HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-12-2004 - Agenda PacketMEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
April 12, 2004
501 Evergreen Point Road
A. CALL TO ORDER
7:00 p.m.
Medina, WA
7:00 p.m.
B. ROLL CALL (Adam, Blazey, Nunn, Odermat, Phelps, Rudolph, Vail Spinosa)
C. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
D. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS - None
E. ANNOUNCEMENTS
1. Mayor
2. Council
3. Staff
F. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Minutes from March 8, 2004 Council Meeting
2. Minutes from March 22, 2004 Council Study Session
3. Approval of March 2004 Checks/Finance Officer's Report
4. Adoption of City Council Guidelines Manual
G. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
1. Non -Agenda Items (3 minutes per person)
H. REPORTS
1. Police Department
2. Development Services
3. Public Works Department
4. Park Board
5. Finance Committee
6. Personnel Committee
7. Emergency Preparedness Committee
8. City Manager's Report
I. PUBLIC HEARING - None
J. OTHER BUSINESS
1. Discussion of Boarding House Regulations
2. Discussion of Intersection Sight Distance Standards
3. Authorize Expenditure for 841" Avenue NE Tree Trimming
4. Discussion of International Building Code Adoption
5. Update on Medina Beach Park Project
6. Authorize Labor Agreement with Public Works Union
7. Authorize Labor Agreement with Police Officers
8. 1s` Quarter Financial Report
9. Council Agenda Calendar
K. NEW BUSINESS
L. EXECUTIVE SESSION
1. Personnel Matters
2. Discussion of Land Acquisition
M. ADJOURNMENT
ITEM F - 1
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
March 8, 2004 Medina City Hall
7 00 PM 501 Evergreen Point Road
ROLL CALL
Present: Council members Miles Adam, Drew Blazey, Katie Phelps, Pete Vall-Spinosa, Deputy
Mayor Nunn and Mayor Mary Odermat.
AbsenUExcused: Council member Bob Rudolph
Staff Present: City Manager (CM) Doug Schulze, City Attorney Kirk Wines, Police Chief Jeff Chen,
Director of Public Works (DPW) Shel Jahn, Planning Director (PD) Joseph Gellings and
Recording Secretary Caroll Wedlund. Consultant Building Official (BO) Bob Rohrbach was
also present.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting of the Medina City Council was called to order at 7:03 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
It was suggested item number J-3 under Other Business, Intersection Sight Distance Regulations, be deferred to
another meeting. It was also requested that item number J-7, Application for Rezone — Weymouth, be moved up to
item number J-1. It was moved and seconded to approve the agenda as amended, and the motion carried
unanimously.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Odermat relayed the following:
• An ETP monthly business meeting is scheduled for Friday, March 12 from 7:30 to 9:30 a.m. at the Overlake
Hospital Conference Center.
• The Emergency Preparedness Committee will meet Wednesday, March 17 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council
chambers.
• An SR-520 Eastside Community Roundtable will occur on Wednesday, March 31 from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. in the
Peter Kirk Room of Kirkland City Hall.
• The Green Store Decision Petitioners' Motion for Summary Judgment would be heard Friday, March 12 at 9:30
a.m. in the King County Courtroom of Superior Court Judge Michael J. Fox.
CM Schulze stated the Council had requested a report on legal issues surrounding the trees on 84t� Avenue NE.
However, due to business the City Attorney had been handling regarding the Medina Store and school zoning
issues, he was not yet finished, but would have the information available for the March Study Session. DPW Jahn
added the next Tree Committee meeting consisting of Overlake Golf, St. Thomas and Council representatives
would take place on April 5. However, if Council consensus was not reached, he suggested that meeting be
delayed as well.
CONSENT AGENDA
Council member Vall-Spinosa moved, seconded by Council member Blazey, to approve the consent agenda.
Mayor Odermat volunteered to serve as the city's representative to the Jail Assembly. The following modifications
were made, and the motion carried unanimously:
E-1 Minutes of February 9, 2004 Council Meeting — approved with change—pg. 3—Under City Manager's Report
court" should be "trustee".
E-2 Minutes of February 23, 2004 Council Study Session — approved with changes—pg. 3—last paragraph,
Project should be $10 million; pg 4—paragraph 7, change "Medina Elementary to Bellevue School District.
E-3 February 2004 Checks and Finance Officer's Report — approved
E-4 NE 121h Street Overlay Project Bid Award - approved
E-5 Authorize the City Manager to Execute Joint Powers Agreement for Regional Public Safety Communications
Consortium — approved
E-6 Appoint City Representative to Jail Assembly — Mayor Odermat appointed to Jail Assembly
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Mayor Odermat opened the meeting to audience participation.
Ron Santi, 7842 NE 8th Street, stated the cost for the Medina Elementary School project was S10 million, rather
than S3 million.
Susan Potts, 8443 NE 61h Street, complimented Medina police officers for being at SR-520 during rush hour, as
their presence had made a difference
City Council Meeting Minutes
March 8, 2004
Page 2
REPORTS
Police Department —Chief Chen gave an overview of MPD activity during February:
• Four E-lerts were issued during February.
• MPD apprehended an individual responsible for five car prowls in the Overlake Drive West area. Car prowlers
were becoming more brazen, and had shattered a window to gain access to a vehicle. Chief Chen cautioned
citizens to hide items so they were not visible.
• Chief Chen brought attention to brochures regarding identity theft that had been issued by MPD.
• MPD issued 193 infractions along NE 24`h Street over the past 13 months, of which 62 percent were for
speeding. MPD had emphasized traffic control to help reduce speeding in that area.
• Every 3-4 days, MPD moved the speed monitor to another location, and cycled it back to areas where they
received citizen complaints. DPW Jahn added the PW Department had four in -lane pads that produced data
such as vehicle speeds, sizes, and peak volumes. It could be set for specific time intervals. The highest speed
recorded was 75-80 miles per hour.
Development Services --It was suggested contractors and homeowners be included in the Architect Focus Group.
Public Works —DPW Jahn reported the PW crew was focusing on planting trees, and following up with tree
trimming/removal. He stated some sprout maple trees on property abutting resident Rod Bindon's parcel had been
girdled by someone and as a result, had to be removed. He planned to plant a replacement tree in that spot.
Rod Bindon, 8424 NE 61h Street, stated the maple trees in question were seedlings from other ones, and there
had never been a large maple in that location. He stated planting a large tree there would impact his potential view
from the vacant lot at such time as he decided to develop it. Further, a large tree would impact the view from the
Riley property as well. He was scheduled to meet with DPW Jahn the following afternoon regarding this issue.
Susan Potts, 8443 NE 6`h Street, encouraged the Council not to plant trees that would block views.
DPW Jahn stated the girdled trees on NE 71h Street had blocked someone's view. Whoever girdled them had intent.
He promised to produce a tree report at the March Study Session.
DPW Jahn also relayed the Bellevue sanitary sewer system had experienced a power outage and had used a
backup generator for testing, which resulted in fumes and odor inside City Hall. He thought rerouting the exhaust
further away from the building and having Bellevue test at a different time might solve the problem.
Park Board —There was no Park Board report.
Finance Committee In response to a question from Council member Adam regarding the tree fund in the
February Finance Report, CM Schulze explained the state auditor had issue with the tree fund classification as a
special fund. There was a difference in how it was classified, and how that revenue and expenditures were reported
in the total financial picture. However, the money in that fund was for trees only.
Mayor Odermat reported Sales and Use Tax appeared to be fluctuating on a monthly basis, and was down by 3
percent for February 2004. However, the city was meeting expenditure projections.
Personnel Committee —Council member Blazey indicated the Personnel Committee had met. However, they were
waiting for a decision regarding whether or not to have subcommittees.
Emergency Preparedness Committee —Council member Blazey announced the next Emergency Preparedness
Committee meeting was on March 17, 2004. Everyone was welcome to attend. It was noted the Home Emergency
Preparedness Kit was now available. CM Schulze stated the quick guides would be distributed at Strengthening
Preparedness Among Neighbors (SPAN) meetings as an incentive for residents to organize them.
City Manager's Report —CM Schulze explained sidewalks had been raised during a previous Council meeting,
and the information in his City Managers Report was to provide the Council with background information. Deputy
Mayor Nunn suggested the sidewalk/roadway percentages should be checked. CM Schulze continued the monthly
permit timeline report was helpful in defusing complaints in the future. Council member Blazey noted the PD was
monitoring construction workers parking where they should not be, and the Council would need to address this
issue. The PW crew was going to install no parking signs as their schedules permitted.
City Council Meeting Minutes
March 8. 2004
Page 3
PUBLIC HEARING
School Special Use Permit Criteria —Mayor Odermat stated the Council was creating an ordinance that would
apply to the three Medina school properties. Later on, the Council would hear the special use permit for Medina
Elementary School. PD Gellings recalled at the February Study Session the Council had finalized the objective
statements, and the PC had developed a recommendation for the Council since that time. He noted three aspects
of this draft ordinance which were of concern to staff:
1. Criterion D. Emergency Preparedness Center—PD Gellings recommended elimination of Criterion D, because
staff did not feel it was appropriate for city review of the school district's emergency preparedness plan as a
special use permit requirement. Rather, any dialog on the topic should be confined to informal discussions
between city staff and school staff.
2. Criterion H. Parking —Staff felt "school sponsored events" should be changed to "special eventsto allow for the
parking demand of large events held on school grounds that may not be direct school sponsored.
3. Criterion K. Signs —It was believed regulation of design for outdoor signs that were not visible from the public
right-of-way might be outside of the city s zoning authority. He suggested some amendment of this language.
Mayor Odermat opened the public hearing to comments from the audience.
Speaking as a resident, Mark Nelson, 1233 Evergreen Point Road, architect and PC member, suggested the
Council consider additional ordinance language. Under Criterion C, Landscaping, he stressed the importance of
including language regarding clear sight lines at intersections. Deputy Mayor Nunn stated the Council would not be
adopting the ordinance tonight. Mr. Nelson also voiced concern about school lighting spilling over onto adjoining
residential properties. He also suggested the Council define some parking standards, rather than allow the school
district to decide.
John Amanat, Capital Construction Manager, Bellevue School District, 12037 NE 8th Street, Bellevue 98005,
requested a specific parking formula. PD Gellings stated staff had reviewed several formulas and decided to keep
the parking criterion discretionary. Mr. Amanat requested a specific parking formula. Mayor Odermat noted the
preliminary number of parking spaces provided to the Council had been based on Bellevue School District
standards. Her notes from the PC meeting suggested the Council should ask school personnel about parking plans
for overflow events, including the possibility of shuttle service. The PC had also discussed Grass Crete as an option
for surfacing some parking area..
Ron Santi, 7842 NE 8th Street, stated the following:
• He submitted a packet of e-mails under separate cover.
• Neighborhood mitigation should be added to all the criteria categories.
• He asked for greater setbacks from NE 8`h Street.
• Any two-story structures should be on the Overlake side, with only one story on the NE 8`h Street side facing
neighborhood front yard vistas.
• Parking and pick-up/drop-off stay in the same general area as present, but that it should be more efficiently
designed.
• The school should be thought of in terms of a residential structure. He also wanted NE 81h Street to look more
like Overlake Drive than it did at present.
• A neighborhood design committee should be involved in the process.
Mayor Odermat closed the public hearing. Following discussion, the Council made the following decisions for the
Ordinance Establishing Special Use Criteria for Schools:
A. Compatibility —No changes.
School facilities and grounds must be compatible with the content of the Comprehensive Plan for the city and with
any neighborhood planning goals that are adopted by the city.
B. Setbacks —No changes.
All parts of any building shall be set back 40 feet from any property line except that where the adjoining property is
zoned for residential use, the setback shall be 60 feet.
C. Landscaping No changes
Permit applications must contain a design for a landscaping buffer upon each of the site's property lines which
adequately mitigates visual and noise impacts of the school on surrounding residences. The design shall detail the
location and species of proposed trees and vegetation, including use of year-round foliage patterns where
City Council Meeting Minutes
March 8, 2004
Page 4
appropriate. Lines of sight necessary for safe school operation shall be considered in the landscaping plan. The
landscaping plan shall accomplish aesthetic goals while minimizing impacts to safety -required lines of sight.
D. Emergency Preparedness Functions Center —With the exception of Council member Vall-Spinosa, who saw the
school emergency preparedness center as an opportunity, the Council decided to remove this criterion.
D. (Replacing D above) Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation Plan —The application shall include a pedestrian and
vehicular circulation plan emphasizing safety and efficiency in the management of school -generated pedestrian and
vehicular activity. The circulation plan must include school bus loading and unloading operations, deliveries and
parking management.
E. Lighting—PD Gellings suggested including language stating school lighting should stay on school property,
which met with Council approval.
With due consideration for safety concerns, the application shall include a lighting plan which establishes an overall
lighting level which is compatible with a single-family neighborhood. School lighting should be designed to light only
school property.
F. Safety —No changes.
The layout of buildings and the lighting design shall not create dead-end paths or concealment potential.
G. Parking —It was suggested the Council delete "special events', not use a parking formula and leave the
language as written. The Council authorized involvement of the city engineer with the school district for review of
parking and circulation, to compare the parking plan with those used in other communities, and to report back prior
to the SUP application process.
The proposal shall include an adequate number and size of parking spaces, taking into consideration the
requirements of buses, staff, parents and deliveries.
H. Height —No changes.
The height at any point of any building or structure shall not exceed 35 feet measured vertically from the original or
finished grade, whichever is lower.
I. Massing --In addition to the maximum building height restriction of Subsection H, the design of the building shall
minimize the amount of three-dimensional bulk existing in the first 20 feet of the building on all sides of the building
that adjoin residential -use properties, including residential properties which are separated from school property by a
street. This minimization of bulk shall be accomplished through pitched roofs, step -backs or other architectural
design techniques that reduce the perceived height of the building and eliminate flat facades facing residential
properties.
J. Signs —Mayor Odermat suggested taking PD Gellings' recommendation regarding signs that faced inward. PD
Gellings suggested using existing Code provisions for signs, which met with Council consensus. The Signs criterion
was eliminated. The Council requested a sign ordinance amendment to be scheduled for a future Council meeting.
J. Land Use Designation —No changes.
Construction of school buildings or associated structures shall only be allowed on parcels that are designated as
school properties on the official land use map of the city.
K. Minimum Lot Area —No changes.
The building site shall have a minimum lot area as follows:
1. Elementary, five acres for the first 100 students, and one-half acre for each additional 100 students, or
fraction thereof.
2. Junior or senior high, 10 acres for the first 100 students, plus one-half acre for each additional 100 students
or fraction thereof.
L. Maximum Lot Coverage —No changes.
The school and all auxiliary buildings shall not cover more than 35 percent of the building site.
Council member Phelps moved, seconded by Council member Vall-Spinosa, to adopt the Special Use Criteria
ordinance with the above revisions, which carried unanimously.
City Council Meeting Minutcs
March S, 2004
Page 5
A recess was taken at 9.01 p.m., and the meeting reconvened at 9:10 p.m.
OTHER BUSINESS
Application for Rezone--Weymouth—City Attorney Wines asked if any Council member had an interest in the
property or an interest in the outcome of the rezone petition; if any Council member had received any
communications concerning the rezone application, and if any Council member was not able to render a fair
decision. Deputy Mayor Nunn had no interest, and no ex parte contacts. Council member Blazey had no interest,
and none in the outcome. He had received e-mails from citizens Art Dietrich and Henry Paulman. Council member
Vall-Spinosa also had received those e-mails, but had no interest in the project or the outcome. None of the other
Council members had any interest, or any in the outcome. City Attorney Wines asked if members would be affected
or be unable to make an impartial decision, on the basis of the e-mails, and all replied they would not be affected.
PD Gellings gave an overview of the project and provided background information. He noted the three most recent
letters from Medina citizens were in the Council packets. City Attorney Wines advised the applicant was only
allowed to bring up issues that had been mentioned before the PC, and was not permitted to testify. The Council
should keep in mind they were considering whether the PC recommendation was justified. He also stated new
evidence could only be admitted if it related to the validity of the PC's decision and was newly discovered evidence,
or if the PC improperly refused to accept or consider the evidence. He suggested the Council consider the pictures
in the Council packets as illustrations, rather than new evidence.
Land -use attorney Jeffrey Eustis, 505 Madison Street, Seattle 98104, noted the Weymouth parcel was the only
property in the Neighborhood Character Preservation District (NCPD) zone that straddled the ridge down to Groat
Point. Property owners within the zone created the district to protect westerly facing views. The parcel was unique
because it faced west, but focused to the south. Mr. Eustis stated the property was inappropriately included in the
NCPD zone. He emphasized construction of this home would not impact the westerly view of any upslope
properties. Further, it was in scale with other homes in the area, and the applicant had styled it well within setback
lines. If he were not allowed a rezone, the resultant home would be more massive than was otherwise the case.
Ron Reed, Reed Architects, 16218 Vashon Highway SW, Vashon Island, 98070, stressed this was a unique
property within the NCPD zone. The parcel actually sloped to the south. The applicant was only asking for a five-
foot height addition. Mr. Reed showed a panoramic view picture at 20 feet height and at 25 feet height. Mr. Reed
disagreed with adjacent neighbor Arne Josefsberg's testimony that he had a view during the February 3, 2004 PC
hearing. Mr. Reed stated the property in question had been arbitrarily chosen to be within the NCPD zone. The
parcel had a view to the west, but focused to the south. It also had the least slope of all properties within the NCPD.
During the PC hearing, Chair Lostrom stated the citizens committee, in determining which properties were included
in the NCPD, utilized topographical facts. He emphasized most of them had a topographical difference whether
they were in the NCPD zone or out of it. He did not believe a two -foot height difference would make a view. Mr.
Reed also stated there was a 25-foot hedge surrounding the Josefsberg property comprised of plant material that
was classified as a tree at Medina Nursery.. It could grow to be 40-50 feet high, per research through the University
of Oregon. Therefore, what was no view was suddenly a view. He requested reconsideration of the PC report.
Paul Saad, 7644 NE 8`h Street, general contractor for the Josefsberg property, stated he had been a member of
the PC when approval was granted for this ordinance creating the NCPD zone. It was the neighborhood residents
who had approached the PC requesting a 20-foot height limit. He challenged Mr. Eustis' statement that views
would not be impacted. Mr. Saad had walked the property and had planted stakes. No permit had yet been issued
for the Josefsbergs. Therefore, no height had been established for a structure on their property. He noted the
height limit was measured from the lowest point where the foundation intersected the ground. He provided an
overview of view corridors from the Josefsberg site to both east and west. Mr. Saad clarified the architect had
stated the hedge that had been cut down was really a tree. He had notified the city ahead of time the Josefsbergs
wanted to trim the hedge in the right of way, and had been given permission to do so. Mr. Saad also stated the
Josefsberg parcel was not part of the NCPD, and the height of the house would determine where it would be
situated on that property.
Anna Riley, 8429 NE 71" Street, stated she was the real estate agent for the Josefsberg property. It was important
that the property had both east and west views. A section of the hedge had been cut down to show them the
western view. She had informed them the Weymouth property was part of the NCPD zone. Ms. Riley emphasized
the Josefsbergs had every right to maximize both their western and eastern views. Further, Mr. Weymouth had
known his parcel was in the NCPD zone when he purchased his lot. The existing home on the Weymouth parcel
City Council Meeting Minutes
March 8 2004
Page 6
had a good view corridor. The PC had taken into consideration that everyone knew beforehand about the NCPD
zone and knew what they were purchasing. She did not want the Josefsbergs to suffer injury to their view corridor.
Susan Potts, 8443 NE 6th Street, emphasized assumption should not be turned into fact. It did not serve the
citizens well to overturn the NCPD. People who purchased lots in the future would use this decision as an example.
People purchasing property needed to be able to count on the fact the parcel would be the same in the future, and
those residents' homes would hold their value. She emphasized that two feet could obliterate a view.
Ron Reed did not think that a full view to the west existed from the Josefsberg parcel, but that there was a
western view to the north end of the Weymouth lot. He noted the Josefsberg parcel was actually on the ridgeline
as well. Mr. Reed distributed pictures. He emphasized the shrub was classified as a tree, which could grow to 50
feet high. The OTAK representative had determined it was cut without a permit on city right-of-way property. In the
end, it was stated it was a shrub.
Paul Saad referred to the stakes, noting when he had installed them, he had been working with the Josefsbergs.
A surveyor had not installed them, and the stakes had not been located per a final set of blueprints for the house.
Arne Josephsberg, 8620 NE 7th Street, stated he had lived in Medina Heights for eight years, and had surveys
done to consider both easterly and western views. He had made a very large investment for this property on
Upland Road, particularly for its western exposure. Mr. Josefsberg emphasized there was a view to the western
side of Lake Washington that was very important to him. Further, the valuation was based on both views. He
emphasized that Mr. Weymouth had purchased his parcel knowing there was a 20-foot height limit. During the PC
hearing, it was made clear that the reason for the NCPD zone was to protect views. No facts had changed.
Ron Santi stated the conditions had not changed significantly since the property was zoned. The applicant was
asking to change a long-standing rule that everyone understood. He emphasized the burden should be upon the
applicant, especially since the neighbors had voiced objections. He urged the Council to reject the rezone.
Edith Martin, 8467 Midland Road, wanted to know the size of the proposed Weymouth house. Mr. Reed
responded the proposed home was a little over 4,000 feet, and the basement would be totally underground. Ms.
Martin thought the residence would look out of place, looking up from Midland Road.
Rod Bindon, 8424 NE 6th Street, recalled he had served on the NCPD committee in 1997 that had conducted
research on this matter and had made a recommendation to the PC. Mr. Johnson, the former owner, had been a
member of this committee and could have mentioned any preference. The NCPD line had been drawn with Mr.
Johnson's concurrence and the committee's polling of neighbors. Mr. Bindon stated the NCPD should be left as is,
unless there were some special circumstances, and he was not aware of any.
Dick Hansen, 443 — 861h Avenue NE, stated 56 property owners had been in favor of a 20-foot height restriction,
and three against it. There were 15 citizens who could not be contacted because houses were for sale, or they
were on vacation. Further, 32 people in the 25-foot height level wanted to be included in the 20-foot limit, but were
excluded by final analysis of the Council and the city engineer It was the people's vote that was very important to
what was being considered.
Arne Josephsberg asked if Mr. Weymouth could expand his proposed home by seven feet and obtain a variance.
Mr. Reed responded they could not expand within the setbacks by seven feet. PD Gellings added if the house were
built as proposed, an addition could not be done because lot coverage was already maximized. After it was built, if
Mr. Weymouth wanted to extend, something else must be removed.
Mr. Eustis noted residents who had spoken all resided outside of the NCPD zone. He pointed out the Josefsberg
house might be located further down the slope from the existing house on the Weymouth lot. If so, they had less of
a view to begin with, because the beginning point was lower. If the Weymouth roof height went to 25 feet, the
Josefsbergs would be losing less because they already had less. The listing agent had stated view was very
important. One could not judge a view from the house that was already on the Weymouth property, because that
home was not going to be replicated. The actual view would be replicated by the yellow rectangle shown earlier.
Mr. Hanson had stated the original perimeter for the NCPD included properties on the west and east side of the
ridge. The NCPD zone excluded properties on the east side. Attorney Eustis opined that Weymouth request fully
complied with the inent of creating the NCPD zone. What Mr. Weymouth was requesting fully complied with the
City Council Meeting Minutes
March S, 2004
Page 7
NCPD zone. The purpose of the zone was to protect westerly -facing properties. The Weymouth property had been
inappropriately zoned in the NCPD.
Anne Zubko, 8604 NE 6th Street, stated people living in the NCPD zone had made real estate decisions based on
view protection. She suggested the Council look out for the good of a wider group rather than one person
requesting special favors.
Anna Josephsberg, 8620 NE 7th Street, stated it was insulting to hear she was 'insane' to want to build a house
facing west.
Mayor Odermat referred to the directions given at the bottom of the first page of item J-7, which stated the Council
must find all five of the criteria had been met in order to approve a rezone. The Council affirmed the PC decision
because not all of the conditions had been met, and denied the Weymouth rezone application. City Attorney Wines
advised giving the Mayor authority to sign the Resolution regarding Reclassification of Zoning District for the
Weymouth residence. Council member Blazey moved, seconded by Council member Vall-Spinosa, to adopt the
resolution and to authorize the Mayor to sign it, which passed unanimously.
Authorization for Administrative Approval of Temporary Construction Mitigation Plan —Shiro —CM Schulze
explained the issue had come up Thursday of last week because of an expired building permit and construction
mitigation plan for the Shiro property. He noted it could hold up the project. CM Schulze described the options at
the staff level. BO Rohrbach explained this anomaly had not been anticipated when Chapter 15.20 was adopted.
CM Schulze added the project did not meet criteria for extension of their permit, and it required a new one. In order
to obtain a new permit, the project would require a mitigation plan to be approved by the PC, which would take 50-
75 days. In the meantime, the project would be shut down until the PC approved the mitigation plan. BO Rohrbach
estimated the project could be completed in 90-100 days if it were allowed to continue. Staff had suggested a
temporary mitigation plan that could be administratively approved or an emergency ordinance to approve
requirements for the mitigation plan. There was no other option except to shut down the project until the mitigation
plan could be approved. BO Rohrbach noted the applicant had built a major retaining wall on the project prior to
beginning house construction. It had been a very complex project that could have been completed within the initial
18-month period, if everything went well. The existing ordinance required city review of all on -site work at time of
permit extension or renewal. The applicant had completed 98 percent of the required work. However, some items
had been ordered from China. There were also some other things that could not be completed to the point where
BO Rohrbach could grant an extension. Further, this project had been approved under the old mitigation
requirements, and had begun before the new Level II mitigation requirements took effect. BO Rohrbach
recommended giving the City Manager authority to work with him and PD Gellings for administrative approval of a
temporary construction mitigation plan, if the applicant could complete the project within 180 days. Council member
Vall-Spinosa moved, seconded by Council member Adam, to approve a temporary construction mitigation plan for
the Shiro project, and the motion passed, with Council member Phelps abstaining.
Dave Broder, 26109 — 20151 Place SE, Covington, stated the owners had tried to get the project completed in 18
months to appease their neighbors. He indicated they still had to apply for a new permit.
Citizen Request for Refund of Collection Fees —Council member Blazey stated he had some concerns about
this request and proposed moving it to a future meeting. CM Schulze stated he had explained to the owner the
Council would be discussing this request tonight. However, it could be a future meeting agenda item.
Ordinance Amending MIMIC 2.40 — Park Board Rules and Procedures --It was noted the current ordinance
contained some flaws, such as Council members serving as ex officio members of the Park Board. A Council
member commented it was not the PB's role to approve/recommend ordinance language for a Council advisory
body. It was suggested the word "direction" be removed from 2.40.020A and 2.40.040 and replaced with 'advice". It
was also recommended that the words "without respect to political affiliation' be removed from 2 40 020B. DPW
Jahn disagreed with the ordinance as written, as the Park Board had not had an opportunity to review it, and he
had concerns with some of the wording. CM Schulze commented staff had discussed the concerns raised by DPW
Jahn and felt the ordinance was appropriate. Deputy Mayor Nunn suggested the ordinance language could later be
fine-tuned, with input from the Park Board. He moved, seconded by Council member Adam, to adopt the Ordinance
Amending MMC 2.40 Park Board Rules and Procedures as modified. The motion carried with Council member
Phelps opposed and the others in favor.
City Council Meeting Minutes
March 8,2004
Page 8
Appoint Park Board Commissioners —It was suggested the format for the application form could be reviewed at
a future time. The Council unanimously confirmed the following Park Board appointments.
a. Susannah Stuart —Position No. 4, term expires June 30, 2007
b. Lisa Fleischman —Position No. 5, term expires June 30, 2008
C. Tim O'Brien —Position No. 6, term expires June 30, 2008
Annual City Council Retreat —The annual City Council Retreat was set for May 8, 2004, with a tentative schedule
of 8:00 a.m.- 4:00 p.m. Michael Pendleton will facilitate the Retreat. It was noted the retreat was open to the public.
Ordinance Amending 1997 Uniform Building Code —Deputy Mayor Nunn recused himself from discussion of
this agenda item. City Attorney Wines explained there were valid safety issues with installing a 54-foot cell tower
near a walkway. BO Rohrbach added the new edition of the UBC required structures in the right-of-way to have a
permit. The issue was whether the applicant would have to go through the permit process. Council member Vall-
Spinosa moved, seconded by Council Blazey, to adopt the Ordinance Amending the 1997 Uniform Building Code,
and the motion carried unanimously.
Agenda Calendar —Council calendar agenda changes were made.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
It was noted the Council had met in Executive Session at 6:00 p.m. tonight to discuss personnel matters, per RCW
42.30.110(g) and land acquisition, per RCW 42.30.110(c). The Council recessed into Executive Session at 11:38
p.m. to discuss personnel matters, per RCW 42.30.110(g). The meeting reconvened at 12:15 a.m.
ADJOURNMENT
Council member Adam moved, seconded by Council member Vall-Spinosa, to authorize the Public Works Labor
Agreement, which was approved by the Council. It was moved and seconded to adjourn the meeting at 12:15 a.m.,
and the motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Mary Odermat
Attest:
Caroll P. Wedlund, Recording Secretary
ITEM F - 2
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION MINUTES
March 22, 2004 Medina City Hall
7:00 PM 501 Evergreen Point Road
Mayor Odermat called the Council Study Session to order at 7:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Council members Miles Adam, Drew Blazey, Katie Phelps, Bob Rudolph, Pete Vail-Spinosa,
Deputy Mayor Todd Nunn and Mayor Mary Odermat
Staff Present. City Manager (CM) Doug Schulze, City Attorney Kirk Wines, Director of Public Works (DPW)
Shel Jahn, Planning Director (PD) Joseph Gellings and Recording Secretary Caroll Wedlund
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Odermat relayed an Emergency Preparedness meeting would be held Wednesday, March 24 with
Barbara Graff, Director of Emergency Preparedness for Bellevue. Also, a Puget Sound Regional Conference
(PSRC) meeting would be held at McCaw Hall at the Seattle Center on March 25 from 3:00 until 4:30 p.m.
Further, an SR-520 Round Table at Peter Kirk Hall in Kirkland will take place Wednesday, March 31 from 6:30
to 8:30 p.m. Mayor Odermat also stated, per RCW 42 30.110(g), an Executive Session had preceded tonight's
meeting from 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. to discuss personnel issues.
DISCUSSION
Red Oak Tree Planting on NE 7th Street —DPW Jahn referred to packet information on the Red Oak tree
planting on NE 7ti' Street, and noted this item was not part of the agenda. Mayor Odermat requested Council
concurrence to discuss this subject, and the majority wished to hear audience comments. Council member Vall-
Spinosa did not want discussion of the Red Oak tree planting to occur tonight, because it had not been
announced and citizens who might otherwise attend were not present. DPW Jahn explained this item had been
included in the packets because of timeliness for tree planting. The PW crew had just recently located and
purchased a red oak that was scheduled for planting soon in the exact location of the original grouping of trees.
He had contacted neighbors regarding this issue. However, the Bindons were out of town and had not been
contacted, nor had the Rileys. DPW Jahn clarified the girdled trees were in the city right-of-way, except for the
one on the Bindon property.
Gary Blackbourn, 8401 NE 7th Street, announced when he purchased his property in 1994, several trees had
been removed at his own expense, thereby creating a view to build his home. He had to replace the trees that
had been removed, and neighbors exerted pressure upon him because at some future time, the wrong plantings
might impede someone's view. He went along with the neighbors' wishes Mr. Blackbourn indicated the large
maple trees had been a privacy issue. On Labor Day a year ago while he was away for the weekend, someone
girdled these trees in what appeared to be an attempt to kill them, primarily to enhance a view and to increase
property value. One of the trees had been on the Bindon property. He emphasized the girdling of trees in the
right-of-way was a criminal act. The Police Department had sent an officer, but no further action was taken. He
had been concerned because a tree falling down would have gone through his garage. Five months later, his
neighbor, Mr. Brog, trimmed four of the trees that he had planted at his expense and at the request of the city.
Mr. Blackbourn emphasized it was not a view issue, but rather protection for him and his family. He asked the
Council to remember that his neighbors never had a view before he created it.
Gary Corbett, 8405 NE 7th Street, urged the Council to read DPW Jahn's packet, and not to reward criminal
behavior such as that demonstrated by girdling the trees.
