HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-12-2004 - Agenda PacketMEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
July 12, 2004
501 Evergreen Point Road
A. CALL TO ORDER
7:00 p.m.
Medina, WA
7:00 p.m.
B. ROLL CALL (Adam, Blazey, Nunn, Odermat, Phelps, Rudolph, Vall Spinosa)
C. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
D. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS
E. ANNOUNCEMENTS
1. Mayor
2. Council
3. Staff
F. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Minutes from June 14, 2004 Council Meeting
2. Minutes from June 28, 2004 Council Study Session
3. Approval of June 2004 Checks/Finance Officer's Report
4. Cable TV Franchise Consultant Agreement
5. Minutes from June 07, 2004 Special Meeting
G. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
1. Non -Agenda Items (3 minutes per person)
H. REPORTS
1. Police Department
2. Development Services
3. Public Works Department
4. Park Board
5. Emergency Preparedness Committee
6. City Manager's Report
I. PUBLIC HEARING
1. Draft Ordinance Establishing Dog Control Regulations in Medina Park
J. OTHER BUSINESS
1. Council Agenda Calendar
K. NEW BUSINESS
L. EXECUTIVE SESSION
1. Personnel Matters
M. ADJOURNMENT
TO BE HELD AT 6:00 p.m.
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES
June 7, 2004 Medina City Hall
7:00 PM 501 Evergreen Point Road
ROLL CALL
Present: Council members Miles Adam, Drew Blazey, Katie Phelps, Bob Rudolph, Pete Valk
Spinosa, and Mayor Mary Odermat.
Absent/Excused Deputy Mayor Todd Nunn
Staff Present: City Manager Doug Schulze, City Attorney Kirk Wines, Planning Director Joseph Gellings
and Recording Secretary Caroll Wedlund.
CALL TO ORDER --The meeting of the Medina City Council was called to order at 7:04 p.m.
ANNOUNCEMENTS --Mayor Odermat announced the purpose of tonigl-t's quasi-judicial hearing was to consider a
Special Use Permit for Medina Elementary School. She requested that members of the audience who wished to
speak to complete speaker cards, which were subject to public disclosure laws in the State of Washington. Mayor
Odermat opened the public hearing at 7:06 p.m.
Planning Director Gellings noted the applicant was requesting a Special Use Permit to renew the educational use of
this property through replacement of the Medina Elementary School building. He noted the Council had received
copies of the latest letters from residents. Planning Director Gellings furnished background information regarding
the project. He also noted Bellevue School District personnel and their consultants had done an excellent job on
this project, including holding four community school meetings. Planning Director Gellings relayed groundbreaking
would not occur for another year, and clarified if any of the design resolution went in a direction inconsistent with
the proposal before the Council, it would be returned to them for review.
John Amanat, Capital Construction Manager for Bellevue School District, 12037 NE 5th Street, Bellevue,
98005, relayed a bond issue had been passed authorizing Bellevue School District to modernize its schools.
Children attending Medina Elementary would be transferred to Bellewood Elementary School during the demolition
and reconstruction process.
Imad Bahbah, architect for McGranahan Architects, 2111 Pacific, Suite 100, Tacoma, 98402, furnished
background information and outlined the steps he and members of his architectural firm had taken, including
garnering input through community meetings. The site plan represented the culmination of goals and ideas. One of
the main concerns had been safety and separation of traffic and ci-culation. The primary vehicular circulation
strategy was to separate parent drop-off and pick up frorn that for school bus loading operations. That had been
accomplished through dedication of one loop for parental drop-off and another one for buses, so that neither traffic
stream would overlap or interfere with the intersection of NE 8`1' Street and 80`1' Avenue NE. The purpose of the
separate traffic patterns was to keep the intersection clear for students. They had left the playfield the way it was
currently configured. Further, they had recognized the park -like setting of the site and had enhanced it with several
specialized gardens. He noted the earth garden would double as an amphitheater. Building massing had been
optimally modulated to create visual interest and to fit into the neighbDrhood. When asked by a Council member
about light monitors, Mr. Bahbah responded a representative from Seattle Lighting would conduct a light study to
see how well light monitors would work in the classrooms. Planning Director Gellings indicated he had not included
pure aesthetic matters for the soccer field into the Special Use Per it, but had incorporated visual and noise
screening as well as sight lines for safety. Another Council member Inquired about the necessity of converting the
walkway along Overlake Drive West to concrete, noting it was currently gravel. Mr. Bahbah responded the School
District would not be opposed to leaving the sidewalk in its present gravel state. A Council member noted that
money could be better spent for grass on site. Another Council member expressed concern about the lack of
bathrooms In the south classroom pods, and was informed that issue had been addressed in the revised plan. It
was also suggested there be more drinking fountains in the proposed school.
Mayor Odermat opened the public hearing to audience participation at 7:42 p.m.
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Margaret Maxwell, 8040 NE 8`h Street, stated she lived across from the school entrance, and had been impacted
by the traffic. She emphasized it was important to have a sidewalk continue on the south side of NE 8"' Street.
City Council Special Public Hearing Minutes
June 7., 2004
Page 2
Otherwise, people would be walking in the street. She also noted the lack of climbing structures in the play area.
Further, backstops on the street side should be taller. Ms. Maxwell also felt she would receive the full brunt of the
proposed structure. Ms. Maxwell also requested that the Special Use Pe-mit indicate it was for elementary school
use only. She also suggested the children have access to an outdoor bathroom.
Patrick Holcomb, 7488 Overlake Drive West, asked about construction duration, and Mr. Bahbah responded the
proposed school should be completed by August of 2005. Mr. Holcomb also inquired about hours of operation and
whether or not construction traffic would be off site, and was informed the construction hours would be 7:00 a.m. to
7:00 p.m., and construction parking would either be on site or the workers would be bussed from another location.
Mr. Holcomb also asked about crossing guards, to which Mr. Bahbah responded they would be posted at the
crosswalk in front of the main entrance to the school. Mayor Odermat stated the city had a traffic control plan on
file, and Mr. Holcomb was welcome to review it. Mr. Holcomb's last question related to lighting during or after
construction time, and Mr. Gellings indicated there would be no increase in overall lighting intensity on the site.
Ron Santi, 7842 NE 81h Street, submitted a color picture to the Council for review. He took exception to a
statement no territorial views would be altered. Mr. Santi also seconded Ms. Maxwell's request that the facility
remain an elementary school. He read a prepared statement into the record. Mr. Santi felt the School District was
asking for a special privilege.
Heii Nunn, 7668 NE 14th Street, thanked the School District staff for responding to citizens' needs regarding sight
lines for the playfield, and for designing more appealing and safe paring access. She suggested the substation
might be used for bathroom facilities. Ms. Nunn also indicated the demographics of Medina could change, so the
facility should not be solely designated for elementary school use.
Allyson Jackson, 7633 NE 14th Street, thought the money designated for a concrete sidewalk along Overlake
Drive West could be used for a higher need area. She also cautioned the city should ensure safe access for
children walking to school along the south side of NE 81h Street. Mr. Bahbah noted Director of Public Works Jahn
had requested no sidewalk on the south side of NE 8th Street, in order to deter jaywalking, and to discourage
children from moving back and forth on both sides of the street during peak hours. Mr. Gellings observed to the
west of the school there was no sidewalk on either side of NE 8`h Street. If the Medina Grocery opened, there was a
possibility of a sidewalk being added to that segment on the north side. However, the entire channelization plan had
been to keep children away from the bus and parent drop off routes. City Manager Schulze added the Council
would be requested to take action on the six -year Capital Improvement Plan on Monday, June 14, 2004, which
would also include continuing the sidewalk on the north side of NE 8th Street.
Terry Gibson, Gibson Traffic Consultants, 4610 — 131st St. Ct. NW, Gig Harbor, 98232, relayed he was trying to
move children to the north side of NE 81h Street, and was attempting to get as many parents as possible to park and
to drop off on site. The plan was to get the students to cross at the central crosswalk.
In response to an inquiry regarding whether or not the playground area had decreased, Mr. Bahbah responded no
playground area had been lost, and in fact the two play areas were as large if not bigger than what was presently
on the site. He indicated some of the illegal play structures would be-emoved and replaced with new equipment.
Andrew Cottrill, of McGranahan Architects, added the site woulc have a flagpole. Mr. Amanat relayed the
student population in the next ten years was not expected to increase, and the Bellevue School District had no
plans to change school boundaries.
Mayor Odermat inquired of City Attorney Wines whether a condition could be imposed that the facility remain an
elementary school, and whether the city could mandate an upper limit on the number of schools within its
boundaries. City Attorney Wines thought the city would have difficulty trying to limit what the School District could
do with its property or attempting to enforce the number of schools in Medina. Further, the city concern was with
the zoning controls on the property.
Kristen Edelnertz, 8215 NE 8th Street, relayed she had attended the community meetings and was in support of
the proposed plan. She wanted the gravel walkway on Overtake Drive West to remain. Ms. Edelnertz also
expressed concern about a way to get across 84°i Avenue NE, and suggested limiting the east entrance. Council
member Vail-Spinosa agreed, adding there should be a sidewalk on both sides of the road at that location.
City Council Special Public Hearing Minutes
June 7,.2004
Page 3
Ron Whited, 1959 Evergreen Point Road, asked if tonighfs meeting would include the Council's vote on the
Medina School Special Use Permit. Mayor Odermat indicated the school district had some time constraints, and the
Council would vote on the issue at this meeting. As a parent of an infant, Mr. Whited was of the opinion the
demolition and rebuilding of Medina Elementary would impact surrounding residences, and that should be taken
into consideration. He was also amazed by the amount of red tape involved in the building process. Mr. Whited also
inquired about building code enforcement in Medina. He had been through the inspection process many times and
believed it to be insufficient. He inquired whether Medina planned to have more inspectors. Medina Elementary was
a large project which would shortly be approved. Did the city have the enforcement ability? He thought other cities
did a betterjob than Medina.
Mayor Odermat indicated the city did a very adequate job of enforcing its code, given the resources it had with staff.
She suggested Mr. Whited submit any valid complaints in writing to the city. Mr. Whited reiterated his concern
about enforcement of the building code. A Council member stated the Council had gone through the building permit
process during the May Study Session. During that Study Session, the Building Official had admitted Medina had
three times as many inspections as King County required. Therefore, the Council would be hard pressed to say
Medina needed more inspections than it already had. Mr. Whited was in agreement with the number of inspections.
It was the quality he was concerned with, as he did not think there was adequate staff in the field.
City Manager Schulze stated an applicant had an opportunity to revise plans throughout the process. Some of the
very large projects had hundreds of revisions. That was why one might not necessarily see what was permitted as
the same thing at the end of the project. Code enforcement was something Medina had always approached with a
response to complaints. It had improved over the last couple of years, because the Inspector checked properties
other than those for which she had an appointment. Mr. Whited stated the city no longer had Lowell Erickson as its
Building Official, and he was concerned about that.
Mark Nelson, 1233 Evergreen Point Road, indicated he was speaking as a citizen and as a parent of three
children who had attended Medina Elementary School. His children sill used the facilities. He had reviewed the
school plans as an architect and as a Planning Commission member. Mr. Nelson asked if the plan before the
Council was the one they were approving, as it was different than the one in his Council packet.
Mr. Gellings stated the city's policy with all land use applications was drawings were developed to a point to allow
staff to make a decision. There would be lots of design refinement before ground was broken. The test would be if
any of the refinements changed the character that was portrayed to tire Council tonight. He indicated the Council
should respond to and act upon the original application and let staff decide whether refinements were beyond
approval scope. He relayed if siting were changed the application would be returned to the Council because it
would then be a different character.
Mr. Nelson wanted to know which plans were being reviewed tonight. He also indicated the site plans in the Council
packets were well done. Mr. Nelson supported comments about the walkway to the north. He was concerned about
height modulation. There were still 35 foot tall walls that faced residential properties.
Mayor Odermat closed the audience participation portion of the public hearing at 8:34 p.m.
A Council member requested a new packet with all the changes depicted on the white board be furnished to the
Council, so they would have for the record what was approved. Anather Council member noted if there were
substantial changes, they would come back to the Council at a later date. City Attorney Wines was asked if the
outdoor bathroom and the drinking fountains were part of the scope of what the Council was approving. City
Attorney Wines stated there were detailed plumbing, fire and electrical codes that must be met. He did not know
whether those codes addressed drinking fountains or outdoor bathrooms, they were outside the scope of the
Council's purview.
City Attorney Wines requested that Mr. Bahbah mark each exhibit. Mr. Bahbah marked each one numerically.
Andrew Cottrill, McGranahan Architects, indicated there had been no additional square footage added, and the
changes were simply cost reduction matters. A few of the deep modulations had been removed. The majority of the
elements in the school remained the same. Further, the setbacks had increased on all sides. The classroom pods
had been moved together to reduce glazing area setbacks. He also indicated the perimeter lineal footage of the
building had been reduced. However, the character of the building remained unchanged.
City Council Special Public Hearing Minutes
June T. 2004
Page 4
Mr. Bahbah added a construction document level estimate would be done prior to going to bid. If there were
adjustments to be made, they generally happened before going to bid. He stated the estimated budget was S13.5
million. However, with the proposed modifications, that amount had been reduced by S2 million. Their goal was
quality education and safety to the students, which would not be compromised in any way.
Mayor Odermat asked Planning Director Gellings how he would determine what would come back to the Council for
review. Planning Director Gellings responded staff tended to be very conservative in reviewing changes and
determining whether any of them were within the scope of the original ;approval. Any changes that came closer to
the property line or increased the perceived bulk would come before the council.
Compatibility — Planning Director Gellings stated he would be able tc determine whether the refinements were
within the scope of review. He noted changing from steel to wood had been with reference to the internal structure,
and would not be seen. A Council member wanted to ensure any further changes would not make the school look
like a box.
Setbacks — No concerns.
Landscaping — Mayor Odermat asked City Attorney Wines if the Counci could impose a grassy field as a condition,
and he responded affirmatively. Colin MacRae, of the Bellevue School District, responded the City of Bellevue
and the City of Clyde Hill had entered into a cooperative agreement regarding field enhancements. The Council
wished to impose a grassy field as a condition attached to the permit.
Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation Plan — Mayor Odermat thought the Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation Plan
had been well designed. A Council member requested that the last sentence under that section be removed,
'Another key aspect of the pedestrian plan is the switching of Overlake Drive and 81s' Avenue NE sidewalks from
gravel to concrete." By consensus, the Council decided to remove the last sentence under Pedestrian and
Vehicular Circulation Plan.
Lighting — No questions.
Safety — Mayor Odermat mentioned her safety concerns had been eliminated with the condensing of the building.
Parking — A Council member questioned whether there should be s handicapped parking spot at the school
entrance in addition to the two already depicted. Mr. Bahbah stated the benefit to placing the handicapped parking
spots in the bus loading area was there was not much auto traffic there. He conceded three handicapped spots
might be needed, but he would evaluate the safest location when it vas determined how many more would be
considered necessary.
Height —The Council unanimously supported a maximum building heighl of 35 feet.
Massinq — A Council member thought the architects had made a noble attempt to break up the massing with
modulation. The smallest dimension was facing toward the residences.
Land Use Designation — It was noted the school property was designated for that usage in the Medina Municipal
Code.
Minimum Lot Area — No questions.
Maximum Lot Coverage — No questions.
The Council discussed the recommendations outlined in the staff repert. Planning Director Gellings suggested the
final lighting design be subject to staff approval. He also indicated bare minimum lighting was needed at night. The
Council decided there should be a new section 2.c in the recommendations which would address the requirement
for a grassy soccer field 200 by 300 feet, rather than dirt. A Council member added the new plan removed a lot of
green area for the second parking lot. Therefore, it made sense to ensure the field was grassy A Council member
asked about maintenance of that field, and another Council member suggested an option could be quality artificial
turf. Another Council member commented it was incumbent upon the District to maintain the landscaping for the
school. Colin MacRae, of the Bellevue School District, stated to maintain the area would take away from general
funds which paid teachers. Mayor Odermat inquired whether the Public; Works crew could mow the playfleld during
City Council Special Public Hearing Minutes
June T.2004
Page 5
the summer. City Manager Schulze indicated maintaining the playfield during the summer could be done by the
Public Works Crew, since they were already mowing in the area anyway. He also noted the City of Bellevue had
scheduling rights for use of the playfield facilities. He would have to talk to the School District personnel. The
Council wanted to ensure the design of the school and site improvements adhered to the mitigation measures listed
in the May 2004 report by Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc.
The fourth staff recommendation discussed the walkway along the north side of the primary loop road only
extending to the last parking space and not to NE 81h Street. Planning Director Gellings stated if there were a stub
of a walkway there, sooner or later someone would use it. Therefore, lie suggested only bringing the sidewalk to
where it would serve the loop.
Council member Blazey moved, seconded by Council member Adam, to approve the Medina Elementary School
Special Use Permit, with the two requested conditions. Planning Director Gellings summarized the requested
changes as changing the playfield surface to grass and keeping the sidewalk on Overtake Drive West in its current
gravel state. City Attorney Wines suggested adding to that authorizing the Mayor to sign a written decision of
approval, including findings of fact, conditions of approval and conclusions. Mayor Odermat voiced appreciation to
the Bellevue School District and to Planning Director Gellings for their efforts with the proposed Medina Elementary
School.
Mayor Odermat closed the public hearing at 9:26 p.m
ADJOURNMENT
Council member Adam moved, seconded by Council member Blazey, to adjourn the special public hearing at 9:26
p.m., and the motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Mary Odermat
Attest:
Carol] P. Wedlund, Recording Secretary
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING MINUTE'S
June 14, 2004 Medina City Hall
7:00 PM 501 Evergreen Point Road
ROLL CALL
Present: Council members Miles Adam, Drew Blazey, Katie Phelps, Pete Vail-Spinosa and Mayor
Mary Odermat.
Absent/Excused: Council member Bob Rudolph and Deputy Mayor Todd Nunn
Staff Present: City Manager (CM) Doug Schulze, City Attorney Kirk Wines, Police Chief Jeff Chen,
Director of Public Works Shel Jahn, Director of Community Development Joseph Gellings
and Recording Secretary Caroll Wedlund.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting of the Medina City Council was called to order at 7:06 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Mayor Odermat polled the Council regarding deferring discussion of agenda items J-1, 2005 Budget Goals and
Process, and J-7, Authorize City Manager to fill Administrative Assistant position, until the full Council was present.
Council consensus was to go through the full agenda during tonight's meeting.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Odermat relayed the following:
• An SR-520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project Open House will be held on June 15, 2004 from 5 00 to 7:00
p.m. at the Museum of History and Industry and on June 17, 2004 at St. Luke's Lutheran Church on Bellevue
Way.
• The Emergency Preparedness Committee will meet June 16, 2004 et City Hall.
• The deadline is July 2, 2004 for producing signatures in support of Initiative 864 for state-wide reduction of
property taxes on the November ballot.
Council members were requested to inform the City Clerk or the City Manager regarding any planned absences this
summer.
As a point of clarification, Recording Secretary Wedlund relayed Council member Blazey had inquired following the
May 10, 2004 meeting whether or not the City Manager edited the Council minutes. She reported the City Manager
had never done so. Ms. Wedlund also announced her last day as Recording Secretary for the Council would be
June 30, 2004.
CONSENT AGENDA
Council member Adam moved, seconded by Council member Phelps, to approve the consent agenda. Council
member Adam amended his original motion to approve the consent agenda with his addition to the April 26, 2004
Study Session minutes, which met with Council consensus. The consent agenda as amended was unanimously
approved.
E-1 Minutes of May 10, 2004 Council Meeting - approved
E-2 Minutes of May 24, 2004 Council Study Session - approved with header modification
E-3 May 2004 Checks and Finance Officer's Report - approved
E-4 April 12, 2004 Council Meeting - approved
E-5 April 26, 2004 Council Study Session - approved with addition from Council member Adam
E-6 Ordinance amending MIMIC 15.04 to adopt International Building Code - approved
E-7 Reappointment of Jim Lawrence to Planning Commission -- apprcved
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Mayor Odermat opened the meeting to audience participation at 7:20 p.m.
Bruce Raskin, 1032 - 84"' Avenue NE, accompanied by his wife and two daughters, reported he had checked
with neighbors prior to building a tree house on his property. He asked the Council to amend the Zoning Code to
allow tree houses within the required setback. He continued moving the tree house would mean its being in a much
more obtrusive location.
As an architect for a Seattle firm. Bob Koch, 3200 - 100`h Avenue NE, Bellevue, requested time on the June
Study Session agenda to make a presentation regarding building heights and land use zoning on long, narrow R-16
zoned lots. He wished to show the Council examples and ideas regarding different perspectives other than railroad
City Council Meeting Minutes
June 14, 2004
Page 2
train homes on such lots. Mayor Odermat relayed the Council would take his request under New Business later this
evening, and would inform him whether or not they would elect to include his request in the June Study Session
agenda.
REPORTS
Police Department --A Council member voiced appreciation for the greater detail in the Police Department monthly
report.
Development Services —Regarding the Medina Elementary School Special Use Permit, a Council member
wanted assurances the Council would receive within a week or so the revised site plan which the Bellevue School
District representatives had presented during the June 7, 2004 special Council meeting. Director of Community
Development Gellings stated the elevations had not been updated, but he was certain the architects would be
happy to furnish an updated site plan, including elevations, along with an auto cad presentation. Concern about the
elevation of the proposed Medina Elementary School was expressed, as well as an asphalt versus aluminum roof
for that facility. Mayor Odermat indicated these issues could be discussed under New Business tonight.
A Council member requested clarification regarding the issue of utility under grounding at 2233 Evergreen Point
Road. Director of Community Development Gellings offered to present alternatives to the Council, adding there was
not an automatic solution regarding branch overhead service lines down private lanes. The Code only referred to
property fronting Medina streets. Staff had developed an interpretation that a branch line need not be altered until
the entire line could be under grounded, so residents who were happy with the service to their homes on private
lanes would not be prematurely forced to underground before the last residence on that lane was developed. The
Council requested follow up with options to clarify the Code regarding utility under grounding.
A Council member referred to the Alert Section on page three of the monthly Development Services report, and
inquired whether the Council needed to take any action. Director of Community Development Gellings replied there
was a theoretical problem in that a resident could reconstruct 59 percent of his or her residence one year and do
the same thing the following year. The other issue was with ancillary projects that were completed as a condition of
closing on primary structures. Staff planned to monitor the situation a bi: longer, and was still working through some
different cases with multi -faceted projects. He promised to update the Council at a future meeting.
A Council member inquired about International Building Code follow up progress with local architects and builders
who worked in Medina. Director of Community Development Gellings indicated an open-ended discussion with the
architects had resulted in helpful comments about Medina's process, and how to streamline it. There had not yet
been a meeting with owners and contractors, but one could be arranged.
Another Council member asked about pass -through charges in conjunction with permitting. Director of Community
Development Gellings replied often it was the norm for the scope of the project to escalate during the construction
process. There were currently two cases in dispute, where the owners were questioning the city's policy of raising
the fee for the final valuation. City Attorney Wines added the cases were not yet to the lawsuit stage. Both cases
involved recomputing the permit fee based on actual costs Medina fees were currently being charged from the
Building Code as the cost or value of the structure increased. The owners were questioning a full permit fee and full
reconciliation permit fee for each permit granted. Permits were only good for 18 months, with a six month
extension. When the permit expired, if the work was not yet completed. the homeowner paid a new permit fee. The
city had sought the opinion of outside counsel, who had advised the city was justified in what it was doing. Both the
Community Development and Building Departments were still losing money on what they were collecting. Mayor
Odermat inquired whether the homeowner clearly understood at the beginning of the project that there would be
reconciled fees upon its conclusion. Director of Community Development Gellings felt it was clear because the
homeowner went through the exercise based on value of the work before the permit was even issued. Mayor
Odermat suggested the process be very clear and simple to understand. A Council member suggested each
homeowner requesting a building permit be initially reminded of the expiration date and the fee reconciliation
process. Director of Community Development Gellings clarified that the last sentence, first paragraph on page three
of his monthly report regarding not receiving the full permit fees had to do with past practice.
Public Works— A Council member relayed tennis players were excited about completion of the tennis courts.
Public Works Director Jahn replied the completed tennis courts would to a great addition. The asphalt surface must
cure before installing the playing surface, and that was the reason for the delay.
City Council Meeting Minutes
June 14, 2004
Page 3
Mayor Odermat inquired when the three way stop sign would be installed at the intersection of Evergreen Pt. Road
and Overlake Drive West. Public Works Director Jahn stated his intention to install pre -notice stop signs the latter
part of July, and to announce the new three-way stop sign in the next Medina quarterly newsletter.
