Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 203RESOLUTION NO..?03 A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Medina, of King County, Washington accepting grant funds to implement the Growth Management Act of 1990. WHEREAS, the 1990 Washington State Legislature passed an Act dealing with Growth Management (HB 2929) which requires all jurisdictions in King County to prepare comprehensive plans consistent with new guidelines; and - WHEREAS, the Act requires that jurisdictions prepare these plans in cooperation with their neighbors and with King County; and WHEREAS, the Act assigns near term deadlines for the completion of 1) an inventory and regulations for the protection of resource lands and critical areas, 2) a process to identify an urban growth area, and 3) an assessment of land use data collection needs; and - WHEREAS, the Legislature appropriated $7.4 million dollars for each year of the 1989-1991 biennium to assist the Department of Community Development and local governments to comply with and implement the Act; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development will provide approximately $2.1 million dollars to a consortium of general purpose governments in King County provided that 80% of those governments representing 75% of the county's population agree to the grant distribution formula and to jointly develop and cooperatively implement a work program; and WHEREAS, a technical committee of representatives from City of Seattle, King County and Suburban Cities have prepared a draft work program (attachment A), and a grant distribution formula (Attachment B); NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. To be eligible for a share of the Growth Management Act grant funds, the City agrees to: a) designate the King County Planning Directors as the group which will manage the completion of the workprogram, receive regular briefings on the activities and progress of the technical forums, and coordinate preparation of the annual reports to the State Department of Community Development (Attachment C). b) send a representatives to and actively participate in a technical forums to accomplish the work program (Attachment A), specifically, the inventory and protection of resources and critical areas, the designation of an urban growth area, and creation of a countywide data sharing group. c) the grant distribution formula (Attachment B), which is that every general purpose government in King County will receive a base amount of $35,000 plus a per capita allocation based on the jurisdiction's proportional share of total county population. d) designation of King County as the jurisdiction that will accept the grant funds from the Department of Community Development and disburse and administer those funds consistent with the provisions of this resolution including attachments. e) submit a short written descriptions of a high priority project which is unique to this City and upon which the jurisdiction intends to begin work in this funding year (September 1, 1990 to duly 1, 1991). f) complete the Growth Management Needs Assessment and return it to the State Department of Community Development by January 1, 1991, with a copy to the King County Planning Division. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1990. Dean Messmer, Mayor h��rga et Davis, City Clerk LKENT "A" .2ROGRAM RESOURCE AND CRITICAL LANDS TECHNICAL FORUM BACKGROUND: SHB 2929 requires that King County, and each city within King County, designate natural resource lands and critical areas within their respective jurisdictions. The County and each city must then adopt development regulations to asaure the conservation of resource lands, and to preclude land uses or development that is compatible kith critical areas. These actions must be completed by September 1, 1991. OBJECTIVE: To facilitate and coordinate the designation and regulation of natural resource lands and critical areas by King County and each city within King County, as required by Sections 6 and 17, SHB 2929. ACTION'S: King County and the cities of King County will establish and participate in a Resource and Critical Lands Technical Forum charged with carrying out this objective. The Technical Forum will undertake the following activities: 1. Seek consensus on a common or compatible approach to the criteria for designation and regulation of both natural resource lands and critical areas, 2. Coordinate designation, mapping and other issues relating to the political boundaries between jurisdictions. 