Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-28-2004 - Agenda PacketMEDINA CITY COUNCIL STUD`( SESSION AGENDA June 28, 2004 7:00 p.m. 501 Evergreen Point Road Medina, WA A. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. B. ROLL CALL (Adam, Blazey, Nunn, Odermat, Phelps, Rudolph, Vail-Spinosa) C. ANNOUNCEMENTS 7:05 p.m. 1. Mayor 2. Council 3. Staff D. DISCUSSION 1. City Facilities 7:15 p.m. 2. City Manager Duties and Authority 7:45 p.m. 3. Historic Preservation Options 8:15 p.m. 4. 2004 Retreat Agreements 8:45 p.m. E. CADD ANIMATION PRESENTATION BY ARCHITECT FOR MEDINA ELEMENTARY F. ADJOURNMENT 9:00 P.M. ITEM D - 1 of M� CITY OF MEDINA City Manager's Office 501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222 _ .rnedina.Wa.gov MEMORANDUM DATE: June 16, 2004 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager RE: City Facilities RECOMMENDATION: Discussion item — provide staff direction for follow up. POLICY IMPLICATION: Preliminary design and planning process for potential facilities. BACKGROUND: The City Council has been involved in preliminary planning discussions related to City facility needs since 1996. In March 2000, the City Council reached consensus to proceed with the planning for a new law enforcement facility. The decision to proceed with planning for a new law enforcement facility was based on the following: • Need to provide safety of public and police personnel, as well as security of sensitive equipment and custodial property. • Need for adequate and secure "booking" and "holding" areas within the Medina Police Department. There have been an average of 125 arrest annually by the Medina Police Department since 1998. At the same time, the seriousness of the crimes confronting officers of this department escalated, and includes such crimes as possession of weapons, possession of drugs, domestic violence, possession of "silencers", possession of stolen property and drunk driving. Such contacts pose enormous risks for the officers and the ready availability of pertinent intelligence, as well as secure facilities to "hold" these arrestees while they are being searched, questioned and processed is essential. • Need for adequate and functional space. In addition to the need for a safe and secure facility, the police department does not have space for meals, showering, meeting, privacy, storage and supervisory activity. The lack of adequate and functional space directly impacts productivity and efficiency. As the planning process for a new law enforcement facility started, it was clear that site selection would be one of the most challenging aspects of the project. The scope of the project was expanded to consider needs of the entire organization, which included meeting space, storage, and an adequate emergency operations center. As discussions and planning proceeded, the need for non -police space was included. During the past seven years, the following facts have been identified: • The upper level (mezzanine) is not A.D.A. compliant and does not meet Fire Code standards for office space; • Private conference space is not available at Medina City Hall; • Parking space is not currently adequate for staff and beach users; • Space for building records storage is not adequate; • Current City Hall is more than 50 years old; • City Hall was remodeled in late 1980's; • City Hall is approximately 3,200 square feet including restrooms; • There are typically 10 employees working at City Hall during business hours and 2 or more consultants; • The Police Department occupies 1,047 square feet leaving 2,150 square feet for non -police activities. The Council Chamber accounts for more than 660 square feet leaving approximately 1,500 square feet for administration, planning and building functions. • The Council Chamber does not provide adequate space for public participation during meetings, which requires citizens to stand in the lobby and/or sit on the floor when more than 30 people attend a meeting. Frank Lawhead was hired to conduct a space needs analysis and assist with preliminary design work in 2001. Since that time, Mr. Lawhead has provided space needs information, programmatic drawings, assessment of several potential sites, and most recently, preliminary floor plan options for expansion of City Hall to accommodate non -police needs. The most difficult issue has been identification of an appropriate size or amount of space for City facilities. In addition, there has been a considerable amount of confusion regarding the outcomes of the space needs analysis and programmatic design. The space needs analysis suggests that the law enforcement facility needs are approximately 6,000 square feet as a stand-alone facility. The non -police space needs are equivalent to the police space needs as a stand-alone facility. 0 Page 2 How did we reach this conclusion? Based on standards used for public buildings, the following data has been used for space planning: Code Office Type Sq Footage Tenant PO-5a Private 320 CEO (mayor or city manager) PO-4 Private 224 Dept. Director with more than 10 staff PO-4a Private 192 Dept. Director with less than 10 staff PO-3 Private 168 Offices where confidential multi- party interviews occur PO-2a Private 140 Managers PO-2 Private 120 Persons who deal with confidential material and have some special furnishings PO-1 Private 100 Persons who deal with confidential materials and have basic furnishings OS-6 Open 144 Clerical Supervisor or Senior 120 Professionals who have some specialized furnishings OS-5 Open Receptionist without counter or Clerical with files, professional OS-3 Open 80 Typical Clerical Station The above data was applied to the staff positions as shown in the following table. Obviously, adjustments can be made, but during the initial planning stages it is best to start with the desirable space needs and reduce, if necessary rather than attempt to enlarge after budget estimates have been developed or final designs completed. • Page 3 Police Space Position Office Type I Code Sq Footage i Chief Private PO-4 I 224 Lieutenant Private PO-2a 140 Corporal Private PO-1 100 Records Mgr Open OS-5 120 Admin. Assistant Open OS-3 80 80 Police Officer Open OS-3 Police Officer Open OS-3 80 TOTAL OFFICE SPACE 824 Reception/Waiting 280 Booking 300 EOC/Traing/Conf 450 Kitchen 320 Interview #1 100 Interview #2 100 Property Storage 266 Evidence Storage General Storage Storage Staff Restroom ! 250 260 200 200 320 60 �I Staff Restroom Unisex Toilet Unisex Toilet 60 650 Sall Potarkin Y P 9 TOTAL NON -OFFICE SPACE 3,810 TOTAL COMBINED 4,630 0 Page 4 Non -Police Space Position City Manager Office Type Private Code Sq Footage PO-4 224 City Clerk Open OS-6 144 7 I.S. Coordinator Open OS-6 144 Admin Assistant Open OS-5 120 Finance Officer Private PO-2 120 Dir of Comm Dev Private PO-4a 192 Building Official Open OS-6 144 Planner Open OS-6 144 Building Inspector Open OS-3 80 Permit Coord Dir of PW i Engineering Tech Open i OS-5 Private PO 4a Open OS-6 120 192 144 TOTAL OFFICE SPACE Council Chamber 1,76 1,000 Conference �260�� Lobby/Waiting 200 Lunch Room i 240 Records Storage 350 General Storage 1400 Unisex Toilet 60 Unisex Toilet 60 I TOTAL NON -(OFFICE SPACE 21310 TOTAL COMBINED SPACE 4,078 ~I Circulation and miscellaneous space needs accounts for an additional 18% or 735 square feet. 0 Page 5 The attached Schematic Options were requested by the City Council over the course of the past three years. It is important to emphasis that the Schematic Options are only intended to show examples of how space might be designed; they are not meant to be design recommendations. Schematic Options 1 — 6 for the Medina Police Station show a stand-alone law enforcement building without a specific site. Schematic Options 1 — 8b for the Medina City Hall show use of the existing City Hall with various remodels and expansions. At this point, the next step is to identify the preferred options or combinations so preliminary design work can begin. As preliminary design progresses, site selection will need to be confirmed to make sure the design fits the size, shape and topography of the site. 0 Page 6 Medina Police Station Schematic Options 1-6 — Square Footage OPTIONS AREA (S.F.) I OPTION 1 — One Story • Square Footas e l,110 Total 7,j 10 2 OPTION 2 — One Story zv/ optional basement access • Squarc Footage 7,340 Total ...... 