Mayor Odermat noted the $11,000 per year spent on mutt mitts in Medina. Public Works Director Jahn indicated
many of these 11 cents each mitts were disappearing and being taken home by Medina Park users.
A Council member inquired about landscape maintenance on NE 24th Street. Public Works Director Jahn stated
part of the plantings had not been coordinated with Public Works at the; time that landscaping was installed. Also,
no irrigation system had been installed. However, there was money ii the 2004 budget to irrigate that NE 24th
Street strip. It was currently unsafe to water during the summer. Also plants that were too high created a sight
visibility problem. Therefore, some plants would have to be removed and replaced with smaller ones.
Public Works Director Jahn was asked about trimming and cleaning around the Windsong carving. He replied the
intent had been to oil and refinish the wood carving, and the Public Works crew could weed that area then.
City Manager's Report —A Council member inquired about the Financial Report. City Manager Schulze stated in
the future the Financial Report could be addressed under agenda iterri F-3, Approval of Monthly Checks/Finance
Officer's Report. However, it would be helpful to have financial questions in advance of the Council meeting.
A Council member asked about progress on updating the city's website. City Manager Schulze indicated those
duties were now performed in-house, and updates were now done more quickly than in the past.
A Council member wondered if the Planning Commission had been notified of the mandated requirement for a
quarterly report. Mayor Odermat was not aware the Council was requiring the Planning Commission to do so.
Another Council member thought since the Council was now receiving the agenda and minutes, a quarterly report
was duplicative for both the Park Board and the Planning Commission. Public Works Director Jahn clarified the new
Park Board ordinance required both an annual work plan and quarterly reports.
City Manager Schulze stated he had just received the final Council Annual Retreat report the week prior, and it
would be on the next Council agenda.
PUBLIC HEARING
2005 — 2010 Capital Improvement Plan —Mayor Odermat opened the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. Public Works
Director Jahn noted the 2005 — 2010 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) had been presented to the Council at the
April 26, 2004 Study Session. No amendments to the Capital Improv=ment Plan were directed at that time. He
reviewed the options available to the Council. A Council member inquired if the $270,000 amount requested for
project pumps in 2005 was additional money beyond what the Council had already approved, or whether it was
funds the Council had thought they would expend in 2004 but were now spending in 2005. Public Works Director
Jahn replied he had shifted some of the money he had thought would be spent in 2004 to next year. He planned to
make a Council presentation in a couple of months that would update the project and could change the figures. It
would contain a better model program for the fish habitat in concert with the beach environment. A Council member
wanted to endorse it subject to funding, once the Council approved the budget process. Public Works Director Jahn
noted the 2005 — 1010 CIP was the authorization document rather than one of appropriations. If the CIP were
approved as proposed this evening, Public Works Director Jahn indicated he would start the planning process. If
the resources were not available at the end of this year to fund certair CIP projects, they would not be executed.
However, there would at least be a plan on the shelf.
A Council member inquired about the sidewalk projects in 2006 and 2007. Another Council member responded the
sidewalk from Medina Elementary on NE 8th Street to Evergreen Point Road would occur in 2006. Public Works
Director Jahn noted the sidewalk proposed for 2007 at the north end cf Evergreen Point Road would be the most
contentious one. He planned to show schematics to the residents along that part of Evergreen Point Road. That
proposed sidewalk would impact some residents who had plantings it the right-of-way. The intent was to hold a
public hearing to allow residents an opportunity to voice their opinions. There was also an opportunity for Bellevue
Sewer and Water as well as Puget Sound Energy to install subsurface lines simultaneous with the proposed
sidewalk. A Council member emphasized passage of the CIP did not mean the Council had approved the
sidewalks. Mayor Odermat opened the public hearing to audience participation at 8:14 p.m.
Mark Nelson, 1233 Evergreen Point Road, did not know what was in the CIP and inquired how could the public
respond if they did not know what was being planned? He indicated ro details had been included in the Council
City Council Meeting Minutes
June 14, 2004
Page 4
packet. Director of Public Works Jahn stated the complete CIP had been available for review in the City Clerk's
office for a couple of weeks. Mr. Nelson stated it would be difficult for the public to comment if they did not come to
the City Clerk's office to review it prior to tonight's meeting. City Manager Schulze commented both the Planning
Commission Chair and Vice Chair had been provided copies of the Council packet. Mayor Odermat closed the
audience participation portion at &16 p.m.
Following discussion, Council member Phelps moved, seconded by Council member Vall-Spinosa, to accept the
six -year CIP as presented, and the Council unanimously adopted it. Council member Blazey moved to pass
Resolution No. 306, Adopting a Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program and Directing the Same to be Filed
with the State Secretary of Transportation and the Transportation Improvement Board. Council member Vall-
Spinosa seconded, and the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Odermat closed the public hearing at &19 p.m.
OTHER BUSINESS
Safety Measures on Overlake Drive East —A Council member expressed concern about safety on Overlake Drive
East, as it had been a topic of concern in his neighborhood. City Manager Schulze stated continuation of the
walkway along Overlake, starting at Evergreen Point Road, used to be n the CIP three to four years ago. The first
phase included a pedestrian pathway to 81s' Avenue NE, the second pease to 841h Avenue NE, and all the way to
Lake Washington Boulevard. This phased pedestrian pathway development had fallen off when the Council
decided to eliminate the CIP for a year or two. Director of Public Works Jahn stated there were spots where a path
could be installed, and it was possible to have an elevated walkway along the bridge. However, there were
numerous locations where the area was so narrow it would be very hard to install a walkway. There was also a
tremendous slope stability issue along various right-of-way sections. Mayor Odermat inquired if the city would be
creating liability to install a pathway that might not be safe. Director of Public Works Jahn responded he had
discussed this issue with a number of citizens and the Council should address it. However, installation of even a
narrow pathway would be expensive. Mayor Odermat suggested Director of Public Works Jahn and the Council
member who had expressed the safety concern should discuss it together. Director of Public Works Jahn
suggested radar signs be permanently mounted on Overlake Drive East because speedometers had been clocked
as high as 72 miles per hour on that road. Chief Chen stated radar sigrs cost 57,000 to $10,000 each, but they did
catch the eyes of motorists.
2005 Budget Goals and Process —City Manager Schulze stated the 2004 budget was developed based upon
policies established by the Council in seven major categories relating .o financial stability. He requested guidance
whether the Council wished to use the same policies or modify them for the 2005 budget. The current policy
maintained zero percent utility tax, which the Council had previously indicated they would like to discuss again. A
utility tax of three to four percent would generate a substantial amount of revenue with impact of approximately
$10.00 to 520.00 per month for a typical household. Actual monthly cost to a household would be based on total
utility consumption.
City Manager Schulze inquired of the Council how they wished to address the potential reduction of the property tax
levy if voters approved Initiative 864. He noted the impact of this initiative would be a loss of more than S500,000 in
2005, which would create a significant impact upon the city ability to provide services. The initiative must be
certified by July 2, 2004 if it were to be placed on the November ballot. Seventeen cities were considering a levy
ratification or lid lift election in September, to ratify the levy at its current rate, which would supersede 1-864.
Medina's levy was approximately $1.00 per thousand dollars of assessed valuation. He suggested the Council
review this matter and make a decision during the July 12, 2004 Council meeting, which would be after the deadline
for certification of an initiative to be placed on the November ballot. City Manager Schulze continued the State
Department of Revenue, the King County Assessor and a local law firm had opined that those jurisdictions with a
previous levy lid lift were exempt, which made the city technically exempt from 1-864, if the ballot measure were
approved by Medina voters. The Council by consensus decided to wait and see if 1-864 was certified by July 2,
2004, and if it was, the required ordinance should be on the July 12, 2004 agenda.
City Manager Schulze inquired whether the Council wished to approach 2005 budget decisions from a line item
perspective or via expenditure category. By consensus, the Council wanted to utilize expenditure category review
rather than take the line itern approach.
City Manager Schulze noted there were only two or three cities in King County that had zero percent utility tax. A
Council member stated Medina residents already paid a substantial amount of property taxes, and it would be
difficult to ask them to pay a utility tax. Further, Clyde Hill's property taxes were half those of Medina.
City COLInal Meeting Minutes
June 14,2004
Page 5
By unanimous consensus, the Council wished to continue using the adopted budget policies for 2005.
Director of Public Works Jahn reminded the Council the city would receive eighteen SR-520 disciplinary reports
beginning in July, and Medina would have two weeks to respond to each one. Medina had agreed to be a
cooperating agency, which meant they would provide Input and feedback. His intention was to submit a memo for
Council review. City Manager Schulze stated money was already in the budget for SR-520 issues. Mayor Odermat
added the Council should decide whether they wished to tackle this issae as a full Council, as a subcommittee, or
whether they should hire a consultant to advise them. She suggested a separate Council meeting to discuss these
issues. Director of Public Works Jahn projected that response reports would extend until February 2005.
A Council member voiced objection to continuing city expenditures for jet noise. It was suggested Medina might
organize with the City of Seattle, who was also impacted. City Manager Schulze stated the city had budgeted
$25,000 for 2004 to spend on jet noise. A Council member indicated the city had spent about $100,000 on jet noise
during the last 15 years. Mayor Odermat suggested it might be best to wait until the full Council was present before
making any decisions regarding jet noise.
Mayor Odermat commented there was interest in expanding the playground equipment at Medina Park. Director of
Public Works Jahn stated the Park Board would be reviewing each park and presenting their work plan to the
Council. They were starting to gather the master plan that had been missing for a long time.
A Council member outlined on the white board suggested steps to be taken for the 2005 budget goal process, and
to begin at the same operating expense level as for 2004. It was suggested staff monitor sales tax revenues for
inclusion of Medina Elementary School construction -related expenditures. Mayor Odermat suggested Council
members attend the Association of Washington Cities budgeting seminar in Lynnwood during July or in
Leavenworth in August.
The Council approved the 2005 Budget Goals and Process, as follows:
• No change to budget policies;
• Consider a September 2004 ballot measure if 1-864 is certified.
• Category expenditure review instead of line item review,
• SR-520 and emergency preparedness special projects, and
• Targets include no growth in operating expenses.
Cable Television Franchise Renewal —City Manager Schulze explained the city's fifteen -year franchise
agreement with Comcast would expire on July 31, 2006. Federal law established a process for franchise agreement
renewal which allowed a cable television operator to initiate negotiations three years prior to the expiration date.
Comcast had notified the city of their desire to begin the renewal prccess. Additionally, the Cities and Towns of
Clyde Hill. Hunts Point, Newcastle, Beaux Arts Village, and Yarrow Point were also in the process of considering
franchise renewal with Comcast. Representatives from the cities and towns had met with a consultant to discuss a
joint negotiation process, which would significantly reduce the cost of consultant services to each individual
organization. In addition to the reduced costs for consultant fees, the city would also benefit from a collaborative
effort representing a population of more than 15.000 people rather than 3,000. which meant five times more
potential subscribers for Comcast. He had heard positive feedback regarding a consultant who was currently
working with other local cities, including Kirkland, Bothell, and Mountlake Terrace. City Manager Schulze requested
direction regarding the goals for the cable television franchise agreement. Service levels, fiber optic cable, cable
service for Internet access, providing senior citizen discounts for cable service, upgrades, location of service lines,
and community access channels were part of the negotiations which could be conducted. Additionally, Clyde Hill
had language in adopted ordinance form which required under grcunding of utilities whenever there was an
upgrade of the service. City Attorney Wines interjected Medina's proposal included a clause indicating the electrical
service was underground and the other utilities must be as well. Medina currently did not have the Clyde Hill clause
which stipulated any upgrade must be done underground. City Manager Schulze offered to ensure a community
survey was conducted to determine what residents would like to receive from their cable television service. The
consultant would also review the language regarding the city receiving equipment from Comcast to operate a
government access channel. Mayor Odermat did not want to see Medina Council meetings on public television
City Attorney Wines noted the city had the right to use the public access channel and the facilities Comcast
maintained in Seattle. If Medina staff wanted to go to the Seattle facility, they could prepare a presentation for
public broadcast. A Council member suggested the monthly cost to individual households be part of the negotiation
package, as television cable prices increased every year. When asked if the city could obtain a cap on cable cost
increases, City Manager Schulze replied it would be difficult for Medina to object to every rate increase He
City Council Meeting Minutes
June 14, 2004
Page 6
cautioned if one municipality backed out, the others would be unable to enter into the Interlocal agreement,
because the economies of scale would no longer be present. Council member Blazey moved, seconded by Council
member Phelps, to approve entering into the Interlocal Agreement for Cable Television Consulting Services with
Comcast. Council member Vall-Spinosa amended the motion to keep the Council apprised of the issues and what
was being negotiated, which met with Council consensus. Council member Adam added an amendment that
Medina's $6,200 expenditure portion should come out of the 2004 t udget. The Council unanimously voted to
approve the Interlocal Agreement for Cable Television Franchise Renewal, with the two suggested amendments.
City Hall Summer Hours —City Manager Schulze noted during the May 24, 2004 Study Session, the Council had
moved discussion of city hall summer hours to tonight's meeting. Several members of the Council had expressed
concern with the customer service implications of closing City Hall on Fridays during summer months, while other
ones considered extended hours on Monday through Thursday and the additional beach parking on Fridays to be a
customer service improvement. He had conducted a survey of city hall business hours using comparable cities. A
Council member stated beach park use was the reason she had proposed closing City Hall on Fridays during the
summers because the customer service the city wanted to provide users superseded the policy of being closed on
Fridays. Mayor Odermat stated administratively, it had been worked out so that every other weekend, staff
members were able to have four day weekends, but yet still provide fill coverage for citizens. A Council member
added City Hall would still be open 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. five days a week, and extra parking spaces would be
available as a result of the proposed employee flextime hours. City Manager Schulze assured the Council staff
understood if this summer schedule did not work, changes would need to be made. The Council approved summer
hours for staff, provided there was no change to City Hall business hours.
Emergency Preparedness —City Manager Schulze noted the city was spinning its wheels with emergency
preparedness efforts. The needed resources were not presently available. He requested direction regarding the
Council's desires and expectations for emergency preparedness. This direction would assist staff with development
of a recommended 2005 emergency preparedness budget, as well as assist emergency preparedness volunteers
to focus their efforts appropriately. A Council member suggested he Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
position should be expanded. City Manager Schulze relayed the difficulty in reaching the public, even though the
Medina Newsletter, Medina Days surveys and special mailings had been utilized. Despite repeated efforts to
encourage residential participation in the Strengthening Preparedness Among Neighbors (SPAN) Program, the
turnout had been disappointing. He emphasized the city needed to identify better ways of marketing emergency
preparedness. Further, many residents did not continuously live in Medina. Mayor Odermat suggested Council
members contact residents and ask them to become involved in neighborhood SPAN meetings. A Council member
commented it was difficult to mobilize residents when there was a public perception of not being concerned about
emergencies due to the Police Department, emergency crews, well trained firefighters and prepared hospital
personnel. Mayor Odermat stated all of the medical doctors in Media had been identified. A Council member
suggested needed emergency preparedness items should be identified in the budget. By consensus, the Council
requested that City Manager Schulze factor the needed emergency preparedness resources into the 2005 budget.
Council Agenda Calendar —Future Council agenda items were discussed.
Medina Park Dog Control —A Council member suggested that Medina Park dog control originally scheduled for
the August 9. 2004 Council meeting should be moved to the July 12, ?004 meeting. It was also proposed citizens
send letters or speak at the July 12 meeting, rather than drag It out in an August public hearing. City Attorney
Wines advised it was not necessary to allow public testimony. Also, any action the Council took would be at a
public meeting. He advised both sides could be allowed 15 minutes with a spokesperson for each side, or the
public could speak for three minutes each. A Council member suggested ten minutes for each side, then a ten-
minute rebuttal period for each team. Mayor Odermat polled the Council regarding allowing residents to individually
speak, which met with no objections.
Lucius Bigelow, 2425 Evergreen Point Road, distributed a petition containing signatures. He did not know
whether the signatures were all those of Medina residents. A Council member suggested the petition should only
contain signatures of Medina residents. City Attorney Wines advised if the Council were to allow public testimony, it
should be for the entire public. Mr. Bigelow suggested a cooperative process by which those wishing to speak work
something out without controversy that would benefit all park users. I-e offered to write an ordinance amendment
that would relate to dog use in the park. Mr. Bigelow suggested staff talk to City of Kirkland personnel for alternative
ideas. Perhaps then a public hearing would not be needed, and there would be no controversy. His hope that
Council members, the City Attorney, staff and citizens could work together toward a common goal of finding
something that would satisfy everyone and avoid controversy. He had also suggested to Mayor Odermat with City
City Council Meeting Minutes
June 14,2004
Page 7
Attorney and Chief of Police approval, citizens could be deputized to enforce the ordinance. Mr. Bigelow noted a
study conducted in 1989 could perhaps be discussed with the Park Boa d. He requested that the Council defer any
action for now. Mr. Bigelow also requested time to discuss the Medina Park dog control issue more with Director of
Public Works Jahn. A Council member emphasized the city had not take-i a position on dog control in the park.
Mayor Odermat suggested the local television stations and newspapers be notified of this meeting. ( Yikesl Did I
really suggest television stations be notified? If so, I misspoke! What I intended to convey was that all local
newspapers be notified.) City Attorney Wines recommended citizens take turns speaking for or against dog control
in the park, as it might be difficult for each side to elect a spokesperson. He requested that staff draft some
recommended procedures and provide them to the Council. The Council agreed to hear the Medina Park dog
control issue at the July 12, 2004 meeting.
Discussion of SR-520 Issues —The Council thought a special meeting would be needed to discuss the issues
surrounding SR-520. City Manager Schulze reminded Council members the disciplinary reports would be available
for review in a couple of weeks, and suggested appointing a couple of Council members to represent them. Council
member Phelps nominated Council member Rudolph and Deputy Mayor Nunn. Mayor Odermat thought there may
be some items which may only require a "no comment' response i' the Council agreed with them. She also
commented staff did not have the time to add disciplinary reports to their tasks. City Manager Schulze suggested
they could be completed on a contract basis.
Authorize Purchase Agreement for Park Property —Per RCW 42.30.110(c), Mayor Odermat announced
discussion of land acquisition would take place later this evening in Executive Session, and the Council would
reconvene approximately 15 minutes after recessing into Executive Session.
Authorize City Manager to fill Administrative Assistant Position —City Manager Schulze relayed staff had
reviewed reconfiguration of the City Clerk office area. and could make room for a third desk, despite the crowded
conditions that would result. The photocopier would be moved to the hallway under the mail machine to make room
for a third desk. He explained that person would serve as a recording secretary, fulfill receptionist duties, and also
be an administrative assistant for the City Manager. City Manager Schulze cautioned there could possibly be a
budget amendment, which would include passport revenue fees that had been generated. A Council member
objected to the extra cost beyond what was currently paid to the present recording secretary, as he did not see any
benefit to making the position full time. City Manager Schulze responded it was absolutely a full time position. It
was already a position that was part of a proposal which had been formerly approved by the Council. Further, it was
a benefit to the city and gave Medina's citizens an employee dedicated to answer the phones and serve at the front
counter. Mayor Odermat inquired how the present Recording Secretary had previously been able to handle the
duties of City Clerk as well as take minutes. Recording Secretary Wed and responded she had worked many extra
hours without compensation, and had never charged the city for the unpaid overtime she had worked while serving
as City Clerk.
A Council member inquired whether a full time Information Services Coordinator was needed. City Manager
Schulze explained the duties of the Information Services Coordinator. A Council member suggested hiring a half
time Recording Secretary and a half time Information Services Coordinator. That Council member also inquired
whether full benefits were required for part time personnel. City Manager Schulze stated benefits were prorated,
based upon the number of hours part time personnel worked. The possibility of contract employees was raised. in
order to eliminate having to later on pay money for state retirement. If there were a sudden downturn, the city could
eliminate that position. City Manager Schulze stated a position could be eliminated whether it was for full time, part
time or a contract person- The union contracts contained a provision that allowed the city to lay off a union position.
Council member Phelps moved to make the Administrative Assistant position full time, seconded by Council
member Blazey. The Council authorized the Administrative Assistant position, with Council members Adam and
Vall-Spinosa opposed, and Mayor Odermat, Council members Phelps and Blazey in favor.
NEW BUSINES
Reconsideration of Medina Elementary School Special Use Permit Decision —City Attorney Wines explained
there were provisions in the Code for reconsideration of decisions, but they must be based on specified grounds
and must be made by a specific party. He did not see a necessity for reconsideration. A Council member noted the
Council had not seen the final school design, but had trusted that the elevation would not present the impact of a
massive box. That Council member continued if any part of the footprint changed later on, he wanted it to again be
a Council agenda item. It was pointed out the Council had approved ti-e plans in their packets. The ones that were
City Council Meeting Minutes
,lune 14, 2004
Page 8
being discussed during the Special Use Permit public hearing on June 7, 2004 were different. Another Council
member stated the Council had approved a footprint, but not elevations. Director of Community Development
Ceilings stated his intention to be vigilant regarding building massinc. He added the Computer Aided Drafting
Design presentation would depict the school from all angles. His plan was to bring the entire proposal back to the
Council if there was any deviation that related to the Council decision criteria. He continued all the proposals he
had seen mitigated massing toward the neighbors. The overall massing directed toward the neighbors was
mitigated through roof modulation, articulated walls and windowed walls. A Council member did not think the entire
Council knew what they had approved. He opined that was why the City attorney had requested that the exhibits be
numbered. A Council member requested updated site plans, including elevations for Medina Elementary School.
Discussion followed surrounding the Council decision during the June 7, 2004 public hearing. Community
Development Director Gellings stated the decision could be made whether or not the application was consistent
with the Council's decision when the applicants moved into the building permit procedure
Presentation in June Study Session Regarding R-16 Lots --The Council decided not to review a code change
regarding tree houses. They also decided not to grant Mr. Koch time on the June Study Session agenda for a
presentation regarding an R-16 Medina lot, and suggested his was a urique situation that should be considered for
a variance.
Discussion of what to Include in Future Council Minutes —The Council decided to defer discussion of this item.
Discussion of Council Retreat —The Council also decided to discuss review of the Council Retreat during the
June Study session.
Computer Aided Drafting Design Presentation —The Council unan mously wished to hear a Computer Aided
Drafting Design animated presentation by Medina Elementary School architects in the June Study Session.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Council member Phelps moved, seconded by Council member Biazey, to recess into Executive Session at 11:49
p.m. Mayor Odermat announced the Council would recess into Executive Session to discuss land acquisition, per
RCW 42.30.110(c), and possibly personnel matters. per RCW 42.30.110(g), and contemplated reconvening in
approximately fifteen minutes. The Council recessed into Executive Session at 11:49 p.m., and the meeting
reconvened at 12:55 a.m.
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Odermat announced the Council would schedule a special Council meeting in City Hall on June 21, 2004 at
6 00 p.m. to consider adoption of an ordinance initiating eminent domair proceedings for acquisition of property.
ADJOURNMENT
Council member Blazey moved, seconded by Council member Adam, to adjourn the meeting at 12:56 a.m., and the
motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Mary Odermat
Attest:
Caroll P. Wedlund, Recording Secretary
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION MINUTES
June 28, 2004 Medina City Hall
7:00 PM 501 Evergreen Point Road
Mayor Odermat called the Council Study Session to order at 7:06 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present Council members Miles Adam, Drew Blazey, Katie Phelps, Deputy Mayor Todd Nunn and
Mayor Mary Odermat
Absent: Council members Bob Rudolph and Pete Vall-Spinosa
Staff Present: City Manager Doug Schulze, City Attorney Kirk Wines, Director of Public Works Shel Jahn,
Director of Community Development Joseph GE:Ilings, and Recording Secretary Caroll
Wedlund
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Odermat relayed the following:
The Green Store hearing will take place in King County Superior Court on Friday, July 2, 2004 at 8:30 a.m.
• Medina's citizen representatives for the SR-520 project, Steve Broback and Laurel Preston, have called a
meeting from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. on June 29, 2004 at Overlake Golf and Country Club.
• Mayor Odermat congratulated the Police Department for receiving the Association of Washington Cities
2004 Municipal Achiever of the Year Award for Medina's work with the Coalition of Small Police Agencies.
City Manager Schulze announced the following:
• Association of Washington Cities will conduct an annual budget workshop in Lynnwood July 29-30, 2004.
Any interested Council members should contact him.
• The Regional Transit Committee Caucus was accepting nominations for an open alternate position. Anyone
interested should contact him, as nominations must be submitted by July 30, 2004.
• City Manager Schulze gave the Council a briefing on municipal court jurisdiction issues.