3. Exchange ideas, experience and expertise relating to the designation and regulation of natural resource lands and critical areas. 4. Explore the joint use of consultants, data and other resources among jurisdictioria. r 5. Coordinate with the designation and regulation efforts of Snohomish and Pierce Counties. 6. Periodically brief elected officials through established intergovernmental forums, PRODUCT- A coordinated and compatible System of natural resource lands and critical area regulation throughout King County by September 1, 1991, URBANROWTH AREAS DESIGNATION BACKGROUND: SHB 2929 requires that by July 1, 1991, King County begin consulting with each city regarding the location of an Urban Growth Area, Urban Growth Areas must include areas and densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is projected to occur in King County over a twenty year Period- Due to the complexity of urban growth issues, ongoing planning efforts and other considerations, it is imperative that the County and cities begin work on growth areas immediately. A cooperative effort will ensure that the legitimate interests of all jurisdictions are considered in the ultimate designations. OBJECTIvE: To foster inter -jurisdictional cooperation and provide an accurate information base upon which King County Urban Growth Area decisions will be made. &C-IONS'The urban/rural boundary of the King County Comprehensive Plan, together with the land use, development and urban service policies of the County sad cities, will provide the basis upon which Urban Growth Area decisions will be made. The first step toward making these decisions will be to determine the growth capacity of the county and cities, based on existing plans and policies and on criteria established for Urban Growth Areas, King County and the cities of King County will: 1. Establish and participate in an Urban Growth Area Technical Forum, which will seek consensus on criteria, methodologies and format to be used by the County and each city to estimate their population and employment growth capacities. 2. Each city and the County will estimate their own capacities for population and employment growth, based upon local plans and policies and consistent with agreed to criteria, methodologies and format. 3. The Urban Growth Area Technical Forum will compile the capacity estimates prepared by King County jurisdictions. 4. As a second priority, the Urban Growth Area Technical Forum Will take Initial steps toward delineation of future annexation areas. This effort will be undertaken in light of SHB 2929's recognition that cities are the appropriate providers of urban government services. Initial steps will include: a. Seeking consensus on criteria to guide decisions on the future boundaries of King County's cities. b. Identifying and mapping arced -to future boundaries and areas where there is not agreement. c. Identifying key elements of a process for achieving agreement on future city boundaries. PRODUCTS: 1. Estimate of countywide population and employment growth capacity, based on existing plans and policies by September 1, 1991. 2. process for delineating and agreeing to future city boundaries by September 1, 1991. 3. Map(s) identifying agreed -to future boundaries and highlighting areas where there is not agreement. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DATA SHARING GROUP BACKGROUND: Successful implementation of SHB 2929 will depend upon a high Tavel of cooperation and coordination among local jurisdictions. Such coordination is currently hampered by a lack of comparable land use and development data from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. OBJECTIVE: To share land use and development data and work toward common methods of compiling and reporting information. ACTIVITIES: First year activities will involve consultation between the cities and the County on standardization of references. PRODUCTS: A "first cut" at on countywide development capacity by September 1, 1991 (to be coordinated with efforts under the "Urban Growth Area