3 OPTION 3—IwoStory • Upper Floor - Square Footage t 516 • Lmv er Floor - Square Footage 3,1 Tot, I ...... 5,647 4 OPTION 4—T7vo Storm • Upper Floor Square Footage 2,538 • Lower floor - Squarc Footage 3,397 Total 5,935 5 OPTION 5—Two Storit • Upper Floor Square Footage 2,724 • Lower Floor - Square Footage 3,397 Total 0,121 6 OPTION 6 — Tzvo Story • Upper Floor Square Footage 2,�3s • Lower Floor - Square Footage 3,397 Total ...... 5,935 LAWHEAD A RUIIILC IS ■ swe= �r P. -C- F_ i. ,�- OPTION 1 LAWHEAD ARCHITECTS -- - --- .---- -._. -_ P.S. SCALE: 1 /16"=1'-0" 0 OPTION 2 SCALE. LAWHEAD ARCHITECIS P.S. ■ -, _: o �__ Q� T <_ C 2 _ W 1 � � � ■ � �ll J I� l M Z � w Q a �, `i O w J L W � _ J W O = w w O z , \ 2 ^ \ \\ LC « ue. � - _/£ ■ .... ..- . a � K} 2y � }\ \ : �\ �s Q Q V w - S " :J Medina City Hall Schematic Options 1-5 — Square Footage AWK91►0 AREA (S.F.) I OPTION 1 — zulElevator • Upper Floor - Square Footage 3,108 • Lower Floor - Square Footage 3,031 Total _. 6.139 2 OPTION 2 — w10 Elevator Upper Floor Square Footage 3,025 • Lo%v er Floor - Square Footage 2,904 Total ...... 5,979 3 OPTION 3 — wlElevator Upper Floor Square Footage 3,108 • Lower Floor - Square Footage 3,031 Total ...... 0,139 4-11 01'1ION 4 —A zelElevalor Upper Floor - Square Footage 3,108 • Lov,,er Floor - Square Footage 3,031 Total 6,139 4-B OPTION 4 —B zu/o Elevator • Upper Floor Square Footage 3,000 • Lower Floor - Square Footage 2,954 Total 5,954 OPTION 5 — wlElevator • Upper Floor Square Footage • I_.ower Floor - Square Footage 3,307 Total 6,531 LAWHEAD a runre��iti ■ Medina City Hall Schematic Options 6-8 — Square Footage LAWHEAD d RC I II TECTS 1, ■ OPTIONS AREA (S.F.) EXISTING BUILDING • Upper Floor - Square Footage 826 • Main Floor - Square Footage 1,700 • Lower Floor - Square Footage 1,743 Total .... 4,269 6 OPTION 6 - zo/ Elevator _ • Upper Floor - Square Footage 870 • Main Floor - Square Footage 2,822 • Lower Floor - Square Footage 2,787 Total .... 6,479 7 OPTION 7 - w/o Elevator • Upper Floor -Square Footage 826 • Main Floor - Square Footage 1,700 • Lower Floor - Square Footage 1,743 Total .... 4,269 8A OPTI.ON 8A - zo/Elevator • Upper Floor - Square Footage 1,258 • Main Floor - Square Footage 2,437 • Lower Floor - Square Footage 2,480 Total .... 66 175_ 8B OPTION 813 - w/ Elevator • Upper Floor - Square Footage 1,385 • Main Floor - Square Footage 2,255 • Lower Floor - Square Footage 2,293 Total .... 5,933 I t-- 71 r- a Fy I -/ Lower Floor MAIN Floor EXISTING / PROGRAM SCALE- 1'16'-1'-0" LAWHEAD ARC HITEC"CS P.S. 0 Lower Floor OPTION I MAIN Floor SCALE. I'l W-1'-0' LAWHEAD ARCHITECTS P.S. ■ \ 'fie- •_____. , Lower Floor Lower Floor LAWHEAD ARCHITECTS P.S. ■ q i Lower Floor G mi MAIN Floor LAWHEAD OPTION 4 - A ARCHITECTS - - - - P.S. SCALE 1,16°-1101 ■ j " Lower Floor OPTION 4 - B MAIN Floor SCALE. 1 i 16"=1'-0" LAWHEAD ARCHITECTS P.S. ■ Lower Floor OPTION 5 MAIN Floor SCALE 1:16'=1 -0" LAWHEAD ARCHITECTS _ - P.S. ■ .ip i o - --' -�_ = r Lower Floor e " .. L MAIN Floor OPTION 6 SCALE 1/16'=' ' a,amq. x k 4 LAWHEAD ARCHITECTS - P.S. Upper Floor Lower Floor MAIN Floor LAwHE 4n OPTION 7 A RC HI"IEC T9 SCALE tt6'�' C, r� Upper Floor -- -- - - Lower Floor E. EA MAIN Floor OPTION 8A SCALE 1 /'. C'=r -C' LAWHEAD ARCHITECTS P.S. tea. — -- -- --- Upper Floor r i �T� LL- �r E .. /5�� _... Lower Floor �I I i��, d MAIN Floor- LAWHEAD OPTION 8B AacxnECrs P.S. SCALE.�- ITEM D - 1A of MFo CITY OF MEDINA City Manager's Office 501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222 w w.medina-wa.gov MEMORANDUM DATE: June 22, 2004 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager RE: Parking Issues RECOMMENDATION: Develop a position regarding City Hall/Beach Park parking and provide staff with direction for future planning. POLICY IMPLICATION: Parking availability for public use of park space and customer access to City Hall as well as efficient use of staff/consultant time should be considered. BACKGROUND: The parking problems are not limited to City Hall/Medina Beach, but extend throughout the community. Most streets in Medina are minimal width and the unused right-of-way is typically landscaped rather than improved for on -street parking, sidewalks, etc. The Police Department must enforce parking regulations according to the adopted ordinances, which quite clearly states: • No person shall stand or park a vehicle in or adjacent to a roadway other than parallel with the edge thereof headed in the direction of lawful traffic movement and with all four wheels of the vehicle off the surfaced portion of the roadway, with these exceptions: (specific streets identified in MMC). • A limited exception may be secured on written permit of the police department for a significant assembly or gathering of people and according to the reasonable conditions and limitations thereof in respect to time, the hours of light and darkness, peak traffic conditions and reasonable access for emergency vehicles, especially firefighting equipment. • The city manager may, from time to time, designate areas within the city for permit parking only. ITEM D - 1A • The city manager may, from time to time, designate areas within the city for restricted parking. Restricted parking may include restrictions upon the length of time that a vehicle may be parked and restrictions upon the types of vehicles which may be parked such as "employee parking" or "police vehicles only." The Police Department has been very accommodating when residents exceptions for special events, if advanced notice is provided however complaints are frequently received from residents when vehicles are parked on streets or within public rights -of -way. A more specific problem exists during summer months at City Hall/Medina Beach. Typically, parking is extremely inadequate from Memorial Day through Labor Day when the swimming beach is heavily used. During this period of approximately ninety (90) days, park patrons, city hall customers, city staff and consultants compete for the limited parking spaces. The City Council position relative to this problem has fluctuated over the past eight years, if not longer. In 1996, at the time I was hired, the City Council explained that parking was intentionally limited for the purpose of discouraging non-resident use of the park/beach. Expansion of parking was viewed as an invitation for more people to use the park and swimming beach, which was considered to be an adverse impact on the community. During the past four or five years, there have been a few suggestions from members of the City Council that the parking shortage should be addressed, which led to the creation of the permit parking area north of Overlake Drive West along the west side of Evergreen Point Road, which is used by staff and consultants. The permit parking area did not create new parking spaces, but made the parking closest to City Hall and the beach available to park users. Within the past two years, at least one member of the City Council has suggested a policy to locate staff parking at a location away from City Hall, which would require a shuttle service to transport staff between City Hall and their vehicles. Due to the nature of several staff positions and the lack of a lunch facility, this could require numerous trips between the parking area and City Hall each day. The wasted time shuttling staff could amount to as much as two hours daily for some employees, if parking was available within five miles