Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 376HI GTON { CITY II�IEI�INA, �. RESOLUTION NO. 376 L{, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EI INA, WASHINGTON AUTHORIZING THE DULY -APPOINTED } ADMINISTERING AGENCY FOR ARCH TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS FOR Y 1 THE FUNDING OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS, A RECOMMENDED BY THE ARCH EXECUTIVE BOARD, UTILIZING I FUNDS FROM THE CI' NERAL FUND ALLOCATION u, e WHEREAS, A regional Coalition for Housing (ARCH) was created by interlocai agreement to help coordinate the efforts of Eastide cities to :provide affordable housing; and r WHEREAS, EREAS, the ARCH Executive Board has recommended that the City of Medina £' participate in the funding of certain affordable housing projects and programs; and L WHEREAS, the ARCH Executive Hoard has developed a number of recommended conditions: to ensure that the City's affordable horsing funds are used for their intended purpose and that projects maintain their affordability overtime, and �s WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the Amended and Restated Interlocal 3= Agreement for ARCH; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to use City funds as to finance the projects recommended by the ,ARCH Executive 'Board; now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITE" OF MEDINA, A_ DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council authorizes the duly -appointed administering agency of i ARCH pursuant to the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement for ARCH to execute all documents and take all necessary actions to enter into Agreements on behalf of the City to $ Congregations For the ; omeless/ CHA and Rarkvieww Services in an amount not to exceed $12,340. Section 2. The Agreements entered into pursuant to Section 1 of this resolution shad be funded in e combined amount not to exceed that set forth in Section 1. Such Agreements shall include terms and conditions to ensure that the City's funds are used for their intended purpose and that the project maintains its affordability over time. In determining what conditions should be included in the Agreements, the duly -appointed administering agency CH shall be guided by the recommendations set forth in the ARCH Executive Board's emo duet of y December 12, 2014, a copy of which is attached hereto a ibit A. 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Counc' of the Ci fdiva this ay March, 01 , and'signed in authentication f its passage t s h day f March, 201 . R rick Boyd, Mayor f Approved as t form Attest., a wmm��a U w M _ .. s Mari Sand, City Attorney Aimee Kellerman, rman, City Clem { Iz Kenyon l isend, PLLC ,r iE Resolution No. 376 page 1 of t x .I mg 14 EXHIBIT A Project aurnmary: Congregations for the Homeless'( F H) with the support of°King County Housing Authority (KCHaA) is applying to ARCH for the acquisition of property to be developed as a permanent winter shelter for men. For the past six years East King County cities have funded two winter shelters: one for unaccompanied men and one for women and families. CF H has operated the men`s emergency winter shelter during that time, at non -permanent locations usually churches or civic buildings, which have sometimes been in single fancily neighborhoods, The erner ency shelter is a low barrier shelter which means few requirements on the shelter guests other than they don't pose a danger to other guests. The �z emergency shelter started out being open only on severe winter nights, but moved to being open all nights from November through March. This application takes the project a next step to a permanent location better looted for shelter guests, and also be able to house daytime services and drop in center. LARCH-rnember planning staff Have already identified a number of locations generally} in or near transit - served centers and near services which would be appropriate for siting the shelter. Initially the shelter and daytime services could operate on a similar schedule as the current facilities -. night time shelter during winter months and daytime services weekdays throughout the year. To the extent there is additional private and/or public funding support, it could expand the period shelter and day services are available. i The proposed shelter is sized to house at least 50 men. It would include kitchen and dining facilities, gathering space, computer lab, staff and counseling offices, a hygiene center including washrooms, showers and laundry, staff laundry, bedding storage area, and sleeping areas. Ultimately the goal is to create a second similar facility for wornen/families. The acquisition could include a building shell which could be renovated foi- the purpose of the shelter/day center, or it could mean new construction. t The ARCH funding in conjunction with an interim Loan front King County would be used to acquire the property. After acquisition, a final budget will be prepared and other permanent funding, will be sought including permanent funding from King County and Mate Housing Trust Fund and a capital campaign by CFH. k i Funding Rationale,: The CAFE supported