HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-25-2025 - Agenda Packet
MEDINA, WASHINGTON
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Hybrid - Virtual/In-Person
Medina City Hall - Council Chambers
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039
Tuesday, March 25, 2025 – 6:00 PM
AGENDA
COMMISSION CHAIR | Laura Bustamante
COMMISSION VICE-CHAIR | Shawn Schubring
COMMISSIONERS | Julie Barrett, Li-Tan Hsu, Evonne Lai, Mark Nelson, Brian Pao
PLANNING MANAGER | Jonathan Kesler
DEPUTY CITY CLERK | Dawn Nations
Hybrid Meeting Participation
The Medina Planning Commission has moved to hybrid meetings, offering both in-person and
online meeting participation. Individuals who are participating online and wish to speak live can
register their request with the City Clerk at 425.233.6410 or email dnations@medina-wa.gov and
leave a message before 2PM on the day of the Planning Commission meeting. The Deputy City
Clerk will call on you by name or telephone number when it is your turn to speak. You will be
allotted 3 minutes for your comments and will be asked to stop when you reach the 3-minute limit.
The city will also accept written comments. Any written comments must be submitted by 2 PM on
the day of the Planning Commission meeting to the Deputy City Clerk at dnations@medina-
wa.gov.
Join Zoom Meeting
https://medina-wa.zoom.us/j/87516922321?pwd=aaba58tU23QvxSc9YCQmO45a4Ginrp.1
Meeting ID: 875 1692 2321
Passcode: 238533
One tap mobile
+12532158782,,87516922321# US (Tacoma)
1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Planning Commissioners Barrett, Bustamante, Hsu, Lai, Nelson, Pao, and Schubring
2. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
1
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3.1 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 28, 2025
Recommendation: Adopt Minutes.
Staff Contact: Dawn Nations, Deputy City Clerk
4. ANNOUNCEMENTS
4.1 Staff/Commissioners
5. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
Individuals wishing to speak live during the Virtual Planning Commission meeting will need
to register their request with the Deputy City Clerk, Dawn Nations, via email
(dnations@medina-wa.gov) or by leaving a message at 425.233.6410 by 2pm the day of
the Planning Commission meeting. Please reference Public Comments for the Planning
Commission meeting on your correspondence. The Deputy City Clerk will call on you by
name or telephone number when it is your turn to speak. You will be allotted 3 minutes for
your comment and will be asked to stop when you reach the 3-minute limit.
6. DISCUSSION
6.1 Concerns of the Commission
6.2 Review of Middle Housing Survey Results
Recommendation: Discussion.
Staff Contacts: Jonathan Kesler, AICP, Planning Manager and Kirsten Peterson, Senior
Project Manager, SCJ Alliance
Time Estimate: 45 minutes
6.3 Review of Remaining Tasks for Middle Housing
Recommendation: Discussion.
Staff Contact: Jonathan Kesler, AICP, Planning Manager
Time Estimate: 15 minutes
6.4 Review of the Middle Housing and Subdivision Ordinance Drafts
Recommendation: Discussion.
Staff Contacts: Dawn F. Reitan, Assistant City Attorney and Jonathan Kesler, AICP,
Planning Manager
Time Estimate: 60 minutes
7. ADJOURNMENT
Next Planning Commission Meeting: Tuesday, April 22, 2025, at 6:00 PM.
2
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Planning Commission meetings are held on the 4th Tuesday of the month at 6 PM, unless
otherwise specified.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need a disability-related modification
or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to participate in this meeting, please
contact the City Clerk’s Office at (425) 233-6410 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
UPCOMING MEETINGS
Tuesday, April 22, 2025 - Regular Meeting
Monday, May 26, 2025 - Memorial Day - City Hall Closed
Wednesday, May 28, 2025 (due to the holiday) - Regular Meeting
Thursday, June 19, 2025 - Juneteenth - City Hall Closed
Tuesday, June 24, 2025 - Regular Meeting
Friday, July 4, 2025 - Independence Day - City Hall Closed
Tuesday, July 22, 2025 - Regular Meeting
Tuesday, August 26, 2025 - Dark, No Meeting
Monday, September 1, 2025 - Labor Day - City Hall Closed
Tuesday, September 23, 2025 - Regular Meeting
Tuesday, October 28, 2025 - Regular Meeting
Tuesday, November 11, 2025 - Veterans Day - City Hall Closed
Tuesday, November 18, 2025 (3rd Tuesday) - Special Meeting
Thursday, November 27, 2025 - Thanksgiving Holiday - City Hall Closed
Friday, November 28, 2025 - Day After Thanksgiving Holiday - City Hall Closed
Tuesday, December 16, 2025 (3rd Tuesday) - Special Meeting
Thursday, December 25, 2025 - Christmas Day - City Hall Closed
3
MEDINA, WASHINGTON
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Hybrid-Virtual/In Person
Tuesday, January 28, 2025 – 6:00 PM
MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Planning Commission Chair Laura Bustamante called to order the meeting of the Medina
Planning Commission in the Council Chambers at 6:00pm
PRESENT
Commission Chair Laura Bustamante
Commission Vice-Chair Shawn Schubring
Commissioner Julie Barrett
Commissioner Li-Tan Hsu
Commissioner Evonne Lai
Commissioner Mark Nelson
ABSENT
Commissioner Brian Pao
STAFF
Abdulsalam, Bennett, Kesler, Peterson, Robertson, Wilcox
2. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Without objections, the meeting agenda was approved as presented.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3.1 Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes of January 16, 2025
Recommendation: Adopt minutes.
Staff Contact: Rebecca Bennett, Development Services Coordinator
ACTION: Motion to approve minutes. (Approved 6-0)
Motion made by Commissioner Nelson, Seconded by Commissioner Barrett.
Voting Yea: Commission Chair Bustamante, Commission Vice-Chair Schubring,
Commissioner Barrett, Commissioner Hsu, Commissioner Lai, Commissioner Nelson
4. ANNOUNCEMENTS
4.1 Staff/Commissioners
Chair Bustamante announcement that this will be Bennett's last Planning Commission
Meeting until she returns from maternity leave. Commissioner Nelson spoke about the
City Council meeting from the previous night and mentioned the changes that they made
to the Middle Housing Review code change draft. Chair Bustamante announced that City
4
AGENDA ITEM 3.1
Council approved the submission of the code change draft to the Department of
Commerce.
5. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
There was no public comment.
6. DISCUSSION
6.1 Concerns of the Commission
EDIT Discussion about council meeting from night before. Jonathan spoke, Peterson
spoke, Robertson spoke
6.2 Middle Housing Review
Recommendation: Discussion
Staff Contacts: Jonathan Kesler, AICP, Planning Manager; Kirsten Petersen, Senior
Project Manager, SCJ Alliance
Time Estimate: 30 minutes
Peterson spoke about the Middle Housing Review. Commissioners discussed and asked
questions.
6.3 Proposed Unit Lot Subdivision/Zero Lot Line Ordinance
Recommendation: Discussion
Staff Contacts: Jennifer S. Robertson, Esq., Inslee Best, Attorneys at Law
Time Estimate: 30 minutes
Robertson spoke about the Proposed Unit Lot Subdivision/Zero Lot Line Ordinance.
Commissioners discussed and asked questions.
6.4 Upcoming Topics in 2025
Recommendation: Discussion
Staff Contact: Jonathan Kesler, AICP, Planning Manager
Time Estimate: 30 minutes
Kesler gave a PowerPoint presentation on Upcoming Topics in 2025. Commissioners
discussed and asked questions.
7. ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting is the Regular Meeting on Tuesday, February 25, 2025, at 6:00
pm.
Meeting adjourned at 7:57pm.
ACTION: Motion to adjourn. (Approved 6-0)
Motion made by Commissioner Hsu, Seconded by Commissioner Barrett.
Voting Yea: Commission Chair Bustamante, Commission Vice-Chair Schubring,
Commissioner Barrett, Commissioner Hsu, Commissioner Lai, Commissioner Nelson
Meeting Minutes taken by Rebecca Bennett, Development Services Coordinator
5
AGENDA ITEM 3.1
Page 1 of 15
CITY OF MEDINA
501 EVERGREEN POINT ROAD | PO BOX 144 | MEDINA WA 98039-0144
TELEPHONE 425-233-6400 | www.medina-wa.gov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 25, 2025
TO: Medina Planning Commission
FROM: SCJ Alliance, Middle Housing Consultant and Jonathan G. Kesler,
AICP, Planning Manager
RE: Review of Middle Housing Survey Results
Community Engagement Summary
As the Planning Commission is aware, community engagement was an important
component of the middle housing project. On June 10, 2024, the City Council adopted
a Public Engagement Plan (PEP) via Resolution 444 . This plan was utilized as a guiding
document by City Staff and SCJ Alliance after they were brought on board.
SCJ Alliance prepared a plan for carrying out the objectives of the PEP. When materials
were ready to be shared with the public, a robust community engagement effort began
in earnest to solicit feedback about the middle housing updates from members of the
Medina community.
In addition to providing materials for posting on the City website, and producing
postcards, flyers and other materials for peer-to-peer engagement, two community
forums were held in January 2025. The purpose of the forums was to share information
with the public, allow for Q&A, and to encourage participation in a community survey.
Middle Housing Survey Results
The Medina Middle Housing Survey ended on Friday, February 14, 2025. At the
conclusion of the survey, 199 responses were received online. The completion rate
was 72.4%, with 144 surveys fully completed and 55 partially completed. F our paper
surveys were completed and submitted to City staff.
The survey consisted of 24 questions and was designed to provide information to the
public about middle housing and also allow for feedback on several topics. One goal
of the City Council was to ensure that the community had the opportunity to share their
ideas, concerns and general feedback regarding not only middle housing, but others of
concern for Medina.
The survey results dated February 18, 2025 are attached as Exhibit 1. The document
is 111 pages in length and contains various graphs and charts and also contains a great
number of responses to open-ended questions. A summary of it follows.
6
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 2 of 15
Medina Middle Housing
Community Survey Results
Question #1: Out of 195 respondents, 21% reported that they were very familiar with
the with the term “middle housing”, 48.7% reported that they were somewhat familiar,
16.4% indicated they were not sure, and 13.8% reported that they were not at all
familiar. Four (4) respondents skipped this question.
Question #2: When respondents were asked if they knew what housing types were
included in middle housing, 61.9% of respondents (120 individuals) reported that “yes”
they knew of the possible housing types this would entail. 18.6% respon ded with a
“maybe”, and 19.6% said “no”. Five (5) survey respondents skipped this question.
Question #3: This was an open-ended question allowing for a narrative response when
asking respondents about their initial reactions to the information that Med ina must
begin allowing for middle housing. The responses from the community members are
found on pages 7 through 19 of the attached survey results. The answers are extensive,
and it is recommended that the responses are read verbatim. However, for a
generalization of the responses an AI summary of the information identified the
following key themes:
1. Traffic and Infrastructure Concerns:
o Many residents express concerns about increased traffic and the
strain on Medina's infrastructure, which was designed for low-density
single-family homes. Increased density could exacerbate traffic
congestion and cause parking challenges, particularly with limited
space on the streets. Some worry about the potential need for costly
upgrades to roads and utilities to accommodate higher density.
2. Property Value and Aesthetic Concerns:
o There is concern that introducing middle housing will negatively impact
property values, especially as it may alter the character of
predominantly single-family neighborhoods. While some suggest that
middle housing might increase land values, others believe it could
reduce the desirability of single-family homes, which might lead to
higher property taxes and a loss of exclusivity. Aesthetic concerns are
also mentioned, with some residents worried about the disruption to
the visual harmony and charm of Medina.
3. Preservation of Community Character:
o Many residents value Medina's current serene, low-density
environment and are apprehensive about the potential loss of this
character with increased density. Some see middle housing as
inconsistent with the community’s identity and fear it will change the
quiet, small-town feel they cherish.
7
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 3 of 15
4. Concerns About Affordability:
o Some respondents express skepticism about whether middle housing
will achieve its goal of creating affordable housing. With high costs in
the area, it’s unclear whether these units will truly be affordable for
middle-income families or will be priced out of reach, ultimately
benefiting developers and raising property values rather than
addressing housing affordability.
5. Mixed Reactions to Legislation:
o While some residents acknowledge the need for more housing and
support the state's efforts to address the housing shortage, others are
strongly against the mandate, feeling that local planning should have
more influence. A few residents are open to middle housing in principle
but express concerns about how it’s implemented, particularly
regarding the scale of development, height, and setbacks to maintain
the neighborhood’s character.
6. Community Input and Solutions:
o Some residents propose the creation of a focus group to address the
potential impacts of middle housing. They suggest that Medina
collaborate with neighboring areas like Yarrow Point and Clyde Hill to
establish design guidelines and other measures to mitigate concerns
like noise, parking, and safety.
7. Polarized Opinions:
o The responses vary widely from strong opposition, with some
describing the legislation as an infringement on local rights and others
calling it an "un-democratic" imposition, to more moderate views that
express openness to carefully planned changes that respect the
community’s values.
Overall, there is a mix of support and strong resistance to the idea of middle
housing in Medina. Many residents are primarily concerned with preserving the
character of their community, maintaining low-density living, and mitigating the
potential negative impacts on property values and infrastructure.
Question #4: With this question, respondents were asked to rate their level of
concern over the impacts of middle housing legislation to Medina. The responses
are found on page 21 of the survey, but in general there were varying levels of
concern over each topic provided as a possible response. The topics that were
rated included property values, lighting, noise, parking, traffic, tree preservation, and
safety.
Question #5: This question allowed respondents to specify other concerns not
included in the ranking for question #4. Please refer to pages 22 through 26 for the
full results. The AI generated summary of the results noted a broad range of
concerns from residents about the potential impacts of increased development and
8
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 4 of 15
density in their neighborhood. Main themes from the responses were identified as
follows:
1. Neighborhood Character & Aesthetics
2. Privacy & Overcrowding
3. Infrastructure Strain
4. Property Values & Affordability
5. Traffic & Noise
6. Community & Social Impact
7. Development Process & Governance
8. Environmental & Utility Concerns
9. Miscellaneous Concerns
Overall, the responses suggest a strong desire to maintain the neighborhood’s
character, manage growth in a way that doesn ’t overwhelm infrastructure, and
protect residents’ quality of life.
Question #6: This question asked the respondents what thoughts or concerns
would arise if a neighbor were to redevelop for middle housing or add ADU’s.
Narrative responses are found on pages 28 through 38. The AI generated summary
of the key themes is as follows:
1. Traffic and Parking Issues: Many respondents are worried about increased
traffic congestion, limited parking availability, and safety concerns due to
more vehicles on streets not designed for high traffic volumes. Overflow
parking on streets and strain on local infrastructure were also common
concerns.
2. Impact on Property Values: A recurring concern is the potential decrease
in property values, especially in single-family neighborhoods. Some believe
the character of the neighborhood would be negatively affected by increased
density, while others fear the market might become less desirable.
3. Loss of Privacy and Neighborhood Character: Several people expressed
concerns about decreased privacy, particularly with new buildings being too
close to existing homes. There’s also worry that the neighborhood’s peaceful,
low-density character would be compromised, making it more urban and less
residential.
4. Noise and Safety: Increased noise from construction, additional families,
and potentially disruptive renters (e.g., short-term rentals like Airbnbs) is a
significant issue. Concerns about safety, especially related to increased
crime and lack of oversight, were also mentioned.
5. Aesthetic and Environmental Concerns: Respondents are worried about
the visual impact of new housing, including the destruction of trees and the
loss of the area’s natural beauty. They also expressed concern about the
architectural fit of new units within the existing neighborhood.
6. Setbacks, Building Codes, and Regulations: There’s a strong desire for
clear building regulations to preserve setbacks, lot coverage, and the overall
9
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 5 of 15
integrity of the neighborhood. Some respondents emphasized the importance
of enforcing building codes to maintain the area's quality and avoid
undesirable structures.
7. Impact on Community: Many residents value the sense of community and
fear that increased density would erode neighborhood bonds. Some
expressed concerns about transient renters, especially short-term renters,
undermining the neighborhood’s stability.
Overall, the responses reflect a deep concern about the impacts of middle
housing on Medina's residential character, privacy, safety, and property values,
with a particular focus on preserving the tranquility and aesthetics of the
neighborhood.
Question #7: This was a question related to the effects of the parking requirements
for middle housing. Narrative responses are found on pages 39 through 48. The AI
generated summary notes that the survey responses largely express concerns
about parking, particularly related to the potential for increased congestion and the
impact on neighborhood aesthetics and safety. Identified key themes are as follows:
1. Increased Traffic and Parking: Many respondents are worried that more
cars will be parked on the streets, leading to overcrowded and unsafe
conditions. Streets are already narrow or have limited parking, and adding
additional units could exacerbate these issues. Concerns about congestion,
especially in residential areas, are common.
2. Safety Concerns: Several respondents are concerned about the safety
implications of more cars on the streets, including traffic hazards, difficulty
navigating narrow streets, and potential issues with emergency vehicles
being unable to pass.
3. Negative Impact on Neighborhood Character: Many feel that increased
parking on the streets could change the quiet, residential character of the
neighborhood. The idea of streets being lined with cars, RVs, or other
vehicles is seen as detrimental to the neighborhood's charm and appeal.
4. Environmental and Drainage Issues: Some responses highlight concerns
about environmental impacts, such as increased hard surfaces that could
exacerbate drainage problems. The lack of adequate stormwater drainage is
mentioned as a potential consequence of increased parking space
requirements.
5. Regulation and Enforcement: There are also concerns about how parking
regulations will be enforced, particularly regarding on-street parking and
whether exceptions will be made for developers. Some respondents want
stricter enforcement to maintain a balance of parking availability and
neighborhood safety.
6. Support for Off-Street Parking: Many respondents emphasize the
importance of requiring adequate off-street parking for new developments,
particularly ADUs (Accessory Dwelling Units). The suggestion of enforcing a
minimum number of parking spots per unit is a recurring theme.
10
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 6 of 15
7. Uncertainty About the Future: Some respondents are uncertain or
confused about how changes in parking regulations will be implemented, and
whether new housing types will lead to enough parking spaces to
accommodate all residents.
In summary, while there is some support for additional housing, a significant
portion of respondents are concerned about the impact on parking, traffic flow,
safety, and the overall character of their neighborhoods. Many advocate for
strong regulations, off-street parking requirements, and effective enforcement to
mitigate these concerns.
Question #8: This question asked about support for adopting design guidelines for
all housing in Medina. Out of the 150 responses received, 33.3% were in strong
support, 22.7% slightly supported this, and 14.7% were neutral on the topic. 8.7%
were slightly opposed, while 20.7% were strongly opposed to adopting residential
design guidelines.
Question #9: This question asked respondents if the City should use middle
housing to achieve the State mandated affordability requirements. 60.7% of
respondents said no, 19.3% responded with a yes, and 20% were neutral (see pg.
52).
Question #10: As an information question, it was explained that the City will need
to update its zoning in order to meet regionally allocated affordability targets. When
asked to rank the possible options the answers from 141 respondents ranked
highest to lowest as follows (see page 54):
1 – Multifamily Zoning
2 – Middle housing with additional subsidies
3 – Other
4 – Tiny homes community
Question #11 asked for other ideas on how Medina can meet its affordable housing
targets. respondents gave written responses which can be found on pages 55
through 59. The responses to the survey question reflect a variety of opinions and
suggestions, with the AI generated summary as follows:
1. Support for Cohesive Development: Some respondents suggest creating
more cohesive, intentional designs with multiple homes built together, such
as duplexes or cottages, to integrate affordable housing into the community
in a way that fits in better. Others suggest focusing on tiny home communities
or cottage-style developments aimed at low-income seniors or city
employees.
2. Expansion of Housing Options: Ideas like converting existing homes into
duplexes, allowing for small condo buildings in designated areas, or building
housing on public or underused land (e.g., Medina Chevron or other sites)
were mentioned.
3. Opposition to Affordable Housing in Medina: A number of respondents
strongly oppose the concept, arguing that Medina's high land values make
11
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 7 of 15
affordable housing unfeasible, and that adding more housing would lead to a
loss of the city’s character. Many of these responses suggest pushing back
against state mandates, with some even advocating for lawsuits or ignoring
the requirements.
4. Support for ADUs: There is notable support for allowing Accessory Dwelling
Units (ADUs), with calls to prioritize them over other types of mul ti-unit
developments like townhouses and duplexes. However, many emphasize
that strict regulations on utilities and design should be enforced.
5. Concerns About Land Availability: Several people question the feasibility
of building affordable housing due to Medina’s limited land, suggesting that
repurposing existing spaces (such as vacant properties or commercial areas)
could be an option.
6. Economic and Tax Considerations: Responses also mention the need to
lower property taxes, cap realtor fees, or offer finan cial incentives to make
housing more affordable. There is a sense that without subsidies or
significant changes to economic structures, achieving affordable housing in
Medina will be very difficult.
7. Community Education and Mindset Shifts: A few responses stress the
importance of educating residents about the challenges of housing
affordability, suggesting a shift in mindset is needed to understand the needs
of low-income families, teachers, and other essential workers.
In summary, while some propose solutions such as ADUs, tiny homes, or specific
affordable housing developments, a significant portion of respondents are
opposed to the idea, seeing it as incompatible with Medina’s character and land
values. Others call for legal challenges or simply rejecting state mandates.
Question #12 asked respondents for areas in the city that would be most acceptable
for zoning changes to allow more opportunities for affordable housing. Responses
are found on pages 60 through 66. The AI generated summary of suggestions is as
follows:
1. Near SR 520 and Major Roads: Several responses suggest areas along or
near SR 520, such as:
o Medina Circle (84th Ave/520) for easy access to transit and minimal
impact on existing neighborhoods.
o The stretch from NE 24th to 520, especially between Evergreen Point
Rd and 84th Ave.
o Near the 520 bus station or police station.
o North of 24th St, south of 520, and near Bellevue Christian School.
o Near major arteries such as 84th Ave, 12th Street, or around Medina
Park for transit access.
2. Commercial or Underused Areas: Some responses suggest repurposing
commercial or less-developed spaces, including:
o Medina Chevron and the gas station area.
o The Medina Nursery or Wells Medina Nursery.
12
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 8 of 15
o The former middle school site or areas near the golf course.
3. North or East of Medina: Areas further from the city center, such as:
o The northern or eastern edges of the city, including NE 28th, NE 10th,
or near the Overlake Golf Course.
o Specific areas like north of 24th and around Medina Heights or along
Evergreen Point Rd.
o Southeast corners of Medina and near Fairweather Park.
4. Other Locations:
o Near schools like Bellevue Christian or Medina Elementary.
o Possible repurposing of vacant or large lots, such as Bellevue Christian
School or parts of the golf course.
o Areas close to existing condo units or parks, where infrastructure may
already be in place.
5. Opposition to Affordable Housing: Some responses firmly reject the idea
of affordable housing in Medina, suggesting it would disrupt the city’s
character or be too costly. Others suggest no suitable location e xists,
especially given the high land values.
6. General Recommendations: Many suggest focusing on locations with easy
access to transportation, while avoiding impact on existing residential areas.
Others recommend considering larger or underused lots for potential
developments.
In summary, the most common recommendations point to areas near SR 520,
Medina Circle, and the golf course, while several emphasize the importance of
minimizing impact on established neighborhoods. Many respondents also
suggest exploring repurposing commercial spaces, though there’s significant
opposition to adding affordable housing in the area.
Question #13: With this question, respondents were asked for ideas on how to
address the eventual impacts to parking and/or traffic resu lting from increased
number of vehicles on local streets. The responses are on pages 67 through 73.
Question #14 asked about strategies for reducing traffic stress to preserve safe
streets. The most support went toward utilizing traffic calming measures at 63.4%,
with 35.9% of respondents supportive of increasing the active transportation
network, and 31.3% in support of promoting or expanding public transportation.
32.1% responded with “other”. The ideas provided for the “other” category are found
on pages 75 through 77.
Question #15 provides a list of potential actions the city could take to address
possible changes in traffic patterns created by middle housing. Responses are
provided in two forms, with the graph on page 78, and a list format on pa ge 79.
Around 50% of the respondents indicated their support for protected walkways,
speed bumps, and wider walkways. Refer to the survey results for the remainder of
the responses.
13
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 9 of 15
Question #16 asked what concerns respondents had about traffic calming
measures, active transportation or public transit in Medina. Results are found on
pages 81 through 85. Key points generated by AI include:
1. Public Transportation:
o Many residents oppose expanding public transit in Medina, fearing it
could increase crime, disrupt the neighborhood's character, and
contribute to overcrowding. Some also believe there are insufficient
parking areas for buses and other transit options.
o A number of respondents specifically want to limit public transit routes
to certain streets (e.g., 84th Ave) and express concerns about
potential public transit stops causing unwanted activity or attracting
non-residents.
2. Traffic Calming Measures:
o Several residents are opposed to traffic calming measures like speed
bumps, roundabouts, and narrow streets, citing concerns about noise,
damage to vehicles, and difficulty for drivers, especially elderly
individuals or those with low cars.
o Speed bumps were particularly mentioned as being noisy and
ineffective, with some feeling they are more of a nuisance than a
solution to speeding.
o Residents also highlighted the negative impact of these measures on
driving experience, with many fearing they will make driving less
enjoyable.
3. Bicycles and Pedestrian Safety:
o Bicycle traffic, especially along certain roads like Evergreen Point
Road, was mentioned as a concern due to cyclists not following road
safety rules and riding too fast or inappropriately.
o Some respondents expressed a desire to address cyclist behavior
through measures like enforcing stop signs or pot entially adding
dedicated bike paths.
4. Traffic Congestion and School-related Issues:
o There were concerns about traffic congestion around schools,
particularly during pickup and drop-off times, which some believe
could worsen with an increase in housing or p opulation. Suggestions
included the use of police officers to manage traffic during peak times
and the consideration of one-way streets to alleviate congestion.
5. Road Safety and Enforcement:
o Many residents advocated for stronger enforcement of existing traf fic
laws, including speed limits and aggressive driving. They suggested
using speed cameras, increasing police presence, and issuing fines to
ensure compliance and improve safety.
o Some felt that aggressive driving, particularly by non-residents
passing through Medina, is a significant safety concern.
6. Construction Traffic:
o Residents are concerned about construction traffic, particularly large
vehicles, and its compatibility with Medina's narrow roads. Some
14
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 10 of 15
proposed limiting construction traffic to main arteries to reduce
congestion and prevent damage to the roads.
7. General Opposition to Traffic Measures:
o Some residents expressed a belief that traffic calming measures, in
general, would not be effective in reducing congestion or improving
safety, particularly if they are aimed at reducing vehicle density. There
was skepticism that such measures would work as intended and
concerns about them potentially making problems worse.
8. Support for Certain Measures:
o While many were opposed to specific traffic calming measur es, a few
residents supported ideas such as road bumps to reduce speed and
enhance safety for pedestrians and children. However, they also
acknowledged that these measures could cause issues for low cars
and might not be the perfect solution for all residents.
In summary, there is a strong preference for maintaining the current character of
Medina, with some residents expressing opposition to increased public transit,
traffic calming measures, and any changes that could make driving or parking
more difficult. There's also significant concern about the impact of non -resident
drivers, especially those passing through Medina, on traffic congestion and
safety.
Question #17 asked respondents to provide locations where the City should focus
efforts on safer streets. The responses are found on pages 86 through 91, with the
following key takeaways:
1. Major Streets and Arteries:
o Evergreen Point Road: Frequently mentioned for better lighting,
sidewalks, speed control, and narrowing to improve safety.
o 24th Street: Areas along 24th, including intersections with 84th Ave
and 12th Street, need more visibility, crosswalk improvements, and
speed control.
o 84th Avenue: Several mentions of speeding issues, especially near
the Chevron and St. Thomas areas, with suggestions f or improved
traffic control measures like speed bumps, cameras, and roundabouts.
o 12th Street: There are calls for wider sidewalks, traffic calming, and
better management of school traffic around Medina Elementary and
St. Thomas.
2. School Zones:
o Medina Elementary and St. Thomas: Several responses point to the
need for better traffic management, such as speed bumps, clearer
crosswalks, and police presence, especially during school drop -offs
and pick-ups.
o Speed and Traffic Control: Focus on controlling traffic speeds and
adding measures like speed bumps and more visible crosswalks near
schools, such as at the 5-way stop by St. Thomas.
15
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 11 of 15
3. Traffic Intersections:
o Intersections of 84th & 12th and 24th & 84th: These are considered
hazardous, especially during school rush hours, with suggestions for
traffic signals or roundabouts to improve flow and reduce accidents.
o NE 16th and NE 18th: There are recommendations for buffering
sidewalks from fast traffic near the country club, as well as warning
signs for pedestrians.
4. Sidewalks and Lighting:
o Many responses highlight the need for more sidewalks, especially
along Overlake Drive East and smaller side streets that are lacking
infrastructure for pedestrians.
o Improved street lighting, especially along Evergreen Point Road
and near schools, was also a key concern.
5. General Safety Concerns:
o Increased traffic due to potential development is a common worry, with
respondents suggesting that solutions focus on minimizing
congestion, speeding, and ensuring safer environments for walkers,
bikers, and drivers.
o Some also call for police patrols or enforcement of traffic rules to
ensure safer streets.
6. Opposition to Middle Housing:
o Some responses oppose the introduction of Middle Housing, citing
concerns over increased traffic and safety issues. Suggestions include
addressing safety proactively before implementing new housing
developments.
In conclusion, the focus for safer streets is primarily on major roads (Evergreen
Point Rd, 24th, 84th), school zones, and improving infrastructure for pedestrians,
such as sidewalks and lighting. There are also strong calls for better traffic
control, speed management, and improvements to key intersections, especially
those around schools.
Question #18: Respondents were asked if they or their family would consider
building an ADU, duplex or other middle housing on their lot. Out of the 148
responses received, 92 respondents (or 62.2%) stated “no”, 33 respondents (or
22.3%) responded with “maybe” and 23 respondents (or 15.5%) stated “yes”.
Question #19: This question was a follow-up response to the previous question
(#18). Of the 23 respondents who reported yes, 17 were most interested in building
an ADU, 4 respondents indicated an interest in cottage housing, 1 (one) responded
favorably towards stacked flats and 1 (one) towards a duplex. There were no
favorable responses towards courtyard apartments.
Question #20: This was another follow-up response to question #18. Of the 33
respondents who reported “maybe” to building middle housing, 22 reported that they
would be most interested in developing ADU’s, 9 responded with interest in cottage
16
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 12 of 15
housing, and 2 responded with an interest in duplexes. There was no interest in
courtyard apartments or stacked flats.
Question #21: For those that responded with a “no” to question #18, the reasons
for their selection can be found on pages 98 through 102. A summary of the reasons
for the “no” response, as generated by AI is as follows:
1. Space and Lot Size:
o Many residents feel their lots are too small to accommodate additional
housing (e.g., ADUs or middle housing). Some also state that their lot
is already fully developed or does not have enough space for
expansion.
o Some homes are already near or at the maximum allowable building
limits for their lot, making it difficult to add more structures.