Consuelo Corbett, 8405 NE 7th Street, asked the Council to maintain the integrity of the tree scape, and urged
them to discourage girdling activity by tree replacement.
CM Schulze thought this was an issue of policy implementation, and he was not sure the Council wanted to hear
it. DPW Jahn had done an excellent job with documentation, and Council discussion of this issue was opening
the way to hear about every contentious right-of-way tree issue. He suggested the Council weigh whether they
wanted to spend their time hearing this or whether they wanted staff to take care of it. City Attorney Wines
advised MMC 12.28 addressed this issue. CM Schulze recalled the Council had adopted an ordinance
concerning preserving significant trees in the right-of-way. DPW Jahn clarified he had been merely trying to
respond to a question raised during the last Council meeting, and thought the other side of the story should be
provided as well. Deputy Mayor Nunn emphasized it was not the Councils job to make a decision regarding the
Red Oak tree planting, nor should they be involved. CM Schulze stated the civil penalty for failure to obtain a
permit for removing a tree in the right of way was S5,000. The city was exempt from obtaining tree permits,
because they issued them. However, Medina still followed the requirements. DPW Jahn added he had just
City Council Study Session Minutes
March 22, 20C4
Page 2
confirmed today no police report had been made. Council member Rudolph wanted an investigation and a
police report. He suggested the city discourage this type of vandalism by issuing a notice in the Medina
Newsletter with a statement publicizing the monetary penalty for such action. CM Schulze stated neighbors had
been interviewed, but no one had confessed. The officer must witness the violation occurring in order to issue
an infraction, or there would have to be substantial evidence pointing to the tree girdling. The Council requested,
with Council members Vail-Spinosa and Blazey opposed and the others in favor, that staff handle this issue per
policy, with instructions that an article be inserted in the April quarterly newsletter about tree trimming/removal,
and resultant fines.
84th Avenue Tree Replacement Project —City Attorney Wines explained that review of confidential
attorney/client privilege documents from him should be discussed in Executive Session. During a February
meeting, the Council had requested information regarding exposure to liability and responsibility for removal and
replacement of hazardous trees.
Site Plan Review—PD Gellings gave background information, and stated he had talked with professionals at
the City of Mercer Island and in Lincoln, MA. He displayed a Power point slide show, covering a variety of lot
sizes and configurations. He noted enacting a site plan review program would supplement existing MMC
provisions for the construction of large homes in Medina. Site plan review lent itself better to large lots than
smaller ones. With small lots, it was a long, expensive process to go through site plan review. Further, large lot
owners had flexibility to obtain meaningful results from the site plan review examination of how the overall plan
would be used. The site plan review procedure would involve two public meetings. There would be a public
comment period of 15 days, like that for the administrative variance process. Anyone could write a comment
after reviewing the file. PD Gellings noted Mercer Island's design review program had been overhauled two
years ago to ensure that it was legally defensible. The way their code now read was very clear and usable for
developers. Further, Mercer Island's appeal rate was very low. The Lincoln topics in decision criteria matched
well with those for Medina. Further, their appeal rate was very small. Deputy Mayor Nunn commented Lincoln
was more like Medina, and requested to review a copy of their site plan review program, as he could not make a
decision without more information. CM Schulze commented with the exception of Hunts Point Circle, all the HP
lots were street to the water, so their formula worked because the lots were pretty consistent in size and
configuration. This was not the case in Medina. Deputy Mayor Nunn cautioned he would be forced to recuse
himself if the Council were to cover lot coverage. Mayor Odermat stated the Council needed to conduct a review
of PC recommendations regarding the new site plan review program, and verify that the policy direction of their
recommended ordinance met the Council's intentions. Council member Vall-Spinosa moved, seconded by
Council member Phelps, to send the Site Plan Review to the PC for final draft of ordinance. The motion carried
with the majority in favor, Deputy Mayor Nunn abstaining, Council member Adam against, and Mayor Odermat
against. CM Schulze suggested CC discussion of site plan review at the June meeting.
Direction to PC on Building Height —It was noted the PC was again reviewing height issues. PD Gellings
stated the PC had requested permission to again review pitched roofs. The PC felt they could come up with a
replacement for the 25-foot rule that would be an incentive for pitched roofs, resulting in better homes. CM
Schulze noted this issue went back to 1997, and encouraged the Council review those old PC and CC minutes.
The Council directed the PC to stop working on the building height issue, by a vote of four to three, with Council
members Phelps, Vall-Spinosa and Rudolph voting nay.
Council Protocol Manual —By consensus, the Council decided to remove Chapter 10. CM Schulze requested
Council members to send him an e-mail with suggested changes for incorporation. He clarified if a citizen sent a
letter regarding a certain issue, it should be copied to the entire Council. He also explained the Council dealt
with issues like overnight travel by elected officials when they adopted the budget. CM Schulze offered to
change the word 'will' to "may" under Section 5.06 Medina Newsletter — Council Corner. Council member
Phelps moved, seconded by Deputy Mayor Nunn, to adopt the 85-page version with the removal of Chapter 10,
to change 'will" to 'may" in the first sentence of Section 5 06, to change the review to every four years rather
than two years, and to call it the Medina City Council Guidelines. By consensus, the Council accepted the above
motion, with Council member Adam voting nay. The Medina City Council Guidelines were moved to the April 12,
204 Consent Agenda.
CDs for Council Members —Staff was requested to burn a CD for all Council members and for City Attorney
Wines, with the exception of Council members Adam and Phelps.
City Council Study Session Minutes
March 22, 2004
Page 3
Agenda Calendar —Mayor Odermat requested alphabetization of the agenda calendars. Council calendar
agenda changes were made.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Per RCW 42.30.110(i), the Council recessed into Executive Session at 9:26 p.m. to discuss potential litigation.
The meeting reconvened at 11:00 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved and seconded to adjourn at 11:00 p.m., and the motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Mary Odermat
Attest:
Caroll P. Wedlund, Recording Secretary
CITY OF MEDINA
Memorandum
DATE: April 12, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: ,Tan Burdue, CMFA
RE: Finance Report — March 2004
COMMENT:
General Fund
Revenues
Item F-3
Sales and Use Tax is S52,096 above the projected S 100,000 for this time of year.
i Investment lnterest is currently meeting budget projections.
Municipal Court Traffic Infraction is S11,932 above the projected $23,750 for this time
of year.
Expenditures
Departmental cxpcnditures are meeting budget projections.
r r
- � Y �i r r
0
K'
•
7
y
y 5 V
c
t
A C
v
�
V
C
1�
Y
—
R
J ^ N
r
C q
Z
�
I
� i L
v i
v
I'•J
Vi
Y C
b
X �
�
�
M
L
S q
L
ye
M
V �
t•1
f
`T
% '
Yi
I
M
N O
S
,ff
�
I
V1
y
✓i w b" I
I
Z_
¢-
lb 4112/Q4
.._ %edir.a
MONTHLY REVEITTE RRP-F-
03/3'_/202
M. T.S
. .���:NT �S.P^.P i(R DESCRIPS'I �Ci r._TT_
GENERAL _„ND
PROPERTY & SALES TAX
. __1 13 00 00 Geceral Property Taxes
J00 OCO 311 _C OC O1 Gen'1 Prop Taxes Ad Valorem
000 110C 1__ 10 00 00 Local Retail Sales & Use Tax
COO OC8 313 '1 00 00 Criminal Justice Pand_ng
TOTAL PROPERTY & SALES TAX
LICENSES & PERMITS
OC 22 _0 00 CO Hui tr g Permits
,l OCO crn 322 s0 CO 30 Anima Licenses
TOTAL _ICENSTS & PERMITS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
ODC 000 334 03 52 00 State Grant -Traffic Sale__ Corr
CJ1 :10 )CC 334 C6 99 00 State Grano--KC-Emergency Mgrr.t
OC1 000 000 336 06 21 00 MVET-Criminal Justice -too.
��'.. C00 C..nC 336 36 22 00 MOST Criminal Sus=ice-DCD 41
OCJ 000 336 06 23 CO MVET-Criminal Justice-DCOu.2
_._ 00 MVET-Cr_.ni na_'justd3OCCC
... �... CCO 336 06 26 00 Criminal justice -Special
r
O" CO) 2DO 33c 96 51 CO DUI/Dtder Criminal Justice
)j OCO :CO 336 06 94 00 Liquor Excise Tax
_.,1 000 OCO 336 06 95 00 Liquor Control Hoard Profits
,-,ii Oe, C00 336 21 CO CO Hunts Point Police Contract
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
CHGS FOR GCODS AND SEAVICES
D03 342 iO 00 00 Law Enforcemen= Services
_1 000 90O 347 60 OO 00 Program Fees
TOTAL CHGS FOR GOODS/S--aVICES
FINES & FORFEITURES
COl 000 COO 3L3 CO 0o Miun_cioal Court-Tra`- c Infrac
TOTAL FINES & FORFEITJRES
MISCELLANEOUS RE',ENUE
�C1 000 000 361 11 DC 00 Investment Interest
C01 000 000 361 40 00 OD Sales Interest
CO' 000 COO 367_9 CO 00 Contributions -Other
.. ,.1 000 000 369 90 OD 00 Other
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
NONREVE:SOES
JO1 C:O COD 339 00 00 00 Other Non -Revenues ;pass thru)
TOTAL NONREVENUES
.i
--CHIPTS
6_,_-,.,,
ao
..
101,161.63
2,955,-01.CC
4._<
00
16.02-
.00
161,539.°B
3 ,C9r,35
4,283
83
_4,39�
31
SO 000.00
28
50
35,601.6'
235,36C
3
4'_-,'40.31
_,_.. ,791_OC
13.4-
2,658,C5^.69
33,4C5.19
.,_,359.51
E30,OOC.00
_6-88
523,640.49
229.00
553.00
_,G00-00
59.50
441.00
33,534.19
'_J E, o_9.5_
63i,C00
00
_6.94
521,081.49
.00
_C.88
.00
6,914..._
_ ,354-40
.CD
Cn
_ ,354.40
.,,
,
250.00
6D0.00
41.6.
350-CC
.00
-OD
5-2.03
20
512.00
.00
.03
731.00
.CO
73_-OD
.0C
731.00
._.,
731.00
.
,,.
529.61
-DC
..._
329.61
.CO
_25.62
SOC.00
25._2
3r4,,n
:0,600.00
2_-
„
3,C42.87
805
.1
4,6CB.L0
-8,900.00
26-7.
.3,191.90
.00
-00
138,DOC.00
.00
133, OOO.G0
11,722-.�
��,+=5.74
169,974.00
.�.21
_s ,433.26
-CD.00
35G.CD
.00
CO
a5C.00
_,8C9-oa
acD.co
7 CO
.'0
350.C..
_,800.00
47,22
95C-00
9,845.25
35,632.53
95,000.00
37.56
59,317.4�
3,877.92
12''On.96
50,000.00
«
.C2
3-,,996.04
67.5a
267.36
.00
.00
26,
d5-
1,46C.49
1,960.49
.00
.00
1,960.49-
781.76
3,282.34
.00
.00
1,222
_34
6,137.-S
17,512-ES
50,000.00
35-03
32,467.35
10,359.52
26,530.63
i95,000.00
13
.51
16a,469.
17
10,859.52
26,53C.83
-95,000.00
13.61
168,469.17
Ib 4/12/04
Med_aa
MCN'-H:,ZREVEN-E CEPCH=
031/31/20C4
LN' NUMI.H R DESCH:PTIO^1
CTHER FIN,NCING S=RCES
IOTA= GENERA:, FL?iE
M.T.7 .
3E5 E:'r':'S
3i3.329.=c
PAGE
2 REMA:N:NG
EXPE C"'A—TON
3,'o23.80A.4,
jh 4/ 12/04
C'-of Hedica
MON'Ih'Y�^c
SeEND--TJRE
n..B^_CR7
03/31/2004
p A E
L:=-<L
ED
_CT,,LL °A LA: ICc
G-ENERAL FUND
L EG T 6,`.AT_`IE SE
"-
L,=S'-.2-
''-
00^
000
c�1 60
41
00
Professcoeal rr. ces
-0'
.,00
OG^
S11 c0
43
00
'Gravel s inir.g
410.00
325.00
,SC -,.CO
33...�
49
00
mi sce 1laneoas
.,.BS
_. .35
.CO
.,w
51i 30
51
00
ElecMors Sere Jccer Req Coe-s
.OG
=,%"o ,o
o,000
00
S�-1'
TOTAL LEGISLAT:",E SERVICES
4:.7.8F
„ -.. ...-2
23,300
00
31.9= „ 395.9d
lb 4/ 1-1/0 4
city :.'_ MG'f_"1a
MONT-HLY EPCP:.
03/_'% 2004 ?A!E
M 7 -i. Y.I.D_ s ,^,E IRS XPENCE7:
AC. ., 1..(: .I TI➢Ly DES Gt.. _^N -I EX:"E-T_U?DS .AcP OPRIA-72
..__
MUNT_C' AL CCURT
..32
42
_�
d'COO.00
=_.G6
in
LCO
0 512
41
10
Prceecu�'_nc Attorney
-
-,
ten.-�
4,:00.,,_
n;.�6
-."_ OJ
ub0
2 SJ
4L
20
Pvel-2 Eefende` _
__��
�,
��
J (`
_� E
lC
EXpe T.e65
)CO
� o�
51
.7
Muni ira_ Court. Traf-- .. C/*+C_r`_
6 44- 7
2.,, �_-'0
�GO.JC
..._,
.
54 ^400
.. GCS
':C
__2 50
51
2C
Mun :.cipa- Court -Probation
2,-62.53
_,__3.2-
C0
343
TOTAL M'YN-C RAG --CUR^
L3,936.90
4- ,_42.n
121,500
0C
9,35 L-1;
jb 4ll'f04
Ci- I c` Med'_ :a
MON-ELY Er.PEND:r_7RE
:, nC04
7 .`s. _.C. .'..a.
.._T^.UKr tiL:3Eg CESCR-PTION _..__::D LTCRES
c RECS'='.'JE
SALAR:ES & WSGES
-co o0J E13 :0 :I 00 Saiari & 'A aces
I'OTA_. 5.kLA.R_ES
PERSONNEL BENn ITS
OGO 10 21 00 Personnel BeneL s
-07AL PERSOsI:EI 3E.<Er_.o
0—HER SEF.'i10ES AND CHAR!?ES
000 �13 '_0 43 00 Travel & "'raining
LC 49 OP Miscellaneous
10 49 O1 Dues, Subsc. u o .A--:o.
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
TOTAL EXECJT :VE CEPARTMEN"
8,73a_91
039.9%
a- 4
aJ2 3
25, c
4 7.9
10,319.34
592 .55
3,OOO.00
O0
OJC
00
_, o.'JO
COO-0C
_i.2a0 .47 1?4,620.OG
_.i %FENCE..
25,33
24.I4
16,99:.99
.99
2,3f,?. .�
3 -.'ate
937.V.,
—244.4
23.24
-ib 4/1?/0-4
ci-y cf Medina
MONTHLY EXPEN::OT'_"RE RE'I) 'r
03;'311/2704
?1.T,D,
'3T I:LY.B EF EESCRI=!�+ ' <Xti SL-. =LwES -X ESGIT.eCS R ._..__L
ART_ES & WBccS
D00 CGC 5_4 10 __ 00 Sala r_=s & wages
TOTAL SALAR=ES s WAGES
PERSONNEL BENEFITS
.. '-OC 514 :0 21 00 Personnel Der -s
TOTAL PBRSCNNEL 3ENc?I"=S
OTHER SERTJ_CBS & CHARGES
'. 2CJ 00C 514 10 43 00 '[ravel & Tra:n'na
000 OCJ 514 10 49 00 Misc Gues,SuLscription5
.__ 00C 0GJ 514 1J S' ., CO Irtercvcnl P i Sew Aadi..ors
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
CAPITAL CI: L.A`_'
TOTAL, F-NANCE DEPARTMENT
GE
-,�:dEXFENDE7
TCT.A:, FALAi]C=
i
.
.,365.44 _ t ,656-52 56,928.00 _- -- 12,263.68
4, 985 .41 "'_4, 656.32 56, 920.00 25.,E 42,2r3.68
902.70 ,599.25 10,3^'_.84 _0 3:
�02 -;.. Z.'99.25 13,371.34 26.02 -...59
119.C4 3G5.S2 SOC.00 _0. 12 2,194-4�
50.00 =50.90 750.CC 20.00 60C.00
.00 10,000.G0 .01- �0,00J.00
455.52 13,250.00 _. ._ 12,794.
5,957-IF I-,811.C9 ap,S4-.34 ..Z.._
NONTEL':
EXPESCZ:L3E :EPCRT
,3,1?11'20334
-Zl—
x_�.�.
Y.LT.
.,. �_
_..._ �_.._-�
".TREE �P°R -
.•, .�.,
A N r'E
_EGA,.
CCOrC 'S ..0 +_
0 Cir-v Attorney
1C -35-�=
..,
.
2, ds.2C aC Dtr .n0
5 _
_n0
_ 1C) 'OL ,-5 GP 4
50 0neo'a -cunsel
.0)
TO.AL LESAL CEPARTMENT
10 6 E.E.
44 __ -_ _ _, .�.]J
34
-lb 4/1 _'/04
Ci C,r DE Ned_na
MCNTHLY EY.PENL;,-' <E REPOT
03i_-i 2:iO4
M.T.D. Y.T.J.
EFpE TZ:- 7PE� IX2E.`L-i;`UeES pp�Rr ocinTc..
�Ic=^_UN7 -UMBER DESC:i _p': -J;:
CENTRA-- SERVICES
SALAR--ES & WACES
OCO J00 5_2 _0 11 00 Salaries & 'dares
.10 200 S18 =0 la 00 Over me
TOTAL SALARIES s 'WAGES
PEPSCNNET. BENEFI"S
CO) cop -15 10 2i 00 Persor_nel Benefits
TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS
O-HEP. SEPVICES & CHARGES
CC0 )CO 518 10 3"_ OC 0--ice and Operating Sopplles
(:JO JGC 51d '.. Y_ 00 Fro°essiona_ Services
.. _I JOJ 000 S1S I 41 50 prof Serv-Ccmpu-er Tech Ser-i
00 000 518 10 42 00 pcstaoe/Telerhone
001 000 000 -19 '_0 4? 00 Travel & Training
"00 000 S_8 IO 44 00 Advertising
DO' 000 SIS 10 46 00 Insurance (WCIA)
:'J1 OOC OCD 518 :0 47 00 Ut_Lty Serv-Elec,Wdter,Waste
..__ 00' COO 515 10 48 00 Repairs & Maint-Equipment
JCO 000 518 _J 49 :., Misce'_lanecus
OOC CCO 518 10 49 20 Dues, Subscript-cns
JCD OJC 516 1J 49 30 Newsletter
000 3-0 918 10 49 41U phococcp`es
TOTAL OTTER SERVICES & CHARGES
BUILDING MATNTENANCE
JOO 518 30 45 DO Faun '_ Renzal
mac, t
009 000 S18 30 48 OC Repa !Maim C_t? Hal:. Sidg
000 518 90 49 00 M-sc.
TO -AL BUILDING MA_NTENAN=
$ rr L:: clpEN�E
AL
32,-,6.4I
1J1,705.OJ
_2._,
.00
.0„
_.,, 941...
32,'36.41
_C5, 705.00
3C-97
I,501
55
,433
,50-
S'
,433.=.
2,507.82
a,3a:.
15,DDo.00
2_
g J.92
„ 56 ,D-,
"z6-.63
_4,
9C
1'-"Cc0.00
44_64
2,055.20
5,679.04
20,OOC.JO
Z8.40
701.26
1,521.26
2,500.00
66.:-
176.28
2Si.88
11,000.03
2.56
-00
-.;,093.OG
74,00C.00
94.12
-96.00
1,53i_29
9,000.06
i-.JL
606-61
3,933.90
10,000.00
39.94
94.9-1
.._E.45
300.DO
98-42
69-c3
1, 362.20
ci.,.
JD
163,
24
737.23
5,044__9
20,C00.00
25.22
40I.29
920.00
5,ODo.-'0
_d.4C
16,252.71
108,812-6-;
_93,450.DO
56-2_
3,420.75
n:
_<.o_
4,E24-35
6d,968.39
4,000_,C
t_.59
2J,�4._i6
3J
_,432.9?
8,c56.17
14,320.96
id.74
7119._I
963.'1
E,C06 n
4.,
El- I -
__,955.82
4,C80.O3
54,63'.33
6, 62 94
Ci_y of Me-ina
MCNTELY Er.2ENE:TCT.E REIC.F'.
33 31i2,04
AC^_C �':d'" 1LIM.!i N?. DESCR:2T:CN
:NTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES
,11 OC3 'GO 5'_9 90 49 CJ Assccia C oc c_ WA Cities
;11 OCO OCC, -.1.9 9C 49 „_ ruyet Sotind Reaional Ccunci:
CO .70 514 -0 49 02 Suburban Cites Assoc -at,
CCC od0 519 90 49 03 ARCS
Oro 519 90 49 04 Eastsid_e Trarespertat:on grog.
500 519 90 49 C6 Dom_st:c Violence Prcgram
C'C1 CO' 00C S19 90 49 07 aellevue High_and Center
C?1 106 ODO 919 9C 51 10 King Covnny Healt:c Services
000 OOO 51.9 90 5_ 20 Clean Air Agency
7C_ 000 ']OC ::9 90 5_ 30 Kina County A:cc:co_ Ccctrc'_
.. 00C 519 90 51 40 K_ng County Water m Land Reseu
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
TO -AL CENTRAL SEEV:CES
M._._. t._..,.
00
.,20-.G=
2Ce.00
99,92
-99
.0C
45J.00
5C.CC
...
04.S:
2,IGO
0,,
3
495.9�.
-CO
11,40C.'J0
125-00
aa^_CL
2- .00
.03
.OD
_',S.CO
.CC
1-5.00
.00
4,804.0D
4,204.00
100.00
._0
_-. �.27
467.00
3C.55
323.7r
.01.
.CO
2,472-DO
-OO
2,472.00
.e_,e.
,"Sd-79
2- ,50_.00
26.2_
19,742 __:
3:,495.37
16:,36o
.-9
377,234-92
42--1
211,469.13
1b 4/ 12/0 4
c irY' _i Veiira
MC=.HLY EXPEND=T_RF
I t-�""^BER �_S-Gi7T=Cy EXPE2i _C.�-"F�7C__L'r_c5 FPS°O'R
POLICE DEPARTMENT
SALARIES a WAGES
00, ' u C 1 00 Salar es & Wages
C O 21 2C 12 c0 Overtime
___ Meru Pay
T07AL SALARIE_ n W:.�ES
PERSON'= BENE[_"'S
tUC -21 20 21 00 Personne_ Benefits
C^ , CC 52_ 20 22 00 Uniforms
3C3 ., 20 23 00 Tuitior_ ReiTturseme=
:'G'_AL PERSO,'VEL BENEFI':S
S'JPPL--ES
. 000 C.9 Z3 31 00 -IfLice Supplies
JO. ',CO _2_ 20 3' 40 Police Operat'ng Supc_ies
000 ,.] 5'2_ 20 31 50 Photographic Supp=ies
000 030 _21 2C _. 60 Ammo/Range ,Targets, etc.;
;._ CCC CCO 521 20 32 00 Vehicle Expenses(fuel,lube,etc
72= C00 COO S2_ 20 35 2C Firearms ;purchase & repair;
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OTHER SERV_CES z ::HARCES
_.,_ 000 COO 521 20 41 00 Professional Services
C7= CCD 00^ 521 20 41 50 Recruitment-Backcreund
.,.,1 OCC 200 S21 20 42 00 communications (Phone,PagerS)
C]1 000 000 52_ 20 43 00 Travel & Training
^_)1 C00 000 5�1 20 43 01 Dues, Subs_r., Memberships
.51 OCI V 0 20 24 50 Recruitment Advert_s':g
_ 000 000 -.._ 21 4- 00 Equipment -ease & Renta_S
OOO 000 521 20 48 00 Repairs & Mai.t-Equipment
00': i1CC Oco 521 2C 48 10 Repairs & Maint-Automcbiles
COD OCO 57. 20 48 20 ReJairs & Moir_t-CAD
0CC -21 2C 49 CC Misc. (Service/supp_ces)
001 C00 000 -21 20 49 23 Bicycle Patrol
..J_ 000 000 521 20 49 30 Anima_ contrz-
it
'i00 Oc 20 49 40 Dues,Subcriptions,MemhershipS
... C00 000 521 20 49 60 Crime Preveaticn/Public Educ
CO COO 521 20 49 90 Misc-invest-gative Fund
T CT_AL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
_„749.�..
S0,c94.4fi
6io"7.Sr.
24
S'O
460,232-52
24..,_
)CO
I
..._
3 , .,_...:
51
164,5=8."=
,05,377 .00
_,289-74
_, a19.76
_6,JOO.Jo
=_._
4,=80.24
_ _y3_
0
6,423-CO
8,000..,.,
8C.35
1,512
20
2 ,0T6.36
_ ,4.6.93
'39,000,DC
_-
95
_228,593.0
216,
13
_c
"_4.2_
.,26P.79
229
39
4,000.CO
,_._..
-23,33
35.87
86.30
-,000.00
6,63
913.'�..
159.03
_,63_.00
6,OOC.00
27.12
4, 369.00
_,596.62
5,D71.00
18,000_60
28.1>
_2,929.0C
.00
.70
1,000.0c
-C�
., OCC.Co
2,267,C8
_2,674.77
25,000,00
30,5C
24,325.23
881.0C
1,934.95
5,000.00
18.1_0
_,035.0_
39.25
.,552
.45
2,500.00
02__1
947.55
_,329.3-,
3,420.79
=,000.00
Z_._,
10,571,21
-33.13
18,000.00
_i.73
__,875.40
. fi0
a3
00
OC
�0
85.00
.CO
-CC
_,5CC.n
229.-]
cc5%.32
3,155.50
2
E
2 ,497.66
22C.=e
�E5-54
5,a02.JO
_v.__
4,D44.4'0
.00
.0C
24,00C-00
.Oc
24,d00-00
.00
00
500.00
.CO
500_,C
,C0
-_�0
_,200.30
-3)
_,'_'1C.0C
221.
_, _.,..6C
2,500.00
44_.20
922.2.
922.2.
3,000.00
3C.-4
_OG
.JC
500.00
..�
COO
.00
5,742.06
'J,962
.63
88,855.00
S
. _
74,292.37
c. v..']_-3
MONTHLY EX.PENC::L'P3 3E=C`:
03;3-/2C04
.-.C"lfN= PNNi.3 R CESC3IPT=
T_NTERGOV'c RS:MENTF:. SE^✓:- -
.. JOC 000 20 5: 10 Dispatch Serrices-.C. rkland
SC. C00 OCR, 521 20 51 20 D.spatct-EPS^_A
I oc0 521 ? Ul _1 30 Access WSw
-CC 000 521 20 Sl 40 Marine Pa��oL Me-_es_ar.d
C)) 7G7 S21 2J S1 50 Sa_1 ei -ce r<<soaer Board
_ 0G0 CG0 521 20 51 6:) Prisoner Transport
I �00 521 20 5 s0 Ot:1e �='-es-Add'! Police 0e-,
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
CAPITAL J:,'TLAY
T07AL PCL:CE DEPARTMENT
M_=.2_
-.-,D-
FX nNC:_.:.__
..,=
APPRCPR:.-.__D
C7
450.76
57,991.3
41^.02
_ 43_-06
5,600.00
930.00
9_'0.00
3,960.00
40,�OC,00
646.06
31,000-00
.0C
6�C.C�
5,C00.00
i4,36o.7n
UNICe FEND ED
_._... .:. 2ALANCn
94
b 4/1 2/04
MCNT'L" ._....E 3EFCR_
„3/�l/20:
AC...,l .. :LIMR CE�CRieT:CV .2 eN=�i,'?ES �X`EN: "'-i ES AF P.07 P.=P: a?C
BE
:IRE & ME7IrAS A=7 ❑i?P A3 D�E`d'=
INTE<GCVERNMENTAL SERVICES
Fire Control Services
TCTAL : N TE2.GCVERNMEN-;:L
TCTAL F3E m ME:):GAL 7EPT
OC .^0-62,0E3.C..
562,.: e3.00
2AGE ..,
''N
2,3 3.0C
jb 4/1 2/04
C_t, s_ Me -_na
MI,NTHTl EX?ENDST-PE E.E?ORT
M.T 3.=.
ACC:: C._.. -0,ER DE.,^-IP":09 _•..
3U_LOING DEP7,R'7MENT
SALARIES WAGES
_:_ C0' 6CC o2+ 60 ._ 00 Salaries 4 Siaoes
':CTAI. SALARIES � WAGES
PERSONNEL 3ENE?=7S
-c 2= 00 Perscgnel Benefi�s
TOTAL PEPSCNNPl, 3ENEc:_o
OTHER SERVICES s ;_HARGES
OG DC L24 67 4 .,_ Engineer
_01 J0„ u00 524 60 4 BLdo Of`rcial/ I-nsoEc[o_
000 000 -24 60 43 C3 Travel � Training
'G ,CC _24 60 49 00 Mist -Dees, SuL.C-iVtiOns
TOTAL OTHER SERV:—ES s :HARSES
TCTA:. BT=DPdG DE2ART`^.Eloi
,.r., LAIIC-
6,833.i._22
ao.26
1.,�oa.00
6,307.00
-2_l.
7- -5
6.l7'-00
.....
_9,y12.C2
30,762.53
10C,000.00
]0--c
41-79—_
62,EJ4 .Su'
5,500_00
24.S)
49,304.24
-05,049.E-,
371,507.00
742.91
_,-42.3_
60, 237.4-
_78,y60.96
2,500.'.;
2 2,99S.S0
MCVTHL.' G'ti PF,ND11'7EF �=="O"
a:
DESLnTICN .L?3S _..i .` J ,'FE=3-EE.. CCTA_ - 1.
EME&CENT" PF.E?A3E=5ES5
bCC -2S 60 4'_ 00 2rrfessicna' Servcces
EIdEFGENCY PEEPd+3E7)IIESS 4,542 3 .71 10,000.0- Oi
jb-4/1-2/04
C-'-Y c` msGi-a
'4C:ST^7_' E:SP3R'viT;,T PEP')&T
Y.T.
C'::;MB t:2 D=SC°TrT I; Di t:E^7 T3ES EXE' _o Ar rRCPP. -.T _
_
� J`
i _ANNIN,3 ❑EPAP.TMENT
SALARIES & WNCES
1Ci �CO 358 50 11 00 Salaries & Wages
TOTAL aAIARIES m WAGES
PEF.SCNNEL BENEF—S
Co Personne_ Benefits
.C_n. PEPSCLN_E'. EENEr17S
SUPPLIES
.,_ OOC ..CO 458 60 31 00 Orerat'_na Susnlies
TOTAL SUPruca
OTHER. SE2V_CE5 n CHARGES
.;".i 030 '�3 60 4' 00 Prof SerliCes -Planner
CCO 00�3 558 50 41 01 Planning Consul ant
_._ COJ OOC SSa 60 41 02 Hea r_nq Exam., ner
OCO -'CC Ssa 60 41 SO :,andscaue CCuSul''anl:
000 553 60 41 69 Coastrlction Mitigaricn
00' 30C S56 60 42 00 Communications
0" 000 SSa 60 43 00 "'rave: & Traininc
000 MO 558 60 49 CO Cues, Sutscript_cns, Memtershcps
JJ1 0CC OOC 553 60 64 00 7urnitare S Eq,ipmenr
_0TAL OTHER SEPV:CES � CEA2GES
TOTAI, PLANNING 7EPARTMEAT
LA_.y.V C7-
,784 .55
_ ,-84.93
92,030
24.
"
..;,21o.10
92,DG0.00
24.
_
65 2--._C
�a_
^_
4,9aP
s-
22,2s_0a
�.-.00
21.;.,
-�5-43
_JO
'6.00
r,200_CO
..
...:
_,_2i_��
q _
3,970.6B-
5,974.00
6,1-ioc
_, 000
.00
B.Ic
58,953.00
.00
4,340.0C
SC,000.00
9,66
45,160.00
c..,cGC.00
..19.25
.,....__
.C9
.C^
.00
3,0.02
_00
500.D0
92a.C2
_2,73_.14
226,6CO.0C
14.44
93,863-36
_ ,394.3a
6d, S?i.51
342,525.00
....,.