and a shuttle was always available when needed. The trash enclosure and portable office take up five parking spaces. When the trash enclosure was built, four additional parking spaces were created as part of the park expansion onto the former Dustin property. The net result was a gain of two parking space. The portable office was intended to be a temporary solution (one year) at the time it 0 Paye 2 ITEM D - 1 A was brought on site. Unfortunately, it has been in place almost two years and a permanent solution does not appear likely within the next few months at the earliest. The City Council should first determine if there is consensus that a parking problem exists. If consensus is reached that a parking problem exists, the next step should be to determine if there is consensus that the problem should be addressed. As I have previously stated, expansion of parking will most likely result in increased use of Medina Beach. As such, additional parking can be expected to fill up, which simply creates another shortage and more demand on the park, lifeguards and facilities. Options for consideration: 1. Address parking needs as part of the facility issue. This option will avoid temporary solutions and the potential of creating a conflict with future facility plans. Unfortunately, this may leave the problem unresolved for quite some time. 2. Expand parking into existing park space and street right-of- way. This option could add a few parking spaces, but would not meet the peak need during summer months. In addition, improvements could be very expensive considering the minimal gain due to slopes on the property and the need for retaining walls. 3. Off -site parking and shuttle for staff and consultants. This would be a very inefficient solution and costs to the City are estimated to be at least $10,000 for two months. Would require purchase or lease of a shuttle vehicle and a driver from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday —Friday. 4. Shuttle service during July/August from Medina Elementary, Bellevue Christian and along Evergreen Point Road for the public use. Would require purchase or lease of a shuttle vehicle and a driver from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday — Friday. 5. Do nothing. • Page 3 ITEM D - 2 ,t of MJ6 CITY OF MEDINA City Manager's Office 501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222 www.mediina-wa .qwv MEMORANDUM DATE: June 22, 2004 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager RE: Clarification of City Manager Contracting Authority RECOMMENDATION: Discussion and direction regarding clarification of contracting authority delegated to city manager. POLICY IMPLICATION: Delegation of City Council authority for entering into contracts and agreements. BACKGROUND: During the past year, questions have been raised regarding authority delegated to the city manager for entering into contracts and agreements. As a result of the increased level of concern regarding this matter, the City Attorney was asked to research the subject and provide an opinion, which is attached. As the City Attorney's memorandum concludes, "In order to avoid misunderstandings or confusion, many cities have drafted ordinances setting forth the extent of authority, which the council delegates to administrative staff.' Resolution No. 42 (attached) was adopted by the Medina City Council in 1961 and defines the duties of the city manager. The Resolution is clearly outdated, but it has not been rescinded or amended. For example, the resolution requires the city manager to "qualify himself to make plat, furnace, electrical and other inspections and make such inspections to insure compliance with the governing city ordinances, employing a licensed surveyor for the limited purpose of checking the survey features of each plat." Resolution No. 42 is silent regarding the subject of contracts and agreements. In addition to Resolution No. 42, 1 have attached Chapter 2.09 of the Woodinville Municipal Code and Chapter 3.16 of the Kirkland Municipal Code as examples of language used in these communities. The City of Woodinville municipal code does not address contracts and agreements, but authorizes the city manager to create, eliminate, consolidate and modify such departments, offices and employment as from time to time he or she may find necessary or advisable for the efficient operations of the City. The City of Kirkland municipal code specifically addresses the city manager's authority to sign agreements, but takes a much more detailed approach to delegation of authority for departmental organization and requires concurrence from the city council for departmental changes/organizations. The draft ordinance is intended for review and discussion purposes. The City Council should feel free to make changes to the ordinance, accept it as drafted, or reject it entirely. The primary objective of the ordinance, as previously stated, is to clarify the delegation of authority to the city manager and avoid future confusion. • Page 2 MEMO TO: MEDINA CITY MANAGER. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL RE: DELEGATION OF AU 1-1IORITY FROM: KIRK WINES DATE: May 10, 2004 AUTHORITY OF COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER In general terns. the City Council is the legislative and policy making body of the Cite while the Citv Manager is the chief administrative officer. As cities and counties are agencies of the State, the general rule is that they only have such powers as have been delegated by the State. Medina is an Optional Municipal Code City. As such, it has been granted all of the powers which have been granted to all other classes of cities within the State. See RCW 35A.I 1.020 for a list of the powers given to legislative bodies of Code cities. In the council-manager cite. RCW 35A.13.230 gives the council all the authority given to other Code cities unless such power and authority has been has been given to the city manager. The powers of the city manager are set forth in RCW 35A.1 1.080, The City Managers powers and duties include: general supervision over administrative affairs; appointment and removal of all department heads, officers and employees, except council members:. attendance at council meetings if required by the council: enforcement and execution of laws and ordinances: preparation of recommendations and reports to council: advising the council on the financial condition of the city: preparation of a proposed budget and administration of the budget as adopted by the council: and performing other duties assigned by the council. In most cities, some of the broad powers given to cite councils are delegated to the administrative branch. The City Council has the authority to enter into contracts which the Citv !Manager then manages and enforces. As a practical matter, most city councils delegate some of their authority. For example, councils frequentlydelegate authority to enter into small contracts. such as for the purchase of supplies. to the city manager who then may delegate that authority to other members of the administrative staff. In Medina. some of the authority to enter into contracts has been expressly delegated by statute such as in Chapter 2.56, governing reimbursement of travel and other expenses. hi other cases, delegation has been either informal or implied. such as delegation to the City Manager of the authority to enter into maintenance agreements for equipment. In order to avoid misunderstanding or confusion, many cities have drafted ordinances setting forth the extent of authority which the council delegates to administrative staff. RCVS 35 1 1 1.020 Powers Nested in lcoislatiNc bodies of noncharter and charter code cities. Pauc 1 0l J -'L�S C'OC.f ne,r ., Rey kedCode of %, ashineton RCW 35A.11.020 Powers vested in legislative bodies of noncharter and charter code cities. * 1_L , L �_ _ c ......mot _ I �._, ] n-i_en a1, _, _) i c. iL http:'/�Nwtitidoislaw.com%pnsitcdocvieN,.htp?dockeN=8792579ii,Wf1CODE 51l UIUd RCIA 33 4.13.230 Powers o1 council. Page I of 1 Rex ked Code of �k a,hin,'tor 1Pr6 Us Dc c , rgpnt Ir UK Pr r.urirB"' RCW 35A.13.230 Powers of council. Q� IT littp: vvvyv.loislawv.com/pns/tcdocvicvditp'?dockc}=879'639"aXVACODE Is 10101 Kl N ijA. I3.OSO Lrty mana cr Powers and duties. Re% i,ed Code of U oil Paoe 1 oI, 1 _1 J RCW 35A.13.080 City manager — Powers and duties. [PlP o,ls Du' °neln i.rr. Roo,kj http: ti IoislaN,,.com/'piis,'tc(locN,ie\�.htp'?dockeN=8792624 a WACODE 5 %] 0 04 CITY OF ^:EDINA, WAS':It.G7O1,I RESCLUTION NO. A FESOLUTION defining the duties of the city manager and determining other duties. WHEREAS, by Section 6 of Chapter 337 of the Lav's of 1955 of the State of WashirLEton, presently effective and codified at 3CW 35.18.06", the duties of the city manager in a city organized under the council-manager plan are defined in a general way, and WHEREAS Sub -section (9) thereof authorizes such a city`s council to deterrine other duroies of the city's manager, iQow, therefore, THE CITY COJNCIL OF THE .