2. Desire for Privacy and Quiet:
o A key concern is maintaining privacy and the quiet, low-density nature
of their neighborhood. Many feel that adding extra housing would
create noise, reduce privacy, and negatively affect the neighborhood's
peaceful atmosphere.
o Residents often highlight the importance of keeping large yard s for
personal use, kids, and pets, and worry that new housing would disrupt
this.
3. Community Character:
o Many residents value the single-family, suburban character of Medina
and do not want to see it changed. They believe that adding more
housing would degrade the community's appeal, alter its aesthetics,
and reduce its charm.
o Some feel that the density increase would make Medina feel more like
a city, which they are trying to avoid by living there.
4. Tree Preservation and Vegetation:
o Several residents are concerned that adding housing would lead to the
loss of trees and other valuable vegetation, which contribute to
Medina's beauty and quality of life.
5. Landlord Concerns:
o Many do not want the responsibility of becoming a landlord, managing
tenants, or dealing with potential issues related to renters. Some
simply do not want strangers living on their property.
6. Economic Concerns:
o A number of people believe that ADUs and middle housing wouldn't
truly address affordability issues, as they see the increase in density
as more of a financial opportunity for real estate speculators rather
than a solution for affordable housing.
7. Construction and Disruption:
o The potential construction disruption, including the loss of gardens or
the change in property flow, is a deterrent for many. Additionally, some
17
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 13 of 15
feel that the construction process isn't worth the trouble or expense,
especially when they already have an ADU or don't need one.
8. General Opposition to Density:
o Many oppose any increase in housing density, believing that it
contradicts the reason they moved to Medina in the first place —low-
density, quiet living. Some simply don't see a need for more housing
on their property.
9. Impact on Property Value:
o Some worry that adding an ADU or middle housing would devalue their
property and change the aesthetic appeal of their home and yard.
10. Cultural and Lifestyle Concerns:
o A few residents expressed that adding more housing would bring
unwanted changes to their lifestyle, including more noise, people, and
cars. They emphasized a desire to preserve the character of their
neighborhood and maintain the current quality of life.
In summary, the primary concerns are space limitations, privacy, maintaining
Medina's character and low-density lifestyle, reluctance to become landlords,
and fears about potential disruptions to the neighborhood's aesthetics and
environment. Many residents feel that Medina should remain as it is, without the
introduction of more housing.
Question #22: The survey also asked respondents which method they most likely
engage with to provide feedback to the City. Online surveys were the highest ranked
method at 89.6%, followed by 55.6% in favor of town hall/forums, 37.5% were in
favor of focus group discussions, 28.5% in favor of commenting at public meetings
and 7.9% responded with “other”. The “other” responses are found on page 104.
Question #23: Respondents were asked how they want to receive information and
updates about changes in the City. 90.2% responded that email was the preferred
option, 39.9% utilize the City website, 37.8% reported that mailers worked well,
21.7% engage with social media and 7% preferred phone contact. One (1) other
respondent preferred text messaging.
Question #24: With this question respondents were asked if there were any other
matters they would like the City to know about. Narrative responses are provided
on pages 107 through 111. The summary of results generated by AI are as
follows:
1. Impact of Housing Legislation and Density:
o There is significant opposition to the state-mandated increase in
housing density, particularly "middle housing." Many residents fear it
will negatively impact the character of Medina, turning it from a quiet,
residential community into a more urbanized area.
o Concerns about the enforcement of building codes, including
variances, and the potential for profit-driven, substandard construction
that compromises neighborhood aesthetics and safety.
18
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 14 of 15
o Residents feel that the city's unique, rural atmosphere, including the
preservation of greenery and trees, should be protected and not
sacrificed for higher density housing.
2. Concerns About Builders and Construction:
o Strict oversight of contractors and builders is a recurring issue,
especially regarding compliance with tree protection regulations and
ensuring that large, beautiful trees are not lost due to non-compliance.
o Several residents expressed frustration with the permitting process,
citing that it is cumbersome, inconsistent, and unnecessarily
expensive. There is also concern about construction noise, particularly
on weekends and early mornings.
3. Tree Protection:
o Several responses emphasized the importance of protecting Medina’s
trees. Many are concerned about the loss of tree canopy and want
updated tree protection codes to prevent further deforestation.
4. Public Safety and Infrastructure:
o Public safety is a major concern, especially regarding aggressive
driving, speeding, and parking issues, such as blocking lawful street
parking. Residents also expressed concerns over the impact of new
developments on the safety of the community, particularly in terms of
traffic and pedestrian safety.
o There are concerns about the adequacy of Medina's infrastructure
(e.g., roads, utilities) to handle increased density or multi-family
housing.
5. ADU and Housing Flexibility:
o Several residents expressed support for allowing Accessory Dwelling
Units (ADUs) and the ability to convert existing utility buildings into
ADUs, as long as they are done in a way that preserves the
community's character.
6. Public Meetings and Engagement:
o Some residents suggested that public meetings and hearings be made
more accessible by providing virtual options like Zoom to increase
community involvement and engagement.
7. Noise and Lighting Issues:
o Issues with excessive backyard lighting affecting neighborhood
character and residents' sleep patterns were raised. Residents also
pointed out that street lighting is insufficient in certain areas, making it
a safety concern.
8. Short-Term Rentals:
o There were concerns about the impact of short-term rentals like
Airbnbs on the community, particularly with respect to the potential for
disrupting the neighborhood's stability and increasing traffic.
9. General Opposition to Change:
o Many residents expressed a strong desire to keep Medina a single -
family, low-density community and resist state-imposed mandates that
19
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 15 of 15
they feel would negatively alter the city's character. Some suggested
joining with neighboring cities in legal action against such mandates.
Overall, residents want to preserve the quiet, suburban character of Medina,
protect its trees, and ensure that any new housing development maintains high
standards while considering the impact on infrastructure, public safety, and the
community's overall aesthetic.
While the AI generated responses are a useful summary, it is helpful to review the
verbatim responses provided by the many community members who took the time to
respond to this survey. It is likely that City Council will be interested in using the
feedback to inform policy decisions for not only the middle housing project, but also for
other community concerns identified by community members.
Exhibits:
Exhibit 1 – Online Survey Results, generated February 18, 2025
20
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Report for Medina Middle Housing Survey
Completion Rate:72.4%
Complete 144
Partial 55
Totals: 199
Response Counts
1
21
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
1. Are you familiar with the term ‘middle housing’?
49% Yes, somewhat familiar
21% Yes, very familiar
16% Not sure
14% No, not at all familiar
Value Percent Responses
Yes, somewhat familiar
Yes, very familiar
Not sure
No, not at all familiar
Totals: 195
48.7%95
21.0%41
16.4%32
13.8%27
2
22
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Statistics
Skipped 4
Total Responses 195
3
23
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
2. Middle Housing refers to a range of housing types that can provide
more than one housing unit per lot in a way that is compatible in scale
with single-family homes. Do you know of possible housing types this
could entail?
62% Yes
20% No
19% Maybe
Value Percent Responses
Yes
No
Maybe
Totals: 194
61.9%120
19.6%38
18.6%36
4
24
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Statistics
Skipped 5
Total Responses 194
5
25
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
ResponseID Response
3. Under new state legislation, middle housing includes two or more
attached, stacked, or clustered homes including duplexes, triplexes,
fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, stacked flats, courtyard
apartments, and cottage housing; however, not all of these middle housing
types are required in Medina.The City of Medina is required to allow for
middle housing types that allow for two primary units or one primary unit
and two accessory units. This means that the City of Medina must allow
for duplexes, stacked flats, courtyard apartments and cottage housing.
What are your initial reactions to learning what Medina is required to
allow for?
medinahousingchange
cityormiddledensitycommunityparking
property character
neighborhood
stateconcernedsingle
feellot
homes
idea
impactunitsbuilt
concern family
lots
6
26
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
12 While the legislation aims to address the statewide housing shortage and promote
diverse housing options, there are valid reasons to oppose its implementation in Medina
due to its potential impacts on traffic, road infrastructure, and property values. 1. Traffic
and Road Infrastructure Limitations Increased Traffic Congestion: Allowing middle
housing, such as duplexes or two-unit flats, will increase neighborhood density. This
could lead to more vehicles on roads that are already not designed for higher traffic
volumes. Medina's streets are primarily built for single-family home communities with
low-density traffic patterns, and they lack the capacity to accommodate the surge in
vehicles that middle housing would bring112. Parking Challenges: Even with parking
mandates capped at one or two spaces per unit depending on lot size, the increased
density could lead to overflow parking on streets. This creates safety hazards and
aesthetic issues in neighborhoods that currently enjoy spacious layouts23. Strain on
Infrastructure: Medina's roadways and supporting infrastructure were not designed for
high-density living. The introduction of middle housing could necessitate costly upgrades
to roads and utilities, placing a financial burden on the city and its residents113. 2.
Concerns About Property Values Potential Devaluation of Single-Family Homes: Many
residents worry that introducing middle housing into predominantly single-family
neighborhoods will negatively impact property values by altering the character of these
areas. While some studies suggest mixed results regarding property value impacts, the
perception of reduced exclusivity and increased density often leads to resistance from
homeowners922. Market Dynamics: Allowing denser housing types may increase land
values due to higher development potential. However, this could also raise property
taxes for existing homeowners while potentially reducing the desirability of single-family
homes in areas with higher density2530. Neighborhood Aesthetics: Even if middle
housing is designed to match the scale of single-family homes, many residents fear it will
disrupt the visual harmony and appeal of their neighborhoods, further impacting property
values1830. 3. Broader Implications Preservation of Community Character: Medina is
known for its serene, low-density residential environment. Introducing middle housing
risks altering this character by increasing population density and changing the
demographic composition of neighborhoods. Limited Local Benefits: Middle housing does
not necessarily equate to affordable housing. In a high-cost area like Medina, these units
may still be priced out of reach for middle-income families, undermining one of the
primary goals of HB 1110
13 Unfavorable as over time this will negatively impact the special character of our
community as well as property prices. Also it raises questions about the potential impact
on property taxes: will we still be assessed at the premium rate if the premium quality of
life here is less?
14 Sucks. Reeks of taxation without representation.
15 Concerns about parking and traffic.
16 I am a bit apprehensive about how this will impact the character of Medina. This includes
house design, tree coverage, traffic.
17 Well, it's a big change but change is inevitable. I'm ok with it and hope that the changes
don't change the city for the worse.
ResponseID Response
7
27
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
18 Duplexes are fine but any more density is potentially asking for trouble. If there are
multiple units, some may eventually be required to be for low income housing and for
drug addicts.
19 I'm worried this will overtax our infrastructure and negatively change our quiet, safe
neighborhoods.
20 I think that Medina is late to the table on this discussion and are ill prepared to deal with
the new housing laws. After attending the meeting last week, it appears that many
residents believe we can reverse or not comply with this law. However, that is not the
case and I think the meetings going forward should make this clear and focus on what
we need to put in place to ensure that our neighborhood is set to mitigate these changes
in the best way possible. For example. we need to establish design guidelines, lighting
restrictions or guidelines. For example, if someone builds a complex with a shared
courtyard, they could put in a basketball court or pickle ball court with night time lighting.
This could be a huge issue for the neighbors. In addition, this example would also pertain
to noise levels. Parking was also brought up at the meeting. I would also propose that a
focus group is formed of residents to come up with ideas. I also would recommend that
this focus group meet with Yarrow Point, Hunts Point and Clyde Hill. We should be
binding together to share and problem solve this as a larger community
21 I'm disappointed that the state of Washington is mandating what is best for our town,
especially given all the new housing available next door in Bellevue.
22 Not pleased. Do not want apartments.
23 the items that have the smallest impact in terms of additional sqaure feet of living space
and charactor to the city
24 Par for the course
25 Par for the course
26 I'm concerned that we will lose a lot of the charm (small town feel) that Medina provides.
27 Keep Medina...Medina!
28 Unsure. I didn't move to Medina to be in a high density area.
29 I really hate the state forcing this, but understand the need for housing in the state.
30 I really hate the state forcing this, but understand the need for housing in the state.
31 This will change the appeal of the city given city's close proximity to Seattle and Bellevue
downtown.
32 It is very possible the new code will change the style of Medina, reduce the
attractiveness of the city.
ResponseID Response
8
28
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
33 I am generally in favor of Allowing middle housing types along the lines that the city is
required to sport. The major concern I have is for parking: my view, the city should ensure
that adequate parking exists for any middle housing types. Such that overflow of cars are
not on the street. Further, I would object to raising the height limit and total lot coverage
percentage, as this would detract from the quality of ownership.
34 It what it is.
35 Initially not excited ,but understand it's needed and required.
36 Incomprehensible. I am sure we can find areas where that can be done vs a place like
Medina or Tri points area where communities are residential homes.
37 seems fine
38 Medina has always been a smaller city with single family houses only. Infrastructure is
not designed to double or triple number of residents. Also, historic spirit of smaller city
will be lost with additional houses on backyards.
39 The first concern is in terms of impact of increased traffic, on-street parking (due to a lack
of on driveway and garage spaces), impact to property values and taxes.
40 1. It's state legislation so in some way Medina must comply. 2. Would existing
setback/coverage/height requirements change? For example, an R-16 lot that is only
8119 sq ft has a 30% / 55% coverage limit. We're already packed in pretty tight, (north
of 24th and south of WA520), and I would not support an increase in lot coverage or
height. 3. Many of the lots that offer the closest access to mass transit fall in the "small
lot" category.
41 Initially I'm supportive of the option to allow for ADUs and two primary units as
presented, such that they fit within the property and respect setbacks. However, I'm
concerned about the increased noise, traffic, on-street overflow parking and light that
may increase from such structures.
42 111
44 These requirements sound reasonable.
45 I agree it's necessary and I like the fact the footprint of these new kinds of dwellings will
be no greater than current code on lot coverage
46 Do not like it
47 It's the law and the state does need more housing, so it makes sense. As long as Medina
code can retain current setbacks, lot coverage, height, etc. One concern will be parking.
48 I don't have any issues with the small upzoning requirements for Medina.
ResponseID Response
9
29
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
49 We followed strict permitting guidelines when we built our home - lot setbacks, hard
paved surfaces, tree canopy, height guidelines, etc. i hope the city of Medina holds any
type of middle housing to these strict guidelines or even more strict guidelines when
considering these types of builds. Permit process must not allow for variances for middle
housing.
50 Suprised but would like to see what measures we can take to keep Medina a quiet, low
density neighorhood.
51 This is wrong headed, un-democratic social engineering being imposed upon
communities without adequate input from the residents. It has elsewhere been shown to
upend the stability of everything from neighborhood character to home prices and will
never succeed in its purported purpose of forcing availability of affordable housing.
Totally against it.
52 Initial reaction is that I don't want this type of housing.
53 as least as possible - something a primary unit plus one ADU which is two primary units.
54 i'm all for it!
55 i'm all for it!
56 I don't have an issue with it. I don't think it will fundamentally change the vibe of our city
because the available land to build these types of homes is minimal. My only concern is
increased traffic and need for parking with minimal infrastructure to handle it,
57 Do NOT do it!!!!!!!!
58 Since it's your choice whether you build extra housing on your land, I think it's a great
idea. Nice to have opportunity to have mixed type housing and be more creative as well
as more prudent with resources (electricity, heating, etc).
59 Horrified! Developers will ultimately drive this process without concern for the beauty of
Medina.
60 Us seniors need more courtyard garden , most of us have mobility issues and fixed
income. The only 55 and over is Nottingham and this property manager puts seniors out
to the streets, she says she doesn't have to have a reason. The problem is it's the
cheapest place we can afford, All 55 and over have gone up to over a thousand for just
rent. There are only 3 , 55 and over in Medina
61 I'd like to see some flexibility in setback requirements and/or height requirements. Many
folks do not want a 2-story or flat-roofed structure.
62 Medina already has some cottage housing. Let's keep it at that.
63 It will change the entire aesthetic of the neighborhood
ResponseID Response
10
30
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
64 surprised
65 I love Medina the way it is - tree lined, eco friendly, with a neighborhood feel and with
little traffic. I'd rather not change its character so if we are required to implement those
changes I'd prefer that those types of dwellings be subject to the same setbacks, height
limitations etc that single family housing is subject to.
66 Negative reaction. That is not why we chose to live here. If we wanted a higher density
community we would have chosen to live downtown somewhere. My feelings is it will
not incorporate into Medina's historic feelings very well at all.
67 This doesn't seem to make sense in the city of our size with limited lots.
68 I do not like the idea of this. It would change the feel of the neighborhood. I think it would
be ok to have an accessory dwelling unit in the back yard for company and maybe make it
allowed to be a little larger, but I don't like the idea of apartments duplexes or triplexes.
69 I know that more affordable housing is needed but I wonder how Medina would be able
to make that happen and wonder how many people would actually build this type of
housing. I think if there are setback rules for neighbors that would make a difference on
how crowded it could feel.
70 ok
71 I am very unhappy that the state is forcing the cities to do this. Cities should zone, not the
state.
72 I think it's a nice option to have as a homeowner.
73 Shocked and unbelievabe
74 Bs
75 These buildings might require larger setbacks than are currently required for single
household dwellings, as they could be tall and intrusive. Would the property owner be
required to live on the property?
76 Not happy about it
77 Overall, inconsistent with the neighborhood. Allow near existing commercial and non-
residential uses such as gas station, green store, post office, nursery, churches, golf
course, parks, and schools. Allow near SR 520. Allow adjacent bus routes of travel. Allow
additional units to be small rentals such as cottages, basement units, above garages. But
don't allow them to be sold separately, just minor rentals. Be more flexible if it is for a
family member such as an adult student or parent. Try to preserve large chunks on single
family areas. Allow the use of small 300 SF max boat houses be repurposed to rental
units.
ResponseID Response
11
31
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
78 I am for ADUs but not more than that
79 not happy about this
80 This is a horrible idea.
82 Would need to find locations along big streets where it doesn't disturb the residential
feel
83 It will make parking more difficult.
84 NO. I do not agree with Middle housing. There is plenty of housing (apartments, condos,
townhomes, etc) throughout the greater Bellevue area. And, at much lower costs than
what most could afford in Medina. Homes being built are losing character just to gain
square footage and I think middle housing will make smaller cities lose their charm.
85 It could create more housing opportunities, but I'm not a fan or shared housing because
these days people don't know how to be considerate of others. I lived in a condo for more
than a decade but I had to leave due to bad neighbors. It's much more peaceful living in a
single home.
86 I am more intrigued and open to cottage housing than I would be for the other types of
higher density options.
87 I hate the idea of "middle housing!"
88 This is a TERRIBLE idea.
89 Not a fan.
90 Not a fan.
91 While I understand the need, I worry about the look and feel of what our lots could all
look like. And the overcrowding of the lots and the right-of-ways/street. Parking could
become more like Seattle. Over populated.
92 Not in favor
93 stacked flats, cottage housing
94 a. Higher density is a sensible solution to housing scarcity b. I don't really want higher
density, as I've chosen Medina for its relative "quiet" c. I don't know if this will result in
speculators buying lots and developing middle housing to generate greater revenue, or if
Medina will distinguish itself as a haven for single family homes, but either outcome will
result in market pressures increasing the cost of housing here.
95 It seems like it will be difficult to accomplish in Medina.
ResponseID Response
12
32
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
96 Don't like it at all!!!
97 My reaction is not favorable because I don't think middle housing would be affordable for
people considering to live in Medina. It's barely affordable for some of current residents.
98 Stressful.
99 Ridiculous! We pay extraordinary taxes to live here, a certain lifestyle.
100 Missed
101 I like things the way they are. But that is not the case anymore.
102 I do not agree with it all. It would totally ruin this beautiful city Medina. This falls under
the "category of too much Government." 1801 77th Ave NE
103 As long as we can keep the character and some greenery I'm ok with it
104 Interesting.
105 We think the City and State pushing this concept is ridiculous. It would obviously
degrade the quality of life and safety for Medina's existing residents. We will always
Strongly oppose anything that can negatively impact Medina's quality of life. Middle
Housing will not be accepted.
106 In a place like Medina, it would take decades for any change to take place.
107 My street has CC & R's since 1964, that are in effect. I find it hard to believe the "middle
housing" has priority!
108 Stacked flats seem incompatible with current community resources.
109 horrible, terrible. it will destroy the character of Medina which lead all of us to live here.
we should do the absolute minimum to comply with this worthless state law. our city
must try to keep our housing regulations local and not set by the state.
110 Yuck. It will destroy MEdina.
111 After attending the meeting in January, I feel like I have a good understanding on what
Medina is required to allow for. Also knowing that the "building envelop" regulation has
not changed.
112 You're saying yes but the answer is really no due to Medina rules.
113 I think this is a positive move to allow for more housing. My biggest worry is that these
units will be very expensive and not expand the inventory of affordable housing in our
area.
ResponseID Response
13
33
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
114 Surprised. It will change the makeup of the community however with time there will be
acceptance.
115 Reluctant surprise. Think it will change the flavor of the community but there will be
acceptance.
116 Should the City of Medina fight the top down mandates to fight for local planning,
density, and zoning decisions?
117 I do not like it.
118 'middle housing' is a bad idea. States like WA have put on their agenda for decades
trying to eliminate the middle/working class. They are taking advantage of people's
kindness and warmness to destroy America's tradition/culture. One example is they are
building high rise in the downtown Bellevue (our lovely QFC will be replaced by crowd
high rise residents). Greedy builders are happy in making money while the old
quiet/peaceful community got eliminated. This 'middle housing' idea plays similar roles.
WA has plenty of lands to build houses to satisfy housing demands. Why add 'middle
housing' to the traditional single family housing community? Why Medina? You never
know who your neighbors would be once this becomes real. Trust among people will go
away. Middle/working class will lose their ownership of lands by the end. Similar things
are happening now in California LA. After the recent fire, it takes endless time for
middle/working class to rebuild their home while big companies behind are purchasing
the lands and who knows what and how they are going to use the land. NO 'middle
housing'!
119 not a big deal
120 Increased density is good overall; I don't know the implications for Medina infrastructure
and services to support it.
121 Surprised
122 I am not in favor of the middle housing rule. I wish there were heavier rulings for these
second stacked, duplexes and courtyard apartments as it is going to bring down the
value of the property we now have.
123 Two accessory units seems excessive. One would be ok on lots that could accommodate
one. I'm not sure where cottage housing or courtyard apts could be built in Medina as it's
mostly built out with single family houses.
124 I think this should not be allowed
125 not sure
ResponseID Response
14
34
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
126 For the most part, I am not opposed to these types of dwellings, but am very concerned
about access to homes and parking. The other big issue for my husband and myself is the
landscaping of properties. We love the look of a 'green' Medina with numerous
established large trees; unfortunatly in recent years, we see many properties stripped of
most of the existing trees so that 3 house can be built where there previously was only
one. The finished landscaping has not even come close to making the property look like it
is green and natural. Some examples are on Evergreen Point Road north of the overpass.
127 This is upsetting given the more remote and expensive nature of Median Real estate. I
would be in support of 2 primary units on some lots, but that seems about right--higher
density should be reserved for areas closer to major downtown corridors than Medina.
128 Initial reaction is that our neighborhood will not feel the same and it will become more
crowded and more cars. Also worried builders will take advantage of this to make more
money not to provide cheaper housing. There should also be some bonus of these extra
homes going to people who work for the city or Medina Elementary.
129 Concern about increased traffic, decrease in property values, bringing in more renters to
the area
130 I don't like the idea but am not overly worried residents will embrace their construction
and use.
131 I'm sad that this could change the look and feel of neighborhood. Medina was zoned for
single family homes and it has worked well.
132 Do not want it!
133 I'm vehemently against it!
134 What is the required % or count of these units to be built in Medina? How does this
impact Medina population count?
135 To me this sounds like an infringement on my rights as a citizen. I understand the need to
accommodate housing however those in need should problem solve for themselves
without burdening others. This may sound unsympathetic but survival of the fittest may
apply in this situation.
136 I'm unsure of what this means, based on the little information provided here. What are
the details? I would imagine that multi-unit constuction would require a minimum lot
size? Do state requirements have a minimum number of units required per
area/population/lots by a certain date?
137 I'm not for it!
138 Not happy about it, hope Medina will resist somewhat within the confines of the law
139 not happy
ResponseID Response
15
35
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
140 I'm happy that Medina can do its part to solve our home affordability and availability
crisis. It doesn't make sense that Medina's population is shrinking while so many people
want to move to the Greater Seattle area. Welcoming new families into our community
will make it richer in more ways than one.
142 I do not want Medina to change any of their housing height restrictions or set backs. I
think the goal of all this is low income housing which will totally change our community.
143 Concern about impervious surfaces and reduction of trees
144 I hope that we can use this as an oppurtunity to create more accessible options to live in
our town - but am nervous about builders using it to create more houses that feel like
they fill an entire lot/cut down all trees, and that we'll lose the feel of our community we
love.
145 I am concerned about the potential impact of increased density on our community's
character and infrastructure.
146 I am open for the new requirement !
147 Dislike but can see some possible benefits.
148 It seems like Medina has chosen options that will keep the community character nearly
the same. The difference between Middle Housing and existing ADU rules in Medina is
not clear though.
149 That is great to allow for better use of the land and affordability. Medina has a large
NIMBY problem.
150 game changer for character and style of Medina
151 Sounds good
152 We shall allow it much earlier.
153 I think this is great. Medina does not currently have housing that is affordable for all but
the extremely wealthy. Middle housing provides a nice middle ground for allowing more
housing without allowing large apartments.
155 No way!
156 I believe in property rights and if an additional living unit fits the code I would be OK with
additional housing units on lots with existing structures.
157 Cool
158 And don't think it's a great idea
ResponseID Response
16
36
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
159 Concerned
160 I am concerned that investors, foreign or domestic will come into our beloved
neighborhoods and tear down homes to put up duplexes and multifamily dwellings for
their financial gain. Our city should implement a clause that states the owners of the
property must reside at the property. With that clause, it would deter those looking only
for financial investments.
161 Not favorable.
162 I am concerned that investors, foreign or domestic will come into our beloved
neighborhoods and tear down homes to put up duplexes and multifamily dwellings for
their financial gain. Our city must implement a clause that states the owners of the
property must reside at the property. With that clause, it would deter those looking only
for financial investments.
163 Disappointed, it will change the area as it was built and intended.
164 This is stupid and cities should be allowed to say no
165 It's absolutely awful and if allowed will ruin the quaint community charm of Medina.
166 Concerned about the possible change in character of Medina.
167 Is this a theoretical problem or actually is there going to be more house built and rental
properties?
168 I am concerned and think the city should be thoughtful about how this requirement is
achieved.
169 It's unfortunate
170 Sad to hear it could change the characteristics that make Medina great
171 Thank you very much I am happy for your help me this will be my best friend to do this
with zoey room
172 It's going to ruin the nature of Medina. Parking may become an issue like Seattle and a
more transient population with numerous renters does not lend itself to community
building.
173 I hope that it is grouped and clustered appropriately. Put these types of properties near
businesses and transportation. Do not scatter in neighborhoods. Keep the price and
finishes in line with existing housing.
174 That is going to negatively impact Medina and change it forever.
ResponseID Response
17
37
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
175 I am worried that more housing will ruin the appeal of serene and quiet neighborhood
charm for Medina.
176 It's about time.
177 My initial reaction is that this will fundamentally change the characteristics of the town.
178 We already have townhomes in Medina, so I don't know that this is a problem. Ideally
they would be in the character of other homes in the neighborhood.
179 State law. I don't think Medina residents' reactions are relevant.
180 I am fine with these requirements.
181 How many floors would be allowed for courtyard apartments? Would they be tall
enough to cast shadows onto neighboring properties?
182 Understand we need to get more housing units and Medina's location close to everything
is ideal but concerned on impact to character. Would not want to see taller housing but
perhaps more lot coverage is OK
183 Doesn't make sense, I think it should be a requirement to big cities like Belleve, Redmond
and Kirkland, not Medina. Medina should maintain its low density single family life style,
which is the biggest reason people move in here
184 Medina is very safe and quiet community. I concern this change will cause safety issues
185 yes
186 It doesn't make sense.
187 Media is beautiful and peaceful. I don't think Medina needs these"middle housing types". I
don't want Medina to become crowded one day. Because we already have parking and
traffic problems, especially during the school dismissal time and some festival weekends.
And Medina even stopped Easter eggs hun last year which disappointed a lot Medina
kids due to the traffic and crowds.
188 Pretty surprised. I do not feel it's compatible for the Medina community that has been
known for: quiet, private and clean.
189 We are not pleased with these new requirements that might impact City of Medina.
190 Some concern for tree/canopy cover. More lots with buildings from edge to edge with no
yard space/vegetation/trees.
191 Will increase density and pose load on existing infrastructure.
ResponseID Response
18
38
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
192 It will change the dynamic of Medina. Medina's infrastructure is not built for high density.
It's very sad.
193 It's not a good idea to have such a wide range of different types of properties without
being consistent.
194 Beware the do-gooders
195 None
196 Not sure
197 If managed correctly middle housing should be fine
199 Ok as long as current building codes are still enforced.
200 This sucks.
201 I don't agree with the new laws. This is why we live in Medina. Hoping our community
does not take advantage of these new WA laws.
202 faf
203 Absolutely not. The city should fight it as it does not fit building codes in Medina.
204 Absolutely no, let's try to maintain the neighborhood.
205 It's terrible that the state is allowed to disrupt neighborhoods. Has this been through a
court challenge? There is probably no compensation to a homeowner that winds up
living next to a crowded, disproportionate middle housing type. More cars, more
driveway coverage, fewer trees. A bad idea all around. Truly, a violation of property
rights.
206 I'm extremely concerned that the small, safe city will become less so with these types of
properties.
207 Deeply disappointed. I moved to Medina because it was low density, single dwelling
specifically. I will look for the earliest opportunity to leave Washington state.
208 It can be a good thing for the city and property owners
209 I'm disappointed this change is being forced on Medina, concerned about the increased
density in the neighborhood and all that it will bring, including noise, development,
parking issues, etc.
210 I think the legislation should be overturned. Mandating middle housing on every city in
the state isn't the solution to affordable housing.
ResponseID Response
19
39
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
20
40
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
1 - Not all
concerned
2 -
Slightly
concerned
3 -
Somewhat
concerned
4 -
Moderately
concerned
5 -
Extremely
concerned Responses
Lighting
Count
Column %
41
24.4%
50
26.9%
35
20.7%
24
10.1%
29
5.9%
179
Noise
Count
Column %
16
9.5%
32
17.2%
28
16.6%
42
17.6%
61
12.4%
179
Parking
Count
Column %
14
8.3%
21
11.3%
28
16.6%
41
17.2%
75
15.3%
179
Traffic
Count
Column %
16
9.5%
21
11.3%
19
11.2%
43
18.1%
80
16.3%
179
Tree
Preservation
Count
Column %
33
19.6%
30
16.1%
24
14.2%
24
10.1%
68
13.8%
179
Safety
Count
Column %
28
16.7%
18
9.7%
20
11.8%
34
14.3%
78
15.9%
178
Property
Values
Count
Column %
20
11.9%
14
7.5%
15
8.9%
30
12.6%
100
20.4%
179
Totals 168
13.4%
186
14.9%
169
13.5%
238
19.0%
491
39.2%
1252
100.0%
4. This state-required change will have impacts on the Medina community.
What are your highest concerns about the possible impacts of this state
legislation? Please classify the following possible impacts to your level of
concern for each.