the intent of'this application for the following reasons: * Provides shelter during winter months for at least 50 men and part time daytime services year round which has been a demonstrated need over the past 5 years in Fast ding County. Is consistent with Countywide Committee to End Homelessness priorities. Operator is respected, and has been successful for six years of operation in serving this population in a winter shelter. Would help address challenges of siting a temporary shelter on an annual basis, * Permanent location would allow it to be better located close to transit and services and not; impact single family neighborhoods. ! Permanent facility would provide opportunity to expand period shelter and day services are available with additional operating funds • Fw::HA as interim owner will allow CF°H to act to secure and hold potential site. While it i not typical to recommend prior to a specific site is identified, it is recognized that. there are special circumstances associated with this proposal. first, there is a temporary location for the shelter that is only available the next two winters and a new location needed by winter 2016. Second, .l acquiring properties in the areas being targeted can be competitive and require relatively quick action to { r a .v. gg EXHIBIT° secure an option. In the recommended conditions, there are several special conditions intended to address these circurnstanees. t PotentialConditions: l; Standard Conditions: Refer to list of standard conditions found at end of this memo w. Special Conditions: t, l . Prier to September 1, 20 15, CFH shall provide to City or Administering agency an update on the status of the project which will include: update on status of site search, updates on the status of the capital campaign and applications for other public funding; updated capital and operating budgets (including, reflecting federal funding requirements), and progress toward being able to meet all r. funding, conditions within the 18 month period :specified in Condition 2. If the City or Administering Agency evaluation indicates that funding conditions cannot be met within the 1 } month funding condition period, (e.g. status of site search, progress tan the capital campaign, application for rather funding, updated budgets), then the ARCH Executive Board will be authorized to have the funding award expire and C FfI will have to reapply to ARCH for fundin;. In the event the first funding condition is net, the funding commitment shall be extended to i eighteen(l ) months from the date of Council approval and shall expire thereafter if all conditions are not satisfied, An extension may be requested to City or Administering Agency no later than sixty (0) days prior to the expiration date. City or administering Agency will consider an extension only can the basis of documented, meaningful progress in bringing the project to readiness or completion. 3. CaF14 will provide a capital campaign strategy by March 2015 which includes key activities and campaign funding target milestones. Sustain operation over time through fundraising and other efforts.;; 4. With the approval of the ARCH Executive Board, up to $50,000 offends may be released for predevelopment expenses including Option money for securing a site, due diligence associated with securing the site and project management during the predeveloprnent phase. The remaining funds E could be released upon all other public funding commitment. . Funds shall be used by CFH toward acquisition' and related due diligence, construction, design and relocation costs. Final designation of use: of funds, including any other project related purpose, must receive written authorization fforn ARCH staff. u. Funds will be in the farm of secured grant with no repayment, so long as affordability and target population is maintained, and the service funds necessary to provide services to this population are i available. i. A covenant is recorded ensuring affordability for at least fifty (0) beds for fifty (50) years at 30% AM] maximum income. Ir 8. Upon identification of any specifics site being considered C FF1 shall notify ARCH and the City where the site is located for review and approval. In addition CF shall furnish to ARCH, for t X 4 i EXHIBIT A review by the Citizen Advisory Board, terms for the site acquisition and updated development and operating budgets. 9, By March 2015, an outreach plan will be submitted to ARCH staff for review and approval. The outreach plan will include provisions such as: • Provide written notification to neighbors upon identification of a suitable site to include description of the project, and information regarding CFfJ that will include the website and contact number • Send out invitations and provide an opportunity for neighbors to individually and/or as a group to meet with CFI -I in an Open House or other format regarding the project during the site feasibility stage. • Strategies for maintaining community communication after development of a specific site, including information about what to do in case something out of the ordinary occurs. 