^i' CITY OF ZDTNA DOES =SOLvF AS FCLLOWS: Section 1. Purpose. It is the purpose of this resolution to conSirm, ratify, and elaborate the statutory duties of the city manager and to prescribe ether duties as authorized by HCW 35.18.160 so that the responsibilities of such office in the City of Pledina will be clarified and the efficiency and economy of their discharge be enhanced. The provisions of this resolution shall be deemed severable. Section 2, kowers and duties of tile_city manager. In addition to the rowers and du les specified in Section 6 of Chapter 337 :,aws of 1955 or any amendments thereof (HCYT 35.18.060) the city manar,er of the City of Mtedira shall have powers and duties as follows: A. In &en.era_ the city manager shall: (1) Be the chief administrative officer of the city and be responsible to the udty council for proper administration of all affairs of the 71tty of "edina; (2) Devote full time to the disc-harge of his official datles; (3) Investigate and report to the city council any complaints in relation to the affairs of the city or administration of service to the citlzens; and A _erform sucY, new duties as may -ram time to time oe required by the council consistent with State law or city ordinance, and in the execution of the _efty's ordinances. B. In respect tc meetings of the city council and other ar-encieF. of the city, the city manager shall: (1) Atter-d ell meetings of the city GOU'ITil unless excused therefrom, and take part in th,, as recut: ted by he ecurc:il ir, ma'.:'-ers cn7lnr, before the city council; (2) Recommend to the city council the adoption of such policies as he may deem necessary or expedient for the health, safety, and welfare of the community or the improvement of administrative services, including both short and long range planning; (3) Act as secretary to the planning commission -- take the minutes, advise the commission on ordinances and laws an required, and generally assist that body in its work; and, (S) Act ae secretary to the board of adjustment, take the minutes, advise the board on ard'_nances and laws as required, and generally assist the board in its work. C. In respect to the execution of the „''-ty°s ordinances, the city manager shall: (1) See that all laws and ordinances are duly enf creed ; (2) Supervise services maintained by public utilities, seeing that the conditions of all franchises, permits, and privileges granted by the city cca:acil are faithfully observed; (3) Exercise full, complete and direct supervisory responsibility for the activities of the c_tyts police, consistinj of full time employees to be classified simply as "police officer" and of part time employees to be classified simply as "auxiliary police officer", this supervisory responsibility to ineluae the setting of schedules and assignments anc, periodic reviews of police activities and the making of aperopriate reports thereon directly from the me-iager to the council; and, (4) Qualify himself to make Flat, furnace, electrical and other inspections and make such lncpectlons to insure compliance wit:_ the governing city ordinances, employing a licensed surveyor for the limitedpurpose of oheckiri�; the survey features of each plat, D. In respect to persohnei, the manager shall: (1) Apuoint and when necessary for the soai of the service susnexid ❑r remove aonointive officers aril e�iplcyees of the city except as othert•,'ise prcviaed crdicancc, direct and supervise cy are their work irclullnc; that of members of the pol.icc force; (2) Analyze and re'Dor, to thy-: city council on a regular ba,i- the act'-.vitir.s and performance of the ap o_r;teu staf`, and make ecommerdation^ on uiiail,-es and iaioroveoents and meth7ls and proce_'�=es aryl .'01, -, ignments from �._cie to tSme ..., _eriue;tcc by the city council; and, (3) Hecommer to the city council a schedule of pay for each appointive position including minimum.., ln'--ermediaLe and maximum rates after consultation with the personnel committee of the council. E. In respect to the revenues and expenditures, of the city, the city manager shall: (1) Prepare a -.entative budget annually, and summit it to the council together with a message descri'olrg the Important features and be responsible for its administration after adoption; (2) Keep the council advised of the financial condition and the future needs of the city aad makes such reeemmendations as he may deem desirable and necessary; (3) Prepare and submit to the council as of the end of the city's fiscal year, or calendar year if that be the same, a complete report on the finances and administrative activities of the city for the preceding year; and, (4) Supervise the purchase of all materials, supplies and enuinment for which funds are provided and ap-proved in the budget. T iIS P SO=U 70IV adopted this if day of December, 1961. ''ulYG3 ATTEST: HA.aY FI'ZGEaALD,CITY CLERK Title 2 ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL rage i of Chapter 2.09 CITY MANAGER Sections: 2,09.010 Office of City Manager established — Appointment. 2.09.020 Duties of City Manager. 2.09,030 City organization. 2.09.010 Office of City Manager established — Appointment. Pursuant to RCW 35A.13.010 and 35A.13.090 there is hereby established for the City of Woodinville, the office of City Manager. Such office shall be appointive and all appointments to such office shall be made by the City Council. (Ord. 23 § 1, 1993) 2.09.020 Duties of City Manager. The City Manager shall be the Chief Executive Officer and head of the administrative branch of the City. The City Manager shall be responsible to the Council for the proper administration of all affairs of the City. The City Manager shall have all of the powers and shall perform each and all of the duties specified by Chapter 35A.13 RCW, together with any other duties or authority which may be conferred upon such office by the City Council or by the laws of the State of Washington or the laws of the City as they now exist or may hereafter be amended. (Ord. 23 § 2, 1993) 2.09.030 City organization. The City Manager is authorized to create, eliminate, consolidate and modify such departments, offices and employment as from time to time he or she may find necessary or advisable for the efficient operations of the City and may determine the powers and duties of each department or office. The City Manager may delegate to such officer any duties required or authorized to be performed by the City Manager. (Ord. 23 § 3, 1993) http://seaxch.mrs... /woodin02.html?f=templates$fn=wdvldoe-frame.htm$3.0$q—$x=$ne-215 3/29/2004 l ale .3 ADM1N1,1 KA 11viv AiNI) I tLK:!5UIN IN LL ragc t ui 3.16.010 Departmental organization. The city manager is authorized to organize the following functions of the city into