COMPUTER AIDED DRAFTING AND DESIGN PRESENTATION
Community Development Director Gellings stated computer aided drafting and design software (CADD) was
used by architects and other designers to present a three-dimen>ion moving animation. The design had
undergone some refinement since presentation to the public in a community meeting at Medina Elementary
about two weeks prior to the June 7, 2004 Special Use Permit public haaring.
Imad Bahbah, Architect for McGranahan Architects, 2111 Pacific, Suite 100, Tacoma, 98402, explained he
was the project manager for the Medina Elementary School design team. He clarified CADD was a design tool
that helped them study massing, window and door locations. There was still some detailing to be finished.
Andrew L. Cottrill, of McGranahan Architects, noted the difference between rendered images and a model
was the sun created shadows on rendered images. He presented a 360 degree panorama of the proposed
school, as well as views from different perspectives
Mr. Bahbah distributed copies of design renderings to Council members, and requested that they be made
available for the public at the front counter. A Council member suggested the copies be marked "draftand
Mayor Odermat added they should also be date stamped. Mayor Odermat noted since discussion of the CADD
presentation had not been scheduled for this evening, the Council would need to discuss anything related to the
proposed school at another meeting, it that was necessary.
DISCUSSION
City Facilities —City Manager Schulze explained discussion of city facilities was a follow up to Council direction
dating back to October 2003. He had included in the packets all options that had been provided to date by the
city facilities architect, Frank Lawhead. The options and schematics in Council packets were not intended to be
design preferences, but rather programmatic types of examples There was agreement among Council
members more space was needed for city facilities.
City Manager Schulze stated the first six options represented a stand-alone Police Department of approximately
5,000 to 6,000 square feet. Over time and as design was refined, that square footage could change. A Council
member asked about the advantages and disadvantages to having City Hall tied together with the Police
Department. City Manager Schulze stated the advantages of having a combined facility. such as avoiding
duplication of various staff needs, telephone systems, computer systems and office equipment, Also, it was
more efficient to have one of the key members of the management team in the same building. There were also
City Council Study Session Minutes
June 28,2004
Page 2
benefits to having a stand alone police facility, such as officers not having to be in a public park with loaded
weapons. Upon occasion, there were also arrests or police interrogation of suspects, which were good reasons
to have a stand alone facility. City Manager Schulze stated having a police facility at the end of a street made it
easy to block an ingress and egress point. However, in reality the chances of that happening were fairly slim, as
typically, the officers were patrolling the city.
City Manager Schulze continued if the Police Department were not co -located with City Hall, it would be
possible to remodel the lower level to house staff. A Council member stated staff was delivering service with the
present square footage, so he did not think the most efficient route wa3 expanding to four times that size for two
facilities. That Council member also suggested the Council should agree on funding before proceeding any
further. Another Council member opined a bond measure could be submitted for citizen vote for either remodel
of City Hall or a new police facility, but it was not necessary to fund both expansion and a new police facility.
Mayor Odermat reminded the Council that they had previously decided there were considerable cost savings by
hiring employees to replace consultants, and City Hall did not have extra room for staff. Deputy Mayor Nunn
suggested City Hall be increased to house both the Police Department and staff. He voiced pessimism about
acquiring property to house the Police Department. Deputy Mayor Nunn also recommended the integrity of the
building should be preserved. Mayor Odermat joined with Council member Adam and Deputy Mayor Nunn as
advocates for what could be done with the existing City Hall, while maintaining the integrity of the building. It
was suggested the Council be provided with options for reasonable expansion of City Hall on the existing
property that would meet functional requirements for both staff and the Police Department. That information
would help them to determine a rough cost estimate. Mayor Odermat :suggested all Council members visit Clyde
Hill's City Hall to see what was available for their staff and Police Department before discussing Medina's
facilities.
The Council gave direction for the next city facilities steps as follows:
• Plan for use of existing property, rather than for new property.
• Meet functional needs through a reasonable expansion.
• Provide cost estimates for options.
City Hall Trash Enclosure and City Hall Portable Office —City Manager Schulze furnished background
information regarding the history of the trash enclosure near Cily Hall. When the Dustin property was
purchased, four additional parking spaces had been created. The trash enclosure near City hall took two
spaces, so there had been a net gain of two parking spots. City Manager Schulze presented options for
consideration. It would cost at least S10,000 for a two -month period 'or a vehicle and driver if employees were
shuttled from off site to City Hall. Another option suggested by a Council member was placing the portable office
at the Public Works site, as that would add four available parking spaces at the beach. Another Council member
suggested placing the portable office elsewhere was not a feasible so ution, as the Director of Public Works was
frequently at City Hall. A Council member remarked easing the parking restrictions when the Blue Angels came
to town might help to reduce complaints regarding tickets issued. Director of Public Works Jahn thought the city
had 16-17 parking spots around City Hall. It was suggested employees commute by car pool to reduce the
number of parking spaces used by staff. Mayor Odermat pointed out staff members did not live in the same
neighborhoods. Further, what would happen if an employee needed to run an errand for the city in the middle of
the day? Also, staff members often carried work -related material, and employees took work home at night. She
was not in favor of removing staff parking spaces, nor forcing long-distance employee commuters to car pool, as
such action would make working conditions more difficult for them. Deputy Mayor Nunn suggested the Council
do nothing. A Council member agreed, adding the Blue Angels should be part of community relations. City
Manager Schulze clarified strict enforcement had begun when angry citizens had complained about people from
Bellevue who visited over the lunch hour parking on landscaping and causing property damage. Another Council
member agreed with Deputy Mayor Nunn. No decision was made to relocate the trash enclosure that was
currently near City Hall. Mayor Odermat, Deputy Mayor Nunn and Council member Phelps were not in favor of
moving the portable office because of access to City Hall. Council members Adam and Blazey were in favor of
moving it to the Public Works site. No action was taken regarding the sortable office
Beach Park and City Hall Parking —The Council decided to address the Medina Beach Park and City Hall
parking problem with facility planning.
City Manager Duties and Authority —CM Schulze explained durinc the past year, questions had been raised
regarding authority delegated to him for entering into contracts and agreements. As a result of the increased
level of concern regarding this matter, the City Attorney had been asked to research the subject and provide an
City Council Study Session Minutes
June 28, 2004
Page 3
opinion, which was in the Council packets. The City Attorney had opined in order to avoid misunderstandings or
confusion, many cities had drafted ordinances setting forth the extent of authority which the Council delegated to
administrative staff. City Manager Schulze stated Resolution No. 42 had been adopted by the Council in 1961,
and defined the duties of the City Manager. That Resolution had not been rescinded or amended, even though it
was clearly outdated. Resolution No. 42 was silent regarding the subject of contracts and agreements. A
Council member voiced unwillingness to authorize the City Manager to enter into settlement agreements.
Another Council member thought it was important to be involved with the union contracts as well as the personal
service contracts for some of the higher level managers. City Manager Schulze clarified number 11 did not
suggest the Council would not be involved with union negotiations. Further, the Council would have to ratify an
employment contract. He suggested since Resolution No. 42 was outdated, it could be rescinded. Deputy Mayor
Nunn and Council members Adam and Blazey voiced objection to the present wording in number 11 and
requested more specificity. Following further discussion, the contracting authority ordinance was moved to the
August 9, 2004 Council meeting, with the following changes:
• Change paragraph F on page 3 to include extensions and renewals.
• Reword number 11 to provide more specificity.
Historic Preservation Options —Director of Community Development Gellings recommended the Council
discuss options for an historic preservation program and provide direction to staff if such a program was desired.
He noted recently local home designer Karen Crenshaw had brought to the Council's attention an historic barn
structure at 7722 Overlake Drive West. An associate of hers had recently purchased this property with the
intention of developing three homes on it. She had asked if the Council would consider creating incentives to
preserving the barn. He explained another representative of that organization was present this evening. Mayor
Odermat, Deputy Mayor Nunn and Council member Blazey did not see any public benefit from creating
incentives to preserving the barn. The Council decided not to proceed with the Historic Preservation proposal.
2004 Retreat Agreements —A Council member emphasized it was incumbent upon staff to clarify and publish
the protocol for public speaking during Council meetings. The 2004 Retreat Agreements were accepted by the
Council and moved to the August 9, 2004 Council meeting for action.
Medina Park Dog Control Public Hearing —The July 12, 2004 public hearing for Medina Park dog control was
moved back to City Hall. The Council decided upon a light system for speaker time limits, with a yellow light as a
30 second warning, and a red one to signify the speaker should stop speaking. City Attorney Wines suggested
each speaker be given three minutes, and that three to four citizens should be called at a time. Further, the
written speaker procedures would be needed prior to that public hearing. It was agreed the Council would not
answer questions from the speakers or from the audience. Their role was to listen to the comments, after which
they would discuss the issues and render a decision
Council Agenda Calendar —Future Council agenda items were discussed. It was decided the City Manager's
performance review should be discussed in Executive Session at 6:00 p.m. prior to the July 12, 2004 public
hearing. A Council member requested time during a future study session to discuss some points in Ordinance
No. 600 for building permit timeliness standards. City Manager Schulze had distributed Ordinance No. 600 a
couple of weeks prior. City Manager Schulze stated there was room on the September Study Session agenda.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Council decided by consensus to recess into Executive Session at 9:52 p.m. to discuss land acquisition, per
RCW 42.30.110(c), and possibly personnel matters, per RCW 42.3C.110(g), and contemplated reconvening in
approximately fifteen minutes, at which time they would adjourn. The Council recessed into Executive Session
at 9:52 p.m. At 10:08 p.m., Council member Adam moved, secondec by Council member Blazey to reconvene,
and the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
Council member Adam moved, seconded by Council member Blazey, to adjourn at 10:08 p m., and the motion
carried unanimously.
Mayor Mary Ddermat
Attest:
Caroll P. Wedlund, Recording Secretary
CITY OF MEDINA
Memorandum
DATE: July 12, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jan Burdue, CPFA
RE: Finance Report —.Lune 2004
COMMENT:
General Fund
Rey, enues
Item F-3
Sales and Use Tax is slightly below ($47,040) the projected S500,000 for
this time of vear.
investment Interest is sliehily below (SI,115) the projected S25,000 for this time
of year
Municipal Court Traffic Infraction is S18,�S19 above the projected S47,500 for this
time of year.
Liquor Control Board Profits is S1,6 )0 above the projected S9,000 for this time of
year.
Expenditures
Departmental expenditures are meetin_ bud,;ct projections.
— _
r x�
_
_ _ _ _
_i
_ c -
o � _
��
=
�
y
� ��I
III � I.I I�i
T
V
_
'J
Y'
_ JG
� H _ _I
__
P
_
�
_
it
� it
4�
_
-
_
n
1
T JAI
T
o
� �
! _
� —
— �. i
T
'T If.l
�I
I
l_�
F
1
i ��
III
y. F A II
t Y _
_ -
v _
- �
� �
A
�Li
F'.. ii
L
_
G
_ S
_
T
_ f ! I�il���
�''
�
t
�i
III..
'i
p
�
f
r —
r ��I
^, � III
—
r
f,
— I:I
G
y
-
-_
_ r
�'
A `
! �it
r T
�
���
r s �. I r :Ili
1
.�
y ; ..
.,. _
L e G
_ � Y —
�� _ _ _ .. i. -
_ e
— 5 ..
NIIN14LY FED:;
PUPET TY m _.-....E. --_.
_.. _`_ _ _..
Gen' Prop 77,01 .A_ _"e_i
.,_] . __
Loca_ .,eca__ oa_c-
3_3 _ .- OC
__gin -t _
._ _:.. ._ ..J
3-,"i^a _ ._i__
sts
T.0 n _..S_ r .-: '_ S
=VTERGCVER_N)1E117:' _L
Al 3 1 ..: _s co
_...gym.. Grant- 3 ___ _ __ __,.
._0,5
SS ate -_a.IC iJ
_ :-__� 36 21 G:
"E" r imiLa LS-:c_-'c^
C1 335 16 __ K
WET ::mina: ius_'-e DCD 41
_.,_ __ . 316 11 23 :1
4,E: __-r_ s. .,____
,__ 'ZC 03C 336 56 :.. 00
WET __.-._na_ Jas[_c=_-DCE ,_
D_ l0 336 05 26 GO
Cc1r _al J'Jsc S e^_:al
-'0 _36 Ei _. �..
cu: 'ter _r __
! : _36 26 34 Doi
Incr Ex"se Tait
__ oc . __a __ .,s 10
ecnts Point Psllcw " __-_-
3 23 J�1 0)
CAGE FCC .,____ ti.is GD27=_
.71 liz 0 00 _._ Jil .., __
Passport
FINES n ECP. " =REE
,._ .. : 00 A3 ,. 20 00
Municipal Coorn 7raf, 7 infra_
TOTAL F'_NF5 . FCRFZ: __.__S
747SCELLANECUS PF%D.-_
:0 33. ._ 07
:r:veaz,._.t .._e l4_
V3 _,,_„ ...
Hales
.._ _ 31 7 '? �CC OC
Cont r i b ue_xs 3t ecr
90 D9 D0
Other
-CTA- h'ISC__ ____ ENDES
NOVRE'e ENUES
m_ _ . ME 369 is " 10
Other Ncr de nue_s Cass chri'
T's AL NCNRE ✓ENUES
C"___.
-
1_-30
54
4._1�
,...q _
z_,_
JEJ
Ac
..-11
14
_3 _.
-.353.49
--_
_.__._
_36.L
125
90C.7C
47,11 -.
T 12104
HER
;(). 2i)O 4
NT-'MP2a- 7EI- R
1b ^/1 1,()-j
Jutl% ii)_ 2004 _
It) 7i ( /O4
HX
JL W ;ii- -200 4
L9
49
aneccs
A-,. D _.., ..
1 (_!( i-4
Jana 30. 2004
z I'7 2eiSo['.ne_ 6eGe
-THEE SE:.7_i__._
VCR ."^:i5_ __,S'-:5._ ____C7-
Tom_.,.. ?IY.A`!CE G__r._._.`^ .,
.".na
e-
TC1AL :..-_.-.L ..n-�_..�.
.277r_.1 E..___0171-_
JUlw il) 2004
>EasoKNEL E;_NE__—;
Per S. __ Re`e__��
JTHEE SER71__..
a a ..Le
plot e na S
Pcscage _____
T—, a-v 1 1 __a .--j
7 _ _ 7 41 00
Acver. ising
:,. na k ,.,
Insurance ;wl2:A
Reps r Mai r Pnent
qy__
'Hzsc
_ UA 00 518 1J 49 3C
NewsAt_er
7WA HE'. 1--3
7 D FA L ET._._. _..
Z1ENS EJ
Vj _�
�. _..a. _- .-2.c9
20 a,21 _.,..
ny
4.9
_---
- " " -3 3
..> OW 1 3
.. -.'93 10
,007.:., :4
53
--3.30
1.,,.D.. __
--.,.10
`-__
133 41Z .07
�55.'_
n
_ » __... -_
2z,3CJ __
51._'
Tllllc; il)_ 2O0 1
___.
49
Puget
East 1e "__- -_C_.
b ;1 04
Jung 30, 2004
R=ITNES_ 3ESHF_.-
pe -scane
z2
_-^AL _RSJN^_ --2=
SU?PL idS
--I 20 '_1 00
of `_ire
G �_ -�
F'011r`e Coerce-.--=�
_21 c0 3
SLrc
s2- 29 _ 6
mm,. Range 7a
_3 2G
'Lealms
„_4E3 SERV:CSS 4 _3hcGE5
ProEeesi-:e: Ser,
20 41 50
Recr'1=c 71J=_�kgro
�= GO
CDFMa. _catcocs P-- - _
4-'. ,..
RecrLLCree_^.--A,
4
nqu'pTere Le ,e
52_ d9 49 23
B_cycie Fa1ro_
;0 32' 27 43
An=ma- ^_cr:fC-
10; _0 c2l =0 49 a'
Dies r-,.,e'^ -
2 <0 -_ e0
_--_me Pre`e^ __..._._ 53aC
—D JCO 5__ 20 49 90
M15c-1ave5t:ga[i,e ?'.:sd
"'09'AL CTHEER SER9__
94
:2_
C? ^11 2%o�—I
Tuna 30. 200_1
_...
..1Tti`7
37 Access n„_
51 jd__ _----
_ .__ ... .._ZC 11 o. sonef ._a_ __
�a __ ,.. :,-ne __._.., _
'CT .N`-- o R..
T,____ UEFA -
ME
!_ _ ._6._ ENEE')
n„ 5_? m
h 7/ 1 2104
. HIC 30, _2004
--
�0
,:)-A 2 _
�b 1 /fl-4
�- ___F_
SAi.:_..__„ � WA..
TOTA:. or..... ___ 1 a?._-_
,. --+ -. Pe___
P EFFOG.._ :. =E_.__
JYF.-B SER,;:Cz9 a 7HA_ =_
0 _:.-1 EC 41 .,_ __ag --cca_ W.1, :. _ -_nr
4 0., Ai ., ., _raves ._a_n_Pc
TOTA:. DTj::nlrr
o2"ya
An
_�..�C
9
1A
115_:2
13
Iun� 3n. 2001 : yr
-- - - ---
3c__r-
,411le 30. 2004
DRs-
-NN:SC
YI CT] As _Ed _- _1 ..a______ & 'Wages
TCT-,L a __._. .. .,_..., .__
GUPPLT?�_
_ _., 31 oc Opera _ Eupc'_-es
;C IES
_TaBa 1 _e-..?.-,Ps
,_ -_- '1 7 .- 00 PrOr `e ____ ac__.er
121 _00 P31 _56 61 U 0_ Plann_ o __v__[anl
.. -SF I' 4. 02 rearing_e-
.__ -ic J " 513 Go __ 51 Lvnus"p- non- Oman-
1 1 0 C I I _ MCP _ oI Mnstrut 110 .M1 it 1 7a::Z-1
_93 O) Commu `ions
..OJ "c: 5 5 A Ed 45 j 0 Trawl r __-_..
'r Du- "d 50 4 , 00 Dues S-Lscr_c ns ye -fie rnip
01 0 30C. J 14 j Fur=mo . EquipmeM7
-_._emu =P __ 0 7HAPIDES
7'PL ., tip ,._ 'AE!i-
_,_
:4
-:
121.:_
1
zy
500_l::
-_1
..n
1 S
_2.24
,.._ _
-7J
,..
3..,
3
=10-77
U.,.70
June l)_ 2004
D_��-.___:.._.
TC7AL
___ z r
.;_ .._sma.
Dols;"^ -: -..�
_CT?-
CTHEE SEE9=CE3 e
4- p0
_ravel Y _ze
Tuns :'10 �00
Over[ T-
C_.:. rc
-o :^ Oper u s
TO -Al,
SF,RVT -- t
prof essioca- ._.es
-.5 d3 4= C4 profpS�Iona- e
4Teleph e�-tea,,_
3' 43 CS Travel
Read-1 I Ad-[' ':li1_I`.'.`•:-
3." _ 49 BC M 1 s c
TOS.n, HER - R..._-72
.___
_.,_ _T?1. ' l=LA_
pa I- __=e^ier. s
00 F. rn . ¢_ any
"AL C;..,
_-
-
43
-9C..4
334.
.{uno 3o..1 04
o3?.T
i'� ... .._ egaip.
=00.00
PAGE
Juua 30. 200=4
REPLACE14LGT 3_TZ
0"'4ER cT_VAnr ., SC':Q=E9
_95 _.. CO 00 Sale c c-_rrecC croocrcy
`I `J - 0 p0 Equip —. raace cover-9S
T R."Sic?Eg5
lb71 /t)1
Jung 10. _004
- = o R CFE_ATED
DESCRIPT:-
L yU':'ME`TT F.EPLACEY.F.::T
CAPITAL OUTLAY
30 Adm._n °inmenc
v
5u Cp Police �.v� moo:Ie
,c- .0., __ 3., '4 00 Plblic Works Eyv
^OT.AL CA=!—;%L CLTLAi
T CTn._, _VU -MEN:'
. i.64.z, i,700.00
xo.6==,i35.5.
-_.4cA3 3�
39
JO
�.:.. 75..�.
.
64
- 4j12c.�_
h ?/ 1 ,/ )-4
c. Y C_ 'sr_.4 :a
.Tilde 30- 2004
n ____._ :S!"MEFR
7ESCRI?T DJD]
__iTERGOVERNMENTA- RE`.'ESUS
motor ,ae_ Ta:{".jRre6C= :wed
"0 38
70 Moor Fuel
Tr, T AI IN'=C JV2kSMEN7.+-
°s �F P.ZMn'N�4iF
S -MATED JTA,
A,: -S 453, 25-0-0'
_ i. .,7.__
�9
6.36
Ci_-: c-
.._.._=a
)4CN7._.
EX-c 7=.
-... PIE: C6:':PAGE
R111C JO.
2004
s 1
.
_—EXPENDED
..
_
.,zc__.
CITY STREET -"..ID
SALARIES :JADES
130,C00 IOC--
- .__
'C
3 ."
'•
--
Op
Sala Tee 6 "daces
"
36
3
F_.2-
i,9oE.2-•
_
Tv=.Ali :,A3I-- rv"
_.,-.2=
PERSONNE?. 3ENEFITS
_
CO
5.
35
= 56.44
i0
00
Benc` Is
_ ._,
_ __ .__
2,,I
200.CC
s
2_
Personnel
00.0
i.
�42
0
..a
00
Unlforne
-'
'-
_
6
3T 200.CC
53-Sd
,�65.$4
TOI'AL PERSONNEL BENL?-=5
{ ..,_
_ .33.
,CAD y STREET MA:NTPNANCa
__
,✓,
B00
J
..2
�U
3':
00
Ooer g Sup es
'
_, Soo
Jo
50C
-='
_
C00
42
30
35
00
Small oole /M-L>r Ecuypmen`
9)
_OC
.Do
n✓7-.@6
_„- 000
.•
,- -,74
6G,COC.00
s.o=
,Di
S4'J
31
4-
CO
Pmfessicnal Services
-_
o J"0-00
7
53
-
u�.�
-�
001
Si:.
.�
4-
1❑
Road r Stree' Ma_.iC Gr-arse
_3 -�=
237-3'
1
_
gv
.
_ CO„
1-0
�
�42
�0
45
^
C_
Machine Rertd-
.03
313.03
_
11
3,500.00
4,000.00
1s
_
=,
344.90
SO
0 r.
4 :,
r �
i,J
;,Ciljt� 9er-,!CeS
�9
_0.3
�.
o00.00
'.
CB
C3.Ol
:;0✓
u"
32
��
�0
00
Equipne t Ma [t. a ^e
92
42
+ 5-3.
'�
5,
_.
4 ,.
LO
_
Coo
uC')
542
40
41
00
BCO L'SI LZ3_n Md 1_... ePaPCe
-
Co
49
�6-4
35
-
)
1°.
4�
CO
Scree L qrm: 'T. 'tiee
_ =
__ ,325.E4
� ,OOC
52
C
1,0
598.I
0'
-
00
-
-
__
542
z
41
Traffic Connro_ Cei-ces
.CO
10
_ 00C
CCJ
>4e
06
41
00
Snow & Ice Removal
-'
12
5 000
OG
1.4a
a 0 2.W
__ C0
:CC
.45
..,
a
:.0
Streec Ciea.i_nq
o
9-
1:
_ __ 000
00
25.91
MEAL ROAD � IT MA:NTiN=,N CE
4c' ✓I . -
,,03
62
.
CAPITAL 31071M
_
-.
-cc
54
OC
Machi e^,✓ and Eq`i F�'er"t-'
_
A:. CAPIT_2:!
T CT A ..
-__
,
- �3{.-_
464.9=
494, 952.00
38
A6
3CE,43;._9
_(1T_AL CITY DYKE E'_' FCND
_, ..
_o�,
EESC4IP: ICY
-RE:! c SID
MISCELLIINECCS REVENUE
V-Yeven'es T-,ee Neolacs
�.'.i
`:SCE LANFCUS RZ-7EVLE
+L : REE FL7%D
MCrr,rs-
June 0.2004
M,?._.
C-CT jM:l ED '...?J. =:{P EC:NT:
.>> SC d✓4.SC �... G00.✓0 533--"�
4' 8-4
�-4.P)
b �/ 12/0-1
Cgs"'-=T:GV "-----`
=s
i
00 OC REF:. ..o:4�'C gXco _.�... - �`
,3.2� -4-
TOTAL w.?S - `
a - �' 4-i9.35 .:-k'
-CTA CFP °nCJEC"'S' �'-,1'D - -
ONT3
Rine 30. 2004
v - D.