281.94s-��
)b 4/1?/04
na
M �1 )J T?_1 Ea?EN�iTtiRE RE ?l'F •.
L3%3L'ZOC4
DESCR: , 111 _ E.� .;�r__t�_s A_P� - __�,ry
RECREA. ,IEEGLRES
WAGES
OOC 23 _1 OC Salaries F. Wages
TO AL SALA_R-ES 4 WAGES
PERSON-NEL BcNE'?'
1 '4 21 OC 2ers O.lnC_ Bene__ts
..iJ CC =14 `0 22 CO i;nitorms
TC=AL PERSO.TNEL SENEE-TS
SUPPLIES
OGO CDC S'4 20 31 00 Cperat'na Supp ies
JC� .C., 574 2C 35 00 Smal cols/M=Cr EGaipmenc
TCTA- SUPPLIES
OTHER SERVICES & =;. PGES
003 3-0 5'4 20 43 00 Trav`l Sr '_'raining
:J2 CCO :,4 20 44 00 Acver�:sina
TOT.^ OTHER SFP.'i=^_?S CEiARGES
..,_n_ PE^RE=TICK-'==EGtiAP::S
.1 i l
-CTAL 13 A L =L T=
0C
.00
9,7DC.Cr
.,1
a, Cf -1'J
8,CCo 03
-JC
B4O1G._0
J�
c
20C IL
C
E o.Co
O=J.Jo
1,250_r1
CT
.00
.00
200._�
.00
CC
200.00
.00
50C.00
CC
SOC.00
.00
.00
20C.00
.00
200-0C
.00
.., ,,
0C.C,
.CO
.OB
-C,950.00
.00
. ,950.J0
Jb -4/12/04
Ci"' _- Meciaa
MONTHLY E.?PEN- RE REPORT
v3i31i2C04
AC .��E2R LESCRIPTLCN "P '_.4T
EC
PARKS DEPARTMENT
SALARIES ,s WAGES
J0_ 00G 110 576 8. _: C0 Sa-aries & Wages
,,. CC: Co''576 .,_ :2 CO Overtime
TOTAL SAT_A3_ES & WAGES
PERSONNEL BENEFITS
VOC C 3, 2 CC Perscnrel BeneCtts
J00 OC2 _.� 80 22 00 Uniforms
,CT.A:. PERSCNVSL BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
COC :IC .:6 60 31 00 Oceraiina Supplies
3C1 003 7:6 nO 31 C1 Maintenance Supplies
>.:l J00 0:0 =,0 60 32 00 Vehic-e Frel .I Labe
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OTHER SERV2CES & CHARGES
C00 00^. >76 90 4_ OC Professional Serv_ces
'Co „00 5 6 30 41 04 Professional Services MLsc
;i Coo OCO 576 SC 42 00 Telechcne/Pos=age
OO, ^10 000 6 80 43 00 Travel & Training
C1 003 000 576 BO 47 00 Utilities
OCC 007 5., 80 48 0o Regal & Maint Equipment
600 OCO 576 BO 49 00 Misceilaneeus
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES S CHARGES
CAPITAL 0UTLAI
000 00C 576 90 63 00 Park Impro,7ements
CIO 000 576 60 64 00 ^arniture and Ean_pment
TOTAL CAPITAL OC: LAY
TOTAL PARKS DEPARTMENT
:4 .:92-36
—
26
9,53C.5_
38,OOC.00
i34.S'
5O4.57
2,230.00
840.83
10,035.C8
40,2C,0.00
3C,000-CO
.C�
27.93
9, 00.-0
292.4-
-,Sd;.a.
,506.0O
635.-.
31, 21,:2
44,500.00
3,530.?6
3,630 ,96
35,000.00
526-85
2,666,27
9,OOO.00
216.06
9G6.74
2,C00.00
.w
257.7E
5,E00
.00
397._4
90.oc
,..591.oc
_2,oco.2e
4,961.03
_3,825.73
71,500.00
799.1'
4,772-03
33,CCO.00
8,=83.65
17,4e7_CO
799-:-
-2,355.8b
50,467.0C
26,023.68
78,533.92
384,_67.00
a CF
TA
24 c2
28.8-
9 .3'
1- .3-
29.3S
4.I9
12.5=
15.14
14 46
.6.d5
.44
I;`lEFPEN�E:;
o JO.�
6.SC6 22
28,469.+�
Is,164.92
_7,952
a,912 C-
4C.G'o.i"
31,36q C4
6 313.73
5, 246.99
4,COO.0
409.C'J
63, .4.2
25, 22'.37
283._5
n;,5::._2
jb 4/(2/04
City e_
^3/3= 2,34
CPERAT=NG TRANSF"35
C^0 0C3 00 20 00 Equinmeat Reo u�ecen' Eurd
_00 000 59, 00 30 00 Street Fund
OL OC Coo OJ 90 00 F3Dita' PYO, )c 3 Pund
TOTAL -'P-1P=-Tt13 TR.'v�SEBRS
TCPAL EXPENSES
4.T "'.:_
cXP_N!i: C -_zE3 ..'r PBCP3'_P. _'c5
2" 940,4al.47
�. LFEXP=:2�JEJ
JO 2 P,. C..,
lb 4/1?/04
of Me=:,
MCIMILY PEV-4---E RE--,!
D3;31j2004
M.T
,.__]:ICIT T19E CESCR-P7'CN -� `-
EQUIPMENT REPLACE:+.ENT =UC:C
OTHER FINAMCINC SCJRCES
000 395 TO 0C 00 Sale c` Equipmea: Property
OcJ 00 i95 20 00 00 EIIID-Insurance ReccveC
7ies
TOTAL OTHER FINANCINC SOURCEa
TRANSFERS
TCTA:, EQUIPMENT 4EPLACEMEN':
C7 =, 9C9.47
4,909.47
PAGE 11
s ,,- RF;MA-N:"I3
2STIMA'_ED TC7-' : N
_,000-00 .JO
CO 0
5,03C.00 95._3
4,9C9.47 S,000.00 ;e.1e
00.00
4.909.4-
90.53
j b 4/ 12/0 4
TLAY
_:w,var�\<\re
TOTIAL EQU:7MEN7 az _
@ ±l2±4
MCNTH:,Y RE"✓ENT- s.EFCF.:
03/31/2C04
M,. .E
NLT°cER DESCHIPT:CN kECEIP=S
^_1 TY STREET FIND
INTERGCVERNMENTAL SEVEN ::E
C00 C00 336 00 67 DC Moto- Fuel Tax! Cnres�r_ctedi
�00 JCO 336 OC 88 60 Motor Fuel Tax'Restriated
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
Oza C00 3>7 00 _O OC From General Pond
TOTAL OPERAT:NC T9.AN=:E S
TOTA:. CITY STREET PL_ID
PAGE 4
2,956.2E
9,809.75
43,O0O.00
22.21 ,3,190.25
B6
4 ,586."Z1
n
23,25�
n
.�.
e_.o� 15,563.'9
4,355._1
_4,396.46
63,250_C0
Z2.7.. 48,853.54
.00
.00
100,000.00
v_ 400,C00.00
.�.,
400,000.00
.20 400,CC0-DO
_4,396,46
463,250.00
3.1- 44e,853-51
-lb 4/12/04
I-tp
of M-di.-.a
MONTHLY
E%PEHCTT'n'
-,7M
"
03/"_12004
M.T,D.
_._.D.
o
LNE%PENT
ET
...
^,I5
_R
rLR ...
tP EN �=.,:_:.J
TIX r-N:I--•,
S
A. DRJYK-A-'_D
T 3 T
-..,
O LANCE
CITY STREET FUND
SALARIES n WAGES
-,_
C00
COC
Sit
30
11
00
Salaries & Wages
12,46C.33
35,993.,7
140,000-00
2_.-_
1C4,306.03
TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES
12,46C-33
35,993.97
140,OCT -00
2
71
1G4,::]6.
03
PERSONTNEL BENEFITS
OCC
H O
542
-0
21
O0
Personnel Benefits
3,C22-55
3,686.6_
-5,000..,-,
25-7-
21,113.39
142
30
22
00
Un_Lor ins
.JO
._0
e, 200.00
-��
2,200-00
-OTAL PERSCITNE' BENEFITS
225--
8,836.61
37,200-00
2'
89
23,31-_3C
ROAD S STRRE7 MAINTENA.CE
COC
';00
542
30
3_
0C
Operatina Supplies
965
.72
8,000.00
_4.,2
6,B22.63
1?-
0 C 0
300
542
30
35
00
Small Tools/ Miacr Equipment
.J
..
.00
_,SC0.00
.O0
_, Soo
.CO
OCC
OOC
542
30
41
C0
Professional 'services
BO
779_e2
60,GOO.00
1.30
59,2L
h3
1
0J,
000
542
30
41
10
Rcad � Street Maintenance
3_
2,337.-,0
ISO, 000.00
i.56
_4 662.3C
0
000
542
30
45
00
.pia chine Rental
-00
.00
3,500.00
.00
3,500
.00
OCO
000
542
30
47
00
..t__ity Ser,rces
34.:0
68.20
1,C00.00
.i-32
931.80
_,_
000
00C
542
30
48
00
Equipment Maintenance
.CO
4,
541.99
4, 000.00
113.55
5=1=.99
CoO
000
542
40
41
0C
Storm Crain Maintenance
2,281.:+
45,000.00
42, Z3-66
_
.,C
500
542
_3
41
00
Street Light U-
6-.21
5,905.._
2'_,000.00
23,_2
15,094.2_
:3
010
00O
542
h4
41
00
Traffic Control Devices
536.63
598.08
S, OOC.00
__.9h
4, 40L.92
_31
OCC
000
542
66
41
00
Snow & ice Remova-
.10
.CO
1,00C.00
20
1,000
.00
'CO
542
67
41
00
Street C1ean_aa
.00
:C9.16
:5,C00.00
73
:4,890.c4
TOTAL ROAD & --T MA=N"EN.ANCE
3,0.9.94
_1,198.37
315, 000.00
5.65
2_ 7 ,251.13
CAPITAL OUTLAY
;O �'
^CO
595
30
64
00
Machinery and Ecuinmenn
.00
-00
2,762.00
...-
2,762.�_
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
... ..
-CO
-. _o.00
._..
�,352.00
TOTAL CITY STREET -LID
1B,552.62
62,6"]9.45
494,962
.00
i
ee
432,282.51
if) 4/12/04
Ci-v oP M.F_d_na
MCN-HLY REVENUE REPORT
.,3!3l/20C4
ER CES'CR=?`__ N
TREE EL^ID
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
ICI, C ��; ]C SJ CO CC^er NcnRevenues Yee F.eFace
TOTAL MISCE-:,LANEO:;S RE•?`1UE .IC
TOTAL TREE FL -ND "C
o_.o'z.SC
?A,. Eo
R.EMA,N_N�
53343,374 EO-
�33.'- 3
ib 4/ 4'_/u-4
C23 of Meal -'a
,'3V_'HLi EXS=IT:,-RE REPORT
03i3,.20C4
N'TMC R DESCRIPTION
TREE FUN:
OTHER SERVICEES & CHARG F.S
700 GCO 5B9 00 49 IC Miace_lanecuS-Tree Rec_acemeaL
TOTAL OTHER SERT:CEE a CHAFGES
TOTAL TREE :!,'N:
IN" T.... T.C.
EXSEN:CT73EQ A-,T .C?RT �,TEL
2,9Ca_14
82,05s.29
2,?89 .46
2, 908.14
2— 053.2H
Z,. Ci
-
82.053.26
SAGE ZO
ro �: LR:EX.=ENDEE
3 54 1,1 4
3,=4 .,I, S. _4
_5 -'.4
jh 4/41/0 4
Ci[y of Medlaa
M014 HLY EYPENDIC'-RE RE= C3'C
PAGE
03131i2C04
M.-.O.
Y.:.7_
8 DF
;IJEAPENEED
"<PENE . URES
,nUREC
PR .rES
__'1:_
3ALrS:C3
�,_��.. .. NUMBER DESCRI2T=GN
PARK PROP. DEB: SER''1SE F'ND
PARK PROP DEBT PR. C PAL/=ST.
_. _
1,624.28
4,922A3
b -66
24.95
a o _ _�
i00 00 591 7E 9'] 00 �"_nCiDai
3's.
94 25.05
2 435.
C00 1,3 S7L 76 a3 00 Interresc
',vu8.02
a,-5d.5^
9,'�95-�
nl.o'0
36,38
r
`-.0�
2�0-' j
'
TOTAL PARK PROP DEBT PR:N/IN--
3,022-30
T07AL PARK PROP DE37 SEPV Fu D
.., 3 2.30
9,G95.9C
_5,387.60
2° C]
27,290, I0
lib 4/12/04
cf Me3,ia
03j32004
LUMPS? DESCRTPT=GN ....__.To
CAPITAL 2R'j ECTS IT=
:AXES
00^ OC OC REAL ESTATE EXCISE —AX
TOTAL TAXES
M:SCELL.1"1E3US REVENtiE
TOTAL CAPITA: PRO--ECTS FUND
FAC .
3CO,OCO.00 124,225. 9
300 OCO..,, 39. 134,22E.39
._,�92 .3G LS,-"11 .__ 300,000.00 38 S9 19d,22B.59
Cl Cy of Medina
1-0.-:,7,e Sf EX71FIT--:`RH 3c:V�'2T
io3/-/C^'24
M.T.D.
f._�.�VT H=hiB ER DESCP' ,_( N E.t?EP7DrT:IR ES E'C _T I
CAP'_T.AL PROJECTS ='TIE
IMPRCVEMEN"5
30'/ ^OJ OOC 5?5 30 63 Ol Read CcnstrucGCn
4u 07C 535 30 63 02 Storm Sewer Construction
D__ 00C =95 30 63 03 Park Improvements
,�. ICJ ,:J; 5 30 63 10 S:dewa r �2n. Avp/CAE 9r- S^_
TOTAL :NiP ROVEKEV'PS
TOTAL CAPITAL PRC.73C.S
5,032-94
_ _16.82
230,OOC.00
6._.
215,953.12
7.90-
5,3"5-9_
338,000.'JJ
Z.22
330,491-99
_0,40S
-5
_- ,
.76
562,000.00
6.16
_=2,448.24
10,40d.75
35,55__76
568,0CD.O6
6.26
5�2,�48.2d
ib 4/12/04
7: - of ed_na
MOON-E lY REVENUE :--ZORT
03/31,20C4
„C7NT
C]CMEE4
CESCY_PT1 G`N
NCN-REVENUE
=RUS: 7C,IE
NOS
-REVENUES
Co'
000
389
12
52
0l
'WA St R=dg Code Eee
�_. OOC
OOC
389
12
52
03
WA St-jud'_cial :nfo Systems
E71 '.)C
DJC
389
_Z
52
06
WA St -Stare 2ert_on
OCO
389
'2
52
'.,,
WA St-S[ate 30%
JCO
000
389
12
52
08
WA St -Trauma Care
000
000
389
12
S11,
11
WA SC-SChCO: Zone
.,O
389
12
32
8'
Dcpt C` ..IC -Alien $13
CSC
0,0
389
12
52
88
Sun Permits -Cent 2' Eic S_8/21
CJG
389
-2
52
89
Gun Permits-Wa S_ Pat_cl
i$241
-CO
00C
389
52
90
WA St Patrol -Alien ($491
AGO
OOJ
389
17,
52
99
King County -Crime Victims
OTAL Ncer-..=.E;ENUEs
TCTA:. NCN-REVENUE- -R*JST
7CND
M ?.D- Y.T.Q.
PA iC
°s C_ R2MA:N:5G
s AL
43
:62.Co
.00
1,048.
95
�,OBC.3S
-00
.D-
3,08'
3,-4),.1
2n
-00
1,332.43
,69G
.45
.00
48-
Bd.54
95.54
.30
.7C
cE.:4
3
0
.00
-&3
10.00-
18.0C
,O.00
90.00-
-4.00
.2
C
.CO
�0-
.09
98.J0
-GO
e.^.C-
98
493
_51
.00
.-0
493-51-
447.39
2_,9-7
.2,
_00
.00
2b,97,
2
,.44',
.19
25,91'—
.JC
.G�
26,:7..2
-
1b 4/1'1/0=4
city of Nedina
MONIHLY EXPENCITUPH R5,CR=
0311=/2Co4
NCN RE`JENtiE TRL'S- FUN::
NO?d EXPENDITURES
63_ _,,., c30 589 12 52 8, Dept of sic A__en $33
An me 090 589 12 52 a3 Gcn Perm._rs-Dept of Lic-s18/21
_: CC0 00C 589 n 52 89 WA Sc Yatrolun Perrr.its (S24i
oCC 589 12 52 90 WA S� Patrcl-?,lien (s25)
TOTAL :ION-EXPEND=T'JRES
=ZPHLV, ,.
.J. _._..
TIE =-RzS EZ?nND_T_"EEE N;PP:A-ED
PAGE 24
WITKISNIED
TC.T;, 3 LTD- --E
30.20-
1a.CG
90.c0
97.00-
48-20
48-00
.co
':J
48.00-
oc
e.2o
00
ao
9a-co-
25�.��
jb 4/4 2/0 4
Cite of Medina
check Kcq,iStcr
March 31. 2001
l !iCCiI
'
vENLCP
-
'-E
.Ul➢h?L
i➢�lLC
NL?B E2
Vn� _ SAME
�I RE' KE
. __= NLTB s r
0 3/c4
:0/CC/OC
MP._ O- J0I300 G 0 C H_. CC 49
-
°.37
1L100
PETTY C'SH
RCr ENIS9 PETTY -ASH
MAR 00: OCO JC'.� 5L3 :0
=EP ENISH PETTY casr.
MAR'04 001 000 C?0 521 ZC 42 :.
REPLEN -, QH ?ETT'i CASF.
INVOICE =AL
RO'dBBACY:, G. 3C9E RT
C /'s/�
CO/ O/00
- 2 COL 70O CC 124 611 Y_ ..2
_._-0
8,?3"].75
1�_�_
H'01 DOING - AL
1NVCLCE T_ 7.Od�
ET, L_,C
03/CB/04
r0/ D/ �
CCl
o _2 0CC COO Si3
.__ -
1,170.CC
1810
P✓E3
WEB __'_ENS^. FEE/..,STING
_:I,'O-CE :C-7,L
-8
_O.00
10040
ASSCC"A'=IO-4 OR rJ9LLC TREASURE
0�' 3/Ca
^0/CO/OC
0._ C-0O OCO -� 49 �..
20.4 rHT:
CMPA T
::QVCICE TOTAL
-
9070
LCWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT
03/09/04
00/CO/CO
FEE COL 000 COO 321 20 31 JC
268.45
_,:PPL.ES
2EB'94 1:1 90C GOO 542 _:, __ ":0
SUPPLIES
TOTAL
'Lo2
250.00
L2585
SC'HUL H, EOUGLAS i
0 C9/04
CD/CO
MAR 9 —1 JDO C00 5'3
.Ar TC n LCWP,NCE
TiVCiCE TCTAL
'
13404
SHLRG�r�Cc 3r: :EV�
.0
oO7
_.,
j',!T 1'2i APR'J4 .,Ol 00 CC, -Lo ,0 45
r3_
�:..00
STORAGE
'JT1:T ;_'9_A2R..J4 00"- 3C-C'300 513
ST-RAGE
I>nICI., CE T._L
35-
A(7CURINT
C31,10/04
CO/00/CC
1011660-2C'J31Z?1 COL OCC 900 52_ _0 a_ _C
'9_32
39.25
BACKGROUND SEARCHES
INVOICE TOTAL
1011660-22,40229 OO1 OOC COO 521 20 4_ SC
BAC{SROUNr SEARCHES
:N'JOICE TOTAL
'9_82
422
ALLEGIANCE TELECOM CP WA
03/10/04
JO/00/00 799CC56 00= 000 000 52_ 20 42 00
113.85
TELEPHONES
IwoICE TOTAL
3493118 001 300 COO 521 20 4: C'
TEL -_PHONES
PASE
=51.. '
A�'(7 -1
_7.85
68
13 .34
3 a.3?
8,937-:5
30. CO
...CC
13C.8
268.+5
25C.Ct
25C.I0
12,.]0
123.J0
:C9.'2d
2. .110
56.42
43
J h 4/ 12104
Cite ref -Medina
check Ke2istcr
\March 31, 20o4
_C JCL"V T'16 ES
_.,._:_E IQ-
-�.�_
..''o ATS"C4
0 C; GO 'a
0C_ ':]GC OOC 5,o °0 42 3 .
i NVOICE TOTF=
...6 AT&T 'WiRELES3 S^Rv:C..S
03/1 4 „7' 0, -= 04
�?6.00
="Pi C4 CE TOTT,L
- -
42C 25
B2E AUTOG'RAFIIICS/RAF EWER?.
"C/04OcGO "G28T
64 �..
-A,:T^_ _ 3RAPn_TCS
'CC '00 :.
_=.29
e'O AVAYA :NC
_.'S394
MA: NITEVr,1dCE
3-;
1500 BE-LEVUE C=TY 77 .-'JRER
03;ICi04 "J "e/00 FEE 4A
001 OOO 000 576 56 4^ =0
SEWER/WATER
:-D 2-4B
00-_ Co0 OOC 5.6 90 4 _.
Wr.. ER
:NVOI�E "CTAL
FEB'04C
001 oCC Coo S.8 '_0 _- 00
SEWER /`n.IT ER
-1, ICIC7 7CTAL
805.=3
2300 BLUMEN IAL L_ "'CAMS & EQU-PME.`I
0:,"0/04 0 4
0 000 0iG
__.._
PCLiCE-fC;'.F.
323"'5-
Or- CCC 000 S2: 20 Z2 ...
PCL:CE-K NE
NVC:CE
345935-0:
Col COC 000 521 :.3 2Z �u
PCL=CE-`:'r.EN
iN"'7OICE 7CT.4L
345999
col CC" OOC 52' <0
PCLICE-C9EN
1NVO:CE TZITAL
352391
001 000 000 521 20 22 OO
PCL:C£ SK-NNER
:INOTCE 'T'OTAL
353693
00_ COC CCC 521 :� 2z 70
PIL:=-E-SKINNER
C Ic.:.
1 ?S.JC
196-J_
4Z,-35
65
_5.25
132.0
3E.5�
E 83
20d.'4
i2' c
86.s9
SE.i3
9 36
0.36
91
332.n4
i :.-13
.1b-4/12/04
Ci of -Medina
cB/kRA§tcr
N larchJEn4
PA °
`
Z
9r:
y ck
RE::7ME:
_ e
»mv
Amount
NUMBER �rzITT"i:
WEB ZES:3N
ne:
zs=
sew =z:PUB s: SAFEry Ira»e a««s
5 z,r:v:= s z
4-7
RXIDIC s:. \s
31
s w
wv ENA COURIER, a:
zx«a z«»x
{\ }\\ z,e:= s z
z w
DOL ws,
)bdl2±4
Cite ofAledina
Check Rcgistcr
March 31. 2004
Clwck
111Ak
VENDGR
�. ll ❑1t)c,C
NUMBER "E. L... A:4E
- �-
ISS'TEC P L REL D C-, - •IC.
G]NT_ : LM3-R
aTIO❑RI
C3/-3,:4 ' C E C4
CC CO OCC �25 EC
��
g2 5 FINN- N, KR_ST z.7
�JiCL
EMERGENCY :`EP-REENZSS
INVCICE TOTAL
G :C/CO/20' J BJ_
C0I CUC OCO 52: 2. 48 _D
--
0 48
I1400 vPD .CE SELLEL'_E
y'10/OS
20CC -tipWa
IN-CO:CZ T _.A
_..32
5825 CCCDSELL POWER !LL_PMENT,INC
'�3� J; I4 � ��i C� 2224C5
0 l: 000 COG 576 80 __ .,.,
_`"'
SUPP°__S
1NT:CE TOTAL
5d?5 GAFINGER W47
1 04 015C/Z0 s _ 36-4
C 000 000 512 0 43 OG
_",2pI
..
507
,NC
5.,.:7 ...CT'.RE
=N.'n_CE TOTAL
132.,2
987.CC
18108 HARDEN CEC. :NC, C_P-
.,i :C/04 G 'CO/O^ 2952
103 OOC 000 E29 0C v '_0
^PEES
INVOICE T?7AL
6330 _HCME DEPOT CA' IT SERW.CES
03 10/14 /00/0C ELB 04
00'. O^0 OOu S16 80 - G-
SUPPLIES
1NVGICE _.;TALI
23.
6340 HCMEGUARD SEC'S TY SERVICES
C3/10/04 J'30/00 CD 793
C01 ^00 OCO 52] 2C 42
-� . -
--
POLICE SEC:.R`"TY
INVOICE TOTAL
=205
SAE OF
B210 KC PINAVC' S=._L SERVICES
3/10/04 0'00/OC 1234615
vol 000 003 52' 2C -:
M=EMEANCR 3CC4:VG
_NVO:CE TCTA_
176.88
7600 KC SCURN+L 14EWSPAPEPS
0 _9/04 COCC/C0 1297672
001 OOC OCO 5la 1D 44 :0
20
LEGAL ADVERTISING
:N-!OICE .=TAL
90.00
8310 KING = UN_C' PRLAELR"
TV10; 74 C C,o5 ZOC4 CROP TAWS
201 00C 000 E16 e0 kJ .,.,
i0":
REAL ES?ATE TAXES
111VOICE 'TOTAL
8736 L- DEAN, INC.
C3/1C/04 CO/00/20 OEIC7135
D01 000 000 57P 80 22 DO
1920E
2:2.15
PW CN:PCRMS
INVCICE TOTAL
CE708833
001 00, 000 5.6 6C 22 i0
P'W JNI=CRMS
INVCICE TOTAL
192C9
284.51
18099 MICHAEL'S DRY CLEANING
03,10/04 00/30%00 -e6'04
001 000 500 521 20 22 A
PGLICE-CRY _LEAN:NG
_N7:CIC3 TCTA!
PACE 4
DIETRI131:7 ..
CUTT
s-C GC
-, G 4 H
_: 42
43.82
4-- C
41.0
92`.35
9w" 35
144.-4
'44."
8-_. J1-6
97 . G;
243.45
243.45
29.JC
224 .5=
284.5_
jb 4/1-'A)4
Cite of Mcdina
Chcck Raoista
March 3 L 2004
PAGE
5
v-:rcaa
'�uniL,r
,Amount
NUMBER
. _a CR NAME
_..' 7.
_MED
_.,.. __ N_.
17::c_:_rT :4t'-_R
'r4T
13_-92
10300
NELS&T TRUCE _D :.VENT CD,
._, _0/04
C-/71/G.
22-2
3,L C3C -0O .21 2C
46
_.,
2
__..__
PC_OCE A37C
_.CAL
92
10395
NEX-EL CCMM77N= -._0NS
C°, ],),I
iOC/CO
OAN2� -EE24'-4
001 OCO 00O 518 _.
42
2-C:
02__
o4d.33
JAN2-. 7E324'14
LDo_ 008 -_CC 553 S_
4,.
3c.5..
CELL --:LAP PHONES
jl>,N26 _ m24' 04
001 000 .—O _ , _ o.
.2
00
P3CNES
jAN22-PEP24'04
',Cl 000 000 521 2..
42
.0
36C .4
_...._,._..R PEONES
INJOICE IOTA=
643.33
130.09
19025
O3ERM �LER, DA E `-0
2,-0,'04
0C
a MAR:NE
,. .._ CO0 o0C 521 2C
31
4_
_...._o
?"'EAR, s_CN 3AT.'ER'.
_N ..,___ TOTAL
13D
..9
K._.
10800
OVERLAK2 PHOTO
03,10/04
04(10/00
27492"
00_ CC0 GOO 521 20
__
S'
_-47
_1213
2_..__E PHOTOS
TNYSICE T07AL
.�.
i2696
001 300 000 321 27
__
__
2.
40
MUCE PSC':'CS
NVC_Cc TOTAL
29.4„
2
56
iI01n
PAC-F C C:c_..2 AUTOMATION
CO/C C,CP
46'
COI COC DOG _21 20
45
Cl
3550'-COP:= LEASE
211
352-"^
11020
PACI=T_C 'OPSC'LS, IN^
^0/00/CO
G
00_ 000 00 'i76 =j
..
_4
_2.34
TCPSCILS
0385 7
301 00O 000 56 5C
41
04
55.2-31
TCPSOILS
=PMCIC., TOTAL
62.__
039123
001 coo 000 576 80
I
14
53.�-
OPSO:Ls
INVOICE TOTAL
53.21
039124
001 000 003 576 90
41
C4
39
.59
T0rSCILS
IV'iC_CE .„_AL
39.59
039_63
'DOI OCO 003 576 50
42
04
55.40
TOPSC:LS
NVOICE TO -.Ai
-,".41
o393C3
Go. 001 coo 576 GO
4_
:4
59.40
TOPSc iL,
lb 4/1 2/ 4
Cite of'Medina
Chcck Rc«istcr
March 31, 2004
VEN OR
-TC:CE NC.
CCL"NT NS*h:B EH
�`.
lT
NUM R
.Ew -.. P_ NAME�
-� R'.
cME7
_
LL[I7DCC
-�Illhlll
8:i-5
1:700
P:iG E': SGUI]D EN53G-f
G�!_J/OQ a
��iGG
a
= .. _
OOi 000 'CDC S-G 30 47
-_
_ 0
_.JVCICE TOTA_
FE9'74C
001 OCO OCG 5_8 4"
50
ELECTRC:TT
FEF'C41)
00- C00 000 596 90 4.
3C
ELECT:=CITY
INVG.CE T.,TAL
'0/CO/OC
°_3 04E
'r
^9.ze
11820
QWEHT
0�'.OIC4-
__.._
''0/04
/C0/,3
3/2/14 MILEAGE
001 000 003 515 10 43
._
18089
REED, RANDY
03
-"_-_
PORT T_OWNSEND
_N-70:CE 'TO'CL
RCBERT5 3^LES
00'_ OCO CDC ''8 _0
=,M9ER5
COPY
=br1OICE TO"'AL
30.00
SUBURBAN CITIES A_.,.,_
03;-C/04
CO/OO/00
864
101 000 DOC 511 6J 43
0_
_3550
PHE:.PS -ITRLY M-G
iNVOICE TO-CL
'2
251_l
18'09
T_GERDIRECT.COM
C3/17/C4
CC/GC/OD
P4903n-SC-C'
001 100 00C 513 =0
LCD MCNITCR '__
I NdCICE _.,.._,
45.88
--3933
OCN-UNITED CARRIER NETWOR35
73" 0/04
70/20/00
'D51'9604
Doi 300 000 521 2, 42
CC
'9]2.
:05�4�252
D'I 000 ODD _<_ 2C 4e
CC
P OLiCE-TELEPHONES
INVOICE _., ...:.
=9222
206.46
16156
WA ST DEPT OF iNFORMATICN
03/10/04
OC/OG/00
20C4020206
13_ 000 003 S_S =0 4:
SO
W?tiDCWS XP PROF
IWOICE T=U,
-04.D0
16152
WALDRON & COMPANY
03/10 /^.4
CC/OC/OC
WRC4-4?
001 000 000 5:9 _0 dl
00
19223
HUMAN PESCL:2CE5
i NVCICE TOT,-:,
16151
WASH:NC MACH -NE, INC.
C3/_0; 04
C0100/C0
1020
001 000 OCC 521 20 32
20
FOL:CE -.PUTTS
591-2`
,.2.91
_2
i1
50.=0
22 .3'
:6, 46
104. DC
04.00
40 '
1b-4/12/0 4
Cihv of Medina
Check- RcLLyktcr
JENI)i73
�ILrilh Aill"IitIY ILL'MnER ;3NDGR NA:^�
5 18C20 C:,7MAR=NDUSTRIFS, 'NC
.. «,. 355.6- 31 )0 CHEVRON
2 !'P..ES 3250 CLYDE HILL, C':'_ OF
6 725 .v'JB�IN, LIN➢A M
9229 _2.63 5500 GOODMAN, DOILNA
.--� ,,824-29 18952 KING
-231 1,098.38 8750 KINKO'S :ITC
-9232 :20.00 9870 MOEREP, BRIINA LEE
:9233 2,44I.60 10550 OFF:CE DEPOT CRED-T PLAN
March 31,
2004
PAGE
..-STR-Pti=:CN
_CUNT
>:-0CL:d'�
,3 -0%04
OOG 0G0 54: 64
4_ .:
_13 .25
^RAFF=- CEV: CES
:NVCICE TCTA.L
213
25
C310/9+
000
3_B-
M.=TNA STREL :�EPT
I N4O-CE --7AL
0 .'i34
0J,2011CO
3/3,'C.4 NE -2.