such administrative departments as he shall from time to time determine will best serve the interests of the citizens and residents of the city and the effective and efficient operation of the municipal corporation of the city: General administration, accounting, building, engineering, fire control and prevention, parks and recreation, personnel, planning and zoning, streets, sewer, violations bureau, water, sanitation, public services, cemetery, and library. Such departmental organization or changes thereto shall be submitted to the city council for its concurrence, which concurrence may be given by ordinance, resolution or motion duly adopted and entered in the city council minutes. (Ord. 2148 § 1, 1971) 3.16.020 Police department. In addition to the foregoing, there shall be a police department which shall have all of the duties designated and devolved upon such departments by state law generally, and specifically as to cities organized or chartered under either RCW Title 35 or 35A. (Ord. 2148 § 2, 1971) 3.16.030 Department of administrative services. There shall also be a department of administrative services. The director of the department of administrative services may, with the concurrence of the city manager, establish within the department functional divisions such as personnel and administration, and recording and records. The recording and records supervisor or manager may be designated "city clerk." (Ord. 3573 § 3, 1997: Ord. 2148 § 3, 1971) 3.16.035 Department of finance. There shall also be a department of finance. The director of the department of finance may, with the concurrence of the city manager, establish within the department functional divisions such as budget and finance (including warrant operations) and purchasing. The budget and finance supervisor or manager may be designated "city treasurer." (Ord. 3573 § 4, 1997) 3.16.037 Other departments. In addition to the foregoing, there shall be the following departments: parks and community services, planning and community development, fire and building, public works, city attorney's office, and information technology. The director of each of these departments may, with the concurrence of the city manager, establish within the department functional divisions. (Ord. 3753 § 1, 2000) 3.16.040 Provision for legal and engineering counsel. The city manager, who may seek such recommendation of the council as he deems appropriate and necessary, shall be empowered to make provision for the obtaining of legal counsel and professional engineering counsel. Such provision may be by appointment on a full- or part-time basis, or by any reasonable contractual arrangement for such professional services. (Ord. 2148 § 4, 1971) 3.16.050 Provision for professional services. The city manager in the manner set forth in Section 3.16.040 shall also be empowered to make provision by any reasonable contractual arrangement for http://search.mrsc.or... /kirk03.html?f=templates$fn=kirkdoc-frame.htm$3.0$q—$x=$nc=674 3/29/2004 I itle J AllMEN I N 1 KA t 1 V 1V A1V L1 Y�Ka V tv lv r L r aLc � U1 such other professional services as casualty and liability insurance for the city, actuarial, appraisement of properties, and similar professional services as may from time to time be required. (Ord. 2148 § 5, 1971) 3.16.060 Department heads designated by director. With the exception of those department heads, subject to the provisions of any applicable law, rule or regulation relating to civil service, the person, officer or employee designated by the city manager to be accountable or responsible to him for the departmental function and operation shall be designated the director thereof. (Ord. 2148 § 6, 1971) 3.16.065 Authority to sign agreements. (a) Interlocal Agreements. The city manager or the director of finance is authorized to execute on behalf of the city an agreement that is made pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act (see Chapter 39.34 RCW). A department director may, on behalf of the city as the delegate of the city manager, enter into an interlocal agreement so long as such agreement either imposes no financial obligation on the city or the contract is for less than twenty thousand dollars. The person who signs an interlocal agreement shall ensure that it is delivered to the city clerk's office in order that the interlocal agreement will be recorded for purposes of RCW 39.34.040. (b) Professional Services Agreements. The city manager or the director of finance is authorized to execute on behalf of the city an agreement for professional services. A department director may enter into a professional services agreement so long as such agreement does not impose a financial obligation on the city of twenty thousand dollars or more. (c) The authority delegated by this section is supplemental to the authority provided under Chapter 3.85 of this code. In case of specific conflict, the provisions of Chapter 3.85 will prevail. (Ord. 3902 § 1, 2003) http://search.mrse.or... /kirk03.html?f=templates$fn=kirkdoc-frame.htm$3.0$q=$x=$nc=674 3/29/2004 CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE RELATING TO CONTRACT APPROVALS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CERTAIN CONTRACTS WITHOUT PRIOR INDIVIDUAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL. WHEREAS, RCW 35A.11.010 provides that the City of Medina, through its legislative body, may contract and be contracted with; and WHEREAS, the City enters into a large number of minor and routine contracts for which it is burdensome to individually have City Council approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the practical needs of the City require that the City Manager enter into certain contracts without prior individual approval by the City Council in order to allow the City to function in an orderly manner; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Contract Approval Authorization. The following procedure is hereby established for the approval of certain contracts and granting the City Manager authority with respect to such contracts: A. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to enter into and execute on behalf of the City the following contracts without individual approval of each contract by the City Council, so long as the contract is consistent with the approved annual budget for the City, and the City's liability under the contract does not exceed available fund balances: 1. Contracts for purchases of goods, supplies, materials, or equipment involving a cost or fee (excluding sales tax) of less than Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000). 2. Professional service contracts, including contracts for architectural, engineering, legal, and consulting services involving a cost or fee (excluding sales tax) of less than Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000). ORD, 3. Maintenance contracts involving a cost or fee (excluding sales tax) of less than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) per year. 4. Public Works projects involving a cost or fee of less than Thirty-five Thousand Dollars ($35,000) involving multiple trades, and Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000) involving a single trade. 5. Settlement agreements involving a cost or fee of less than Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000), and retention of legal counsel and expert consultants, involving risk management claims or suits. 6. Other routine agreements where no expenditure is involved, or the cost, expenditure, or fee (excluding sales tax) does not exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000). 