S i:Y�2 :ON c2I➢ _..�_ ^l�::��ES dRe- F'2_ TRo
TREE P 'ND
OTHER SERVICES & �HARSFlS
4° '0 Niecella^eo-..s :Yee 4en =men[
TOTAL -_—HER SERJJ=_S
TOTAL TREE FUL'C
�. '-iExaErmEc
LAN 2
JO
24.-9
82,0E3
.28 �._;.
,, 328. 49
,9
,_24 -
8Z,053
_23
'h /i ,/) 4
- v
:,NT--. xPeN;.TcaE RE ---;a,
PAGE 2L
Julie iU_ 200-4
c.tS r .T_T*=L' e.:,P ::'E^
:.�_ �. tiL21c EP TESCBS PT IOF . _�-,_
PARK PROP. DE27 _r:W =CE :"ND
PARK PROF ::EST PR::IC:?i,L/:NT
-
9 - ' a's`i.N
Princ'nal
- _
IEVII
- A_ 8,2S3,M
" 96 5= 00 IrcereeC
.. .,_ ,. ..... _ -
e,i?3. cO
�o tl. a
: >0 0 - : n
TOTAL Pas` =ROP 7ERT _.._NT-
-,03 �,.
TCTAL PARK pq.. :BHT a:..-.. ^'JC;D
3 132-30 13.-92.50
36,39"i
50
30
30 63 03
�. 5.ig 3i 10
...,u _.._. PACE _-
J1I11% ')0, 2004
CAPITAL PROSE:-S =:
:MPRN.'3MENTS
RcaG cr=:^:cr:cn
Stem _i,ewer Co 'trucri�
Park Im_rovemen_s
Sidewalk -82nc 'vP%tic 8-n S-
PO._ce -ac.:_c_
"O TA_ eMP3CVcM �Id LS
TOTAL CAPIT7,- PRCSEC--
- - 14,220.39 :.3'J,JCn _00
25_.. ..� ..0
-3 .22 3 3 �-,
)21
t� /! 2/04
'_17',' 'Ied:ne
MONTEL'f EN__ _.E2l:a7
CE°CR5?.'1CN ____._.S
VCN RE✓ENL'E -.RIEST ....+_
NON -REVENUES
h3: 0;3 3S? C0 =0 00 Security Acreeme it-.:OhnStor.
41, :J0 J 340 , E2 01 WA SC -Slug Code Fee
M 9 12 52 03 WA St ,:udio_ai ..fc S. 7ems
., J00 �d9 _2 �� 05 WA S.o ace POr_1on
OCd 'o00 339 52 07 WA St -state 308
._ JGC: 3S3 52 OB WA S�-.raurra Care
ICE _JO 339 2 52 09 WA St Lab c1ci P.rea c:2
.:_ -Or "0 36° S.. WA St School Zcne
3 O _o_ ._ 52 97 Dent c_ Lic e ._S
359 12 52 Ea Gun 7_r:ni'_e-Dec F 11c $ 6r2'_
_. 339 .2 S5 Gun Perll" -WA ?atro_ = 0
_39 52 3O WA St PatrO1-4iien .$49;
�2 99 Kiag :'>unCy rt.<--_=-rt9
TOTAL NON -REVENUES
TOTAL NON -REVENUE TRUST 2�,'ND
PACE
EST=MATE ; TOTAL X EC"AT _'.-'.i
-
n01 .70
_OC
n0
_C
,_SO
3-2 10
.00
_,- 3 .53
6,'c9.5_
.JO
.JG
_ 909.31
.,
a.'�_.58
.CO
�3
-
70
-� -42
.00
2 Z'38.42-
_
32
308.d's-
.0
116.82
_.;
L.
fl3.34
u0
01
2B 54
30.J�-
•,�
16. JO
.30
]0
96 irv_
1'.EEO -49
S9,_29.15
'cc
-00
_-9,029
;11 77i 12f0-4
joz OC 559 52 31
._: C0., 5-9 52 03
Co, c2i 539 2 52 'J6
.__ 03 589 12 52 07
JGJ 539 __ 52 GB
d 3 2 1'
S89 12 E2 S8
., 5?C EE9 -S 52 99
sjo OCo 599 90
jC0 �.� S&9 12 52 99
Mmy Ted_ -a
MCNTE:-C , ::'J3_ _P.P^Re
NET^;-a➢S APF -.-- FD
DE
NON-REvEN::E TRUST-...�.-
DION-EXPENDITOP-ES
WA. S--B:cg Code E__
WA St-J'--S
WA St -State P...r-
WA St Stale 0%
WA St -Trauma Care
WA St SC^.JO1 rte
Dept of Lic A -- n ^33
Gun Pens-ts-:)enz of Li 518,21
WA St Pa ol- i PefmlCs 'S24i
WA St Pa'--vl-alien '.$251
King Ccunty-Cri e
TOTAL NGP-E:CP�ND=T JRES
1. 3
102.2)
-00
OC
_G2-0-
DO
28735
3,.
00
.00
,090.,
- -'
20
13 981 28
_90
-7C
13,921.25-
.DO
690-4B
.0C
_.,
-,590.So-
,,,
DO
1,191-1-
c
.0'
00
30. T;J
0
no-JG
c'�
��.00
.00
`^
^.0
00
-JO
95-70-
00
.,2
122 10
.00
492.5_
.30
.30
93.51
:.9
ih 7/1?/U4
Cih ol,\[,�dina
Cl,cck Ra«istel
Junc 30, 2004
PAGE
1
71
'._�li Chi
t_i'rdC�.
VF;NCO3
_ ._
-
\tit[I l.3C
�IlriAI[It
NUMBER DENI:CR �,'GI�E
__S_-_
-_`.-' __� ---- -.�_
'..< C1
_ FAO 010 57_6 �-. _ -0
J
in
14
----=8
90 ru LCv7E'S bS�GF; ": .. �_
Ot
_
_A.'74 cc_ .,o_ O00 =-6 0_ 31 .,_
42 :-
SL?F_I_a
INVC-CE TOTAL
_.5.0
0bj
4 v0 = J M .CI oc_ 000 70.) .__ _., ._ _
__.-.
_
7 473as
CRpM, __NCA
:Nvc:c; _o_W
__._-
2L0 000 OCI i_ 70 _-
4
_Co4d
-. �_..- 30
33ib ^L'flT .� �..-.=' _. r__
Oc
-- _� - -
_ cPEP, y -1TRCEIAsE
j'SL'04 2v0 300 300 592 -_ -2 Jc
_,3c6.61
PROPER
:NNCICE TSTAL
1,m..,D
C5%c3i
:] JC' M'+( c�1 C00 G00 �.25 .� -._ _.,
s,d47..-
,54-
_,84C.00
52FINNICAW K._S:'EN
.'
EMERGENCY °REPA<ED SESS
TNVC:CE TCTA:
3,841,.JC
543
374C3
PnENT
- 0� 3_R_�. RENAL
-
)4 _) 00 .CC E42 3
4-3
=NVCICE T .
6b?8 ICMt`+ YFMBEESH_? RENEWALS
�.--
� 't,0; CO 4=ES- CH EE C^1 ',CC 0..0 _a �- 4F
74
Tom_..-,
_.'4
K:?KLL+ANA-
4o/
,, .34
CM�1rrt,rCn LN
i02-3 NAT': ASSOC C _ -u
36 )',-4
_ :0 - ES .,n_ _oc S__ _.1 .o
n.. LC NC ANr R_�A
T_Wl,'I CE TOT;_
12:. ,
2�8.4d
i05So Cis=.QJ_=M�N"" 'NC
— __ a0o ::3 3_ — �_�
-. -�,�
_:S 4.
_-_
_ _
2ry _1 Ce - __ 3A_uR
Lip,- OL:E :'OTAL
226 "..
020 PACIFIC TOPSCi:�S, iGC.
J6,'l:/04
n MCC :45F5.3 CQ7 ]00 :CC 5-6 3J 41 24
72.21
:9°53
182._2
. CPSC:LS
INVC=�E 7^7AL
--<-
9481C4 Cl_J0C 000 376 30 4_ B4
54.53
:PS;'_LS
jN';=- =;. -L
G4.36
.,41,0_ ml BOG lou _,_ 31 41 _-
39.._
T:PSC:L3
:I CICE -OTAL
.5.4�
jh 7/t2/04
Cite of Medina
Check RcoiStcr
June 30. 200d n
- heel
I1cCl.
VENrCHz
T__E ]. _:II^IT
�.I11P. �lrf
:�.R1011Il1
-.
vl""^tl..e .n +..�H de..E
--
.P-G
00, C D = a--
�6/ i_4 '.� _..
v.._ J(i'] D�� 5 6 5D : ..�
0 4
K
6iD <'NESm
=W _FL. PECNES
=:CTC;ICE :CTAL
33
_ZC �- P_CTH HIL.. ^cl`iG=NE?
_C
ENGINE E3 ]G =NSJL_ANT
9C0
SA=;,KJW L_-
_V6..,__.. __..-...
C6, C� _,4 J "20,'30
.;00 513 _3 49
j'N i00 � CC -
r
12655 3�9iT c, ..O.iGEAS _
INVOICD TCT_�.�
" ': /00
1CI �:' _ a _.. �4 JOa 000 �0 518 30
-
_30...2
?404 SHE:RGARD CP uE L_i �:E
_,__
STC@AGE
7=AL
_Ja- ILL '04 C0I ,DO OCO SIn 3C
STORAGE
I tJ'✓G ICE TO: r.�
-
-4 -._4
__`ss VTHHA:JT _ANTS I:JC
DO 90 qC.-: _ _ CCO S00 i4<" ]J
.. .. 30 e_
P� vT3
I NVCECE .,_.A,.
161C9 WA ST DEFT C^ -IS _N3
�6; iO4 J/GO!0C 4B.J-JE==,/ 62, ODC CJO
'6_53 WELL ^^ED'NA �: R„_Ry '...
- =. �00/9O
=''61 C
c+
PLAv
INVOICE TJT.AL
6350 HOME DEPCT CR_:. ScRVICES
�F:"�_ ., ,:O, JO
MAY'r. O0' 000 C00 576 dC �_ 7C
SUPPL .ES
MAYL _.,_ OOC 000 54:.
SUPPLIES
�coE
96-J0
7600 KC SCL-2i NAL NEaSPA?E2S
06'08%C4 'IO!9C
2C04 3UHSr'. LT V 901 JCO
,,v NU.4_ SL`a3C<=P':'ION
INVOICE TCTA:.
2,:65 'f
4
?93.3
a23_c�
4S 24
0
:cd.34
?5 L
5ti 1
h 1 -/04
cite of Mcdina
chcck Kc�istcr
June 30, 2001
�IsTP-P.:r--N
Chz�k
OATH 1XV,
_'hock
ENr,,a
1,J TNT
�`. 111111)2!
.AIIIOU(lt
NUMBER ✓EI O-R NA',!-'
I6 c0,'J� 2 u "TRh ♦ 7- OCO Coo Ell 11 43 �_
_q6�
__.��
RANDY
.J9"' REED,'HOTEW
_B-_- .,
v•17AM 1-AMMEALS
='SVOIC� 70-AL
1 ]4.�_
��,=._.1R
�_-..
2%O.IO
3_7 A..GLN^ �__
.,c _ .,�
_S
�,:,
:INZIC_ _..,_._.
-4 bn 2500] JOG 000 :21 « 4- _
ACCURINT
36i14; :4 .,: 'COi C9 ✓.'� _,_ 600 C00 542 D3 __ 1,
0, 464.'_..
- z CO
I91_5 AS"PLUNI;H
_I... POPLAR TREES
96 :. i,7A C4 O.,I ;100 CCO 76 SO 42 .._
-- -
_W TEL IFHONES
INVOICE TOTAL
31. L_
- -
VCr CI'"'� "3:,45'GL^8
=50C BELLERRIGA
- jr--TI OE/14; ]4 i -i'):J '0]1 000 :)OC 576 90 -. ��
'�-
_.`
29.4I
RRIGA7L29 METER.
INVC I:_`e: TOTAL
26.41
946 D01 OOC 030 515 5C 49
9=^?
- 225.00
�.
1825 BELLEVUE TREASURER, CTTY
cF C6/14.A4 �,'DD
_ _.
: 'JI ,NTR_^UT:CIIS
IWOTCE IOTA:.
'TTT
6/=4,54 , ;Oi 0 5-43 00. 300 3.7 o21 20 49 60
_26.43
_26.43
18C55 6LRC< T DRPPE:CS
PR II]TTSG
IN7O10E ,C-TAL
_26.42
-'
62 96
230-0 BLLTI GN': HAL-T:IFORMS � _,�UI2Ms:N
' _ 000 ODD 521 So _2 CJ
Jb!-4 04 'J ,]iC0 3554 - -�
In "2
II:VOICE OM-
_: 3-
,5145:-'_ DO"_ OCO 10C 9" 2c 22 _o
o.S]
F^_LIJ7 : 700:11
INVGI=E -ATA2
-_3:
36326_' OCI O00 C30 521 L., 22 40
,_._._.
POL=C:i"H: E
INVOICE 70 AL
363.0.
=4Q4 2004 VASPC CC= 000 200 521 2O 43 CO
221_.-_
_.._-.._
-. 95 SH^N, .,EFFREY
6; ,/Z
HC'TEL MEALS
INVOICE TOTAL
_.._.��
7H1 000 C0� 52 45 'n
'C4 0 C, .._ ';0
_z
2._.
__-_
___,
2560 �_. GROUP
76, :4 _ „_1-
�..
_-
PCL:CE-C:;d_cR LEASE
INVOT.CE TOTA-
2i4
Cite of Alediva
Check Rcyi�,ter
June 30. 200-1
heck
I
11�'.LA
l� RN l,R
E
J' DATE
.'..
, .� NZ,-
<,�4=_e;<
�,llll�]CC
�L1011lll
VtTI^ -R V'cN D,._ NAME...
..
""_. _.
_ _�
7 CELL S....-S .•_
I^.MICE TCTA_
?B96 EAR"""- CRPSFA:RWEAW
_
590.J9
19,0 FASTS'DE J�6="" 5'P�'_^^MLA=
Oo .-- = ,.,`�
-1PIGI'CE TOTAL
S4
001 C00
RP -Di'- .ICCESS 2EE
-
4 '_3
4640 ENA CCCRIERS INC
20`I,I4 "
6
11F.0.CE TCTA=.
OOG 0 _ 5'9 30
., 4
1SC92 EITVIRCNMENT C�P"ROL
__...
__
___- —1 cv'P_iE5
IWC=CE 107 L
'IA'.',
J5' 74 'CO
02
10_ 000 C]C _42 40 41 2_
4 693-�^
=150 EVERSON ECONO INC.
-. _.,
CATCH BARMS
:NWICE ToTaL
I1400 FORD '.DBELLEb-'E
nF' _.04 0 Zo, OC
o.
29.-
-
DLI -_-_
iNVO.=__ __TAL
FCCSC 401'
'
001 C00 c'z0 _Z_ Z:l 42 in
PC:.=_: A.___
'N'/C=CE T.)T;L
SG--5 SOCIISE L POWER Eu� �. -.� ,.NC
05 14'C! .,=O;CO
-
i0'- '000 000 S-E
IQ= MIN
2292=?
O01 '00O 000 S"S 30 49
EQG=2 MP.=N
TNVCICE TOTAL
229255
00_ OCO C00 576 3O ?- 0::
SUPPL=ES
INVCTCE T.. AL
�8'S GRAINGHR -NC, 'AW
C�_-._1 .,,"iC
03 2b{=I..-_
131 DOC C'U �4z _11 �- �-
__-..-
_�, -�..
9U= P==ES
IVVC :CE='.,.AL
PAGE
_, 4-.E0
75
S05 id
SOS.'.9
15
S .z2
653 4-
_.9.W
Su.S..
Ciri ol'\hcdina
Cluck kc, -, star
Jum2 "0, 200-1
Eck
�h�c
'JFNDGR
`: F DATE
r
NENSER
Slllilt'C7
,i RI OIIRI
NLT19ER VENDOR ^':=
I aS..vG .. _MEO L ✓o'_... .._ -
n ..:SIT
I_E2'EA2
_`VOICE _07AL
_CI OCO OOC 542 30 31 ].:
E?EWEAP. /9 -(:
.,T___P. .WA.
06.14 11 :C'CC -4.5.
_ _ DC') 542 _- -
._
q M_ _/
_ y
R.,NE .4N T._aJ?N..:
L`iYC=CE TOTAL
".. ES
- 0 ._ 9EI o
OCI CGO G-G Sit 20 +2
-
-
6340 HCMEGLAP., o.T=�i_, bE3`J
TOTAL
..,CC/CO 5 .-...,
0 .,�_ OCD 516 '3 'J 31 ..
6345 HORIZC:J
-"
SUPTL:_
IN-lC:CE 7CT,,L
06,=4 -4 1001CO =6C'D0 Al
vol OCD 300 S2 ZC is ;G
-
a4.CD
6S?+ IMPACT SOLUT_CNS
•'_--
S"zs nm DUE
INV`._CE TGT,%L
'
,.40
.18E !SSAQLA{ 7)LI']E DEPT
CG-0 Y
:91 ;--C�G
�- -
00' 0'JO 000 S I :. ..
—�
.00
_SE _. F:R NG RANGE
IDPICICD TCTAL
95_a =
1d95g
210 �9 IRAPE_.0 DOCU MART
J6 _k:=4 __ 77/CO �859
OJ1 p00 OOJ 518 _ :1 .,
.
,.. ELCPES
iN7=E TOTAL
: 428
001 OCC 300 ,_ _1 44 JO
-
- -
'e00 :..] SOUR:rAL N6Wc' oE3S
P': .0 - _
„-.,
_ . _ .., _
EG?., r.D V=PULSING
7N9OICE TOTAL
I;J
2_
00 20
950C KEENL_ S CFM
:NVCICE 'IGTAL
0 ^'J/9C 946 '_C_2575
GO_ OOG C.00 512 '1 __ 5D
. 26
87SO KINKO'S INC
.4. ._
;2PIn3
Iv ✓3:CE TOTAL
'_35or-71991)
CGI 'loci soG 5_a
_PP✓CICE _'CTAL
__350C_-2_29
Col COo COO 512 IC 3_ C0
7GP:ES
IDNO:.CR TC-AL
PAGE
reTRI2hT-
M,2QN"
_oo '29
23.95
23
__-.51
14. ,
44.C_
:o. i
9^.`3
59 �_
9-i'
I,099
74
.74
213.1-
216.4'
It) 7 /12/0 4
cit Ot l'.xi a
ctltck- uza;sr,�r
june 30. 2004
PAGE
.}12c�
iflJl`�
•.rcND OR
- __
_
-
l llllh0i
A111OLII'I
VUN.,ER
_
�:,.ACCOUNT
�.._ COJ CCO
__,_ __o _WC.ICE
- ncr ADO OCO 525 60 41
EMERG
.2.'u..
- ..
98I0 MERCER�.i�wl�� __
/ i..a .'i�
--�.
,-4_42
hARI_E AT:r.:L ITEMS
IINJG=CE _.,_.AL
6'4.4`
r i0'
Poo- nA 24'04 001 ODD OOC 513 17 42 70
-._:
-
?43
:0395 SEX'":. CCMMLSICG23S
41:a i
00S
-o
SELI-VoW.R PHONEY
A2R25-AY24':4 CID 000 000 =58 is 4- -o
Sa-4
CFLL-'L[.R P.,NW
APR25-PV+'I-404 0DT 20C 000 576 gg _2 70
_aE. y-
__[,:.T=AR PEONES
APR25 Wi21-04 001 000 000 521 _1 .2 70
451 4-
_,I'JOYCE ..,_nL
___40'
^ _� CC1 p20 or 553
540.70
:539
_'n_00
10443 11W ARRCR'ISTAE/T NA "SHEN
�o�-4:J4 .27
-
-
S
t.RdCP o_ SERVICES
INVGICE TCT_.:
_4c 33
RAY 341A 001 J00 Co] 558 on ,_ _,
..2_,_
.FSGR'_5"' 'S:R`7=.:.mac
INVOIrg TCTi,L
;-I
CO 000 ill,___ __ +_ _.
434. 42
42
1C1GO 0'P3 C_N § ASS.._.�+_FS -:IC
.� C^ i. . 0A Z
_-245
:.FJ.,
4G4.
..
p�CSED
_.:.DICE T__..L
494.4_
10550 OFFT('R SEFCT CRELIC PLAT.
E=, 04 C �0/JO
-
`^ OG' C00 000 S__ '0 ,. 7C
"_
... i.5I
196 '
,339 .71
DIOR CEAIP
MAY-1- 001 000 000 521 21 __ _
--' -
s w D:....:.::
NAY'J'. ^01 O00 COC 52_ ;I
MAY' 4 3.,_ -00 C00 51d _0 '1 JO
_, _..._
SUPPL:Es
!NVMCZ _CTAL
_,___ _
i C4 C J:00
APR24 MA 4A 101 700 'Cr :-B GC 4- .-
,,2E4.-4
1560;.
- 288-P
10'00 OTAK
2LP.NN LNG ..Oh Sti i'"Aid'"
.`,/DICE TOTAL
., 254.94
A1._.
AP2-4-M20W00130 C
033.._
LAP72.S�APR ='2NSE:,TASIT
14110. CE ""DYNE
', 03 i.:.3
/04
Citti of \L2Cfina
Clock Ra�istcr
Junc 0. 200=4
l fI;:C�
i-t1CCi
IENDCR
-
_
�1111➢CCI
\[i1011lll
917Y5ER
7ELN'=ME
-"_-
Dci 000 0o-
1
:GET SCND FNZRT.
oc ,,._ J c
_LECT.-_:T-'
:VJCICE TC-..:.
MAZ :41
00: 03J 000 574 80
- cc
IIPJCICE T-'T{',
M,A3'�4C
'?'.i_ AGO
1:.6C7
SANI-AR-f & XA:N NrN^E =UPPLf
jg 'Co
.... ,73
453..,
a ._
-J-
IH^.GICE TCT=.L
`3/"1
9c 700 D00 _8
12.,O
Ea HIRE, iN.^
SEA.
_
_Or
_-. .1E
22.7-7�ON_..o
-..7..-_2E _ITAL
,..1d
i3400
LOCK -
SECIR':v SAFE "•`_
° - '7J 'GC
- .
- .
S� cam- ccJ 2_
of Fr _ S
_�_AL
288
18135
TcCHN '.�=: SL-?r-T SE3'rICEc
Jai 14,44 11 C40
01i i5
00, 020 Vu 5._ 20
48 C
,,;
REPA:R PRINTER
-;P/CI.'.E TC.r.L
16_E6
WA IT .)E?T OF
06 14C4 05'_:.40
MACS"_.
001 T00 300 8 __
_: �.,
_3
_v.JSE
._ DCD 7J L_ __
23 IC
"A4CHItiE �.-34
-NVCI:E TOTAL
. o
.,
_:50
WASH:NGTOA AWARDS _a
NAME PLATE
i o-CE 73TAL
O
_�100
PETTY CASH
0i �30/0C
1,j1p ...
cc JOJ JJ0 I:3 11
-�
_-
REPLELCSH
^_TTY
LASH
I,IN
10'_ 000 300 518 :3
4< .3
REFS I:SH
PETTY
ASH
3L-N'GI
0CI J00 30^ =.._ _G
42 C3
REPLENI Sri
PETTY
CASH
_EPLF'7!SH
Pc...TY
_P.SH
:-_-NI II
c0- J20 -OC. 5,3= =..
41 72
REPLE RSH
PETTY
'ASH
imp: 1
301 00'., 20C 3 43
43 ._
REMAUSH
PETTYSASS
A-;E
48J. Sc
430.Q,
465
23E-3Z
291
57.3c
fl�Ci.
��llID�C2
961_
Cite of Mcdina
Chcch RaLlister
June 30. 2004
VENDOR
`.AL
r�1A��lllll
NCMuZR VE ].. v SAME
d. _._.-
12138 M6�NA �.,�`�ENT�RY 5-5':^v1
OF•'-'
4 - - r.0 �nM R. 7_AL
001 OOC OCR ___ ..1 41 ...
- oa .00
� =RS NEE=NG
:20GICE 2C7AL
--- >
23::5 _ONNER BROTHERS NSTRLC_ICIQ _
:;G _.. _4
:.+ "l RE1 C_. : _9
101 OCC 001 542 43 +_ .-
?=AMME
1 N7GI CE TOT?.�
C6
=0 2 22
_.._ 000 JCC 542 _O
_'.
" CC
'_31'_ ASP'..'JNDH
_. ,,
,PEP: _H:MMING
15
2203 RU MENTHAL UN:FCPMS n E., 2M=N
'. ,__,:_
A :r _„ 1443
C1 :CD CCO 52r 1= ..= U
_61
_CL:CE KNOT_
_.n1O:CE TOTAL
_:
l4 D.