21
41
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
ResponseID Response
12 Road size and road connections
16 Developer over development.
17 Esthetics of the city.
18 Lack of garages (should be required to have garages)
19 Infrastructure overwhelm
20 esthetics of the building structures
21 Privacy -- distance from a house to an ADU or other unit.
24 Process
26 Noise from building/development
28 Character of neighborhood
30 Size of houses is too large and side yard set backs should be larger
31 Utility. Medina does not have stable utility from recent experience. More housing
probably will make the situation worse.
33 Height and lot coverage allowances
5. Was there a concern not listed? If so, please specify.
neighborhoodbuilding
characterhousing
medinaor
feel
privacy
propertyarchitectural
communitycoveragehomeshouses
infrastructure
lacklot
parks
populationqualityschool
adu
airbnb
build
city
22
42
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
38 Increase of pollution (more driveways, more concrete, more driving)
40 Lot coverage and building mass. Can Medina's infrastructure, (both physical and human)
accommodate a larger population?
41 Property tax impacts
44 Architectural design of units.
45 Designs not compatible with the historic Medina neighborhood environment
46 General atmosphere of the area
49 Community Feel
50 Medina population
51 Not just property value per se but affordability of housing will decrease as developers
buy land to build these multiple units. Neighborhoods in San Diego already suffering
under this madness.
56 No
58 Neighbors resenting new housing if built near them
59 Architectural appeal and quality of construction of these new units .
67 No
71 Decrease in privacy
75 Setbacks
77 Architectural integrity
78 Privacy
85 It could block views from homes depending on how high the building is
91 privacy and crowded
93 widening roads
95 Where to build…
96 No
ResponseID Response
23
43
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
97 No
101 Just that individuals might sometime in the future be forced to sell only for some type of
diddle housing!
103 we already have some horrible lights on newer houses, 12th st eg It cant get worse
105 Local gov't that ignores the will of its residents
106 None
107 Water run off.
109 neighbor charactor
111 n/a
112 N/A
115 no
116 Character of Medina per Comprehensive Plan
117 Intrusion of government
118 ownership of lands
119 n/a
120 Utilities (electrical grid is already fragile; sewer capacity)
123 Design--I suggest a design review board or the planning commission serve as design
reviewers for middle housing. Binding decisions would be necessary for some elements.
126 There should be more discussion about the architecture that is approved. In recent years,
more homes have been constructed that look like boxes to maximize coverage and not
consider variations for a more interesting roof line or shape of the building.
128 Look and feel of neighborhood
130 I do not want daily rentals such as AirBnB or VRBO
131 Aesthetics
132 Feel/personality of our community
ResponseID Response
24
44
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
133 When we purchased our house we were looking for a specific kind of SFR neighborhood.
That is not compatible with multiple houses on a lot.
135 School overcrowding.
140 Load on our aging sewer and electrical systems. Overloading our limited cell phone
towers.
143 Impervious sutfaces
150 character of city and residents, quality of life
156 N/A
157 No
160 Peace and tranquility gone
164 It will look like crap next to single family homes
166 Neighborhood character - prefer a semi rural ambiance vs urban.
167 The traffic and speeding during school start and end
170 Character loss
171 Yes
172 Lack of community connection with short term renters
173 The look or aesthetic of our neighborhood.
174 Impact on infrastructure and lack of services
175 Crowds will increas in our neighborhood parks
177 That an ADU or Middle housing would be used as an Airbnb. How will this impact the
schools?
179 Sidewalk improvement
181 Poetical of adverse effect on property values and increased property taxes.
183 current public facility is not designed for more population, such school, parks
192 Neighborhood feel of Medina.
ResponseID Response
25
45
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
194 Change to the character of the neighborhood by real estate speculators and people who
don't actually live here
196 Street appeall
199 Building construction noise and traffic.
200 Traffic
203 Crime
205 Rights of property owners completely disregarded.
207 Crowding at parks on walking. I moved to Medina because it was low density.
210 Quality of life.
ResponseID Response
26
46
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
ResponseID Response
6. If your neighbor redevelops for middle housing or adds an ADU, what
concerns would you have?
noiseparking
propertytrafficprivacy
safety
housing
street
house
lot
neighborhood
medina
people change
community
concerns
construction
issuesterm
values
additional
family
middle neighbors
or
27
47
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
12 While the legislation aims to address the statewide housing shortage and promote
diverse housing options, there are valid reasons to oppose its implementation in Medina
due to its potential impacts on traffic, road infrastructure, and property values. 1. Traffic
and Road Infrastructure Limitations Increased Traffic Congestion: Allowing middle
housing, such as duplexes or two-unit flats, will increase neighborhood density. This
could lead to more vehicles on roads that are already not designed for higher traffic
volumes. Medina's streets are primarily built for single-family home communities with
low-density traffic patterns, and they lack the capacity to accommodate the surge in
vehicles that middle housing would bring112. Parking Challenges: Even with parking
mandates capped at one or two spaces per unit depending on lot size, the increased
density could lead to overflow parking on streets. This creates safety hazards and
aesthetic issues in neighborhoods that currently enjoy spacious layouts23. Strain on
Infrastructure: Medina's roadways and supporting infrastructure were not designed for
high-density living. The introduction of middle housing could necessitate costly upgrades
to roads and utilities, placing a financial burden on the city and its residents113. 2.
Concerns About Property Values Potential Devaluation of Single-Family Homes: Many
residents worry that introducing middle housing into predominantly single-family
neighborhoods will negatively impact property values by altering the character of these
areas. While some studies suggest mixed results regarding property value impacts, the
perception of reduced exclusivity and increased density often leads to resistance from
homeowners922. Market Dynamics: Allowing denser housing types may increase land
values due to higher development potential. However, this could also raise property
taxes for existing homeowners while potentially reducing the desirability of single-family
homes in areas with higher density2530. Neighborhood Aesthetics: Even if middle
housing is designed to match the scale of single-family homes, many residents fear it will
disrupt the visual harmony and appeal of their neighborhoods, further impacting property
values1830. 3. Broader Implications Preservation of Community Character: Medina is
known for its serene, low-density residential environment. Introducing middle housing
risks altering this character by increasing population density and changing the
demographic composition of neighborhoods. Limited Local Benefits: Middle housing does
not necessarily equate to affordable housing. In a high-cost area like Medina, these units
may still be priced out of reach for middle-income families, undermining one of the
primary goals of HB 1110
13 All 7 impacts listed above.
15 Parking on the street and traffic.
16 Property value, parking, sunlight (depending on ADU design), tree coverage, house
design
17 I'd have two concerns, one that it infringed on my privacy and two that it was an eyesore
18 Parking issues
19 I'm deeply concerned about noise, street parking, overtaxing our infrastructure, increased
lighting
20 See my response - question 4, 5
ResponseID Response
28
48
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
21 Mostly concerned with how it will affect existing views from my home, especially impact
to privacy. Also concerns with noise, lighting, tree removal, traffic.
22 Property values parking on street.
23 way too many people living on the lot, will over time probably make Medina like
Greenlake
24 Privacy and tree preservation
25 Preservation of trees and privacy
26 Increased noise, parking issues, and some loss of privacy.
27 As previously.
28 Will I be safe?
30 Would want trees or shrubs to help maintain privacy Would like design standards to be
developed Parking
31 How fast the trend will take the city to a town with different life style.
32 Property values.
33 How far away the setback is from the new property to mine. Increased parking on the
street. Lighting from new or existing housing that illuminates my yard or structure.
Increase noise, fire and smoke from outdoor amenities, and traffic.
34 Privacy
35 Privacy- concern that new units could crowd and peer into our house and property.
Noise- more families per lot = more noise. Noise and disruption from construction. Trees-
worried that we will lose trees which provide beauty and privacy House values going
down if developments not done well.
36 What will be the rules around ADU and possibly rentals?
37 None
38 Traffic, noise, infrastructure, safety.
40 Encroachment of personal space. Disrupting our relatively low-key street with additional
traffic and noise. (We don't have sidewalks on 78th.).
41 Overflow parking from the property to the street, noise and proximity of structures near
to and over the setbacks (causing privacy concerns).
ResponseID Response
29
49
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
42 111
44 Does the house fit the architecture of the neighborhood. Will there be off-street parking?
45 That the Building Code is enforced and that variances don't loosen lot and height
coverage standards
46 Look, parking and increased activity
47 Adhering to setbacks, lot coverage, height in current Medina code. Our street does not
allow on-street parking - so they'd need more off-street parking
48 None.
49 Property Value, Noise, Parking
50 Too close to next door home. Community look in terms of housing designs.
51 All the above
52 Would not want people just renting and not having a more long-term connection to the
community.
53 safety for middle housing
55 none
56 Primarily the issues with parking where we live and construction noise. We already have
limited parking and have suffered the noise of major construction projects for over a year
now- it's constant. i'm also concerned with damage to our roadways with heavy
construction vehicles.
58 Only how close to property line and blockage of sunlight but that would be the same if it
was a large single family house too
59 Loss of existing privacy. Noise, Light, Trees etc as mentioned earlier. I moved here from
Laurelhurst which became a crowded, high traffic, unsafe area, where architectural
beauty was discarded in favor of background high rises and now apartments. Broke my
heart.
60 Cost! Accessibility and safety
61 I'd like to see regulations designed to incentivize people designing structures that retain
the neighborhood architecture and character.
62 Noise. Safety.
ResponseID Response
30
50
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
63 Noise, parking, general disruption to the peaceful nature of the community we have
chosen to invest and live in.
65 There are a lot of shared driveways in Medina which were constructed for the very light
use of a limited number of single family homes and increasing the number of dwellings
per lot could make those impractical to use/overcrowded. In addition I'd be concerned
about tree cover, setbacks and noise.
66 Privacy, lighting, noise, parking, views, quality of our property.
67 That would negatively impact my property value
68 I would not like that!
69 Our neighbors already tried to allow the hedges to grow so they don't have to see our
house, so I'm not too worried about anything. It's already noisy with landscapers all day
and our street has barely any parking so doubt much would change.
70 allowed
71 As noted in answers to question #4.
72 If it's a shared driveway, there needs to be communications on expectations.
73 Property value and safety Construction noise Decreased privacy
74 All the above!
75 Tree preservation. Also that the new structure not intrude on the privacy of current
housing.
76 All the above
77 Architectural integrity. Materials. additional ROW access and related issues.
78 I do not mind an ADU but futile house dwelling is not inline with why we moved to the
sleepy neighborhood with added privacy. with no street parking in most of the area it
makes it more likely people will park illegally or unsafely on streets
79 Parking, noise, safety, property value
80 How fast can I move?
82 Noise and safety if sublet
83 changes in set back distances? Height changes?
ResponseID Response
31
51
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
84 Who is using the ADU or middle housing? How do these renters(?) or multiple owners
manage the property? We already have enough homes, we don't need to cram multiple
units in one property.
85 Construction noise, noise from new neighbors, loss of vegetation.
86 Parking. As well, I love the stability of long term neighbors. Having people move in and
out every few months is not desirable. But ADUs for multigenerational families is
wonderful!
87 All of the above!
88 Property value would be crushed, immediately. Traffic and noise would increase. Parking
would get worse.
89 Set backs. Short term rental/leasing.
90 Setbacks. Short term leasing.
91 How the neighborhood will look and what the rules will be. Over crowding and lack of
privacy. I can't imagine it looking very appealing.
92 Noise, parking, traffic
93 how neighbors would be affected and set backs maintained and traffic flow with
appropriate turn arounds
94 Construction noise; crime at construction site; more neighbor noise. I don't like noise.
95 Property value, aesthetics, views
96 I would leave the area and relocate
97 My concern would be access to my property with additional use of the right of way to my
home. Not knowing who my new neighbor is before they purchase the unit
99 House would depreciate in value
101 property values
103 I would prefer to keep the trees and to have off street parking
105 We and our neighbors will fight this.
106 Noise
107 Building envelope for additions
ResponseID Response
32
52
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
108 Increasing this kind of housing in Medina - specifically duplex, townhomes and stacked
units - is concerning because we already have a lot of homes owned by non US nationals
as investments. And many of these sit empty. Big investment in making our living denser
while we have empty homes means we would likely also have empty multi family homes
as well. Let's consider solutions like Vancouver BC that taxes non nationals at a high rate
when they don't use properties as a primary residence.
109 all of the concerns listed above plus losing the local neighborhood involvement and spirit
of Medina-----our unique character would be destroyed and we would become like any
other neighborhood in Bellevue
110 Lack of light, too much traffic and noise.
111 As long as they follow all the building permits, set-backs and building envelop, not much
you can do about it and don't see that the middle housing would change that.
112 Parking
113 I would say traffic. However our current traffic issues are greatly impacted by the amount
of construction that is going on. Otherwise I have no additional concerns.
115 Privacy.
116 This is an holistic problem. Increased density will result in less privacy, greater tree
canopy loss, and more impacts from lighting, noise, construction, more curb cuts and
garages, more cars and traffic, and potential impacts on property values (depending on
contiguous impacts at the time of marketing).
117 Degradation of neighborhood and reduction in value of my property. Government
intruding into my property rights.
118 all the above on the list
119 none
120 Noise and disruption during construction
121 Safety and house value
122 all of the above listed....
123 Set backs from my house, parking, design (fit in with the existing housing designs in the
neighborhood), number of residents per middle house.
124 It would change the neighborhood and I would not like it
125 noise
ResponseID Response
33
53
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
126 Access, traffic, parking. We currently have more than 20 vehicles a day turning around in
our driveway as we are at the north end of EPR and they realize, at that point, that EPR is
not taking them across the bridge. Medina has done nothing to slow down traffic (speed
bumps) and the few Dead End signs are never observed (could we not add flashing lights
to them such as the ones in Clyde Hill for Stop signs).
127 how it could affect our views, impact on additional power lines (ie, all new middle
housing should mandate power lines be buried in the adjacent properties), parking.
128 That it will not look like a single family home and there will be twice as many people,
cars, garbage cans, pets, etc. at that house.
129 Parking, increased traffic in the area, would prefer a clause saying they need to be long
term rentals.. dont want housing turning over every 6 months
130 That it would become a rental property
131 Parking on the streets. Housing values decreasing. School over crowding.
132 Would change the feel and openness of the lot! More buildings, more people, more
activity, more cars. Awful!
133 Will affect the open space I purchased; i.e. 1 house of half-acre lots. Will affect my views
and light coming to my house. Will increase traffic. Will affect our property value.
134 The fit these additions and overall look of the city could change in a significant way.
Parking and traffic could become a real issue.
135 Loss of privacy. Loss of community spirit.
136 I do not have enough information about the possibilities to form an opinion.
137 The change of our neighborhood which has been a family neighborhood.
138 Valuation! Neighbor/tenant quality (long term vs short term not as invested in
neighborhood.)
139 noise and safety concerns
140 My neighbor has an ADU. I don't have any concerns.
142 traffic, cars parking on street, garbage cans, safety, noise, loss of sense of safety and
community
143 Noise, parking and tree removal. Increase of density. Impervious surfaces
144 Higher traffic and noise if they use it as an airbnb type place. Construction noises
ResponseID Response
34
54
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
146 Safety and traffic.
147 All issues listed under $4.
148 The same concerns as have now for redeveloping of a neighborhood lot with a new huge
single home.
149 None. This is a good change towards housing affordability
150 all of the above
153 Test
155 Everything mentioned in question 4
156 I assume in Medina it would be an attractive building with considerate tenants (the rent
would be high and preclude a lot of transient tenants I assume, so they would be likely
reasonable neighbors)./
157 None
158 Privacy and noise and parking
159 Noise, privacy, safety, concerns if these units become short term rentals
160 That the owner resides on the property to ensure safety and preservation of the
community
161 Property values and character of our small, single family community
162 That the owner would not be present to ensure the protection of the property
164 It will look crappy and have too many people next to my property.
165 How large it is, the noise, how it will impact my property value, privacy
166 Change in character Increase in traffic, noise and pollution
167 None
168 I think it changes the feel of the neighborhood. Makes it a more urban vs quaint &
suburban street.
169 Parking Noise Property value Traffic
170 Loss of what makes medina special
ResponseID Response
35
55
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
171 I am very happy with my work as well and I am very happy to you give your help
172 Parking, how the rental is being used. How it is maintained and cared for by landlord
173 The potential use of the ADU. We have always had an ADU. It has been of great value to
us, and worked really well. We have had friends live in it, husband work in it, and an
Airbnb. I don't think our neighbors have had any issues.
174 My property would lose value and change the vibe at my lakefront home
175 Noise , privacy, traffic
176 No concern. I'm more concerned about people tearing down existing homes and trees and
building large ugly single family homes. You haven't done anything about that.
177 Parking, Noise, Traffic, Airbnb.
178 Biggest concern I have is about those ADUs or additional units being rented out for the
short term like on AirBnB.
179 Noise mostly
180 Parking availability, additional traffic
181 Building setback restrictions. Are ADUs going to be deeded separate from the primary
DU or deeded as part of the primary DU?
182 Stated in my opening remarks - Taller housing would not be desired but more coverage
on lots being allowed probably alright.
183 Tree Preservation: trees may be cut down to build more units Noise: more people, more
noisy Parking & traffic: community roads will be full of cars, reasult in traffic jam and
noisy, also it's bad for children safety Privacy: potentially new unit will be closer to my
house Property Values: reduce my house's value
184 It will change the tradition environment of Medina community. Medina houses used to
have big yards and space between two houses. With middle house, there will be less
privacy and increasing conflicts between neighbors
185 Parking, noise and property values
186 It get rented out or used as AirBnB for short term rentals.
187 The safety issue
188 Safety concerns, especially that the ADU might be rent to any people.
189 Noise, parking, traffic.
ResponseID Response
36
56
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
190 Removing trees & vegetation!!!! Building closer to lot lines. Buildings towering over our
yard.
191 Traffic/Noise/Safety
192 Traffic, safety and noise
193 Lack of privacy, lowered property value, more cars parked, more noise, more traffic
194 It depends on the nature of the structure. There is a lot of ugly housing being built in
Medina. Lots are being stripped and boxes being built. We have no design review. My
concern is the steady erosion of what was once a charming and visually pleasing, heavily
treed community.
195 None
196 Property value, parking, noise
197 Setbacks important. Off street parking important. Noise issues addressed.
199 Building construction house and traffic. New buildings could block light and views.
Medina building codes need to be enforced on new construction and alterations.
200 Noise
201 If it impacts my privacy. I also don't want rowdy people living next to me.
203 all of the above and crime
204 Ruins what the neighborhood is, this is not supposed to be , plenty of room in Bellevue
with all the condos and apartments
205 Too many cars. Middle housing that would affect our property more than the one it is
being added to. What happened to our set backs and lot coverage requirements.
206 My main concern is a potential increase in crime.
207 Property value, parking, noise
208 Parking.
209 Loss of privacy, loss of property value, increased noise and traffic, fundamental change to
neighborhood's character, more cars parked on the street. Insufficient room for additional
cars regularly using the street parking along with all the additional
garbage/recycling/yard waste cans.
ResponseID Response
37
57
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
210 I enjoy all of my neighbors, but based on current set backs on my lot, I can still hear my
neighbors more than I wish. I would assume that would get worse with middle housing
next door.
ResponseID Response
38
58
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
ResponseID Response
12 This is going to very less and minimum should be 2
13 Same as above
15 Too much parking on the street.
16 Given the limited transit options in Medina, unless ADUs are restricted to a single
occupant, one parking spot will be inadequate. Cars are the only way to get around.
17 Well, I suppose a concern would be that if there were not enough offstreet parking for
these ADU's that there would be more and more cars parked on the street which would
change the feeling of the neighborhood from a quiet residential neighborhood to more of
a city Street
18 The restriction can cause problems because units might actually need 3 spaces (2 one
visitor).
19 I worry that our streets will be lined with cars.
20 streets lined with cars where as of now we have none
7. Recent state legislation says the City of Medina cannot require more
than two off-street parking space for each middle housing unit.
Additionally, the City can only require one additional parking space for
each ADU. Given this information, what initial thoughts or concerns do you
have about the effects on your neighborhood?
parkingstreet
streets carsmedinatrafficneighborhood
orhousing
park
city
concern concernsparked
problem
safety
peoplespaces
additional
adu
allowed
limitedlot
property
worse
39
59
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
21 Many of our side streets are narrow and allowing cars to park overnight on those streets
is both dangerous and unsightly.
22 Impose the maximum amount of parking.
23 it is all going to be worse
24 Not sure
25 Extreme concern
26 We live within 1/2 mile of the 520 bus drop/park and ride. According to what I heard at
the meeting, parking will not be required for my neighborhood.
27 We don't want Medina to look like Seattle with a lot of street parking.
28 Traffic during school rush hours. Character of neighborhoods.
30 There needs to be serious thought given to better regulating on street parking. It
shouldn't be allowed on both sides of our narrow streets. Need to consider accessibility
for fire trucks
31 We have narrow roads in most part in the city. No available parking and additional traffic
will surely be a safety concern.
32 Parking on street, worse traffic.
33 I am concerned about the overflow of additional cars onto residential street or overnight
parking, as it can create a property and safety concern due to increase targets of car,
prowls, as well as the tracking from the overall looking for you of the neighborhood
34 Too many cars
35 Yes don't want overflow parking jamming up the streets
36 Property values will tank.
37 No concerns
38 Our smaller street will be hard to drive through and that will create lots of traffic.
40 Since our street has no curbs or sidewalks, on-street parking in done in lot setbacks.
Come visit 78th and take a peek at the construction traffic and parking.
41 This may not be enough as current parking sees cars associated with existing single
family housing overflowing to the street.
ResponseID Response
40
60
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
42 111
44 I'm concerned about people parking on the street and making it difficult to drive through
the neighborhood.
45 Medina will need to allow more street parking. Currently Medina is too restrictive about
street parking which even today makes it difficult to host more than a few guests without
them needing to park far away and walk
46 Do not want cars parked next to my yard
47 As above - if the off-street requirement is 2 per housing unit and one per ADU, that
probably works. Our street (78th) does not allow on-street parking - which would need
enforcement
48 There's not much street parking as is my neighborhood. I suppose if every lot added a
unit, it might become a problem. But that seems very unlikely
49 We have no parking on our street. Going to be horrible with cars parked all over lots or
jamming up streets next to us that allow parking.
50 Parking spaces should be within the property areas such as driveway or garage. Off
street parking should be strongly discouraged except for parties or gatherings.
51 More cars on the street obviously
52 I would not want additional cars parked along the street.
53 limit this to ADUs
55 not worried
56 I think it will be terrible. Current residents barely have enough parking for themselves
and guests in certain areas of our city. Multi unit housing usually equals multiple cars
often more than one per resident. We don't want our city to end up looking like
downtown Bellevue or dense housing where people park on the streets all the time.
58 I don't know if street parking is allowed overnight in Medina. No problem if that's the
regulation
59 Like other neighborhoods our streets will become crowded with parked cars, boats,
trailers, campers. At night youth will sit in those cars playing music and talking loudly.
60 I don't think it would be a problem. , maybe street parking may not have enough parking
or during winter months and plowing of snow.
61 I think additional parking restrictions will need to be enacted to help. Zone permits with a
limit per lot?
ResponseID Response
41
61
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
62 I think it is awful.
63 Depends where the housing is. Much of Medina does not offer street parking
65 I like the limited amount of street parking in Medina - it keeps our streets uncluttered,
gives the area a neighborhood feel and makes it more walkable
66 The same concerns. This does not change my opinion.
67 Parking is already limited
68 Concerning
69 There is barely any street parking on my street already so not sure where they would
even park. Most open spots get filled with work trucks during the day. Not sure where
they would park.
70 problem
71 Significant impact. There is a lack of parking spaces on public streets as it is. It will
worsen the problem.
72 Parking can already be a challenge, it would be important for the requirement of an extra
space on your property.
73 Street parking will be very tight. The whole neighbor won't look good with cars on the
street
74 Awful! Seattle all over again
75 N/A
76 Parking, and the streets are just not set up to allow for this type of building
77 issues with cars in the ROW. I want to see smaller streets and less paving to keep the
village type feeling.
78 parking safety and more cars on the streets
79 Alot of the streets in Medina can not accomodate this type of parking spaces
80 There will be way too many cars on the streets.
82 The two parking per unit and one per ADU should work and maybe some additional
street parking with a permit should hopefully work. There should probably be additional
no overnight parking in more quiet streets to preserve that
ResponseID Response
42
62
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
83 People will be long term parking in front of other properties
84 THere isn't space for this.Unless the middle housing units are small enough to allow for
the space needed for all the parking.
85 No concerns
86 Will ADUs be used as a corporate or other business office with clients coming in and out,
generating more traffic or parking in neighborhood spaces (in front of people's homes)?
87 All of the above!
88 Parking would get MUCH worse. We'd have cars all over the neighborhood which would
decrease the desirability of living here and would depress home values.
89 Street parking. Crowded streets. Traffic safety.
90 Traffic safety
91 It would seem to me that Medina would become just another over crowded, lack of
parking neighborhood like those in Seattle.
92 Seems there would be much more hard surfaces on the lots. Drainage and surface water
runoff concerns in an area where we have drainage issues already.
93 congestions unless roads are widened,
94 I don't know enough to have any concerns here. I would have thought that to be enough
parking, until this question came up.
95 Do not allow street parking.
96 It will destroy it
97 It would become an annoying parking lot environment
99 Still don't want it but the recent state legislation would hopefully derail builders from
building middle housing units.
101 As long as it does not add to on street parking.
103 I would like to keep parking off the street as much as possible
105 Parking and traffic is already a concern. WA state's anti-car agenda is unrealistic and will
be strongly opposed.
106 Crowded street parking
ResponseID Response
43
63
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
107 Amount of land covered with asphalt - drainage problems!
108 We don't have street parking available in our neighborhood. The road doesn't allow for
passing (Medina Circle).
109 I don't know where all the new people would park------our beautiful city is not designed
to accommodate this heavy volume of parking and people in middle housing will bring
lots of cars and all of the associated problems with them to our streets.
110 They will park on the street anyway.
111 Right now the off-street parking is very regulated so as long as it stays that way, I've no
concerns. So it depends on how this will be regulated. It could potentially become a
concern.
112 People have already blocked public parking spots on 80th NE and you've done nothing
113 I don't think street parking is an issue.
115 Congestion. Loss of open space.
116 More cars and off site parking will clearly have negative effects, just as we have seen in
Kirkland and parts of Seattle where ADU's have been developed, marketed, and sold.
117 People are already parking illegally on the street. This would make it worse.
118 NO 'middle housing' should be considered
119 maybe other neighbors concerned or not really.
120 Will the increased parking be sufficient for the expected population growth?
121 Will cars park on street?
122 Parking is a problem as no street parking is allowed on our street.
123 Medina is in the suburbs and bus and train service are on the perimeter of the city. A lot
of residents have/need two vehicles even in an ADU.
124 It will make already limited street parking worse
125 parking in general
ResponseID Response
44
64
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
126 There is very little room to park on the street at the present time so this is only going to
get worse. Not many people in Medina use transit and the Park & Ride is usually full very
early in the morning. We may need to consider more parking by permit only along
Medina streets. At the north end of EPR, we have had numerous years of new
construction as well as long remodels of homes. Many of the workers park on the street
leaving no space for residents to have their guests park. If there are construction
mitigation plans required, they do not seem to be enforced. Medina has not helped the
situation by designing the new sidewalk construction in areas like 24th and 10th that
added more planted areas (that no one maintains), and resulted in fewer vehicles being
able to park.
127 Since we dont have normal-width streets with sidewalks and street parking, this is a
huge concern!
128 I am worried that medina will pass new laws or loopholes for contractors to get past this
and allow more cars.
129 32nd Street has no street parking available. Not sure what that means for this issue
130 I don't like cars, RV's, etc. on the street or visible from the street
131 Overnight Street parking is not allowed on our street so I don't know how they could
accommodate this
132 The whole law is not acceptable.
133 There are very few cars parked on our street; obviously that would change!
134 Parking could be a real issue. It already is in some areas.
135 Safety and air pollution
136 none
137 It concerns me.
138 NA
139 Traffic concerns
140 Availability of mass transit will be much more important. Smaller, on-demand or fixed-
rout buses (vans, really) that get people from all parts of Medina to/from the 520 transit
stops will support single-car families.
142 more parking on the street , more illegal parking
143 I don't see how all this comes together with limited infrastructure and concerns about a
warming planet and need for trees to help mediate.
ResponseID Response
45
65
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
144 That on street parking with become more common/dangerous with seeing
bikers/walkers/making streets more narrow
146 Random street parking will be a big issue.
147 Increased concern regarding parking.
148 So long as there is no parking allowed on streets, there is no concern.
149 Street parking or dedicated parking lots need to be made available to avoid congestion
and vehicle safety
150 traffic impacts, land use
153 test
155 Everything mentioned in question 4
156 I am not concerned about parking. There seems to be plenty of parking. When is the last
time you tried to go somewhere and could't find a parking spot? Correct, never.
157 None
158 And don't know
159 Parking issues
160 Not enough space
161 With limited street parking on several streets, this would add to more congestion on
those streets with spaces
162 No Space available
164 People will ignore the rules and more traffic and parking will show up.
165 I'm not happy.
166 Change in character
167 If we built an AdU do I need to have a parking spot ? Does it have to be in the as garage.?
168 This will cause more street parking and congestion.
169 It should not be permitted
170 To many cars on streets
ResponseID Response
46
66
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
171 Thank you very much
172 If the housing is higher density as in an apartment building, the parking issues will be a
problem. You already can't park on the west side of evergreen point road which limits
parking and if you did open it up it would narrow the streets too much for easy traffic
flow.
173 Currently Medina does not allow street parking in our neighborhood. I guess this would
change.
174 We don't have enough parking already. This legislation seems like it's for more urban
places where there is room for parking garages
175 Parking on streets will ruin our neighborhood with noise pollution, air pollution and
charm of beautiful medina
176 We already have a problem with street parking in my neighborhood.
177 Where will the new residents park?
178 It would be nice if these were built closer to transportation hubs.
179 Medina should definitely require 2 off street parking stalls per ADU.
180 This could lead to additional street parking. Our street is narrow and I would be
concerned about flow of traffic.
181 Overcrowding of street parking on narrower streets.
182 Two seems reasonable and 1 per ADU.
183 community roads will be full of cars, reasult in traffic jam and noisy, also it's bad for
children safety
184 I want to maintain the current regulation in Medina City
185 Parking is already a problem in our city. Not wide enough streets and or spaces created
for parking.