7. Lease agreements for materials, supplies, and equipment where the expenditure or fee does not exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) per year. 8. Sale of unneeded surplus personal property with an estimated cumulative value of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or less, which has been certified for disposition, such sale or disposition to be made by the City Manager in accordance with informal procedures and in the best interest of the City. 9. Contracts that carry out or implement a provision of the Medina Municipal Code or established City policy, e.g., maintenance or performance bonds for plat improvements. 10. Emergency contracts. "Emergency" means a set of unforeseen circumstances that either: a. Presents a real, immediate threat to the proper performance of essential functions; or b. May result in material loss or damage to property, bodily injury, or loss of life if immediate action is not taken; or c. For public works projects, may result in a substantial loss to the City if the contract is not immediately entered into. 11. Employment and personnel matters. Unless otherwise provided by statute or ordinance, e.g., salaries and compensation are subject to City ordinance. B. The breaking down of any purchase or contract into units or phases for the purpose of avoiding the maximum dollar amount is prohibited. The amount of a contract includes all amendments; provided, however, that amendments that do not exceed in total ten percent (10%) of the contract amount may be entered into without prior City Council approval. ( )P-D. C. The City Manager may present any contract to the City Council for prior approval, even if the contract is allowed to be approved without prior City Council approval. D. The City Manager is authorized to execute on behalf of the city an agreement that is made pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act (see Chapter 39.34 RCW), provided the agreement either imposes no financial obligation on the city or the contract is for less than five thousand dollars. The interlocal agreement shall be delivered to the city clerk's office in order that the interlocal agreement will be recorded for purposes of RCW 39.34.040. E. The City Manager shall promptly, within ten (10) days, provide the City Council a copy (or summary) of any contract (or amendment) that has not received prior approval by the City Council. F. "Contract" means any agreement creating a legal relationship between the City and another person or entity, or any amendment thereto. SECTION 2. Severability. Should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid for any reason, or should any portion of this Ordinance be pre- empted by state or federal law or regulation, such decision or pre-emption shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or its application to other persons or circumstances. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect five days after its publication or the publication of a summary of its intent and contents. ORD PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS DAY OF 2004 AND SIGNED IN AUTHENTICATION OF ITS PASSAGE THE _ DAY OF Approved as to form: Kirk R. Wines, City Attorney Attest: Randy Reed, CIVIC, City Clerk Passed: Filed: Published: Effective Date. P109L1 Mary Odermat, Deputy Mayor ORD. SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Medina, Washington On , 2004, the City Council of the City of Medina, Washington, passed Ordinance No. , the main points of which are summarized by its title as follows, and approved this summary. - AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE RELATING TO CONTRACT APPROVALS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CERTAIN CONTRACTS WITHOUT PRIOR INDIVIDUAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed upon request. Randy Reed, C.M.C., City Clerk ORD. ITEM D - 3 CITY OF MEDINA Development Services 501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222 www.medina-wa-qo_v MEMORANDUM DATE: June 22, 2004 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Joseph Gellings, AICP, Planning Director RE: Historic Preservation Options RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council discuss the options for a historic preservation program and provide direction to staff if such a program is desired. POLICY IMPLICATION: Currently, the scope of land use regulation in Medina is limited to restrictions on building bulk and the primary uses of land. These restrictions are grounded in the public benefit of protecting the semi -rural character sought by Medina residents as articulated in the Medina Comprehensive Plan. Enacting a historic preservation program is another type of land use regulation that some cities have employed where their historic landmarks are an asset to community identity. BACKGROUND: Recently, local home designer Karen Crenshaw brought to attention of the City Council a historic barn structure at 7722 Overlake Drive West. Ms. Crenshaw explained that an associate of hers recently purchased this property with the intention of developing three homes on it and she asked if the council would consider creating incentives to preserving the barn. It is my understanding that the barn was once used for boarding the horses that were used for a tram connecting the old Medina ferry terminal with downtown Bellevue. Typical Structure of a Historic Preservation Program There are three elements to a typical historic landmarks preservation program. Each one is described below: Landmark designation. All programs include a system for designating what landmarks in a community are worthy of inclusion in the program. The methodology could be simple or complex but usually the ulitimate decision on each candidate landmark is made by a preservation board. In some communities, there is a logical historic district, the boundaries of which can be delineated to form the first criterion in evaluating a candidate landmark. Incentive formulation. Most programs are incentive -based — i.e. the owner of a candidate landmark always has the fundamental right to demolish it but incentives are put in place for preservation. The most common type of incentive is tax relief for the property owner. Another type of incentive is known as transfer of development rights. This is used where landmarks may lie on land with a tremendous revenue potential such a historic church in a thriving downtown office district. Incentive formulation should take into ITEM D - 3 account the amount of public benefit in preserving a landmark as well as the economic value of redeveloping the land without the landmark. Owner obligations. Whenever a public agency — acting on the behalf of taxpayers — provides an incentive to the owner of a landmark, measures must be in place to ensure that the owner maintains / manages the landmark in a way that supports the public benefit envisioned by the agency. Often this includes standards for repair or renovation work to the landmark. It could also include maintaining public interpretation signs. In the case of a landmark not visible from public streets or lands, the obligations might include a periodic opening of the landmark to the public or organized tours. In the case of a landmark visible but separated from public land, the agency could require review and approval authority over the design of future buildings proposed for the "foreground" of the view from the public land. This would ensure that the landmark always has an appropriate "showcase." Medina's Situation Through personal observations and anecdotal information I believe that Medina has a number of structures that serve as valuable reminders of Medina's past role of a big city getaway / summer cottage mecca. The following are unique Medina aspects that would have to be considered before creating a historic landmark preservation ordinance. • While there is a geographic pattern to candidate landmarks (southwest corner of the city), there are no logical historic district boundaries that could be drawn. This means that the designation criteria would have to be carefully considered. • There is tremendous variance in the income of Medina property