Designation" element of this work program.) WORK PROGRAMS FOR INDIVIDUAL KING COUNTY JURISDICTIONS , (Each adopting jurisdiction to provide paragraph describing planned activities. ) ATTACHMENT "V? GOVERNMENTAL FRAMEWORK For approximately the past five years, the general purpose governmenta in Bing County have been working more cooperatively to resolve land use and service delivery issues. The Solid Waste Interlocal Forum and the Eastside Transportation Forum are two examples of effective regional problem solving groups in this area. Building on the success Of these and other groups, the county's general purpose governments have been discussing the creation of a more formal COUNTYW1DE PLANNING COUNCII, "to asaure coordination, consensus, consistency and compliance" among local governments as they implement the Growth Management Act and adopt comprehensive planning Policies to be applied countywide. Decisions on the formation of a countywide planning council slid other strategies for local coordination and cooperation are anticipated during Fall 1990 and Winter 1991, In the interim, the general purpose governments in this county have agreed to designate the King County Planning Directors Association as an appropriate forum for discussing issues, exchanging information, promoting standardization and consistency, encouraging cooperation and providing technical assistance. The directors have been functioning in this capacity for several years with considerable success. The group meets regularly each month, attracts planning directions from City of Seattle, King County, and from most of the suburban cities and small towns in the county. **TOTRL PHGE.013 ** arr1cl11Ir I 610RJ1 IE7161I1M} iC4 IP1DI16 tutvll iPID3 aYd:ldiLI ;1,fH,Hi III; Mill DOI IMAM 191DI16 IICIO111 1110ciliol CODIII 101DaDT (5 C0D1lISS1 I13T3,i11J (;7S,10frpefetet} j2,1lf,612 Il64e,li@� I0101 AV11111LI SO AIOIOIB lilt 101➢LIlIOI 1,482,100 41716,110 stilt topCLilICA 16,426,l00 IIAtill Of IECIOIIL lonalIol 39,111 3,715,68@ ta1P11}IOA of fil 11 AICIDxl C31118 31 MITI lilt 14. ST1 TOTE; EdEt A80711 18 In Oil PLAEIIA/C011P1S1I! t0I ORE TI1R................................................... .........--^..---•...................I......................._ .......-------- 011 ?It CIPIIA lilt lilt ➢I11111PTI01 2PAts..',1at lOtuLA!I01 tOPPLAlIOI POletlCtll CIaIJtlT1R1 Jul list; 0I r,n "OUST i of ARM tOtAL A16011 A➢IVIA 1461 1,720 1.121 1T.2!1 1 In 001 IEIOI Axis IM ? 321 31,151 2.}1t 19,271 133,111 a1L11VP1 73903 2}4 title f,/2t S.944 11,37i 21.244 l3S,IH MCI DIIL'OID 10l1t1L (tARi} ", 1174 1,534 1.18E Il.44t 33111" 13a,l11 CAAIITIOA 7547 9S1 11,100 1,211 1,781 44.781 13 `,I4f ClM TILL 3221 3111 /1081 4,211 31,071 •4.301 i3.,1H D38 Aa7tiS DOYALL 131E 15,190 1.14t 111.951 135 ,11/ i3S,IH IIPICIAR 729 5427 21135 $1391 0,10 1,431 231.021 lID IL RA! 63,)14 1,3 11 17,741 14.37% 135,161 BDIlS 10I1f I354QOA9 433 144 1.031 4,SSt ;35,H/ ;35,Nt lilt Ms 7,310 I' M 33.411 135,141 111C COPITI 22911 Rim 31,44E 514,134 2.124 34,721 43,061 1.111 i3S,lle 1111111D lilt I0113! Fill 18771 37,100 2.341 Ifo,161 13S,If1 i35,{H IIDIIA 2485 2a@0 t,ll1 33,6Bt i?3,IH AIRCIA IBLAAO 3214 21522 2,If1 20,63E e,211 1.191 -1,471 13S,IH 111101 pII!) ", 23 161 1441 •4.10 155,171 135,111 10MID! Pitt 426E 101 , 1{S4 55,111 14,449 ROtlA IIRD 171, 2,420 0.161 42,271 ;?S,fN PICII:C AIDIOID 2261 4,111 1.281 81.431 WIM 13S,H0 111101 23314 306I2 35,421 39,Su 2.191 Sl,lOt ;33,Hf IEAIAC SIAITI6 2440E 2.is1 1.121 23.311 14,371 13S,H1 82TIOIISI 493846 311,101 33.141 1411 ;33,H1 i3S,1H 810QPALIII 2Is 1311 243 1,141 I'M 4.Itt 16.271 12,711 r0I1211 IAARPY 10I1T lira 10,121 /.731 211,4fi 131,144 813,1H 1677 !aS 1.731 •a,S41 133,P11 32 1.492,001 1011111 AAD ULNA SIDI AtCIIY; A 110t01II01Att 8,Ali 0l Tit )A61 AAODII %m Mj!'G An., t9 Ot J,t t1LRM4 Moo tC 11 11t 11,212 336,21} ;25,369 ;61,31! d2I9 135,211 ;b6,18i t111,1as 81,113 136,123 16,35/ ;42,616 ;933 3S 933 12217 331 2! 111:516 j16,Slfi SI,814 ;36,a1@ (1,751 139,151 1t7,SiS b S6S i31S S3S,313 j5,194 j10,{}4 f21,135 ;d2,13S 13a2,731 j41T,7S0 ;ta,e21 ;63,12a 32,182 p,23171 12,201 111 337 1426 84,469 1022 139,922 11,197 13 m) $3,013 $31,933 126,333 161,333 121,247 364,247 $11,813 112,143 1313,1if l418,069 ;1a1 83i,111 ;1,349 136,149 1I,144 /3 044 732 ;35,132 i1,e11,31S 11,102,377 12,194,fi92