10. As part of the quarterly monitoring report, CFH shall explicitly include any activities related to the neighborhood outreach, plan; and progress of the Capital Campaign including active solicitations, amounts pledged and secured against campaign targets and how funds are allocated to the different prqjects covered by the campaign. 11. Prior to release of funds. the Agency shall submit to ARCH staff for review and approval the winter shelter operating plan including how the facility will be managed and maintained, maintaining the safety and security of shelter guests as well as neighbors, and the financial operations of the shelter. 12. In the event that any operating support funding levels will be reduced, the Agency shall inform ARCH Staff about the impacts the proposed reduction will have on the budget and plan for services to clients, and what steps shall be taken to address the impacts. A new budget or services plan rnust be approved by ARCH. 2. REDI fRegional Equitable -Devela ruent Initiative) and p Funding Request: $500,000 (Deferred Loan) Unknown number of affordable units CAB Recommendation: $500,000 (Deferred Loan) See attached Funding Chart for distribution ot'City Funds Project SuMMar y This application is for $500,000 in seed funding for capitalizing a $25 million revolving loan fund for the purpose of acquiring sites within a four -county region. The goal is for the program to be operational in 2015. The proposed mission statement for the fund is: "to prornote equitable transit communities throughout the central Puget Sound region through strategic property acquisition lending that supports the development and preservation of housing and community facilities that meet the needs of low-income households and are located within walking distance of high -capacity transit services and stations," ,RCH's funding combined with several other public fonder s (King County, Seattle, State Department of Transportation) is intended to then leverage funds from foundations and lenders. The three funding tiers are: N 0 $5 million in first tier seed money from public sources; EXHIBIT A { $ .5 million second tier from foundations and mission driven investors; $12.5 million third tier from banks and community developmentfinancial institutions. The revolving loan is expected to be in place for at lest ten years and when stopped, funds would be returned to investors with private investors being paid first, and principal returned to public funders as k< t' remains. The basic program follows models used in other parts of the country including the Denver Transit Oriented Development Fund, and the Bay Area "fransit Oriented Affordable lousing JOAH) Fund. t, The f~ E I Fund proposal, emerges from the work of the Growing Transit Communities ( TC) t Partnership, a consortium of public, private, and nun -profit stakeholders led by the Puget Sound Regional Council P RC . A framework and draft business plan for this project was developed by Enterprise Community partners and Impact Capital, both of which are Community Development Finance Institutions CI PIs) that are active in the central Puget Sound region. Funding Rationale; The CAB supported the intent of this application for the following reasons: } ,could allow acquisition in areas evolving as supported by transit ahead of escalating property valises • Would leverage si nilicant funding from banks and mission -driven organizations. The k relatively small public investment by ARCIJ would give East ling County developers access to acquisition loans to the order of several million dollars. • The P l l fund will fill the gap in the spectrum of financial products currently available to developers interested in equitable TOD by allowing nixed income projects, providing longer terra` loans for land banking purposes,; and providing larger loans for larger sites and completed properties. • Revolving loan hens potential for lands being made available to several projects its succession, and a return to city if the program is ended. • Moans would be secured by real estate which could be sold at future value should individual projects not move forward, While the CAB supports the intent of the Rlll fund, because it is in its formative stage, it is not as evolved as many other programs. In addition, the program is unique in that it will support a wide range of types of housing with different financing and affordability levels. chile these circumstances provide challenges, it is still recommended to make a'conditioned funding award at this time because of the important intent of the program and it would also allow ARCH members to be involved with the development of the program and better insure that ARCH member interests are accounted for in the program, The conditions clarify program issues that at a minirnurn roust be addressed prior to program implementation and also provide for the ARCH executive Board final review. Potential Conditions; ecial l Revised Conditions: I . The funding commitment shall' continue for nine 9 months from the date of Council approval and shall expire thereafter if all conditions are not satisfied. An extension may be requested to City staff no later than sixty hti days prior to the expiration date. At that titre, the applicant will provide a status report on progress to date, and expected schedule for start of construction and project completion. City staffwill consider an extension only on the basis of documented, meaningful progress in bringing I the prcaject to readiness or completion t a minimum, the applicant will demonstrate that all capital ,,., } EXHIBIT A iy funding has been secured or is lively to be secured within a reasonable period of time. City staff will ;s grant Lip to a 12 month extension. ?. Funds shall be used by the Agency toward seed money for loan fund. f . Completion of an lnterlocal Agreement and Credit Agreement that is reviewed and approved 7{ through the ARCH Executive Board and that at a minimum address. 