owners. While tax incentives have been universally valued in other communities with these programs, it could be naive to assume that a given tax relief program will be valued by all potential owners of landmarks in Medina. Another type of incentive, such as a lot coverage bonus, may have a more universal value in Medina. • Many candidate landmarks are not visible from public streets / parks and the property owners value their privacy. This is probably the biggest issue with enacting a historic landmarks preservation program in Medina. Beyond a few exceptions such as the Green Store, most landmarks fall in the center of residential lots in Medina. In the case of the barn structure at 7722 Overlake Drive West it is a 20' x 30' structure located approximately 200 feet from the closest public land (Overtake Drive West). A definition of "visible from public lands" would be needed in an ordinance but this would probably not meet it. It also does not appear that arrangements for public tours are compatible with the owner's plans. Page 2 ITEM D - 4 CITY OF MEDINA City Manager's Office 501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 w.medina-wa.gov MEMORANDUM DATE: June 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager 425.454.9222 RE: 2004 Retreat Agreements RECOMMENDATION: Review 2004 Annual Retreat Summary Report. Provide direction to City Manager regarding agreements and implementation. POLICY IMPLICATION: The agreements identified in the Summary Report reflect policy statements. BACKGROUND: The City Council developed twenty-one agreements during its 2004 Annual Retreat. The agreements are identified in the attached Summary Report. The Council is asked to review the Summary Report and provide staff with any modifications desired. The Summary Report will be placed on the July 12, 2004 City Council agenda for formal adoption. PENDLETON CONSULTING, L.L. THE MICHAEL R. PENDLETON Ph.D. 34225 BRIDGEVIEW DR. N.E. KINGSTON, WASHINGTON 98346 Phone (360) 638-1179 Fax (360) 638-1779 Cell (360) 271-0359 e-mail: mpendleton@telebvte.com pendletonconsultingIc@msn.com www.pendleton-consulting.com MEDINA CITY COUNCIL ANNUAL RETREAT May 81h, 2004 Summary Report Introduction The Medina City Council annual retreat was held on May Sth, 2004 at the Talaris Conference Center, Seattle, Washington. The retreat is located and structured to provide an uninterrupted forum for in-depth discussion of selected issues. The purpose of this annual retreat was to advance the understanding and positive working relationships among council members toward the goal of crafting a highly performing policy and administrative team. The following agenda guided the discussions during this first council retreat: 1. Review, discussion and establishment of working agreements 2. Council and Staff working relationship 3. City Manager Performance Evaluation Process The following report is a summary of the discussions and outcomes of the retreat: 1 Stages of Group Development The first session of the retreat focused on the characteristics of groups and the phases of group development that determine the path to effective team work (see appendix two). The session included a presentation by the consultant and a follow- up discussion including all the participants. Working Together: Toward A Highly Performing Leadership Team The first discussion module focused on a standard roster of working norms and agreements that policy teams use to promote leadership effectiveness. The following areas were discussed: Courtesy Norms: The participants first considered the City Council's commitment to courtesy in its dealing with each other, staff and the public. It was agreed that the Council is generally courteous in their interactions with each other and with the public. The Council agreed that staff does not always get treated with courtesy and each Council Member will work to improve their interaction NA-ith the staff. All agreed that courtesy is important in facilitating the city business. Public Comment Protocols. The participants discussed the importance of public participation in city government and the importance of effective protocols for facilitating public comment on city issues. It was noted that there are generally three types of public comments, those that are taken as part of the City Council's regular business meeting, those that are taken as part of a formal process such as Quasi- judicial hearings, and those taken in specific public hearings on selected issues. It was noted that each of these forums may require different protocols. After a long discussion the participants agreed to the following: Agreement One: The staff will come back to the Council with recommended protocols for public comment and subsequent Council interaction with the public for all three of the forums referenced above. 2 Agreement Two: Once the Council has adopted public comment protocols they will be published and provided to the public at the beginning of each of the public comment forums. Learning To Count To Seven. The participants next discussed the importance of including all members of the Council in discussions of key city issues. It was noted that in the past some Council members would discuss issues, informally, prior to formal meetings, creating the feeling that issues had been decided prior to business meetings. The participants agreed this was not a desirable practice. After a discussion the participants agreed to the following: Agreement Three: To use the formal business meetings of the Council as the forum for presenting and discussing city business. Every effort will be made to fully inform and include all Council Members in discussions of city issues. Honor Disagreement and Respect Our Differences. The participants next discussed the value of differing perspectives on city issues. Participants noted that this Council was very respectful of differing view's and extended that respect to staff views as well. After a discussion the participants agreed to the following: Agreement Four: To respect and invite different points of views on all issues to include both the Council and the Staff. The Meaning of a 4-3 Vote: The participants next discussed the meaning and nature of 4-3 votes. It was agreed that 4-3 votes occur and are normal part of the policy process. It was noted that chronic 4-3 votes (same four and same 3) is not desirable and can signal an era of difficult if not ineffective policy making. All participants agreed that chronic 4-3 votes are to be avoided and currently are not a feature of council policy making in the city. 3 Council Role: Policy vs. Administration. The participants next discussed the role of the Council and the importance of honoring the distinction between policy making and administration. While this distinction is often viewed as a gray area in leadership teams, it was noted that clearly the staff does and should not be making policy and the council should not be micro -managing staff (see discussion below under council -staff relationships). Role of the Mayor and Meeting Management. The participants discussed the role of the Mayor and the management of meetings. All agreed that the Mayor is doing an excellent job in performing this role. It was noted, however, that Council meetings are at times to long and less efficient than desirable. The participants discussed several factors that seem to undermine meeting efficiency. After a discussion the participants agreed to the following: Agreement Five: The staff will no longer verbally present their staff reports at each Council meeting. Agreement Six: Both staff and Boards -Commission reports will be formally placed on the Council agenda. These reports will be provided in advance in the Council packet. During the formal Council business meeting the Mayor will formally ask for the acceptance of these reports by the Council. Prior to acceptance the Council will