sense of volume and bulk that too often overwhelms adjacent structures. To offset an increase in additional height but not perpetuate more boxes, it is proposed that the second floor be reduced to 80% of the first floor. Proposed language: Lots within the R-16 zone are allowed an additional five (5) feet above the maximum height otherwise allowed on the lot provided: 1. A minimum 4:12 pitch is used, and 2. The maximum structural coverage of any floor above the first is limited to 80% of the first floor. We often talk about the structural coverage or square footage and the maximum height as separate elements of the whole, however for the purpose of this analysis, let us consider the entire building's development capacity. The maximum building capacity for a site is determined by multiplying the square footage of the structural coverage by the maximum zoning height and subtracting setbacks and areas that are unbuildable due to environmental constraints. In the examples below, different floor heights are used (15110 and 12.5/12.5) as well as a maximum building height of 25-feet. Utilizing a reduced second floor model, the following examples explore the possible impacts of this provision to development capacity on 8,000, 10,000, 12,000, and 14,000 square foot lots. The examples show what the development capacity would be as -of -right and if a box -style structure were constructed, the development capacity of a house with a 15-foot first floor and 10-foot second floor, and finally a house constructed with equal 12.5-foot floors. What results is for a structure with a 15-foot first floor, the reduction in the second floor (80% of the first) can be recaptured by the additional height, which would not diminish the development capacity. However, if each floor is 12.5 feet high, the development capacity is reduced. Subject : Pitched roof height bonus Page 12 of 17 Example 1: Given: Lot Area = 8,000 square feet Lot Dimensions = 80' x 100'— Permitted Structural Coverage = 30% of the lot, or 2,400 Maximum Height = 25' from o.g. Setbacks = 25' front; 25' rear' 10' each side Buildable Area (lot dimensions — setbacks) = 60' x 40' Allowable development capacity (volume) _ (2400 x 25) = 60,000 ft3 Bonus Pitched Roof Height = 5' First Floor Structural Coverage = 2,400 Second Floor Coverage (80% Maximum of First) = 1,920 Buildable Area: First Floor = 60' x 40' Second Floor = 48' x 40' Wall Height: First Floor = 15' Second Floor = 10' AGENDA ITEM 7.1 60,000 ft3 30'— ----- -- — — — — — 19,200 fd 36,000 W Total New Volume = 36,000 (2400*15) + 19,200 (1920*10) + 4,800 (1/2(48*40*5)) 60,000 ft3 = No reduction in development capacity Bonus Pitched Roof Height = 5' First Floor Structural Coverage = 2,400 Second Floor Coverage (80% Maximum of First) = 1,920 Buildable Area: First Floor = 60' x 40' Second Floor = 48' x 40' Wall Height: First Floor = 12.5' Second Floor = 12.5' 30,— — — — — — — — — — — — —— 2,000 ft3 --- 30,000 ft.3 Total New Volume = 30,000 (2400* 12.5) + 24,000 (1920* 12.5) + 4,800 (1/2(48*40*5)) 58,800 ft3 = Reduction in development capacity by 1,200 ft3 Example 2: Given: Lot Area = 10,000 square feet Lot Dimensions = 80' x 125' Permitted Structural Coverage = 30% of the lot, or 3,000'— Maximum Height = 25' from o.g. Setbacks = 25' front; 25' rear' 10' each side 75,000 ft3 Buildable Area (lot dimensions — setbacks) = 60' x 75' Allowable Volume = (3000 x 25) = 75,000 ft3 Subject : Pitched roof height bonus Page 13 of 17 Bonus Pitched Roof Height = 5' First Floor Structural Coverage = 3,000 30'— Second Floor Coverage (80% Maximum of First) = 2,400$._ Buildable Area: First Floor = 50' x 60' Second Floor = 40' x 60' 15'_ Wall Height: First Floor = 15' Second Floor =10' AGENDA ITEM 7.1 — 27,000 f't� ---- 5,000 IV Total New Volume = 45,000 (3000* 15) + 24,000 (2400* 10) + 6,000 (1/2(40*60*5)) 75,000 ft3 = No reduction in development capacity Bonus Pitched Roof Height = 5' First Floor Structural Coverage = 3,000 Second Floor Coverage (80% Maximum of First) = 2,400}— --- — — — — Buildable Area: First Floor = 50' x 60' j30,000 ft3 Second Floor = 40' x 60' 12 Wall Height: First Floor = 12.5' 37,500 ft-3 Second Floor = 12.5' Total New Volume = 37,500 (3000* 12.5) + 30,000 (2400* 12.5) + 6,000 (1/2(40*60*5)) 73,500 ft3 = Reduction in development capacity by 1,500 ft3 Example 3: Given: Lot Area = 12,000 square feet Lot Dimensions = 100' x 120' Permitted Structural Coverage = 28.33% of the lot, or 3,400 (3,399.6) Maximum Height = 25' from o.g. Setbacks = 26' front; 26' rear' 10' each side Buildable Area (lot dimensions — setbacks) = 80' x 68' 1750 Allowable Volume = (3,400 x 25) = 85,000 ft3 I 55,000 ft3 Bonus Pitched Roof Height = 5' 30, — — — — — — — -------- First Floor Structural Coverage = 3,400 Second Floor Coverage (80% Maximum of First) = 2,720}— — — — --- — Buildable Area: First Floor = 50' x 68' 27,200 fO Second Floor = 42.5' x 64' Wall Height: First Floor = 15' 51,000 fits Second Floor = 10' Total New Volume = 51,000 (3400* 15) + 27,200 (2720* 10) + 6,800 (1/2(42.5*64*5)) 85,000 ft3 = No reduction in development capacity Subject : Pitched roof height bonus Page 14 of 17 AGENDA ITEM 7.1 Bonus Pitched Roof Height = 5' 3,0'- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - First Floor Structural Coverage = 3,400 35'_ _ ___ _ _ Second Floor Coverage (80% Maximum of First) = 2,720 34,000 ft3 Buildable Area: First Floor = 50' x 68' 1-�= - - - - - - Second Floor = 42.5' x 64' 42,500 ft-3 Wall Height: First Floor = 12.5' Second Floor =12.5' Total New Volume = 42,500 (3400* 12.5) + 34,000 (3400* 12.5) + 6,800 (1/2(42.5*64*5)) 83,300 ft3 = Reduction in development capacity by 1,700 ft3 Example 5: Given: Lot Area = 14,000 square feet Lot Dimensions = 100' x 160' Permitted Structural Coverage = 25% of the lot, or 4,000 Maximum Height = 25' from o.g.�- - - Setbacks = 30' front; 30' rear' 10' each side Buildable Area (lot dimensions - setbacks) = 80' x 100' Allowable Volume = (4,000 x 25) = 100,000 ft3 Bonus Pitched Roof Height = 5' 30,_ First Floor Structural Coverage = 4,000 Second Floor Coverage (80% Maximum of First) = 3,200 25:_ Buildable Area: First Floor = 50' x 80' 15'_ Second Floor = 40' x 80' Wall Height: First Floor = 15' Second Floor =10' 100,000 ft3 32,000 W 60,000 ft3 Total New Volume = 60,000 (4000* 15) + 32,000 (3200* 10) + 8,000 (1/2(40*80*5)) 100,000 ft3 = No reduction in development capacity Bonus Pitched Roof Height = 5' First Floor Structural Coverage = 4,000 341- Second Floor Coverage (80% Maximum of First) = 3,200 25-- Buildable Area: First Floor = 50' x 80' Second Floor = 40' x 80' 12-= Wall Height: First Floor = 12.5' Second Floor = 12.5' -------- ----- -- 40,000 W 50,000 