186 It leads to more street parking and likely attract criminals. However, more off-street
parking for ADH increase the hard surface area and I am concern about the
environmental impact of not enough stormwater drainage.
187 I don't think Medina needs this type of housing. Medina already have the parking issue.
This will only worsen the problem.
188 Not supporting middle house in general
ResponseID Response
47
67
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
189 We don't want parked cars lined up on the streets.
190 Definitely do not look forward to more cars parked on streets.
191 Parking issues galore
192 Safety, inadequate infrastructure and crime
193 there would not be enough parking and the community will become too congested.
194 Where are we supposed to come up with street parking when there is none right now?
Will the city take back its right away from existing properties?
195 None
196 Not sure what to think but more parking should be built in to a multi housing property if
possible.
197 Important to require maximum parking allowed
199 Where are the parking spaces to be located- on property or street? Not clear
200 Parking
201 There is not enough parking in our streets.
203 It doesnt match city code
204 I don't want to see cars parked on streets, if they can't fit in driveways, they shouldn't
build it
205 Overcrowding, particularly in the schools. Our streets are already subject to speeding
and drivers who are not versed in the legal way to drive. Again, is there no court
challenge to this ridiculous plan poorly designed by the state?
206 I'm confused by this. Will multiple residents be parking on the main streets?
207 I worry about the impact of random cars parking on the street impacting the ethos of the
neighborhood.
208 None
209 I hope the city at least will enforce the maximum parking requirements rather than
granting exceptions to developers.
210 If that is the case, I would mandate parking structures for every middle house build,
minimum of a two car garage for each unit.
ResponseID Response
48
68
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
49
69
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
8. The City of Medina cannot create design guidelines for middle housing
types without also applying the same design guidelines to single-family
residences. Would you be supportive or opposed to the City of Medina
adopting design guidelines for all housing in Medina?
33% Strongly Support
23% Slightly Support
21% Strongly Opposed
15% Neutral / No Opinion
9% Slightly Opposed
Value Percent Responses
Strongly Support
Slightly Support
Strongly Opposed
Neutral / No Opinion
Slightly Opposed
Totals: 150
33.3%50
22.7%34
20.7%31
14.7%22
8.7%13
50
70
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Statistics
Total Responses 150
51
71
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
9. The state legislature is using middle housing to diversify housing supply
and increase housing affordability. The City of Medina has been allocated
housing affordability targets by the region that must be met by 2044.
Middle housing can be a more affordable housing type depending on how
it’s implemented. This can look like reducing barriers to development or
incentivizing certain middle housing types to reduce costs. Should the city
use Middle Housing to address housing affordability?
61% No20% Neutral / No Opinion
19% Yes
Value Percent Responses
No
Neutral / No Opinion
Yes
Totals: 150
60.7%91
20.0%30
19.3%29
52
72
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Statistics
Total Responses 150
53
73
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Item
Overall
Rank Rank Distribution Score
No. of
Rankings
Multifamily zone 1 346 125
Middle housing with additional
subslides
2 339 121
Other 3 290 104
Tiny home communities 4 236 126
Statistics
Total Responses 141
10. To meet the regionally allocated affordability targets, the City of
Medina has been informed that it will need to update its zoning. Possible
options identified during the comprehensive planning process include
zoning for multifamily, middle housing with subsidies, or tiny home
communities. Please rank these options from highest (1) to lowest support
(4)
Lowest
Rank
Highest
Rank
54
74
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
ResponseID Response
16 Possibly if several adjacent lots in the same block were developed with similar, cohesive
designs the homes may look more intentional and like they fit in, distributing pockets of
duplexes or cottages throughout Medina.
18 Annex land in Eastern WA where land is cheap and low cost housing could be built there
20 I think we should look at our set back criteria and make the set backs greater than they
currently stand. this will allow more protection on how the housing is built
21 Re-zone the Medina Chevron for an affordable housing unit.
23 smart people know that affordable housing is not possible in Medina due to land values -
the end game assuming the state continues to cram this down will have to be non-
market solutions, like subsidized housing, and at that point, it will be...
30 Would like to see cottage communities (say six to ten units) targeted to our low income
seniors and/or workforce housing for teachers or city employees. Would likely require
subsidies from the State or other entities supporting this type of housing. City can't
subsidize
38 Medina may already have a significant number of houses with ADUs. To make inventory
of houses with built in ADU and maybe that already puts city within the guidelines.
40 Prioritize ADU-type construction over townhouses, duplexes or multi-level (height)
construction.
11. Do you have other ideas on how the city of Medina can meet its
affordable housing targets? If so, explain here:
housingmedina
affordablestatehousescity
community homes
or
people
area
built
communities expensive
land
unitadu
affordabilitycreate
duplexesincome
live
middleproperty
0
55
75
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
41 explore public land options for affordable housing development
45 Allowing existing houses to be converted to Duplexes
49 No- it's unrealistic
50 ask for extension/push back the timeline to allow more community inputs
51 Protest and refuse to comply with this tyranny
53 there are no market based solutions and reasonable people understanf this.
55 allow ADU's
56 I think reducing setbacks to allow for two or more single family homes per lot might be a
better option
58 Allow a few small condo buildings in one small area that could be zoned that way
59 Not yet
60 Tiny homes community
61 Donate a piece of land to be developed for a qualified senior cottage community.
66 No, increasing density will not make it more affordable on a per square foot basis only
lower the perceived cost per dwelling unit.
67 Rezone nursery, condos near park.
69 It's expensive to live here, so I wonder how it can be made affordable for people that
aren't able to pay that much.
71 Lawsuit challenging the state
75 No ideas. Sorry!
78 create incentives for adding ADUs new builds
84 Educate residents about the homeless and low income families in the area and that many
of these children attend area schools (Clyde Hill ELementary, etc). Medina residents
don't understand lifestyle outside of their own and need to broaden their tolerance of
people and also realize the neighborhood is impossible for our children to purchase
homes - it's too expensive. Stop allowing huge mansions
ResponseID Response
56
76
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
85 The priority should always be housing affordability. Housing should be a human right
and it is a basic necessity. Housing should not be a way to generate wealth, it shouldn't
be a part of our capitalistic system.
86 Can we as a community create affordable housing for our teachers and city employees?
For instance, Lakeside School purchased neighboring homes for their teachers. Would
this be a possibility?
96 Such a bad idea everything else is dwelling in it
97 No
101 Let's become the state of Medina.
105 Medina is not supposed to be affordable you absolute clowns.
106 No
111 This is the first time I'm hearing about the affordable housing targets, would like to know
more about this.
112 No
116 Affordablility is a relative to macro and micro economic factors that should be not be
"managed" by the state. For Medina specifically, a 700 SF ADU at $1.10 will be
"affordable" compared to larger properties but will not be affordable by typical metrics.
To create affordability, Medina (and all the cities on the Eastside) would have to subsidize
housing to meet target gross income numbers. We will not find support in Medina for
thiese initiatives.
118 instead of 'middle house' to the exiseted community, using the free lands building houses
for needs
119 n/a
123 Medina has very expensive housing. Meeting affordability targets will be a challenge.
124 Work to repeal the law in Olympia
126 There is very little available land in Medina. It seems unlikely that any developer can
aquire enough land to do a small multifamily unit but that would be the least obtrusive.
130 encourage multi-generational family living
131 Allow for it but require sewer and other utility hook ups to be very expensive for a
second unit.
132 Ignore them
ResponseID Response
57
77
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
133 Sue the state to fight this requirement. Medina is not meant to be affordable. There are
plenty of communities that are much more affordable and wouldn't be nearly as affected
by increased housing density.
135 Reject and refuse to comply
140 Refuse any more merging of lots without a commitment to increase housing stock in
some other way.
142 utilize areas that already have transitional housing such as NE 28th along 520
143 Stacked flats to decrease lot coverage.
144 I'd lover to see a focus on disability communities, such as non-profit groups for disabled
adults.
148 Lower property taxes.
150 Let the market be free
155 If someone can't afford to live in Medina they can live somewhere else
157 Don't have an HOA
162 By implementing clauses that the property owner must reside on the property that puts
up the multi
164 Ignore the state and wait to get sued. Fight the blanket law.
165 Put a cap on what realtors can charge per square foot so regulate houses are more
affordable
170 Silly question. But will go with reduced property taxes
171 No
173 3 bedroom row houses or brownstones for middle housing, with studio ground floor
apartments for affordable.
174 Use Medina Park to build a housing development with condos?
176 We have too many houses that are purchased by people and are allowed to sit vacant.
179 Change the heighth restriction rules so the measuring point is not the city street.
182 Do not know enough about the target and what is meant. But not for paying people to
live in middle housing (subsidizing)
ResponseID Response
58
78
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
184 We should simply reject the state request as Medina is a small city not like Bellevue or
Redmond which has capability to adapt more population
185 zone a specific area only.
186 lower property tax, repurpose certain area for tiny home communities
192 Exclude Medina from the mandate and double the requirements to another part of
Washington
193 We don't have to meet any targets.
194 We desperately need design review and actual tree protection. The homes being built
now are horrendous. The city could allow ADU's review
197 Fairweather Park
199 No
203 What are the targets? I have several questions
207 Acquire and refine the nursery as a tiny home community.
210 Allow floating houses to be moored to the 520 floating bridge.
ResponseID Response
59
79
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
ResponseID Response
12 Around 24th street.
13 No area is realistic without destroying what makes Medina special.
16 Along 12th. North of 24th. NE 7th.
17 Between 24th st and SR 520
18 Buy some land in Eastern King County and have cheaper housing there. No joke.
19 The gas station area.
20 waterfront properties that sit on the lake with long driveways. There is usually quite a bit
of property that could be used for housing that would not be disruptive to the adjacent
neighbors
21 The current lot where Medina Chevron is located. The 84th Ave side of Medina Nursery.
Both are best for access to public transportation and would limit broader community
impact.
23 i don't believe it is possible to have affordable housing here and that is ok. why elected
officials decided this one size fits all is beyond reason. so in summary, I reject the
premise.
25 Not enough info to say
12. Where in the city would be most acceptable to you for a zoning change
to allow more opportunities for affordable housing? Please provide the
general area, cross streets, or other identifying information.
medina024thnorth
84th
area
bellevue
or
circle housing
park
city
street christian
close evergreen
golf
ne
access
nursery
school
south 12th
stationtransportation
60
80
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
30 The Bellevue School District owned property currently occupied by Bellevue Christian
would provide easy access to public transportation. The Wells Medina property
31 golf course, probably the least usage per city general population.
32 The golf course.
35 North Medina areas Near the freeway, 76 station to Bellevue Christian , park and ride ,
wells Medina
37 not sure
38 Around NE 24th and NE 12th Street, close to 84th Ave NE
40 NOT 78th, 79th or 80th Ave north of 24th and south of 520. Existing city zoning and
building codes already exceed what these lots can accommodate. Consider a small zone
closest to 520 mass transit, such as 28th to the street that borders the nature preserve.
Or 10th and 12th, to the east of 84th, which is closest to Bellevue and bus transit.
41 The eastern edge of Medina Park, east of 84th on NE 10th
45 Near bus stops/ bus routes and the freeway for easy access for non car owners
47 along 520 like in the 76 station, Medina Circle area or 3 points school (or north side of
520 from that)
48 Near the 520 bus station and near the police station.
49 Medina circle area
50 lots size >32,000
52 Along eastern border of city near freeway
53 nowhere. the only way affordable housing will ever exist here will be through huge
subsidies, which will create safety issues.
55 anywhere
56 I really can't say beyond the streets where street parking is actually available
58 Near 520 or near downtown (both areas afford easy access to transportation)
59 Near schools and existing commercial properties.
60 Can't answer that question not so familiar with all of area
ResponseID Response
61
81
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
61 Can we buy a piece of OGCC for a qualified senior housing cottage community?
65 Medina Circle - its proximate to the highway so it makes provides commuting options for
lower income residents and somewhat separated from the rest of Medina (the only entry
or exit is via 84th Ave so its already like a separate area and would have less impact on
the rest of the community (ie it would minimize the traffic impact).
66 Around City Hall and Post office where there is already a commercial building
67 Near park and on nursery site
68 I do not want affordable housing, but if it was required I would put it by the chevron city
at the border of Medina. So it's not inside the city.
69 EPR and 24th towards 520. It seems like there are more neighborhood type house there
already. A lot of Medina is more spread out with one big house in the middle of the lot.
71 Closer to the major streets of 84th Ave or 12th Street.
73 Medina nursery, north of Medina, close to Bellevue Christian
75 Boy, that's a tough one. One thought: Between 24th and 520, between Evergreen Pt Rd
and the nursery including site of former middle school. Obviously excluding the golf
course.
77 North of NE 12th and west of golf course where there is already town home style homes
next to the walking path. Near Chevron gas. On Lake WA BLVD between 10th and 12th.
Along 10th west of St Thomas In Medina Circle Next to SR 520 Next to schools and
churches we have Next to Green Store
78 Medina Circle
82 Along 12th street and leading into 1st street in Bellevue And Close to 520
83 Medina circle and west to Evergreen point road
84 Near Medina park, where there are already the condo units.
86 Possibly close to our various schools, notably near Bellevue Christian.
88 Eastland or Medina Heights or Medina Point or North of 24th St. just West of 84th.
90 North of 24th and South of 520
91 Perhaps the largest lots need to be considered first.
92 Medina Circle
ResponseID Response
62
82
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
94 There is no employment in Medina. It is most sensible to me to create affordable housing
near the 520.
96 Nowhere
97 Next to 520
99 I don't see anywhere that isn't near a school so an opinion here is useless
101 West of Evergreen Point Road
105 Nowhere. We will oppose.
106 North end, near 520
109 eliminate bellevue christian school and rezone that area. if need more space, go south of
there and east of evergreen point road until 24th street. maybe eliminate the nursery and
use bellevue circle.
110 Streets near 520
112 Next to bill gates
113 Can a zoning change be made for all of Medina?
116 Bellevue SD property south of 520.
117 Maybe west of 84th and north of 24th. Let's not make Medina like Seattle; we live in
Medina for a reason to avoid Seattle and now Bellevue problems.
118 this is a bad question. you are creating conflicts among people in the current community.
NO 'middle housing' to Medina! Keep single-family communities! Save tradition and
America's culture!
119 evergreen estates
120 Take over (purchase or eminent domain??) part of the golf course?
123 On the south side of the 520 freeway.
124 Replace St Thomas School, Church & Medina Park
125 north of 24th to 520
ResponseID Response
63
83
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
126 If the city owned the Bellevue Christian School site, it would be a possible area for multi
family that is close to the freeway and to transit. It is unlikely that people looking for
middle housing actually work in Medina so they need access to get to jobs in neighboring
areas.
127 Areas closest to the 520 corridor to minimize local neighborhood street traffic
128 The area across from the playground/tennis courts next to the path. There was originally
low income housing in that area and there is a large common yard you can build some
smaller homes on.
130 Around Medina Elementary School
131 I don't support it but Medina circle is the only logical given its access to public
transportation, the bike path and gas station
132 Nowhere
133 As noted above, Medina should fight this.
134 perhaps more of the flat surfaces around Medina park, Medina Elementary, St Thomas,
and near 520
135 Have no thought about this
136 The area north of NE 24th St, south of NE 28th St,, east of Evergreen Pt Road and west
of 84th
138 NIMBY! North of NE 24th
140 All of it. The first area should be along the 520 corridor, where mass transit is already
available. Also the parts of Medina close to 84th, because that's a transit corridor.
142 NE 28th street that runs parallel to 520 leading down to 84th.
143 Affordable or low income housing? Low income housing needs would probably be best
met around the Evergreen 520 lid for access to transportation.
144 No opinion
147 In the southeastern corner of the city
148 Along Evergreen Point Road, to add balance and harmony to the city.
149 Around the golf course
150 none
ResponseID Response
64
84
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
155 absolutely nowhere.
156 Either all of Medina should have those opportunities or none of Medina.
157 You can keep the lakefront properties unaffected, but the interiors can change
159 North point area near 520, near Bellevue Christian.
162 NO WHERE
164 On 12th next to the gas station.
165 Near Medina Nursery or Medina Circle
169 All if medina should be considered, don't feel like certain areas should be more affected
by these new laws.
170 Medina circle by 520 bridge
171 Seattle Washington
173 Close to businesses and transportation. 520 corridor. All along the street between 520
and queen B. By the gas stations. On the road by Bellevue Christian and 520.
174 Park area or areas closest to the park because there is a major road there going out of the
city
175 Replace golf course
176 You don't have the guts to take on the wealthier neighborhoods so we all know that
answer is going to be Medina Heights and Overlake. We should allow ADUs
everywhere.
178 Given transportation and other development, one would have to say near the 520 and
Bellevue Christian, like between 24th and 28th between 78th and 80th. and near the
Chevron and Medina Park.
179 1. Build a bigger lid over 520. 2. Between 24th and 520 3 Fairweather Park
180 North of Overlake Golf Course and south of 520 Medina Heights Around Medina
Elementary
182 North of NE 24 to 520. Also South of NE 12 to overlake drive. I would also say the lots
on evergreen point tend to be large and could accommodate more housing without too
much impact.
183 Only very big lot should be allowed to build multiple units.
ResponseID Response
65
85
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
184 No where. I prefer to keep Medina as it is
185 Near the 520
186 medina chevron, 76 gas station, Wells Medina Nursery on 24th st, medina circle, NE
corner of overlake golf club, BCS three points campus
187 No
190 Locations near current transit access points.
192 By 520 west of 24th towards Clyde Hill
193 This does not make sense because the land is too expensive to make this affordable
194 I tried to edit my answer to the last question and it got submitted by accident. We could
allow ADUs or cottages as accessory dwellings to existing or new developments but it
must be accompanied by city wide design review and true tree protection and
preservation as opposed to what is happening now.
196 Near the park or near the nursery? I don't know.
197 Fairweather park
199 Close to Medina park and off main arteries (84th, 8th).
203 Along the 520
205 Use the Nursery property to build townhomes, then annex them to Clyde Hill.
206 As close to the edges of the city as possible
207 North east edge edge along 84th.
210 SR520 and 84th, put it over the lid.
ResponseID Response
66
86
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
ResponseID Response
13 Stricter enforcement of relevant laws and more police.
16 Possibly require parking permits?
17 Possibly stickers for residents so that only residents can park on the street during certain
hours like they do in some neighborhoods in Seattle
18 Start requiring that cars for Medina residents have a yearly permit. The cost of those
permits could be $5 except $500 for multifamily homes larger than a duplex.
19 Maintaining no overnight street parking.
21 More enforcement of traffic violations, especially speeding on Evergreen Point Road and
NE 16th Street. Perhaps opening up access to the Golf Club from 84th Ave.
23 traffic cameras that issue speeding tickets.
25 The area around St Thomas School already has traffic issues.
26 I would mandate that lots need to provide parking for their structures.
27 Require cars to be a garage.
13. The construction of additional housing units in Medina would lead to
an increased number of vehicles on local streets, which will have an
impact on both parking and traffic. What initial ideas would you suggest
for addressing the eventual parking and/or traffic needs that will result
from additional housing units in your neighborhood?
parkingstreetmedinatraffic
park
carshousingrequire
constructionpermits
streetsadditional
bus
unitsallowed
areas
city
or
vehicles bellevuelimit
speed
12th
0
84th
67
87
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
30 Tighter regulations on street parking. Not all streets are wide enough to accommodate
parking.
31 underground parking garage
32 more lanes on 84th Ave.
35 Parking permits by neighborhood
37 not sure
38 Medina was not designed for such a significant population increase.
40 Each building should have a corresponding parking spots, (2 for main home and 1 for
ADU?), but this might require Medina to require new pervious parking solutions.
41 Consider allowing additional housing units in Medina along the lines above, developing
the eastern edge of Medina Park, and properties on the south side on NE 10th east of
84th
44 Builders should be required to allow for two off-street spots for each unit.
45 Street parking should be freely allowed. The current rules are excessively restrictive. I
think the streets can accommodate the extra traffic. Have a bus route that runs through
Medina to access more areas
48 Traffic in Medina is basically non-existent except for kid drop off and pickup at the
schools and construction projects. We'd have to add an enormous amount of new
housing units before everyday traffic would be an issue. Parking might have to be limited
by permit in more places (as is done with the "park-n-hide" areas now.
49 If you must do street parking then do resident permit only.
50 Limit off street parking spaces per household
52 Having construction crews park offsite and be bussed in to job site. I know that this has
happened before.
55 i'm not worried
56 I think permitted parking for residents and limited construction worker parking. It's
primarily construction vehicles that are parked up and down NE 12th every day. I also
think a light at the five ways intersection by Chevron needs to be considered and better
traffic management for Bellevue Christian and St. Thomas parents doing drop off and
pick up other students. I also believe that more speed limit interactive signage would be
helpful.
ResponseID Response
68
88
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
58 I think the traffic impact would be minimal except at high traffic times. Install traffic lights
as necessary. If not already a regulation, forbid street parking at night.
60 Driveway per unit
61 Zone parking permits with a limited number of vehicles allowed for each lot.
65 Ensure as much onsite parking as legally allowed for new dwellings, isolate new
construction to areas that are proximate to entry and exit from Medina (Medina Circle,
Lake Washington Blvd etc).
66 There will need to be underground parking structures.
67 Underground parking at nursery rezone condos
68 Yes, make construction workers bus into the city.
69 They would have to find a way to turn drainage ditches into street parking spots.
71 Permit parking.
75 require two spaces on property per unit. Otherwise, no idea.
77 Don't make streets any larger. Keep streets small and quaint. Park off streets on gravel or
grass.
78 reroute the bike path so it goes down 84th instead of Evergreen Point Road. that should
be done regardless
82 Maybe mandate garages for multi family houses?
83 regulations concerning "continuing" parking in front of someone else's property
84 No idea. Its nearly impossible to find parking for any city events unless using the school
lots and/or biking.
85 Speed bumps. Racing is a huge problem throughout the county, so the police need to put
a stop to that and look out for it. It would also be nice if the bus stopped throughout
Medina, and if the bus went more places, so that people could utilize public transit rather
than individual cars.
90 Better marked and enforced steer parking and no- parking zones.
91 Our street in particular is already skinny and has no parking. I don't see a great resolution
for us.
92 It should have to be allowed on the lot, not on the street
ResponseID Response
69
89
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
94 Incentivize lower vehicle density with a property-tax credit for residences that have
fewer vehicles.
96 Please don't do that
97 Haven't given it a lot of thought. Busing construction workers in. Finding area for
construction parking only. Alternative work schedules for contractors.
101 on owners property parking only>
103 Even the smallest lots in medina have room for off st parking. we should not turn the
whole city into NE 12th by the park.
106 None
109 where parking is regulated by time, change to 24 hours. allow parking on all streets
where space can be made available.
111 Regarding parking: all new development must include a driveway for parking spot(s).
112 Address the issue of people blocking use of current parking spaces.
113 Place limits on construction vehicles. I think the biggest impact on parking and traffics is
vehicles related to construction and landscaping. Do individuals (especially developers)
have to provide for parking for construction vehicles when they submit permits for new
construction?
116 This problem cannot be solved given the provisions and mandates specified in HB1110
and HB1337. Medina should mandate on site parking as much as possible in any code
changes and development performance standards.
117 Do not allow it. These kinds of rules are more appropriate for llarger cities like Bellevue,
Kirkland and Redmond that already have multi-unit housing, businesses and a lot more
space.
118 NO 'middle housing' to Medina! Keep single-family communities! Save tradition and
America's culture!
119 n/a
120 Increase public transportation options, including possibly a shuttle from the Park & Ride
to a light rail station, additional bus routes?
122 Are roads cannot be made much wider and by adding more cars to it causes problems at
all the stops, 4way stops etc.
123 Require 2 onsite parking spaces for each middle house & ADU.
ResponseID Response
70
90
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
124 Make a parking lot in Medina Park
125 speed bumps on overlake dr and evergreen to prevent speeding
126 More police presence to enforce speeding. Speed bumps or stop signs where there are
long stretches of a roadway. Additional sidewalks for safety as many people walk for
exercise and some areas have sidewalks in need of repairs (EPR btw. 24th and the
overpass park) or have no sidewalks (EPR north of the overpass park). Some possible
parking areas appear to be easements in front of homes and currently have No Parking
signs or large boulders, plus the surface is a mud pit when we have wet weather. They
could be improved and maintained by the City. More local parking should be designated
for local use in busy areas and require permits or temporary guest passes which could be
provided to residents and used by their guests or temporary workers at their properties.
127 Probably need to require all homes (or new developments) to include 2 off-street parking
spots even if on homeowner land. The city needs to be flexible on the type of such
parking (ie, gravel, grass, grasspave, etc)
128 I think we keep the laws the same and if they need a car, they can use the park and ride
to store their extra cars. The construction companies should have to van employees in
and out so the streets aren't filled with trucks.
130 Mandate all cars and licensed vehicles must be out-of-sight from the street. Hide them
behind your Middle House.
131 Tax property owners that have multiple units to discourage development
132 Keep the zoning changes on the main through streets
133 As noted above, Medina should fight this!
134 Could permit process perhaps allow staggering the developments to manage the load
better?
135 Restrictions on the number of cars for each home
136 Traffic management plans should be constantly updated with the building permit
process for these new homes.
140 Increase presence of mass transit throughout Medina. For construction traffic, require off-
site parking and shuttle service for workers.
142 Don't cause the parking problems in the first place.
143 Haven't a clue. Maybe the state legislature has some ideas and will be willing to fund
them!
ResponseID Response
71
91
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
144 Lower speed limits, more traffic control systems/protected bike lanes, more police
actually ticketing locals instead of letting the speeding slide.
148 Maintain no on street parking. Increase bus routes through city to reduce commuting cars.
Maintain speed limits the same as now to maintain safety. Frankly it is not going to add a
noticeable number of vehicles compared to current pass through and school traffic.
150 oppose changes
155 not having affordable housing in the first place.
156 You are assuming there would be traffic jams and little parking, but I do not think that
would be the case. There is little traffic now and so much parking that the increase would
not be impactful.
157 The traffic is completely fine
162 Annex the streets that are divided for instance on 12th the north side belongs to Clyde
Hill and further down Lake Washington Boulevard where the other side of the street is
Bellevue
164 Nothing you can do. More parking and traffic will show up.
165 Don't construct additional units
170 Wider streets. Remove the work done on 12th
171 It is important to have designated parking spaces for each client in can be built
underground
172 Permits required for street parking.
173 One way streets with parking on either side feeding into the main streets that won't have
parking but will have traffic going in both directions.
174 Take away no parking signs-although that would be bad-may be the only way. It's going
to look like the ave.
175 Middle housing should have limited vehicles per unit
176 Sell street parking permits.
178 Enforce the parking rules we have now. I would like to make sure developers keep
streets clean and only work during allowed hours.
179 Prohibit on street parking. Require 2 off street parking stalls per ADU
180 Sidewalks for better pedestrian safety
ResponseID Response
72
92
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
182 Allow more street parking and require off street parking for units as described earlier.
Likely would need some permitting mechanism as people tend to want to park here and
take the bus on 520 or into Bellevue
183 Look how busy are the roads in Bellevue in recent years, there is no simple way to do it
185 Carve out specific parking areas
186 build those additional housing near area close to public transportation so residents don't
need to have cars. Let full self driving cars solve the problem of needing a parking space.
190 Underground parking for any multifamily units
192 Sell Permits and reduce taxes to those that currently live in Medina
193 Do not add any additional housing units
194 Limit the number of cars to the amount of parking that the lot can suppprt.
196 Add sidewalks everywhere so it's safe to walk and esp for kids!!!!!!
197 Limit street parking
199 Limit parking on street.
203 Have to park offsite and get bused in
205 No street parking should be allowed. Park in the "affordable" housing areas. Increased
bus service on periphery of Medina.
206 My initial idea is to leave the state as soon as possible.
207 Place higher density units near the 520 transit hub.
210 Mandate garages for every middle house build. Mandate additional driving instruction or
school for anyone living in middle housing to ensure they understand the rules of the
road.
ResponseID Response
73
93
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
14. With additional vehicles on the road, the City can take action to
preserve safe streets in our community. Which of the following strategies
would you support to reduce traffic stress? Please select all that apply.
Percent
Traffic
calming
measures
(includes
narrowing
roads,
adding
speed
humps,
roundabouts,
and more)
Increase
active
transportation
network
(includes
initiatives
that
promote
walking,
biking,
rolling,
and
running)
Other:
Please
Specify
Promote
or expand
public
transportation
0
20
40
60
80
Value Percent Responses
Traffic calming measures (includes narrowing roads,
adding speed humps, roundabouts, and more)
Increase active transportation network (includes
initiatives that promote walking, biking, rolling, and
running)
Other: Please Specify
Promote or expand public transportation
63.4%83
35.9%47
32.1%42
31.3%41
74
94
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Statistics
Skipped 23
Total Responses 131
Other: Please Specify Count
Add multipurpose lanes where possible for walkers/runners/bikes 1
Add visual reminders: flashing lights around Dead End signs.1
Adding sidewalks, radar signage 1
Bad decidion 1
Charge a fee for construction vehicles 1
Do not cause the problem in the first place.1
Evergreen Point transit parking needs to be expanded! It is already inadequate for demand.
Ridiculous! We should have ample parking for those taking transit.
1
Flaggers for construction traffic 1
Increase police presence and enforce current laws.1
Limit cars to 1 per home owner 1
Limit parking on street (number of space, limited hours)1
More police patrol of speeders. It's already a problem and it will only get worse.1
More police presence and ticketing of speeders.1
NO 'middle housing' to Medina! Keep single-family communities! Save tradition and America's
culture!
1
NOT "CALMING" measures please!! These make congestion worse, not better.1
Neighborhood electric transport 1
No speed bumps but round abouts.1
No speed bumps, please. More traffic violation enforcement.1
Totals 42
75
95
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
None of the above 1
None of these 1
Not having affordable housing in the first place 1
Not sure 1
Parking will be the least of the issue 1
Please no more roundabouts and please cite people for running stop signs. I see this all the time
now whereas I didn't see this in the past. The bike lanes in Seattle proper are dangerous.
1
SIDEWALK on Overlake Dr E!1
See comment above 1
See previous question answer 1
Shuttle or.van service 1
Sidewalks 1
Speed bumps and rough patches, particularly at intersections and near the school.1
Street permit parking.1
The less the city do the better, any construction will make it worse, let the traffic adapt to
existing road, stop wasting money.
1
Totally against roundabouts and traffic calming…lead to more problems not less in my opinion.
Overblown fear of extra housing impacts on traffic.
1
Vigorous enforecement of the traffic laws by the police.1
We really need to turn the 5-way intersection @ 84th & 12th into a roundabout!1
Wider roads. Having schools pay for traffic control for pick up and drop off. Or don't let people
drive to drop off kids. Walk or bus
1
ban on street parking so the streets are wider (do NOT have speed bumps)1
enforce speed limit with cameras 1
install speed cameras and, if necessary, automatically issue tickets 1
Other: Please Specify Count
Totals 42
76
96
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
more sidewalks 1
nothing necessary 1
wider and protected walkways 1
Totals 42
Other: Please Specify Count
77
97
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
15. Which of the following actions would you prefer the City take to
address any possible changes in traffic patterns?