be given an opportunity to ask questions about the reports. Council members will do their best to contact the staff in advance to advise of any questions they will be raising in the Council business meeting. Agreement Seven: To use a visible timing clock to alert public speakers to the set time limits and when their time has lapsed. Agreement Eight: To recognize that Council deliberations also can take unnecessary time and to make every effort to be succinct in expressing comments. Council Committees. The participants next reviewed and discussed their current committee structure. It was noted that the use of committees has been suspended pending this discussion because they seem to not be efficient. The 4 participants discussed the relative merits of various ways to use, or not, committees. After a discussion the participants made the following agreements: Agreement Nine: To ask staff to present a proposal that will review and recommend an approach to invigorate the Emergency Management Committee, Agreement Ten: To disband all other Council committees and operate as a Committee of the Whole. Boards and Commissions. The participants discussed the importance of effective communication between the City Council and the citv's boards and commissions. It was noted that there are times that boards and commissions set out to work on projects with little direction or indication from the City Council on the Councils interest in these projects. It was agreed that the system might function more effectively if there were better guidance from the City Council to the boards and commissions. After a discussion the participants agreed to the following: Agreement Eleven: To ask Boards and Commissions to develop a draft work plan at the beginning of each year. The plan will then be submitted to the City Council for review, adjustment and then adoption. Agreement Twelve: To ask the Boards and Commissions to provide the Council with a quarterly report on work plan progress and activities. Process For Engaging Legal Council. The participants discussed the process by which the City Council can receive legal advice and services. It was noted that while the city has on retainer, a city attorney there are times that outside advice is necessary. After a discussion the participants agreed to the following: Agreement Thirteen: To follow the following 4 step process: 1. To meet as a Council of the Whole and determine the need and nature of legal advice required. 5 2. To form questions that are to be answered by the lawyer that is to provide legal advice. 3. To determine if in house council is appropriate or if outside council is required. 4. Once the legal advice is developed it will be distributed/presented to all members of the Council together. Council -Staff Working Agreements and Protocols The final discussion module focused on a review and discussion of working agreements between the City Council and City Staff. The goal of this discussion module was to craft agreements that will facilitate an effective working relationship. Council Chamber Configuration. The participants discussed the current council chamber sitting configuration and the current practice of having some staff members sitting at the Council Dais. It was noted that staff members are currently participating freely in Council deliberations often in areas not associated with their respective areas of expertise. The participants agreed that this practice is confusing to the public and inappropriate as it effectively blurs the distinctions between the role and responsibilities of staff and the elected officials. After a discussion the participants agreed to the following: Agreement Fourteen. To reconfigure the council chamber to relocate staff sitting area off of the Council Dais. Staff Report Recommendations. The participants next discussed the current approach to receiving staff reports (see discussion above) and staff recommendations. It was noted that at times the staff seem in conflict over recommendations, often forcing the Council to choose between a staff member recommendation and a recommendation from the City Manager. All participants 0 agreed that this is not an acceptable situation. After a long discussion the participants agreed to the following: Agreement Fifteen: The Council wants one staff recommendation on an issue. If the staff is in disagreement over the recommendation the City Manager will make the final determination. Agreement Sixteen: Whenever possible and reasonable the Council would like to be presented with two or more policy or decision options. These options could include the option that is recommended by staff. Agreement Seventeen: Any attempt by a staff member to lobby a Council Member on an option that is NOT the formal recommendation of the staff will be rebuffed by Council members. The Staff person will be asked to present his/her concerns to the City Manager and the City Manager will be notified of the staff contact with the Council member by the Council member involved. Council Access To Staff. The participants discussed the value and potential problems with Council members contacting staff directly on issues. It was noted that such contact need to balance the common sense of simply getting information with the more problematic practice of micro -management. After a long discussion the participants agreed to the following: Agreement Eighteen: Council members can contact Department Directors directly for information. If the request takes more than one hour to accommodate the request must first be presented to the full council for approval. Agreement Nineteen: Staff will be directed to advise the City Manager of any Council contacts to facilitate knowledge sharing. Agreement Twenty: Any research performed for a Council Member that results in a written report will be given to all Council Members at the same time. 7 City Manager Performance Evaluation Process. The participants next discussed the City Manager performance evaluation process. It was noted that the current process is not complete. After a long discussion the participants agreed to the following: Agreement Twenty One: To complete the following four step process: 1. Present the City Manager with the Summary of The Current Evaluation for his review 2. To provide the City Manager an opportunity to prepare a written response to be appended to the evaluation 3. To meet with the City Manager to discuss the evaluation, his response and to set performance goals for 2005. 4. Prepare a formal written evaluation packet that includes the summary, the City Managers response, and the performance goals for 2005 to include means of measuring accomplishment of these goals. 8 Appendix One Retreat Participants Mavor Mary Odermat Council Member Miles Adam Council Member Drew Blazey Council Member Katie Phelps Council Member Bob Rudolph Council Member Pete Vall-Spinosa Council Member Todd Nunn City Manager Doug Schulze Facilitator Michael Pendleton 9 Appendix Two The Five Stages of Group Development Stage Major Processes Characteristics Forming Development of attraction Tentative interactions; bonds; Exchange of information; polite discourse; concern orientation towards others and over ambiguity, silences situation. Storming Dissatisfaction with others; Ideas are criticized; competition among members; speakers are interrupted; disagreement over procedures; attendance is poor; hostility conflict Norming Development of group Agreement on rules; structure; increased consensus seeking; cohesiveness and harmony, increased supportiveness; establishment of roles and we -feeling relationships Performing Focus on achievement; high Decision -making; task orientation; emphasis on problem solving; performance and productivity cooperation; decreased emotionality Adjourning Termination of duties; Regret; increased reduction of dependency; emotionality, task completion disintegration 10