3 • Program and .reject criteria in ludin : t o Geographic balance for use ofthe 'fund, with goals for sub -regions including least ling u County: o Defined transit oriented neighborhood areas eligible for use of the fund with flexibility over time to account for changes in land use and transit service. o Criteria for eligible borrowers. o Overall'affordability goals for housing cheated through fund. This should allow for different levels of affordability to encourage a range of types of developments and variety of i financing approaches. o Criteria for establishing loan terms (e.g. amount, interest rater, duration) for individual projects. jects. i o Guidelines regarding eligible types of development, with the primary objective being the development of housing that includes affordable housing in stand-alone or mixed use development. Also provisions to help benefit other non -housing uses e.g. community facilities; small businesses as a secondary use in mixed use developments to encourage vibrant urban centers. o Minimum developer contributions and how REDI funds could be blended with other funding sources. o Review/underwriting criteria for evaluating individual sites, including establishing milestones to be able to evaluate appropriate progress on individual sites. Include some level of flexibility in these criteria to be responsive to different market conditions throughout the region. o procedures for disposition or other use of properties that are not able to proceed as proposed.. o Clear direction/policy regarding relocation. ,5 Governance issues including: i, o Committee structure (Oversight and/or loan), membership, frequency of meetings and responsibilities. Address ARCH Representation in governance structure. ti o Process for identifying a fund manager and the roles and responsibilities ofthe fund manager. o Proceduresdprocess tine fund will use to review individual applications and develop funding =z recommendation. I { o The amounts and terms of funds from each investor, including minimum funding levels C needed from each funding tier for program to become operational, o Novi° losses are allocated: jo Process for regular review and evaluation of REDI Fund activity and revisions to fund priorities and structure D 4. Subunit monitoring reports quarterly through completion of the project, and annually thereafter. Subunit a final budget upon project completion. Y r i } { it t r; t, z EXHIBI`i . Funds will be in the form of deferred 0% interest loan with repayment upon closing the loan pool. 3. Parkview Homes Xi 4 Funding Request: $200,800(Secured Grant) iBeds i i CABRecommendation: $200,80 (Secured Grant See attached Funding Chart for distribution of City burns Project Surnrnary: Parlev'iew Services, a Shoreline -(rased non-profit organization which to date has done 158 beds in 53 properties in the region, with this project is proposing to develop two homes in King County. The ARCH application is to help fund one of those homes, a Supportive Living Services lJorne in Bothell or f Kirkland. The other home will be in Federal flay. For the ARCH sphere home they plan to acquire k and remodel a three -bedroom house that will serve three ( low-income individuals with developmental disabilities. A specific home will be identified once all funding is committed. Improvements will include remodeling to meet both Evergreen sustainability° and ADS (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessibility standards, and a monitored lire suppression` system. > Y There currently is no site control. The house to be bought will be remodeled to include accessibility features necessary for the initial tenants and for future tenants. Parkviev will be looking to acquire suitably laid out minimum 1,500 square foot rambler -style houses that can easily be modified for accessibility. Funding Rationale The CRAB supported the intent of this application for the following reasons: Serves neediest develop mental ly disabled residents by relying on referrals from the State DDD for new residents Provides housing for a population (Special Needs housing) that currently is below long terns ARCH, Trust Fund goals Property will have 17 non-resident care provider coverage Acquisitions to be doge near transit and community amenities Developer has long track record with properties in King County and good reputation with funders and Department of Developmental Disabilities Is