3C? 11,0C 003 �95 30
_: .. '_
205.S5
3O% :.CSTS
-NV2'l— TOTAL
2J8.65
3.,
FEB'04
:01 OC9 COG 524 E9
4- _Z
2
66
SUIL�II:G _NSPEC:oa
INVCICE TCTAL
_,_:2.66
3 =,b4
3n/C'D/00
COPPED MAg3P.
C01 000 00c 51B 9G
49 O0
BRA:J=I-UPSTAIRS
=IS3'C'CE TO"A:,
_2
63
J 3, 1'i C4
CC!CO
12:38'-
30- 000 000 595 30
4 824
--
MEZ-NA. BR-DGE 'EPAIR
I N✓oICE TCTAL
4,82_-29
3,1-/94
C/OC/G9
7 350G16982'_
Jo'_ O00 300 _19 _0
49 43
25O
73
COP -ES
INVOICE 7=_ :.
2,_.�_
S_%CC:"COR3
0G1 000 OGO =25
EMERGENCY PREPARECNESS
_1-oTCIC2 =AL
1,497.�_
5-35001"0250
C0: 000 000 51H -,
s_ _j
_+_-
.:
('^DIES
:NJCL^_E TCT, i,
-+--''-
;'04
:iC/00/JC
'4,' '4 MI'.EAGE
001 ., .^,0 0.0 521 .. .,
4�
12G_^.0
NWPAC MEETING
iVVC_C7 TC ..,L
_z.._..
03/17/04
CO/00/30
FE2�o4
001 On on s R 1
2,o100-18
SOPPL-ES
E EB'04
On000 000 52_ 20
- 1-0
..�-
S:PPL-ES
FEB104
00- 000 000 5-6 80
31 0C
291.48
S':PPLI ES
EE8'04
32- 100 000 525 60
41 9C
-2.33
SCPPLi RS
INVOICE -OTAL
2,441,SO
11) 4/12/ 4
Cit% of NIodiiia
Chcck Roister
March 31. 2004
- Gp�
D_ I
Amount
7?L DrR
-EE_'+ED _.. �_�__ _:.,. �. �'_� L_I" JUMBEF
�.IJ
\lllilh�:
03 :;4 J'.-i C.;. .._ _ J-N2'-044 10, 0T0
e
L,386.
1C7C. J�a{
_
PT A�OT-TC
T_NVCI CE TOTAL
3,i08.00
CEr.:3-SAP23'04=?. 1 r I r, C:; 030 5"'6 EED
69.0"i
947H A1_
INVOICE -„_A.,
:;, 569.T_
AN24-FE3-3 `S4?. COI J00 000 559 60 4-r47-?o
LA.MS=----NS.:L7ANT
=AVp4-?ER2C 04PA CC! 00r 000 558 60 41 .,_
2,869 ::^]
PLANNING TONSUITANT
IwcICE T.._r.L
-_-...
2L9.30
1101- ?AC:FTC OR'ICE AOTCMA.TTON
L;305-2C?-ER LEASE
-NVOI CE TOTA.",
2'_9.__
3.36
2-33
11270 PITNEY EiWES .NZ S'PP"J-E5
�_�i�%04 G.,, .. C0 423417 C.;- CCD 000 519 12 41 �C
�2_-�C
PuLEAR METER
INVO:CE "_..--
-2�.�-
9,524. 94
12C05 ROTH HILL ENGINEERING PARTNERS
3,_ CC3100/00 CAN'04 001 000 000 524 6C :_ .._
8,643.,.'
ESG-NEER-:d3 =NSI;-TA.NT
-AN'04 301 000 000 576 Sc 63 c„
199 :7
ENG I:JEER-`iG 'SCR:S v'..TA;I'I'
S.AN'04 307 000 300
ENGiNEEB ISG =4SUL7ANT
IN1101-_E TOTAL
-..... 54
_3233
180-75
i3410 S:CINN=R 7CGEP. .,
3 _ 04 �_i .. .,/r0 3 1/r. `f MILEACE (01 0J0 Or0 -21 2., 43 00
19G .,5
NW LAW ENl EXIT '__ASS
IN`�CiCD TCTAL
197..E
WA 3_ U.NCE C_ _---RS' ,.,_.._
C3/_ ., u,'JCi OC _..� C0= 000 III 1
;4i ES ACAM
*NCICE TOTAL
-00.00
19240
49.00
16144 WA ST PATROL
03/17/C4 00100/OO E344934-CCERMAT 63: 000 OCO S89 --2 32 69
Z4.00
CONCEALED WEAPON
_ti JC.C.: TCTAL
240
E344937-EAR_E E3- 000 000 599 -e 52 89
....00
CONCEALED "WEAPCN
INVOICE TOTAL
24.00
19241
352.00
-6152 WALDRON s CCMPANY
23/17/04 00/00,CC WR04-57 001 000 000 579 :- i-
'HUMAN RESCIIRCES
CNVC-CE T_i.+L
City of Modina
Clicck RcUistcr
\[arch 31. 2004
�_1�Sc6
hick
VENDOR
N.T+>"E
..CONS
,.IIC1l t- C
Amount
NUMB ER
.S.7:,UR
_
__,
-8f'.,�
AMER:CAN eMBP - �0' �i SE.R';_CE
.,-/a i 4
Ocr 00, 00
i4APCH 3 2C04 wl )CC OOC 575 8.,
__ 06
,..-,.
SEiRTS
INVOICE TOTAL
350
AC �'NE./ACCUPC
J�iJ4/L4
00 COj90
-931 9CL 000 000 ,12 C
41 =L
19245
c, cam.=�
CCMPTE* aEP7TCES
-3/2 4/04
1 OOC 002 -2' 2C
42 ._
4-5
t
277
A-&:
1VV0ICE TOTAL
y=
,�.00
_..:15
AV EI�ET 'd E3 SC L.,TTCNC
G3/-4/C4
0,00/00
635i OD1 000 000 s-B
_
-CM_.__d NAME SE'' CP CHG
11'JC-CE 73TAL
90.00
18063
E 4 B SHREDDING, LLC
0-'/24/04
GO/70
8539 OC1 000 C00 513 -0
4' CO
SHREDD'_`IG SP:R".=DES
:NVO -ZE TCTAL
_.5B1.00
12''I
3EL=.EVU_: OFFI= 3_:...
AO2D PRC-ESSING
_.`.P=—" TO_.AL
OE
0 -4/OS
00/C0/00
4i_5'04 CBEN 001 C00 DOD 525 SC
41 0�
,. 3243
«-CO
'750
B=,E'J:, e., C TY
EP CONE
ItivOICE 'TOTAL
40,5/0.4 CDERMP.T 001 OCO CO0 52-
EP CCNF
I?IL'pI�E .O..,_
19249
14i.45
2866
CEDAR ..ROVE G M'C8'_''N3
53,12./04
COO 0 O 542
TCFSC I.
=N`JO10E 70-AL
31'00
CHE.`cN
i31=4/C4
._ CC, OC
5ye3C6d0 i41;3 001 O0C CC' _ -_
32 13
MEDINA STREET DEPT
INVOICE TCTAL
2__
-,557r45
181I0
CHEVRCN (POLICE;
03/24/04
OC/C3/00
78983)538-403 001 000 300 521 20
32 CO
POLICE ALTOMCBILES
INVOICE TOTAL
19252
24.82
3305
CODE PLBL:SH1NG Co.
C3/24/04
CO/00/00
22023 001 300 300 518 -..
4DC
M ED:NA MS:4iCI P.4L CODE
:NVOICE TOTAL
2202- 001 000 000 518 10
41 CO
MEDT_NA MUNICIPAL CCDE
INVOICE TOTAL
Lam, ;
532 _2
2,582.42
5.05
75
'ICC
2- 3
34'_.4
241.46
523.
55''45
55'7 43
483.33
483.�G
.,_.44
141.44
lb 4/1?/04
Cite of \tcdina
C11Cck R,22IStOl-
Larch 31. 2004
��1CiE:
' �1JC�
�• •_���
VEV➢OR
d 11111'CI
.AILI`mit
ND*1BER
VENDCR NKgc
HMi
'r am: __ ...._
..00II`1'C
1-253
9C.25
3385
CR'-'STAL SP=4GS
-3i24/C4
00C 000 ,�
24
-''0
394142-.5
OO'. 1100 O0C __8 .,,
_-
00
6=.4_
w;,'_ ER
_:",O10E TOTAL
--.41
245.00
1805J
CSPA La_ERLOCAL
»i24/J_
20C4 TRA:NINC
OC: CCU OJ0 521 2C
4�
....
..-_..,,
--AIL ICV C.-.. `5
_....
I`IVCTCE TOTAL
2
-5
17..(i8
34C5
DAVEY TREE EX_Et7
03/24/C4
..0 'O Ci OC
96'��32d
CO —CO COO --76 b.,
4_
04
_14-_e
ME 11 T BEACH: P;-.RK
INVOICE '-7AL
59.64
4640
ENA COURIERS INC
C3/24/04
3C/CO/C0
7 E24SS
OCl 90C 003 521 23
c2
.,.
_`
4
POL=CE-COURIER SERVICES
:NVCICE TOTAL
59.64
327.11
18092
EWIRCNME.NT CONTROL
4i 04
/00/0C
4_01560
301 OCO 00C 5i8 3C
-a
OC
11d
.>4
H LEG SUH L—ES
4101J95
001 00C 000 5_a 30
-.o
E LAG SIJP�LIES
INVOIC- TC^AL
_.._._.
473339
OC1 On 030 1, .'l
-18
:C
o95.JJ
ELDG MA:NTNAVC-
INVCICC TCTAi,
595.00
'9258
922,21
18112
E'-ER-M.. ARK, LC
3.24/Od
C ',O/CO
_3C22
001 100 COD 121 2.
19
.0
92I
.I.
5JC
IWCICE Tn=
922
2.
1?._2
527C
FINANCIAL ION✓_-L_ANTS _.T--PNA'"
,3 '. 4/24
�L,0� J0
5366
00, C00 0.,0 �z_ 22
43
1.
:�.-2
PCL=.-E A-=0
INVOICE TG^&L
53.-Z
L 26C
:86.28
5875
GRAINGER INC, WW
03/24/C4
20/IO/00
754-I47373-7
001 000 CIO 576 80
__
00
1-,9.53
Sti PPLIES
IWOICE TOTAL
i79.53
754-965291-0
00: C00 000 576 30
_=
00
6-'�
SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL
6.
Z.
1,801-11
18113
HAR_NDEN rO INC, C.R.
03/24/04
CO/00/00
2952
I03 000 000 589 CC
49
1C
967.35
TREES
IWCICE TOTAL
1b 4/12/04
Cite of -Ma Tina
Cli.—A Kcvistar
March 31.
2004
PACE
Am01111[
Ntm.a.a
A-E�� m NLMBER
297? =C3 CPC D00 589 OD
+,
_,
254.9+
PP.EES
CC_=.L
2' 4
98
;C00 -03 O 0 000 5S9 CO
TREES
=N�iC=CE -AL
6345
HC3=ZC9
.i24/74
A CC/�0
a '0 101 O00 „c0 42
I N'IO LCE JTA:
--5.--
- .3
46.
..
.308
HRS USA
3/24/C4
'0/00/-
Z2 ^852 C01 30C OCJ 5_8
_.__.
A:AP 6 PORT .ion
= —ill ICE
_H5319 102 000 C00 5:2 �;
_y
OD
569.d:
CLERK-17' LCD MONITOR
8sCO
KC F_NANCE
02,24/04
r 2.'Z2 301 00C 00° 519 90
=_
30
143-2
-Y
143.27
4 n QTR'C3 :,:QCOR A!,
NVGI _� 'CTAL
:43._
265
6,607.08
8626
KIRKIAND MNN L _^PAL CSUTT
03/24/04
`O/00/00
'F804ME_^ OO' 009 00 -_._ 5C
1C
,444
IUN:-IPAL =-7R: 7E2S
EEBO4MFD OC_ 000 000 5-_1 30
5I
Z_
2,162
S8
MUNICPA:, CCU— FEES
:NVC:CB T—AL,
c,_.,
-D5
03/24/C4
C :;'S
18941' _00 000 000
�j
4,�_3.
...
. .. o
4,Ci3.40
dUST2M S_RNALS, :NC_
P RGLA SEP. .._
=N,'OTC. TOT,--
4,3:_.4G
_cl6'
oI.00
8778
LcIgn .;ACRIE BR .N SGN ,'=REA S'Trz �3 �4/02/CO/00
2004 DUES 001 C00 Ov0 521 't.1
19
Y..
65.CC
. ,,.,: _E-CRLT1i MCE35R
N`:3:C- _. ,L
30
18114
LMI NCTA.RY SER`7:C'
24/04
0C/00/10
2034 CP_UM OOi C00 DU 521 :.
.9
4C
_06.30
:9°66
_
NCTAR7 BOND 9EES
:NVCICE TCTAI,
10,
33
-9269
90-46
9326
MARATHON COMMUNICATIONS INC
03/24/C4
CO/CO/CO
MAR 'C4 101 DOC 000 518 I0
42
OC
90.40
TELEPHCNE ICNC DISTANCE
INVC:CE TOTAL
90
.46
192"G
3,154.32
10460
O'BR:EN & ASSOCIATES INC.,
P.S 03%24/04
03/00/.DO
14598 001 00O 000 512 50
41
1-
:,154.32
PROS--=TINC ATTORNEY
INVOICE TOTAL
3,�54.=2
_,2._
„ 299.31
-.07C0
OTAK
33/24/04
CC/GO/CO
03C4366Z9 332 000 900 595 32
63
SF:ORELINE/DCCK RESTORE
jb 4/1 -'/O4
Citric of Modina
Check Ke�istcr
March 3 t
_ 2004
PAGE
i1dC%
Cilz Ci.
JENDCR
--GUN-
'Llulll)Ci
NUMBER
V=E EGR NAME
.SCtiEC
EL
.... : ,_.
d _
-..•_
.-�;IIn N➢�
:NVGICE -G1'AL
5,79Y
2
336.51
._020
?ACID.. ,C _CPSC:LS, :NC.
03,24/C4
7`)Ci':'0
12n4-
-01 C00 CCO 542
„
MC_C'_-_
NVO_GE TOTAL
335-5.
o23 00
11830
PCSTAGE/RESERVE ACCOUNT
C3/24/04
r /,'-CO
MAR'C4
OCl 300 00� =18 :�
-:.
,..
�,OCC
IO
"CSTAGE
:NVCICE TOTAL
-
_,_.00
ll4_
.RT_TE, .iCHN v ATTORNEY AT
LAC3%24/C4
1�'70/CO
`_
'.2
COl OG0 000 5_2 �3
41
2C
2, 1Z'.-00
_-
�_
PUBLIC CEEEND ER
INVOICE TOTAL
_,-... .00
4'a3 .29
113CO
PUGET SO:IDID ENERSy
24iC4
:�, 00
MAR'C6A
101 :00 000 ��2 S_
4_
3,
- 463.29
ST_R--.7.- TIGHTS
_NVOICE TC:AL
-2,24/04
I:C/CC
MAR'C4A
O(`1 000 O00 516 i0
.2
C0
-...51
., OOS 55
'_1820
QWES"'
TELEPHnNE.S
INVOICE TOTAL
-52.6--
MAR JIB
col 000 000 518 :J
42
T�
6-.--
PA'c 7rw-NE
=NVCrGE 2,_AL
MAR'C4C
OCi C00 C00 518 10
_..
_Li ISCN
iNVCICP, TOTAL
1-2-.,,-
G___ ISDN
:NVOIC3 '"OTAL
79--»
--�,
23.25
12 C2S
3AL'IC SEAC< CORP0RA7ION
03/24/C4
03,30'CO
2G0655
C01 000 0.5 2: 2C
48
E4UI7 MAINTENANCE
TCIAL
92?B
648.51
12087
REED, SANDY
03/24/C4
00/00/CO
2004 WMCA CCNF
001 000 000 SLB 1C
43
CO
648.�_
ROTE::/MEALS']M-LEAGE
-IF CICE TOTAL
643.5'i
_,....
2a-.55
'2685
SCHULZE, DOUGLAS J
03/24/04
00/CO/00
20C4 NW REG CONF
COl OCO 000 5. lC
43
CO
2_ „
55
HCT--L/MEALS
INVOICE TOTAL
22.-55
.926C
99.30
18115
SHILCG LTD
01/24/04
09/00/00
PCPCX144
CO1 000 000 521 20
3:
40
99.30
PUMP
ILNC:CE -0-AI,
99.--
1923:
38.39
13405
SIRCHiE 9INGERPRINT LABORATORY 03/24/04
00/CO/00
033"436
001 00C COO 5._ 2D
41
,,
38.39
SUPP:,:ES
1 b 4/ 12/04
Cite of Medina
Chcck Rc�!iStcr
March 31. 2004
1 I1�CIi
{
l IKC}C
4 7 I-N
�lilt'ILNL
VENDOR
hE
•� F
-c.,__,
..__.. .NO.
_ Cl ,JvEET
__,..
n -'-
NGM3ER
.NLCR _'r
..
=NVC7CS .CTAL
_--
23
12560
SOS DATA S=R'. ICES /:'�
0_: 24/24
�0/SO
i693
O01 C00 CCO �_6 1C
NEWSLET77R
_eC4C".
�,._ C00 OGG 51S 10
49
3C
- .�-...
NEWSL-- 7 TER
7Sg.;?0
14630
UL`AMA:
33/24/G4
0 00/7C
069396
'Di 000 "Do _c_ 2.
__
SJ
7`-
A!!M'.It; I T1CN
_NVCICE TOTAL
�56.00
9284
_,1
19.,�6
JN_>EPS:TY OF WASF'N1TOD!
03,'24/04
CO/CO/00
_.._.__
CO1 000 CO ._ _G
-
3,199..,
.
Cri 3N, ."LFFRci
INVOICE TOTAL
_,199.0^
_, o2H5
34.LC
19207
UTILITIES UNDERGROL'NU
0�24/64
O, 'J0/CO
4029476
101 CCC 3'� .:42 30
47
00
��.-�
EXCACATIC'4 NOT=PICATION
I`r'CICE TOTAL
_.._�
260-30
16CCO
WA FINANCE C .'CEPS ASSOC
C�/24/34
OC/03
_9-2
..._ OJ0 330 _Ell 62
43
-0
4l
A2Ad, MILE'
-Nl;CIC3 "OT.AL
4-
"C
_645
OC1 COO r;OO mil_ .3
24..._�
ADAM, M-LFS
^jVOiCE TOTAL
240-.,�.
_9207
70.10
:6090
WA ST C�.ME P4_e NT_CN
0_.24/^.4
OC /:ACC
2004 DUES
C01 000 O00 52--0
49
G-
PCL:CE —.FLM
IIN^i.^_ T.a r.L
5J-00
19288
'_8
.00
16109
WA ST DEPT O _iCENSING
'!24/34
,G!CO/C3
E34493 EARLE
631 ICJ OCO 5S9 12
�L
38
_3.00
CONCEALED AEAPCN
LWC_C� _OT-"L
_a.=.,
19269
930.00
16i44
WA ST PATROL
C3,'24/04
DC/00/00
0002/964
'Cl 000 300 �21 23
51
_.
930
ACCESS USER EEE
1W 0.CE TCTAL
930--
19290
44 C.00
16152
WALDRON y COMPANY
03/24/04
CO/001:0
WRC4-'L
001 000 OOC E_o :C
=_
CO
443.30
HUTM,AIN R_SC :,—ti C-S
INVO'_CE TOTAL
440.00
_1291
30-77
I6'_50
WASHINGTON AWARDS, INC.
03/24/04
O0/C0/CO
376:8
001 C00 000 513 10
31
JO
30.77
NAME PLATES
:NVCICE rCTAL
33...
L9292
6:-95
'_6163
WELLS MEDLNA NURSERY,INC
03/24/04
CO/CO/00
L=4fi1
OOL CCO 000 5'c 93
._
SO
.;_.96
PLANTS
1b 4/12/0 4
Cily of Modina
Chock Ko2isTor
Nlarch 31. 2004
hccl,
Cheri,
T:,...
V E_W R
iV^.!EER
7"
:iI OUllC
NLOMEW3
.cNDCR NAVE
I'TVC:CE TCTAL
''=1
06
2J1 't 7A--T:IAL
OG_ JOG COC 521 2C
__ __
37---
-
15.^0
1E05�
WSLET LA
03/ .i 04
0�
__
KNO.. ..MME" KEN
NVCI,EE TO AL
35
90
36
18020
=J AR :NEUSTPTES, _NC,
Ol/-1 4
O0'70%CC
0 8"-1C_'
101 COC OCO 542 o-
41 __
373-�-
0�01
BARR!C CSS
11TV3ICE TOTAL
3
6
_5.
i2
4E-00
EMPLOYMENT SEC.B_T'( LEPT
0 /3}/04
00/D0/00
:ST ;iTR 24
001 000 OCC 3-8 IC
C_
..
UNE.MPLCYMEN': '":..YES
:N'3CICE TOT:-.L
•�._�
9070
LOWE'S 3TSIti ICES ACC�JN'I
�./'_,04
O, CC/D1
MA@'0.;
1'J1 OCO COC 542 3G
31
S:;P P`_:_2
_
697.00
1023C
NAT'L LEASUE C CS�.ES
3,
i, ,u/0C
2C 3 4 1:ES
001 000 OOC 5-3 -J
43 20
69"%.1,
..
Z
.. _1 MEMBERSHIPS
INVO _CE TC lj"',T
�98
9,036.35
--Cl
RCHRBACL, 2 RCEEPT
0'/_-/04
2 C/J3
M.AZ'C4
00_ 000 003524
2
9,C36.91
BOILD:NG '.:._.i..:.._
:V,;CICE TOTAL
1_,924.70
12005
ROTH HILL ENG:NEERINC PARTNERS
D3/31/34
0O/OC/00
=E3'J4
001 009 C00 524 5J
4_ --
0 362.-5
ENGINEERING=CNSJ7LTA.1;7
-i_ -4
C01 JOT 130 576 20
41 G.,
96:.95
ENGIN-_-ERINS CCNSl'.,'AN7
TOT.A_
, 824,'..
_D,635.
_`0
15400
WINES P.S, KIRK R-
O.,i n-/04
7, C
MP.R'04
001_ 000 DOC CIS 2-3
41 10
1 2 6--1
nJ
`___ A—CRNEC
:NVC IIE TOTAL
1G,'o35.5C
-RE.ND TOTAL
_4 946.3'
1b 4/ 12/04
ITEM F - 4
y of ME�/�
C; CITY OF MEDINA
City Manager's Office
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
w .rne nsa-wa, ov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 29, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager
RE: City Council Guidelines Manual
RECOMMENDATION: By motion, adopt City Council Guidelines Manual.
POLICY IMPLICATION: The City Council Guidelines Manual serves as a resource for members of
the City Council to find information regarding the laws, rules and procedures, and guidelines related to
performance of their duties.
BACKGROUND: During the March 22, 2004 City Council Study Session the City Council
approved the City Council Guidelines and directed the City Manager to place the Guidelines Manual on
the April 12, 2004 Consent Agenda. The changes directed by the City Council have been made, which
include:
• Changed title of document from City Council Protocol Manual to City Council Guidelines Manual;
• Deleted Article 10, except for Section 10.01;
• Changed Section 10.01 to a review every four years rather than every two years.
An updated copy of the City Council Guidelines will be provided to each member of the City Council for the
Council Resource Binders.
,'°' 7701-� MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jeffrey T. Chen, Chief of Police
CITY OF MEDINA
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
MARCH 2O04
Felony Crimes
March
2004
Aggravated Assault
0
Robber\r
0
Sexual Assault,Rape
0
Bury=larv, Residential
2
Drug Violations
I
PorgerviFraud
1
Vehicle Prowl
I
I heft (Over $250)
1
Malicious Mischief
0
Arson
0
Auto'Boat Theft
0
Possession of Stolen
0
Propert
Item H-1
YTD
YTD
Year End
2004
2003
2003
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
4
16
1
0
0
6
3
li
14
1
1
9
0
0
0
0
1
p
�
�
TOTAL 6 17
Misdemeanor March YTD
Crimes 2004 2004
Assault. Simple 0 0
Malicious Mischief 0 3
(cinder S250)
Vehicle Proa1
2
theft (Under 5250)
I
Domestic Violence
0
Minor in Possession
0
Drug* Violations
0
TOTAL
3
13
68
YTD
Year End
2003
1
2003
2
4
_'6
6
9
26
'-
3
11
0
0
3
6
0
2
;
12
23
81
Pau, c 2
Item H-1
MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jeffrey T Chen, Chief of Police
CITY OF MEDINA
MONTTMY ACTIVITY REPORT
MARCH 2O04
Accidents
March 2004
YTD 2004
YTD 2003
Year End 2003
injury
0
0
0
1
Non -Injury
0
1
5
16
TOTAL
0
1
5
17
Traffic Citations
March 2004_
YTD 2004
YTD 2003
Year End 2003
Dm ine Under Influence
16
32
20
42
*Other
20
60
65
206
TOTAL
36
92
85
248
Traffic Infractions
March 2004
YTD 2004
YTD 2003
Year End 2003
Speeding
54
144
81
406
Parkin-
3
20
-9
184
**Other
67
148
144
S;2
TOTAL
114
312
256
1122
Traffic Warnings
March 2004
YTD 2004
YTD 2003
Year End 2003
TOTAL -
294
691
583
2635'
Calls for Service
March 2004
YTD 2004
YTD 2003
Year End 2003
blouse Watch Checks
62
178
1213
424
False Alarms
27
�9
68
387
Assists -Citizen
73
4�6
217
Assists-FirerMedic
II
19
Suspicious Circumstances
I
4
15
Property Found!l.ost
4
6
4
18
Animal Complaints
0
1
1
Missing Person
0
0
0
kVarrant Arrests
5
'O
17
68
*:`:`Other
9
l�
60
TOTAL
138
355
324
1332
* DWLS: Fail to Transfer "title:
No License
** Expired Tabs_ No insurance:
tail to stop: Defective
Fquipment
*** Verbal Domestic: Vandalism:
Civil Dispute:
Disturbance
Item H-1
a1 MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Town of 5 Jeffrey T. Chen, Chief of Police
Hunts P0111 �, TOWN Or HUNTS POINT
� MONTfMY ACTIVITY REPORT
MARCH 2O04
Felony Crimes
March
Year To Date
Year To Date-
Year End
2004
2004
2003
2003
Burglar%. Residential
0
1
0
Forgery (Identity Theft)
0
0
3
Vehicle Prowl
0
0
l
d
Theft (Over S250)
0
0
0
;
Auto.Boat Theft
0
0
1
2
TOTAL
0
1
5
16
Misdemeanor
March
Year To Date
Year To Date
Year End
Crimes
2004
2004
2003
2003
Assault, SimPle
0
0
0
0
Malicious Mischief
0
p
0
2
(UnderS?>0)
y
Vehicle Prowl
0
0
Theft (Cinder S250)
0
1
0
Domestic Violence
0
0
0
0
Minor in Possession
0
1
0
0
Dru._ Violations
0
0
1
1
TOTAL
0
2
3
7
PauC
Item H-1
MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jeffrey T. Chen, Chief of Police
Town of
TOWN OF HUNTS POINT
Hunts Point MON1'HIy ACTIVITY REPORT
MARCH 2O04
Traffic
March
" Year To Date
Year To Date
Year End
Citations
2004
2004
2003
2003
Drivini= Under Influence
3
Accidents
0
0
0
0
*Other
1
14
1 1
67
TOTAL
4
19
13
72
Traffic
March
Year To Date
Year To Date
Year End
Infractions
2004
2004
2003
2003
Specdin,
9
10
16
68
Parkin;
0
2
3
7
**Other
16
61
i 1
306
TOTAL
25
73
70
281
Warnings
March
Year to Date
Year to Date
Year End
2004
2004
2003
2003
Traffic
54
161
12�
634
TOTAL
54
161
125
634
Other Calls
March
Year To Date
Year To Date
Year End
for Service
2004
2004
2003
2003
house Watch Checks
2
12
18
False Alarms
6
18
19
91
Assists -Citizen
?
10
7
7
Assists -Fire Medic
1
4
10
19
Suspicious Circumstances
0
1
3
Property— Lost'Found
0
0
1
3
Animal Complaints
0
0
0
0
Warrant Arrests
1
4
1
�0
`**Other
3
3
10
TOTAL
18
54
49
201
DWLS: Fail to "I lanster Title:
No License
* Ftpired Tabs: No insurance;
Fail to stop:
Detective Equipment
*** Verbal Domestic; Harassment: Civil Dispute: Arson
ITEM H - 2
CITY OF MEDINA
Development Services
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
wwvv.medina-wa.9ov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 6, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Joseph Gellings, AICP, Planning Director
RE: Monthly Development Services Report
1247 Evergreen Point Road Trees — The City Manager's Activity Report in this packet contains a
discussion of whether the pre-existing trees on this site have been adequately protected from the
construction activities and the code ramifications.
Medina Elementary School Replacement — Development Services staff have been in regular contact
with the Bellevue School District project managers. The progress of their planning and design effort
appears to be on -schedule relative to the original plan of starting the permit application process in May.
Because the public comment period — through the SEPA and special use permit process — will not officially
start until permit application, staff have not acted to influence any design aspects of the project. At the
same time, staff believe the school district is responding to comments emanating from the community in
recent months.
Cell Tower at Evergreen Point Road and State Route 520 — Early last week contractors for T-Mobile,
without a building permit, erected the cell tower that has been proposed for the northeast side of the
Evergreen Point Road overpass of S.R. 520. Based on recent Ordinance No. 772 (clarifying that
construction of a right-of-way structure requires a building permit), staff felt the need to issue a "Stop Work
Order" to put T-Mobile representatives and work crews on notice of this requirement. While staff is
disappointed by location and tower height variances previously granted for this project, the main objective
in requiring a building permit is public safety. The building permit review process allows the Building
Official to review the final foundation and structural details, which staff believe to be very important given
the close proximity of the tower to Evergreen Point Road, a bus stop, and a well -traveled pedestrian
walkway. Earlier today, staff met with T-Mobile's attorney and reached an agreement that will involve
building permit application by T-Mobile very soon and an expedited review by the City.
On a parallel track to this building permit matter, the City has yet to see the outcome of their appeal of the
special use permit and variance decisions. Any construction effort by T-Mobile in the interim is at the risk
of future removal or alteration expenses should the City win this appeal.
Planning Commission Meeting Recap — There were two items on the Planning Commission's April 6.
2004 agenda. The first one was a public hearing on the Cascade Trust guesthouse construction
ITEM H - 2
mitigation plan. Only the applicant and staff provided testimony. Per the staff recommendation, the
Planning Commission approved the proposed construction mitigation plan as submitted.
The second item on the agenda was broadening the scope of the commission's recommendation on side
yard setback changes. The commission reviewed staff's compilation of five case studies of small lot
owners who struggled to forge their desired projects to Zoning Code side setback regulations. Their final
conclusion was that the primary side -setback -related problems faced by small lot owners could be
alleviated by revising the Zoning Code's reconstruction threshold — the magnitude of remodeling project
that is actually considered a new house and required to be fully code -compliant.
2
ITEM H - 8
of M���,
CITY OF MEDINA
City Manager's Office
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
www.medina-wa,aov
CITY MANAGER'S ACTIVITY REPORT
DATE: April 6, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager
RE: City Manager's Activity Update
AWC Board Elections — The Association of Washington Cities will be accepting applications from
elected officials for open AWC Board positions. The deadline for submitting an application is April 29,
2004. Although District #7 is not up for election this year, the At -Large #2 position is open. This position is
for an elected official from a Western Washington City with a population < 5,000. Information about the
AWC Board and a Background Information Sheet are attached. If interested, complete the Information
Sheet and return it to AWC by April 29, 2004.
Meeting With Bellevue Mayor/City Manager — The April Points Mayors' Breakfast included a discussion
with Mayor Connie Marshall and City Manager Steve Sarkozy from the City of Bellevue. Topics of
discussion included transportation, regional forums, municipal courts, fire services and options for
developing a more collaborative and productive relationship. Bellevue's representatives were very
receptive and welcomed the opportunity to continue the discussion. A follow up meeting will be arranged
for the purpose of discussing Bellevue's legislative agenda and opportunities for the Points Cities and
Towns to benefit from Bellevue's legislative staff research/reports as well as joining their efforts when we
share positions on issues.