301 000 000 52: 23 32 00
IS I' 'AdVRON IPOLICE ,�
u5'.,
PCL LCE-ALTGMGBI LEO
_N'✓GI_= 70TAL
C'-IEV4CN ;PW S'"REETS'
-._
'�n/r0 F9230E40�"r6
:Oi J00 �. ST5 30 .. ,:
MELINn �._EE_
vEPT
_L
I VAOICE OCTAL
_i5.14
3325 CRYSTAL SPRINGS
96/21,
:4 �.., GO/SJ 34'L490-_�
70: 000 000 5-_ SD _. 00
WATER
INVOICE TC7AL
94`2111-15
Do: C00 J00 512 11 3: OC
WATER
251251' 15
C_ 000 COC 52_ Z. _I ]0
WATER
=:1'iCICE TOTAL
595_113
iB092 ENVIRONMENT CGVTROL
16,:1.04
..,:0 _, 45303
�._ 000 000 S S 30 43 'I
3::LC
IN`JGICE m.._AL
_..02
L40O FORD OF BELLE9UE
0612_,
_: 00/OC'00 EOW269845
'01 43 00
ODD GCO 5.1 ==
NA.:NT'Ni,NCE
C4 Z :0;03 14SUP17
in C00 300 :12 _o 31 OC
331.08
5500 H L FCWLER COMPANY
OV 2'
SU?PLIES
IN40fjE TOTAL.
so
s�s r.IL:,.s -�FZR MnRc'N �
z .V Clec 4Z_28
0:01 000 0 �1: Z_ 4'_ - �0
HIS CR_CA• 2ERMI7 ORD
Ciri of \[�dina
Check Ka��istar
June 30. 2004
i1dC�
l iNc'l�.
VDNDCR
_
�.UN1�tiI
ailif_vLPIt
NLMBER
07 _ 0. '0 �,'C l J33 0 _ CGO ODL 52- 20
_
IIo_ -�
82'.: KC =INAVGE JA_- _R J_;IES
-.-
-"
M_op_h _ANCR ..: _K V.:
: VVGI= 'CTP.C.
830 r� __ .. �. .ABC"
OF -4
:J_..R AL AGREEME ST
_
p rim„ M4 N.:J 70 `'G9 )15 S12
I362'o
_, P_i.-00
t3525 R_RKL�SIE MU9I': �P _. .c.
-
`?ARATTICN
_E:, F.:NE
---a
40
1E1:9 Nc T`^O"I097 :V: RE_E=S .NC
CE/----° .S -� ° - 0,_ CCO OJ _�_ ._.. _..
ANNUAL M,INTENA-NCZ
-
1046C C'BRIEN s ASSCC.e Ea :NC.,
R.S „5i 21; r„'I'`.',] �5:4 C01 000 0 - SO -._ __
o".23
RRwECJT =% A_:CRN EY
_.,.AL
76,-:' 0{J0!'%0 U =TS ., _ :00 OOu `2i 20 n_ ._
-,a53C
`--.c_31
:6025 CBERMTt..^cR _n✓IIJ M
t
i`]VCL-E TC?AL
'
'-
od6-10
10757 GLYMPliS ?RESB
° '- -
�KE3GeN �' =2 Eo AR cD'vESS
INVC=CE T..:r-L
'b 84
.��10 PACIFIC J: "� _ r��.,MA7 __j
..., -. ,_ �, '.DI Gu ,__ JO D00 �� a,. d JO
_
..SI07 -OP-ER LEAS_
:N`."iCE. ?CTAL
�11 OOG OCO 7-6 4? 7G
:IP-ER :,AEE
:_.+.,__E -C7AL
53
PITNE'1 9CWES INC-SJP-'�ES
F __. _- J0/�0 2090 018 _0 48 u.
...
.12-0
..SAx METER
^-01 J00 UJi, _:z I.,
:..J30.00
427 PR'CE ,.CHN ::.
2_. .. II. _� _
"BL: LEFENCEF.
I=AL
7241'
:P-
"N
6-''4 01 C09
_-REE= LI3i=
' r J 2!
679
„525.'IJ
32...,
.25 u
bd .
68
546-=_
z i i I_
33' 5
0.5.;
-31
h 7/1 )�
Cit" of Nk dilla
Check K�Ristcr
Jung 30, 2004
?A3E _,
1ldC�;
Li1CCt.
VEN:CR
F
7G_
.-.CC='N N-".v!9ED
PI
rOU'P
u
"` i1011I1t
NUMcER +EwDGP NAME
-- "" 4E_
,�:CL
\ll]Il�fOI
'
:2FIOICE TOM:,
_, ...
OE 2 _ 9 23 :=
.M1
'
7-_ GOO 20c 519 __ -_
.,:.:4
_,ro-.94
L320 :WEST
___EPHO ES
INVCICE T:.: A..
:.
N04c
Ci
E
:. 2HCNE
_yiV I CE T07AL`'-
CLa':4U
0O1 000 000 513 :: 4- ._
___. :SDN
_Nb'._CE -,TAL
___ _ EH
INb'CI:E '_. --A:.
:.3-
-- -
12025 BADIO SHACK CORP09ATION
C3AN'HERS
_- �-
J DfUC
r v
:+ 'J
30_ 000 0 524
O1--.47
'_2005 RO'P_-[ MILL ENG:NESR D1C PA4TNEBS
9E�21;74
CCN
S[.L7AN'"
000 000 E-0 80
ENc II:EERI%H _CNE!::.TAN"
'YAL
SOS DATA
4 b�
-
043 17
:NVOICE . „_.A_.
_.442
OOi _oo D00 �13 is 19 :_
16..14
NEWSSS7"EP
E*r'VC_=: _c-A
sV 04
_646o
001 300 000 513 : 49 Su
NE'ASL.ETTM
:NJO'_CB 0TAL
345.16
SC
9-93-,e 3
'_03 �OC '.0 521 5O 6, s_
_ b" 9)
.,
,'.30
13592 TASER _NT'�
_ __ ..4 �C'00;
--
-' -
7WO : SERS
INVOICE ":'GT-AL
o -.. .,
34.68
�
:3933 7C:]-dED CAfiE'_ER NE -WORKS{."'
'�0/2
J6; 2'i4 _. -
E2'E4�k
.Oi J00 000 _c. __ 42 .. ..
;.4. _0
9ti4:
'bT:O:('E IOTA:.
:4. 53
: tAd&
lsEl=R
".I LLil �lcC
:�Il1��lllll
VUMAe1R
'JENEOP
4A➢iE
.,_--.__
..,..
520Z
613
'0-cS
!t-5C
WP.SHINGCON
AWAR7S, INC
_qEz-
�_, __c. 53
_25C1
ECHREACH,
S PC -PERT
19045
:3,.E6,
IG5CO
WINE'S :.S.,
K:RK R.
0646
0,349.Ti 725 .AISTIN, WMA M.
_o..Z 4000 EMPLOYMENT SE:�'-7E:7! ::E'T
Cite of \Icdina
Chcck Registcr
June 30. 200-1
_E _Tr
_.. -- E 02
I p:0::E NC.
1,Ii NUMGEP
000 542 30 _-- JO
INVCIC_ ___.A_
0C :: so
90C On _In -0 32 ]C
N AEE P,TE
IWCIC2 TO"'2.L
�LN'04
901 000 CCC n2l cs 41 _2
3CI;JiNi :HYPE,"'OF
i MVC=CETOTAL
:6/29/14 I_
20-,4 WSSMA
O0- 000 000 515 20 41 _0
_„=FEPE9CE
:NVOICE TCTAI
„'-I2704
COL C00 OCO
:7Y A__CFNEY
:N✓C L_E -CTA_
=CN'J4
OOI C0C C00 524 oG it 02
M=D.SG :NSPECTGP
_PPP✓CICE 73TAL
C5,301 :- 0 C..:?
2NC Q VC4
001 In OOC 5_3 :s .._ n
'1TRZf AXES
InR.CICE TCTAL
SPIN'- '=C_n:.
PAGE iI
7 i3TF: PUP N
".MC=
29.
29
_,Z3G. �1
-_,235-5_
23.._0
5:9. 11
_5,1) 7'J
103. 7
r, 49.34
449 3+
.� 410 _'03
Jh '/ 1 ?/()4
ITEM F - 4
y of M6p
v` �v CITY OF MEDINA
City Manager's Office
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
v4vvw.medina-wa._qov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 6, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager
RE: Cable TV Franchise Consultant Agreement
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize City Manager to enter into Agreement with River Oaks
Communications Corporation to provide consulting services to assist tl-e City of Medina in the cable
television franchise renewal process.
POLICY IMPLICATION: The City Council has previously authorized an Interlocal Agreement
between the City of Newcastle, Town of Yarrow Point, Town of Hunts Point, Town of Beaux Arts Village,
City of Clyde Hill and the City of Medina for cable television consulting services. The Interlocal Agreement
allows the participating cities and towns to share the cost of the consulting services. The estimated
maximum cost to the City of Medina is $6,200.
BACKGROUND: The attached agreement is the standard professional services agreement
used by River Oaks. The Scope of Work, Exhibit "'A" of the agreement outlines the specific services to be
provided by River Oaks, which were suggested by the administrators/managers or mayors from the
participating cities and towns during a meeting with the consultant.
Draft 6/02/04
r
THIS AGREEMENT TO FURNISH CONSULTING SERVICES ("Agreement") is made and
entered into as of the day of June, 2004, by and between (collectively
the " ") and RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Colorado
corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, the desires to engage the Consultant to render the consulting
services described in this Agreement and Consultant is qualified and willing to perform such
services in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, sufficient legal authority and sufficient funds exist and are available for the
work to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement and other necessary approvals have been
obtained.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained
herein, and intending to be legally bound, the parties agree as follows:
1. The Project. The Project ("Project") for which the Consultant has been retained is to assist
the in the cable television franchise renewal process.
2. Consultant's Services. The Consultant shall provide the cable television consulting
services described in the attached Exhibit "A" ("Scope of Work").
3. Additional Services. When authorized by the _ , the Consultant agrees to
furnish additional services ("Additional Services") in connection with the Project due to changes in
the scope of the Project or the 's desire for additional or different work to be perfomed
by Consultant. Consultant shall receive compensation for such Additional Services as is provided
for in the attached Exhibit "A".
4. Consultant's Fees. The compensation for the Consultant's services hereunder shall be as
set forth in the attached Exhibit "A". The Consultant shall submit invoices to the for
services rendered and costs incurred on a monthly basis for the preceding month, such invoices to
be in such form and detail as shall reasonably be required by the The
agrees to pay the Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of a properly documented invoice_
5. Commencement And Completion of Services. the Consultant understands and agrees
that time is an essential requirement of this Agreement. The Services shall be completed as soon as
good practice and due diligence will permit The Consultant agrees to begin providing the services
as soon as practicable after this contract is fully executed.
6. Termination.
6.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days prior
written notice to the other party.
6.2 in the event of termination as provided in this Section, the shall pay the
Consultant in full for services performed and costs incurred to the date of notice of termination,
plus any services and costs the deems necessary during the notice period.
7. Insurance.
7.1 (A) Consultant agrees to procure and maintain during the entire term of this
Agreement, at its own cost, a policy or policies of insurance sufficient to insure against all liability,
claims, demands and other obligations assumed by Consultant for the Services provided subject to
the express provisions and limitations set forth in this Agreement. Such insurance shall be in
addition to any other insurance requirements imposed by law.
(B) Professional Business Liability insurance with minimum combined single
limits of S1,000,000 shall be procured.
7.2 Any insurance carried by the
by or provided through any insurance pool of the
insurance to that provided by Consultant.
its officers, or its employees, or carried
, shall be excess and not contributory
7.3 Notwithstanding any other portion of this Agreement, failure on the part of the
Consultant to procure or maintain policies providing the required coverages shall constitute a
breach of this Agreement for which the may, after giving Consultant thirty (30) days
prior written notice, procure or renew any such policy and r;.iay pay any and all premiums in
connection therewith, and all monies so paid by the shall be repaid by Consultant to
the upon demand, or the may offset the cost of the premiums against any
monies due to Consultant from the
8. Subcontractors. Consultant may use or employ those subcontractors specified in Exhibit
"A" in connection with its performance under this Agreement. If Consultant desires to use other
subcontractors in connection with this Project, it shall first obtain the written consent of the
which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
9. Compliance NVith Laws. Consultant agrees that, in the performance of its Services under
this Agreement, it shall comply fully with any and all federal. state and local laws and regulations
now in effect, hereafter enacted or otherwise becoming effective during the term of this Agreement
which are applicable to Consultant and its employees. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, Consultant shall not discriminate against any person necause of race, sex, disability, age,
creed, color, religion or national origin in connection with its performance of this Agreement, and
shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and all applicable regulations and riles
promulgated thereunder by any regulatory agency.
10. Prohibited Interest. No official or employee of the _ shall have any interest,
direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof.
11. Books and Records. The Consultant's books and records with respect to the Services and
reimbursable costs shall be kept in accordance with recognized a:counting principles and practices,
consistently applied, and will be made available for the 's inspection at all reasonable
times at the places where the same may be kept.
12. Ownership Of Documents; Reuse. All documents relating to the Services shall be the
joint property of the and Consultant. Upon completion of the Services, or at such
other time as the may require, the Consultant shall deliver to the a
complete set of such documents and such additional copies thereof as the _ may
reasonably request. All documents prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are
instruments of service in respect of the Project. Any reuse without written verification or without
adaptation by Consultant for the specific purpose intended will be at the 's sole risk and
without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant; and the shall indemnify and hold
harmless Consultant from all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees and
costs arising out of or resulting from the 's use of Consultant's work product pursuant to
this paragraph.
13. Standard of Care. The Consultant shall exercise it[ its performance of the Services
hereunder the standard of care required for Consultant's services. The Consultant shall be liable to
the for any loss, damage or costs incurred by the _ as a result of any failure
of the Consultant to comply with this standard.
14. Indemnification. Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the , its
officers, and employees, from and against all liability, darns and demands on account of injury,
loss or damage, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with this Agreement if such
injury, loss or damage is caused in whole or in part by the negligence of Consultant, or any officer,
employee, representative, or agent of the Consultant, except to the extent such liability, claim or
demand arises through the negligence of the its officers, employees or agents.
15. 'notices. Any notices required or permitted hcrcunder shall be sufficient if sent by overnight
delivery or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
If to the
If to the Consultant: River Oaks Communications Corporation
6860 South Yosemite Court, Suite 2000
Centennial, CO 80112
Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Wiled notices shall be effective five
business days after mailing.
16. Information Prepared by Others. During the course of the Project, the Consultant may
use infornnation which has been prepared by others. The Consultant shall advise the of
any errors or omissions discovered during the use of such information; however, the Consultant
shall not be responsible for discovering any or all errors or omissions in such information, nor for
any damages attributable to defects in the information prepared by others.
17. Attorneys' Fees. If any action is brought in a court of law by either party to this Agreement
concerning the enforcement, interpretation or construction of this Agreement, the prevailing party,
either at trial or upon appeal, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees as well as costs,
including expert wiriness fees, incurred in the prosecution or defense of such action.
18. Applicable Laws. This Agreement, and all questions concerning its execution, validity or
performance shall be interpreted in all respects in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington.
19. Entire Agreement. This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between the
parties hereto regarding the subject matter hereof, and shall supersede all prior discussions and
negotiations, whether written or oral, pertaining to the Project.
20. Modification. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a duly authorized
written instrument executed by the parties hereto.
21. Copies. -this Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two or more copies, each of
which shall be considered an original for all purposes and all of which together shall constitute but
one and the same instrument.
22. Paragraph Headings. Paragraph headings are inserted for convenience only and in no way
limit or define the interpretation to be placed upon this Agrecrneit.
23. Waiver. The failure of either party to exercise any of its rights under this Agreement shall
not be a waiver of those rights. A party waives only those rights specified in writing and signed by
the party waiving its rights.
24. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the
parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assn'jis.
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the
dale first appearing above.
CONSULTANT:
RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION
Rv-
Vice President
BY: --
Title
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF WORK
This Scope of Work will be performed by River Oaks Communications Corporation
("Consultant") as follows:
1. The Consultant will review each of the City's/Town's cable television file materials (as
provided by each City and Town), including the Franchises, transfer resolutions and ordinances,
correspondence and other pertinent documents.
2. The Consultant will develop a list of goals and objectives for the new model cable
television franchise.
3. The Consultant will draft a new cable television franchise which will serve as the
model for each conununity and negotiate with Comcast for specific modifications and additions to
that document as requested by each community.
4. The Consultant will prepare Customer Service Standards for review by the Cities/
Towns and for subsequent submittal to Comcast.
5. The Consultant will draft model cable provisions for inclusion in the City/Town
Codes.
6. The Consultant will hold conference calls and meet with the Cities/Towns and conduct
cable franchise renewal negotiation sessions with Comcast.
7. The Consultant will prepare, edit and revise drafts of the new proposed cable television
franchise.
8. The Consultant will finalize the new model cable television franchise and Customer
Service Standards.
9. The Consultant will provide other cable television consulting services as needed by the
Cities/Towns during the cable franchise renewal process.
it shall be each City's,Town's decision whether to renew or not renew and/or grant or not
grant a new cable television franchise.
Fee Schedule
In consideration of the services to be performed, the CitiesiTowns agree to pay Consultant
on a time and reimbursable cost basis according to the following schedule:
0
River Oaks' hourly billing rates: S195/hour (one-half the hourly rate for travel)
River Oaks' Subcontractors:
- Goverrunent and Community Access — Off -Site Channel, Equipment/Facilities Review:
5100/hour
Reimbursable direct costs:
- Federal Express
- Postage
- Long Distance Telephone Charges
- Clerical
- Faxes
- Copies
- Air, Rental Car, Meals and Lodging
The above Scope of Work and Fee Schedule anticipates the Consultant spending
approximately 175 hours working on this project with an estimated completion date of October 18,
2004. This includes a maximum of three trips on behalf of all of the Cities/Towns to meet with
Comcast for cable franchise negotiations. Expenses are projected to be S4,750.
Any additional work by the Consultant after October 18, 2004 will be based upon the
mutual agreement of the Consultant and the Cities/Towns.
7
Item H-1
MEDINA POLICE DEPAIF;'I'IV�NT
Jeffrey T. Chen, Chief of Police
CITY OF NUMNA
MONTHI,Y ACTIVITY REPORT
JUNE 2004
Felony Crimes
June
YTD
YTD
Year End
2004
2004
2003'
2003
Aggravated Assault
0
0
0
0
Robbery
0
0
0
1
Sexual Assault,'Rape
0
0
1
2
Burglary, Residential
0
4
7
16
Drug Violations
0
3
0
0
ForgerV'Fraud
1
10
8
15
Vehicle Prowl
2
9
2
14
Theft (Over $250)
3
5
3
9
Malicious Mischief
0
0
4
5
Arson
0
0
1
2
AUtO�Boat Theft
3
4
1
2
Possession of Stolen
1
I
2
2
Property
TOTAL
10
36
29
68
Misdemeanor
June
YTD
YTD
Year End
Crimes
2004
2004
2003
2003
Assault. Simple
0
0
1
2
Malicious Mischief
1
16
M
(Under $250)
Vehicle Prowl
0
6
9
26
Theft (Under S2�0)
1
7
11
Domestic Violence
0
1
0
s
Minor in Possession
0
4
_
6
Drug Violations
I
TOTAL
3
25
36
81
Pa ,c 2
Item H-1
MEDINA POLICE DEPAETMENT
Jeffrey T Chen, Chief of Police
CITY OF MIDINA
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
JUNE 2004
Accidents
June 2004
YTD 2004
YTD 2003
Year End 2003
Injury
0
1
0
1
Non -Injury
0
4
6
16
TOTAL
0
5
6
17
Traffic Citations
June 2004
YTD 2004
YTD 2003
Year End 2003
Drivinn Under Influence
0
50
27
42
*Other
0
97
103
206
TOTAL
0
147
130
248
Traffic Infractions
June 2004
YTD 2004
YTD 2003
Year End 2003
Speeding
44
286
142
406
Parking
9
41
59
184
**Other
43
294
224
532
TOTAL
96
621
425
1122
Traffic Warnings
June 2004
YTD 2004
YTD 2003
Year End 2003
TOTAL
163
1279
1116
2635
Calls for Service
June 2004
YTD 2004
YTD 2003
Year End 2003
1louse Watch Checks
28
285
226
424
Falsc Alarms
40
1 38
182
387
Assists -Citizen
11
105
122
217
Assists-Firc,'Medic
4
43
80
139
Suspicious Circumstances
1
8
6
I S
Property— Found/Lost
3
12
6
18
Animal Complaints
1
1
2
Missing Person
0
0
0
warrant Arrests
2
35
24
68
***Other-
6
,3
60
TOTAL
96
653
680'
1332
* DWLS: Dail to Transfer Title:
No License
** Expired Tabs: No insurance:
Fail to stop:
Defective Fquipment
*** Verbal Domestic: Vandalism;
Civil Dispute: Disturbance
Item H-1
Town of
Hunts Point
MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jeffrey T. Chen, Chief of Police
TOWN OF HUNTS POR',FF
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
JUNE 2004
Felony Crimes
June
Year To Date
Year To Date
Year End
2004
2004
2003
2003
Burglary, Residential
0
3
0
2
Forgery (Identity Theft)
1
I
5
s
Vehicle PCOM
2
3
2
d
Theft (Over S250)
0
0
1
3
Auto/Boat Theft
0
0
2
2
TOTAL
3
7
10
16
Misdemeanor
June
Year To Date
Crimes
2004
2004
Assault. Simple
0
0
Malicious Mischief
3
3
(Under S25O)
Vehicle Prowl
0
1
Theft (Under S2�O)
0
1
Domestic Violence
0
0
Minor in Possession
0
1
Drub Violations
0
1
TOTAL
3
7
Year To Date Year End
2003 2003
0 0
0 2
2
0 2
O 0
0 0
1 1
3 7
Page 2 Item H-1
MEDINA POLICE DEPAIF:TMENT
Jeffrey T. Chen, Chief of Police
Town of , TOWN OF HUNTS POINT
Hunts Polio MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
�'✓'� JUNT 2004
Traffic
June
Year To Date
Year To Date
Year End
Citations
2004
2004
2003
2003'
Drivin_ Under Influence
0
5
2
5
Accidents
0
0
0
0
*Other
3
32
24
67
TOTAL '
3
37
26
72=
Traffic
June
Year To Date
Year To Date
Year End
Infractions'
2004
2004
2003
2003
Speeding
5
19
41
68
Parking
?
4
3
7
**Other
56
152
95
206
TOTAL
63
175
139
281
Warnings
June
Year to Date
Year to Date
Year End
2004
2004
2003'
2003
TOTAL
26
292
314
634
Other Calls
June
Year To Date
Year To Date
Year End
for Service
2004
2004
2003
2003
I louse Watch Checks
1
16
12
28
False Alarms
4
37
39
91
Assists-Citizcn
2
12
11
27
Assists-FireMedic
2
7
10
19
Suspicious Circumstances
I
?
3
Property Lost Found
0
0
1
3
Animal Complaints
0
0
0
0
Warrant Arrests
I
7
4
20
***Other
0
6
?
10
TOTAL
11
87
85
201
* DWI -Si Fail to Transfer Title, No License
** Expired Tabs; No insurance: Fail to stop: Defective Equipment
*** Verbal Domestic: Harassment; Civil Dispute: Arson
ITEM H - 2
CITY OF MEDINA
Development Services
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 93039 425.454.9222
_. ed i na-wa.gov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 7, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Joseph Gellings, AICP, Planning Director
RE: Monthly Development Services Department Report
Planning Commission Meeting Recap — There were three items or the agenda for the July 6, 2004
Planning Commission meeting. Per the staff recommendation the commission approved a construction
mitigation plan for the Josefberg residence — a new home proposed for 402 Upland Road. The
commission next discussed Side Yard Setbacks/ Reconstruction Threshold. Alternative definitions for the
reconstruction threshold were reviewed. The commission resolved to request that staff evaluate these
new definitions against more case studies. Finally, the commission reviewed the Site Plan Review
ordinance and staff's recent amendments aimed at improving its legal defensibility. The commission
resolved to postpone action on the ordinance due to Chair Lostrom's absence.
ITEM H-3
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 6, 2004
THRU: City Manager
TO: City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works
RE: Public Works Activity Report
1. Attached is the Public Works Activity Report for tl-e period 1 — 30 June 2004.
2. The intent of this report is to provide the City Manager and City Council with a
narrative description of the primary activities occurring within the Public Works
Department over the included period.