on the Department of Cornrnerce Trust Fund LEAP (Legislative Evaluation and Accountability Program) list in the special needs set aside f l Potential € editions. E, Standard Conditions: Refer to list of standard conditions found at end of this rne~mo Special / Revised Conditions. { 1. The funding commitment shall continue for sins (b) months from the date of Council approval and shall expire thereafter if all conditions are not satisfied'. An extension may be requested to ARCH c staff no later than suety 60) days prior to the expiration mate. At that time. the applicant will t t r d EXHIBIT sy provide a status report oil progress to date, and expected schedule for start of construction and protect completion. ARCH staff will consider an extension only on the basis of documented, k meaningful progress in bringing the project to readiness or completion. At a minimum, the applicant will demonstrate that all capital funding has been secured or is likely to be secured within a reasonable period of'time. ARCH staff will grant up to a 12 month extension. Ifnecessary a second extension of up to 6 months may be requested by following the same procedures as the first extension, . 6� Funds shall be used by the Agency toward acquisition and closing costs and developer fee. funds may not be used for any other purpose unless ARCH staff, has given written authorization for the f alternate use. 3. Par vieww shall not proceed with searching for a house until all funding commitments have been received. The Agency shall only purchase unoccupied homes or owner occupied homes in order to not trigger local and federal relocation regulations. 4o Prior to acquisition, the Agency shall submit an appraisal by a qualified appraiser, The appraisal shall be equal to or greaterthan the purchase price. . IfC DBG is a funding source, site control cannot be entered into until the completion of the HUD required Environmental Assessment. 'Cho option agreement shall contain language that addresses federal Rinds' "choice -limiting" restrictions. t Ca. t Funds will be in the fears of secured grant with no repayment, so long as affordabilityand target population is maintained, and the service/care providers have a contract with DDD for funds l necessary to provide services to this population. z 7. i A covenant is recorded ensuring affordability for at least 50 years„ with three beds for developmentally disabled individuals at or below 30% of area median income at move in. 8. Unless othervwrse approved by ARCH staff the development budget for the ARCH sphere house l shall include: The development budget will include a minimum of $3,000 of private sources provided by the z applicant. 467, 00 combined for acquisition and construction costa In the event that total acquisition and c rehab costs; including contingency, exceeds this amount, additional costs shall be covered by private sources from the applicant. • Developer fee shall not exceed $55,000. Replacement Deserves will be funded out of operations at $1,500 for the first year with an annual increase of 3. % per year for replacement reserves and 00 for the first year with an annual increase of 3. % per year for operating reserves. �t i ltl. Residents referred from DDD will not reserve Section 8 assistance. x s< s y ss Y i EXHIBIT A 11. All cash flow after payment of operating expenses shall be placed into a project reserve account that t can be used by the applicant for project related operating, maintenance or services expenses. Any other use of these reserves funds must be approved by ARCH staff. 3 { 12. In the event that any operating support funding levels will be reduced, the Agency shall inform AACf1 Staffabout the impacts the proposed reduction will have on the budget and plan for services to the DD clients, and what steps shall be taken to address the impacts. A new budget or services i plan must be approved by All„1r Parkview must find other sources to make up shortfall, 13, The Agency will notify ARCH when they£ enter into an option or purchase and sate agreement for { any home, providing information on the location of the home and terms for acquiring the home. No home considered for acquisition will be within two blocks of another home owned by Agencyx; unless otherwise approved by ARCH staff; The option and purchase and sales agreement shall contain language that addresses federal funds" "choice -]uniting" restrictions. 