T-Mobile Wireless Facility — A Stop Work Order was recently issued for the T-Mobile project at SR-520
and Evergreen Point Road. The Order was issued as a result of T-Mobile's facility construction without a
building permit. A meeting with T-Mobile's legal counsel was held on April 6'° for the purpose of resolving
this matter. T-Mobile has agreed to submit a building permit application and scheduled a meeting with
Joseph Gellings and Bob Rohrbach for April 7'h to identify all permit application requirements. The City
has committed to an application turnaround of 7 days, provided a complete application is submitted.
Currently, T-Mobile has outstanding fees and charges in excess of $9,000, which will also need to be paid
before a building permit is issued.
April Meeting Schedule
April 6 - Planning Commission Meeting - 7:00 p.m.
April 12 - City Council Meeting - 7:00 p.m.
April 19 - Park Board Meeting - 7:00 p.m.
April 20 - Hearing Examiner Meeting - 7:00 p.m.
April 26 - City Council Study Session - 7:00 p.m.
ITEM H - 8
1247 Evergreen Point Road Trees — As a result of concerns expressed about damage to trees, Ian
MacCallum of Trees for Life (certified arborist), was contacted to look at the trees in question associated
with the Swanson development at 1247 Evergreen Point Road. Ian was actually in Medina on another
issue when he was contacted and offered to look at the trees right then and there and provide Shel Jahn
with an assessment - free of charge provided he didn't have to prepare a report. Shel met Ian on site to
look at all of the trees in question. Here are his observations:
- He stated that without having actually observed the root structure on the trees when the wall
foundation(s) excavated and the rockery was constructed, he couldn't definitively tell if the trees
may have been damaged, or if damaged, to what extent. However, from what he could observe,
he was more inclined to believe that all of the trees in question would probably do okay under the
circumstances, although no guarantee.
He also noted that different species of trees react quite differently to any 'outside trauma" with
Hemlocks and Doug Firs not doing very well when 'stressed." and Cedars being much more
resilient and can take quite a bit of "shock" - and many of the larger trees which may have been
impacted by the construction of the walls are cedars.
Some extenuating factors he observed were that additional shrubs and small trees have been
planted as part of the development landscaping plan and several of these were planted within the
probable reach of several of the main tree root structures - thus, when the additional landscaping
vegetation went in, some additional root damage to the primary trees may have also occurred -
but again, no absolutes. He also saw the primary power connection to the residence and
speculated that if an underground power line was installed as part of the project, this could also
have caused some root damage. On the other hand, the power connection could have been the
same as was supplying the original on site residence, thus no extra boring may have taken place
during this current development.
- Ian also stated that at this point he didn't see any immediate signs of stress in any of the trees in
question. He also noted that if there was root damage which would eventually cause any tree to
be injured, we would see this in the form of browning of the needles at least by August of this
year and most definitely within the next two years. He thought this would be quite obvious if it
were to occur.
- Ian also noted that a general rule of thumb is that if 33% of the root structure is cut for most trees,
you are running a pretty significant risk of killing the tree, although he has seen trees survive and
do fairly well when a greater percentage is cut - but again, this is often species dependent. He
also noted that he typically tries to advise that no more than 25% of the root structure be cut if
you want to help ensure a tree is going to survive.
- On a side note, Ian stated that in his opinion the trees along this section of right-of-way were way
too thick. Too many trees competing for water, nutrients, and light. He felt that the area should
be thinned out for the overall health of all of the remaining trees. As you may recall, we have
already allowed them to remove 5 smaller trees, which were either fairly dead or dying - and Ian
is now suggesting even more should be removed for the health of the remaining trees.
Finally, Ian suggested we document the health of the trees with pictures and then use these over
time to determine if any real damage has occurred.
Kristin Hoffman is going to capture the current status of the trees with pictures. However, the question of
whether or not we could note in the final landscape acceptance letter that these trees were under
observation and if problems develop over the two years subsequent to the property development,
removal and mitigation could be required. This will take some interpretation of our existing code, possibly
a legal review. Kristin is also keeping a list of suggested improvements to the tree code and has added
clarification of this issue or this kind of circumstance as something to be discussed when we get around
to a review/update of the code.
a
ITEM H - 8
Permit Performance Report — The March Permit Performance Report is attached.
Citizen Action Request Log — The March CAR Log is attached for Council information.
Customer Surveys — Although more than 50 customer surveys have been distributed since January, we
have only received four completed surveys. Of the four received, ratings were. 2 — excellent; 1 — good;
and 1 — poor. The "poor" rating was specifically directed toward the temporary office outside city hall —no
other questions were completed on the survey.
Based upon your most recent service,
Poor Fair/Average
Good
Excellent
how would you rate your overall
satisfaction with the City of Medina?
I 1
1
2
Do you feel that your waiting time was:
! Too Long
Reasonable
s than
Expected
1
2
How often do you interact with the City
Weekly
Monthly 1-6 X annually
Other
of Medina?
1 1
11
Did Not Meet
Eectations
p
Met Exceeded
Expectations Expectations
ectations
NIA�
Employee
cared about & understoo
T
myneedncens
2 1
Service delivery was time) /responsive
12
Employee was able to assist me or
direct me to appropriate source-
2 1
Employee was courteous and friend)
2 1
Employee was qualified,
knowledgeable & well informed
1
2
Transaction was handled in a
1
professional manner
1
2
Policies & processes were easy to
follow
and/or clearl explained
2
1
Accessibility (facility, staff, hours)
2 1
3
Item H - 8a
Applications Received 1/1/04 to 12/31/04
Decisions made in -
more than 120
calendar days
120 calendar
days or less
not issued yet
Total
Accessory Dwelling Units
0
Antennas and Satellite Dishes
0
Boundary Line and Lot Adjustments
0
Bulkhead/pier
2
1
3
Clearing & Grading
0
Conditional Use
0
Demolition
0
Environmental Impact Statement
0
Fence/Walls
1
1
Final Short Plat
0
Fire Suppression
1
Horne Occupation
0
Land Use Approval Amendment
0
Minor Land Use Actions
0
Landscape Vegetation
0
Major Commercial Project
0
Mechanical
12
6
18
Medium Commercial Project
0
Minor Clearing & Grading
0
Minor Commercial Project
0
New Single Family Residence
1
4
5
Pools & Spas
0
Preliminary SEPA
0
Preliminary Short Plat
0
Reconstruction
0
Rezone
0
Right of Way Use
12
Rocke
3
Rocke Repairs
1
Shoreline Management
0
Sin le Family Additions &Remodels
3
Single Family Interior Alterations
2
Single Family Repairs
%2-
2Tenant
Improvements
0ariance
1Total
0
520.0%
%
0
O
J
H
W
O
W
z
O
H
U
Q
z
W
N_
v
a
O
o
C)
y
Y tN
O
N
CD
N
p
N
R
O
LO
N
U
M
�
m
.) o
3
o
c`a
N
0
R c
0
d 0
0
�O w
O(
m n
a fy0 O
a m
Q
L
c c
L c y V
Q p
a1 to a+ a)
L O
@ 7 .O O R
f�
U
a a
m
3
7
N
O a) c
c
p
O a) O) O
CL �
c>
m O
V
N
L L)
m a)_
U a V
N c U c=
m
E
Y � -
n o
N d w
c a
3 E m a
@ m n
a(D O '3
°>' x E
n m
N O N C
,o) @@
o R
p L J U)
Oc 0 O .'
a) p n
U Y
U -U N U
>, m
m N L
cn C
a
S] a) .O+
m n 0
a) E c Q
U d@
N
7 �O t
p)
C m
L..
_ .0.
@ 0 a O R R
U@ Om O
«. `O
a in c w
Q 3 Q)
U m Z j
N c A c
D
CR
co
a
=c�
a
Lm
-6
c
....0
!
Q
m
C
@
a
Uc
3
mo
L o
C E
m+O CD
m )
'a
_No
m
U
wU)E
�
c 0
=
i
O
R
LD) R
'L aO
�E
am
fn
'c
c -O N
U m W
a)
O r U) O.
a) a) 0
-
()
c U G) Q U R
U c m
(D U(D a)
U N N
(�
T
N Q
i M
n'c
Om
R >.
m +'
C O
C .-- 0)
cn to R=
w o m 3
E Y
C R
o Q c
a)
@ a o
m U)
N c U y
y6 0 0
a o
U O m
U `o
.0 f0 y
L �'
N O O '�
°' 3
a
O m�
.U)
c
c N 3
c
Q
° a)
=
@ n
o
c
a) d
m o) ( y C U
M W
@ 3 c o
d
U
aai �
CO
3 c
Y
3 '�
Q
� -O
c mL.
U j`
.�
O
Q m
C
Q) m a)
a a)
C U
o c w _O
S
-- m e
n
7> ••
O
U (6
o >
E-P N a c
a)
3
U
m
is :° w
° C�
o' c y =
_0
�_ °
° c .�
> acn
a) W
0 a
E
_
C) N a 3 Y
m E@
3
C 0 i a)
C� fcp
U�� 3 t C
c U�
�
c ao
E 0
0=
3
m ;°
L N o
N.
M v)
m
O mT
oU
c
cc C
>
R
UCA
0 0 0
O
mU
O U O aR
p
O C
O W O D
U W
U d
co L 3
O >,U
U U nU2'-Uco
O
UZU n
c a
a
ar
n
(1)
u
o
U)
(1)
m
E C
C
>
>
>
U
U
U
r
m
U
Un
n
O
OQ N
m Q
>
>
>
)
d
d
d
�
U
V)
N
CT
c
C
7
m m@
m
@
(1)
m
n
a)CL
a
E
E
E
o
E
a)
�
O
U
U U
C)
p
v
p
C)
p
UD
o
v
p
v
O
v
o
a
y .>
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
R d
N
N
(N
N
N
N
N
V
a)
LO
0
CDO
Of
Cl)
c7
c7
CO
co
N
c7
(`1
(M
N
0
m
w
m
a
0
O
J
W
0
W
Z
O
U
Q
Z
W
_N
H
V
O
0
N
C)
U
o
Q(D
o
m N
0 O
N
�
U
N
a
a
O w
a
o c
N R
Q tm
O
Y
N
C
V O
C C
.L
V
O CD 0
tCo f6
C
CD 0
d
(6 Q7
Q Q)
C.1 `
@ > O
9
z 3
O
> Q
M Q
U
00 d
m
N
3
Q)
(D a
U y
c U
E
3
0° m
w
o
E
O O
.0 i
w '0
(n
C
16 '1
O N
'N a 3
d y
L U
o
o N
wo
U m
(D
O O
C
QQ)
''
C O
OU @
o a
Cl rL
N
a 3
O a
V) a)
y
a)
O 0
vNi N
w a w
C OU
CD a
N (6
Y
.Q C
Q O
N> N
O N
d
i� 9
Q Q� c
i 7
Q 3 a
a s c
C m>
Q
C L
U c
a�
E 3 w
N r
c
m
�
E C
C
Q-
N
Q
in
U
Y
C
N
a
7 Cl
C�
C
Q
U
Q)
U)
d
O
O
Y .>
Q U
�
N
N
ASSOCIATION OF
WASHINGTON CITIES
''i-, ,, d,K.I �.
'—tj�d '., 5 985Gt 131,
T-,',l E,e„ ar)a,
3�n.,i3 0'40
April 2. 2004
A'vNf'C OFFICER AND DIRECTOR ELECTIONS
TO: Mayors and Councilmembers
FROM: Stan Finkelstein, Executi-e Director
SUBJECT: ARC Officer and Director Elections
Would you Like to serve on the A'WC Board of Directors' If you are an elected official from an
AWC Board District that has an open position, you are eligible to be a nominated candidate.
Simply complete the attached Background Informatio❑ Sheet and return it to AWC by April
29, 2004.
Weesrte. r::dw.aw,n etorq
The AWC Nominations Comm ttee will review your application, schedule an inter-°iew with
you, and consider your nomination. Inten'iews will be scheduled for Tuesday. June 15 in Ocean
Shores. City and town officials will elect AWC's officer and director positions during their
annual business meeting on Friday, June 18 in Ocean Shores,
OPEN AWC BOARD POSITIONS
As directed in the AWC Bylaurs, the Nominations Comnuttce must compile a list of potential
candidates for each of the following AWC officer and director positions. Follo�+h7g is a list of
open Board positions up for election this year, the individuals currently holding those positions,
and their intentions to run again.
OPEN POSITION
INCUMBENT
TNCU.%lBEV—f
1\TEN-f IONS
President
Tom Moak, Councilmember. Kennewick
autornadc to Past
Vice President
Mary Place, Councilmember, Yakima
President
intends to run
District -2
Carol Moser, Councilmember, Richland
intends to run
District -4
Kim Owen, Councilmember. Union Gap
intends to nm
District -6
Mark Foutch, R'Iayor. Olympia
intends to run
District `S
Mike McKinnon, Mavor, Lynnwood
intends to run
District-l0*
Bill Baarsrna, Mayor,_Tacoma
intends to run
District -12
Mike Shepherd, Councilmember. Bremerton
not runnimT
District =13
Pam Carter, Councilmember, Tukwila
intend to run For
District =14
Bob Rvan. Councilmember. Belling=ham
ice Pre.ident
hntends to run
At -Large #I (Western)
Kathryn Quade, Councilmember. Poulsbo
intends to rum
At -Large ,=2(-Western, < 5,000
pop)Joan Sharp. Councilmember. Carnation
intends to run
At-Large-)(Fastern)
Rebecca Francik, Councilmember, Pasco
intends to run
At -Large -4 (Eastern, < 5.000
pop)Barbara Harrer. Mavor, Harrah
intends to run
*District = l0 (Tacoma) is a single -city districts. This position is filled by the Tacoma Cu-,
Council.
'.NOMINATION'S CONINIITTEE PROCESS
The 2004 Nominations Committee will meet on Friday. May 7 to begin the process of nominating
candidates for the open officer (president and vice president) and director positions.
The Nominations Committee will meet again on Tuesday, June 1 i during the AWC annual
conference in Ocean Shores to interview potential candidates and formulate the final list of
nominated candidates*_ The final list will be submitted to voting delegates during the AWC
annual business meetfna on Friday. June IS.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ATVVC BOARD OF DrRECTORS
In addition to making policy decisions regarding AW'C activities and programs. it is the
responsibility of the Board of Directors to interpret and apply the Association's Statement of
Policv to various issues that arise during the year. The Board also provides guidance to the AWC
staff in the implementation of policies adopted by delegates during the annual business meeting.
Board members may also serve on the governing Boards of the:
• AWC Employee Benefit Trust, a multi -employer health benefit trust providing employee
benefit plans to cities and towns throughout the state.
• AWC Risk Management Service Agency, a property and liability insurance pool program.
• AWC Board Legislative Steering Committee, which meets regularly during the legislative
session to review legislation and give AWC staff guidance on current legislative issues.
Officer and Board member criteria include
1. The individual must be an elected official and, except for the Board officer and at -
large positions, be from a city or town within the given AWC Board district. A map
and listing of the AWC districts are enclosed.
2. The individual must be able to attend Board meetings, approximately four or Five
times a year, held throughout the state. Travel and related expenses incurred in
conjunction with AWC Board of Directors meetings (except the meeting held in
conjunction with the annual conference) are reimbursed by AWC.
Additional information about the AWC Board of Directors is attached. Questions concerning
Board positions and Nominations Committee procedures should be directed to Mike McCarty or
DeA nn Hartman at (360) 753-4137, toll -free 1-S00-562-S9S1, or e-mail mikerna,awcnet.org or
deannhzaawenet.org.
SF,'DH
Enclosures:
1. Background hiformation Sheet
2. AWC Board of Directors Infornration
3. Cities sorted by AWC Board Districts
4. Map of AWC Board Districts
�. Current Roster of AWC Board of Directors
*subsequent meetings may be necessary depending upon the number of candidates to be
interviewed. AWC staff will inform all candidates of the fnteryiew date and time after the filing
deadline.
D:D,T. yii�icrnu
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON CITIES (AWC)
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
March 2004
What is the AWC Board of Directors?
The Board is the governing body of the Association of Washington Cities and is
responsible for providing continuing guidance and direction to the Association's
Executive Director and staff. The AWC Board provides specific guidance regarding
legislative proposals on the basis of the AWC Statement of Policy and Resolutions
adopted at the annual business meeting by delegates from the Association of
Washington Cities' member cities and towns. The Board also reviews and adopts the
Association's annual operating budget, establishes service fees, and provides policy
direction regarding other issues of concern to the Association. Some AWC Board
members also serve on the governing board of the Association of Washington Cities
Employee Benefits Trust and the Management Committee of the Risk Management
Service Agency.
2. Who is on the AWC Board?
The Board is composed of twenty-two elected city and town officials including a
President, Vice President, Past President, fifteen directors elected from districts
throughout the state, two at -large members from cities in eastern Washington, and
two at -large members from cities in western Washington. In addition, the President
and Immediate Past President of the Washington City/County Management
Association sit on the Board as voting members.
What are the Qualifications for Board Members?
The AWC Bylaws require all AWC Board members to be elected city officials. In
the case of Board members elected from districts, the official must be from a city or
town located within the respective AWC district. As far as the at -large positions are
concerned, the western positions are filled by city officials from a city or town
located west of the crest of the Cascade Mountain range and the eastern positions are
filled by city officials from a city or town located east of the crest of the Cascade
Mountain range. The western at -large position number two and the eastern at -large
position number four must represent a city or town of less than 5,000 population.
4. What is the A«'C Employee Benefits Trust?
The AWC Employee Benefits Trust is a multi -employer benefit Trust created by the
Association of Washington Cities to make available affordable employee benefit
plans to Washington cities and their employees. The AWC Trust is an entity
separate from AWC, but some members of the AWC Board also serve as trustees of
the AWC Trust.
The AWC Trust makes available medical, dental, vision, life and long-term
disability coverage to more than 210 cities and other public entities, and covers
nearly 11,000 employees statewide.
Over please
5. What is the AWC Risk Management Service Agenev?
The AWC Risk Management Service Agency (AWC RMSA) is a non-profit,
member -owned, property and liability self-insurance pool. Like the AWC Trust,
AWC RMSA is a separate entity from AWC, but members of the AWC Board serve
as members of the AWC RMSA Board. Some Board members serve on the AWC
RMSA Management Committee which provides additional oversight and advises
the Board on RMSA activities.
AWC RMSA currently provides liability and property insurance to over 60 cities.
6. What Oualifications or Experience are Beneficial for a
Considering Serving on the AWC Board?
Board members have generally found it helpful to be acquainted with legislators
from their area, to be able to attend full -day Board meetings and special meetings as
needed, and to be generally interested in taking an active part in AWC activities
throughout the year.
7. Who Pays a Board Member's Expenses?
AWC is responsible for reimbursing Board members for lodging, travel, and
incidental expenses incurred in conjunction with attendance at AWC Board/AWC
Trust/AWC RMSA meetings. Board members are responsible for seeking
reimbursement from their own cities for participation in the AWC annual
conference, training sessions and workshops, and other AWC sponsored meetings
held at various times throughout the year.
8. When are the Board Members Elected?
Board members are elected during the business meeting at the AWC annual
conference. District positions are two-year terms (even -numbered districts are up for
election in even years and odd -numbered districts in odd years) and the at -large and
officer positions are one-year terms. The Board is authorized by the AWC Bylaws to
appoint city officials to fill the remainder of unexpired terms when vacancies on the
Board occur.
9. How are Board Members Elected?
Prior to the annual business meeting, a Nominations Committee appointed by the
AWC President solicits local officials interested in being considered for election to
the AWC Board of Directors. The Nominations Committee is responsible for
nominating local officials to be submitted to city delegates during the AWC annual
business meeting. Nominations may also be made from the floor of the annual
business meeting. The voting delegates from each city and town represented at the
business meeting cast ballots to elect members of the Board of Directors.
10. How Mav I Obtain Additional Information Regarding the ANC Board of
Directors, AWC Trust Board, and AWC RIVISA Management Committee?
Contact Stan Finkelstein, Mike McCarty or DeAnn Hartman in the Association's
office in Olympia, 1076 Franklin Street SE, Olympia, WA 98501, or call toll -free 1-
800-562-8981 or (160) 751-41 17.
G, DE4NN,N0MINATIONS`.R'HAT IS AWC BOARD DCX
Background Information Sheet
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON CITIES
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
2004
Board Position You Are Interested In (Please Check)
❑
President
❑
District #13
❑
Vice President
❑
District #14
❑
District #2
❑
At -Large #1 (Western)
❑
District #4
❑
At -Large #2 (Western <5,000 population)
❑
District #6
❑
At -Large #3 (Eastern)
❑
District #8
❑
At -Large #4 (Eastern <5,000 population)
❑
District #12
Name
City Elected Position:
Mailing Address:
Daytime Telephone:
Email
Fax
Briefly explain why you are interested in serving on the AWC Board of Directors.
2. How long have you held elective office in your city? Please list the elective offices now or formerly held.
3. Have you served on any AWC committees in recent years? If so, please list.
4. AWC Board meetings are generally held quarterly for a full day and special meetings are called as
needed. Please discuss any problems that may interfere with your regular attendance at AWC Board
meetings?
OVER PLEASE
5. One of the keys to successfully promoting the AWC legislative agenda is the willingness of AWC Board
members to contact their legislators. Please discuss your acquaintance with local legislators and the
nature of your prior and ongoing contact with them.
6. Some AWC Board members serve as trustees of the AWC Employee Benefit Trust, a multi -employer
benefit trust offering medical, dental, vision, life and long-term disability coverage to cities and their
employees. Some members serve on the Management Committee of the AWC Risk Management
Service Agency, a property and liability insurance pool program. If you have particular experience or
interest in these areas, please discuss.
7. Which of the AWC annual conference have you attended in recent years?
8. Please list the AWC training sessions, workshops, legislative conferences, and other meetings you
have attended in recent years.
9. Have you attended any meetings of the National League of Cities (NLC) or other national
organizations? If so, please list.
10. Please provide a brief personal resume of business and civic activities over the last ten years. Include any
additional information that you believe to be appropriate.
Interested members should complete and return this form to AWC by Thursday, April 29, 2004.
Mail form to the attention of Mike McCarty, Association of Washington Cities, 1076 Franklin Street
SE, Olympia, WA 98501, or FAX it to (360) 753-4896.
G:'JEN\BOARD\GENERAL\BACKGROUND INFO SHEET 2004 DOC
ITEM J - 1
CITY OF MEDINA
Development Services
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425A54.9222
,Medina-.qov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 6, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Joseph Gellings, AICP, Planning Director
RE: Regulation of Boarding House -Type Uses
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review this report and the attached
memo from the City Attorney and refrain from any code changes until the topic of home occupations can
be comprehensibly examined by the City Council.
POLICY IMPLICATION: The Zoning Code prescribes what types of land uses are and are not
allowed to existing in each land use district. Theoretically a boarding house is a different land use from
single-family residence and can be prohibited by the zoning code.
BACKGROUND: There is a home in Medina that is, arguably, being run as a boarding
house. Concerned neighbors brought this to the attention of staff and the City Council a few months ago.
At the February City Council meeting, staff agreed to investigate whether this issue could be addressed
through a simple change to the definition of "single family dwelling" found in the Zoning Code. Early in
their investigation it became clear that such a change could encounter constitutionality problems. In the
attached memo from the City Attorney, a new definition of "single family " is suggested that is clearer and
legally defensible. Unfortunately it is also a definition that would include (allow to continue) the current
specific boarding house situation reported to the City.
Since it appears that the problem cannot be solved directly — through a changed to the definition of "single-
family dwelling"— then it will have to be dealt will indirectly. An indirect restriction already contained in the
Zoning Code is that a maximum of two vehicles of employees and clients are allowed to be parked on
premises at a given time (MMC 17.64,010).
Staff have previously identified that the Zoning Code's treatment of Home Occupations could be improved
upon. After the City Council Retreat, the council may wish to undertake this project soon and be mindful of
boarding houses in the process.
MEMO
TO: MAYOR AND MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
RE: SINGLE PAMILY RESIDENCEBOARDING HOUSE ISSUES
FROM: KIRK WINES
DA"rE: APRIL 1, 2004
BACKGROUND
ITEM J — la
At a recent meeting, Joseph Gellings advised you of concerns that had been raised about the
use of a single-family residence for a boarding house.
Single family dwelling is defined in MMC 17.12.010 as follows:
"Single-family dwelling" means a detached dwelling house that is
limited in design to the accommodation of one family, its household staff
and guests.
A single-family dwelling may have accessory recreational buildings
in addition to a detached garage which may include a beach an&or
playhouse and having no more than one room plus a bathroom and
otherwise not designed for habitation.
A single-family dwelling may be occupied by the members of one
family alone, its guests and household staff: provided, however, that it is
not a violation of this title for the renter or owner of any dwelling to
provide lodging for persons not attached to the renter's or owner's family
so long as such use is incidental to the use of the dwelling for residence
purposes.
The City was advised that an individual was operating a boarding house within the City. The
estimates of the number of tenants varied. It did appear the tenants were causing parkin,
problems in the area.
The City initially looked to whether the activity could be banned as not falling within the
definition of a single-family dwelling. This could not occur- without amendment of the
definition of single-family dwelling since it specifically allows renters or owners to provide
lodging for unrelated persons `'so long as such use is incidental to the use of the dwelling for
residence purposes.' Although it may seem obvious that at some point use as a boarding
house becomes the primary, rather than an incidental use of a dwelling, fashioning a new
description of single-family dwellin, or single-family use has turned out to be more
complicated than earlier believed.
S6(iI.F I',UIILF.' IWARDIV, HOUSI`. ISS UES-I
ITEM J — 1a
EDMONDS v. OXFORD HOUSE, INC.
A signi (-scant concern arises out of a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving Edmonds,
Washington. In Edmonds v. Oxford House Inc., 514 U.S. 725 (1995) the court held an
ordinance to be invalid. The ordinance allowed families of any size in single family
residential zones but only allowed not more than five unrelated persons. The court held this
violated the federal Fair Housing Act which prohibits discrimination in housing against
persons with handicaps. When Edmonds argued that its ordinance was an attempt to cap the
number of occupants a dwelling could house, the court stated that the valid objective of
establishing maximum occupancy restrictions on such matters as square footage, was not
applicable because Edmonds only restricted the number of unrelated persons that could
reside in a dwelling. Any number of members of an extended Family could reside in a
dwelling. Edmonds was not allowed to use its code to deny a pen -nit for persons recovering
from alcoholism and drug addiction.
The City of Gig Harbor elected to look solely to the safe number of persons who could
occupy a structure. It defined family as follows:
"hamilV" means an individual or individuals domiciled together in one
dwelling unit as a single household in which the number of individuals
occupying the dwelling unit shall not exceed the occupant load of the
structure as calculated by the city in accordance with the adopted building
code.
More cities have taken an approach similar to Bellevue which defines family as follows:
Family. One or more persons (but not more than six unrelated persons)
living together as a single housekeeping unit. For purposes of this
definition and not withstanding any other provisions of this code, children
with familial status within the meaninc of Title 42 United States Code,
Section 3602(k)* and persons with handicaps within the meaning of Title
42 United States Code, Section 3602(h) will not be counted as unrelated
persons.
*(k) Children with parents, other persons having custody or the designees of either.
RECOMMENDATION
I would recommend adoption of a deCmition similar to that found in the Bellevue Code only
adding language to specify that the definition would not be used to discriminate against any
Protected class under state or federal law. Although its language is broad enough to invite
di fFering interpretations, it should also be flexible enough to allow the City to use the
exclusion for unanticipated situations which may come up in the future.
SINGI.L 1 A%11LY.430ARDISCI 1IUI S1- ISSI'ES-'
ITEM J — la
,1NOLL FAMIL) BOARDING Hol 1,F
ITEM J - 2
Of MFp v
CITY OF MEDINA
City Manager's Office
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
• w.medina-w_a,g_ov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 6, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager
RE: Intersection Sight Distance Standards
BACKGROUND: Materials were distributed in previous agenda packets (March 8, 2004). If
another copy of this material is necessary, please contact Shel Jahn.
ITEM J - 3
y of Mgtjf
CITY OF MEDINA
City Manager's Office
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
www.rnedina-wa.qo_v
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 7, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager
RE: 841h Avenue NE Tree Trimming
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize expenditure of not more than $30,000 for trimming of trees along
841h Avenue NE between NE 12th Street and NE 241h Street,
POLICY IMPLICATION: Several hazardous trees have been identified within the Poplar trees
located in the public right-of-way adjacent to 84`h Avenue NE. The City is in
the process of developing a long-term plan with Overlake Golf and Country
Club and St. Thomas Church for replacement of the trees, however, in the
interest of public safety, temporary mitigation of the hazardous condition is
necessary. The 2004 Budget will require amendment to provide
appropriation for this expenditure.
BACKGROUND: The City Council recently discussed liability exposure issues and timing of
a long-term plan for replacement of trees along 84" Avenue NE. As a
result, direction was provided to include discussion of tree trimming on the
April 12, 2004 meeting agenda.
ITEM J - 4
AGENDA ITEM SUNINIARY
FOR: Medina City Council Agenda Item: Building Code Update
Prepared By: Bob Rohrbach Date: January 30, 2004
This Agenda item asks you to adopt an ordinance which will effect a number of changes
in Chapter 15.04 of the Medina Municipal Code. Some of the changes are substantial,
and some are simply housekeeping in nature. I will attempt to provide some background
information and an explanation of the change in order to help you under the nature of the
changes and the reasons they are requested.
Section 1 proposes a rather significant change; one which we must accomplish in order to
comply with recent State legislation. As background, in 1974, the AWC, the Washington
Association of Building Officials, the architects association (AIA), and several contractor
associations petitioned the State Legislature to adopt rules which would limit the diverse
number of amendments cities and counties were making to the Uniform Building Code
(UBC), and make it mandatory to use only one edition of the code throughout the state.
This bill passed and the codes have been updated on a three-year cycle since then.
In 2000. the four code writing organizations in the U.S. jointly published a new single
version of the building code, named the International Building Code (IBC). The change
was made for many of the same reasons we insisted on one edition of the UBC in this
state in 1974. Architects, builders, property owners, and even the Federal Government
were perplexed by the differences in the codes used in different areas of the country. If
we had been able to achieve consensus in Olympia, the change to the IBC would have
happened in 2000. This was not possible, and a bill has been introduced each year since
2000, until the bill this year was approved.
NOR', we will be not only adopting a new code, but we will be skipping one edition and
going directly to the 2003 edition. This change applies to several companion codes as
w°cll, the International '_Mechanical Code, the hlternational Plumbing Code, and the
International Fire Code. There is also a simplified version of the building code, titled the
International Residential Code (IRC), which is intended for moderate to simple
residences. The existing Washington State energy code, accessibility code, indoor air
quality code, and the electrical code will stay in effect for now.
Section 2 is my recommendation to deviate from the State approved package somewhat,
due to the complexity of constriction that often goes into homes in Medina. The
Legislature has agreed that local amendments can be made, provided the new code
requirement(s) are not less restrictive than the provisions in the adopted codes. In this
case, I am proposing that for most homes built in Medina, we require the architects and
builders to use the IBC, and for the smaller, less complex homes.. they will have the
option of using the IRC. This will allow the designers and contractors to follow the code
provisions of the more comprehensive IBC, rather than hating to jump from one code to
another for more complex design elements if they started in the IRC. The architects I
ITEM J - 4
have spoken with about this approach so far, agree that this approach will simply the
design approach and help them focus on meeting one set of code requirements.
Sections 3 & 4 are adopted here individually because, even though they are included in
the codes adopted as part of the State Building Code, the Legislature did not include any
appendices in their adopting language. This gives the local jurisdictions the option of
adopting some or all of the appendices as they deem appropriate. Appendix J of the 1BC
regulates grading and excavations, while Appendix M of the UPC regulates the materials
and manner of installing drainage pipes around and under the buildings.
Section 5 is included in this ordinance because the new codes do not have permit fee
schedules included as a part of the administrative section of the codes. These new fee
schedules have been adjusted upward an average of 5% to account for the increased costs
of operating the Building Department since the last time a new code and fee schedule
were adopted, (1997 editions of the UBC).
