Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 245CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 245 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FUND EXCHANGE BETWEEN THE CITY OF MEDINA AND KING COUNTY. WHEREAS, the King County Project Evaluation Committee allocation of 1996-98 Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds results in a level of STP funding for the City of Medina that is difficult'to apply for and administer for the City's street projects; and WHEREAS, King County could make effective use of additional federal STP preservation funds and has determined it is in the public interest to expedite transportation system improvements, however small, in all jurisdictions in King County; and WHEREAS, the Medina City Council has determined that the City's best interests are served through this exchange of funds, which will result in the City exchanging its $75,554 allocation of 1996-98 STP funds for an equal amount of King County Road Fund monies; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina, Washington, that: Section 1. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the City the Interlocal Agreement for Surface Transportation Program (STP) Fund Exchange with King County in substantially the same form as attached hereto. PASSED, BY HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON ON THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 1997 AND SIGNED IN AUTHENTICATION OF ITS PASSAGE THE 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1997. 'L61 V, Teo Susan Potts, Mayor Pro Tern Approved as to form; 'Kirk R. Wines, City Attorney 7 Attest: lxPu71y Harwood T—E� City Clerk jw� i X.Fjao f �Ii✓N/6,fx) Res. No. 245 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) FUND EXCHANGE An interlocal agreement between King County (the "County') and the City / Town of ("the City"), hereinafter jointly referred to as Parties," for the purpose of exchanging federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds and King County Road Fund monies to facilitate transportation preservation improvements in King County. WHEREAS, the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) has approved the distribution of the federal fiscal year (FFY) 1996-98 Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds in an amount outlined in the attached Figure 1, and WHEREAS, the King County Project Evaluation Committee (King PEC) has been recognized by the PSRC, to represent local governments in King County on matters concerning the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) funds, which includes STP funds, and WHEREAS, the King PEC is required to submit a list of King County's STP preservation projects and its STP fund allocations to the Transportation Policy Board of the Puget Sound Regional Council, and WHEREAS, the King PEC allocation results in a level of STP funding for some small agencies that is not adequate or fiscally feasible to support a federal -aid project within the procedural requirements set by the Federal Highway Administration, and ' IN=REAS, some of the small cities desire to exchange STP funds with King County Road Fund monies in order to make transportation preservation improvements in their jurisdictions that would not qualify as federal -aid highway projects, and WIIREAS, King County could make effective use of additional federal STP preservation funds, and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to expedite transportation system improvements, however small, in all jurisdictions in King County; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of covenants, conditions, performances and promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: _9- SECTION 1. PURPOSE The purposes of this agreement are: A. To ensure coordination and cooperation between King County and the City in making necessary transportation system improvements, however small. B. To establish a process by which the City can exchange FFY 1996-98 STP funds for King County Road Fund monies to expedite transportation improvements and federal fund obligations. SECTION 2. KING COUNTY FFY 1994-98 STP FUND ALLOCATION The allocation of Unincorporated King County's and small cities' STP funding was approved by the PSRC on September 28, 1995, as shown on the attached Figure 1. A. Each city's share is established and distributed based upon an agency's critical need for road preservation based on a Pavement Management System or, in the absence of a Pavement Management System, professional judgment. B. Each agency's allocation of STP funding, unless it is transferred to another agency by an agreement, must be designated to support proposed transportation preservation improvement project(s), subject to approval by the King PEC and the Puget Sound Regional Council's Transportation Policy Board (TPB). SECTION 3. FFY 1996 - 98 STP FUND EXCHANGE WITH KING COUNTY In order to assist and expedite transportation system improvements, however small, in all jurisdictions in King County, the County may exchange its Road Fund monies for the City's federal fiscal year 1996, 1997, and 1998 STP fund allocation. A. EXCHANGE FUND USAGE The King County Road Fund monies transferred to the City must be used for transportation system improvements as described in the City's Six Year Transportation Improvement Program. 