14, Prior to closing on a home, an individualized outreach plan will be submitted to ARCH staff for review and approval, The outreach plan will include provisions such as. z At time of a mutually accepted purchase and sales agreement, provide written notification to ` neighbors to include Parkview's intention to purchase the house, description ofthe project, and information regarding Parkvie v, property manager and the service provider that will include their t websites and contact names/numbers; At time when the horne is ready to open and after tenants move in, provide invitations to neighbors for an opportunity such as an open house to individually and/or as a group to Meet with Parkview and the service provider regarding the protect. provide contact information for service provider, property manager and Parkv"iew. 1 .Once home is selected the Agency shall include ARCH Stag` in the inspection of the property and development of the final scope of work for the rehab. The final scope of work for the basic E construction budget shall include, at a rnimmum, all work necessary for licensing of the home and c correction of substandard health and safety conditions. Prior to start of construction, the Agency shall submit the final scope ofworkfor ARCH Staff approval, along with evidence that construction costs f have been confirmed by a qualified contractor and are within the basic construction budget. All uses of construction contingency funds must be approved by ARCH staff prior to authorization to proceed 1 u with such work. 16. Prior to release of funds, the Agency shall submit to ARCH staff for review acid approval drafts of al documents related to the provision of services to residents and management of the property, including k the Memorandum of Understanding with the service provider, fonts of lease agreement with residents, and services agreement between DDD and the Service Provider. These documents shall at a minimum address; tenant selection procedures through DDD; management procedures to address tenant needs; services provided for or required of tenants-, management and operation of the premises, community and neighbor relations procedures; a summary of ARC H's affordability requirements as well as annual monitoring procedure requirements. The plan shall also detail policies and procedures regarding resident turnover with the express purpose placing new residents in available beds and limiting , vacancies. i f 44 i , y ti i EXHIBIT t StandardConditions: I . The applicant shall provide revised development and operating budgets based upon actual funding commitments, ents, which must be approved by city staff. If the Applicant is unable to adhere to the1 budgets, City or Administering agency must be immediately notified and of new budget(s) shall be Y submitted by the Applicant for the 'ity"s approval. The City shall not unreasonably withhold its approval to (a) revised budgt(s), so long as such new budget(s) does not materially adversely change the Project. This shall be a continuing obligation of the Applicant. failure to adhere to the budgets, either original or as amended may result in withdrawal of the City°'s commitment of Bands, i. The Applicant shall submit evidence of funding commitments from all proposed public sources, In 4 the event commitment of funds identified in the application cannot be secured in the time frame identified in the application, applicant shall immediately notify City or Administering Agency, and describe the actions it will undertake to secure alternative funding and the timing of those actions subject to City or Administering Agency's review and approval, }{ . In the event federal Rinds are used, and to the extent applicable, federal guidelines mustbe met, 4 including but not limited to. contractor solicitation, bidding and selection; wage rates, and z Endangered Species ,act E requirements. C DBG funds may not be used to repay (bridge) acquisition finance costs.. s 4. The Applicant shall maintain documentation of any necessary land use approvals and permits required; by the city where the projects are located. r . Submit monitoring reports quarterly through completion of the project, and annually thereafter. Submit a final budget upon project completion If applicable, submit initial tenant information as required by City or Administering Agency. i I; ;y If i r k i t f r, 5 it ,t R 4 t" c g v L t t fi i EXHIBIT A3 .RGII ROUSING 'TRUST FUND (I TT) APPLICATIONSf 014 Funds Requested Rousing Project Duration Total cost H7 protect h Income (Groot/Loon) ! Type/ Location of Benefit per unit cost per completion Applicant Recommendation served affordable unit of units,/ rms 1 ARCH $500,000 Acquisition of Will ^+tray 3 County area 30 years or Unknown Unknown S[ D[ Fund Loan properties from 30%;10 more t Tof) Land suitable for rn arket rate Sates trr be presumed Banking) development as detern-a€aed affordable housing C'e'-'�ra[glvts W€BSiYl C7itttGbYM F 1 T BD targets, including ARCH Where d' CC[b'yMVt#.Yt0.t 1Ct7hl. $7tFt,000 Rehab or New 30 beds,et .�wRCH Sphere 50 Years Sta3,tafatT"bed S 1 T,000 Nov "i't[ t Con rc turns fair Secured (grant Construction 3(t% ofIntluence 1 the ibrneless 3tt Homeless a ,a e a a o � fr tore ParkviovSerwrces S200800 1, tame for 3 3M" ofInflasence e- 50 Years $184836 ;$0h,933 Fall 2015 TtD florne Secured orant Deae[o[trnentrr3�3 t:rrklandr`T odiell 1 Dilbled l Site to be determined 3 i t ti t t r rt r t t s t rr, y 1 a t r t i ,r i t A EXHIBIT A 2014 HOUSING TRUST FUND; PROPOSED FUNDING SCOURCES l; EXECUTIVE BOARD 12/11114 s PROJECT t } i CFH f KCHA REDI P"arkviewv € i SOURCE Winter Shelter _ Land Fund CC Horne TOTAL. Request 700,000 $ 500,000 200,800 1,400,800 CAR Recommendation 700,000 500,000 200,800 8 1,400,800 2 i Current Funding Sub -Regional CGI G Bellevue C General Fund 3 i 383,500 250,000 $ 55,000 689,400 1 Issaquah a General Fund i 20,000 36,500 5,201 $ 61,791 Kirkland General