Percent
Protected
walkways Speed
humps Wider
walkways
Roundabouts
Multi-use
paths
Protected
bike lanes
Additional
public
transit
stopsNarrower
roads Bike
Lanes Other:
Please
Specify
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
78
98
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Value Percent Responses
Protected walkways
Speed humps
Wider walkways
Roundabouts
Multi-use paths
Protected bike lanes
Additional public transit stops
Narrower roads
Bike Lanes
Other: Please Specify
55.1%75
46.3%63
45.6%62
35.3%48
27.2%37
21.3%29
19.9%27
18.4%25
17.6%24
12.5%17
Statistics
Skipped 18
Total Responses 136
79
99
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Other: Please Specify Count
Address parking issues.1
Arrange for officers to properly direct traffic during peak hours.1
Do not cause the problem in the first place 1
Enforce pedestrians to use the sidewalks!1
Enforce the law; don't degrade the driving experience for everybody because of a few scofflaws 1
More public walking paths through private property 1
NO 'middle housing' to Medina! Keep single-family communities! Save tradition and America's
culture!
1
No action is preferred.1
Non of the above 1
Parking permits.1
Please do not add speed bumps, roundabouts or narrow roads. I love our streets as-is, which
might be one of the best amenities Medina has to offer homeowners.
1
SIDEWALK esp Overlake Dr E!1
cobblestone stretches to reduce bike speeds 1
don't make any changes 1
enforce speed limit cameras, automatic tickets, reduce speed limit 1
none - all are anti-car 1
radar signage and passive enforcement traffic cameras 1
Totals 17
80
100
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
ResponseID Response
16 Adding more street lights would help cars, pedestrians, and cyclists to be safer.
18 Traffic calming is a Communist-like propaganda term. Many traffic calming features are
harmful for cars on purpose. Speed bumps damage cars (and are hard on driver's backs,
if elderly)
19 I'm deeply concerned that these housing changes will compromise our safety.
21 Keep public transit limited to 84th Ave.
25 No public vehicles in Medina No rounds about
30 Really would hate to see metro buses drive down EPR or through Medina except on 84th
32 It will create traffic jam with more cars on the roads.
37 No
40 Maintain traffic cameras, speed traps, speed reminders.
41 Police presence at peak times is one of the most impactful traffic calming measures.
45 No traffic calming please - too excessive and intrusive. Seems unnecessary. Public transit
route through Medina seems sensible and encourages less car use.
16. Are there any concerns you have about traffic calming measures, active
transportation, or public transit in Medina? If so, please explain
trafficmedina
public
speed
transit
cars
bike bumps people
streetsbus
evergreen
or
bikes
drivinghousing
roads
transportation
area
calming
city
increase
path
point
stop
81
101
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
49 We already have traffic congestion with both elementary schools during pickup and drop
off. Can't imagine it getting any worse. Lots of speeders down 82nd Ave.
52 I'm already concerned with amount of bicycle traffic on Evergreen Point Road after bike
path was finished across 520. Too Many fast cyclists not following road safety rules - not
stopping for stop signs and riding many abreast.
55 any thing you do will make it more of a problem
58 Roundabout on 100th and Belfair is a nightmare so no to any roundabouts. Increase
public transportation (mini bus, etc) to downtown Bellevue and/or transit center when
applicable. This change of housing and impact will be slow. Do not go ahead and narrow
the streets (narrowing streets is a bad idea; check out places in Seattle!), etc, Have some
plans in mind but be ready to modify as things develop.
60 Medina transit is so awesome here in Medina
65 I don't think those traffic calming measures would really be effective. The way to reduce
the traffic impact is putting as much new construction on the edges of the town as
possible where the new residents won't impact interior traffic as much.
69 The worst thing about driving is the bikes that go flying down the streets. Other than
that it's mostly only busy at school pickups and drop offs. Maybe find a way for cars to
not block the roads while they wait. If there are more families taking kids to school here
that will be a problem.
71 I don't want increased public transit.
75 None. All good.
78 adding more public transportation will possibly increase crime
84 Not totally related, but medina and clyde hill police need to educate families about e-bike
laws and the ages children must be. No helmets, 15 mph on roads/sidewalks and the
bike path are creating issues. We don't need to create more people using e-bikes to deal
with any addition of middle housing.
85 I have concerns about noise and unwanted activity from transit stops. The bus stops
would need to be strategically placed.
88 Public transit would increase crime.
91 Over crowding and people not using the measures provided and taking advantage.
92 More public transit, means more access to our community, which typically means more
undesirable elements gaining access.
94 I don't believe any solution will be impactful other than to reduce vehicle density.
ResponseID Response
82
102
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
96 Na
97 No
103 Today St Thomas pick up is complete mayhem, I dont know what it will be like if we
double the number of cars trying to get past
106 Noisy speed bumps
107 Lower speed limits
109 our city and streets are not designed for public transportation. do not expand it
anywhere. the city will have a major conflict with how the streets handle extra traffic and
where do the extra cars park!!!
112 Noise created by speed bumps
113 I am very worried about bicycles and safety. The can by law only yield at stop signs. They
seem to ride down the middle of the street.
117 Way too much government intrusion.
118 NO 'middle housing' to Medina! Keep single-family communities! Save tradition and
America's culture!
119 no
122 The problem with public transportation in Medina is there are no parking lots to leave
your car. You can only walk to and from the bus stop or park in the few spaces on 92nd
street.
124 No
126 There is signage and bollards to try to have cyclists stop and check for traffic before
crossing Evergreen Point Road at the park overpass by the bridge. Most do not slow
down let alone stop. I am surprised there have not been any serious accidents yet. The
bollards should be closer together so cyclists are forced to slow down. Many cyclists turn
onto EPR and head south cycling in the middle of the road, and again, this is likely to
cause an accident. Most never stop at the stop sign for 24th. Perhaps this is a stretch of
roadway that might accomodate a bike path on each side.
128 We already have a traffic problem with Medina Elem since most kids are now driven in
and out of the school and do not live locally. Same with St. Thomas, it can back up the
entire area for people who actually live in the neighborhood. Schools should make plans
to figure out a better way to drop off and pick up.
129 I do not want to see Public transportation on Evergreen Point Road.
ResponseID Response
83
103
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
131 We don't want more public bus stops in the city
132 Keep these unit on the main through streets
135 The bus terminal at evergreen point station is adequate
140 Much of our roads are slow and flat. Bike lanes aren't necessary except in limited places
like the climb of westbound NE 24th. Bikes sharing the lane with cars should be
encouraged and communicated to motorists.
142 Many concerns that go along with over crowding with vehicles that are transient, loud,
fast and unsafe for all the foot traffic and children on bikes.
143 Get as much traffic as possible off the roads. The city could require public paths when
permitting multiple units. Also when light rail comes to 520, traffic could be alleviated.
147 Yes; don't degrade the driving experience for everybody because of a few scofflaws.
Enforce existing laws vigorously.
148 The larger streets in Medina that contain pass-through traffic that often is quite loud,
dangerously over the speed limit, and aggressive driving like extreme tailgating create
the largest safety risk to residents in our city. This needs to be addressed as we have any
increase in population.
150 enforce speed limit with cameras, automatic fines bike lane over Evergreen Point needs a
stop sign for cars, I've seen multiple near collisions, no enforcement
156 No.
157 No
162 Lower the taxes on those that live on the busier streets
164 They all make driving less enjoyable in the area
171 No thanks
172 We would need an Increase in police services to manage the likely increase in criminal
activity that comes with residents being disconnected from their community.
173 For many it is a long walk to public transit with no place to store a bike. It was not an
option really used by our kids when they were growing up.
175 Make the regulations strict to enable us to preserve the character of Medina
179 Yes, major concerns. Please do nothing. See my prior responses.
185 Use electric or automatous vehicles - Waymo like.
ResponseID Response
84
104
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
187 During school dismissal time, the area around STS is particularly congested. Since there
are no traffic lights, it can sometimes become a bit chaotic. Would it be possible to have
police officers assist with directing traffic during this period?
190 Enforcement works - issue tickets and people slow down. I don't think speed bumps
work as intended. I don't think we need more public transit stops in Medina -- 12th, 84th
and Evergreen Pt cover the area well.
194 The notion that bike or multi use paths will do anything to calm traffic is absurd. The bike
path across 520 has made things worse not better for traffic in our neighborhoods. The
people using our streets for biking are mostly non-residents who flout the law and
endanger drivers and walkers. Public transportation is also a disaster: dirty, dangerous
and inconvenient. My guess is the owners of most of the cars parked in the park and ride
lot are not Medina residents. It is likely that any more public transit will just benefit
others not Medina residents.
196 People always race up the steep NE 7th hill and past our house on the way thru Medina
heights. Same on NE 10th and often on Overlake drive as it slopes down towards the
school. I don't know what could be done … speed bumps maybe but it's frustrating to see
people driving so fast.
197 Increased traffic stress around St Thomas and Medina Elementary Consider using one
way roads
199 Construction traffic and large vehicles. Must limit to main arteries. Not compatible with
narrower roads
206 Road bumps may decrease the speed of cars, which makes me feel better about my
children walking or riding their bikes, but it will be a nightmare for our low cars.
207 I think the policing already does a good job of reducing speed of traffic.
208 No additional bus lines.
210 Heavy traffic in Medina has nothing to do with the citizens of Medina, it has everything to
do with people traveling through Medina. Middle Housing would add to the congestion.
Add speed bumps and round about, and strict law enforcement to make it painful for
commuting through Medina.
ResponseID Response
85
105
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
ResponseID Response
13 All of Medina
16 Better lighting on Evergreen Point Rd, Overlake Drive West …
18 If there is middle housing, 24th St should have a higher speed limit of 35 to allow more
traffic to flow. 35 is not unreasonable, particularly going downhill. Stepping on the brake
to keep to 25 just wears out the brake and releases brake dust into the air.
19 All streets should be safe. The tricky issue is our interest in maintaining a park-like
setting by not having sidewalks everywhere. An increase in traffic will absolutely
decrease safety for those of us who, by necessity, walk in the street.
20 Ne 8th street and evergreen point road
21 NE 16th Street -- buffer the sidewalk from (fast) traffic to/from the country club. Sign on
NE 18th Street to warn drivers of pedestrians.
25 Do not know
30 Traffic around the elementary schools, especially St Thomas is not well managed by the
school. They should do a better job. I don't think it's the city's responsibility to solve
40 12th, 24th and EPR main arteries. Sidewalks on smaller side streets.
17. Please provide locations for where you believe the City should focus
efforts on creating safer streets, now and in the future, with middle
housing changes.
24thpoint
12th evergreen
road
streets
84th ne
street
st
medina
traffic
schools
stop
sidewalks
8thave
city housing middle
thomas
cars
drive
main
overlake
86
106
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
41 main arteries into medina, along 84th (N and S), W bound NE 24th and the very wide
12th.
45 I don't believe the traffic will change so much that excessive measures are necessary.
Allowing street parking, adding a bus route, better sidewalks and protected bike lanes
seems sufficient.
48 I don't think middle housing will cause many issues.
49 Speed bumps around elementary schools. Please fix the red crosswalk lines at the main 5
way intersection to be more visible. Cars regularly stop/drive over the crosswalks.
Dangerous area for walkers.
50 1.84th ave and 24th street 2. 84th ave and 8th street 3. between 84th and the
roundabout that goes to 520 , near the 76th gas station
52 Focus especially near schools, school bus stops.
56 Evergreen Point Road, Northeast 24th and NE 12th St. 84th Ave NE. The lid near
Fairweather.
58 How many accidents has Medina had in the past year? Don't invent a solution to a
problem that doesn't exist!
60 N/A
61 Evergreen Point road, 16th Street, 12th and 24th Streets
65 The intersection of 24th St and 84th Ave NE is dangerous. Taking a left turn from 24th
onto 84th while coming into Medina (so moving from Clyde Hill and then turning south)
is quite hazardous because you the car across the street blocks the view of the person
attempting to turn. Possibly reorient the road or add a turn signal.
66 84th south of the Chevron has many fast drivers currently
67 NE 12th and also NE 24.
69 EPR, 24th and 12th
71 The major streets of 84th Ave Evergreen Point Road 24th Street 12th Street
73 Medina elementary school area. Cars driving fast on 8th st which is a danger to kids.
75 Speed bumps on 24th? Speed bumps/cobblestone rough patches at intersections and
blind curves, since bikers don't stop, and rarely even slow down.
84 NE 24th. Kids zooming across the road on e-bikes. More obvious crosswalks for walkers.
ResponseID Response
87
107
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
86 That five-way stop by St Thomas is awful. Even having a police officer directing traffic
during drop off and pick up could be helpful. With more people in our neighborhood this
could be an increasingly difficult intersection
87 Traffic circle by St Thomas
91 Evergreen Point Road and all roads surrounding it. The smaller streets will likely get
more traffic so accidents will be more likely.
94 I don't have sufficient insight to have meaningful input.
96 Na
97 Where the schools are located
99 Shouldn't the area be found and then address safer streets?
106 Around the schools
109 assuming the city can limit the areas where middle housing is allowed, focus on those
areas to eliminate traffic congestion and provide safety measures for cars and people.
113 Not sure
116 Evergreen Point Road, NE 24th, 84th south of NE 12th.
118 NO 'middle housing' to Medina! Keep single-family communities! Save tradition and
America's culture! WA has plenty of lands available for housing. Use those!
119 none
120 Lighting and sidewalks on Evergreen Point Road north of the 520 Lid.
122 5 way stop in from on St Thomas can be very dangerous.
123 All places where middle housing is allowed.
124 Don't know
125 excess traffic on overlake dr
126 Evergreen Point Road north of 24th needs attention.
127 along the major arterials: 24th, 20th, 12th, 8th, Evergreen point
128 Both streets aligning the dog park that get very backed up.
ResponseID Response
88
108
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
132 Main through streets
135 Not sure
136 The intersection of 84th and12th is pretty crazy when schools (St Thomas and Medina
Elem) are going in and out of session. Surely we can come up with a better solution than
a 5 way stop? Seems like a safety issue with small children and so many cars vying to
get in and out ... and no police or guards to supervise.
138 Overlake Dr E is RIDICULOUS for not having sidewalk for the MANY walkers.
DANGEROUS, always has been. Need a sidewalk badly!
140 The road most needing a sidewalk is Overlake Drive East. From Ridge Rd to Lake
Washington Blvd would greatly increase safety for all and encourage walking from
Medina to Bellevue. Starting at Upland Rd would reach even more residents. Sidewalks
on our bigger streets like EPR, NE 24th, 12th, 10th, 8th. Many already have sidewalks
but only one side, or they stop at some point.
142 Do not create the problems in the first place
143 All the options you mentioned. Why would I have an opinion? Other than, let's all walk
to the transit and get rid of our cars. How about golf carts?
144 the main roads people take when commutting - NE 12th, 24th, etc.
146 The City should put more efforts on areas close to park and school.
147 Throughout the city. Data from the police department should point the way and help
prioritize the work.
148 84th street between 520 and NE 12th, and NE 12th from 84th to NE 1st (Lake
Washington Blvd)
149 None, the neighborhood does not have an issue with speeding and there are wide streets
to allow for bikes
150 Evergreen Point, 24th, 12th, major aertials
156 I love roundabouts. I would put one on 78th, 79th, and 80 and more as they get to the
cross streets. Same in the middle of the roads south of 10th.
157 Streets are completely fine
159 More street lamps on 84th between 12th & Overlake Drive
162 NE. 12th St., Lake, WA Boulevard 84th Ave., Northeast
164 None. Add more cameras to catch the bad behavior.
ResponseID Response
89
109
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
165 By Medina Elementary, on Evergreen Point Road from 8th to 24th
171 I do not know yet
172 Police presence and patrols
173 We should have neighborhood streets and through streets. Don't turn every
neighborhood into a through street. Discus on keeping quiet streets quiet and keep the
through streets through.
174 It's going to depend on how things shake out. It is so hard to visualize how this will play
out.
176 4 way stop by Chevron and St Thomas during school drop off and pick-up. Evergreen
point road. 24th Street. Basically all the entrances to the city which people use to get to
the park and ride and to drop their kids off at school.
178 Evergreen point road could be narrowed and paths on both side of the road added. Wort
about traffics to Bellevue Christian backing up during pickup and neighborhood people
being stuck with no way around it.
179 Add auto camera ticketing for speeders on Evergreen Point Road, 24th, 12th, and 84th.
All see excessive speeders all day, every day (week days mostly). Medina should not be
paying for that crazy on street, indented, parking that just got finished on 12th between
St Thomas and EPR. I don't want my taxes wasted on any more on street parking.
Developers need to bear ALL parking responsibilities. ALL.
180 Around schools and parks Sidewalks along all of Overlake Drive
185 Not sure
186 84th Ave NE
192 It depends where high density will be built
193 I don't think the City should add middle housing units
194 If it applies city wide then the safety initiatives must also be applied city wide.
196 The streets I mentioned before and 82nd past the park.
197 Schools ingress egress
199 Main arteries. Wider sidewalks on narrow streets.
203 Lights on streets
ResponseID Response
90
110
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
205 Evergreen Point Road is already abused as a "suburban arterial". Speed has never been
regulated well.
206 Evergreen Point Rd
207 Political change. Residents should stop funding idiots in state government that sponsor
this type of thing.
208 Around schools
210 12th & 84th, 24th & 84th.
ResponseID Response
91
111
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
18. The City of Medina is not required to build middle housing. Instead, the
City is required to allow for residents who wish to develop middle
housing. Would you or your family consider building an ADU, Duplex or
other middle housing type on your lot?
62% No
22% Maybe
16% Yes
Value Percent Responses
No
Maybe
Yes
Totals: 148
62.2%92
22.3%33
15.5%23
Statistics
Total Responses 148
92
112
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
93
113
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
19. If Yes, which of the following would you be most interested in
developing?
74% ADU
17% Cottage Housing: Two
detached units with shared open
space
4% Duplex
4% Stacked Flats: Two units in a
building where each floor is a
separate unit
Value Percent Responses
ADU
Cottage Housing: Two detached units with shared open
space
Duplex
Stacked Flats: Two units in a building where each floor
is a separate unit
Courtyard Apartment: Two attached units with a
courtyard between them
Totals: 23
73.9%17
17.4%4
4.3%1
4.3%1
0.0%0
94
114
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Statistics
Hidden 175
Total Responses 23
95
115
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
20. If Maybe, which of the following are you most interested in?
67% ADU
27% Cottage Housing: Two
detached units with shared open
space
6% Duplex
Value Percent Responses
ADU
Cottage Housing: Two detached units with shared open
space
Duplex
Courtyard Apartment: Two attached units with a
courtyard between them
Stacked Flats: Two units in a building where each floor
is a separate unit
Totals: 33
66.7%22
27.3%9
6.1%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
96
116
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Statistics
Hidden 165
Total Responses 33
97
117
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
ResponseID Response
13 For all of the reasons listed in my previous responses.
16 I don't want to reduce my green space.
17 I'm too old to deal with that!
18 Maybe a duplex to house elderly parents but nothing more (not a triplex or 6-plex)
26 We have no need for an ADU or additional housing.
27 Keep Medina...Medina.
32 I want to preserve the current neighborhood feel.
40 Lot is only 8119. No room for an ADU.
48 Our house is too big for us already now that the kids are grown and gone. The last thing
we need is more space!
49 Would diminish property values for us as well as neighbors and community
51 We don't want one
52 Basically don't want someone else living on my property. A bit harsh - but the fact.
56 We don't have a lot big enough for it and don't have a need to do so at this time.
21. If no, state your reason why not.
lotmedinaadu
househousingneighborhood
communitybig
interestedorpropertyspace
density
family people privacy
type
add
additional
cityfeelhard
landlordlargelong
98
118
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
59 Not interested in being a landlord. Not interested in selling art of my property.
66 I dont want the density which is why we're here.
67 I have a small lot and I wouldn't do that to my neighbors.
69 Already have an ADU but would not consider renting it.
70 not needed
71 No need
73 Don't have space on our lot
75 Tree preservation.
76 we like our house as is
78 we have an ADU already.
82 No need for it
84 Not needed
85 We rent, don't own. If I did own, I don't want strangers living on my property.
87 It would change the quiet nature of Medina with more people being added.
88 I worked hard to be able to afford to move the heck out of Seattle. Why would I import
their problems here?
90 Lot not large enough
91 our lot is too small to accommodate and we are are already at our lot size to building
limit
92 Not interested in sharing our lot. It is not large enough with our current home. And our
house is only 2900 sq ft
96 This is the worst idea one can have You will drive people out of this community and
create a monster
97 I don't agree with the MH requirement
99 Why ruin a beautiful city that's already been impacted greatly by renters (VRBO, long
term)
ResponseID Response
99
119
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
101 No should be sufficient!
103 It would be hard without taking down old trees
105 Begins the process of degrading the community. ADUs are a mistake.
107 No room!
109 our lot is for a SFR--------we have absolutely no desire to share it with anyone else
110 We have no room for one.
111 Our building envelop doesn't allow for it
113 We already have one.
117 Would ruin what we all love about Medina.
118 NO 'middle housing' to Medina! Keep single-family communities! Save tradition and
America's culture!
120 We just got through a remodel recently and are not interested in starting over. If the rules
had changed before our remodel we might have considered an ADU (but probably not
given our family situation). Allowing additional housing to be built but without adjusting
required setbacks and lot coverage will likely not result in any real increase.
121 No plan
122 My lot is not large enough to add another type of housing on.
123 Our lot is about 8000 square feet and middle housing or an ADU would not "fit" on our
lot with an existing single family house on it
124 Do not want in community
127 our lot is already fully developed from a % of impervious surface coverage, and we have
limited parking onsite.
128 We worked hard to buy in this neighborhood because of the big lots, beautiful houses,
and safe quiet neighborhood. I do not plan on taking this away by making some extra
money renting out a ADU.
129 Our Setback do not allow for anything
130 I don't want my guests getting that comfortable and staying too long
131 Because we want to maintain the character of our neighborhood
ResponseID Response
100
120
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
132 Do not want it! Nor do I want it around me.
133 It runs against the type of neighborhood/community we sought when purchasing our
house.
135 Safety. Loss of privacy. Loss of gardens. Pollution. Resentment of requirement
136 I am not interested in development. But, I live on .75 acres and could imagine a developer
looking to "buy one and build two (or more)" homes in the future. That strategy may be
especially appealing to foreign buyers looking to maximize their investment and tenant
capacity. However, I doubt the new residences would be "affordable."
138 Not in character of neighborhood and not why I moved to Medina
139 I do not like the idea
140 We don't have a use for an ADU that makes the construction disruption worth it.
142 I do not want it.
147 It would have to come at the expense of the wonderful vegetation that contributes to
making Medina the wonderful place that it is.
149 No need.
155 Our lot is not big enough for starters.
156 Our property size and type would not accept an ADU without disrupting the view and
flow of the yard.
158 Privacy
159 Not interested
162 If I wanted to live in the city, I'd move to Seattle
164 I don't want to add more people to my lot.
165 Because I like my house the way it is.
166 It will add density but not make homes more affordable. Nobody wins.
168 Because it will change the feel of our neighborhood and have long term impacts
169 Busy enough
ResponseID Response
101
121
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
172 We don't want to manage renters or deal with the problems of being a landlord in
Medina.
174 I like the way my house is and I think it would devalue it.
175 The aesthetics will not look good
183 Keep the low density life style
184 We simply wants big yard for kids and pets
187 I've explained it on the first question.
188 Don't feel it's compatible with the Medina community
190 We purchased here for our yard/outdoor space and trees.
191 Preserve land for use
192 In like Medina the way it is
193 Lack of privacy. Additional noise, cars, people.
194 I don't want to be a landlord and I'm not a real estate speculator.
196 Don't have plans to at this time
199 Have ADU already.
203 its ridiculous and we have no space. Most lots cannot support that type of housing
205 This type of density is not why we moved to Medina.
206 We enjoy the privacy and safety of Medina.
210 We enjoy our single family home and our neighborhood as it is. A middle housing
structure on our lot is not feasible for a quality standard of life. If I wanted this I would
move to a more dense city.
ResponseID Response
102
122
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
22. Which of the following methods would you most likely engage with to
provide feedback? Please select all that apply.
Percent
Online
surveys
Town
halls/public
forums
Focus-
group
discussion
Commenting
at public
meetings
Other,
please
specify:
0
20
40
60
80
100
Value Percent Responses
Online surveys
Town halls/public forums
Focus-group discussion
Commenting at public meetings
Other, please specify:
89.6%129
55.6%80
37.5%54
28.5%41
5.6%8
103
123
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Statistics
Skipped 3
Total Responses 144
Other, please specify:Count
Anyway to increase communication is good. I think 1
Attend City Council and Planning Commission Meetings 1
Email 1
I will not be offering other responses. Said enough 1
I'm not a fan of groups. I like quiet. But I'm happy to discuss things if asked.1
In-person feedback venues only. Virtual meetings are a cop-out.1
Instagram groups 1
virtual town halls 1
Totals 8
104
124
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
23. How would you want to receive information and updates about
changes in the City like housing policies?
Percent
Email City's
website
Mailers Social
media
Phone Other,
please
specify:
0
20
40
60
80
100
Value Percent Responses
Email
City's website
Mailers
Social media
Phone
Other, please specify:
90.2%129
39.9%57
37.8%54
21.7%31
7.0%10
0.7%1
105
125
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Statistics
Skipped 4
Total Responses 143
Other, please specify:Count
Text 1
Totals 1
106
126
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
ResponseID Response
16 Please add more street lighting. It is too dark in Medina. It's a public safety issue. Would
like more info on how design guidelines might work. What are the affordable housing
targets that were presented in this survey? That wasn't covered in the presentation.
17 I do have a concern - there should be strict oversight of contractors builders, who might
want to come in and buy up an empty lot, put up a less than perfect two unit home on a
lot and make a quick buck.
19 I'm deeply concerned about how this legislation will negatively affect our quiet, safe city
and ask that the city council do all it can to minimize the adverse outcomes.
21 Backyard lighting by neighbors throughout the night is adversely affecting the
neighborhood character, as well as sleeping patterns. Too bright and on all night. Please
do something to address this issue.
23 it is tragic our local leaders and representative did not find a way to get an exemption.
this will lead to subdivided lots etc - the elected officials clearly want to increase density
at every city - it remains to be seen how the market reacts, but the other concern is
whether to get to affordable housing there will be financial incentives (HUD8 for
example) require - if and when this happens, my advice is to just merge with Bellevue,
because local officials at Medina are becoming figureheads to the overlords in Olympia -
and we know more is coming....
24. Are there any other matters you’d like the City to know at this time?
Please comment below if so.
medinacity
housing
affordablecode
middle
adu
builders
community
orparking people public beautiful
build
building
character
cities
communities
concern
concerned
current
family
house
laws
107
127
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
26 While you're reviewing middle housing and changing the code, will you please look at
changing the start times/end times for construction. I live on Evergreen point and often
hear trucks/back-hoes/back up warning sounds starting as early as 7am. There has been
constant construction on Evergreen point for years (the house behind me is going on its
third year of building). I would appreciate the construction code changing to at least be in
line with the leaf blowers and yard maintenance rules. Also, I would appreciate it very
much if the city would consider a ban on planting trees as a hedge (especially near
property lines). Some of the trees developers plant for privacy can grow several feet
each year. If they are not maintained, they become a nightmare for the resident on the
other side of the fence. These trees block sunlight and cost thousands of dollars per year
in trimming, just to keep their branches from extending onto the neighboring property.
30 Prioritize protecting our trees! Tree code needs to be updated. We are still losing too
much tree canopy. And this is likely to make it worse!
45 It looks like architects are increasingly applying for variances to City Building Codes. This
affects residents when the City doesn't enforce its Codes uniformly on lot coverage,
building height etc. I'd like to see a return to previous days when variances were the
exception and residents could trust that new building would be built to Code
50 The ultimate goal is to keep medina a quiet, clean, and safe neighourhood with minimal
changes (in terms of housing). We already experienced huge changes that a small
rambler turns into a giant monster house which is sometime ugly and not conducive to
the whole community look.
51 This policy is being imposed upon our city by the state government without adequate
warning or input from its citizens. The city of Medina should hold a plebiscite vote and if
the majority are in opposition, should join like-minded communities (Clyde Hill for one) to
take legal action against the state mandate, rather than just passively accept this
imposition. Again, this kind of heavy handed mandate has NEVER created useful
affordable housing, instead in most cases people end up paying more for less and
options decrease.
53 local leaders did not demonstrate any proactive attempts to squash this from being
mandated here - it is my understanding the yarrow point mayor did some lobbying, but
where was medina?
60 Rent cost reduction and for there to be a cap on rent increases. The rent goes up every
year, on a fixed income people are going homeless. Our social security went up 35.00
last year and this community increased the rent 40.00 . , and everyone is not paying the
same for the same units?
75 Builders have not been policed, andtherby required to obey current tree codes, or use
LONG TERM tree protection. They often "cheat" here and there on our construction code,
and very large, beautiful old trees die a few years later.
94 I'd love it if Medina and the MEERT worked with Bellevue to set up a network of LoRa
repeaters.
ResponseID Response
108
128
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
96 None
97 No
103 The rural feel makes Medina an oasis we should keep as much greenery and trees as we
possibly can. Clear Cut Point Rd doesnt have the same feel to it.
106 I just got a permit for an ADU, and the City made it more expensive and difficult because
of its cumbersome - and sometimes ridiculous - permitting process. My architects have
been tied into knots by the City, being told one thing one day, and another the next. This
will have to change, or nobody is going to build anything.
107 My neighborhood has CC&R's - does the state honor them?
109 please try to save Medina--------these news laws will make our special city much less
desirable and livable
112 People are blocking the lawful use of street parking. You are not addressing this issue.
113 Thank you so much for sending this survey and allowing comments. I appreciate it.
116 The character of Medina should be in the hands of the residents and not determined by
central planners in Olympia. Density enhancements always benefit developers and
speculators. Affordability is a beautiful dream but would have to be subsidized to create
alignment with current AMI metrics. Let's keep as much of our "rural and silvan" character
as we can as we develop new land use code and development standards. Let's reduce
bulk and stimulate through incentives better architecture, lower site coverages (to
mitigate higher densities), and manage parking, traffic, lighting, noise, and other potential
impacts.
118 NO 'middle housing' to Medina! Keep single-family communities! Save tradition and
America's culture!
119 parking
126 We were required to remove a separate guest house unit on our property when we built
our house in 1999/2000. We were unable to retain it due to lot coverage/impermeable
surfaces, and because of the restrictions about improving it (adding insulation or
updating any of the structure) was limited to 10% of the value of the structure. We
always wished we could have kept it for use as a 'mother-in-laws' cottage or for housing
for a college student or help at our home. Even though the City bylaws seem to be
changing, the likelihood of our being able to replicate that ADU seems unlikely as it was
located close to the lake and now that it is gone, it seems unlikely we would we be
permitted to put it back in its original location.