ITEM H-3
CITY OF MEDINA
501 Evergreen Point Road • P.O. Box 144 . Medina, WA 98039-0144
Telephone 425-454-9222 • Fax 425-454-8,190 • Police 425-454-1332
MEDINA PUBLIC WORKS
ACTIVITY REPORT
(1 — 30 June 2004)
This report describes the activities of the City of Medina Public Works (PW) Department
for the period shown.
1. Routine Public Works Maintenance — The Public Works Crew (PWC) continues to
work on maintaining and improving our parks, streets, storm drains, street planter strips,
right-of-way plantings, sidewalks and buildings. The spring weather conditions with lots
of warm sunny days coupled with periods of rain resulted in significant early vegetation
growth all over the City. The favorable growing weather rotably increased the rights -of -
way boons mowing, power and hand mowing requirements in both the Parks and along
the rights -of -way, as well as the amount of weeding (never ending). As previously
reported, the PWC continues to be challenged with keeping up with all of the
requirements due to the continuing injury problem with one of the 4 full-time employees.
2. Public Works :Maintenance and Repair Projects, Special Activities —
a. Work in and around City Hall - Placed new concrete encased sleeves and
permit parking signs in permit parking areas, pressure washed the lower half of the City
Hall building to include under the deck area, cleaned the window screens, and ordered a
new lock and door catch for the men's restroom (old one could not be repaired).
b. Seven signage repairs and/or replacements around the City.
c. Post wind storm clean-up on Overlake Drive East and West.
d. Removed an old stump and invasi%c plants at the interface of Indian Trail and
7620 NF 24`" St.
e. Trimmed the deadwood out of the old maples on NE 7°i St. and 86"' Ave NE.
f. PWC placed and removed 13 postings and retrieved five records from the
City's records storage facility during the month.
g. Contacted se% era] agencies and finally determined a disposal option for
diseased trees.
ITEM H-3
h. Cleaned out the invasive plants around the priniary storm drain stream running
from the Golf Course under NE 24"' St. and onto the Well Medina Nursery property.
i. Removed old hanging coaxial cable from several poles around the City.
3. Park Projects / Issues — Until the Park Board decides on how to meet the City
ConnCiFs requirement to provide the Council with a quarterly written report on Parks and
Preserve related activities and projects, this section of the Public Works Activity report
will be reinstitute to capture Park and Preserve related work and activities by the PWC.
a. Medina Beach Park:
(1) Limbed up the young birch trees (kids starting to do damage).
(2) Removed the old pipe mounted lifeguard sign and replaced it with a
new sign on new wooden uprights.
(3) Poured a new concrete pad for the lifeguard stand.
(4) Cleaned up after five post -school partics.
(5) Added new sand to the small children's beach.
(6) Placed new thermal plastic "No Diving" signs on the jetty and on the
floating raft/dock.
(7) Fabricated and placed a new "Lake Swimming Lesson" sign.
(8) Supported the Police Department durin the interview process for the
summer lifeguards.
b. Medina Park:
(1) Cleaned up around the Windsong scul}v:ure.
(2) Cut down two dead trees and disposed of the wood.
(3) Activated the irrigation system on the western side, checked and
adjusted sprinkler heads, and repaired a system leak.
(4) Installed a drip irrigation system around the Medina Park restroom
building planting beds.
(5) Removed a significant amount of invasive plants around the two Park
ponds.
(6) Set-up electrical poe\ er and provided clean up activities in support of
two after -school parties held in the Park.
ITEM H-3
c. Fairweather Park and Nature Preserve:
( I ) Pressure washed the concrete practice court.
(2) Reinforced the backing and painted the backboard for the practice
court.
(3) Removed and disposed of the old rotten creosote logs from the
parking lot (will bring in new gravel and parking bumpers).
d. Lake Lane Dock: Cleaned up the debris along t' e path leading down to the
dock.
e. Indian Trail: Continued work on cutting and removing the sod, placing fabric
and gravel for the new Indian Trail pathway.
4. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Projects —
a. Tennis Courts Refurbishment Project: The project is 85% complete. Two of
the three courts are currently playable and the third will be playable shortly. The mid and
lower fence rails for the Medina Park court have been back -ordered as well as the
backdrop screens. New benches and garbage cans will also be placed.
b. Medina Beach Park Bulkhead and Dock Repair Project: The project is
progressing fairly well although we are currently trying to sort through off -shore
underwater property rights with the State of Washington Department of Natural
Resources. The regulatory and resource agencies have also proposed an alternative
design option which is currently being investigated and cost estimated. If feasible, the
new proposal will be submitted to the Park Board for review and to the City Council for
review and approval.
c. NE 12' h St. and Lake Washington Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation Project:
The project start has been delayed slightly while Clyde Hit works through a change order
and a Bellevue Utilities water line replacement project on NE 20`r' St. A project
completion date before the start of the school yeas- is still projected.
d. Fairweather Park and Nature Preserve Stream Rehabilitation Project: The
project has been designed and the JARPA permit applications are being submitted to US
Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife for
approval. EarthCorps will accomplish the work once the permits are issued.
e. Per approval of the 2005-2010 CIP, initial design work has started on the
Ridge Road! NE 6'' Street overlay project scheduled for 2005. Additionally, scope and
cost estimates are being prepared by an A!E firm to start the concept investigation of the
overlay / stomp drain upgrade ' pedestrian pathway project -or the north end of Everurcen
Point Road, a CIP project scheduled for 2007.
ITEM H-3
5. Committee and Seminar/N%orkshop and Training Attendance —
a. The DPW attended a Technical Committee meeting for the SR 520 Bridge
Replacement and HOV Project on June 9"'.
b. The DPW attended a special meeting on June 30°i with the WSDOT SR 520
Management Team to learn more about the proposed maintenance facility under the
eastern high-rise bridge abutment.
6. Other —
a. The PWC continues to work the PSE vegetation management project. A
detailed spreadsheet which identifies what work has been clone and what still needs to be
done has been created, and meetings and coordination with residents continues. A draft
of a best management practices info sheet for care of the PSE shrubs and trees has been
drafted.
b. The DPW has asked Terra Associates, Inc. (Geotechnical Engineering
Consultants) to obtain an additional set of inclinometer readings from the three test
borings on Overlake Drive East. The purpose is to determine if there has been any
appreciable road surface and subgrade movement associated with the adjacent Flemming
development project at 446 Overlake Drive East.
c. The DPW is working with Boy Scout John Montgomery of Evergreen Point
Road to investigate a potential Eagle Scout project in Fairweather Park and Nature
Preserve.
d. The PW Shop storm drain system upgrade with oil -water separator design
(required to meet environmental laws) is being reviewed. 11'approved, the project will be
submitted for bids from construction companies on the Small Works Roster (consolidated
City of Lynwvood roster).
ITEM I - 1
�liy ai +i1 ��f�9
CITY OF MEDINA
City Manager's Office
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
www.medina-wa.gov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 6, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager
RE: Medina Park Dog Rules Proposal
RECOMMENDATION: Consider Park Board recommendation for amendments to MMC 12.24
POLICY IMPLICATION: The Park Board has recommended modification of rules for dogs in
Medina Park, which have been reduced to writing in the attached draft ordinance.
BACKGROUND: See attachments.
Medina Municipal Code
Chapter 12.20
Chapter 12.2-i
TREES IN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-%N AY PUBLIC PARKS
Repealed by Ord. 743 i Sections:
1,.2-1.010 Rules applyingto all public parks.
11 2-1.020 Rules applying to Medina Beach Park.
1 2`.2 1.03() A iolation — PenaltN.
12.2-1.010 Rules applying to all public parks.
The following rules shall appl.. and be enforced
in all public parks:
A. No alcoholic beverages shall be allowed.
B. There shall be no loitering in or ahout the
vicinity of bathhouses or restroom facilities.
C. There shall be no overnight camping.
D. No fireworks shall be allowed except for
licen::ed displays.
E. No firearms. airguns or weapons shall be dis-
played or used. except when displayed or used be
duly authorized law enforcement officers in the
performance of their duties.
F. No privately owned motor -powered vehicles
shall be allowed in other than designated parkin_
or lording areas.
G. No motor boats shall operate upon watcP.
within 300 feet of the shore of a park facilin at a
speec in excess of seven knots. or approach within
50 feet of a roped off swimming, area. except in
case of an cmer-enev: providedk that motor boats
may approach city docks at a slow rate of speed for
the purpose of picking up or dropping off passen-
gers only. No boats that cannot be hand -carried to
the water shall be launched from any Medina park.
H. No pets shall be allowed that are not under
the restraint of a leash. tether or chain in length no
greater than eight feet. or within feet of its owner
or a competent person authorized by the owner, to
the commands of whom it responds promptly; no
pets shall be allowed which are annoying bystand-
ers or other animals or causing physical damage.
1. N'o fires shall he allowed in other than
approved cooking containers or in designated
areas.
1. Park sites shall be closed between 10:00 p.m.
and 6 00 a.m.
K. No animals other than domesticated pets
comp ding with subsection (H) of this section shall
be allo,,ved.
L. All dog feces shall he picked up by the owner
or handier and removed from the public park
and/or adjacent private propetts.
M. Ao nontennis activities shall be allowed on
a tennis court.
12-15 tRc%ised >/04r
i 124.020
N No loud music or vulgar language shall be
allowed.
0. No littering of an% type, including, throwing,
away of cigarette butts, shall be allowed. (Ord. 56
1993: Ord. 515 ti 1. 1990: Ord. 489 i.
I989: Ord. 488 § 1. 1989)
12.24.020 Rules applying to Medina Beach
Park.
The following rules shall apple and be enforced
Lit Medina Beach Park:
A. Swimmers must remain within the outer
float lines.
B. All inner tubes and other floatine aids must
be kept within a designated area.
C. Swimming under docks or rafts is not per-
mitted.
D. Life guard equipment is for official use only.
E. Sitting on float lines is not permitted.
F. Children under eight years of age must be
accompanied by an adult.
G. No dogs shall be allowed. (Ord. 488 ss I
1989)
12.24.030 Violation — Penalt%.
Violation of the public park or Medina Beach
Park rules shall constitute a violation and may be
punished by a fine not to exceed S500.00. (Ord.
488 § 3, 1989)
Chapter 12.26
PARK PRESERVATION PROGRAM
se: bons
1 6.O10 hctahhshed.
12.20,020 'Additional actions authorized.
12.26.010 Established.
All lands and facilities held no A or in the future
by the cit% of Medina for park and recreation pur-
poses. Mlether designated as park. lane, street end
or nature preserve, shall be preserved for such use:
and no such land or facility shall be sold. trans-
ferred or chanted from park use to another usage,
unless the cite shall first hold a public hearin_
re_-ardin_ the necessity of such a transaction and
then enact an ordinance finding that the transaction
is necessary because there is no reasonable and
practical alternative and the city shall, at the same
time or before. receive in exchange land or a facil-
ity of equivalent or better size. value, location and
usefulness in the yicinirN. serving the same com-
munit_v and th- same park purposes (Ord. 1 i.
2001 1
12.26.020 Additional actions authorized.
MMC 12.3).010 permits. b% duly enacted ordi-
nance after a public hearing: a boundary adjust-
ment of equivalents with an adjoining owner.
MMC 12.216.010 also permits, by duly enacted
ordinance after a public hearing and without pro-
\ idin'L replacement propcn\ . a transfer to the fed-
eral. state or county governments for park and
recreation uses. the opening of an unimproved
street for street use; a subsurface or utility ease-
ment compatible s+pith park use: and franchise, of
concessions tf.at further the public use and enjoy-
ment of a park. lOrd. 721 § 12001 )
IRe%ised 3/041 12-16
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO,.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER SECTION 12.24.010 AND
12.24.030 AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 12.24.025 RELATING TO PARK
RULES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA DO ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. MMC SECTION 12.24.010 AMENDED.
Medina Municipal Code Section 12.24.010 is amended to read as follows:
12.24.010 Rules applying to all public parks.
The following rules shall apply and be enforced in all public parks:
A. No alcoholic beverages shall be allowed.
B. There shall be no loitering in or about the vicinity of bathhouses or
restroom facilities.
C. There shall be no overnight camping.
D. No fireworks shall be allowed except for licensed displays.
E. No firearms, airguns or weapons shall be displayed or used, except when
displayed or used by duly authorized law enforcement officers in the performance of
their duties.
F. No privately owned motor -powered vehicles shall be allowed in other than
designated parking or loading areas.
G. No motor boats shall operate upon waters within 300 feet of the shore of a
park facility at a speed in excess of seven knots, or approach within 50 feet of a
roped off swimming area, except in case of an emergency; provided, that motor
boats may approach city docks at a slow rate of speed for the purpose of picking up
or dropping off passengers only. No boats that cannot be hand -carried to the water
shall be launched from any Medina park.
H. Except as provided in 12 40 020 (Medina BE!ach Park) and 12.40.025
(Medina Park) no Nq pets shall be allowed that are not under the restraint of a
leash, tether or chain in length no greater than eight feet, or within 35 feet of its
owner or a competent person authorized by the owner, to the commands of whom it
responds promptly; no pets shall be allowed which arE! annoying bystanders or other
animals or causing physical damage.
I. No fires shall be allowed in other than approved cooking containers or in
designated areas.
0Rr).
J. Park sites shall be closed between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
K. No animals other than domesticated pets complying with subsection (H) of
this section shall be allowed.
L. All dog feces shall be picked up by the owner or handler and removed from
the publicpark and/or adjacent private property.
M. No non -tennis activities shall be allowed on a tennis court.
N. No loud music or vulgar language shall be allowed.
O. No littering of any type, including throwing away of cigarette butts, shall be
allowed
SECTION 3. SECTION 12.24.025 ADOPTED.
Medina Municipal Code Section 12.24.025 is adopted to read as follows:
12.24.025 Rules applying to Medina Park regarding pets
The following rules shall apply to and be enforced in Medina Park:
A. The area to the east of the bridged stream and ponds which divide Medina
Park shall be designated an off -leash area for dogs. All dogs in this area of the Park
must be within positive voice control of their owner or handler and must respond
promptly to the commands of the owner or handler.
B. In the area to the west of the bridged stream and ponds which divide
Medina Park, all dogs must be on a leash and are only allowed on established
paths.
SECTION 2. MMC SECTION 12.24.030 AMENDED.
Medina Municipal Code Section 12.24.030 is amended to read as follows:
12.24.030 Violation — Penalty.
Violation of the public park, er Medina Beach Park, or Medina Park rules shall
constitute a violation and may be punished by a fine not to exceed $500.00.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect five days after its publication or the
publication of a summary of its intent and contents.
()Ru.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS DAY OF
2004 AND SIGNED IN AUTHENTICATION OF ITS
PASSAGE THE _ DAY OF
Approved as to form:
Kirk R. Wines, City Attorney
Attest:
Randy Reed, City Clerk
Passed:
Filed:
Published: _
Effective Date:
ORD.
, 2004.
Mary Odermat, Mayor
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Medina, Washington
On , 2004, the City Council of the City of
Medina, Washington, passed Ordinance No. , the main points of which are
summarized by its title as follows, and approved this summary:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER SECTION 12.24.010 AND
12.24.030 AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 12.24.025 RELATING TO PARK
RULES.
The full text of this ordinance will be mailed upon request.
Randy Reed, City Clerk
ORD.
J
ui
�
'
Q
0.
�
C0 0
V
J
a
a
m
Q
0
o.
o
w
CL
e
N
W
_N
O
Z_
V?
NWT/
a
O
IM
W
�
J
LL
Q
Q
U
LL
0
0
06
Q
Z
Q
W'
Q
a
2
w
-j
w
o
Z
W
�'
z
0
w
LU
0
w
LL
W
Z
_
W
_
0
w
W
Lj
a
J
=
a
W
E"
_
o
z
�=
Li
W
LL
o
Q
i-
Q w
= a
M
m
O
Z
�
z
-
W
z
UJ
z�
Lua
O
z
_,
W 2
Z
O�
d0
Q
w �
ci
�a
ww
�z
mV
LU
p
m0
- Z
QQ
Q
w
w o.
v
=
0
G Q
W
w
(n
>w
�a
o
f-
O�
Lr !
oc,o
w (n
CL
Q
Cl)
_0
Q=
mQ
E—
w
O
LL
J Y
Q
w�
Qz
wQ
_
Op
mom'v
'� Q
(n -J
wm
m
I.W
I.
wz
mQ
av
=�
U)o
2
2
2 O
(n_O
'' "J
LLw
C7 �
1.
1--
wQ
o2
ww
°- -'
F-w
0- 1-
OZ,
z Q
-jO
< U.
a
�n
CL
LL
�
o
�
�
Z
W
0
H
o
Z
-
Cl)
�
�-
z
U)
o
W
LL
o
0
°
Cl)w
z
4
w
O
o
W
z
CL
0
W
W
°
Z
Q
H
00.
_
a
m�
~
z
ao
0
a
CL
00
o
a w
z �
�-
w J W _d
m — j
w m a
F- t) CN <
N -� a
w o �- a
z Q Z COCw.� w 5:
o w Cl) o
O z z0 z o z
w a a
w a Ww o z _
O p' 0� v ? W w
J O
a W� o m w a
z w� ° o o a
W a w w Q
aw o� z > ; a
w a o z '� o_0 U
" �w� o a
�Q � 0 a
a
s F -'-' F o z
in v v a >-- z
>- z Oa C='1 O � 0 F
F= w w W w z
c� a w a a a v
w
to V �'
Z
Z = W � `Z
o > `) a
a z =°a.
W
z w W
w_=ate �-
U)a.
U.
0°
O CO -scan
W � CO3 � IW Z
LLB 0 U > 0 i0 ( 0
Q �
t1) 0.U) w ' w
CD Q ' ~Cl) z I.
� Q a
O Q Lu- o ww !W L) w
R 1
z z wz o
w
> o _— a rn
Q Q z a� o
N ° zw w
w z L)z >
z = Y H J= 0 ,a„
O �-- Q ,� a. z WFM LU Q
UJ
> o. � Q> 0
Y Q 0o
Q a o 00N a LU
>
- Q ��
a
Q
LL
o Q Lu
z w
o c�
F- � W Lu
Q I Lu LU z
ce
w Fz- iu
z � Q o c�
O co a w c)
a 0 ui a 2 C.)
LL _ SO'j
F- F--
z Ww zt vc
.._
— F-
F-m �z ocr
U0 z Z�=
O
z p °- z z w �'-
_�
z M C.?
�
�ULUJ
LL
OU zn 3�
Jo 00 �"-
0a xz Zc�
co _ uj
U) QQ J W �=
a> wo avi
I hones J. Bacher 918 SunsetySal, Bcllc� ue, y1 A 95004 Phone (425)45 4-1 _`bS Fas: (125115-1-1 61
July 6, 2004
To Medina Citv Council members
cc: Park and Recreation Commission members
City Mana«er, Director of Public Works, City Attorney, Police Chief
Re: (a) Proposed action on Park Commission recommends' �e
existin4 doL, rules at Medina Park (Ordinance N
(b) T. J. Bacher memo to Medina Parks and Rec
dated May 14. 2004
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide Council m,
on Medina Park dog rules. Emphasis is placed on a simple l_ �� Y
and/or events occurred regarding dogs being exercised at the Y. ' m
fit, f ance
t-
No. 489 was issued 15 years ago`'"
As a former resident of Medina, and now living in West Bellevue, I ha y peen a daily park
user over 30 years. The opportunity to observe liev% the Medina Park is being used by dot*
owners, therefore, is based on thousands of visits to the park with three different dogs.
In addition, I have been actively collecting information on this issue. Personal contact
included several Medina officials, Elementary School administrators, other Municipal Park
personnel, as wells as Park users as part of the petition signature solicitation. 1 also
obtained information on Medina population, household age profile and Elementary School
attendance data. Also, the 1989-1991 surtiev. "The Development of Medina Park" v,-as
scrutinized for applicable information.
This research highlighted the following:
a) The nature and size of the Medina Park has not changed during the last 15 years.
b) The 1989-91 Medina Park Survey conclusions emphasized "leaving the park in the
present state" and 70% of individuals responding to the survey favored `dogs in the
park under- some sort of control (leash or voice con.rol)." Further, 71% of survey
respondents were against installing additional picnic tables.
C) 'Medina population trends have not changed significantly during the past 12 years
(2981 in 1990 to 3010 in 2002). Further, the number of students in the Medina
Elementary School has only increased slightly fron-i 403 during 1999 to 433 during
2003.
It is obvious f-om the above data that the basic conditions relating to the Medina Park has
not markedly changed during the past 10 to 15 years. The type of park usage is about the
same, as is the size of the park, the average age of and nun -her of park visitors and even the
weather pattern is unchanged (who picnics during the rainy season?)
So why change the current dog rule ordinance for the 'Medina Park? The Ordinance No.
489 was based on extensive public input and Council reviews which occurred between
June 12 and 'November 13, 1989. The final Council decision on Medina park dog rules
acknowledged that the majority of Medina residents approved the everyday park use by
dog owners to exercise their dogs. It also crnphasized voice control rule and most
importantly, the requirement to pick up and deposit dog feces. (Refer to Attachment A.)
During the last month's petition drive, I personally discussed dog rules with over 100 park
users. I contacted not only dog owners but others who were visiting the park.
Approximately 90°/� of individuals contacted signed the petition, even though some were
not dog owners_ Comments I received during signature solicitation include:
• "Why change existing park rules'."
• "I pick up my own dog droppings and sometimes a few more if I notice."
• "If you adopt on -leash and area restrictions, you have a divisive arrangement. This
is a poor neighborhood policy."
• "We dog owners are blamed for unsubstantiated problems. Rain and wind, poor
drainage, droppings by ducks, geese and cro%N s and other park users litter may also
cause park damage."
• "There would be no one in the park during winter months, if dog owners are unduly
restricted."
• "Regulations are useless if not enforced. Police presence is lacking."
• "If dog restrictions are too rigid, people will be forced to exercise dogs on
sidewalks or street right-of-ways. Dog enforcemen: would be only more
complicated."
• `How about disabled and senior people? Isn't it dangerous for frail and elderly
people to try to keep dogs on leash?
We recognize that the current park dog rules are sometimes ignored. There always are a
few individuals who will disregard rules, however. we believe that over 90% of dog
owners comply with the park rules. The remaining I0'r' would do so if a more effective
enforcement is adopted. We, the responsible dog, owners, will support such enforcement
actions and if requested, will even assist the Police Department in their efforts.
If the City Council wishes to change the existing Ordinance, we assume the required public
hearings will be held in accordance with the "Open Public :vleetings Act of 1971" (refer to
Attachment B).
It is our sincere view that the current Ordinance No. 489 should be retained.
Respectfully yours,
Thomas J. Bacher
ATTACHMENT A
EXCERPTS
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
cto9
30 Ph1 Ni na El Pm�nt ar - School
001 NE 8th St.
PUBLIC HEARING
Langenba_ch stated at the last meeting the point was made that the
changes in the Park ordinances, leashes required in Medina ar
jrere_not advertised and were adopted without appropriate citizen
Input. Since he wasn't on the Council at that time, he checked
the record to find what had transpired. The origin of this
particular rule dated back to February of this year, where the
Par% Board r ommended the adoption of certain Park regulations
which included the requirement that no pets sl-iaii be allowed that
are not leashed in any of the Parks. The Park Board is only an
advisory group, so the City Council in June of this year
addressed the fact of wh—e Ter or noto a7op iese F-u-1 es and
mnlce them i nt.n an ordinance. �,Lt was adverti3ed in the agenda
that the City Council would be considering, :rk rules, it was not
advertised in anv wav that the issue of leashes and a change for
the rules in the Park pertaining to dogs would e up for
discussion. Therefore, not enough innut was received from Medina
re,, idents.
The meeting was then opened to the public.
After a 2-hour input from the audience, the majority of the
gesidents present wer
re in favor of voice control and no leashes
jn•_the parks. They were all in favor of the 'pooper-scooper.11
Lfter a lengthy discussion Lanaenbach moved, with r pPat to
Fairweather Park and Medina Park, that the ordinance be change
f.rnm it.s present wording to be voice control 100n of the time,
Goldstein seconded.
Cpldstein moved to amend the motion to provide receptacles in the
aarres for doh PeP-, Mathewson seconded. The motion passed with
Messmer and Reagan voting naye.
The audience was asked to help in policing the t2arks and work
with t.}'1P City on this issue -
ATTACHMENT B
EXCEPRTS OF APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF
THE OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT OF 1971
Legislative declaration.