Sections 6-14 are amendments to the Municipal Code to change the names of the adopted
codes, and to delete language that is covered in a di fferent way. These are the type of
housekeeping changes that are necessary to update our MMC language to coincide with
the new State Building Code.
Sections 15 & 16 are included in order to clarify the lanouage in the MMC regarding
outdoor burning. The Fire Code has some similar language, but it is more permissive
than was apparently intended when the MMC language was first adopted, and the Fire
Code does not recognize the local air quality limitations to outdoor burning.
Sections 17-20 are housekeeping updates of the IFC, similar to those in 6-14 for the IBC
Section 21 is a local amendment I am recommending, due to the liberal provision in the
Fire Code for storage of flammable liquids (gasoline) inside a residence. Currently, if a
residence is protected with sprinklers, the occupants can have up to 240 gallons of
gasoline stored inside for their generator or lawn mower, or any maintenance or
emergency use. For quantities larger than the 30 gallons proposed, outdoor, underground
storage tanks are the noun and have been used in several locations already.
Section 22 is an amendment that should have been included in 2001 when the Hearing
Examiner process was adopted. The intent was to do wvay with the Building Board of
Appeals and have the Hearing Examiner consider appeals of administrative rulings. This
amendment will eliminate a conflict with the sections of the adopted codes which directs
the designer or property owner to seek an appeal before the Board of Appeals.
If approved as proposed, we can begin using the new codes five days after publication of
the notice of your action, or at any time between then and July 1, 2004. We will,
however, have to also seek confirmation (approval) of one section of this ordinance from
the State Building Code Council before we can enforce it. That is section 2, which is the
local amendment dealing with using the IRC as an optional code for smaller projects. I
have spoken with one of the Council members about this local amendment and he
encouraged me to bring it to the Council. Ile thinks other cities will have similar
problems with the 1RC-vs-IBC issue.
ITEM J - 4
AGENDA ITEM STAFF REPORT
FOR: Medina City Council
AGENDA ITEM: Building Code update
PREPARED BY: Bob Rohrbach, Building Official
DATE: April 2, 2004
ORDINANCE UPDATE
During the Council meeting on February 9"'. we discussed the process of adopting a new
series of building, plumbing, mechanical, fuel gas, and fire codes to update the codes in
use in the City to the 2003 editions of the respective codes, in the new International
format. Part of the discussion focused on a proposal I put forward to amend the State
Building Code by making the use of the International Residential Code (IRC) optional for
smaller residences. I indicated that this item must be adopted by the Medina Council and
then presented to the State Building Code Council for confirmation. In order to obtain
public input on this proposal, I indicated that 1 was planning to review this revision Nvith a
number of architects familiar with the type of homes built in Medina.
Following the Febniary Council meeting, I contacted a 1--roup of 16 architects who have
designed buildings in Medina over the past five years. The principles of these firms were
asked to participate in a focus group to discuss the timing of our adoption, and any
amendments associated with the code adoption process. Of the 16 invited, 8 principles or
associates were able to attend the meeting held on February 26`". We also scheduled
some time at the end of the discussion to ask the focus group how we are doing as far as
our service efforts are concerned, and how they perceive the degree of difficulty in
designing new buildings and obtaining permits in _Medina.
After approximately one hour of explanation and some discussion of the content of the
new codes, and the proposed ordinance before the Council, I was able to elicit some
response from the attendees. Lnfortumately, none of those in attendance had reviewed
[lie new codes or attended any of the scininars being presented by the Washington
Association of Building Officials (WABO), to familiarize themselves with the changes
in store. Based on this lack of specific knowledge, and, in part, due to a fear of the
unknown, the focus group voted unanimously to ask that the City not amend the State
Building Code to make the IRC optional. They would rather wait until they have some
experience with the use of these new codes before considering such an amendment.
Accordingly, the proposed amendment to make the IRC optional has been deleted.
There was mixed favor, mostly positive, for the other nvo amendments in the ordinance.
The architects were strongly in favor of limiting the size of fuel storage tanks inside of a
residential building.. and moderately in favor of amending the requirement for handrails
on stairs to maintain the same requirement that is currently in the 1997 edition of -the
UBC. These amendments are still included as a part of this ordinance.
ITEM J - 4
The issue that generated the most passion was the question of when to adopt the new
codes. As I reported to you at the March Council meeting, all those in attendance were
opposed to an early adoption. The reasons were related to the time necessary to get
familiar with the new requirements, and mostly due to the number of projects under
development that were based on the 1997 UBC, with the anticipation that the owner
would be able to apply for a pennit prior to July Pt, which is the date mandated by the
State Legislature.
FEE SCHEDULES
I have been asked to provide some background andjustification for the fee schedules
proposed for adoption in Section 5 of the ordinance. The actual fee tables are found at
the back of the ordinance as Tables A, B, & C.
The fees collected for plan review and for the issuance of the various permits have a long
history which is based on the cost of providing the services of a building department and
performing the plan review and inspection activities. The tables we currently use in the
UBC and the UMC have been developed over a period of 30 years, based on cost of
productivity studies undertaken by the International Conference of Building Officials
(ICBO), together with specific cost -of -service analyses performed by numerous Building
Officials in 32 western states. The tables have been amended from time to time, based on
the increased cost of construction -vs -the cost of providing a reasonable level of service in
the building department.
No system is perfect, however, and many jurisdictions in California have been challenged
in court to prove the cost of specific levels of service in order to justify the fees charged.
This attention was due in part to the rising permit costs, and in part to the actual service
provided by the jurisdictions. In many cases it vvras determined that the City or County
was using some of the revenue from the fees to support staff and facilities not directly
involved in the issuance of permits and the inspection of constriction.
There have even been sonic legal challenges in Washington for the same reasons, which
were settled out of court. The result of this scrutiny has been the deletion of the fee
schedules from the 2003 editions of the various codes. The International Code Council,
the publishers of the International codes, decided to leave this decision to the local
jurisdictions. Therefore, if we want to collect permit fees, we must adopt a local fee
schedule. 1 think it is implicit, in light of the interest in this issue, that we must be able to
defend the amount charged for the permits as a function of the cost of providing the
services.
In order to develop a fee schedule that is fundamentally based on the cost of the services
provided. I began by obtaining a copy of Establishing Building Per snit Fees, a text
published by ICBO, which provides a guide for setting fees based on the level of service
provided, followed by four service cost recovery methodologies, presented as different
approaches to implementing a fee schedule that best meets the needs of the local
jurisdiction. I also used an analysis of service costs prepared by Doug Schulze and Jan
Burduc in the 4111 quarter of 2002 (copy enclosed), which concludes that the fees currently
collected are not sufficient to cover the City's costs for permit review and inspections.
ITEM J - 4
Tables A & C represent an adaptation of the tables printed in the 1997 UBC & the UMC,
-,N hich have been adjusted to provide slightly more revenue to cover the Cites costs. On
average, the new fees represent a 6.67% increase over the current fees for building
permits, and a 5.08% increase for mechanical permits. Table B, designed for grading
permits, is new, but is based on a table that ICBO published as recently as the 1994
edition of the UBC. The rates in Table B are quite different fi-om the old UBC table, due
to a review of available data retarding the time and other costs involved in issuing
grading permits and inspecting the work in progress.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Move to adopt Ordinance No. , which adopts the State Building Code, as
revised, and amends the Medina Municipal Code accordingly, with an effective
date of July 1, 2004.
B. Move to accept the increases in the fees collected for building, grading and
mechanical permits as appropriate and reasonably related to the true costs of
providing the permit, plan review, and inspection services associated with the
administration and enforcement of the State Building Code.
ITEM J — 4a
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE MEDINA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE ADOPTION AND ENFORCEMENT
OF THE STATE BUILDING CODE BY REVISING THE REFERENCED
CODES THROUGHOUT TO THE 2003 EDITIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL
BUILDING, MECHANICAL, AND FIRE CODES, AND THE 2003 EDITION OF
THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, BY DELETING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF
CHAPTER 15.04 THAT ARE NO LONGER APPLICABLE, BY ADDING NEW
FEE SCHEDULES FOR PERMITS ISSUED UNDER THE REFERENCED
CODES, AND BY AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE REFERENCED CODES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA DO ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS. -
SECTION 1. MMC SECTION 15.04.010 AMENDED
Section 15.04.010 of the Medina Municipal Code is hereby amended to
revise the referenced codes to those currently mandated by the State of
Washington, including all State amendments thereto. The revised section shall
read as follows:
"15.04.010 State Building Code Adopted
All construction activity and construction materials in the city shall be
governed by the State Building Code as adopted in Chapter 96, Laws of
1974, as amended by SHB 1734, which updates the State Building Code to
include the 2003 editions of the International Code Council (ICC) building,
mechanical, and fire codes, and the 2003 edition of the Uniform Plumbing
Code and the Uniform Plumbing Code Standards, published by the
International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO).
Also adopted are the most current editions of NFPA 54 & 58, (National Fuel
Gas Code). All codes referenced in this State legislation are hereby
adopted by reference and included as if set forth herein in their entirety.
This adoption shall include all other related codes, standards and
amendments to the referenced codes promulgated by the State Building
Code Council."
SECTION 2. Appendix Chapter H Adopted
Appendix H of the International Building Code is hereby adopted and
incorporated into the body of the International Building Code as though it were
included therein outright. All administrative and enforcement provisions of the
IBC shall apply to this appendix in the same way that they apply to other
elements to the Building Code. Also adopted by reference are all future
amendments and revisions to appendix chapter H.
ITEM J — 4a
SECTION 3. Appendix Chapter J Adopted.
Appendix J of the International Building Code is hereby adopted and
incorporated into the body of the International Building Code as though it were
included therein outright. All administrative and enforcement provisions of the
IBC shall apply to this appendix in the same way that they apply to other
elements of the Building Code. Also adopted by reference are all future
amendments and revisions to appendix chapter J.
SECTION 4. Appendix Chapter M Adopted.
Appendix M of the Uniform Plumbing Code is hereby adopted and
incorporated into the body of the Uniform Plumbing Code as though it were
included therein outright. All administrative and enforcement provisions of the
UPC shall apply to this appendix in the same way that they apply to other
elements of the Plumbing Code. Also adopted by reference are all future
amendments and revisions to appendix chapter M.
SECTION 5. Permit Fee Schedules Adopted.
All permits issued by the City of Medina in conformance with the provisions
of the referenced codes in this Title shall be subject to a plan review fee and/or
a permit fee as prescribed in the attached Tables A, B, and C. These fee
schedules are adopted by reference and incorporated into this Title as though
set forth herein in their entirety.
SECTION 6. MMC SECTION 15.04.030 AMENDED.
Section 15.04.030 of the Medina Municipal Code, which amended Section
301 of the Uniform Building Code, is hereby amended, in part, by changing the
name of the referenced code to the International Building Code and the
International Residential Code, by changing the referenced code section to
Section 105.2 in the IBC and Section R105.2 in the IRC, and by revising
Subsection (a) to conform to the new numbering. Section 15.04.030 shall read,
in part, as follows:
"15.04.030 International Building Code and International Residential
Code — Subsections 105.2, Building, and R105.2, Building, amended.
Subsection 105.2, Building, of the IBC and Subsection R105.2, Building,
of the IRC, which sections define work that is exempt from building permit
requirements, are hereby amended to read as follows:
Building:
(a) Except as specified in Subsection (b) or (c) of this Section, no
building, structure or prefabricated or manufactured assemblage shall be
placed, erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, moved,
improved, removed, converted or demolished unless a separate permit
for each building, structure or assemblage has been obtained from the
Building Official."
Subsections (b) and (c) of 15.04.030 shall remain unchanged and be included
as a part of this Section in their entirety. The Subsections in 105.2 and R105.2
ITEM J — 4a
related to Electrical, Gas, Mechanical, and Plumbing permits shall remain
unchanged in the IBC and the IRC, respectively.
SECTION 7. MMC SECTION 15.04.040 AMENDED.
Section 15.04.040 of the Medina Municipal Code, which amended Section
303(d) of the Uniform Building Code, is hereby amended, in part, by changing
the name of the referenced code to the International Building Code and the
International Residential Code, and by changing the referenced code section to
Section 105.5 in the IBC and Section R105.5 in the IRC. The introduction to
Section 15.04.040, as amended, shall read as follows:
"15.04.040 International Building Code Section 105.5 and International
Residential Code Section R105.5 amended.
Section 105.5 of the International Building Code and Section R105.5 of
the International Residential Code are hereby amended by adding the
following:"
The balance of this section, as found in MMC 15.04.040 shall remain
unchanged and shall be included as if set forth herein in its entirety.
SECTION 8. MMC SECTION 15.04.045 AMENDED, NEW CODE SECTION.
Section 15.04.045, which amended Sections 1807 and 1808 of the Uniform
Building Code, is hereby amended by deleting all reference to sections 1807 &
1808 of the UBC and substituting new language to add a new section
907.2.10.5 to the International Building Code, entitled Alterations, repairs and
additions. The new section shall read as follows:
15.04.045 International Building Code Section 907.2.10.5 added.
Section 907.2.10.5 is hereby added to the International Building Code.
The new section shall read as follows:
907.2.10.5 Additions, alterations and repairs. When interior
alterations, repairs or additions requiring a permit occur, or when
one or more sleeping rooms are added or created in existing
dwellings, the individual dwelling unit shall be provided with smoke
alarms located as required for new dwellings; the smoke alarms
shall be interconnected and hard wired.
Exceptions:
1. Smoke alarms in existing areas shall not be required to be
interconnected and hard wired where the alterations or
repairs do not result in the removal of interior wall or ceiling
finishes exposing the structure, unless there is an attic, crawl
space, or basement available which could provide access for
hard wiring and interconnection without the removal of interior
finishes.
2. Repairs to the exterior surfaces of dwellings are exempt from
the requirements of this section."
ITEM J — 4a
SECTION 9. MMC SECTION 15.04.050 DELETED.
Section 15.04.050, which adopted Section 7003 of the Uniform Building
Code, is hereby deleted in its entirety. The provisions formerly contained in
Section 7003 have been moved to Appendix J in the IBC, which has been
adopted herein, above. This section is no longer necessary.
SECTION 10. NEW MMC SECTION 15.04.050 ADDED, HANDRAILS.
A new Section 15.04.050 is hereby added to amend Section 1009.11,
exception 4 of the IBC to modify the number of stair risers permitted before a
handrail is required. The new section shall read as follows:
"15.04.050 Handrail exemption amended.
Exemption 4 to Section 1009.11 of the International Building Code is
amended to permit a greater number of risers before a handrail is
required. The new exemption shall read as follows:
4. Stairways having less than four risers and serving one individual
dwelling unit in Group R, Division 1 or 3, or Group U occupancies
need not have handrails."
SECTION 11. MMC SECTION 15.04.060 DELETED.
Section 15.04.060, which added a requirement for review by the City
Engineer to the Uniform Building Code is deleted in its entirety. This provision
is maintained in a new section, below.
SECTION 12. MMC SECTION 15.04.070 DELETED.
Section 15.04.070, which provided a minimal permit processing fee for
grading permits is deleted in its entirety. This section is replaced by a new
comprehensive fee schedule, adopted in Section 5, above.
SECTION 13. INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, APPENDIX J, SECTION
J104.5 ADDED.
Section J104 of Appendix J of the IBC, as adopted by the City Council is
amended by the addition of a requirement for review of grading permits by the
City Engineer. The new section shall read as follows:
"J104.5 Review By City Engineer. In addition to the plan review by the
Building Official, all requests for grading permits shall be submitted to the
City Engineer for review and comment prior to approval and issuance by
the Building Official."
SECTION 14. MMC SECTION 15.04.100 DELETED.
Section 15.04.100, which amended Section 11.101 of the Uniform Fire Code
is deleted in its entirety.
SECTION 15. INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, SECTION 307.2, AMENDED.
Section 307.2 of the International Fire Code is amended to add an exception
for certain small recreational fires. The exception shall read as follows:
"Exemption
Small recreational fires used for cooking or campfire purposes when
contained in a stove, pot, receptacle, or other burner designed and
ITEM J — 4a
approved for such use."
SECTION 16. INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, SECTION 307.2.2, AMENDED.
Section 307.2.2 of the International Fire Code is amended to add specific
examples of open burning situations that are prohibited. Section 307.2.2 shall
read as follows:
"307.2.2 Prohibited open burning. Open burning that could, in the
opinion of the Chief, constitute a hazard to the property on which it is
kindled, or to any adjacent property, or which will create an offensive
amount of smoke or odor or other emissions in conflict with air quality
standards shall be prohibited. The fire code official or any employee of
the City of Medina is authorized to order the extinguishment of such fire
upon a determination that it is in violation of this section. Examples of
prohibited burning include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Burning of garbage, rubbish, tires, plastics, or waste petroleum
products.
2. Burning of bulky waste, or natural vegetation from land clearing
or maintenance operations.
3. Burning of any waste from the demolition, construction, recon-
struction, or addition to any building, or any construction -related
activity.
4. Any burning that presents a fire hazard due to atmospheric con-
ditions or which is not in compliance with the regulations of the
Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency.
SECTION 17. MMC SECTION 15.04.110 DELETED.
Section 15.04.110, which amended Section 11.112 of the Uniform Fire
Code, is deleted in its entirety.
SECTION 18. MMC SECTION 15.04.120 AMENDED.
Section 15.04.120 of the Medina Municipal Code, which amended the
definition of "chief" in the Uniform Fire Code is hereby amended to revise the
referenced code to the International Fire Code, and to revise the word "chief' to
"fire code official". The revised section shall read as follows:
"15.04.120 International Fire Code — Definition of fire code official.
All references to "fire code official" within this chapter and within the
International Fire Code shall refer to the chief of the Bellevue fire depart-
ment or to such members of the Bellevue fire department to whom he/she
may designate the functions or responsibilities described in this chapter
or in the International Fire Code."
SECTION 19. MMC SECTION 15.04.150 AMENDED,
Section 15.04.150 of the Medina Municipal Code, which adopted the
appendices of the Uniform Fire Code, is hereby amended to revise the
referenced code to the International Fire Code, and to revise the designation of
the appendices to be adopted. The revised section shall read as follows:
15.04.150 International Fire Code — Appendices adopted.
All references to the adoption of the Washington State Building Code in
ITEM J — 4a
ordinances of the City shall be deemed to have included and shall
include in the future, the following appendices of the International Fire
Code currently in effect in the state of Washington:
A. Appendix B, Fire -Flow Requirements For Buildings
B. Appendix C, Fire Hydrant Locations And Distribution"
SECTION 20. MMC SECTIONS 15.04.160, 15.04.170 & 15.04 180
AMENDED.
Sections 15.04.160, 15.04.170, & 15.04.180 of the Medina Municipal Code
are hereby amended by revising any reference to the "Uniform Fire Code" to
read "International Fire Code". The balance of the sections shall remain
unchanged.
SECTION 21. INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, SECTION 3404.3.4.2,
AMENDED.
Subsection 7 of Section 3404.3.4.2 of the International Fire Code is hereby
amended to limit the amount of flammable or combustible liquids that may be
stored in tanks inside a residence. The new subsection shall read as follows:
"7. Group R occupancies: Quantities in Group R occupancies shall not
exceed that necessary for maintenance purposes and limited operation
of equipment. The maximum quantity in an equipment -mounted tank or
in an above -ground, free-standing fuel tank inside of a residence shall
not exceed 30 gallons and the quantity stored in safety cans shall
not exceed 10 gallons. No increase in storage quantities is permitted
when the building is protected throughout with automatic sprinklers."
SECTION 22. NEW SECTION, APPEALS ADDED
A new section is added to the Medina Municipal Code which shall delete all
references to the Board of Appeals in the adopted codes and direct that all such
appeals shall be heard by the Hearing Examiner, which section shall read as
follows:
"Appeals
In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or
determinations made by the building official or the fire code official
relative to the application and interpretation of these codes applicants
shall have a right of appeal to the Hearing Examiner, as provided in
Chapter 2.78. This appeal process shall replace any reference to a
Board of Appeals in the adopted codes.
An application for appeal shall be based on a claim that the true intent
of the subject code or the rules legally adopted thereunder have been
incorrectly interpreted, the provisions of this code do not fully apply or an
equally good or better form of construction is proposed. The Hearing
Examiner shall have no authority to waive requirements of these codes.
SECTION 23. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this ordinance or its application to any person or
circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance or the application of
the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.
ITEM J — 4a
SECTION 24. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall take effect five days after its publication or the
publication of a summary of its intent and contents.
ITEM J — 4a Fees
TABLE C—NIEC'HA\I('Al. PF.RNII F FEES
Permit Issuance
I_ For the issuance of each mechanical puma _... _ _.._... .........._..-... ...__.. S250(
2_ For issuing_ each supplemental permit for which the original puma has not expwed_ been canceled_ or finAed_ __...... 260
Lnit Fee Schedule
I. Furnaces
For the installation or relocation of each lorcedair or Da%ita one femace or burner including ducts and cents attached to such
appnance up to an inclueing Ha) o0Bt 0 u Ir Q9.3 k") _-. _. _ __._. .____-_ _.ISSo
For the installation of relocation of each foncedom or gmi In type femace or bamer. including ducts and cent attached to such
appliance _oeerInO0OOBut :h(29.3k1`) ___-._. _ _.__.. _. _.... ___19.10
For the installation or relocation of each Moor femace. including gent... _. _ _.. _.. ......... _.... __ 1 30
For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater. ressscd sall heater or door -mounted unit heater. _. __. _.____.15.50
'-. appliance Vents
For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent in,taled and not included in an appliance permit........ _7.60
Repairs or Additions
For the repair of, alteration of or addition to each heating appliance. refrigeration unit. W& ng unit. absorption unit. or each heating,
cooling. absorption or cyaporatiyc coolie_ scstcm. including installation of controls re_eulaled by the mechanical Code. ..........19.50
d. Boilers, Compressm's and Absorption S%stems
For the installation or rclocanon ofeach boiler or compressor to and including three hornpotser I TTo kVC ), or each absorption
scstcrn to and including 100AN Mir (29.3 kN'._.. __.._. ___._ __._ _..._.. __._.. _.... ___15.50
For the installation a Telocann of each boiler or compressor over three horsepo%sm f 10.6 ls% I. to and including Ancen horepo"er
(52 7 k"r,, or each absorption system over 100,000 Del It (29.3 k7A') to and includina AN 000 But In ( 06.6Is" i _.. _. ...X50
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor occr fifteen horsep,mur f5 2J kVA ) to and including thirty horicpmcer
(105-5 kR i. or each absorption system user 500.0(IU Btwh (I-t6-6 loci w and including t 000,000 Btu%h (29.1 ktAr) ---- -. __ 19. 1(1
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over thirty horsey"a ( 105 5 kW) to and including At how posses
(176 kbA )_ or each absorption scstcm occr 100.000 Bm/h (293. 1 k%k ) to and including I 35H 000 Brnrh 1512.9 k" 1 58.N
For the installation ar relocation of each boiler or compressor os ci tifth horsepower i I 'h kVA I. or each absorption ,ystem ON u
1_750000Bwlir0129kV,') __ _._... _..... _.. __.. __.._... _..._. _.973o
5. Air Handlers
For each air -handling unit to and including 10.000 cubic feetper minute Icfn) (9719 I_sy including ducts attached thereto... __.. 11.20
Note ibis fee does not apply to an air -handling unit whwh is a portion ota factorpa.ssennhWd appliance, Cooling unit, ecaporatice
cooler or absorption trait for Mach a permit is rcyuired elsewhere in The .yhchunical Code.
For each am handhng unit over 10.000 chi 07191 s) ___... _....... _ _ _ _._. _ 19.00
6. Evaporative Coolers
Foreache%aporwecooler otherThan portabletype. __-_. ____. _...._. _..__._ ___. __.11.211
Ventilation and Exhaust
F or each vcntlation fan connected to a single duct _.... _...... _ __.___ __..... _7.60
For each %telo niou nsteto tshicl: is not a portion of any heating or ;stem authorized be a permit 11.20
I or the installation oteach hood kchich is sa%ed by mechanical e%haust_ inducing the ducts lot such hood.. _... ___... _..11.20
R. Incinerators
Forthe installation m relocation ofeach domestic -thee incinerafer _. _ __........_ 19.I0
I w the uutaHat I on or rdocatunI otcach co namerc i al or industrial -thee ins i nets l or. _ _... _ __. _. _ _ _ _ _ _.25.50
Q Aliscellaneous
For each appliance or piece of eyuipmcnI regulated be the Mcchan cal Code but not classed m other upplance cawwrwv. or no,
1i Inch no other tee is sited in this table _.. _.. _. _.__.... _..__.1120
Poo all gas piping nhAan fee; see King Counts IOlt Dcp iMan We>chadu'.c.
10. For permits requiring a mechanical plan review, permit fees shall be determined by valuation and calculated using Table A.
11. Plan Review, initial........................................................................................................... 259ru OF PERNII I FEE
12. :Additional review of corrections, revisions, or additions............................................................0 OAS I LT. -ANT COS IS
11 Review of deferred items...................................................................................................CONSI. LT.AVI COS IS
19. One inspection & one re-inspecliun.......................................................................................Include(] in Permit Fees
15_ :Additional reduspecdons for compliance ................................................... �............................CO.NSI LT,\NT COSTS
10 AVork riot read% for inspection when scheduled .. ................. ..................................................... (CONSL IA AN `I COSTS
I Inspections for which no fee is specified................................................................................. C ONSL 1 -1 ANT COSTS
ITEM J - 5
CITY OF MEDINA
Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039
(425) 454-9222 www.ci.medina.wa.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 6, 2004
TO: City Council; City Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
RE: Update - Medina Beach Park Bulkhead Rehabilitation and General
Improvement Project
1. Purpose — To update the City Council on the Medina Beach Park Bulkhead and
General Improvement project.
2. Background —
a. During the City Council (CC) Study Session (SS) on September 22,
2003, a project concept proposal for the subject project was made to the CC by the
Director of Public Works (DPW). In preparation for the SS, the DPW provided the
CC with a memo which identified and detailed each of the problems associated
with the Medina Beach Park bulkhead, docks and swimming area. The memo then
proposed solutions to each of 6 basic questions. The overall intent of the proposal
was to gain CC concurrence on the courses of action to address each of the 6
questions.
b. Included in this packet (Item J-5a) is a copy of the memo prepared by the
DPW for that September SS. After receiving answers to several questions during
the September SS, the CC voted unanimously to approve the entire course of
action for the project as proposed by the DPW.
c. In December 2003, the CC passed the City's 2004 budget which
included funding to support this Medina Beach Park Bulkhead Rehabilitation and
General Improvement 2004 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) project.
3. Project Update / Status —
a. In mid January 2004, after funding was included in the 2004 budget for
this project, the DPW brought together a team to continue the work on all aspects
of the project which had been initiated in 2003. The team consists of OTAK Inc.
which is working with the DPW on project coordination and management, Golder
Associates which has responsibility for the geotechnical investigation work and the
design of the piling supported docks, Art Anderson Associates which specializes in
ITEM J - 5
the general design, and construction of waterfront and shoreline projects. and
Shapiro Associates which specializes in working shoreline permitting issues and
aquatic habitat creation.
b. Over the past three months, the team has been focusing on:
(1) Gathering additional data on the subsurface conditions under the
docks.
(2) Determining the condition of the piles under the old Dustin
property dock.
(3) Designing the graded rock filter behind the bulkhead, repairs to
the existing bulkhead, and the extension of the bulkhead in front of the old Dustin
property.
(4) Designing the aquatic habitat which will meet the regulatory
resource agency requirements as part of the permitting mitigation.
(5) Designing the two docks which will meet the Park needs as well
as satisfy regulatory resource agency requirements for permit approval.
(6) Designing the modifications to the jetty to improve water
circulation in the small swimming beach area.
(7) Working with the various regulatory resource agencies to ensure
approval of the multitude of permits required for this in -water project once
submitted.
c. The following is a list of some of the approvals and/or reviews required
for this project.
(1) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (City of Medina)
(2) Grading and Drainage Permit (City of Medina)
(3) State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist and Review
(City of Medina / Corps of Engineers / State Department of Fish and Wildlife)
(4) Joint Aquatic Resource Permit Application (JARPA) with
Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) (Corps of Engineers, State Department of Fish
and Wildlife and others)
(5) 401 Water Quality Certificate (Corps of Engineers and State
Department of Fish and Wildlife)
(6) 404 Discharge of Dredge and Fill Materials permit (Corps of
Engineers and State Department of Fish and Wildlife)
(7) Endangered Species Act (ESA) Consultation which will also
require a Biological Evaluation/Biological Assessment (BE/BA) (Corps of
Engineers, State Department of Fish and Wildlife, State Department of Ecology.
NOAA Fisheries and US Fish and Wildlife)
ITEM J - 5
(8) Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Consistency Determination
(State Department of Ecology)
(9) Building Permit (City of Medina)
d. As expected, the permitting requirements and associated mitigation
requisites to obtain the permits are dictating much of the design. Additionally, both
docks will require almost complete replacement not only because of the poor
condition of the existing structures, but also to meet the resource agency
requirements for habitat support and/or enhancement.
e. The design concept being developed for the old Dustin property dock is
to construct an entirely new dock pretty much over the footprint of the existing
dock. The new dock will most likely be built with a pedestrian walkway leading out
to an "L" shaped rectangular deck area. Single steel piles spaced considerably
further apart than the current wooden piles will support the walkway and the main
deck area (the single piles and spacing are part of the fish habitat mitigation
measures required for permit approval). The rectangular area is being
designed/sized to accommodate two square picnic tables and low bench type
seating around the perimeter. The entire dock will most likely be decked with one
of the new materials which allows significant light passage for small fish habitat
support.
f. The dock in front of City Hall will most likely also be a pedestrian walkway
out to a "T" shaped rectangular deck area. The resource agencies will not approve
a large deck area near shore due to the negative small fish habitat support
impacts. The same structural features noted above will be included in this dock
design, however, there is no intent to make this a picnic or pedestrian attraction.
The primary purpose of this dock is to support marine law enforcement
requirements.
g. An abbreviated general basic sequence of activities is as follows
(although many are done concurrently): Evaluate design options for all
components of the project; prepare illustrations for permit applications; meet with
resource agencies to review initial concepts and determine minimum requirements;
prepare conceptual designs for all components; prepare the draft BE/BA; submit
draft BE/BA for agency review; prepare SEPA checklist; prepare JARPA (401 /404,
HPA); prepare Shoreline Permit Application; obtain a consistency determination of
the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) certification, prepare grading and drainage
permit; secure all permits minus construction permit; finalize design; obtain building
permit; prepare contract; advertise for contract; award contract, start construction.
h. The most significant unknown in the entire project is what the resource
agencies will approve and/or require in the form of mitigation even beyond what we
are proposing, as well as when we might be able to get final approval in order to
proceed with construction. There are also "fish windows" when no in -water
construction can be performed — typically from around mid -March to the
July/August timeframe. Given the complexity of this project and number of permits
and agency reviews and approvals which will be required, it is anticipated that
ITEM J - 5
most of 2004 will be consumed with just getting through the project approval stage
with no guarantee that approval will happen even by the end of 2004. Additionally,
we will not want to be doing construction in the Beach Park area during the
summer beach season. Therefore, as noted in the original memo, this will be at
least a two year and maybe even a three year phased project.
i. There are also a number of improvements to the "upland" area of the
Beach Park included in this project. However, these features will not be worked
until we are well along with the "in -water" portions of the overall effort.
j. Attached to this memo are some pictures of the wave energy and water
over -spray that develops against the bulkhead during periods of high wind and
Lake Washington wave action. These pictures were actually taken on a day when
the wind and waves were not all that high. In other words, much more severe
conditions have been observed along the Beach Park and bulkhead. Additionally,
there is a picture recently taken of the continuing failure behind the concrete
bulkhead. Compare it to the pictures shown in Figure 7 in the original September
memo. You will see additional collapsing of the back part of this portion of the
bulkhead. This is indicative of what we are continuing to see all along the frontage,
and the storms during the winter of '03 — '04 have been fewer than in past winters
as well as less severe.
Y�
y
�o
p a N f
3
t
J
to
11
a-
s
�r•
_
E
,gyp
j
s
�M
1
.C.. J777
N,
�
� y
r
ITEM J — 5a
CITY OF MEDINA
Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039
(425) 454-9222 www.ci.medina.wa.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 17, 2003
TO: City Council; City Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
RE: Medina Beach Park Bulkhead Rehabilitation and General
Improvements Project Proposal
1. Purpose — To present the City Council with the proposed general concept to
make the necessary repairs to the Medina Beach Park bulkhead and general
improvements to the Park, with the intent of obtaining Council concurrence on the
conceptual course of action being pursued by the Director of Public Works.