ft3 Total New Volume = 50,000 (4000* 12.5) + 40,000 (3200* 12.5) + 8,000 (1/2(40*80*5)) 98,000 ft3 = Reduction in development capacity by 2,000 ft3 Subject : Pitched roof height bonus Page 15 of 17 Evergreen Medina Beach ParR city Lake Washington Exhibit B Fairweather Nauture- Town of Preserve / P&rkjl I � Hunts Point ITTIC"1111T I City of Medina Official Zoning Map Ordinance No.907 Passed by the City Council on the 12th day of May, 2014 Amended by Ordinance No. 961 Effective Date: July 9th, 2018 Bellevue Christian Schoo %IT : 7- T L- ---------- 7' - L_L_L__ :r-- Town of 7 17-T-1 Clyde Hill PSE I i Legend Wells Medina SR 520 Nursery L IT: :r r — -- — -- City Limits Lake Washington L TI L: Parcel Data 2013 L I L L Official Zoning Districts NA (Neighborhood Auto Servicing) Ij Public (Parks and Public Spaces) R-16 (Single Family Residence) R-20 (Single Family Residence) Overlal�e Golf & Country R-30 (Single Family Residence) SR-30 (Suburban Gardening Residential) 1 it 7fU State ROW Zoning Overlay Districts NCPD (Neighborhood Character Preservation District) L PLUD (Planned Land Use Development) St. Thomas I LL_ I L 1 1 1 Church/School li _LL _L F --- VIF 71 \,Medina Park L --7T- 7_1 SE P J_j 77 F City of Bellevue F M!!Ti T Tt F : MEL Medina Elementary / LT_ TTF FFF 41 7-- Dabney Point Q) < tJ Q) Groat Point Subject : Pitched roof height bonus Page 16 of 17 Af CITY OF MEDINA CRITICAL AREAS MAP AGENDA ITEM 7.1 ATTACHMENT - Fairweather town of Bay untFs Point Cozy Cove 2� / / I' 520 NF32ND ST W z ' a i Lary F_ / n � CO ` 1 w NE-28THT---L i NE 28TH ST V CIR - NE 27TH ST _�UJ LL� NE 26TH ST Z a, /r / W a / z W g` / a' r a0 NE 24TF1 ST J n a) h1l NE 22ND ST Ib ..- Lake Washington NE21STST LEI Q . - Clyde Hill —NE-t8TH-ST z J NE 16TH ST Point / E�erg-reen Road Stream W 9TH PL I/ 7r3 �. / �RD_AYE-NE NE 14TH ST v / / 0 0.125 0.25 i NE 12TH ST - NE 11 TH ST Miles MAP LEGEND / % _ Z W ,� .F 1 Oe _ :: ON W W NE 10TH ST ' Z Z ; CAO Stream 1 a Surface stream .P#.F— Underground piped 00 NE 8TH ST I 'N $ _ Z h City Of W Bellevue a m NWI Wetland (potential) NE 6TH ST 1 a J .>. _: Delineated Wetlands OGreat Blue Heron 4 � 4 — Bald Eagle Nest Buffer, +Urban Natural Open Space 4 �N � Meydenbauer 5 Erosion Hazard Area j/ 0 Bay - Moderate to High Liquefaction Susceptibility' City Boundary F� �o A� DATA SOURCE: City of Medina, King County GIs, National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), Puget Sound Lidar Consortium, Washington Department of NOTES: Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Washington Department of Natural Resources (WADNR), The Watershed Company. All features depicted on this map are approximates. They have not been formally delineated or surveyed and are intended for Data derived from City surface water maps/data of 1985 and 2013, and planning purposes only. A site -specific evaluation is required to stream typing maps of 1999. 2 NWI wetlands are derived from aerial imagery and have not been verified on confirm/ verify the presence of critical areas on a property. No site. warranty is expressed or implied. 3 Wetlands were delineated in 1992 and 2000. 4 THE Data provided by WDFW. 5 Data provided by King County GIs Center. DATE: 612412014 WATERSHED 2 6 Data provided by WADNR Divison of Geology and Earth Sciences, 2010. Subject : Pitched roof height bonus Page 17 of 17