Fund 160,000 120„000 - 280,000 COBG 80,12 800152 Mercer is General Fund €1 7,000 $ 11,500 1,500 $ 20,000 Redmond General Fund 50,000 $ 50,000 100,000 1 CCC% 47,232 47,232 Newcastle General Fund 7,800 700 8,500 Kenmore General Funny 20,000 25,000 4,285 40,285 General Fund 4,000 5 7,000 1,500 6 12,500 k S ammamish i General Fund $ 18,000 $ 1,600 10,600 2 l Clyde Hill General Fund 13,800 1,200 5 15,000 Medina t General Fund $ 11,300 1,040 $ 12,340 Yerrurrr Paint .,€ 7 General Fund 2,300 $ 200 2,500 Hunts Point l General Fund 2,300 $ 200 $ 2,500 {. TOTAL $ 700,000 $ 500,000 200,800 $ 1,400,800 4 S CDBG 127,384 127,384 General Fund 700„000 $ 500,000 $ 73,416 1,273,41 t I I { �t s ti k. y t 4 1 t b2 y to slly f; EXHIBIT 's ARCH HOUSING TRUST FUND, 2014 Leveraging Funds - - ARCH KC HApMC;urrgregoiioor; _Parkvieaw Sexiees RE01 Food E KC Perms Wimer Shelter ARCH S there Mme TCF"1`AL Ptvnr ARCH C'.enrmiament " _. - SO 3 Cwtesa r P01 Request $.$tg5.Mlo S700,O00 S200,8N) SI,+9W,900 ' `"...,yyy� » s, +. ,.,. .r .,t.a } t' .��. � � ..r ea .a.. . a�'. �� � � < °.. .. '�.` King County Print KC Cmiimitmerg H(dki07Md;,CDBCi iih UDr 517$..0 sl'17S,309 aiasprZ6i�3 St1 G'e4eaan 'ilkiranan Smims S6s Other �S1;tO)AX) 3 .ug,opCl,wo ' 2�%i2 ��2ymmY,tJm i' g wg i`6or WA R_"etaimur€en1 -. - �... SO tt WA HAP SO l WAHTF SO s .. i(XV0) S675,400 $1,074,400 %VA Uri (Equity kuun46 $t1 4A FitC Wapshina on Works So a. f FcderaV [kJ[t ' So d section 81 so McKim - V) C3iisees MobihjCram) S 2,5GX3,(Xk) S2.SfK,iiS :., thV;*•�`a^�ti,t.tt<"`tk �`�t2.,lti.., �.UY, , - , t, txi^;:�, > . , �' s 'tat C"redita _ 0% Prior Tax Credit Z"*;ettitntertt N m 4+116Other 3 'i eta Mor i t a Funk Loos — S U,SdS)'000 R N CR p 09% r S17,500,000 s Mlerred aaedteiu er h'ee _ _ a L ... SG l Prirwie S7,500,000 3y% S69n7,(X)U 191% $3, ) _ 1% $ ,103„(3()C Other {C31rgr%ealflHei SI'mr,ilw .C% irm r Si'o"I,Ci o f :... v1.CW i'3 k,;.{. ... ,JU y u 6 2 u y yy� l n i 4 t t i o. h EXHIBIT ECONOMIC SUMMARY: EKC Men's Permanent Winter Shelter 1 1. Applicant/ escri tion: Congregations for the Hor less/K 1 Development of shelter to serve a minimum of 50 homeless men„ plus servo; as day center 2. Project Location: tion: R I Sphere of Influence f . Financina Information Funding Source Funding Amount Commitment ARCH $700,000 Applied for Fall 2014 Ding County $1,000,000 Applied for Interim Fall 2014 Applying for Permanent in Fall 2015 l 4 Commerce Trust Fund $900,000 Applying in Fall 2015 3 Capital campaign $600,000 Committed TOTAL $3,200,000 { 4. Conceptual t2velo rent Bud et: l ITEM TOTAL. PER BED HTF Acquisition $1,337,000 $26,740 $680,000 Relocation 20000$20,000 Construction $1,556,600 $31,132 Design $52,000 $1,040 l Development Consultant $50,000 $1,000 Other consultants 14,000 280 Permits/Fees/Hookups $8 ,200 $1,664 Finance coasts $48,000 $960 C Reserves $25,000 $500 Other development coasts" ' 14,2 0 284 I *Insurance, Bidding, Development Period Utilities and Accounting z z i 5. Debt Service Coverage; Secured grant, no repayment if in compliance, z< i, 5 eurity for Qily Funds: • A recorded covenant to ensure affordability and use for targeted population for 50 years. A promissory note secured by a steed of trust. The promissory note will require repayment of the grant it amount upon non-compliance with any of the funding conditions. 1 7, Rental Subsidy: None r. } s 7 .v F t ti• 1 `i EXHIBIT ECONOMIC SUMMARY: PARKVIEW XI 1. Applicant/Description.= Parkview Services / Acqusition and remodeling of home to serve 3 persons living with developmental disabilities 2, Project Location: Bothell/Kirkland area 3. Financina Information. Funding i Source Funding Amount Commitment ARCH $200,800 Applied for Fall 2014 King County $175,308 Applied for Fall 2014 Commerce Trust Fund $175,400 Applied for Fall 2014 Owner Equity $3,000 Committed "TOTAL. 554,508 4. Develo ment Bud et ITEM TOTAL PER BED MTF Acquisition $412,000 $137,333 $180,800 Construction $57,500 $19,167 Design $16,000 $5,333 Consultants $2,950 $083 Cteveloper fee $55,000 $18,333 $20,000 Finance costs $3,508 $1,169 Reserves $3,000 $1,000 Other development costs* $4,550 $1,517 TOTAL. $554,508 184,836 $200„800 * Development Period Utilities, Insurance, Accounting 5. Qebt Service Covera . Secured grant, no repayment of in compliance. 6. Security for Cit Funds, A recorded covenant to ensure affordability and use for targeted population for 50 years, A promissory mate secured by a deed of trust, The promissory mote will require repayment of the grant amount upon non-compliance with any of the funding conditions. 7. Rental Subsidy. bond 4 EXHIBIT A FIGURE ARCH: EAST KING COUNTY TRUST FUND SUMMARY LIST OF CONTRACTED PROJECTS FUNDED (1993 --Spring 2014) Undtsf ed PototTotat Distribution project Location Owner Funding Allocation Target 1. F mId Hot stn Andrews Heights Apartments Bellevue Imagine Housing 24 $400,000 Garden Grave Apartments Bellevue DASH 18 $180,000 Overtake Townhomes Bellevue Habitat of EKC t D $120=0 Glendakt Apartments Bellevue DASH 82 $300,000 Wildwood Apartments Bellevue CASH 36 $270,000 Somerset Cardents (Kona) Bellevue KC housing Authority 198 $700ittt0 Pacific lien Bellevue Pacific Inn Assoc 118 $800,000 Eastwood Square Bellevue Park Vila LLC 48 $600.0 Chalet Apts Be➢devue Imagine blousing 14 3163,333 Andrews Glen Bellevue Imagine Housing 1t1Ill $387,500 Bellevue Apartments Bellevue „. LIHI — 45 $8W000 YWCA Family Apartments K.0 (Bellevue Sphere) YWCA 12 $100.0 0 Highland Gardens (Kdahariie) K C. (Issaquah Sphere) Imagine Housing 54 $291,281 Cresthrie Apartments K.C. (Kirkland Sphere) Shelter Resources 22 $196,000 Parkway Apartments Redmond KC Housing Authority 41 $100,000 Habitat • Patterson Redmond Habitat of EKC '" 24 $446„629 Avon Villa Mobile Home Park Redmond MHCP ." 