The legislature finds and declares that all public commissions, boards, councils, committees,
and all other public agencies of this state and
subdivisions thereof exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business. It is the intent of this chapter
that their actions be taken openly and that their deliberations be conducted openly.
The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people,
in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people
to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they
may retain control over the instruments they have created.
Meetings declared open and public.
All meetings of the governing body of a public agency shall be open and public and all persons shall be
permitted to attend any meeting of the governing body of a public agency, except as otherwise provided
in this chapter.
Conditions to attendance not to be required.
A member of the public shall not be required, as a condition to attendance at a meeting of a governing
body, to register his name and other information, to complete a questionnaire, or otherwise to fulfill any
condition precedent to his attendance.
Interruptions -- Procedure.
In the event that any meeting is interrupted by a group or groups of persons so as to render the orderly
conduct of such meeting unfeasible and order cannot be restored by the removal of individuals who are
interrupting the meeting, the members of the governing body conducting the meeting may order the
meeting room cleared and continue in session or may adjourn the meeting and reconvene at another
location selected by majority vote of the members. In such a session, final disposition may be taken only
on matters appearing on the agenda. Representatives of the press or' other news media, except those
participating in the disturbance, shall be allowed to attend any session held pursuant to this section.
Nothing in this section shall prohibit the governing body from establishing a procedure for readmitting
an individual or individuals not responsible for disturbing the orderly conduct of the meeting.
Ordinances, rules, resolutions, regulations, etc., adopted at public meetings -- Notice — Secret
voting prohibited.
(1) No governing body of a public agency shall adopt any ordinance, resolution, rule, regulation, order,
or directive, except in a meeting open to the public and then only at a meeting, the date of which is fixed
by law or rule, or at a meeting of which notice has been given according to the provisions of this
chapter. Any action taken at meetings failing to comply with the provisions of this subsection shall be
null and void.
(2) No governing body of a public agency at any meeting required to be open to the public shall vote
by secret ballot. Any vote taken in violation of this subsection shall be null and void, and shall be
considered an "action" under this chapter.
Times and places for meetings
The governing body of a public agency shall provide the time for holding regular meetings by
ordinance, resolution, bylaws, or by whatever other rule is required for the conduct of business by that
body. Unless otherwise provided for in the act under which the public agency was formed, meetings of
the governing body need not be held within the boundaries of the Territory over which the public agency
exercises jurisdiction.
Violations -- Personal liability
(1) Each member of the governing body who attends a meeting of such governing body where action is
taken in violation of any provision of this chapter applicable to him, with knowledge of the fact that the
meeting is in violation thereof, shall be subject to personal liability in the form of a civil penalty in the
amount of one hundred dollars. The civil penalty shall be assessed by a judge of the superior court and
an action to enforce this penalty may be brought by any person.
July 6, 2004
To: City Council Members
cc: Parks & Recreation Commission Members
Re: (a) Proposed action on the Park & Recreation Commissions recommendation to
revise existing dog rules at Medina Park (Ordinance No. 489)
(b) Submittal of Petitions
Since the City Council meeting on May 10 and the Park Commission meeting on May 17.
concerned citizens have solicited informal input from park users and other interested parties
and circulated a Petition requesting an opportunity for park users to become proactive with
the City Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all
users.
We, the undersigned, submit the Petitions signed to date for your review. Also attached is a
summary of collected signatures, as well as additional information how the survcv was
conducted and explanation of sampling procedures. Based on the positions expressed in the
Petition, we recommend that the Ordinance No. 489 is retained as is for the time being.
The signatories below represent an informal group of park users who were soliciting public
views on this issue.
Lucius 11. Biglow, .lr.
2425 Evergreen Point Road
Medina, WA 98039-1531
Wilma Edmonds
7721 NE 24th St.
Medina, WA 98039-2352
Anne Demitriades
2254 Evergreen Point Road
Medina. WA 98039
cc: City Manager
Director Of Public Works
City Attorney
Police Chief
Thomas J. Bacher
918 Sunset Way
Bellevue, WA 98004
Vicki Horikawa
9616 SE Shoreland Dr.
Bellevue, WA 98004
Sarah Harrison
1007 88th Avenue NE
Medina, WA 98039
MEDINA PARK RULE
PETITION SIGNATURE SOLICITATIONS
Total petition signatures submitted
Total number of pages submitted
Dates of survey_:
Location of survey solicitations
Interviews conducted:
531
94
May 17 through July 4, 2004
Medina Park: 7501/0' to 80°/,
Other locations: 25 201io
Both N eekdav and weekends
Retween 7 am and 7 pm
Interview arrangements: Asked to read petition.
Explained Park Board recommendations
If necessary, referred to Park Board 4/28iO4 letter
Number of individuals collecting signatures: I O
Survey Prof -lies Approximate Percentage
Park users with dogs
Other park users
Other individuals - non park users
Individuals contacted but chose not to sign
TOTAL
Submittal Date: July 6, 2004
55°,�o
15%'
20%
10%,
1 W/110
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parl,s ("the Ordinance")
\VI IEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission-) has, by memorandum
dated April 2S, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that does
in the \ycstcrn part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believ c that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unncccssary and unsound: and
WHEREAS Wc' the Cndersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believ c that public input may he
needed to ycrify the facts stated in the Memo and to dcyclop effective and incxpensiN e solutions to amp
III oblems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last stu-vC=ofpublic opinion vtiith regard to use of the Park vyas conducted in 1989.
and NN e believ e this suryeV reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHFRE.AS The ,ledina City Council at its mecting on May 10. "2_004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearin1-Is
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for' park users to become proactive vyith the City_
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
1\ ITIAI"
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL & D4TF.
- _
,a �I
I
I
PETITION
To: the Nledina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to %1MC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has. ba memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo-), recommended that the Ordin,mce be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Pat-],") be Jcashed at all times: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersi(mned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the :demo and to develop effective and incxpensivc solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with reaard to use of the Park vtias conducted in 1989,
and w e believ-e this surrey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
Wl IEREAS The Medina Cite Council at its meeting on May 10. `004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment:. and
NOW -1 HEREFORE We, the Undersiuned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive th the City
Council and Parks Commission to deVc1op a plan that would improv e the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
INITIAL
& D.XTE
PETITION
I o: l he Medina Cite Council
Re. Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12 24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Connnissiori-) has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the v cstcm part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times:. and
WFIL,REAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the'✓lemo and believe that the
rcconnnended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS N e, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and belieyc that public input may be
needed to � erifN the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy : and
WI IEREAS The last survey of public opinion �� ith regard to use of the Park �N as conducted in 1989-
and �,N c believe this sun cy reasonably reflects current public opir ion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meetin« on llav° 10. 2001 decided to schedule public
hcarin"s on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE 'We. the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hcarinIrs
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that «-ould imprm c the park for all users.
,� IVITIAI.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-1L1IL
& DATE
PETITION
Tu: The Medina Cite Council
Rc: Recommended Cham4cs to MNIC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance')
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 24, 2004 ("the Memo" ), recommended that the Ordinance he amended to require that dogs
in the vyestern part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
NVHF.RE,4S We, the lndersigned, dispute the facts stated in the -'viemo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to env
problems that may exist and to avoid controyersN . and
WM� REAS The last surrey of public opinion with regard to use of the Part: was conducted in 1959.
and vtie believe this surVev reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on Mav 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearinLs on the Amendment: and
'NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Connell to defer public hearing_=s
on the Amendment and to gig e an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the Ciu
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would impim c the park for all users.
NAME (Please Drint) ADDRESS PIION,E E-R�IAIL INITIA1,
PETITION
To: The Medina City Cotmeil
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("thc Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 (`the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all tunes; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the �/lemo and believe that the
recommended amendment ('the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
\WHEREAS We. the l;ndcrsigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to writV the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inekpensive solutions to anv
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last sru-vey of public opinion with rcuard to use of the Park xvas conducted in 1989.
and we believe this surrey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHEREAS The Medina City Cormcil at its meeting on May 10, '1004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the L'rndersigned, respectfully petition .he Council to defer public hearings
ou the ,,\mendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHA,\E E-MAIL INITI ki,
- - - - & DATE
1�?— a
r _
�
i
I
PETITION
To: The Mcdina Citv Council
Rc: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
\V'HERE!IS l he Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times: and
WI IEREAS Wc. the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the `lemo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectiv es of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHFRFAS Wc, the Undersigned.. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to yerifv the facts stated in the Nlemo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that mavexist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park \�'as conducted in 1989,
and gee believe this survey reasonably reflects cun-cnt public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting; on Mav 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that N� ould improv e the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS MOVE. E-NI all_ 1NITL, I
DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina Citv Council
Re: Recommended Changes to tMMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
Wl [ERFAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("thc Commission") has, by mcmorunchIII
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that does
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHFRE:IS Wc, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary_ to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendmct t and believe that public input mad be
needed to verifv the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensiv e Solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
\V'IIERF.AS The last surrey ofpublic opinion with regard to use -)fthe Park vvas conducted in 1989.
and ire belieyc this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
N\ HEREAS The Medina CitV Cormcit at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned. respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearin�s
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
a r -
�
IL
1.
1—._
PETITION
fo: The Medina City Council
Rc: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
\VHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Menlo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that doss
III the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times: and
WHEREAS Wc, the LJndcrsigncd.. dispute the facts stated in the 'Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and ohjecti\ es of the Park- is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHERE.AS Wc. the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and beliee that public input may be
needed to verifN the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to aN oid controversy: and
�1 I IEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park v,as conducted in 1959.
and we believ e this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina Citv COunell at its meeting on Mav 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition :hc COrmcil to defer public hearings
on the Amendtncnt and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that WOUld improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHO\E E-MAIL
i
1
INITI:kL
& D.NTE
j
PETITION
I o: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Chan -es to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
W11L_REAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28- 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the CTndersi�umed, dispute the facts stated in the "demo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objecti%es of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We. the tndersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to ve-iry the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park vvas conducted in 19S9.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
\WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NO"' THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the ColmCil to defer public hcaringrs
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that -,N ould imp ov e the part: for all usa-s.
--
INITIAL
N VME
(Please print) ADDRESS
-.: -
MONE
E-MAIL
S DATE
- - -
-
` 7
1
PETITION
To: The Medina Cite Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHERFAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, b}, memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that does
in the western part of Medina Park ('the Park") be leashed at all times; and
\VHFREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommcnded amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We. the tndersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to aN old controversNand
Wl IEREAS The last sur%cy of public opinion «ith regard to use of the Park vvas conducted in 1989.
and \v c belle% e this survey reasonably reflects cw-rcnt public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THERFFORF We, the undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that WOUld improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL
INITIAL �
& D_ "V E
I ''
PETITION
To: The Medina Cit% Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April IS, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance he amended to require that do<<s
in the western part of Medina Park (-'the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS Nve, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment') is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnccessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, arc opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input maV- be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and mexpensk c solutions to am
problems that may exist and to avoid controyers,,: and
WHEREAS The last sun cy of public opinion with regard to use of the Park vy as conducted in 1959.
and �N e hclicve this sun-cv reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We. the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Cornell to defer public hearin�-,s
on the Amendment and to giye an opportunity for park users to become proactiyc witli the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that %yould improv c the park for all users.
NAME (Please prints ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL �1 I, I<.,L.
j
` f
PETITION
I o: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to 1\,11v1C Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
HEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission-) has, by memorandum
dated April 2S. 2004 ("the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that does
III the �yestern part of Medina Park ("the Park") he leashed at all t mcs; and
WHEREAS �V'c, the Undersigned.. dispute the facts stated in the )1emo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Paris. is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS'e, the L'ndersi<,ncd. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to N°erifv the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpcnsiN c solutions to any
problems that may exist and to alloid controversy: and
WI IEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park v%as conducted in 19S9..
and vyc believ°e this survey reasonably reflects cunTcnt public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City COnnCil at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
lhcarmos on the Amendment:. and
NOW THEREFORE We. the Undersigned, respectfully petition the C OUncll to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactiyc with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that ould improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL & DATE
5
t
PETITION
I o: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MNIC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks (`the Ordinance
WI IERI-:AS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memoraudrnir
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the Nv estern part of Mcdina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times: and
\\ HERF,AS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment') is contrary_ to the aims and objcctiyes of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound; and
I IEREAS Wc.. the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and belieN c that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effcctiye and inespensiye solutions to any
problems that may exist and to a%oid contro%ersy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion �yith regard to use of the Park Nyas conducted in 1989..
and we believe this survey reasonably rePects current public opin_on; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE «'e, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public beat -in
NOW
on the Amendment and to gig e an opportunity for park users to become proactive vyith the City
Council and Parks Commission to dcyelop a plan that N%ould improyc the park Ibr all users.
NAME PleasePrint) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIA1,
PETITION
To: The Medina City COnncii
Re. Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks C'the Ordinance')
Wl IEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has. by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park (--the Park'') be leashed at all tunes; and
WHEREAS We. the Undersigned. dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment (-'the Amendment') is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
w`I IEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use o f the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WI IEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respccti'ully petition tic Council to deter public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
---- — INITIAL
PHo�NF E-MAIL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS & DATE
zy-a-
�
�+ NOA
/-Vc
qgoo
.P r� �"�� 2�
��"�s7 ��
y C� ZziS � A�e
y� sra 1
"A O-b Olt
t
A(3( e�0111 ve NiE C(J�e
qa� M )� s4. Cap
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks "the Ordinance")
WHEREAS "I he Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (--the Commission") has. by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ('the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to requn•c that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park (--the Park") be leashed at all times_ and
W1[EREAS W'e. the Lmdersigned. dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
reconnnended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the airas and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We. the (Jndersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verity the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
W HF.REAS The last surwy of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinio 1: and
WHFRFAS The Medina Citv Council at its meeting, on Ma} 10. 2004 decided to sehedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We. the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to deter public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the Cite
Council and Parks Comnussion to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
INITIAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAH, DATE
J
PETITION
The Medina Cite Councl
R4: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12 '4. Public Parks "tire Ordinance
�41 WRl AS 1 he Medina Parks and Recreation Connnission (--the Commission" j has. by memorandum
dated April 29, 2004 (--tile Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance he amended to require that dogs
in the lvestern part of Medina Park (--the Parke) be leashed at all times: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned. dispute the information stated in the Nlemo and believe that the
recommended amendment (-'the Amendment") is contrar} to the awns and ohjectives _)Pthe Pat k. i;
unnecessarN and unsound: and
Wi fERFAS tiVe, the Undersigned, are opposed to the ,amendment and belierc that public input mad; be
needed to verith the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and incxpensiie so!uttons
to any problems that may exist and to avoid contro%ersy: and
W! l; RFAS "Ihe last survey of public opinion vvith regard to use of the Park ti.as conducted in ? 984.
ani ure believe this surrey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
l.RE;4S The Medina CitN Council at its tneetiti,-, on Mai t0, 004 decided to schedule public
liearings on the ,,lmcndrncnt: and
NO'w' THEREFORE We. the ['ndersigned. respectfullc petition the Council to deter public hearings
on the Amendment and to giro an opportunity for park users to be.onic proactive �rN-ith the City
Council and Parks Commission to deeelop a plan that wou;d impn c the park Cor all ut'crs.
- ---- ------
- ---_ _ - - INITIAL
'`DAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE F MAiE & DATE '
ILI it
-
r J
_ M1
PETITION
To: Fhe Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WI II:RFAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
Wl IFRFAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHFRFAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
Vd1IEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to deter public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
t i r
t
C ,
INITIAL
ADDRESSIONEF,�MAIL & DATE,
Y ,
ISV
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ('the Ordinance")
WHEREAS I he Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (--the Commission') has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 (,,the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park') be leashed at all times: and
NVI IFREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectiNes ofthe Park, is
unnecessary and unsound. and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, arc opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verily the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and vve believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
Wl IEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORF. We, the Undersigned. respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improae the park for all users.
-- -- INITIAL
PHONE E-MAIL,
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS & DATE
�I
I i
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.2,4. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission'^) has, b}memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ('the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all tines; and
WHEREAS We. the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment') is contrary to the our s and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WFIEREAS Wc, the Undersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verity the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion, and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2(04 decided to schedule public
hearings on the .Amendment: and
NOW THERliFORE We. the Undersigned. respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
--- - —�- INITIAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL DATE
f
F fi
i
i
y
� L 7
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MI -MC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordnlance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (-the Commission') has. by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment (-'the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion-. and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment:. and
NOW THEREFORE We. the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
— — _ — INITIAL
NAME (Please print) I ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL & DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ('-the Ordinance*')
W'1 IEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (,-the Commission") has. by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 (`the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ('the Park") be leashed at all times: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned. dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment') is contrary to the aims and obiectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
W'IIEREAS We. the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to am
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion w°ith regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and Nve believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We. the Undersigned, respectfiilly petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
INITIAL
p --- - - --- --
---_------ I
NAME Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL &DATE
-
i _. I
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks (--the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has. by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park (-'the Park'') be leashed at all tunes: and
�y'TIVREAS We.. the Indersigned. dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment (--the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound. and
WHEREAS We. the Undersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop ellective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last surveyof public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion, and
Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
WI [ERF:AS 17ne Medina City
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that vtiouid improve the park for all users.
--- PHONE - T MAIL --
INITIAL
NAME (Please print:) —� ADDRESS &DATE
I
i
r
PETITION
To the Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to'_V MC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission') has. by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that doss
in the \N estern part of Mccima Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times: and
WHEREAS We, the Lndersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recornincnded amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnccessary and unsound; and
�y HFREAS We, the t;ndersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to deN clop etTective and inespensivc solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WI IFREAS The last survey ofpublic opinion Keith regard to use ofthe Park Nt°as conducted in 1989.
and we bCliCv e this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on Mav 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE 'We.. the Undersigned, respectfully petition (he Council to defer public hcarin<_'s
on the amendment and to cm e an opportunity for park users to become pr(MCM c -�N ith the ('it}'
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that vcould imp m c the part: for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-NIAII. IN TI I
— I
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12?4, Public Parks r-the Ordinance')
WHEREAS "ncc Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (--the C.)mmission') has, by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Memo")_ recommended that the ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park (--the Park") be leashed at all tirries: and
W`IIERGAS We. the undersigned. dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recorrmiended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound-- and
WHFREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verity, the facts stated in the Memo and to develop cilectve and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHERFAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion:. and
WHERFAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on Mav 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW I HFREI;ORE We. the undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to deler public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the Cit'
Council and Parks Convnission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
-- — I -ITIAL
NAME: (Please print) ADDRESS PHONP. E-MAIL & DATE—:
i
- - - - --
PETITION
To The Medina City Council
Rey Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance-)
WIIEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission') has, by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park (''the Park") be leashed at all times_ and
W}IERL:AS We. the Undersigned. dispute the facts stated in the M:mo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment*') is contrary to the awns and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound, and
WI IFREAS We, the Undersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and vve believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
%N IIER> AS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public:
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW TIIERFFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
---- - I N I T IAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL & DATE
il
1
1T f,
I
i
i
PETITION
To: The Medina City C ouncil
Re. Reconh*nended ('hangcs to MMC Chapter 12. -4, Public Parks (" the Ordinance")
W1II-RF:AS i tie %Icdina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the (ommission") has. by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Memo'"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to rcyuirc that .togs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
NNTJ R}?AS We" the undersigned, dispute the fiat t= stated in the Mane and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectifies of the Park. i
unnecessary and unsound; and
0�'HEREAS We.. the Undersigned, are opposed to the Vnendment and believe that public ;,mw I.lav he
needed to verily the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive s,,du!iors to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WIJEREAS 'I he last survey ofpublic opinion with regard to use of the Park ,,,as conducted in ; 989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
%N III REAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on %la_v W, 2004 decided to schedule public
I
earings o❑ the Amendment. and
NOW THEREFORE We. the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public 4icarin�ts
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to bc.,ome proactive with the f pity
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would imprkwe the park for Al users.
PHONE
I
w
E-MAIL INITIAL
& DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Rc: Recommended Changes to 1MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("tile Ordinance")
W1IEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (`'the ('ommission") has, by memorandum
dated April 2S. 2004 ("the Nlemo" ), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that does
in the westeni part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all tunes; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and belicNe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and oblectk es of the Parl<, is
unneecssary and unsound; and
WHEREAS we, the Undersigned, arc opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to vcrifv the facts stated in the Mcmo and to develop effective and incxpensivc solutions to anv
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last sun�ey ofpublic opinion with regard to use of the Park Nvas conducted in 1959,
and WC beheae this sureO' reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
NVIIERF.AS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment;�and
NOW TI IEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the .=ymendtncnt and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive vWith the City
Councit and Parks Commission to develop a plan that %M Mild improN c the park for all users.
11:11.
NAME (Please print) � ADDRESS PHONE. E-M1NITI
AIL I E
i —
PETITION
l o: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks i "the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (-,the C:)inmission ) has, by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Memo'). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ('the Park") be leashed at all times: and
Wl IERLAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ('the Amendment") is contrary to the aids and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound. and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop ctiective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WI IEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WI IEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned. respectiblly petition the Council to deter public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would inprcve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS
- --- INITIAL.
T PHONE F-MAIL
----. & DATE" -i
i
J
PETITION
Fo: The Medina City Council
Re: Reconnnended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ;"the Ordinance'i
N\ HERE,NS The Yledina Parks and Recreation Commission (..the ( ommission") has, b} nncrnorandu+n
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance he amended to require that dog,,
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all tirries; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned. dispute the information stated in the Memo and belicic that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is cowrar% to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS Vve, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to N erify the information stated in the Merno and to develop eifcctive and inexpensive sulutions
to anti° problems that may exist and to avoid contro�ersv: and
WHEREAS The last surrey ofpublic opinion with regard to use otthe Park was conducted ut 1989_
and vNe believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinio i. and
Wl1LRE.aS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10. 2U04 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
Nt)W THEREFORE We, the [indersigned. respccttull_N petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that %wuid improve the park for all users.
--- LNITIAI
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL.
& DA'TF,
j
i
I
PETITION
l o: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to M VIC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHERLAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ('the Commission') has. by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Memo'). recommended that the Ordinarce be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park-') be leashed at all times- and
WI IFRFAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in file Memo and believe that the
reconunended amendment (-'the Amendment') is contrary to the anus and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound: and
'LMIERFAS We. the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and niexpensive solutions
to am problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
W HERF,AS The last survcv of public opinion with regard to use ofthe Park was conducted in 1989_
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion. and
W1If- REAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on Ma,, 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW TIILREFORE We. the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to bc,.ome proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
INITIAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL & DATE
C
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks F-the Ordinance')
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the (onunissiori') has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times_ and
WHE1ZEAS We. the undersigned. dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment') is contrary to the aims and objecti%es of the Park. i>
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy_ and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use ofthe Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinio-v and
Wl IEREAS the Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We. the Undersigned. respectfully petition the Council to delcr public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would imprcve the park for all users.
--- — — -- — ImTIAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL & DATE
4 i i
4
1 !L
PETITION
To: The Nledina Cite Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks "the Ordinance")
W1 I ERF.AS 'I he Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (C'the Commission') has. b% memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ('"the Memo-'). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ('the Park") be leashed at all ames-, and
WHEREAS We, the Lndersigned. dispute the information stated in the Memo and belicve that the
recommended amendment (""the Amendment*') is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound, and
\Vl4FREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verily the information stated in the Memo and to develof effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversN: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use olthe Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
\\'HEREAS The Medina Cit} Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive v,N ith the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
INUTIAL
_.—
N.A3IE (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL & DATE-
: I
t {
�t
1 "
J
9
_ � '}`r \ -J / Cyr ✓C�� 7 F J ' ..
a
i
PETITION
fo: The Medina Citv Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks I"Ille Ordinance')
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission') has. by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ('-the Memo''). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park (--the Park") be leashed at all times: and
WI IFRLAS we, the Ihndersigned. dispute the infomiation stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to am problems that mays exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinio 1: and
WT 11, REAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on �lay 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to deter public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would impreie the park for all users.
------------ — INITIAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL & DATE.