128 I do not want current housing laws...height of houses, set-backs, etc. to be altered for
builders to come in and put up more buildings and make more profit than they already
are.
ResponseID Response
109
129
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
132 No
133 Please fight this. There are plenty of cities, town and communities that would not be
affected by denser housing; Medina is not one of them!
135 We should preserve what we now have and reject adherence to middle housing. I would
support funding to hire attorneys to defend rejecting middle housing requirements.
138 I hope the city will not make it easy for this to happen. Permitting can always be a hassle
w/ any city, I hope Medina will do what is within the confines of the law to not make it an
attractive option
142 If builders start pushing to get smaller set backs, build higher build "cottage homes" our
community will be changed for the worse. For the record, this was a VERY hard survey to
understand and answer.
143 I am concerned that we are not ready for the impacts of middle housing and that we don't
have the funding to get ready. We are not allowed to restrict development with
requirements to reduce the impacts on the community. Mandates without state funding
will create problems for cities.
144 Please do more about aggressive drivers from locals - it's not cut through traffic that tail
gate daily, it's local cars pulling into local driveways. Also can we please get a helmet
law for kids/youth? As someone who works in healthcare - TBIs are such a great risk that
will impact them for the rest of their lives.
148 Enabling or at least maintaining the ability to convert an existing utility building to an
ADU will be helpful in maintaining the character of the city.
150 Property values and public safety are paramount
156 No.
157 No
162 Make your meetings and public hearings more accessible to people by providing Zoom
connections
164 Just say no.
171 Thank you for your guys support and I really appreciate it for you guys that bless you
173 We have an ADU. It came with our home and we just rebuilt it. It is lovely and has been a
good thing for our family. ADU's can be done well.
175 City residents need to lobby to exclude Medina from this program.
178 Wet concerned about short term rentals like Airbnbs.
ResponseID Response
110
130
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
183 Medina utility, roads, public facilities are not deisgned for multi family. We should keep
the life style of Medina. The affordability problem is for big cities, not us. It doesn't make
sense at all to ask Medina to make house affordable, it's open market, people value the
location, the life style here
184 My main concern is safty
190 Please remove the posts blocking the parking spots at Viewpoint Park. It is a beautiful
spot to pull in and watch winter (cold) sunsets and I really miss being able to do that in
my neighborhood. I do not understand why they are there. :-(
203 If the city of Medina is not required to build units then leave it. What can the state do?
210 I strongly oppose this legislation, and equitable middle housing mandates isn't the
solution to the affordable housing challenge.
ResponseID Response
111
131
AGENDA ITEM 6.2
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF MEDINA
501 EVERGREEN POINT ROAD | PO BOX 144 | MEDINA WA 98039-0144
TELEPHONE 425-233-6400 | www.medina-wa.gov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 25, 2025
TO: Medina Planning Commission
FROM: SCJ Alliance, Middle Housing Consultant and Jonathan G. Kesler,
AICP, Planning Manager
RE: Review of Remaining Tasks for Middle Housing
Summary:
The work on the middle housing project continues to progress on schedule. This memo
will provide a brief update on the present status of the middle housing project, as well
as next steps.
As discussed in previous meetings, as a Tier 3 City, Medina is required to adopt an
ordinance amending the development regulations to allow for middle housing within the
residential zones in the City. The deadline to complete the work is June 30, 2025.
At this meeting, the Planning Commission is reviewing the proposed Middle Housing
and Unit Lot Subdivision Ordinances that were sent to Commerce today. This follows a
review of them by the City Council on March 24, 2025.
Next Steps
Since the Planning Commission last met, Council was provided with a status update on
the middle housing project (March 10th), including a potential timeline that would allow
the work to be completed prior to the June 30 th compliance deadline. Based on
feedback during that meeting, the timeline was revised and was incorporated into an
Agenda Bill for review and consideration on March 24th. The same one is outlined
below, as of March 20, 2025 (subject to final revisions by Council on the 24 th).
The previously mentioned revisions to the adoption timeline are as follows:
1. March 25, 2025 – Initiate SEPA DNS
Publish SEPA DNS with a 30-day comment period
Send proposed Middle Housing and Unit Lot Subdivision Ordinances to
Commerce
2. March 25, 2025 - Planning Commission
Review ordinances sent to Commerce
132
AGENDA ITEM 6.3
Page 2 of 2
3. April 22, 2025 - Planning Commission Public Hearing
Middle Housing Ordinance
Unit Lot Subdivision Ordinance
4. April 28, 2025 - City Council
Review outcome of Planning Commission hearing
5. May 12, 2025 - City Council Public Hearing
Middle Housing ordinance
Unit Lot Subdivision ordinance
6. May 27, 2025 – City Council
Final Action on the Middle Housing and Unit Lot Subdivision Ordinances
7. Submit ordinances to Department of Commerce
Prior to June 30, 2025 deadline
As previously noted, Council has identified other topics for review that are related to
middle housing, which are not required for inclusion in the Middle Housing Ordinance.
Staff recommends that those additional topics be considered as “Phase 2” with code
work scheduled for potential adoption later in the year. The selected topics will be
considered in future work sessions and Council meetings with direction given to the
Planning Commission. In addition, other work will need to be done, including the
mandatory work on the Critical Area Ordinance Update that will begin later this Spring.
133
AGENDA ITEM 6.3
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF MEDINA
501 EVERGREEN POINT ROAD | PO BOX 144 | MEDINA WA 98039-0144
TELEPHONE 425-233-6400 | www.medina-wa.gov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 25, 2025
TO: Medina Planning Commission
FROM: Jennifer S. Robertson, City Attorney and Jonathan G. Kesler, AICP,
Planning Manager
RE: Review of Middle Housing and Subdivision Ordinance Drafts
Summary:
The City Council previously reviewed the Proposed Unit Lot Subdivision/Zero Lot
Line Ordinance at the Council Study Session on February 24, 2025. During that
meeting, Council gave direction for revisions. Those revisions have been made to the
document, which is attached. In the Council study session, Council will have a second
opportunity to discuss this revised Ordinance. In addition, during the regular Council
meeting that begins immediately after this study session, Council members had a final
review of the proposed Ordinance before it is submitted to the Department of
Commerce on March 25, 2025, for the mandatory 60-day review.
The regular session included time for review of the Middle Housing Ordinance which is
also being transmitted to Commerce on March 25, 2025. The Planning Commission
(PC) will also review the Ordinance Drafts, that Council saw on March 24th, this
evening. Note: Any changes made by Council will be noted at the PC meeting
tonight.
The outline of the Proposed Unit Lot Subdivision/Zero Lot Line Ordinance is as
follows:
1. State Mandated Compliance for Updating Subdivision Requirements.
As part of adopting the middle housing requirements, the State legislature included a
requirement in ESSHB 1110 requiring cities to allow “zero lot line” short subdivisions.
RCW 36.70A.635(5), provides in pertinent part: “A city must also allow zero lot line short
subdivision where the number of lots created is equal to the unit density required in
subsection (1) of this section.” This means that the City of Medina must allow zero lot
line subdivisions that result in two lots for existing lots where residential uses are
allowed. In addition, since Medina is counting ADUs towards the middle housing
density, a lot division could also occur for the allowed ADUs. This will be effectuated via
a short unit lot subdivision that is limited to the maximum density in the middle housing
ordinance.
134
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
Page 2 of 4
2. Overview of Proposed Changes to Subdivision Code.
Below, this memo walks through the changes to the Medina subdivision code, including
revisions since the last Council meeting on this topic. The draft ordina nce is attached
as Exhibit 1. Changes to the code are shown by the use of either strike out or underline
text. If a section is brand new, that is also noted. Where sections of the subdivision code
are not being changed, those sections are not included.
A. Definitions – Chapter 16.12 MMC.
The definition of “Lot” at MMC 16.12.130 is updated for consistency with the new short
unit lot subdivision provisions. The definition of Parent Lot, Unit Lot and Lot Split are
added to MMC 16.12.130 as those terms are use d in the updated code. Lot split was
added as that is a term that was use during in the middle housing legislation (RCW
36.70A.635(6); RCW 36.70A.681(2)) and there is a bill pending in the Legislature this
session regarding “Lot Splits”. In MMC 16.12.200, the definitions for “Short Subdivision”
is updated to address until lot subdivisions. New definitions for “Unit Lot Short
Subdivision” and “Zero Lot Line Subdivision” were also added. The definitions
applicable to long subdivisions were deleted since the l ast draft.
B. Subdivisions – Chapter 16.73.
MMC 16.73.020 “Applicability” was updated to include short unit lot subdivisions. The
reference to unit lot subdivisions (long, not short) was removed from this draft.
MMC 16.73.060 “Survey Requirements” was updated to include short unit lot
subdivisions. The reference to unit lot subdivisions was removed in this draft.
MMC 16.73.080 “Review procedures and approvals” was updated to include short
unit lot subdivisions. . The reference to unit lot subdivisions wa s removed in this draft.
MMC 16.73.090 “Approval criteria” was updated to include short unit lot subdivisions
(but no longer includes unit lot subdivisions). In addition, a new subsection “C” was
added to specifically address short unit lot subdivisions. These set forth how they apply
and restrictions for use of the short unit lot subdivision procedures. This subsection
includes several protections to ensure that only the maximum density set forth is the
zoning code, including the new provisions under mid dle housing, are used and that re-
division of a lot is not allowed. This subsection also clarifies that the maximum lot
coverage for the original lot is still applicable across the new lots as are the existing
setbacks which must be followed for the external lot area(s)/parent lot.
A new code section, MMC 16.73.095 “Lot segregations – Zero-lot-line
development” is proposed for when the unit lot subdivision is also a zero -lot line
subdivision.
MMC 16.73.100 “Submittal requirements” is amended to include short unit lot
subdivisions (but no longer includes unit lot subdivisions). This also requires the
applicant to show all lot lines, including internal lines, common use areas, setbacks,
building footprints, etc.
135
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
Page 3 of 4
MMC 16.73.110 “Approval criteria —Final short subdivision and subdivision” is
amended to include short unit lot subdivisions (and no longer includes unit lot
subdivisions).
MMC 16.73.120 “Submittal requirements—Final short subdivision and
subdivision” is amended to include short unit lot subdivisions (it no longer includes
unit lot subdivisions). A new subsection “G” was added to specifically address short unit
lot subdivisions.
MMC 16.73.140 “Recording with county auditor” is amended to include short unit lot
subdivisions (but no longer includes unit lot subdivisions).
MMC 16.73.150 “Expiration of final approval” is amended to include short unit lot
subdivisions (but no longer includes unit lot subdivisions).
The outline of the Proposed Middle Housing Ordinance is as follows:
The City of Medina contracted with SCJ Alliance in September of 2024, after which they
met with the City Council for the first time on October 14, 2024. Subsequent meetings
with City Council included presentations on the State requirements, and the status of
the mandated updates to the Uniform Development Code.
During the January 27, 2025 meeting, City Council reviewed a draft ordinance that was
sent to the Department in advance of a January 31, 2025 deliverable deadline.
Development of the ordinance took place in various stages. In addition to meetings
with City Council, the Planning Commission and Development Services Committee also
reviewed the State requirements and materials produced by SCJ to provide
recommendations on the code amendments. To aid in this process, SCJ developed a
gap analysis matrix to identify the sections of Medina’s needed to be updated, and an
accompanying code amendment document with all revisions shown in Track Changes.
To aid jurisdictions in achieving compliance with the new state ma ndates, the
Department of Commerce has produced guidance materials to help interpret the new
state laws. These materials were reviewed to aid in the development of the code
amendments, along with unique materials and graphics prepared by SCJ Alliance that
were specific to Medina.
Included within the materials drafted by Commerce was a DRAFT middle housing
ordinance that jurisdictions could choose to adopt. Jurisdictions were given the
opportunity to review the ordinance and make local policy decisions abo ut certain items
within the model ordinance. However, if jurisdictions DO NOT adopt an ordinance by
their specified deadline, then the model ordinance goes into effect as written by the
State.
Medina’s effort to be more deliberate about what to include in the ordinance was
important, as the model ordinance goes above and beyond what is required by State
legislation. In comparison, the state model ordinance is much more restrictive than
Medina’s current draft ordinance.
136
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
Page 4 of 4
The City of Medina has exerted great effort into understanding which portions of the
housing legislation were required for the City. The objective of SCJ Alliance has been
to help Medina achieve compliance, while considering local policy choice where
allowed.
The following is a summary of the amendments to the draft ordinance that was
submitted to the Department of Commerce (see Exhibit 2):
New definitions and updates to definitions as required by State law.
Modifications to land use designations and zoning district labels to remo ve the
term single-family
The use table was updated to include the mandate middle housing types,
specifically:
o Duplex
o Cottage housing
o Stacked flats
o Courtyard apartments
Maximum accessory dwelling units (ADUs/DADUs) on a lot was increased to
two units per lot. This complies with the State requirements found in RCW
36.70A.635(5)
Off-street parking requirements were amended to describe that only one parking
space can be required for units less than 6,000 square feet, and no more than
two can be required for units greater than 6,000 square feet.
ADU regulations were updated to comply with HB 1337 requirements.
As described previously, the work session is an opportunity to review the draft
ordinance and have time for a question and answer perio d with city staff and the
consultants.
Exhibits:
Exhibit 1: Unit Lot Subdiv. Ordinance, revised
Exhibit 2: Proposed Middle Housing Ordinance, revised
137
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
1
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON
Ordinance No. xxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MEDINA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE MEDINA UNIFIED
DEVELOPMENT CODE TO PROVIDE FOR ZERO LOT LINE
SUBDIVISIONS CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
RCW 36.70A.635(5), AMENDING SECTIONS 16.12.130,
16.12.200, 16.73.020, 16.73.060, 16.73.080, 16.73.090, 16.73.100,
16.73.110, 16.73.120, 16.73.140 AND 16.73.150 OF THE MEDINA
MUNICIPAL CODE (MMC) AND CREATING A NEW SECTION
16.73.095 OF THE MMC, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND
CORRECTIONS; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the State Legislature adopted legislation regarding middle housing (ESSHB
1110) and imposed requirements on cities to bring their land use codes into compliance with that
legislation; and
WHEREAS, Medina is classified as a “Tier 3 city” under the middle housing legislation and
is required to have a compliant code by June 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City is also in the process of updating its zoning code to provide for middle
housing and that work requires amending Section 16.12.200 “S” definitions which are amended
by this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, in order to avoid two separate ordinances contemporaneously amending the
same section of code, the middle housing amendments to the “S” definitions are included in this
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the State legislature included a requirement in ESSHB 1110 for cities to allow
“zero lot line” short subdivisions (RCW 36.70A.635(5)) where the number of lots created is equal
to the unit density required under the middle housing legislation; and
WHEREAS, under the middle housing legislation, Medina is required to allow two dwelling
units on any lot that is zoned for residential development; and
WHEREAS, this means that the City of Medina must allow zero lot line subdivisions that
result in the number of lots equal to the unit density under middle housing for lots for existing lots
where residential uses are allowed; and
WHEREAS, in order to ensure consistency between state law and the Medina Municipal
Code (MMC), certain updates are required; and
WHEREAS, unit lot short subdivisions are a type of subdivision that allows for smaller unit
lots for increased housing density; and
138
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
2
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
WHEREAS, in order to allow the zero lot line subdivisions, it is in the public interest to
create a short unit lot subdivision process that can be used to divide a single residential lot into
the number lots equal to the middle housing unit density for the purposes of middle housing
development and to create special standards when such subdivision is also a zero lot line
development; and
WHEREAS, the Medina Planning Commission held three (3) study sessions on this
Ordinance and the Medina City Council held eight (8) meetings where this Ordinance was
discussed; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance was submitted to the Department of Commerce for 60-day
review on March 25, 2025; and
WHEREAS, on March 25, 2025, the City’s SEPA official issued a determination of
nonsignificance for the proposed amendments, which was published and provided to the public
in accordance with WAC 197-11-510, and there have been no appeals; and
WHEREAS, the City issued a Notice of Public Hearing for the proposed code amendment
at least 15 days prior to the public hearing before the City’s Planning Commission which was
published in the City’s official newspaper and provided to the public in accordance with Title 16
MMC; and
WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to recommend
approval of this Ordinance to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed this Ordinance along with the recommendation
from the Planning Commission during its regular meeting on April 28, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on this Ordinance on May 12, 2025 to
take additional comment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that it is in the public interest, safety and
welfare to update its code as required by State law; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 16.12.130 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.12.130. “L” definitions.
Land alteration means any movement or modification of more than 25 cubic
yards of earth material on any site.
Landscape means plant materials, topography, and other natural physical
elements combined in relation to one another and to manmade structures.
Landscaping means the planting, removal and maintenance of vegetation along
with the movement and displacement of earth, topsoil, rock, bark and similar
substances done in conjunction with the planting, removal and maintenance of
vegetation.
139
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
3
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
Landslide hazard areas means areas that are potentially subject to risk of mass
movement due to a combination of geologic, topographic, and hydrologic factors.
These areas are typically susceptible to landslides because of a combination of
factors including bedrock, soil, slope (gradient), slope aspect, geologic structure,
ground water, hydrology, or other factors.
Lane, private means a developed private right-of-way which provides vehicle
access to more than one lot abutting thereon. (See Chapter 16.91 MMC.)
Lattice tower means a support structure characterized by an open framework of
lateral cross members which stabilize the structure.
Lot means (1) a fractional part of subdivided lands having fixed boundaries being
of sufficient area and dimension to meet the minimum and maximum underlying
zoning district requirements for width, area and street frontage, except for unit lots
approved in accordance with MMC 16.73.090.C or MMC 16.73.095; (2) land having
fixed boundaries used as a "building site." The term includes parcels and tracts.
Lot area means the dry land area of a lot, which is further defined as land area
exclusive of shorelands, except those which by recession of water or bulkhead have
become dry land above the high water level.
Lot area, gross means all areas within the boundaries of a lot.
Lot area, net means the lot area exclusive of the area of any vehicular private
lane, vehicular right-of-way, vehicular access easement, or any areas unbuildable
due to the presence of critical areas as defined in Chapter 16.50 MMC.
Lot, corner means a lot situated at the intersection of, and abutting upon, the
intersection of two or more streets, or the intersection of a street and a private lane,
or upon two parts of the same street, provided the interior angle of intersection is not
more than 135 degrees. In the case of a curved corner, the tangents at the street
extremities of the side lot lines shall be used for forming the angle.
Lot line adjustment means a minor movement of a property line between two or
more adjoining parcels. Lot line adjustments are used to correct minor trespasses
(such as building a shed over a property line) or to add acreage to a parcel for the
owner's convenience.
Lot, parent means a lot which is subdivided into unit lots through the unit lot
subdivision process.
Lot split means a legal lot which is divided into the number of new lots equal to
the unit density under middle housing. At least one of th new lots may be smaller than
the required minimum lot size. Lots which are split by a “lot split” may not be split nor
subdivided a second time.
Lot, through means a lot bounded on two opposite sides by streets; provided,
however, that if any lot qualifies as being both a corner lot and a through lot, such lot
shall be deemed to be a corner lot for the purposes of the zoning code.
Lot, unit means a lot created from a parent lot and approved through the unit lot
subdivision process.
Low impact development best management practice means any one of several
distributed stormwater management practices, integrated into a site, that emphasize
pre-disturbance hydrologic processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation
and transpiration. LID BMPs include, but are not limited to: bioretention, rain gardens,
permeable pavements, dispersion, and water reuse. Further information can be found
in the stormwater manual adopted under MMC 13.06.020.
140
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
4
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
Section 2. Section 16.12.200 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.12.200. “S” definitions:
School means a school operation with 13 or more attendees at any one time,
not including immediate family members who reside in the school or employees.
School operation means any institution of learning, excluding those offering
post-secondary education, offering instruction in the several branches of learning
and study required by the Basic Education Code of the State of Washington to be
taught in the public, private and parochial school.
Scrub-shrub wetland means a regulated wetland with at least 30 percent of
its surface area covered by woody vegetation less than 20 feet in height as the
uppermost strata as measured from existing grade.
Security barrier means an obstruction, such as fences, walls, vegetation and
similar elements that restricts public access.
Seismic hazard areas means areas that are subject to severe risk of damage
as a result of earthquake-induced ground shaking, slope failure, settlement, soil
liquefaction, lateral spreading, or surface faulting.
Sensitive areas. See "critical areas."
SEPA. See definition of "State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)."
Service area means the vicinity around a wireless communication facility that
effectively receives signals from and transmits signals to the facility.
Setback means the minimum distance from the property line to where a
structure may be built. (See MMC 16.22.030.)
Setback area means the area of a lot or building site between the property
line and the limits set by this Code within which no structure may intrude unless
allowed otherwise by law.
Shorelands or shoreland areas means those lands extending landward for
200 feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high
water mark or floodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward 200 feet from
such floodways; and all wetlands and river deltas associated with the streams,
lakes and tidal waters which are subject to the provisions of the Washington State
Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and the City of Medina shoreline master
program, Chapters 16.60 through 16.67 MMC.
Shorelines means all of the water areas of the state as defined in RCW
90.58.030, including reservoirs and their associated shorelands, together with the
lands underlying them except:
1. Shorelines of statewide significance;
2. Shorelines on segments of streams upstream of a point where the mean
annual flow is 20 cubic feet per second or less and the wetlands
associated with such upstream segments; and
141
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
5
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
3. Shorelines on lakes less than 20 acres in size and wetlands associated
with such small lakes.
Shorelines of statewide significance means those areas defined in RCW
90.58.030 and limited in the City of Medina to Lake Washington.
Short term rental means a lodging use, that is not a hotel or motel or bed and
breakfast, in which a dwelling unit, or portion thereof, is offered or provided to a
guest by a short-term rental operator for a fee for fewer than thirty consecutive
nights.
Sign means any medium visible to the public including its structure and
component parts which is used or intended to be used out of doors to convey a
message to the public or otherwise attract attention to its subject matter, for
advertising or any other purposes.
Sign, A-board means a portable sign consisting of two sign faces hinged at
the top and separated at the bottom to make it self-standing.
Sign area means the area of the face of the sign. When a dimensional sign
contains information on two sides of the sign, only one side is counted in
determining sign area, except A-board signs where the average area of the two
faces shall be used to determine sign area.
Sign, banner means a sign made of lightweight fabric or similar material that
is temporarily mounted to a pole or building by one or more edge. National, state
or municipal flags, or the official flag of any institution, shall not be considered
banners.
Sign, commercial means a sign containing commercial content used for
identifying a building, use, business or event, or to advertise the sale of goods,
products, events or services. This includes real estate and event signs.
Sign face means the surface upon, against or through which the letters, numerals,
figures, symbols, logos and graphic elements comprising the content or message
of a sign is displayed or illustrated, not including the sign support structure, or
architectural features of a building.
1. In the case of freestanding signs, the sign face shall include the entire
area of the sign panel, cabinet or face substrate including borders upon
which the sign message is displayed or illustrated. See Figure 1.
Figure 1
2. In the case of signs displayed on or mounted to buildings or fences, the
sign face shall include the area of the entire panel, cabinet or face
substrate upon which the sign message is displayed including framed,
painted or illuminated borders that contrast the sign from the background
of the building or fence. See Figure 2.
142
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
6
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
Figure 2
3. In the case of signs consisting of individual letters and/or individual
graphic elements painted or affixed to a building or structure, the sign
face shall comprise the sum of the geometric figures or combination of
regular geometric figures drawn using connected straight lines closest to
the edge of the letters or separate graphic elements comprising the sign
message. See Figure 3.
Figure 3
Sign, freestanding means a sign attached to a self-supporting structure such
as columns, poles, or braces placed in or upon the ground.
Sign height means the total vertical measurement of a sign including all
components of the sign and the sign's support structure.
Sign, illuminated means a sign characterized using artificial light, either
projecting through its surface (internally or trans-illuminated), or reflecting off its
surface (externally illuminated).
Sign, location identity means signs that identify address numbers, property
owners, and/or geographic areas such as neighborhoods and subdivisions.
Sign, mounted means a sign that is applied or affixed to a building, wall or
fence.
Sign, municipal means a sign erected by the City of Medina, or its authorized
representatives, for the safety, convenience or information of its citizens, including,
but not limited to, traffic control signs, legal notices, city entrance signs, and signs
announcing public and community events, meetings, and activities.
Sign, noncommercial means a sign containing noncommercial content used
for identifying a building, use, or event, or to advertise noncommercial matters,
excluding municipal signs.
Sign, off-site means any sign that advertises or relates to an event, activity,
use, good, product, or service that is not available on the premises upon which the
sign is erected.
Sign, on-site means any sign that advertises or relates to an event, activity,
use, good, product, or service that is lawfully permitted to be offered, sold, traded,
provided, or conducted at the location or premises upon which the sign is erected.
143
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
7
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
Sign, permanent means any sign which is affixed to the ground or to any
permanent structure or building, including walls, awnings and fences, in such a
manner that it cannot be moved or transported with ease, and which is intended to
remain in one location and position for an extended period of time.
Sign, real estate and events means a temporary sign that is for the sole
purpose of advertising a parcel, tract, lot, site or home for rent, lease or sale; for
advertising the sale of a home's household belongings; or which identifies an
individual or company performing an active construction project that has obtained
building permits under MMC 16.40.010(A) or (B), and which construction activity
is visible from a public street right-of-way, including remodels. For purposes of this
definition, "construction projects" shall not include routine maintenance of property
such as landscaping care.
Sign support structure means any structure designed specifically for the
support of a sign and which does not form part of the sign proper or of the display.
Sign, temporary means a sign displaying either commercial or noncommercial
messages which is not permanently affixed to the ground or any permanent
structure or building and which is capable of being moved or transported with ease.
Sign, window means a sign affixed to the surface of a window with its
message intended to be visible to the exterior environment.
Significant tree means a tree of at least six-inch DBH size and of a species
as identified on the "City of Medina List of Suitable Tree Species" as set forth in
Chapter 16.52 MMC.
Single-family dwelling means a dwelling unit which is occupied as, or
designed or intended for occupancy as, a residence by one family operating as a
single housekeeping unit and may include family guests and/or household staff.
The owner of the single-family dwelling may provide lodging to persons who are
not guests and who are not part of a family provided the total number of persons,
including nonfamily persons living in the dwelling, does not exceed three, excluding
children with familial status within the meaning of Title 42 United States Code,
Section 3602(k). The limitation on the number of nonfamily persons living in the
dwelling shall not apply to adult family homes, family day-care providers' home
facilities as prescribed by RCW 35A.63.215, and other living arrangements which
would violate Title 42 United States Code, Section 3604.
Single-family dwelling, detached means a separate unconnected single-
family dwelling surrounded by open space and yards and which contains one
dwelling unit and up to one accessory dwelling unit. A detached single-family
dwelling may have detached accessory buildings including, but not limited to,
garages, accessory recreational facilities, cabanas and similar residential
accessories having no more than one room plus a bathroom and otherwise not
designed as an independent residence.
Single-family zones means those zones where single-family detached
residences are the predominant land use.
144
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
8
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
Single housekeeping unit means one or more person(s) who jointly have
common access to and common use of all living, kitchen, and eating areas within
the dwelling unit and household activities and responsibilities such as meals,
chores, expenses and maintenance of the premises are shared or carried out
according to a household plan or other customary method.
Soil survey means the most recent soil survey for the local area or county by
the National Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Spa. See definition under "hot tub."
Species means any group of animals classified as a species or subspecies
as commonly accepted by the scientific community.
Species, endangered means any fish or wildlife species or subspecies that is
threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range and is
listed by the state or federal government as an endangered species.
Species of local importance means those species of local concern due to their
population status or their sensitivity to habitat manipulation, or that are game
species.
Species, priority means any fish or wildlife species requiring protective
measures and/or management guidelines to ensure their persistence as
genetically viable population levels as classified by the Department of Fish and
Wildlife, including endangered, threatened, sensitive, candidate and monitor
species, and those of recreational, commercial, or tribal importance.
Species, threatened means any fish or wildlife species or subspecies that is
likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout
a significant portion of its range without cooperative management or removal of
threats, and is listed by the state or federal government as a threatened species.
Sport court means an area of ground defined by permanent surfacing,
equipment and/or fencing for the purpose of playing tennis, badminton, basketball
and similar social games.
Stacked flat means dwelling units in a residential building of no more than
three stories on a residential zoned lot in which each floor may be separately
rented or owned.
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) means environmental review
procedures required under Chapter 43.21C RCW, Chapter 197-11 WAC, and
Chapter 16.04 MMC.
Steep slope means any area with a slope of 40 percent or steeper and with a
vertical relief of ten or more feet except areas composed of consolidated rock. A
slope is delineated by establishing its toe and top and measured by averaging the
inclination over at least ten feet of vertical relief.
Story means that portion of a building included between the upper surface of
any floor and the upper surface of the floor next above, except that the topmost
story shall be that portion of a building included between the upper surface of the
topmost floor and the ceiling or roof.
Stream means a course or route, formed by nature or modified by humans
and generally consisting of a channel with a bed, banks, or sides throughout
substantially all its length, along which surface waters, with some regularity
145
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
9
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
(annually in the rainy season), naturally and normally flow in draining from higher
to lower lands. This definition does not include specially designed irrigation and
drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, stormwater runoff devices, or other
courses unless they are used by salmonids or to convey watercourses that were
naturally occurring prior to construction.
Street means a right-of-way, opened or unopened developed or undeveloped,
that is intended for motor vehicle travel or for motor vehicle access to abutting
property. "Street" includes all the area within the right-of-way, such as roadways,
parking strips, and sidewalks. For the purposes of the zoning code, "street" shall
not include private lanes.
Street frontage means the property line abutting streets.
Structural coverage means the area of a lot covered by structures. (See MMC
16.23.030.)
Structure means that which is erected, built or constructed, including an
edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up or composed
of parts joined together in some definite manner.
Subdivision means the division or redivision of land into five or more lots,
tracts, parcels, sites, or divisions for the purpose of sale, lease, or transfer of
ownership.
Subdivision, accumulative short means multiple short subdivisions of
contiguous existing lots held under common ownership, which would result in the
creation of five or more lots within a five-year period of the initial short subdivision
approval. "Ownership" for the purpose of this definition means ownership as
established at the date of the initial short subdivision approval.
Subdivision, short means the division or redivision of land into four or fewer
lots, tracts, parcels, sites, or divisions for the purpose of sale, lease, or transfer of
ownership. While a short unit lot subdivision is a type of short subdivision, it is
limited to the creation of no more than the number of lots established as the
maximum unit density set forth in MMC 16.21.060 for the purposes of middle
housing.