93 $525,80 Terrace Hilds Redmond - Imagine Housing 18 $442,000 Village at Overtake Station Redmond •° KG Housing Authority 308 $1 645,37 Surnmervisrod Redmond DASH 166 $1,187,265 Coal Creek Terrace Newcastle "" Habitat of EKC ' 12 $240,837 RoseCrest (Talus) Issaquah imagine Housing " 40 $918,846 Mine Hdl Issaquah Imagine Housing 28 $450DOO Clark Street Issaquah Imagine Housing 36 $365,000 Lauren Heights (Iss Highlands) Issaquah Imagine Housing/SRI "" 45 $657,343' Habitat Issaquah Highlands Issaquah *" Habitat of EKC "" 10 $318,914" Issaquah Family Village I Issaquah '* YWCA— 87 $4,382,584: is quail Family Village 11 Issaquah YWCA 47 $2„760,Ooo Greenbrier Faanlly Apts Woodinville "' DASH "" 50 $286,892 Plum Court Kirkland DASH 61 166 $1,000,000 Francis Village; Kirkland Imagine Housing 15 $375,000 South Kirkland Park n Rine Kirkland Imagine Housing 45 $901,395 Copper Larrtent IKenmore LIHI - 33 $452,321 Habitat Sammamish Sammannist " * • Habitat of KC <" 10 $853,000 Homeowner Downpayment, Loan Various KC,rVVSHFCIARCH 87 est $615,000 SUB -TOTAL 1,942 $ 4,020, 16 51 ,5% (56%) I Senior Houstnil Cambridge Court Bellevue Resurrection Housing 20 $160,000 Ashwood Court Bellevue DASHrShelter Resources *'' so 1.070, Evergreen Court (Assisted Living) -Bellevue DASHSholler Resources 64 184 $2,480, Bellevue Manor I Harris Manor Bellevue I Redmond KC Housing Authority 105 $1,334,749 Vasa Creek K.C, (Bellevue Sphere} Shelter Resource$ so $190,000 Riverside Landing Bothe➢I Shaker Resources so $225,000' Kirkland Plana Kirkland Imagine Housing 24 $610,000 Totem Lake Phase 2 Kirkland ",M Imagine Housing '« 8C $736„842 Herein Landing" Kenmore DASHJSheiser Resources 50 $65,000 Eltswodh House Apts Mercer Island Imagine Housing 59 .Q 0 Providence Senior Housing Redmond Providence — 74 $2,239,000 Greenbrier Sr Allis Woodinville "" QASHIShelter Resources 50 $196,192 SUB -TOTAL 676 $10,206,783 23.214 (19%) 8 EXHIBIT;A FIGURE 1 ARCH: EAST KING COUNTY TRUST FUND SUMMARY z LIST OF CONTRACTED PROJECTS FUNDED (1993 - Spring 2 44) 3 UnItalseal Pet of Total Distribution Project Location Owner 6; Funding Allocation Target 1 a 3„ ftornelessFfiransitldr��l Haausin#t i x l Hopeknk Place Bellevue _ "' Hopelink 20 $500 Chalet Bellevue Imagine Housing A $46,667 Kensington Square Bellevue; Housing at Crossroads 6 $250,000 Andrew's Glen Bellevue; Imagine Housing 30 $1,162,500. Bellevue Apartments Bellevue «.«d LIHII - 12 $200,000 Sophia Place Bellevue Sophia Way 20 $M,0001 Dixie Price Transitional Housing Redmond HomAnk d $71,750 z Avondale Pare Redmond Hopallnk (FHA) 18 $280,000 Avondale Park Redevelopment Redmond Hopotnk (ERA) 60 $1,502A69 i Potter Court Kirkland KITH A $100,000 Francis Village Kirkland Imagine Housing 45 $1,125 I' South Kirkland Park n Ride Kirkland **` Imagine Housing 12 $225 3A9 Totem lake Phase 2 Kirkland Imagine Housing 15 $138 158 Rose Crest (Takrs) Issaquah Imagine Housing W. 10 $229,712 < Lauren Heights piss Highlands) Issaquah $RI "« $ $73,038 Issaquah Fam4 Village l Issaquah YWCA "® 10 $503,74 t , SUB -TOTAL 267 $6,658,387 15.1% (13 ) A. Bgeclal Needs Heusin i My Friends Place K C BDVP 6 Beds $65 DOO Sillwater Redmond Bastside Mental Health 19 Beds $187 787 Foster Care Home Kirkland Friends of Youth A Beds $35,000 I FOY New Ground Kirkland Friends of Youth 6 Emits $250,000 DD Group House 7 Kirkland Community Living 5 Beds $100,000 } Youth Haven Kirkland Friends of Youth 10 Beds $332,133 i FOY T'ransillonal Housing Kirkland Friends of Youth " 10 Beds $252,624 FOY Extended Foster Cast Kirkland * Friends of Youth — 18 Beds $112 62 d DD Group Home A Redmond Community Living 5 Beds $111,261 DD Croup Haines 5 & 6 Redmond/KC (Bothell") Community Living 10 Beds $250,D00 United Cerebral Palsy BelievuelRe arond t1CP 9 Beds $25,000 DD Group Hume Bellevue Residence Fast 5 Beds $40,000 AIDS Housing, BeilevueJKirkiand AIDS Housing of WA 10 Units $130,000 t Harrington House Bellevue AHAJCCS 8 Beds $290,209 DU Croup Home 3 Bellevue Community Living 5 beds $21,000 i Pa)kview DD Condos Ili Bel vue Parkiriew A $200,00 t= ERR DD Home Issaquah IFRR 6 Beds $50,209 FFC DD Homes NE KC FFC' 8 Beds $300,000 Oxford House Bothell Oxford/Compass Ctr 8 Beds $80,000 Parkview DD Homes VI Bothell'Believue Parkview 6 Beds $160,000 FFC DD Home it TBD FFC A Beds $168,737 t l SUD-TOTAL 18 SedislUnIts $3,151,587 2a7r tt2°raj t TOTAL 3,633 $44,037,270 100A S{ 1 Funded through Bellevue Downtown Program 10% ,Also, includes in -kind contributions (e.g land, fee waivers, infrastructure improvements) (€ • * Amount at Fee Waiver still to be finalized l �I r x } i t } k , i i 3