2. Project Location —the project is located as shown in Figure 1.
3. Background —
a. The Medina Beach Park rock bulkhead/revetment is failing. The extent
of the failure increases with each major wind storm and high energy wave action.
The rock bulkhead, constructed in approximately 1961 and backfilled with primarily
fine grained material to create the beach park, has partially collapsed, caved in, or
sloughed off at several locations along the bulkhead frontage. Additionally, the
large voids in the bulkhead are allowing storm wave energy to penetrate through
the rocks and induce piping/erosion of the fine grained backfill soils. When the
bulkhead was constructed, a graded filter was not installed between the large
bulkhead rock and the fine grained fill soil to eliminate or at least reduce the backfill
erosion. Voids are now being created in these upland soils, thus undermining the
park at multiple locations. Increasing damage has been observed with each major
lake storm. Figure 2 is a picture showing the bulkhead and beach park under
construction around 1961. Figures 3 thru 5 show the rock bulkhead and examples
of the failures and damage which can be readily seen from the surface. What is
not easily seen is the significant undermining of the fine grained fill soil. This
problem has been detected through soil exploration and other observations.
b. When the City purchased the Dustin property just to the east of City Hall,
we inherited a concrete wall bulkhead which runs along the lakefront property
interface with Lake Washington as shown in Figure 6 (we also inherited the Dustin
boat dock). As shown in Figures 7 & 8, this wall is also showing signs of significant
ITEM J — 5a
failure and undermining. Figure 7 shows the settlement due to undermining which
has occurred just between September 2002 and July 2003.
c. Significant algae buildup and debris has been observed in the small
swimming cove protected by the rock jetty as shown in Figures 9 & 10. These
problems tend to get cleaned out during high wave action or when the wind comes
directly from the west or northwest. However.. for most of the summer, the wind
comes from the south or southwest. and the buildup makes the swimming area
less appealing to the beach users.
d. Both docks at the beach are in need of repair. The old Dustin property
dock is in such bad shape that we currently do not allow access for safety
considerations. Figures 11 — 13 show some of the problems we have with the
docks.
e. Some subsurface soils exploration and bathymetric data collection has
already been accomplished in order to determine the feasibility or suitability of
design options to make the necessary repairs (Figures 14 & 15).
4. Project Questions / Proposals — The Director of Public Works (DPW) has
generated some basic questions relative to the project (Figure 16) and is proposing
general answers to the questions as shown in Figures 17-22. The following
provides additional information regarding each question:
a. Should the City retain the same basic rock style bulkhead along the
Medina Beach Park front? There have been several options looked at over the
past few years which propose a beach front different from the large rock bulkhead
as constructed in 1961. Two such proposals include eliminating the large rock
altogether leaving a gentle sloping large pebble beach running out into the water
(large pebbles to fairly large rocks because any finer grained material simply
disappears with the high wave energy); or replacing the large rock bulkhead with
some sort of "step-down" rock or concrete slab arrangement. The DPW
recommends we keep the same large rock bulkhead as has existed over the past
40+ years. Attempting to make any major changes would be more costly than
repairing what we currently have, plus gaining the necessary permits to do any
other alternative would be a challenge and may end up not be allowed at all.
b. Does the City want to try and expand the swimming area? We have
been able to maintain some finer grained material (coarse sand) in the current
small cove swimming area primarily because of the protection provided by the
small jetty. However, even with the jetty, enough wave energy enters the cove at
certain times of the year to wash away any fine grained sands we try to spread
over the beach. Without an additional jetty or some level of breakwater protection,
any new swimming area would end up having a fairly large pebble or rock surface
which is not very appealing to swimmers, especially smaller children. Additionally,
there are concerns that expanding the swimming area would attract more beach
users than the Park (and parking lot) can currently handle. Additionally, if we
maintain the number of summer lifeguards as we have in the past, they have their
ITEM J — 5a
hands full just trying to watch the current designated swimming area. The DPW
recommends we not try to expand the swimming area.
c. Does the City want to remove the failing concrete bulkhead wall along
the front of the acquired Dustin property and replace it with a rock bulkhead which
matches the existing bulkhead (assuming a decision is made to retain the existing
bulkhead style) as diagramed in Figure 18? The DPW proposes that we do exactly
this. Clearly the concrete bulkhead needs to be removed. One thought was to try
and make this area a new swimming beach. However, if we were to do this, we
would encounter the problems as outlined in b. above while trying to maintain and
monitor an additional swimming area which would be appealing to beach users.
Further, the permitting actions as noted in g. below, will not likely allow this option.
d. If the City decides to keep the existing large rock bulkhead, how should it
be repaired? The DPW has worked with several engineers familiar with this type
of work, and the logical and least expensive solution is to place a graded rock filter
with geotextile filter fabric behind the existing (and new) rock bulkhead as show in
Figure 19. Additionally, more large rock, identical to the current rock, would be
brought in to build up and reinforce the existing bulkhead as well as extend it in
front of the acquired Dustin property (as shown in Figure 18).
e. Does the City want to repair the existing docks (see Figure 21)? The
DPW recommends that we fix both docks. The concept is to keep the small dock
similar to what it is today although reinforce it, make it level and design it to be
more "fish friendly" (this will likely be required anyway in order to obtain the
necessary permits). Additionally, the concept is to make the large old Dustin dock
a nice park / pedestrian type dock with benches, plants, etc., but again, "fish
friendly."
f. Should the City insert box type culverts into the existing small jetty to help
"flush" the small beach cove area (see Figure 20)? The DPW has investigated this
option with engineers familiar with this practice and believes the approach will help
reduce the algae and debris buildup in the swimming cove, yet still dissipate the
wave energy so the beach sand we currently have in the cove doesn't get washed
away. The DPW recommends we add the culverts to the small jetty, of course with
safety screens / bars installed on each end to prevent swimmers from entering or
getting trapped.
g. Should the City create a natural fish habitat area in the area shown on
Figure 22? The DPW has been working with the Washington State Department of
Fish and Wildlife regarding the necessary permitting requirements to be able to do
any work to the bulkhead. The general feedback is that considerable mitigation will
most likely be required in order to obtain the permits necessary to do even the
basic work. The suggested mitigation is to create the natural fish habitat area as
shown in Figure 22. Although not yet designed, the concept is to place the right
gravel, place underwater plants, plant shoreline shrubs and trees, etc., all of which
will strongly support an enhanced fish habitat area. It would also be an off-limits
swimming area as well as a park user / pedestrian fish watching area. The bottom
ITEM J — 5a
line is that the City may end up being required to create this habitat area simply to
get approval to make the repairs to the bulkhead.
5. Summary — The DPW has presented these proposals to the Park Board and
has gained the Board's concurrence. Additionally, while the work is being done,
some additional small landscaping, path work, new bench and picnic table
installation, irrigation expansion, etc., will be included in this overall Medina Beach
Park rehabilitation and improvements project. Finally, as proposed in the 2004-
2009 Capital Improvement Plan, this work is projected to take place in two phases
over two years (2004 and 2005). The work and timing of the work will depend
primarily on what transpires from the permitting applications. Again, the DPW is
asking for general concept concurrence from the City Council in order to continue
the planning, design, and permit application process.
Z
� O
w Q
O
LL W
F—
' ► 4LFAA
� i Y
f
a
F s &
p Yf 3 $ 1
Z
N
W
(j
Q
W
J
=
00
O
U
C
Z
0
r
U
Ale
war
Ll
t
100000000*,00$$*loo
�� \\ .. . \ d\/ \�^ � \� � � �
I
yj A Y � yT
M
1�a
y �a.
i' f:
,
, 10
�s
r p
i tSVG
yt
y � art l yy ry. i S
axlX�Y f " :�jl
Pe
W
J_
Q
U.
�a
W W
D J
LL m
W
W
w
U
z
"F
1 �
i
}
"� ��•• / •. `' .E�" 'Y t.a a .a ��
ov)
CW
o
8 41,
Zfw
Pik, pit
- 4;4;
Sri
A t&
@g
i
'•' ��. ` 4`� %k � S F 1 t
t11
W -J
W;R
LL
LL
0
13
0
N
tit,
a.
of
VZ
��� je �� of
of
1 10
PIP
lo
Al
77
I
z
0
F-
0
Re J
qr- 0.
Lu X
UJ
Lu
00
rL- <
LL
U)
VJ
fd
,
iY
{
r
t
q
r '
k'
Y,
f
L.
.q
fi
{
e
a �
�•
0
I a
w
1 r•
J �
Q
w w a
F' w n W
ui
a = a
V N F-
a Z Z H
= W L) V Q
m a W
LL Z w W LL
ZO 0 g J H p J
- w a w w aa,
u ~ Cl) 0 CO 0 Y Z ~
C'1 w w Z a U= Z
a 0 L a
LLJ CD Z> z w z
a a 2 � >. w
U W w c.' w ti w U
H
0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0
a a a� a a a a
� � � 0 � � � �
0 0 oL.L 0 0 0 0
Y =
F-
� � Y
_ U
Y 0
�— Z 2 Q
cup to a
U - J otS
a U.w CL J
CL J `W Z
W U. = w
Z LLJ
w O LL
LL
J a � p
cQ p p Q W F-
F- U.
CL w w W a Q 2
O = _ U C� W w
� J J U a 0 Z = F- w
J w ~ W
m m? a W? Y Q
UU°a0v,n- �
W�¢
O Q w Q W w i
w
W Z Y v F=- Y a
O= -j p w a U=
� U F- m O Z
uZ U p Cl)
w= o w Q X a 0 Q w u.
~ W w E' O W U j Z F=- Q
a Y aLU
~°° a a
J p Z Z F- — a
W W p W p O O W l
\�
; < z
MIN
/
S
/
�
\
LL
06
w
§
LL
I
7f
\§&\
ct§r
2ujum
�aa>
)z0
«x
2uj
e92/@!§
aoo»#uaf
<oc�n�o
z
<zx�om
22�§xLU
w
m0
X,(
LU
/ <
«\
;<
,e
(�
co
_
W
w
D
10
�
Y
U
0
Y
Y
a.
O
0
=z
�
�
r
z
Q
a
W
J
ab
Q
c'
LL
J
a.
O
w
J
W
Z
W
O
W
u
O
LL
J
Z
F
=
w
y
LL
a W
W>
a
g
_
=
O
w
w
LL >
j
t9
`'
}
r
r w
m
in
1.
)
ri
h-
Z
Y Q
r
U
W
F
Q�w
IIx
� Q
i r
W
F
W
W
Y
W
Z[
.'J
�-
j
Q
2
Q
U =
O
r
-,
r
a
Z
U
w
O
a
tZ
W
2
p
ti
Q
X
S
Q
W LL
H
W
W:-
w
U
m
Z
I=- Q
Z>
IY r
O
Y
:;;
r-
O
z
O
z
Q
i
Q Q
w
w
M
0
o
o
rui
U
3
w ly
TM
T�
W
0
LL
Y = o N� ^ "fir � •} w.. r w �4 „y�lr�
U.
Y M O
o a�
.7 w _
f3 (n a �y
W aE Bl
J W
a 0
w Z 1 '
Ir LL 1. w R'
0 W w
i
W + LL Z K J
Q Q !
:.. /1 R
O a Q j T a' LL
W rL �' W
aJ }> W R
Y w x Z ?i W
UO W6 to W W
Q W Q W
U x x F CO CO A'
W m¢ z
w= o w a w a �; LU LL k �-
xx,
�- O O f
a o z z r- a LLI
ii m Q 0 Z 6r U r a.
A e °-
rI
% c
e• ff .
k ,fit
r r
yy y
s
0
0�
§
f
uj
iL
w
w
w
m
0
D
LU
Od
w
U.
<
w
CL
CL
w
w
It
U-
m
a
W
0
0
Z
W
cn°a
w
0
F-
W
W
>
Lij
CL
X
n
0
m
:)
<
L)
LLI
Ix
L)
U)
Z
x
U)
uj
w
m
z
IL
U
F
z
w=
1
W
L)
0
W
0
W
W
M
x>
w
2
(-)
rL
o
-j
0
w]
=)
o
z
0
L)
M:
to
cc
w
<
z
U)
w
x
Wmcw<(L<C)
X
M
�-<zX0;
m�-
O0
,�
�-w
W
0
w
u
0
0
<
F-
2
-j
aw
Z
Z
W
W
Z)
LU
m
o
o
U)
w
CX
Co
cr
0
a
0
U)
C)
AIL—.
-No-
o z z
ITEM J - 6
CITY OF MEDINA
City Manager's Office
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
.medina-wa.gov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 5, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager
RE: 2003 — 2005 Public Works Labor Agreement
RECOMMENDATION: Approve 2003 — 2005 Public Works Labor Agreement.
POLICY IMPLICATION: The Labor Agreement establishes wages, benefits, and working conditions
for Public Works employees. The Public Works Union previous labor
agreement expired December 31, 2002. The proposed labor agreement is
a three-year contract, which will expire December 31, 2005.
BACKGROUND: The Labor Agreement discussed with the City Council during the March 8,
2004 Study Session was presented to the Public Works Union on March 9,
2004. The Union has accepted the City's proposal.
AGREEMENT
by and between
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON
and
PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL & OFFICE -CLERICAL EMPLOYEES AND DRIVERS
LOCAL UNION NO. 763
(Representing the Public Works Employees)
January 01, 2003 through December 31, 2005
THIS AGREEMENT is by and between the CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, hereinafter referred to as
the Employer, and PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL & OFFICE -CLERICAL EMPLOYEES AND DRIVERS
LOCAL UNION NO. 763, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, hereinafter referred to
as the Union.
ARTICLE I RECOGNITION UNION MEMBERSHIP AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION
1.1 Recognition - The Employer recognizes the Union as the exclusive bargaining representative
for all employees in the bargaining unit, which shall include all full-time and regular part-time
maintenance employees; excluding supervisors, confidential employees and all other employees
of the Employer. Supervisors excluded shall not mean the Maintenance Supervisor.
ARTICLE II NON-DISCRIMINATION
2.1 No employee shall be discriminated against for upholding lawful Union principles or serving
on a committee. The Employer and the Union shall not unlawfully discriminate against any
individual with respect to his hiring, compensation, terms or conditions of employment because of
such individual's race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or marital status, or the presence of any
physical, mental or sensory handicap, or age, except as such may be a bona fide occupational
qualification; nor shall they limit, segregate or classify employees in anyway to deprive any
individual employee of his employment opportunities, except as such may be a bona fide
occupational qualification. Disputes regarding this Article may be handled through either the
grievance procedure or the applicable regulatory agency. The choice of one remedy shall
preclude the utilization of the other.
2.2 Wherever words denoting a specific gender are used in this Agreement, they are intended
and shall be construed so as to apply equally to either gender.
ARTICLE III MANAGEMENT RIGHTS
3 1 The Union recognizes the right of the Employer to operate and manage its affairs in all respects
in accordance with its responsibilities and the powers and authority the Employer may possess
subject to the terms of this Agreement. Such rights, powers, authority and functions shall include
but in no way shall be limited to the determination of the size and composition of the work force,
the selection, retention, discipline, layoff or discharge of employees, the direction and assignment
of the work force, the allocation of work assignments among all employees; the establishment of
work rules; the determination and location of anyjob sites, the determination of the equipment to
be utilized and the methods to be used in the discharge of work functions; and the right to contract
and subcontract any and all work as the need may arise, as long as said subcontracting does not
result in the layoff of bargaining unit employees.
ARTICLE IV UNION MEMBERSHIP
4.1 Employees covered by the Agreement shall be required as a condition of employment, not later
than thirty (30) days following ratification of this Agreement or their date of employment, whichever
is later, to become and remain members in good standing in the Union during the term of this
Agreement.
4.2 Payroll Deduction — The Employer shall deduct from the pay of each employee covered by this
Agreement, upon their written authorization, the dues and fees of the Union, and shall remit to
said Union all such deductions monthly. The Union shall indemnify, defend and hold the Employer
harmless against any claims made and against any suit instituted against the Employer on
account of any check -off of dues and fees for the Union. The Union shall refund to the Employer
any amounts paid to it in error on account of this check -off provision upon presentation of proper
evidence thereof. No deduction shall be made that is prohibited by applicable law.
E V UNION BUSINESS
5.1 Union Officials Time -Off - The Union shall have the right to select one (1) employee as a Unit
Steward. The investigation of grievances and other Union business performed by the Steward
shall normally be conducted only during non -working time. Where it is necessary to conduct any
Union business during working time, specific approval must be obtained from the supervisor.
5.2 Bulletin Boards - The Employer shall provide suitable space for a Union bulletin board on its
premises in an area, which is frequented by all employees within the bargaining unit.
5.3 Union Notification — The Employer agrees to furnish the Union a seniority roster showing the
names of all employees in the bargaining unit, their classification, and date of hire. This list shall
be revised each six (6) months thereafter.
ARTICLE VI HOURS OF WORK
6.1 Work Schedule - The work week shall consist of five (5) consecutive days of eight (8) consecutive
hours or four (4) days of ten (10) consecutive hours for all full time employees, excluding meal
period. The work weeks shall be scheduled Monday through Friday.
6.1.1 By mutual agreement between the Employer and the employee, an employee may have flexible
starting times, ending times, meal periods and working hours.
6.2 Rest Periods —Employees shall receive a rest period of fifteen (15) minutes, on the
employer's time, for each four (4) hour work period. Rest period shall be scheduled as near as
possible to the midpoint of each four (4) hour work period, and shall be taken at or near the job
site. No employee shall be required to work more than three (3) hours without a rest period.
6.3 Meal Periods — Employees shall receive a meal period of thirty (30) minutes which shall be on the
employee's own time and shall commence no less than three (3) hours nor more than five (5)
hours from the beginning of the work shift.
6.4 Light Duty— While an employee is receiving disability leave supplement, the employee,
subject to the approval of his/her treating physician, may perform light duty tasks as the Employer
may require, with no reduction in the disability leave supplement. The duration of such light duty
assignments shall be at the sole discretion of the Employer and shall not exceed one hundred
eighty (180) calendar days. Total monthly compensation during this period shall not exceed the
employee's regular monthly salary.
AGREEMENT 2003 - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PUBLIC WORKS)
04,05,2004 DRAFT
PA( iE
6.5 Schedule Change — Employer will attempt to provide a minimum of two (2) weeks notice for
changes to work schedules. Emergency or unanticipated schedule changes are understood to be
exempt from this language.
ARTICLE VII OVERTIME
7.1 If an employee is required to work (includes compensatory time, sick leave and vacation) in
excess of their regular daily schedule or forty (40) hours per week, the employee shall be
compensated for such work at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the regular straight -time hourly rate
of pay.
7.2 Overtime shall be paid to the nearest quarter hour.
7.3 Compensation for overtime shall be in the form of additional compensatory time off or extra pay at
the employee's option. No employee shall accumulate more than eighty (80) hours of
compensatory time in one (1) year or carry over more than forty (40) hours compensatory time
into a succeeding year.
7.4 All overtime must be authorized in advance by the employee's supervisor or within
twenty-four (24) hours after its occurrence under circumstances where the supervisor is not
available for prior authorization.
7.5 Every effort shall be made to offer scheduled overtime to employees on a rotating basis.
ARTICLE VIII CALLBACK AND ON -CALL DUTY
8.1 Callback — Maintenance employees called back to work after having completed the scheduled
shift and having left the premises shall receive callback pay of a minimum of three (3) hours at
one and one-half (1-112) times the employee's regular straight -time rate of pay. Callback shall not
apply in cases of scheduled overtime.
8.2 On -Call Duty — An employee who is required to be available and subject to call shall receive an
On -Call Duty Allowance of two dollars ($2.00) per hour for each hour the employee is required to
be available and subject to call. The employee shall be provided with a communications device in
order to respond to callout without undue restrictions on activities. The duty allowance shall not be
calculated into the "regular rate' for overtime payment purposes.
ARTICLE IX WAGES
9.1 Employees covered by this Agreement shall receive the rates of pay as set forth in Appendix
"A" to this Agreement which by this reference shall be incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
9.2 Deferred Compensation — Employees are eligible to receive contributions from the City toward the
ICMA Deferred Compensation Plan. The City's contributions are a one-to-one match, up to one -
hundred dollars ($100.00) maximum per month for a regular full-time employee.
AGREEMENT 2003 - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PUBLIC WORKS)
04,05,2004 DRAFT
PAGE=
ARTICLE X HOLIDAYS
10.1 Employees shall receive the following holidays off with pay. Employees shall receive
compensation based on their regular scheduled workday at the regular straight -time hourly rate of
pay:
New Year's Day
1" of January
Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday
3rd Monday of January
President's Day
3rd Monday of February
Memorial Day
Last Monday of May
Independence Day
4ch of July
Labor Day
1" Monday of September
Veteran's Day
111i of November
Thanksgiving Day
4`r' Thursday of November
Day After Thanksgiving Day
DaY after Thanksgiving Day
Christmas Day
25" of December
Two (2) "Floating Holidays" designated by
the employee.
10.2 Regular part-time employees shall receive pro rata holidays based upon the relationship of
the hours worked per week to forty (40) hours.
10.3 Employees required to work on a holiday shall be paid two and one-half (2-1/2) times the
employee's regular straight -time rate of pay, for a minimum of three (3) hours.
ARTICLE XI VACATIONS
11.1 Eligibility - Regular employees shall accrue vacation time off with pay as set forth in Section
11.2, based upon the employee's continuous length of service accumulated as of the most
recent anniversary date of his employment. An employee shall not be eligible to take vacation
time off until he shall have worked for the Employer for a minimum of twelve (12) calendar
months from his most recent anniversary date of employment.
11.2 Accrual - Vacation time -off shall accrue on the following basis:
LENGTH OF CONTINUOUS SERVICE ANNUAL LEAVE
First year 96 hours
Second through fourth years 104 hours
Fifth through seventh years 128 hours
Eighth and ninth years 136 hours
Tenth through fourteenth years 160 hours
Fifteenth through nineteenth years 176 hours
Twentieth year 192 hours
Twenty-first and subsequent years 200 hours
Application of this Section shall not reduce the number of days any employee is currently
earning.
11.3 Payment upon Termination - No vacation credit shall be given unless the employee has
worked for the Employer at least six (6) months. In the case of employment for six (6) months
or longer, upon termination of employment, employees shall receive all vacation time earned and
not yet taken, provided however, this termination benefit shall be forfeited In the event of
discharge for just cause, or in the case of voluntary termination where the employee has failed to
give the Employer at least two (2) weeks written notice of such termination.
AGREEMENT 2003 - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PUBLIC WORKS)
04,05,2004 DRAFT
PAGE4
11 A Death Benefit - Upon the death of an employee in active service, the accrued vacation pay
of the deceased employee shall be paid to his estate.
11.5 Carryover - Maximum vacation accrual carried forward at year end will be one and one-half (1 112)
times the employee's annual accrual. The City Manager may approve additional days to be
carried into the succeeding years provided unique work -related circumstances existed, which
prevented employee's use of leave.
11.6 Part -Time Employees - Regular part-time employees vacation accrual shall be pro rata, based
upon the relationship of the hours worked per week to forty (40) hours.
11.7 Scheduling - Vacations shall be scheduled at such times as the Employer finds most suitable after
considering the wishes of the employees and the requirements of the department. Scheduling
conflicts shall be resolved on the basis of seniority.
11.8 Employees shall receive vacation compensation based on their regular scheduled workday.
ARTICLE XII SICK LEAVE
12.1 Accrual - Employees shall accumulate sick leave with pay at the rate of one (1) day per month of
service, provided however, no employee shall be accredited with an accumulation greater than
nine hundred sixty (960) hours. Employees hired after the execution of this Agreement shall
receive ninety six (96) hours upon initial hire to be repaid from the first year's accrual. Leave used
but not earned shall be repaid to the Employer upon termination.
12.2 Usage - Sick leave shall be granted upon application before or within reasonable time after the
absence, depending on the circumstance of each case. Each employee shall use sick leave
solely for the purpose of bona fide illness or injury and utilization of sick leave for any other
purpose shall be cause for disciplinary action. The Employer may require that the employee
furnish a physician's proof of illness.
12.2.1 Sick leave may be utilized for care of immediate family as described in Article 12.4.1.
12.3 In the event employees are absent for reasons, which are covered by State Industrial Insurance,
the Employer shall, at the employee's request, pay the employee an amount equal to the
difference between the amount paid the employee by the Department of Labor and Industries and
the amount the employee would have otherwise been eligible to receive in sick leave. Such
payment(s) to the employee shall be made at such times as the difference is reasonably
determinable. A deduction shall be made from the employee's accumulated sick leave in
accordance with the amount paid to the employee by the Employer until such time as the
employee's accumulated sick leave is depleted.
12.4 Emergency Leave - In the event of critical illness in the employee's immediate family, the
employee may be granted leave of absence with pay for a minimum three (3) working days.
12.4.1 The term "immediate family" shall be defined as spouse, domestic partner and children of the
employee, step -children, step-parents, and/or grandmother, grandfather, mother, father, mother-
in-law, father-in-law, sister, brother, or other relative living in the employee's household, or to
established relationships having attributes of familial ties.
12.4.2 An employee may be excused by his department head to attend funeral services of a deceased
City employee without loss of pay.
12.4.3 A regular full-time employee may take up to thirty (32) hours of funeral leave for a death in the
employee's immediate family With department director approval, up to forty-eight (48) additional_
AGREEMENT 2003 - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PUBLIC WORKS)
04%05i2004 DRAFT
PAGt.
hours of sick leave may be utilized in these situations, for a total absence of eighty (80) hours (two
regular work weeks).
12.5 Donation of Sick Leave — Employees may donate their accrued sick leave to another employee
who, because of substantial health condition must take time off from work for medical treatment
or prolonged convalescence. Employees must leave a minimum of one -hundred (100) hours in
their sick leave bank at the time of donation.
12.6 Family Medical Leave - Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary that may be contained
elsewhere in this Agreement, employees who have been employed by the Employer for at
least one thousand two hundred fifty (1250) hours (an average of twenty-four (24) hours per
week) during the previous fifty-two (52) consecutive weeks shall be eligible for up to twelve (12)
weeks family leave without pay during any twelve (12) month period for any of the following
reasons: (1) the birth or placement of a child or adoption or foster care; or (2) a serious health
condition of an employee or an employee's spouse, child or parent. To the extent available, an
employee shall use accrued paid leave (e.g. sick leave, vacation) during family leave to assure
that the total scheduled leave of all kinds shall not exceed twelve (12) weeks in a period of fifty-
two (52) consecutive weeks, except that an employee may reserve eighty (80) hours of accrued
paid leave benefits during a family leave absence. During a family leave period, the Employer
shall continue the employee's health insurance benefits on the same basis as active employees.
The Employer may recapture any premiums paid if the employee fails to return for reasons other
than the serious health conditions of the employee or immediate family member.
12.7 Court Appearance — An employee who is required to serve on a jury or as a result of official duties
is required to appear before a Court, Legislative Committee, or quasi-judicial body as a witness in
response to a subpoena or other directive, shall be authorized leave with pay. When summoned
and serving for jury service the Employer may, at its discretion, request that an employee be
excused or delayed from jury duty when the employee's absence would adversely affect business
needs. The employer is required to report to work at the City following jury selection if not serving
as a juror or on days when court is in recess. The employee must complete a Leave of Absence
Request form (signed by the supervisor or his designee) and attach the Jury Summons.
12.8 Military Leave — Military duty shall be granted in accordance with applicable law. Employees on
military duty shall suffer no loss of pay and medical benefits for the initial three (3) months.
ARTICLE XIII HEALTH AND WELFARE INSURANCE BENEFITS
13.1 The Employer shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the premium necessary to maintain the
present level of benefits for each full-time employee (and dependents, where applicable) under
the following Association of Washington Cities Employee Benefits Trust:
Medical — Washington Physicians Service Plan B
Dental — Washington Dental Service Plan A, with Plan III Orthodontia
Vision — Vision Service Plan, with ten dollars (S10.00) deductible.
13.2 All regular part-time employees shall receive monetary credit to be applied toward insurance
premium on a pro-rata basis in proportion to the number of hours worked. The amount received
by the employee is allocated according to family status identified above, i.e. employee, employee
+ spouse, etc.
13.3 Life Insurance - The Employer shall maintain Group Basic Life Insurance coverage for each
employee in the amount of ten thousand dollars (S10,000) payable to a beneficiary designated by
the employee.
AGREEMENT 2003 - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PUBLIC WORKS)
04/05/2004 DRAFT
PAGF 6
13.4 Long Term Disability - The Employer shall continue the long-term disability program, which
was in effect at the execution of this Agreement.
ARTICLE XIV UNIFORMS CLOTHING AND TRAINING
14.1 The Employer agrees to provide each maintenance employee with five (5) shirts, five (5) pairs of
pants, one (1) jacket, and two (2) sweatshirts yearly. In addition, effective date of signing, the
Employer will provide each public works employee a new, quality pair of work boots. These boots
will be replaced as needed but not more frequently than once every year.
14.2 The Employer shall reimburse employees for the cost of tuition and fees for job related
classes/courses not provided by the Employer; provided however,
(1) the employee has received prior approval from the City Manager;
(2) the maximum annual reimbursement shall be five hundred dollars ($500.00) per
employee; and
(3) the employee has received a grade of "C° or better, or P in a "pass/fail' system.
14.2.1 The Employer shall provide to all maintenance employees adequate protective clothing, such as
gloves, safety glasses, rain gear, rain boots, etc. at no cost to the employee, based on Director of
Public Works approval.
ARTICLE XV PROBATIONARY PERIOD LAYOFF RECALL AND JOB VACANCIES
15.1 Probation Period - A new employee shall be subject to a six (6) month probation period
commencing with the most recent date of hire. During the probation period, the employee shall be
considered on trial and subject to discharge at the sole discretion of the Employer. Discharge
during the probation period shall not be subject to the grievance procedure.
15.2 Seniority -An employee's seniority shall be defined as that period from the employee's most
recent first day of compensated work within the bargaining unit.
15.2.1 An employee's seniority shall be broken so that no prior period of employment shall be counted
and his seniority shall cease upon:
Justifiable discharge
Voluntary quit, or
Layoff of twelve (12) months or longer.
15.2.2 In layoff, recall permanent job vacancies, the Employer shall give consideration to an employees
length of continuous service with the Employer and his ability to performed the duties required in
the job. In applying this provision, it is the intent to provide qualified employees with opportunities
for promotion and the Employer with efficient operations.
15.3 Layoff — In case of a layoff, the employee with the shortest length of continuous service within the
work group shall be laid off first. The Employer shall provide an employee with four (4) weeks
advance notification prior to layoff.
15.4 Recall — In case of recall, those employees within the work group laid off last shall be recalled
first. An employee on layoff must keep both the Employer and the Union informed of the address
and telephone number where he can be contacted.
AGREEMENT 2003 - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PUBLIC WORKS)
04i052004 DRAFT
TIA(TE
15.5 Job Vacancies — When a permanent job vacancy occurs, present employees shall be given first
consideration for filling the vacancy, based on their length of service with the Employer and ability
to perform the duties of the job.
15.5.1 Notice of permanent job vacancies shall be posted on the bulletin board for seven (7) days.
Present employees who desire consideration for such opening shall notify the Employer in writing
during the seven (7) day period the notice is posted.
ARTICLE XVI DISCHARGE AND DISCIPLINE
16.1 The Employer shall not discharge nor suspend a permanent employee without just cause, but in
respect to discharge or suspension shall give at least one (1) warning letter of the complaint
against such employee to the employee in writing and a copy of the same to the Union, except
that no warning letter need be given to an employee before he is discharged or suspended if the
cause of such discharge or suspension is for theft, gross insubordination, drunkenness on duty,
and/or issues of parallel magnitude. Warning letters to be considered as valid, shall be issued
within thirty (30) days after the occurrence or knowledge of the occurrence of the violation claimed
by the Employer in such warning letter.
ARTICLE XVII GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
17.1 Grievance Defined - A grievance is hereby defined as a dispute over the interpretation or
application of any of the specific provisions of this Agreement. Grievances shall be processed in
accordance with the procedures set forth below.
17.1.1 Step 1 - The grievant shall, within fifteen (15) days from the time the complaint arose or should
have been reasonably known to exist, orally present the alleged grievance to the employee's
supervisor. If the grievance is adjusted orally, the disposition shall be reduced to writing and
subject to the final approval of the City Manager and the Union.