Subdivision, short unit lot means a type of subdivision that allows a parent lot
to be divided into no more than the number of lots established as the maximum
unit density set forth in MMC 16.21.060 within a development that also includes
common areas and that is approved through the unit lot subdivision process. A unit
lot subdivision is a type of short subdivision that is created for the purpose of
splitting a single residential lot into lots for the construction of middle housing. A
short unit lot subdivision is a type of lot split.
Subdivision, zero lot line means a type of short unit lot subdivision whereby
there is reduced building setbacks from the new lot line. The standards set forth in
MMC 16.73.095 apply to zero lot line subdivisions.
Substantial destruction means damage of any origin that is voluntarily or
involuntarily sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to
its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 60 percent of the fair market
value of the structure before the damage occurred. Substantially means significant
146
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
10
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
in the size or amount and has a noticeable impact on the current situation to a
degree that would satisfy a reasonable person as significant.
Substantially means significant in the size or amount and has a noticeable
impact on the current situation to a degree that would satisfy a reasonable person
as significant.
Support structures means the structure to which signs, antennas or other
necessary associated hardware are mounted, including, but not limited to, lattice
towers, monopoles, utility support structures, and existing nonresidential buildings.
Swimming pool means any artificially constructed water-holding device that
has a minimum depth of 42 inches and is of sufficient size for swimming, wading,
immersion, or therapeutic purposes.
Section 3. Section 16.73.020 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.73.020. Applicability.
A. This chapter shall apply to all divisions of land including short subdivisions, short
unit lot subdivisions, subdivisions, and lot line adjustments hereafter established
within the incorporated areas of the City of Medina.
B. This chapter is applied in conjunction with Chapter 2.72 MMC, Hearing Examiner;
Chapter 14.04 MMC, SEPA Model Ordinance; Chapters 16.00 through 16.37 MMC,
zoning; Chapters 16.60 through 16.67 MMC, Medina shoreline master program;
Chapter 16.50 MMC, Critical Areas; Chapter 16.80 MMC, Project Permit Review
Procedures, and other applicable codes referencing this chapter.
Section 4. Section 16.73.060 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.73.060. Survey requirements.
A. A Washington State licensed land surveyor registered pursuant to Chapter 18.43
RCW shall prepare, stamp, and seal all proposed lot subdivisions.
B. A survey is required for all final approvals of lot line adjustments, short subdivisions,
short unit lot subdivisions, and subdivisions and shall meet the survey standards of
Chapter 58.09 RCW and Chapter 332-130 WAC.
C. The surveyor shall certify on the final document to be recorded that it is a true and
correct representation of the lands actually surveyed.
D. Whenever a survey reveals a discrepancy, the discrepancy shall be noted on the face
of the subdivision. "Discrepancy" means: (1) a boundary hiatus; (2) an overlapping
boundary; or (3) a physical appurtenance, which indicates encroachment, lines of
possession, or conflict of title.
Section 5. Section 16.73.080 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
147
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
16.73.080. Review procedures and approvals.
Each lot line adjustment and division of land is processed as a different action type
as described in MMC 16.80.050 and summarized as follows:
A. Approval of a lot line adjustment application is a two step process, which
includes final approval by the director and recording with the King County
auditor.
B. Approval of a division of land is a four step process including preliminary
approval, installation or bonding of required improvements, final approval, and
recording with the King County auditor. The process summarizes as follows:
1. Short subdivision.
a. A preliminary short subdivision or preliminary short unit lot subdivision
is processed as a Type 2 decision pursuant to Chapter 16.80 MMC.
b. Installation of infrastructure improvements as determined by the city,
or providing a form of security as determined by the city to ensure such
improvements are installed.
c. A final short subdivision or final short unit lot subdivision is processed
as a Type 1 decision pursuant to Chapter 16.80 MMC.
d. The final short subdivision or final short unit lot subdivision shall be
submitted to the director within five years of the date that the
preliminary approval became final or the short subdivision shall
become null and void.
e. The director's signature is required on the final short plat.
2. Subdivision.
a. A preliminary subdivision is processed as a Type 3 decision pursuant
to Chapter 16.80 MMC.
b. Installation of infrastructure improvements as determined by the city,
or providing a form of security as determined by the city to ensure such
improvements are installed.
c. A final subdivision is processed as a Type 2 decision pursuant to
Chapter 16.80 MMC.
d. The final subdivision shall be submitted to the director within five years
of the date that the preliminary approval became final or the
subdivision shall become null and void.
e. The following signatures on the final plat are required before the
director can submit the final plat to the city council for their action:
i. Director: Whose signature approves compliance with all terms of
the preliminary plat approval of the proposed plat subdivision or
dedication.
ii. City engineer: Whose signature approves the layout of streets,
alleys and other rights-of-way, design of bridges, sewage and water
systems and other structures.
iii. City of Bellevue utilities: Whose signature approves the adequacy
of the proposed means of sewage disposal and water supply.
iv. King County treasurer: Whose signature confirms a statement that
all taxes and delinquent assessments for which the property may
be liable as of the date of certification have been duly paid, satisfied
or discharged.
148
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
12
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
v. Property owner: Whose signature confirms a statement that the
subdivision has been made with the free consent and in accordance
with the desires of the owner.
f. The city council may authorize the mayor to sign an approved final
plat.
Section 6. Section 16.73.090 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.73.090. Approval criteria—Lot line adjustment, short subdivision, short unit lot
subdivision, and subdivision.
The following criteria shall be used to review and approve lot line adjustments,
preliminary short subdivisions and subdivisions:
A. Lot line adjustments.
1. Does not create any additional lot, tract, parcel, or division of land;
2. Does not create a lot, tract, parcel, site, or division of land which contains
insufficient area or dimension to meet the minimum requirements for area
and dimensions as set forth in the Medina Municipal Code;
3. Does not create or diminish any easement or deprive any parcel of
access or utilities; and
4. Does not create or increase the nonconformity of structures, lots, or other
factors with respect to development standards.
B. Preliminary short subdivisions and preliminary subdivisions.
1. The proposal is in conformance with the comprehensive plan, shoreline
master program, and any other city-adopted plans;
2. Provisions have been made for water, storm drainage, erosion control and
sanitary sewage disposal for the subdivision that are consistent with
current standards and plans as adopted in city code or ordinance;
3. Provisions have been made for roads, utilities, street lighting, street trees
and other improvements that are consistent with the zoning code, Chapter
16.90 MMC, and engineering standards;
4. Provisions have been made for dedications, easements and reservations;
5. The proposal complies with the relevant requirements of the zoning code
and all other relevant local regulations;
6. Appropriate provisions are made for:
a. The public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open
spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys or other public ways,
transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds and all other
relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and
from school; and
b. The public use and interest will be served by the platting of such
subdivision and dedication.
C. Short unit lot subdivision.
1. Applicability.
a. The provisions of this subsection apply exclusively to the
short unit lot subdivision of land proposed to be developed as
149
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
13
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
middle housing with attached or detached dwellings in all zoning
residential districts in which residential dwellings are permitted.
b. This subsection may only be utilized for the division of lots
which either meet the minimum lot size for the underlying zone or
are legal non-conforming lots that existed prior to June 30, 2025.
c. Unless expressly modified by this section, all provisions
applicable to short subdivisions, including subsection B above, are
also applicable to short unit lot subdivisions.
2. General Requirements.
a. Unit lots shall be subject to all applicable requirements of
the City’s zoning code, except as otherwise modified by this section.
b. Subdivision of middle housing units on a single lot. A
short unit lot subdivision proposed for a residential lot shall be
limited such that the maximum number of lots shall be no greater
than the maximum number of dwelling units on a lot as set forth in
MMC 16.21.060. In addition, each unit lot shall be entirely outside
of a critical area and shoreline buffers, and building setbacks shall
be required from any critical area buffer consistent with Subtitles
16.5 and 16.6 of the Medina Municipal Code.
c. Development on individual unit lots within the unit lot
subdivision need not conform to the minimum lot area, minimum
density, or dimensional requirements; provided, however, that any
structure located upon a unit lot shall comply with the maximum
building height requirements and the density requirements for the
underlying zone. The overall development of the parent lot must
meet the development and design standards of the underlying
zone, including the maximum density. The maximum lot coverage
for the underlying zone shall apply collectively to all properties
within the unit lot subdivision based on the maximum lot coverage
for the parent lot prior to subdivision. In addition, if the lot maximum
is increased under MMC 16.73.090.C.2.b based on the
development of one or more accessory dwelling units, then the
usage of those lots shall be permanently restricted to use for an
accessory dwelling unit and may not be converted for use for a
different type of dwelling unit.
d. Within the parent lot, required parking for the dwelling
units may be provided on a different unit lot than the lot with the
dwelling unit if the right to use that parking is formalized by an
easement recorded with the King County Recorder's Office.
e. A short unit lot subdivision shall make adequate
provisions through easements for ingress, egress, emergency
services, and utilities access to and from each unit lot created by
reserving such common areas or other areas over, under, and
across the parent lot as necessary to comply with all applicable
development standards. Such easements shall be recorded with
the King County Recorder ’s Office.
f. Access easements, joint use agreements, and
maintenance agreements identifying the rights and responsibilities
of property owners and any homeowners association shall be
executed for use and maintenance of common garage, parking, and
vehicle access areas, landscaping, underground utilities, common
150
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
14
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
open space, exterior building facades and roofs, any portions of the
parent lot not subdivided for individual unit lots, and other similar
features, and shall be recorded with the King County Recorder's
Office.
g. If the development includes zero lot line residential
development, the performance standards contained in MMC
16.73.095 will also apply.
3. Notes on Plat. Notes shall be placed on the plat recorded with
the King County Recorder's Office to state the following:
a. The title of the plat shall include the phrase “Short Unit
Lot Subdivision.”
b. The individual unit lots are not separate buildable lots.
Additional development of the individual unit lots may be limited as
a result of the application of development standards to the parent
lot.
c. Approval of the design and layout of the development was
granted by the review of the development as a whole on the parent
lot.
d. Additional development of the individual unit lots,
including but not limited to reconstruction, remodel, maintenance,
addition, or changes in use shall comply with conditions of approval
of the short unit lot subdivision and may be limited as a result of the
application of development standards to the parent lot or other
applicable regulations.
e. Subsequent platting actions, additions, or modifications
to any buildings may not create a nonconformity of the parent lot
nor create any additional lots.
e. Additional divisions of land which create a new lot shall
not be permitted in this Short Unit Lot Subdivision.
Section 7. A new Section 16.73.095 is hereby added to the Medina Municipal Code to
read as follows:
16.73.095 Lot segregations – Zero-lot-line development.
In any zone where zero-lot-line development is permitted, interior
setbacks may be modified during the short unit lot subdivision review as
follows:
A. If a building is proposed to be located within a normally required
interior setback:
1. An easement shall be provided on the abutting lot of the
subdivision that is wide enough to ensure a 10-foot separation
between the walls of structures on adjoining lots, except as
provided for common wall construction;
2. The easement area shall be free of permanent structures
and other obstructions that would prevent normal repair and
maintenance of the structure’s exterior;
3. Buildings utilizing reduced setbacks shall not have doors
that open directly onto the private yard areas of abutting property.
Windows in such buildings shall not be oriented toward such private
yard areas unless they consist of materials such as glass block,
151
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
15
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
textured glass, or other opaque materials, and shall not be capable
of being opened, except for clerestory-style windows or skylights;
and
4. The final short plat shall show the approximate location of
buildings proposed to be placed in a standard setback area.
B. In the residential zones, setbacks on existing individual lots may
be modified; provided, that the standards set forth in subsection (A)(1) of
this section are met.
Section 8. Section 16.73.100 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.73.100. Submittal requirements.
An applicant seeking approval of a lot line adjustment, preliminary short
subdivision, preliminary short unit lot subdivision, or preliminary subdivision must
submit a complete application requesting approval. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to provide all of the necessary information before the application is
processed. In conjunction with the appropriate fee, a complete application under
this chapter shall include, but is not limited to, the following:
A. Application shall be made on the appropriate forms prescribed by the city
and shall be signed and dated by the property owner or authorized agent.
When an authorized agent is involved, they shall provide proof they
represent the legal interests of the property owner.
B. The application shall contain each of the following:
1. The name, address and telephone number of the applicant and
person to be contacted;
2. The King County assessor's tax identification number;
3. The name, address and telephone number of the owner of the
property;
4. Address or location of the property to be subdivided;
5. Legal description of the property (from the title report verbatim);
6. The existing zone classification of the property;
7. The existing shoreline environmental designation if any land is
within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark as defined by RCW
90.58.030(2)(b);
8. Approximate project site lot area in acres;
9. The range of lot sizes in square feet.
C. Plan drawings.
1. All drawings shall be to scale on an 18-inch by 24-inch sheet of
paper (multiple sheets may be used in order to provide clarity).
2. Lot line adjustment. In addition to the illustrations prescribed in
subsection (C)(3) of this section, plan drawings for lot line
adjustments shall include the following:
a. The final lot boundaries shall be shown with a heavier line
weight to clearly distinguish them from existing boundaries;
b. A full and correct legal description of the revised lots; and
c. Comply with the survey requirements set forth in MMC
16.73.060.
3. Preliminary short plat/plat. Drawings shall include the following
illustrations:
152
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
16
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
a. Location of the site by section, township, range;
b. North arrow and the boundary of the lands being divided or
having the boundaries adjusted;
c. Scale at not less than one inch equals 100 feet (larger scales
such as 1:50, 1:20, and 1:30 are preferred);
d. Vicinity map showing the site clearly marked (smaller scale
than 1:100 is acceptable);
e. The proposed layout and dimensions of lots and tracts;
f. The name of any adjacent subdivisions;
g. The approximate location, names and width of all existing and
proposed streets, roads, private lanes and access easements
within the boundaries of the lands being affected;
h. The location of existing and proposed improvements such as
storm water facilities, sidewalks, utilities, power poles, etc.,
within the boundaries of the lands being affected and adjacent
lots;
i. All existing and/or proposed easements or divisions proposed
to be dedicated for any public purpose or for the common use
of the property owners of the lands being subdivided;
j. A full and correct description of the lands being divided or
having the lot lines adjusted;
k. Approximate location of existing structures and other
improvements located on the site and whether such structures
are proposed to remain on the property;
l. Shorelines, streams, wetlands, wildlife habitat conservation
areas, and geologically hazardous areas as defined in Chapter
16.50 MMC, Critical Areas, and the shoreline master program;
m. Topographical information showing existing contour lines at
intervals of two feet elevation; and
n. For short unit lot subdivisions, show the boundaries of the
parent lots and unit lots, show areas of common use, show
ingress and ingress, show all setback lines, and show the
general building footprints for the proposed unit lots.
D. Reduced plan drawing consisting of an 11-inch by 17-inch reproducible
copy of the site plan containing the information prescribed in subsection
(B) of this section, except this provision shall not apply to a lot line
adjustment.
E. Title report issued within 30 days of application, showing all persons
having an ownership interest, a legal description describing exterior
boundary of application site and listing all encumbrances affecting the
site.
F. Public notice packet as required by the corresponding application.
G. Environmental (SEPA) checklist for a subdivision application.
H. Water and sewer availability from city of Bellevue utilities (not applicable
to a lot line adjustment).
I. Perimeter lot closures for all lots, tracts, and the exterior boundary.
J. Any related information and/or studies (including but not limited to storm
drainage report and critical areas report) required by other provisions of
the Medina Municipal Code, identified in the preapplication meeting, or
deemed necessary by the director.
153
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
17
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
Section 9. Section 16.73.110 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.73.110. Approval criteria—Final short subdivision and subdivision.
The following criteria shall be used to review and approve a final short subdivision,
final short unit lot subdivision, and final subdivision:
A. Conforms to all terms of the preliminary approval;
B. Meets all zoning and engineering requirements;
C. Meets all requirements of this chapter;
D. Meets all applicable local and state laws that were in effect at the time of
vesting; and
E. Improvements have been constructed, or a bond or other security has been
secured at 130 percent of the estimated construction value accepted by the
city.
Section 10. Section 16.73.120 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
16.73.120. Submittal requirements—Final short subdivision and
subdivision.
An applicant seeking final approval of a short subdivision, short unit lot
subdivision, or subdivision must submit a complete application requesting
approval. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide all of the necessary
information before the application is processed. In conjunction with the appropriate
fee, a complete application for a final subdivision approval shall contain, but is not
limited to, the following:
A. Application shall be made on the appropriate forms prescribed by the city
and shall be signed and dated by the property owner or authorized agent.
B. Final plan drawings.
1. All drawings shall be to scale on an 18-inch by 24-inch sheet of
paper (multiple sheets may be used);
2. Contain the illustration and information set forth in MMC
16.73.100(C)(3), except the director may approve a scale up to one
inch equals 200 feet in order to fit the layout of a plat on a single
sheet;
3. Meet the survey requirements set forth in MMC 16.73.060;
4. Include addressing of individual lots assigned by the city;
5. Certificate for the approval signatures detailed in MMC 16.73.080;
6. Treasurer's certificate to ensure payment of taxes; and
7. Other information requested during the preliminary short plat or plat
approval.
C. If the short subdivision, short unit lot subdivision, or subdivision includes
a dedication, the following statements shall be included:
1. The dedication of all streets and other areas to the public, and
individual or individuals, religious society or societies, or to any
corporation, public or private, as shown on the plat;
2. A waiver of all claims for damages against any governmental
authority which may be occasioned to the adjacent land by the
established construction, drainage and maintenance of said road;
154
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
18
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
3. Said statements shall be signed and acknowledged before a notary
public by all parties having any interest in the lands subdivided.
D. Lot numbering. Lots shall be consecutively numbered; tracts shall be
lettered alphabetically and in consecutive order.
E. Plat certificates. Three copies of a plat certificate for the subject property
shall accompany a final subdivision application.
F. Perimeter lot closures for all lots, tracts, and the exterior boundary.
G. For short unit lot subdivisions, the following notes shall be included on
the face of the plat:
1. The title of the plat shall include the phrase “Short Unit Lot
Subdivision.”
2. The individual unit lots are not separate buildable lots. Additional
development of the individual unit lots may be limited as a result of
the application of development standards to the parent lot.
3. Approval of the design and layout of the development was granted
by the review of the development, as a whole, on the parent lot.
4. Additional development of the individual unit lots, including but not
limited to reconstruction, remodel, maintenance, addition, or
changes in use shall comply with conditions of approval of the unit
lot subdivision and may be limited as a result of the application of
development standards to the parent lot or other applicable
regulations.
5. Subsequent platting actions, additions, or modifications to any
buildings may not create a nonconformity of the parent lot nor create
any additional lot.
6. Additional divisions of land which create a new lot shall not be
permitted in this Short Unit Lot Subdivision.
Section 11. Section 16.73.140 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
16.73.140. Recording with county auditor.
All lot line adjustments, final short subdivisions, final short unit lot
subdivisions, and final subdivisions shall be filed for record with the office of the
King County auditor. The applicant shall furnish three copies of the recorded
document to the city and one copy shall be filed with the King County assessor.
Section 12. Section 16.73.150 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
16.73.150. Expiration of final approval.
Approvals of lot line adjustments, final subdivisions, final short unit lot
subdivisions, and final short subdivisions shall automatically expire if the plans are
not recorded within one year of the written approval date.
155
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
19
10998298.4 - 371096 - 0025
Section 13. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase
of this ordinance.
Section 14. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published by an approved summary
consisting of the title.
Section 15. Corrections. Upon the approval of the city attorney, the city clerk, and/or
the code publisher is authorized to make any necessary technical corrections to this ordinance,
including but not limited to the correction of scrivener’s/clerical errors, references, ordinance
numbering, section/subsection numbers, and any reference thereto.
Section 16. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect at 12:01 AM on July 1, 2025,
which is at least five days after publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA ON THE XX DAY OF XX
2024 BY A VOTE OF X FOR, X AGAINST, AND X ABSTAINING, AND IS SIGNED IN
AUTHENTICATION OF ITS PASSAGE THE XX DAY OF XX 2024.
_________________________
Jessica Rossman, Mayor
Approved as to form: Attest:
Inslee Best Doezie & Ryder, P.S.
________________________________ _____________________________
Jennifer R. Robertson, City Attorney Aimee Kellerman, City Clerk
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.: / AB
156
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON
Ordinance No. xxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MEDINA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE MEDINA UNIFIED
DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE
MIDDLE HOUSING LAWS (TO INCORPORATE
REQUIREMENTS IN ESSHB 1110 AND ESSB 2321 AND
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REQUIREMENTS IN EHB 1337);
MAKING REVISIONS TO THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE
MEDINA MUNICIPAL CODE (MMC) 16.00.020, 16.12.040,
16.12.050, 16.12.140, 16.12.210, 16.12.220, 16.20.010, 16.20.020,
16.21.030, 16.21.060, 16.30.060, 16.34.020, ADDING A NEW
SECTION 16.30.090, AND MAKING A HOUSEKEEPING
CHANGE TO 16.30.010; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND
CORRECTIONS; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the State Legislature adopted legislation regarding middle housing (ESSHB
1110 and ESSB 2321) and imposed requirements on cities to bring their land use codes into
compliance with that legislation; and
WHEREAS, Medina is classified as a “Tier 3 city” under the middle housing legislation and
is required to have a compliant code by June 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the State legislature also adopted requirements for accessory dwelling units
in EHB 1337 and imposed requirements on cities to bring their land use codes into compliance
with that legislation by June 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, under the middle housing legislation, Medina is required to allow two dwelling
units on any lot that is zoned for residential development; and
WHEREAS, under the accessory dwelling unit legislation, Medina is required to allow up
to two accessory dwelling units on certain residential lots with single-family homes, but only up to
the density requirements in the middle housing legislation; and
WHEREAS, in order to ensure consistency between state law and the Medina Municipal
Code (MMC), certain updates are required; and
WHEREAS, a draft code update was provided to Commerce on January 31, 2025 for early
review; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance was submitted to the Department of Commerce for 60-day
review on March 25, 2025; and
157
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
WHEREAS, on March 25, 2025, the City’s SEPA official issued a determination of
nonsignificance for the proposed amendments, which was published and provided to the public
in accordance with WAC 197-11-510, and there have been no appeals; and
WHEREAS, the Medina Planning Commission held eight (8) study sessions on this
Ordinance and the Medina City Council held twelve (12) meetings where this Ordinance was
discussed; and
WHEREAS, the City issued a Notice of Public Hearing for the proposed code amendment
at least 15 days prior to the public hearing before the City’s Planning Commission which was
published in the City’s official newspaper and provided to the public in accordance with Title 16
MMC; and
WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to recommend
approval of this Ordinance to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed this Ordinance along with the recommendation
from the Planning Commission during its regularly meeting on April 28, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on this Ordinance on May 12, 2025 to
take additional comment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that it is in the public interest, safety and welfare
to update its code as required by State law; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 16.00.020 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.00.020. Statement of purpose.
A. The UDC is a comprehensive set of regulations that governs the physical
development of all land and water within the City of Medina, except where state-
owned properties are exempt under state law, for the purpose of orderly
development within the community. The UDC consolidates the city's zoning,
platting, environmental, construction and other development regulations into a
one-book source with the goal of providing consistency between different
regulations, and making the ability to find information related to development
easier.
B. The primary purpose of the regulations under this title is to:
1. Encourage and guide development consistent with the goals, policies and
intent of the Medina comprehensive plan;
2. Protect the community's single-family residential nature and the natural
aesthetic quality of the community;
158
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
3. Address both natural and manmade environmental considerations as part
of the project permitting processes;
4. Protect the public's health, safety and welfare as a whole and not create a
duty of protecting any person or class of persons; and
5. Provide appropriate procedures for enforcement of the regulations of this
title.
Section 2. Section 16.12.020 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.12.020. "A" definitions.
Abandoned means the knowing relinquishment of right or claim to the subject
property or structure on that property.
Abandoned sign means a sign which no longer identifies or advertises a bona fide
business, lessor, service, owner, product, or activity, and/or for which no legal owner
can be found.
Access means a way or means of approach to provide vehicular or pedestrian
physical entrance to a property.
Accessory means a use, activity, structure or part of a structure which is subordinate
and incidental to the main activity or structure on the subject property.
Accessory building means a detached building, the use of which is incidental or
secondary to that of the main building. If an accessory building contains bathroom
facilities, a sink, food storage, and food preparation facilities it shall be considered an
accessory dwelling unit.
Accessory dwelling unit means a dwelling unit subordinate to a single-family dwelling
unit which is:
1. Located within the single-family dwelling unit (often referred to as an attached
accessory dwelling unit or AADU); or
2. Located within an accessory building on the lot with a principal single-family
dwelling (often referred to as an detached accessory dwelling unit or DADU).
An accessory dwelling unit that exceeds the size limitations set forth in MMC
16.34.020, is defined as a cottage, if detached, or as a duplex unit if attached to
another dwelling unit.
Adjoining means property that touches or is directly across a street or private lane
from the subject property.
159
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Administrative Design Review means a development permit process whereby an
application is reviewed, approved, or denied by the director or the director’s designee
based solely on objective design and development standards without a public
predecision hearing, unless such review is otherwise required by state or federal law,
or the structure is a designated landmark or historic district established under a local
preservation ordinance. A city may utilize public meetings, hearings, or voluntary
review boards to consider, recommend, or approve requests for variances from
locally established design review standards. Adult family home means a residential
home in which a person or persons provide personal care, special care, room, and
board to more than one but not more than six adults who are not related by blood or
marriage to the person or persons providing the services; provided, however, any
limitation on the number of residents resulting from this definition shall not be applied
if it prohibits the city from making reasonable accommodations to disabled persons
in order to afford such persons equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling as
required by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C. 3604(f)(3)(b).
Agriculture means the use of land for agricultural purposes including any one or more
of farming, apiculture, horticulture, floriculture, and viticulture. "Agriculture" may not
include using, keeping, raising or farming of any animal, and may not include farming
marijuana regardless of whether farmed for medicinal, recreational or research
purposes.
Alter or alteration means:
1. Any change, addition or modification in construction or occupancy.
2. When used with Chapter 16.50 MMC—any human-induced action
which changes and/or impacts the existing conditions of a critical area or
buffer. Alterations include, but are not limited to, grading, filling, dredging,
draining, channelizing, cutting of trees, clearing (vegetation), paving,
construction, compaction, excavation, dumping, demolition, or any other
activity that changes the character of the critical area.
Anadromous fish means fish that spawn and rear in fresh water and mature in the
marine environment.
Ancillary facilities means the equipment required for operation of wireless
communications, including, but not limited to, repeaters, radios, cabling, power
meters, ventilation, generators, and other related equipment.
Ancillary use means a use essential for the proper and/or effective function of another
use.
ANSI means the American National Standards Institute.
160
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Antenna means an electrical conductor or group of electrical conductors that transmit
or receive radio waves or microwaves.
Antenna, directional (or panel) means an antenna that receives and transmits signals
in a directional pattern typically encompassing an arc of 120 degrees.
Antenna, omni-directional (or whip) means an antenna that receives and transmits
signals in a 360-degree pattern, and which is four inches or less in diameter and 15
feet or less in height.
Antenna, parabolic (or dish) means a bowl-shaped device that receives and transmits
signals in a specific directional pattern.
Antenna, tubular panel means an antenna which is 18 inches or less in diameter and
less than eight feet in height, and which is capable of receiving or transmitting signals
in a 360-degree pattern. This includes a configuration of multiple panel antennas
located within a single shroud that gives the appearance of a single antenna.
Applicant means a person who applies for any permit or approval to do anything
governed by this Code and who is the owner of the subject property, the authorized
agent of the owner, or the city.
Arbor, bower, trellis means light, open, garden-type structures composed of vertical
and/or horizontal elements without a room which may or may not attach to a building
which is designed, established and installed as a part of the landscape of the
property.
Arborist, city means a person appointed by the city manager or designee with the
criteria that the person is a member of the American Society of Consulting Arborists
or similar professional organization and is an ISA certified arborist. The city arborist
is responsible for evaluating trees according to the International Society of
Arboriculture in evaluating hazardous trees in urban areas.
Auditor, county means the person defined in Chapter 36.22 RCW or the office of the
person assigned such duties under the King County Charter.
Automobile mechanical repair means general repair, rebuilding, or recondition of
engines, motor vehicles, or trailers including incidental repairs and replacement of
parts and motor services. This does not include painting and body work.
Automobile service station means a place where petroleum products are kept for
retail sales for automobiles and other motor vehicles and where repairs, washing,
servicing, greasing, adjusting or equipping of automobiles or other motor vehicles
may be performed; and where grease, anti-freeze, tires, spark-plugs and other
automobile supplies may also be sold incidentally. For the purpose of this definition,
the sale of associated sundry items and the sale of prepared foods for consumption
161
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
off the premises may be allowed in conjunction therewith provided the gross floor
area devoted to the sale of such sundry items and prepared foods does not exceed
160 square feet.
Section 3. Section 16.12.040 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.12.040. "C" definitions.
Caliper, tree means synonym for trunk diameter used to measure the size of nursery
trees. Caliper measurement of the trunk is taken six inches above the ground up to
and including four-inch caliper size. If the caliper at six inches above the ground
exceeds four inches, the caliper is measured at 12 inches above the ground.
Carport means a building or structure or part thereof which is not wholly enclosed
and is used for the parking or storage of passenger vehicles.
Channel migration zone (CMZ) means the lateral extent of active stream channel
movement over the past 100 years. Evidence of active movement over the 100-year
time frame can be inferred from aerial photos or from specific channel and valley
bottom characteristics. A time frame of 100 years was chosen because aerial photos,
maps and field evidence can be used to evaluate movement in this time. A CMZ is
not typically present if the valley width is generally less than two bank full widths, is
confined by terraces, no current or historical aerial photographic evidence exists of
significant channel movement, and there is no field evidence of secondary channels
with recent scour from stream flow or progressive bank erosion at meander bends.
Areas separated from the active channel by legally existing artificial channel
constraints that limit bank erosion and channel avulsion without hydraulic
connections shall not be considered within the CMZ.
City means City of Medina.
Clearing means cutting, grubbing or removing vegetation or other organic plant
material by physical, mechanical, chemical or any other similar means. For the
purpose of this definition of clearing, "cutting" means the severing of the main trunk
or stem of woody vegetation at any point.
Closed-record appeal means an administrative appeal on the record on a project
permit application following an open-record hearing with no or limited new evidence
or information allowed to be submitted and only appeal argument allowed.
Clubhouse means a building used by a club, being an association of persons with a
common interest meeting periodically for shared activity.
Co-location means the use of a single support structure and/or site by more than one
telecommunication carrier of wireless communication.
162
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Commercial means the use of land, building or structure relating to the buying and
selling of goods and services.
Compatible means a building, structure, activity or use that blends with, conforms to,
or is harmonious with the surrounding ecological, physical, visual or cultural
environment.
Compensatory mitigation means replacing project-induced critical area losses or
impacts, and includes, but is not limited to, the following:
1. Restoration. Actions performed to reestablish critical area
functional characteristics and processes that have been lost by alterations,
activities, or catastrophic events within an area that no longer meets the
definition of a critical area.