2. The County must use all STP funds pursuant to the STP provisions of ISTEA and in accordance with the issue paper developed jointly between King County and the Puget Sound Regional Council, "A Technical Approach to Programming and Assuring Multiyear Roadway Preservation in King County Areas," dated September 1995. 3. The King County Project Evaluation Committee (King PEC) will have final authorization for the use of preservation funds or in determining the eligibility of projects. -3- SECTION 4. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES A. The City shall transmit to the King County Department of Transportation a Street Improvement Program, including the project(s) to be improved with King County Road Fund monies, the cost of the project(s) and expected completion dates within two months of the execution of this agreement. B. On receipt of King County Road Fund monies, the City shall not divert local funds normally used for transportation purposes, as the King County Road Fund monies are meant to be supplemental to existing transportation funding. SECTION 5. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES A. In accordance with Section 3 of this Agreement, the County shall remit to the City County Road Fund monies equal in amount to the City's STP allocation that has been obligated by the County toward eligible preservation projects, provided that: 1. The County has received the City's Street Improvement Program in accordance with Section 4 of this Agreement, and 2. King County has previously obligated its own STP preservation funds and has obligated the STP preservation funds from the City to eligible preservation projects. B. King County could be unable to obligate all of the STP funds for all of the small cities that have entered into Interlocal Agreements for Fund Exchange with the County due to the region's current Fiscal Year obligation authority having been reached or other factors. In that case, King County will remit to each small city that has entered into such Interlocal Agreement that small city's Road Fund monies due under the Interlocal Agreement, in the following order. The County will make the remittances in the order in which the Interlocal Agreements were received by the County, with full payment being made to the first small city before any payment is made to the second small city, and so on, until the total amount of small city STP funds obligated by the County has been reached. C. King County will forward an executed copy of this Interlocal Agreement to the PSRC and ensure the City's STP funds are transferred to King County for subsequent project obligation. SECTION 6. KING COUNTY PROJECT EVALUATION COMMITTEE In order to enhance transportation planning and programming of improvements in King County, the County and the City shall coordinate this agreement with the King County Project Evaluation Committee and the PSRC. -4- SECTION 7. AMENDMENTS AND TERMINATION Either party may propose amendments to this agreement at any time. Both parties shall negotiate the proposed amendments and shall reach resolution within 90 days. In the event that resolution is not reached within 90 days, the agreement shall automatically expire. Either party shall have the right to terminate this agreement at any time with or without cause by giving ninety (90) days written notice of its intention to terminate. SECTION 8. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS Both the County and the City shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations, anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding. IN WITNESS WBEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the date last written below. KING COUNTY King County Executive Approved as to Form King County Prosecuting Attorney in0ocal 2/27197 CITY / TOWN OF Date Mayor Date Approved as to Form City / Town Attorney 5- Figure 1 KING COUNTY PRESERVATION FUNDS (VKING-2) King County Small Cities / Towns Federal funds by Agency Programmed for 1996-1998 1996 1997 1998 Algona $21,000 $24,690 $24,690 $70,380 Beaux Arts Village $2,000 $1,343 $1,343 $4,686 Bothell $44,000 $50,420 $50,420 $144,840 Clyde Hill $16,000 $13,515 $13,515 $43,030 Des Moines $47,000 $44,702 $44,702 $136,404 Enumclaw $0 $50,420 $50,420 $100,840 Hunts Point $5,000 $4,808 $4,808 $14,616 Issaquah $36,063 $67,920 $67,920 $171,903 Lake Forest Park $19,000 $27,159 $27,159 $73,318 Medina $26,000 $24,777 $24,777 $75,554 Milton $7,000 $2,599 $2,599 $12,198 Newcastle $0 $35,693 $35,693 $71,186 Normandy Park $48,000 $35,866 $35,866 $119,732 Pacific $19,000 $28,935 $28,935 $76,870 Yarrow Point $5,000 $5,241 $5,241 $15,482 TOTAL $295,063 $418,088 $418,088 $1,131,239 Unincorporated King County $1,087,974 $1,329,421 $1,329,421 $4,162,842 intlocal 2/27/97