17.1.2 Step 2 - If no settlement is reached at Step 1, the grievance shall be reduced to writing, dated and
signed by the employee(s) involved and/or the Union, and shall state the specific factual basis of
the grievance, the provision or provisions of the Agreement allegedly violated, and the remedy
sought. Such grievance shall be submitted to the City Manager within fifteen (15) days of the
decision reached by the supervisor. Representative(s) of the Union will be present at any meeting
called to consider the grievance at this Step 2. The City Manager shall send a written answer to
the Union within fifteen (15) calendar days of receipt.
17.1.3 Step 3 - If no settlement is reached at Step 2, the Union in its sole discretion may, within fifteen
(15) days of the receipt of the Step 2 answer, invoke arbitration by requesting a list of at least
seven (7) arbitrators from the Public Employment Relations Commission. The arbitrator shall be
chosen by the parties alternately striking such list. Only grievances which are presented to the
Employer In writing during the term of this Agreement shall be subject to arbitration. The decision
of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties, provided however, no arbitrator shall
have the authority to render a decision or award which modifies, adds to, subtracts from, changes
or amends any term or condition of this Agreement.
17.1 A The cost of services of the arbitrator shall be shared equally by the parties. All other costs (such
as attorney fees, witness time, transcripts, etc.) shall be borne separately by the party incurring
the expense.
17.2 Time Limits — Any grievance not presented to the Employer within the time frames specified
above shall be null and void. Time limits described herein may be extended by mutual agreement
of the parties.
AGREEMENT 2003 - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PUBLIC WORKS)
04/05r2004 DRAFT
PALL S
ARTICLE XVIII SAVINGS CLAUSE
18.1 Should any provision of this Agreement and/or any attachments hereto be held invalid by
operation of Law or by any tribunal of competent jurisdiction or if compliance with or enforcement
of any provision should be restrained by such tribunal, the remainder of this Agreement and/or
any attachments hereto shall not be affected thereby and the parties shall enter into immediate
collective bargaining negotiations for the purpose of arriving at a mutually satisfactory
replacement of such provisions and/or any attachment hereto.
ARTICLE XIX COMPLETE AGREEMENT
19.1 The parties acknowledge that each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands
and proposals with respect to any matter deemed a proper subject to collective bargaining.
The results of such negotiations are set forth in writing in this Agreement. The Employer and
Union each voluntarily and unqualifiedly agree to waive the right to bargaining over any other
subjects for the duration of this Agreement unless mutually agreed otherwise.
ARTICLE XX PAST PRACTICES
20.1 Any and all verbal agreements previously entered into by the parties hereto are mutually cancelled
and suspended by the Agreement. Unless specifically provided herein to the contrary, past
practices shall not be binding on the Employer.
ARTICLE XXI DURATION
21.1 This Agreement shall be effective January 01, 2003 and shall remain in full force and effect
through December 31, 2005, unless otherwise provided for herein and shall remain in effect
during the course of negotiations on a new Agreement.
21.2 Within four (4) months prior to the termination date of this Agreement, the Union or the Employer
shall open this Agreement for the purpose of renegotiating changes in the Agreement.
21.3 Upon completion of a Compensation Study in 2004, the City will evaluate the compensation of
employees in classifications, which are determined to be below competitive compensation levels
of comparable positions in comparable cities, for the purpose of determining appropriate and
reasonable options for compensation adjustments, which shall be paid, should a wage disparity
be discovered. Compensation adjustments may include, but shall not be limited to, one-time lump
sum ' catch-up phased annual adjustments, or other options, which are mutually agreed to by
Union and Employer. In no event, will compensation be reduced as a result of the Compensation
Study.
AGREEMENT 2003 - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PUBLIC WORKS)
04,W2004 DRAFT
I'AGL 9
PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL & OFFICE -CLERICAL
EMPLOYEES AND DRIVERS LOCAL UNION NO.
763, affiliated with the International Brotherhood
of Teamsters
Lax
DAVID GRACE, Secretary -Treasurer
Date
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON
M
DOUGLAS J. SCHULZE, City Manager
Date
AGREEMENT Zoos - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PUBLIC WORKS)
04,05/2004 DRAFT
P_ACiE 10
APPENDIX "A"
to the
AGREEMENT
by and between
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON
and
PUBLIC PROFESSIONAL & OFFICE -CLERICAL EMPLOYEES AND DRIVERS
LOCAL UNION NO. 763
(Representing the Public Works Employees)
January 01, 2003 through December 31, 2005
THIS APPENDIX is supplemental to the AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF MEDINA,
WASHINGTON, hereinafter referred to as the Employer, and PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL & OFFICE -
CLERICAL EMPLOYEES AND DRIVERS LOCAL UNION NO. 763. affiliated with the International
Brotherhood of Teamsters. hereinafter referred to as the Union.
A,1 Effective January 01, 2003, the classifications of work and monthly rates of pay for such
classifications shall be increased by four percent (4%) above the 2002 rates as follows:
STEP A
STEP B
STEP C
STEP D
CLASSIFICATION
00-12m
13-24m
25-36m
37 m +
Maintenance Worker
3435
3584
3806
4006
Maintenance Supervisor
4223
4445
4679
4924
A.2 Effective January 01, 2004, the rates of pay which were effective as of January 01, 2003, shall be
increased by one hundred percent (100%) of the increase in the Seattle Area Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), All Items Revised Series (182- 84=100), as published by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the period from June 2002 to June 2003.
A.3 Effective January 01, 2005, the rates of pay which were effective as of January 01, 2004. shall
be increased by one hundred percent (100%) of the increase in the Seattle Area Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), All Items Revised Series (1982- 84=100), as published
by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the period from June 2003 to June 2004.
A.4 The rate of pay set forth within Sections A.1, A.2 and A.3 reflect a full-time, forty (40) hours per
week position. The monthly rates of pay for part-time employees shall be pro -rated based on
hours worked.
A.5 Longevity Pay — All employees shall receive monthly Longevity Pay in addition to their monthly
rates of pay as follows:
Service Time Percentage of Base Monthly Wage
After 4 years 2%
After 8 years 4%
After 12 years 6%
AGREEMENT 2003 - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PHRLIC WORKS)
04/05/2004 DRAFT
PROF l I
A.6 Education Pav—All employees shall receive monthly Education Pay in addition to their monthly
rates of pay for education achievement in approved fields of job -related studies as follows
College Achievement
45 Credits
AA Degree
135 Credits
BA/BS Degree
PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL & OFFICE -CLERICAL
EMPLOYEES AND DRIVERS LOCAL UNION NO.
763, affiliated with the International Brotherhood
of Teamsters
DAVID GRAGE, Secretary -Treasurer
Date
Monthly Amount
S 45
$ 90
S135
$180
a
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON
DOUGLAS J SCHULZE, City Manager
Date
AGREEMENT 2003 - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PUBLIC WORKS)
04,05,2004 DRAFT
ADDENDUM
to the
AGREEMENT
by and between
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON
and
PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL & OFFICE -CLERICAL EMPLOYEES AND DRIVERS
LOCAL UNION NO. 763
(Representing the Public Works Employees)
January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2005
THIS APPENDIX is supplemental to the AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF MEDINA,
WASHINGTON, hereinafter referred to as the Employer, and PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL &
OFFICE -CLERICAL EMPLOYEES AND DRIVERS LOCAL UNION NO. 763, affiliated with the
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, hereinafter referred to as the Union.
It is understood and agreed by and between the Employer and the Union that "Appendix" shall
be amended so as to include the following:
A.3 Effective January 1, 2004, the rates of pay which were effective as of January 1,
2003, shall be increased by one hundred percent (100%) of the increase in the
Seattle Area Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), All Items
Revised Series (182-84=100), as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, for
the period from June 2002 to June 2003.
STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D
CLASSIFICATION 00-12m 13-24m 25-36m 37 m +
Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Supervisor
3504 3656 3882 4086
4307
PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL & OFFICE -CLERICAL
EMPLOYEES AND DRIVERS LOCAL UNION NO.
763, affiliated with the International Brotherhood
of Teamsters
0
DAVID GRAGE, Secretary -Treasurer
Date
4534 4773 5022
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON
By
DOUGLAS J. SCHULZE, City Manager
Date
AGREEMENT 2003 - 2005
CITY OF MEDINA (PUBLIC WORKS)
04/052004 DRAFT
P.AGG I_
ITEM J - 7
�yofM"!f
CITY OF MEDINA
City Manager's Office
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
vjww.medina-wa.gqv
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 5, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager
RE: 2003 — 2005 Police Labor Agreement
RECOMMENDATION: Approve 2003 — 2005 Police Labor Agreement.
POLICY IMPLICATION: The Labor Agreement establishes wages, benefits, and working conditions
for police officers. The Police Officers previous labor agreement expired
December 31, 2002. The proposed labor agreement is a three-year
contract, which will expire December 31, 2005.
BACKGROUND: The Labor Agreement discussed with the City Council during the March 22,
2003 Study Session was presented to representatives of the Police
Officers on March 30`�. The police officers are prepared to accept the
agreement with a couple modifications, which will be discussed in
Executive Session prior to action on this item.
Financial Heafth of a City
• Revenue Indicators
• Expenditure Indicators
• Cash Solvency
• Budgetary Solvency
• Long -run Solvency
• Service -level Solvency
Financial C-kallenges
• Can the City continue to pay f ur on-
going operations?
• Are there adequate reserves or other
methods for financing emergencies?
• Is there enough financial flexibility to al
us to adjust to changes`?
• Can the City pay for our more capital -
intensive goals?
Cash Solvency
2004 1st Qua ft�ar-,Performance
• Projected Revenues versus AcNAct
evenues
%h�
• Budgeted Expenditures versus
Expenditures
• Change in Fund Balances
Revenue Performance
• Sales & Use Taxes are ahead of budget
projections, but below 2003 1 �t Quarter;
• Building Permits are S51,000 below budget
projections.
Expenditure Rerformance
• lsr Quarter Expenditures are Lin budget
by $305,323;
• Salaries & Wages and Personnel Ben
are slightly over budget as a result of la
labor contract settlements & retroactive
(1 /1/2003);
• No significant concerns identified.
4
M M CO O r M r- r- O N
(O I- (0 00 I--
V M O
(O O CO r� CO r
LO m 00 M I` N O V M m
co O 00 r� O
M Ln (3)
LO O I- N (0 r
co- I� 00 CO 0 0 (fl V Cl
LO CY) (D M Ln
(` N m
V V N (D LO
M❑
co I- O r- O r- G) r- N
Cl)❑
CO 'IT V r- M
M M
(O C r
O
LO 00 r f-- N T
O
CT N r V
N N
N N Ln fl
r
M Cl) 00
N }
M
V) 69 (a V) V) V) V) V) V) Ef)
V) 69 V) V) V)
V) V) V)
V) V) V) V) V) fi>
N
N
M
o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0
o
o o
CD
o
N V (N0
Co
L N
�
M co
co > O N N
o
V O N O V r-_r
co N (D(0
❑ (V V r
0
0
N
r O O r 0 t` O W O Ln
M M O LO O (O O CO O N
N
O O O O O
O O O O O
O O O
O Ln Ln
N O O O N
00 LO O O 00
70
V V N V O V N= N Ln
06 O M O
-6
O O Ln O LO
Ln N I-
N ' I` Ln O 1l�
� m
r V CP co Cn Ln
V O M O) M O I` CO
CDm
CD N Ln I-
0 LO r I-- CO
r �
LC) LO
CO C M r cD
Lf) N V N
N ❑
co M Cl)CD
r-
N ❑
c- N V
(�
%
}
M V) V) V) 69 V) V) V) V) fA
}
V) V) V) V) 69
V) V) 69
V) VA V) M (fi EA
W Q
�
W
D
O Ln C 00 M M _ N N
N
O M CO r—
O 6) O
N O M CO 0) O
_
O.'
CD
T) N ti M O) N Q) M Ln O
In O Q) L(") N
W
Cr O I,- 'IT
O M I� V
(O LO G)
co Ln 6)
co O 00 N O O'
CO M t` O
N
Q 2
F ❑�
V V' N I- N O 0) Ln O
❑ T❑,
N V Ln CO
M
0 O F-
Cl)LnO M r M co co 00
'... W �
0 C) LM
c co
O O
(fl Ln Ln I- V c0
Cl) 00 co O
(6
r
[-
00
F W
W
W
E
Cl)
/)
p
X
V) V) V) 69 V) V) V) V) V) fR
V) V) V) V3 V)
(» (» (»
(» u� c» c» c-� F».
cn
LL D
"...W
p�
O Ln V I` M M I` , N N
(O (O 00 —
0 0 0
N O M co m 0
I- N I- co m N m Il_ L) alV
M M r(O
Ln —
co O 00 00 O T
LO 'It V r I, O O LO N
[- O M I-- V
co LO 0)
M C:) co r- O) M
V V V N N CT c Ln O
Ln CD CO M
N
N V Ln M
(D (D
co Ln Ln r- V c0
0 M O
O O — M
O O
M co M O r
Ll
Cl) Cl) O
�- M , Ln
00
Q
r
O
V) V) U) V) V) V) V) V) V)fA
V) V) V) (1) V)
co (n V)
V) V) V) V) 69 6q
W
H
Q W W S W
Ln
z0co
a_
LLI LU
�LLJ
O
v.-n U u @ °
ZO
N0
w
>0LL
❑(
w 05 Iz E
Li
x
(n
U)
O L� w
(D
LLJO
u
U)
w
n co
Lu
OW Z
(DLU
w 1W
0) t�
U)
z '
LLJ
X U
> .E t � a
U
(B N w
Q) a) J
(D >
z
w
( O ELU
� m
m
J
z¢Li LU
o a) (n 00
J
L� m w
H
2
m m
_cm
O �-
L Q= 0 -Q Q 0-o
a E
a E
F
c0 �
(ndm0ln C)C)
din C>�
mQ
�''
Item J - 8a
FUND/DEPARTMENT
Legislative
Executive
Finance
Legal Services
Central
Police
Fire & Medical Aid
Emergency Preparedness
Building
Planning
Recreation
Parks
TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET
TRANSFERS OUT (G. FUND)
Equipment Replacement
Streets
Park Debt Service
Capital Projects
Bond Redemption
TOTALGENERALFUND
OTHER FUNDS
First
2004
2004
2003
Quarter
YTD
YTD
Budget
% of Budget
YTD
S 9,103
$ 9,103
$
11,786
77%
$ 3,537
S 31,281
$ 31,281
$
32,605
96%
$ 29,708
S 17,811
$ 17,811
$
17,948
99%
$ 19,457
S 44,713
$ 44,713
$
28,375
158%
$ 22,860
S161,365
$ 161, 365
$
172,122
94%
$ 154,669
$273,921
$273,921
$
285,319
96%
$293,226
$ -
S -
S
140,516
0%
$ -
$ 15,173
$ 15,173
S
10,000
152%
$ -
$105,849
$105,849
S
94.400
112%
$ 124,463
$ 60,582
$ 60,582
S
84,781
71%
$ 49,209
$ -
$ -
S
-
0%
$
$ 65,580
$ 65,580
S
92,675
71%
$ 71,410
$ 785,378
$ 785,378
$
970,527
81 %
$ 768,539
$ -
$ -
S
-
0%
$ -
S
$
S
0%
$
$
$
S
0%
$
$
$
S
0%
$
S
$
$
-
0%
$ -
$ 785,378
$ 785,378
$
970,527
0%
$ 768,539
Equipment Replacement
S
34,419
$
34,419
S
68,838
50% $
Streets
S
62,679
$
62,679
S
124,870
50% $
Park Debt Service
$
9,097
$
9,097
S
9,200
99% $
Tree Fund
$
2,908
$
2,908
S
20,515
14% $
Capital Projects
$
35,552
S
35,552
S
85,200
42% S
2,034
77,336
9,097
2,480
TOTAL $ 930,033 $ 930,033 $ 1,279,150 73% $ 859,486
2004 ITEM J - 9
Citv Council Calendar
i March 8, 2004
Regular
Meeting
! March 22, April 12, 2004
2004 Study Regular
Session _ Meeting
April 26, 2004
Study Session
84" Ave Trees
Completed
Action
Boarding Houses
Discussion
Building Code Update
Discussion
CIP/TIP - 2005 - 2010
Citizen Request for
Refund
Discussion
Discussion
City Facilities
City Mgr P.I.P.
Moved forward
Discussion
Compensation Study
Discussion
- -
Council Annual Retreat
Completed
Council Policy Manual
Moved forward
Action
Financial Report - 15`
Quarter
Discussion
Health Insurance Costs
Discussion
Intersection Sight
Distance
Tabled
Discussion
Jail Assembly
Appointment
Approved
Discussion
Medina Beach Project
Mgmt Employment
Agreements
Discussion/Action
NE 12'0 Project
Approved
Park Board
Appointments
Completed
Park Board Ord Amend
Adopted
I
Park Property
Acquisition
Discussion/Action
Moved forward Action
Police Labor Agreement Tabled
Pool/Spa Locations
_
Public Works Labor Approved
Agreement
Regional Comm JPA !! Approved
School Zoning Adopted
Action
_
!
_
Sideyard
_Setbacks
Site Plan Review
Moved forward
j
.-Weymouth Rezone
Denied
- --
---
04/07/2004
Page 1 of 2
P:\2004 Agenda Packets\04122004 Agenda Packet\Item J-9, Council Agenda Calendar.doc
2004
City Council Calendar
ITEM J - 9
Description
May 10, 2004 May 24, 2004
Regular Study Session
Meeting
June 14, 2004 June 28, 2004
j Regular Study Session
i Meeting
Budget Goals - 2005
Discussion
Building Code Update
Action
I- -
Building Permit Process
Discussion
Cable TV Franchise
Discussion
CIP/TIP — 2005 - 2010
Discussion
Action
City Facilities
City Manager
Performance Review
Discussion
Intersection Sight Dist
Hearing/Action
Medina Beach Project
_
Planning Commission
Appointments
Discussion/Action
Pool/Spa Locations
Discussion
Sideyard Setbacks
Discussion
Site Plan Review
Discussion
SR-520 Project
Discussion/Action
Work Plan - 2005
Discussion/Action
04/07/2004 Page 2 of 2
P:\2004 Agenda Packets\04122004 Agenda Packet\Item J-9, Council Agenda Calendar.doc
CITY OF MEDINA
w" Evergreen Point Road, Medina. WA 98039
(425) 454-9222 www.ci.medina.wa.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 9, 2004
THRU: City Manager
TO: City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works
RE: Public Works Activity Report
Item H-3, Public Works Activity Report, was not included in the recent read -
ahead packet for the upcoming City Council meeting (April 12, 2004). Enclosed
is a copy of Itern H-3.
ITEM H - 3
CITY OF MEDINA
Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039
rti (425) 454-9222 www.ci.medina.wa.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 8, 2004
THRU: City Manager
TO: City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works
RE: Public Works Activity Report
1. Attached is the Public Works Activity Report for the period 1 — 29 February
and 1 - 31 March 2004.
2. The intent of this report is to provide the City Manager and City Council with a
narrative description of the primary activities occurring within the Public Works
Department over the included period.
ITEM H - 3
CITY OF MEDINA
501 Fveri-,rcen Point Road • P.O. Box 1.44 • Medina, WA 980)9-0144
Telephone 425-454-9222 Fax 425-454-8450 • Police 425-454-1332
MEDINA PUBLIC WORKS
ACTIVITY REPORT
(1 - 29 February & 1 - 31 March 2004)
This report describes the activities of the City of Medina Public Forks (PW) Department
for the period shown.
1. Routine Public Works Maintenance — General parks. streets and building
maintenance work has picked up considerably over the past couple of months primarily
because of the better- than usual spring v,°cather. MoNv in,-) and weeding requirements hate
increased significantIN. Additionally. parks usage is up whir-h also increases the general
Maintenance workload. The Public Works Crew (P%VC) is %Norking very hard on
preparing our Parks. streets, street planter snips. plantings and side�kalks for
the summer season. Most of the Parks floNser and shrub beds have been sprayed for
weeds and pre -emergent weed control material has been placed.
2. Public Works Maintenance and Repair Projects, Special Activities --
,,I. The PWC has spent literally hundreds of hours oyer the past two months
focusing on the appearance of Vievtipoint Park, the traffic triangle at 84'1' and Overtake
DriN e West, the 5-corners planting bed. the Beach Park garden area, the planting strips
atorig, several of our roads. and in general all of the pIantim, areas in all Parks. At
Vice°point Park. all of the old rotten railroad ties outlining the park and parking lot were
removed and replaced. if you have some time. please take a look at all of these locations
and give us your feedback.
b. Once again_ several more street identification. stop, speed limit. pedestrian
crossing. and construction related signs vHere repaired. straightened or newl' installed
around the Cite. Additionally. vegetation was cut back around several signs to help with
visihility. More pedestrian crossing down arrovys and crossing ahead signs wcre erected
— and we have several more to go throughout the Cite. As previously mentioned, this is a
never endinu task NNilh signs being hit or vandalized. and. in conjunction vN ith the PD_
erected as new safety requirements are determined, obserzed%recognized.
C. In support of the transportation traffic analysis for the new Medina
Flementary School. the Bellevue School District and their traffic consultant asked once
again if the Cite veould gather more traffic data utilizing the City's traffic data pads. This
was accomplished by the PWC for the District collecting data from Overlake Drive West
and aeain on NF: 8't' St.
ITEM H - 3
d. During Fehrnary and March. members of the PWC continued to participate in
the Cite Benefits Committee and the Employee Policy Manual Reyicva Committee.
e. As authorised in the 2004 budget. final selection of the replacement riding
moe%cr «gas made and ordered («e selected a lord model). w'e anticipate delirery in the
next week or so. The old mower was advertised and sold to the highest bidder.
f. Oyer the two month period. the PWC placed 16 postings for the Planning
Director for upcoming or continuing, land use hearings or actions. Additionall%. 7 trips
were made by a PWC crew member to the City's off -site storage facility (a Shurgard
facility-) to retrieve records as required by the Development Services Department.
g. In March all members of the PWC attended a day -long flagging course to
renew their jlagger certifications. Additionally. all PWC crew members attend a hall' day
first aid refresher course.
h. .As previously discussed with the Council. the PUiC planted a nice 6 inch red
oak tree in the right-of=%vay on NE 7"' St. Again. this tree is a replacement tree for the
maples and cherry trees which had been killed by girdling in September of 2002. More
landscaping work is scheduled for this right-of=yav area. Additionally 4 large arborvitae
trees were planted in the right-of-w°ay adjacent to 8345 Oyerlake DriN e West. The City
maintains an arborvitae screen at this location and 4 of the tees had died over the «inter.
i. fhe PWC constructed a suggestion box for the City Manager for placement in
City Hall. Additionally_ . the City Council chambers and City hall entrN way was
"relamped.'
j. The PWC made scecral improvements to the PW Shop over the last two
months. In addition to installing se%cral neu lights inside the Shop. a drip irrigation
system was placed along the outer fence of the PW Shop yard to help the new and future
fence screen plantings survive. Additionally. more fabric screening was placed on the
remaining portion of the shop fence to help hide the maintenance area from Medina Park.
k. The PWC finished the irrigation system work and brought in fill soil to
complete the landscaping kork around the ne�� sidcvtialk corner at 84°i Ave. .NF and M.
7'1' St.
3. Park Projects / Issues --
a. The Parks Commission now has three nee, members bringing the total to six.
An advertisement for the newly authorized seventh member has been placed in the
'Medina Quarterly. Three applications have been received thus far. The cut-off date for
applications is April 14"' at which time all applications will be forwarded to the Mayor
for selection of the seventh Commission member — in consultation with the rest of the
City Council.
ITEM H - 3
b. The old vvooden wall which used to run parallel to the stairs at the Community
Dock at Vievv,point Park was removed by the PWC. Additionally. some trimming of the
trees along the yvaterfront has been accomplished to improve the v iew and increase the
light getting into the Dock Park area. Additional improvements to the Dock Park will be
made later this summer.
c. The memorial plaques for the mo new nemorial trees donated by N;Iedina Park
users were installed under the newly planted trees. PW yvas recentle contacted be \ct
another resident who would like to donate a tree to Medina Park. The PWC has been
working with this resident on selecting an appropriate tree and location.
d. Again_ the four pair of I leron's have returned from last year to their nests in
Medina Park. much to the delight of Park patrons and bird enthusiasts.
e. The Parks Commission has decided to address the challenge we constantl%
have vv ith dogs having free run of all of Medina Park and al I of the associated problems.
fhe Commission vJll be vwrking on a draft ordinance proposal for City Council
consideration to make some changes to dog control rules for Medina Park.
f. As requested br a Council member. Parking for Park I se Only signs have been
placed in the two parking lots at Medina Park and the parking lot at Fairyveather ]'ark and
Nature Preserve_
o. The Parks Commission has reviewed the neva Parks and Recreation
Commission ordinance recently passed br the City Council. The Commission vwill be
drafting some proposed changes to the nevv ordinance for C:�uncil consideration.
n. The PWC removed and repaired a portion of the )uttlovN weir on the louver or
southern pond in Medina Park.
4. Capital Improvement Plan (('IP) Projects —
a. Information on the status of the 'Medina Beach Park Bulkhead Rehab and
General lniprovements Project is pro,°ided at Itern J-5 in the Council Packets in
preparation 1Or the April 1 "I' City Council meeting.
h. As previous)} reported. King County Road Services Division completed the
major repair work on the tyvo Overlake DriN e East bridges on December 19`�'. lfimccer.
some final finishing work such as painting the nevv steel piles had not vet been
accomplished. This work is novv complete.
c. As approved by the City Council at the March 8`1' Council Meeting. the
contract for the NF 12"i St. and lake Washington Blvd Pay ement Rehabilitation 2004
CIP project la joint project with the Cite of Clyde Hill) has been signed by the Cite
Manager. A notice to proceed will soon be issued to the contractor and construction is
expected to take place during the May to July timeframe. In general, this project is on
track and proceeding eery well.
ITEM H - 3
d. The PWC continues to work the final landscaping phase ofthe 200; Indian
I rail Drainage Improvement project. I he ney% pathwa% is currentl% being placed and
coordination has been made with all adjacent homeowners. Work on this project will
continue into the spring and summer.
5. Committee and Seminar/Workshop and Training Atl�endance
a. The DPW recently attended a seminar on Current Issues in Washington Storm
Water Re,,ulations. This was an excellent seminar %which brought the DPW up to date on
all the latest relative to implementing the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Phase 11 requirements in the City of Medina.
b. As a member of the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project I echnical
Committee, the DPW attended an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Methodologies
Meetintl at WSDOT on March 30`t. Some good updates on the status of the project v%ere
obtained. The issue of the Cit% of Medina becoming a "Cooperating Agency' in this
process was once again discussed. Giy°en the new direction in this project and
consideration of se%°cral outstanding policy questions. plus .he changes in membership of
the Medina Cite Council, discussion of the SR 520 project ias been added to the Ma%
10'l, Citv Council meeting agenda (pending CC approval of the agenda).
c. WSDO I held its first SR 520 Bridoe Replacement and HOV Project Eastside
Community Roundtable meeting on March I". In attenda�ice from Medina v%ere Mayrn
Odermat, Council Member Rudolph. DPW Jahn. and Medina residents Laurel Preston
and Steve Broback v ho were appointed b% tilt: CC to sit on this citizen roundtable
committee. Doug Phelps. another Medina resident, also attended the meeting. file
primary focus of this gathering yeas to discuss design alternati%es and location of the
three proposed eastside "lids" for the new SR 520 project.
6. Other -
a. Council members recent]} expressed concerns about the fumes from
Belleyue's Sanitary Sewer auxiliary emergency generator located next to City Hall
(getting into the building and creating an unacceptable and unhealthy em ironment during!
the %yeekly check-out start-ups. The DPW has been ,vorkinu %%ith BellevLie t_ltilities to
solee the problem. The generator was recenth ser%iced and tine -tuned in an effort to
reduce the emissions from the exhaust. Additionally_ a ney� run-up schedule has been
initiated which has the generator automatically coming on each week %yell before City
Hall business hours. Hopefully these changes %will eliminate the problem.
b. The PWC continues to work the plantings committed to during the 2002-200:
PSF. vegetation management project. For CC intormation. 484 trees were removed b%
PSE from under the power lines throughout the City during the project. Approximatcl%
152 stumps were ground. Since starting the replanting. the PWC has now planted
approximately 108 trees. 109 hedge plants (trees). and 65 shrubs. Our best estimate is
that we are currentl} approximate]} 4011,40 done yyith all of the promised plantings. Given
the scope, complexity and other challenges associated %yith this effort, it is clear that this
project %gill now continue well into the Call and %%inter of 2004 - _1005.
ITEM H - 3
c. A third 84"' Ave. NL ! Oyerlake (Jolt and COtmtr} Club " St. Thomas Church
tree project joint committee meeting was recently held. Additional ini'ormation was
gathered by the City° representatives. 1 he nest step is to reach consensus within the CC
relatiN e to the direction the City wants to take on this project. Meanwhile. the DPIA is
waiting for funding approval from the CC' in order to perform the safetyrelated trimming
pruning of the poplar trees on 84"' Ave. NF: and NL 24'h St
d. Final permits from the Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department
of Fish and Wildlife were just received to do the repair work on the Lake Lane dock.
This is a project initiated in mid-200 ). Due to the restrictions o❑ in -water work during
the primary fish development season, the actual work on the dock will not be
accomplished until late summer. early fall.
e.hhe DPW has received bids on repairing and replacing the lanes and pedestrian
path markings (Raised Pavement Markers — RPMs) along ()verlake Drive Last and Wcst.
A best value contractor will soon be selected and this critical safety related work will be
accomplished.
f. O
The DPW has received a letter from the NAA Restoration Center
LarthCorps Partnership. The letter notifies the City that the proposed 2004 grant YundinL
for the stream work in Fairweather Nature Preserve was not approved. The reason given
is that there has been a change in police regarding which projects this partnership
program will support. The new focus is on direct benelits to liv°ing marine resources in
the Puget Sound region. Our project in,,olyes the restoration of valuable riparian
ycgetation areas to enhance the Preserve's wildlife species. steam water quality.
coniferous forest ground water, and wetland habitat, which used to be the type or kind of
projects eligible fir such grant money consideration. However. with the policy change.
our project no longer qualifies. The partnership recognizes the benefit of our proposed
ovork, however. since fish species are not currently entering this portion of our stream.
they could not support our request. Therefore. the DPW has been working with
EarthCorps to scale down the project and do at least a portion of the in -stream work
originally programmed w-ith the 2004 funding approved by the CC. Additionally.
GarthCarps will continue to do Preserve maintenance work to help control the invasive
plants as well as ensure the survival of the flew coniferous plantings. The DPW is
scheduled to meet with EarthCorps and State representativ,-'s to work out the scope of the
in -stream project as well as any permitting requirements.
g. The DPW. along with the Planning Director recently met yith representatives
from the Bellevue School District, their architect. and their traffic engineer to discuss
vehicular and pedestrian traffic flow and circulation associated with the new Medina
Elementary School. The District has developed a new traffic and pedestrian plan. as well
as overall layout design for the proposed school which attempts to take into account
many of the concerns raised by citizens. Cite staff. and Council members over the past
several months. This was just a general discussion meeting requested h% the District and
design team to review their new ideas and get City staff reaction and input. No decisions
nor specific feedback or direction were made or given by the staff. I lo\ticv er. in
reviewing the new proposal and the improved traffic % pedestrian flow concepts. the DPW
ITEM H - 3
Peels that the School District and their design team has come up with an alternative «hich
may be eery positively receitied by the communit} and the CC. It �v as also observed that
the District appears to be intently listening to the concerns obscryations being raised.
h. Fhe DPW and PWC recently observed that the outtlo�� streams from Medina
Park (bctxyeen the Park and NE 8"' St.) and the stream which llo,�ys from the golf course
under NE'_4"' St.. through Medina Circle and out to Fairweather Bay. Kaye silted up
siunificanth and are causing flooding problems for adjacen. properties. These streams
are a major part of the Cit}'s storm drain outtlo\� system. This is a recurring problem
crhich is addressed by dredging the streams. I -lie last time any of these streams were
dredged was at least tuelye years ago. PW will have to act into these streams this
summer during low water and clean them out. This tiyork will he costly and is another
unanticipatediunproL,rammed maintenance requirement.