2. Creation. Actions performed to intentionally establish a critical area
at a site where it did not formerly exist.
3. Enhancement. Actions performed to improve the condition of
existing degraded critical areas so that the functions they provide are of a
higher quality.
Comprehensive plan means the adopted Medina comprehensive plan, listing the
goals and policies regarding land use within the city.
Conditional use, special use means a use permitted in a particular zone only upon
showing that such use in a specified location will comply with all the conditions and
standards for the location or operation of such use as specified and authorized by
law.
Condominium means real property, portions of which are designated for separate
ownership and the remainder of which is designated for common ownership solely
by the owners of those portions. Real property is not a condominium unless the
undivided interests in the common elements are vested in the unit owners, and unless
a declaration and a survey map and plans have been recorded pursuant to chapter
64.34 RCW.
Coniferous trees means those trees that are called evergreen, have needles or
scales for leaves, and bear seeds in protective cones. This includes conifer trees that
lose their needles in the fall.
Contour line means the interconnection of points having the same height above sea
level.
Cost of construction (including maintenance and repairs) means the true value in the
open market of all work required to accomplish the proposed construction, as defined
163
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
by the International Building Code for the purpose of computing building permit fees.
The true value shall include reasonable true market values for the materials and labor
and include normal contractor profit and overhead and design fees, but exclude
Washington State and local sales taxes and permit fees.
Cottage means a detached single-family dwelling unit used as a secondary dwelling
on a property.
Cottage housing means residential units on a lot with a common open space that
either: (a) Is owned in common; or (b) has units owned as condominium units with
property owned in common and a minimum of 20 percent of the lot size as open
space. Cottages are limited in size to no more than 1,500 square feet of gross floor
area with up to 250 square feet for an attached garage. If there are two or more
cottages on a lot prior to subdivision or lot split, then the average gross floor area
size across the multiple cottages shall be no more than 1,500 square feet, with up to
250 square feet of attached garage for each cottage.
Court means a space, open and unobstructed to the sky, located at or above grade
level on a lot and bounded on three or more sides by walls or buildings.
Court of competent jurisdiction means the judicial body empowered to adjudicate the
question under consideration.
Courtyard apartments means attached dwelling units arranged on two or three sides
of a yard or court.
Critical areas means critical areas as defined in RCW 36.70A.030 and amendments
thereto, and this title.
Section 4. Section 16.12.050 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.12.050. "D" definitions.
Day means calendar days.
Deciduous trees means perennial trees that lose all of their leaves at one time of the
year.
Deck means a structure attached to a wall of a building designated, established,
and/or installed to provide for entrance or exit, outdoor living, cooking, and/or
recreation, some sides of which are open and which may or may not have a
permanent overhead covering. (See definitions for "porch" and "veranda.")
Dedication means the deliberate appropriation of land by an owner for any general
and public uses, reserving to himself or herself no other rights than such as are
164
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
compatible with the full exercise and enjoyment of the public uses to which the
property has been devoted.
Development means a change in the use of any land, building, or structure for any
purpose, and shall include the carrying out of any building, engineering construction
or other operation in, on, over or under land, or the construction, addition or alteration
of any building or structure.
Development permits means all permits and associated approvals administered by
the city associated with development.
Development regulations means the controls placed on development or land use
activities including but not limited to building codes, zoning, critical areas, shoreline
master programs, official controls, and subdivisions, together with any amendments
thereto.
Diameter breast height or DBH means the diameter measurement in inches of the
outside bark of a tree trunk, measured at 4½ feet above the surrounding existing
ground surface. The vertical measurement is taken at the mid-slope of the
surrounding ground surface. The DBH for multi-trunk trees forking below the 4½-foot
mark is determined by measuring the diameter of the tree trunk at the narrowest part
of the main stem below the tree fork. The DBH for multi-trunk trees splitting at ground
level is determined by taking the square root of the sum of all squared stem caliper.
See Figures below.
Figures Measuring DBH
Diameter of replacement tree means the replacement tree diameter using caliper as
the measurement. Multi-trunk trees shall be measured by taking one-half the caliper
of up to the three largest trunks and summing them.
Director means the city manager or designee appointed by the city manager to
administer this title or parts of this title.
Dispersion means a type of low impact development best management practice
designed to release surface and stormwater runoff such that the flow spreads over a
165
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
wide area and is located so as not to allow flow to concentrate anywhere upstream
of a drainage channel with erodible underlying granular soils.
Division of land means any segregation of land that creates lots, tracts, parcels, or
sites not otherwise exempted by this title that alters or affects the shape, size or legal
description of any part of the owner's land.
Domesticated animal or pet has the meaning and status assigned in MMC 6.04.005.
Drainage facility means the system of collecting, conveying and storing surface and
storm runoff. Drainage facilities shall include but not be limited to all surface and
stormwater runoff conveyance and containment facilities including streams,
pipelines, channels, ditches, infiltration facilities, retention/detention facilities, and
other drainage structures and appurtenances.
Driveway means an area of the subject property designed to provide vehicular access
to a parking area or structure contained on the subject property.
Driveway apron means that portion of a driveway connecting to a public roadway or
to a private lane. The driveway apron provides a transition between the street,
driveway, and sidewalk (if present).
Duplex means a residential building with two attached dwelling units.
Dwelling means a building used or intended for residential occupancy.
Dwelling unit means one or more rooms or structures providing complete,
independent living facilities for one family, including permanent provisions for living,
sleeping, cooking and sanitation.
Section 5. Section 16.12.140 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.12.140. "M" definitions.
Major transit stop means:
1. A stop on a high capacity transportation system funded or expanded under the
provisions of chapter 81.104 RCW;
2. Commuter rail stops;
3. Stops on rail or fixed guideway systems;
4. Stops on bus rapid transit routes, including those stops that are under
construction.
Manufactured home means a single-family dwelling required to be built in
accordance with regulations adopted under the National Manufactured Housing
Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5401 et seq.).
166
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Marijuana use includes the following:
1. Marijuana cooperative means the same as described in RCW 69.51A.250 and
amendments thereto;
2. Marijuana processor means a person or entity who processes marijuana into
usable marijuana and marijuana-infused products, packages and labels usable
marijuana and marijuana-infused products for sale in retail outlets, and sells
usable marijuana and marijuana-infused products at wholesale to marijuana
retailers;
3. Marijuana producer means a person or entity who produces and sells marijuana
at wholesale to marijuana processors and other marijuana producers;
4. Marijuana retailer means a person or entity who sells usable marijuana and
marijuana-infused products in a retail outlet;
5. Marijuana researcher means a person or entity licensed to produce, process,
and possess marijuana for limited research purposes pursuant to RCW
69.50.372.
The terms in RCW 69.50.101, and amendments thereto, shall be used to interpret
further the meaning of marijuana use.
Mechanical equipment means any machine or system containing moving parts
such as motors, valves, relay switches, compressors, fans or similar components,
including but not limited to those used to circulate and/or condition air, water,
refrigerant, effluent or products of combustion.
Medina tree fund means a fund established by the city for the financial mitigation
for tree removal consistent with Chapter 16.52 MMC. The fund is to be used to
plant trees on public lands as deemed appropriate by the city manager or
designee. In addition, the fund may be used to maintain public trees, develop a
community tree management plan, and to pay costs related to the city ar borist or
other consultants to carry out the purposes of the Medina tree code (Chapter
16.52 MMC).
Middle Housing means buildings that are compatible in scale, form, and character
with single-family houses and contain two or more attached, stacked, or clustered
homes including duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes,
townhouses, stacked flats, courtyard apartments, and cottage housing. Medina will
comply with housing requirements applicable to Tier 3 cities.
Mitigation means avoiding, minimizing or compensating for adverse critical areas
impacts. Mitigation, in the following order of preference, is:
1. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
2. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its
implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps,
such as project redesign, relocation, or timing, to avoid or reduce impacts;
3. Rectifying the impact to wetlands and habitat conservation areas by repairing,
rehabilitating or restoring the affected environment to the conditions existing at
the time of the initiation of the project;
4. Minimizing or eliminating the hazard by restoring or stabilizing the hazard area
through engineered or other methods;
167
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
5. Reducing or eliminating the impact or hazard over time by preservation and
maintenance operations during the life of the action;
6. Compensating for the impact to wetlands and habitat conservation areas by
replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and
7. Monitoring the hazard or other required mitigation and taking remedial action
when necessary.
Mitigation for individual actions may include a combination of the above measures.
MMC means Medina Municipal Code as adopted pursuant to Chapter 1.01 MMC.
Monopole means a single upright pole, engineered to be self-supporting that does
not require lateral cross supports and is sunk into the ground and/or attached to a
foundation.
Section 6. Section 16.12.210 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.12.210. "T" definitions.
Target, when used for assessing hazard trees, means people, property or activities
that could be injured, damaged, or disrupted by a tree.
Target, likelihood of impact means the chance of a target being impacted by a failed
part of a tree. The likelihood of impacting a target can be categorized as follows:
1. Very low. The chance of the failed tree or branch impacting the specific
target is remote;
2. Low. It is not likely that the failed tree or branch will impact the target;
3. Medium. The failed tree or branch may or may not impact the target, with
nearly equal likelihood; or
4. High. The failed tree or branch will most likely impact the target.
in evaluating the likelihood of impacting a target, the occupancy rate of the target
and any factors that could affect the failed tree as it falls towards the target shall be
used in determining the likelihood of impact.
Temporary public facility means a land use and/or facilities owned, operated, and
maintained temporarily by a city government agency, a public or nonprofit school, or
religious organization.
Terrace means a level platform or shelf of earth supported on one or more faces by
a wall, bank of turf, stable inclined grades, or the like.
Tier 3 City means a city with a population of less than 25,000 that is within a
contiguous urban growth area with the largest city in a country with a population of
168
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
more than 275,000, based on 2020 Office of Financial Management population
estimates. The City of Medina is classified as a Tier 3 city.
Title report means the written analysis of the status of title to real property, including
a property description, names of titleholders and how title is held (joint tenancy, etc.),
encumbrances (mortgages, liens, deeds of trusts, recorded judgments), and real
property taxes due.
Townhouses means buildings that contain three or more attached single-family
dwelling units that extend from foundation to roof and that have a yard or public way
on not less than two sides.
Tract means an extended area of land reserved exclusively for a special use such as
open space, surface water retention, utilities, or access. Tracts reserved for a special
use are not considered building sites.
Transitional housing means one or more dwelling units owned, operated, or managed
by a nonprofit organization or governmental entity in which supportive services are
provided to individuals and families that were formerly homeless, with the intent to
stabilize them and move them to permanent housing within a period of not more than
24 months, or longer if the program is limited to tenants within a specified age range
or the program is intended for tenants in need of time to complete and transition from
educational or training or service programs.
Treasurer, county means the person defined in Chapter 36.40 RCW, or the office of
the person assigned such duties under the King County Charter.
Treatment best management practice means a facility designed to remove pollutants
contained in stormwater. Some methods of pollutant removal include
sedimentation/settling, filtration, plant uptake, and bacterial decomposition.
Treatment BMPs include, but are not limited to: vegetated filter strips, oil and water
separators, biofiltration swales, and linear sand filters. Further information can be
found in the stormwater manual adopted under MMC 13.06.020.
Tree means a self-supporting woody perennial plant, excluding a bush or shrub.
Tree, dead means a tree that is no longer alive, has been removed beyond repair, or
is in an advanced state of decline (where an insufficient amount of live tissue, green
leaves, limbs or branches exists to sustain life) and has been determined to be in
such a state by a certified arborist during a nondormant or other natural stage of the
tree that would minimize the likelihood that the tree would be mistakenly identified as
being in such a dead state.
Tree, hedge means a row of smaller trees planted close together and growing in a
dense continuous line 20 feet in length or longer that form a thicket barrier.
169
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Tree protection zone means area identified by the director in which no soil
disturbances are permitted and activities are restricted.
Tree, right-of-way means a tree with at least two-thirds of its trunk diameter on public
right-of-way.
Tree risk means the combination of the likelihood of an event and the severity of the
potential consequences. In the context of trees, risk is the likelihood of a conflict or
tree failure occurring and affecting a target and the severity of the associated
consequences: personal injury, property damage, or disruption of activities. Risk is
evaluated by categorizing or quantifying both the likelihood (probability) of occurrence
and the severity of the consequences.
Tree species means group of trees that resemble each other closely and interbreed
freely.
Tree topping means an inappropriate technique to reduce tree size that cuts through
a stem more than two years old at an indiscriminate location.
Truck gardening means the same as "market gardens," which is the small-scale
production of fruits, vegetables and flowers, frequently sold directly to consumers.
Section 7. Section 16.12.220 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.12.220. "U" definitions.
UDC means Unified Development Code as set forth in this title.
Uncovered means, when used in conjunction with a structure such as decks, stairs,
patios, etc., open above and without cover.
Unit means a dwelling unit of any type.
Unit density means the number of dwelling units allowed on a lot, regardless of lot
size.
Use means any activity, occupation, business or operation carried out, or intended to
be carried on, in a building or other structure or on a parcel of land.
Use, accessory. See definition of "accessory."
Use, principal means the main or primary purpose for which a building, other structure
and/or lot is designed, arranged, or intended, or for which may be used, occupied or
maintained under the Medina Municipal Code.
170
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Utility support structure means poles that support street lights, and poles used to
support electrical, telephone, cable or other similar facilities. These poles are typically
constructed of wood, steel, concrete and composite materials.
Section 8. Section 16.20.010 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.20.010. Comprehensive plan and zoning.
A. The comprehensive plan establishes a community vision for a high-quality
single-family residential setting and the coordinating goals and policies that
support this vision. Development regulations implement the comprehensive plan
by specifying how and for what purpose each parcel of land may be used.
B. Table 16.20.010 prescribes the relationship between the comprehensive plan
and zoning designations by identifying the comprehensive plan land use
designation and the corresponding implementing zoning designations.
Table 16.20.010: Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Comprehensive Plan Land
Use
Designation
Implementing Zone Designations
Single-family
residential Residential,
including single-family,
duplexes, stacked flats,
courtyard apartments, and
cottage housing.
Single-family residence Residential —R16
Single-family residence Residential—R20
Single-family residence Residential—R30
Suburban gardening residential—SR30
Local business Single-family residence Residential—R16
Suburban gardening residential—SR30
Neighborhood auto servicing
Public facility Single-family residence Residential—R16
Parks and public places
School/institution Parks and public places
171
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Utility All
Park All
Open space All
Section 9. Section 16.20.020 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.20.020. Adoption of official zoning map.
A. The zoning map adopted by Ordinance No. 907, and amendments thereto, shall
serve as the City of Medina official zoning map. Said map and all notations,
references, data and other information shown on the official zoning map are
adopted and made part of the UDC.
B. The city is divided into the following zoning districts with the map symbols shown
in parentheses, and which are shown on the official zoning map:
1. Single-family residence Residential R16 (R-16);
2. Single-family residence Residential R20 (R-20);
3. Single-family residence Residential R30 (R-30);
4. Suburban gardening residential SR30 (SR-30);
5. Neighborhood auto servicing (N-A); and
6. Park and public places (Public).
C. The following special zoning map overlays with the map symbols shown in
parentheses are established and shown on the official zoning map:
1. Neighborhood character preservation district—Medina Heights (Medina
Heights); and
2. Planned land use development (PLUD).
D. In addition to the zoning districts and special zoning map overlays, a primary
state highway designation shall apply to the SR 520 right-of-way and be shown
on the official zoning map (state ROW).
172
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Section 10. Section 16.21.030 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
16.21.030. Use table.
Table 16.21.030 establishes those uses which are permitted, those uses subject
to specific development standards, and those uses requiring special approval and
that are prohibited within each zoning district.
Table 16.21.030: Land Use Table
Uses R-16
Zone
R-20
Zone
R-30
Zone
SR-30
Zone
NA
Zone
Public
Zone
Residential Uses
Accessory dwelling units P P P P P P
Accessory recreational facilities A A A A A A
Accessory recreational facilities—Minor L L L L L L
Accessory uses—On-site P P P P P P
Accessory uses—Off-site L L L L L L
Adult family home L L L L L L
Detached, single-family dwelling P P P P P P
Family day care home L L L L L L
Manufactured home L L L L L L
Low rise apartments - - - - - -
Duplex P P P P P P
Stacked flats P P P P P P
Cottage housing P P P P P P
Courtyard apartments P P P P P P
Permanent supportive housing L L L L L L
173
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Transitional housing L L L L L L
Short term rental - - - - - -
Townhouses - - - - - -
Nonresidential Uses
Automobile service station L
Automobile mechanical repair L
Commercial horticulture/truck
gardening/agriculture,
excluding the raising of animals
L
Clubhouse—Public/private
SU SU
Golf course SU SU
Historical use H H
Home business L L L L P P
Hotel/Motel/Transient Lodging -- -- -- -- -- --
Public and Institutional Uses
City government facilities CU
Post office SU
Public safety CU
Public park P P P P P P
Electrical power and utility substation SU SU SU SU SU SU
Accessory recreational facilities—Public P P P P P P
Religious facility SU SU SU SU SU SU
174
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
School—Public/private (preschool to
grade 12)
SU
Temporary city government facilities L L L L P P
Wireless communication facilities SU SU SU SU SU
Shoreline Uses
See Chapter 16.62 MMC for a list of uses within the shoreline jurisdiction.
*See MMC 16.21.020 for explanation of "P," "L," "A," "SU," "CU," and "H."
For limitations on development of Middle Housing, see MMC 16.21.060.B
Section 11. Section 16.21.060 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
16.21.060. Maximum dwelling units on a lot.
A. Where Table 16.21.030 authorizes dwelling uses, only one dwelling unit per
lot is allowed the maximum unit density per lot is limited to two units, except if one
unit is a single-family dwelling unit, then up to two accessory dwelling units meeting
the requirements set forth in MMC 16.34.020 may be allowed on the same lot. If
the lot is developed with two units of middle housing, then no accessory dwelling
units are permitted. for the following:
A. Accessory dwelling units meeting the requirements set forth in MMC
16.34.020; B. The density requirements set forth in subsection “A” above does not
permit middle housing to be developed in the following areas:
1. Portions of a lot, parcel, or tract designated with critical areas designated
under RCW 36.70A.170 or their buffers as required by RCW 36.70A.170,
except for critical aquifer recharge areas where a single-family detached
house is an allowed use provided that any requirements to maintain aquifer
recharge are met.
2. A watershed serving a reservoir for potable water if that watershed is or
was listed, as of July 23, 2023, as impaired or threatened under section
303(d) of the federal clean water act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1313(d))
3. Lots that have been designated urban separators by countywide
planning policies as of July 23,2023.
175
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
4. A lot that was created through the splitting or subdividing of a single
residential lot after June 30, 2025.
B. Detached single-family dwellings provided:
1. The minimum net lot area is equal to or greater than the minimum net lot
area set forth in Table 16.22.020 of the zoning district where the dwellings are
located multiplied by the number of detached single-family dwellings on the lot;
and
2. All development regulations and limitations applicable to buildings in the
zoning district where such dwellings are located are followed.
3. Middle Housing forms compliant with all other MCO development
regulations.
C. The standards of 16.21.060(A) do not apply to lots after subdivision below 1,000
square feet These which lots shall only be permitted to have one dwelling unit per
lot.
D. The standard in 16.21.060(A) may be modified for lots meeting the standards
set forth in MMC 16.30.090 with the use of a development agreement.
Section 12. Section 16.30.010 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
16.30.010. Fences, walls and gates.
A. General provisions.
1. "Walls," as referred to in this section, means freestanding walls meeting the
definition in MMC 16.12.070, and retaining walls and rockeries meeting the
definitions in MMC 16.12.190.
2. Fences, walls and gates may be located within a setback area provided the
fence, wall or gate does not exceed the maximum height requirements set
forth in subsection (B) of this section.
3. Fences, walls and gates shall be located entirely inside the property lines
of a lot, unless both property owners agree the wall or fence may be placed
on a common property line.
4. The property owner is responsible for confirming all fences, walls and/or
gates are placed inside the property lines on their property.
5. Gates located near an opened street right-of-way shall be set back from
the edge of the pavement pursuant to MMC 16.40.120.
6. All lighting devices shall be subject to the height limitations prescribed by
this section.
176
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
7. Where a permit is required pursuant to subsection (G) of this section, the
director may require the property owner to have a land survey performed
to identify the property boundaries if:
a. The fence, wall or gate is adjacent to a street right-of-way; or
b. In the opinion of the director, it is not clear the proposed fence or wall is
located entirely within the property lines on the owner's property.
B. Height. (See Figures 16.30.010(B)(1), (B)(2) and (D)).
1. The maximum height of a fence, wall, combination of fence and wall, or
gate shall not exceed four feet if the structure is located:
a. Within a horizontal distance of five feet from a front property line that
adjoins a public street not designated as a collector or minor arterial street
pursuant to Chapter 10.08 MMC; and
b. Within a horizontal distance of five feet from any property line that
intersects a front property line that adjoins a public street as described in
subsection (B)(1)(a) of this section and extending 30 feet from the front
property line.
2. Except as provided in subsection (B)(1) of this section, the maximum height
of a fence, wall, combination of fence and wall, or gate shall not exceed six
feet in all other setback areas.
3. Fences, walls and gates not located within setback areas may be
constructed to the height limitations of other buildings and structures in the
zoning district in which the fence, wall or gate is located.
For purposes of the height maximums set forth in this section, height shall
be measured at the exterior side of the fence or wall facing outward from
the property, from the lower of the existing or finished grade to the highest
point of the fence or wall (including any light fixtures, caps, or other objects
mounted on the top of the fence or wall).
54. Fences and walls shall be considered combined for the purpose of
measuring height where the horizontal separation is five feet or less
between the closest points of the fence and wall; except, if a property line
is located between the fence and wall, the fence and wall shall not be
considered combined. These requirements shall also apply to gates and
walls.
Figure 16.30.010(B)(1): Height Limits for Fences and Walls
177
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Figure 16.30.010(B)(2): Measuring Fence/Wall Height
C. Fence and wall height exception. The placement of a guard rail on top of a
retaining wall may exceed the maximum height for fences and walls by up to
four feet provided:
1. The building official determines a guard rail is required pursuant to the
building codes set forth in Chapter 16.40 MMC; and
2. The solid component parts of the guard rail are evenly distributed and cover
no more than 50 percent of the total surface area of the side elevation of
the guard rail.
D. Limitations.
1. The following are prohibited:
a. The use of barbed wire with a fence or wall;
b. Electric fences; and
c. Chain-link fences located within five feet of a property line that adjoins a
public street designated as a collector or minor arterial street pursuant to
Chapter 10.08 MMC.
2. No person may construct a berm upon which to build a fence, wall or
combination of a fence and wall, unless the total height of the berm plus
the fence or wall does not exceed the maximum height allowable for the
fence or wall if the berm was not present. (See Figure 16.30.010(D).)
3. No gate or portion thereof shall be located within any public right-of-way or
any easement for a private lane or private lane turnaround.
178
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Figure 16.30.010(D): Fence/Wall with Berm
E. Appearance. The more completely detailed or finished side of a fence or wall shall
face outward from the property on which the fence or wall is located, except joint
projects may have the more finished side oriented as agreed to between the two
property owners.
F. Bulkheads. The design and construction of a bulkhead shall be in compliance
with the requirements of the building code and the Medina shoreline master
program.
G. Permits. A building permit is required to be obtained from the city prior to
construction or repair of a fence, wall or gate, unless exempt pursuant to MMC
16.40.050.
H. Requirement for gates.
1. Every gate blocking vehicular access to a residence must have a "KNOX
Box" or similar device approved by the fire marshal and chief of police
allowing access to emergency vehicles and personnel. In addition, each
gate which relies on electricity to open the locking mechanism or the gate
itself must have a manual release mechanism which is activated by a power
failure, or another method of assuring entry in event of a power failure,
which is approved by the fire marshal and the chief of police.
2. Gates and barriers associated with fire apparatus access roads shall meet
the requirements in MMC 16.40.120.
Section 13. Section 16.30.060 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
16.30.060. Residential off-street parking.
1. Off-street parking for each single-family dwelling shall be provided as follows:
A. If a lot has access from a street, a minimum of two on-site parking spaces
is required;
B. If a lot has access from a private lane, on-site parking spaces shall be
required as follows:
179
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
1. The surface area of each parking space shall be at least 250 square
feet; and
2. The minimum number of parking spaces shall be:
a. In the R-16 zoning district: three spaces;
b. In the R-20 zoning district: four spaces;
c. In the R-30 zoning district: five spaces;
3. Such off-street parking areas shall be separate and distinct from the
easement or turnaround required for the private lane;.
2. Off-street parking for each middle-housing dwelling unit shall be provided as
follows:
A. No off-street parking shall be required within one-half mile walking distance
of a major transit stop.
B. Two off-street parking spaces per unit are required for lots greater than
6,000 square feet.
C. A maximum of one off-street parking space per unit shall be required on lots
no greater than 6,000 square feet before any zero lot line subdivisions or
lot splits.
3. Off-street parking for both single-family residential dwellings as well as middle-
housing shall be as follows subject to the following additional requirements:
A. Additional off-street parking spaces, which are not required, may be
located on site or off site as allowed in MMC 16.34.030; and
B. Parking areas shall not be located within setback areas, except as
allowed otherwise by law.
Section 14. A new Section 16.30.090 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended
to read as follows:
16.30.090 Increased Density for Housing.
The City Council may approve a development agreement to alter the
maximum density requirements set forth in MMC 16.21.060(A) and other
standards as set forth in Chapter 16.76 MMC. Any such development agreement
shall be consistent with the MMC and state law. The Council may prioritize
providing greater flexibility of development standards and greater density based
on the requirement that the housing be affordable to low-income or very low-
income households.
180
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
Section 15. Section 16.34.020 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
16.34.020. Accessory dwelling units.
This section establishes the development criteria that apply to accessory
dwelling units.
A. Accessory dwelling units meeting the requirements of this section are
excluded included within the from density and minimum lot area
requirements.
B. Accessory dwelling units shall be fully contained within and attached to a
single-family dwelling, or must be located within a detached accessory
building.
C. A maximum of tTwo Only one accessory dwelling units may be permitted
on a lot per each single-family dwelling located on the same lot, provided
that the unit density set forth in MMC 16.21.060 for that lot is not otherwise
exceeded. If a lot is developed with a duplex, or with two units meeting the
definition of middle housing, then no accessory dwelling unit is permitted
on that lot.
D. Development standards.
1. The accessory dwelling unit shall comply with the development standards
of the zoning where the accessory dwelling unit is located, including, but
not limited to, minimum lot coverage, setbacks, etc.
2. Accessory dwelling units shall only be allowed on lots that meet the
minimum lot sizes for the principal single-family unit under the code. In
addition, for any lot which is the result of a subdivision or a lot split and
which is below the minimum lot size for the zone, no additional dwelling
units, including accessory dwelling units, shall be allowed.
3. Accessory dwelling units shall not be allowed on any lot that contains
critical areas or buffers or that is not connected to a public sewer system.
4. Accessory dwelling units shall not be allowed within the shoreline
jurisdiction.
2. The accessory dwelling unit shall contain no more than the lesser of 1,000
square feet of gross floor area, or 40 percent of the total square footage
of the gross floor area of the single-family dwelling and accessory dwelling
unit combined.
5. All of the structures on the property shall have the a cohesive and
consistent appearance, including roof shape, glazing, exterior finishing
materials and colors, of a single-family with all other dwelling units and
any other permitted accessory structures on the lot.
181
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
. The entry door to the accessory dwelling unit shall be screened from the
street by portions of the structure or by dense evergreen vegetation.
5. There shall be no sign or other indication of the accessory dwelling unit's
existence other than an address sign and a separate mail box.
6. A certification by City of Bellevue utilities is required indicating that water
supply and sanitary sewage are available to adequately serve the
accessory dwelling unit.
7. Accessory dwelling units may not be used as short-term rentals.
8. The maximum gross floor area for an accessory dwelling unit is 1,000
square feet.
9. The maximum roof height for an accessory dwelling unit is no more than
twenty-five (25) feet, or the maximum height allowed for the primary unit
on the lot, whichever is lower.
E. There shall be one off-street parking space provided for the accessory
dwelling unit, which shall be in addition to any off-street spaces required for
the principal single-family dwelling unit. The only exception for the
accessory dwelling unit off-street parking requirement is when the
accessory dwelling unit is located within one-quarter mile of a major transit
stop.
F. Garage space and other accessory buildings may be converted into an
accessory dwelling unit unless such development would result in the
property exceeding the unit density requirements set forth in MMC
16.21.060. However, if the converted accessory building contained parking,
the minimum parking standards for both the principle single-family unit and
any accessory dwelling unit must be replaced elsewhere on the property.
Nonconforming use rules as set forth in chapter 16.36 MMC apply to any
accessory buildings that are converted which are not consistent with the
applicable codes at the time of conversion. only if the number of covered
garage spaces eliminated by the conversion is replaced by the same
number of covered garage spaces elsewhere on the property.
G. An accessory dwelling unit must contain:
1. Bathroom facilities that include a toilet, sink and a shower or bathtub; and
2. Food storage and preparation facilities and a sink.
H. A property owner seeking to establish a legal accessory dwelling unit shall
apply to register the dwelling unit with the city pursuant to MMC 16.70.070.
The application shall include an agreement, in a form approved by the city,
by the property owner to maintain the accessory dwelling unit in compliance
with the standards set forth in this section.
182
AGENDA ITEM 6.4
11001134.4 - 371096 - 0025
I. After the accessory dwelling unit is approved, a registration form signed by
the record holders of the property shall be recorded with the King County
auditor's office. Said registration form shall contain:
1. The street address and legal description of the property; and
2. The requirement for maintaining the accessory dwelling unit in compliance
with the requirements of this section.
J. The registration of the accessory dwelling unit may be canceled pursuant
to MMC 16.70.070 by the property owner by recording a certificate of
cancellation in a form satisfactory to the city with the King County
department of records and elections. The city may record a notice of
cancellation upon failure to comply with the standards set forth in this
section.
Section 16. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase
of this ordinance.
Section 17. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published by an approved summary
consisting of the title.
Section 18. Corrections. Upon the approval of the city attorney, the city clerk, and/or
the code publisher is authorized to make any necessary technical corrections to this ordinance,
including but not limited to the correction of scrivener’s/clerical errors, references, ordinance
numbering, section/subsection numbers, and any reference thereto.
Section 19. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect at 12:01 AM on July 1, 2025,
which is at least five days after publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA ON THE XX DAY OF XX
2024 BY A VOTE OF X FOR, X AGAINST, AND X ABSTAINING, AND IS SIGNED IN
AUTHENTICATION OF ITS PASSAGE THE XX DAY OF XX 2024.
_________________________
Jessica Rossman, Mayor
Approved as to form: Attest:
Inslee Best Doezie & Ryder, P.S.
________________________________ _____________________________
Jennifer R. Robertson, City Attorney Aimee Kellerman, City Clerk
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.: / AB
183
AGENDA ITEM 6.4