I I
1 `
i
1 i
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by
memorandum dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be
amended to require that dogs in the western part of Medina Park (("the Park") be leashed
at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that
the recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives
of the Park, unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was
conducted in 1989, and should, we believe, be updated; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May '.0, 2004 decided to proceed
with the Amendment and to schedule public hearings thereon-, and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, believe that further study is needed to verify, the facts
stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to such problems
as exist and to avoid controversy, and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are willing to volunteer time and skills to optimize the
enjoyment of the Park by the public and to minimize the cost of enforcing the Ordinance,
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer
public hearings on the Amendment and to support the updating of the survey of public
opinion and the verification of the facts stated in the Memo, it being understood that we
will proceed with such survey and verification with diligence.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by
memorandum dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be
amended to require that dogs in the western part of Medina Park (("the Park") be leashed
at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that
the recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives
of the Park, unnecessary and unsound-, and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was
conducted in 1989, and should, we believe, be updated-, and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to proceed
with the Amendment and to schedule public hearings thereon; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, believe that further study is needed to verify, the facts
stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to such problems
as exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are willing to volunteer tirre and skills to optimize the
enjoyment of the Park by the public and to minimize the cost of enforcing the Ordinance;
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer
public hearings on the Amendment and to support the updating; of the survey of public
opinion and the verification of the facts stated in the Memo, it being understood that we
will proceed with such survey and verification with diligence.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-IVIA,
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by
memorandum dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be
amended to require that dogs in the western part of Medina Park (("the Park") be leashed
at all times-, and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that
the recommended amendment (`the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives
of the Park, unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was
conducted in 1989, and should, we believe, be updated; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May ' 0, 2004 decided to proceed
with the Amendment and to schedule public hearings thereon; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, believe that further study is needed to verify, the facts
stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to such problems
as exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are willing to volunteer time and skills to optimize the
enjoyment of the Park by the public and to minimize the cost of enforcing the Ordinance,
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer
public hearings on the Amendment and to support the updating; of the survey of public
opinion and the verification of the facts stated in the Memo, it being understood that we
will proceed with such survey and verification with diligence.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL
PETITION
ho: Be Medina City Council
Re: Reconunended Changes to MMC Chapter 12 24. Public Parks ( --the Ordinance'*)
WHFRLAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the t'omnussion") has. by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ('-the Park") be leashed at all thncs: and
\V1IF,REAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in the Memo and betide that the
recommended amendment ('-the Amendment") is contrary to the ai_ns and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WI IEREAS We. the Undersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may he
needed to verify, the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to and problems that may exist and to avoid contro%ersN: and
W'HERFAS "1'he last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonable reflects current public opinion: and
\l111,REAS The Medina Cite Council at its mecting or, May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment. and
NOW' THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition th-- Council to defer public hearings
on the .Vnendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactiv c w ith the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would imprme the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
--- — — — & DATE
j
I
i
i
PETITION
Toy The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
\\ HFREAS Pic Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (" the ( ,ommission") has, bN memorandum
dated ApriI 28, 2004 ("tile Memo,'), recommended that the Ordint.rtcc be amended to require that ilo�,s
in the western part of Niedina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times: and
WHEREAS We.. the L;ndersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectiv cs of the Park. is
unncccssarvand unsound; and
\\ I IEREAS We, the L;ndetsigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effcctiN c and inexpensive solutions to xnv
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last stu•vey of public opinion NN ith regard to use of the Park «as conducted in 1980.
and we believe this surN ey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
\V'HFRE_\S The Medina City Council at its meeting on \1av 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment and
� )'N THERE; ORE Wc. t,c Ujldersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment aj�d to -ire an opportunity for park users to become proactiv e with rile Cite
Council and Parks Commission to dcv�elop a plan that would imprcve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
— — — — & DATF.
LA
� _ 7i�;� � � t ��r� (� ;`i G1,7 i'�L'e 11'�� i`�:' 7`i ],`G �-C• frlcr: �C;_ � `
_
-W r
_ r
7
i
�t to
_A_ --fir t
PETITION
fo: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (`the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ('the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the wcstern part of Medina Park ("the Park') be leashed at all tmes: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
W'I IEREAS We. the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendmen and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to am
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS "I he last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned. respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to be: ome proactive with the Cit%
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
� _
NAME (Please print)
�'YITIAL
ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL
& DATE
Y
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 (`the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the Iacts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW Tl IEREPORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
INITIAL
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MAIL
& DATE
[
J
is
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHF:RF.AS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park (`the Park") be leashed at all times; and
"I1FRFAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WFII:RFAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WFIFREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
\V1 ll'_RL'AS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW TFIFRFFORF We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition tie Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
r _ & DATE
i
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ('the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has. by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park-) be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We. the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Nano and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop ellcctive and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversv: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use 01 the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
VOW THEREFORE We. the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Park ('the Ordinance")
�N I IEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (-the Commission') has. by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ( "the Park") be leashed at all tines: and
WHEREAS We. the I_'ndersigned. dispute the facts stated in the Mcmo and believe that the
recommended amendment (--the Amendment') is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHERL:AS We. the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verily the facts stated in the Memo and to develop etTective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controvers and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use ofthe Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS fhe Mcdina City Council at its meeting on Mav 10, 2(04 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to deter public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
---- l & DATE
-----------
t
PETITION
Fo: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks (--the Ordinance")
WFIFRFAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (-the -ommission`•) has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo")' recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park C'the Park") be leashed at all times: and
WHEREAS We. the Ihulersigned. dispute the fads stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment (--the Amendment-) is contrary to the aims and objectives of tile Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
W1IFREAS We, the [?ndersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public unput may be
needed to verify the ]acts stated in the Memo and to develop etlectivc and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use ofthe Park was conducted in 1989,
and vve believe this ,urvev reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS Tlie Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2( 04 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE We. the Undersigned, respectful] petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity Ior park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Conunission to develop a plan that "ould impro-, e the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
- -- — --- --- - & DATE
I 4 <
r
� I
I
PETITION
h,� M, 1 0: 1'Cdilla Cit\ COUDCit
i�k:- Reconlrnendcd Chzwgl,_ to 's/1MC Chapicr MCA Puhjic Rark� c'tho, VdinaticV4
the Med in a Parks and Re creation Conumsskin i nhe C oi I -(n I h� n
dared April 28. 2004 (-die Merno-). reconuilended tinit LhL Ordiflatl:C' N2 2trended in require wx dogs
iII (lie vNestt-mnl ron orodurna Fork (-the lbrk- ; b� leishk:d at all and'
A HUMA?i N%Nc� th�- 1 jispLltC' he fJoIS stated Ul A MeMo ��illd bCLC��: 01-n
��f,x)rmntendcd amendmont (-the Arliendment") js conirul-,\ to tho airs and o1jecuics Wthe Ack, K
.jrinous8i,1 and unsound: and
;Left R1".Y NO. Me Widersigned. are opposed a; the Amwndmnt w,.j ;7)vhevo that puhhc input my W,
weded to woritj We Got, seated in the Mein,") alid to deNulop elfacKe and inexpen,;k., �,ojucioiv, to aj,x
whimis that rna,, and to an oij contro) er:-N : und
wk HQUAT5 !lie last survc1 o! public opil-ion x; ah Wgard W Ust' A We Park WS ColhKkA P! 1989.
A vo behme thk auvq rcasenahlZ rt.-flecis cum--nc, pulliic op;nion. a!id
01 WREV; The Mccibin C icy Council at its rmjmg on :Ma j A A14 dcCidCul to puhlu�
on the :\,rilerldnlent: and
- NOW FURIADRE We. We Undersigned. renpectKill) petilkni the CouncH to dl.,,I`or (')',Ibis t eu rigs
"Cl 11w Amendment and to "J%C an opportunily MY part. usors to )Cci.-Ivne 111C ( it-,
Council and Parks Commission to de%elop a plan that voould tic park for all usf_,rs,
NAME (Please print) IN ITI %L
ADDRESS PHONE E-NI AIL
& DATE
--------- --
W,
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to'VINIC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The AJedina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo").. recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that do(-,s
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times: and
WHERF,AS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the "vtcmo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the Aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
V',WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion %yith regard to use of the Park Baas conducted in 1989,
and we believe this stu-vey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City C0Lll1Clt at its mectinZ on May I0. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THFREFORE We. the Undersk-ned. respectfully petition he Council to defer public hcarim's
Oil the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive %pith the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
-- & DATE
sae 10c7w
I
PETITIO
Fo: The Medina City Council
Rc: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (" the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 2S, 2004 ("the memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to raluirc that dogs
in the -,N estern part of -Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
%WHEREAS Wc, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Parl<. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input ma\ be
needed to verifv the facts stated in the Memo and to develop cffective and inexpensive solutions to any,
problems that may exist and to avoid controv orsv; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion ,Nith regard to use of the Park Was conducted in 1989.
and ae believ e this sure ey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on Mav 10. 200=1 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
SOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunily for park users to become proactive 1Nith the City
Council and Parks Commission to dcvclop a plan that would improve the parl. for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL.
_ & D_IF
,
•
��-
C
PETITION
II o: 111e Medina Cite Council
Re: Recommended Changes to M-MC Chapter 12.24, Public Par;cs ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation (commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to rcyuirc that does
in the western part of.Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times: and
WI IFREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives ofthe Park, is
unncccssary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop el'fcctivc and inexpensive solutions to anv
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion -,rith re-ard to use of the Park \vas conducted in 1989,
and we bclie� e this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hcarin-s on the Amendment: and
',,0W THEREFORE \Vc, the Undersigned. respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to -,IN e an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that WOUld improve the park for all users.
i NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-14141E INITLU.& p,4TE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("thc Connnission") has, by memorandum
dated April 2S, 2004 ("the Memo"), recomnrcndcd that the Ordinance be amended to require that d01-1s
in the vwestern part of Medina Park ("the Park") be lcashr d ,a.t all limas;
WI I ERE AS Wc, the [;ndcrsigncd. dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and \� c believe this survey reasonahly reflects current public opinion: and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meetin- on %lay 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hcarin;s on the Amendmcnt: and
1 HEREFORE N c, the Lndersi,u ied, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hcarillus
on the Amendment and to «i� c an opportunity for park users to become proactive -,K ith the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) I ADDRESS PHONE E-NIAH_. INITIAL
& DATE
t ; •� 71
V
PETITION
To: I -lie Medina Cite Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24.. Pllhlic Pars ("the Ordinance")
WHFREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has. by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the !Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to rcquirc that does
in the NN estcr❑ part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and bclicrc that the
rcconunendcd amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park.. is
unncccssary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believ e that public input mad be
needed to \ erify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
Problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last sury cv of public opinion Frith regard to use of the Park Nras conducted in 1989,
and vre helievc this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medirla City' C oLmCII at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment: and
\OW 1l IERLFORE Wc, the Undersigned. respectfully petition the Council to defer public hcarin<-s
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive vN ith the Ciro
COMIClt and Parks Commission to develop a plan that \Aould improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
- - ---
PHONE E-MAIL
0
INITIAL.
& DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (" the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 2S, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that does
iu the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") he leashed at all times: and
WI [EREAS We, the Undersigned. dispute the facts stated in the %Irmo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objecti\-es of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound: and
\WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendmert and believe that public input may he
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last suryev of public opinion with regard to use of the Park vvas conducted in 1959.
and Nwe believe this survev reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHERFAS The :Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfullypetition the Council to defer public hearings
on the .Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the Cite
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that �N-ould improve the park for all users.
PHONE
. - t � � 'ice �`-�� - � � � l � -1 T %"-' ti �' �� _ � � - � �•�l.�
--- - - - - _
PETITION
To: I he Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MNIC Chapter 12.24, Public Paris (--the Ordinance")
WIJERF.AS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission's) has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 (-'the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that does
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times: and
G%J LREAS We. the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in the Memo and bclie%e that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the guns and obiectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound:. and
y/'l IERF1:AS We. the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verity the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensivc solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controN,ersV: and
W1I1 RLAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use (T ilic Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion and
\VHLREAS The Medina Cif}Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schedule public
hearin.-s on the Amendment: and
NOW "1 1FREFORE We. the Undersigned. respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
&DATE
I
_T
/v
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12,24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the: Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Meta and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would imrTove the park for all users.
INITIAL
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MAH,
& DATE
`fir •a n,`�
,<�
JJ(J✓�"C-✓:�. L-�_:
11-C1..�LLG+�-�.<G-/I.C,.f'f
�_)✓ �
:_l :Y��L};'/!./T.
i .>��_'<J
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all tir. ies, and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in. the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion, and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
INITIAL �
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MAIL
& DATE
P E TIT ION
iz: 01jil�"Us to WIC, CIMPRer i :.24. SM Pavk� OI%iindjlc�, )
11 M VKh S i h�: Mcdin,l Pmi's and Rec rem I I CC ;qw-ni"N ivA It nk:' ( oll-11 Wn, ) !)v n I,.'
kbryd April S. 24M (-,he Menio",. r-ocomincild,�J "hat F[Ic Odil;;nit:e he LIni,,,rided 10 raudw Wavion
III 1h.-, yart of WdArt Park (7he Kirk-, ho Washai a! ad unwN: anti
v% M R, v` \% I, t1w 1 ridersigned. 111SPIT11-C the A, t • 'v I aj 111 1 i)(; " " t I--'V it I'd e i.l,'i
I! MkJldc", a I I le nd I I leni I tl1,. -Vile.; I d, n I C n C, i i� Cot It r a ry lo M C a in1w a I R! o In icc"i" I;' t7 , 11--'L, P,Si
111d aild
the 1 :,uc oppmed 10 &C Aincridm,:Tt aliLl C i ho!
ilwls statod in the Merih) no! w, Jc,,clo;l
n1jOnIS that lWq MINI and to MY COM170NUSS 1 allo
I -A - k 1 )
'A o1'pUr"h1C opWon ukh recant 10 We
';J \\c hoijc,: this stoic) wrisonabo retlect, CL!Wnt T,1i10i?c opil Ion: ill!
in 1 TRI: :%S " k': \jcdin., ( 'it! Council w its tilceilng 'm Ma.. 111, �I Iu4 dcCidi:.j, to
n _Ivmi_is on lhC !,,oilendmeril: and
N Irw 1 11FREFORU %Q� I- V401.00 WIV C IWO! ZO JMr PUS, 11CO-i'19-i
1he %mendm_,nt in-o-1 n) t b". [Kirk aser- w, hwconm: proach%c N. ith nc,
au nxt Kuks i:,-, jelch,f) ;I Q1, that %voald &Mrow the park Air all
INITIAL
NAML (Nea*e print) ADDRESS HIONT E-MAK D) kT F
PrETIIfIo)N
'File Njedilla ch y i3Ounci=
rIt : tecommended C�°hanges to iv MI C Chapter l2 24, Public Par'e> (`the :sec ilisa,�ct°')
W-HER AS The Medina Parks and Recreation C:.o?tlrnissior €:<ihe _ommission"j has., by rnv=noi,andum
da-,ed April 28, 2004 t"the z�'lemo" ), recommended, that the (�zrdirsance l� asnen;ft�d tc, Ie�uire th t d.�gs
€i_nt the western part of Medina Park !"the Park bo, leashed at ail tines; and
W"REREAS, We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated it-, the v emo and. befieve tila-% tiro
i t:corr mended amendment ("the, Amendment"} is contrary to the ails and s) bJ,ctsvcs of III, I ,rk i'
un-kiecesswy and unsourtd; and
WFIEf JEAS', We, the Undersigne i, are opposed tie -die Amendi men! anti, Dexec ', that 13ub;vc input artay y t,
p d�elovard icxpensive s�iltlos� to ally
Ieded to verify thefvcts stated ir. the Metric and
r>roble ens that may exist and to avoid controversy, and
�, ff=�•f2i° AS The hest sue- ey of public opinion with regard to :Ase ct the Park �%as c;sara�#cactuu. Paz : �i),
2D,j wo believe this si e�� reasonably reflects ctlsraslt , ubli� opira on- and
'VVH1.RJ', S The Medina City Council at its rneetinL on May 10, ;:'.OQ& decided to schii dule t,ub) i>
i£,-riligF, on the Amendment; and
i~+ C3W 'i NI REFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully Petiiir rs :he Council to fie fi-r s ib is (IeWhit s
on. fine rnendnieni and to give an opportunity for park user.``.: to bccern& (proactive will' Til;: C"'
Coun:.il and Parks C onunission to develop a plan that .could improve, the park for ail users.
INR';iAl
li (Please print) r�DDRESS PRONE
� ��i { a'k DATE
E --r
i
PEMION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12,24, Public Parks ("the O?rdina=e")
WHEREAS The Mediae Park$ and Recreation Commission ('the Com missimi") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("tbs Merino"), recommemW that the Oniinama be amended to requim the dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("tine Park") be leashed at aH tines; acid
WHEREAS We, the Undamped, dispute the fixate stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amandrnent") is contrary to tle aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHF W We. the UndwWpad, are oppoead to the Amendment and believe tams public input may be
needed to va *y the Scts stated is the Masao and to develop eifoctive and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist 8nd tD Awid oonuumW> and
wHMAS The last survey of public opinion with W99d to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and vx believe this survey re"ormbly refiects current public opinion; and
WMMAS 1U Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Ate; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the l�n► , Nay peti�an the Connell to d#� i b $
on the � Wd W SM anoppxtwty lw pwt" = to became proactive Frith the City
Council and Parke CMmisim to dayebp a *n that vmuld iuVrove the park far all useta.
NAME (ram ONO
J
ADDRZSS
_�� fin /�! � � � �•�, L. " _" i _ ' l
PHONE
Z- IAIL & DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the: Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all timem; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the ]Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment'') is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MAIEL
INITIAL
& DATE
2 �L,-,',�
rz�
_
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12,24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("tbe Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Lindersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
wHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposod to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop e$rx tine and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and m avoid con trove T,, and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard w use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW TIMREFORE We, the undersigned, regVetfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendm at and to give an ogwftw iy fw perk users to become Fowtive with the city
Council and parks Commission to develop a plan that would inxxove the park for all users.
NAME (Please prist)
ADDRESS
PRUNE
E-MAIL
�l D
i
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the: Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all Imes; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment's is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy-, and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
'FIJII-Nul T`L�I7�pO1�E We, the Undlersi r�pec'Tully petitlot2 the Council to defier public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
INITIAL
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MAIL
& DATE
i..(.f'.
/ W
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all tunes; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
IIVITIAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL & DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that rrmy exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2,004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully Petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MA17L
INITIAL
& DATE
r ,
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all tines; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use o;Fthe Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition die Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MAIL
INIT1(AL
& DATE
%.','.y � C✓Y� +f' , C L '
G" �7
47' Sy ~
jr,/ a
a
`..ice-Ci�-�• �+/i Yes MryA�C
/ �l �w76
/� //'' MO
44
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the I Jndersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment') is contrary to the slims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Metres and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to b =me proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
INITIAL
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MAIL
& DATE
i
c _r
a
'�q;•ti' if
� 4 �-r;}ytir
t*ZS�?�SL".�_�,,,�.
�R
�<<µ:a
PETITION
l i,e tedii 1;it C:ojr-Incil
t`�r}f A The Medina Parks mid Recreation?.C➢II3 ii?SSiQFk . c.4' iLi22 ?ii:;SSt3It'j) has, by irzi 4Y?f31<4.21L't?Cl
d t"d At 18, 200 ("the lerrio 'b recomm, ended that ttie Ordinaf ice be amended to requar; that clogs
ii=. t`rc wester dart of Medina Park "the Park") be leashed at all times; and
wl i.l+,REAS We, t.ti', ',"ndersigiled, disjtute till t:3.ct.s stated 3i7 the Nicalc+ and beneve Uhat Sl
rssi t. l`.;i contrary to the .3ii%iS and objectives (IT-P.i•
�3,],:.,
r�-i:Onlillended amei-idment. _he Amendment' ,
" J. and unsot nC, and
+ HERE:AS We, th undersigned, are apposed to the Amendment and: believe that pob;ic input ln.ay be
I ,,'e:ded to verify the facts stated in the Memo and io develop effective and inexplmisive solutions .'L^ ali,4-
rt �leylls that may exist and to avoid controversy, and
La' iL t r The lusr survey of pLiblic, op ILioii , it}i re and tl) Ilse f s ,he Fa, k was c noucted In
: ': � �Ni; believeLi1.is surveyregSOnabt" reflects curreni publib' opiniJi7, and
�`�ri..:t.i RJFAS mite Medina Civ., l��jImc-1 at its Incetit-19 cirs li aNY l:), iG*�*;<• ii.eCideCl toswit�..d'.ile i;Csn31C.
ht�Etl'R:IUs on thy: A-meneirnern. and
.,e :)N� I j4E EFOR-i. We, the Undersigned, respectfizil f Petition the C.ouncii to defer public h ar ii-gs
c ii the 11nendment and to give ari opportunity for park users to b-,come proactive tvitil the � Ity
r 01111cil and Parks collimission to develop a plan that would improve the park- fur all users.
NAME tPicasc Print) ADDRESS
OF419m 1
4�5-Sc;3^
- 2G i 3
1
E, ImAiL
> 7e 4e
IN CTTAL
& DA'€'3{.
ck i
ane &s ey 2�Ci`i —7`i AvcNr hfS,/ /fay ��c�r►t �.ne
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
\\`HERE,SS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("tile Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that do�-!s
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times, and
HFRF..AS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe tE,,t the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectivcs of the Park.. is
unnecessary and unsound; and
W HFREAS We.. the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that pu!�lic input ma} be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effcctivc and inespensiv e solutions to anV'
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHF.RFAS The last survey ofpublic opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1080,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
\Vf-1ERE1/\S The Medina City CoUneil at its meeting on May 10, g004 decided to schedule public
hcarines on the Amendment and
NOW THEREFORE Wc, the t'ndersi,ned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Coo.ncil and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would imp -ove the park for all users.
NAhIE (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL
IVITI.aI.
& DACE_
j-
wA r
f
I53 P c W,rc. °Y
—— -- 1 -
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission') has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment') is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
& DATE
A
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment'l is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Mein and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opirdon; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PH43NE '-MAH, INITIAL& DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Menlo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all tines; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendmenfl is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
INITIAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHI�NE E-MAIL. & DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MAIL
INITIAL
& DATE
�, ✓ j t � a J.' G � / �; C ��
c
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance"
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park (`the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the a ms and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop etTec_ive and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
&DATE
i6tcle ��2v�izp j
J
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ('-the Ordinance")
WHEREAS "The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the (Zommission') has. by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all tines; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ('the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to anv
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use o Fthe Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to be:ome proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
INITIAL
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE E-MAIL
& DATE
�LJ
li
UZ
r
.
t)
f
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the: Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment') is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Metro and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to Emome proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHIDNE E-MAIL INITIAL
& DATE
i
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Menlo"), recommended that the Ord nine be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all t imes; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opirdon; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would impRove the park for all users.
Il ffL4,L
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL & DATE
PETITION
Io: I lie Medina City Council
Re: Reconnnended Changes to MMC Chapter 12?4. Public Parks (--the Ordinance")
WHEREAS Tlne Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission') has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 (*'the Menio"), recommended that the Ordint rice be amended to require That dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park') be leashed at all times: and
WFIERLAS Wc, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in the Mcino and believ e that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound: and
\,N'1FERLAS We. the Undersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use ofthe Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WI IF:RFAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10. 2004 decided to schcdulc public
hearings on the Amendment: and
NOW THEREFORE WC. the Undersigned. respectfully petition the Council to deter public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
1 INITIAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL &DATE 1
- -- --
PETITION
To: "17he Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memel'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all t imes; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment'') is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Mena and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PH13NE
E-MAIL
INITIAL& DATE
r
tI I gL --1)
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission') has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all tli nes; and
WHEREAS We, the Indersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effNAive and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users_
INITIAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHI�NE E-MAIL & DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12,24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission') has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Orduvince be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would imrwove the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PH43NE '-MAII' INITIAL& DATE
i.
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
W1I1-RFAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Conunission ("the Comuussion") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ('-the Memo*'). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ('-the Park") be leashed at all times: and
yt ill RLAS We. the Undersigned. dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ('-the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound: and
\k HFREAS We. the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verifv the information stated in the Memo and to develoa effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controvers}: and
WHEREAS the last survey ofpublic opinion with regard to use ofthe Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion, and
WHFRFAS The Medina Citv Council at its mectin on May 10. 2)04 decided to schedule public
hcarimos on the Amendment, and
NOW THERFFORF We, the Undersigned. respectfully petition t-ie Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Conu7ussion to develop a plan that �,N-ould improve the park for all users.
INITIAL
E-MAIL & DATE: �I
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks �"the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opiniori; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 204 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MAIL
IlVITIAL
& DATE
U0-7 ryc -}
IAJA
.'O,f%r1C
,.,
'? ZZl �`J�ct�cen
4z5�
`K30-111VO
r�CJk.S�cr�rt
�S
C0AM.Cow,
t,r7��orf
f T
y
i
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We; the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opirion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
INITIAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PH��NE E'M�' & DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all banes; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment') is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS & DATE
r r
-� '
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound-, and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion, and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment-, and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
& DATE
i
t '
j
1 � i
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Park: ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission') has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We; the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment''} is contrary to the aims an objec ves cf the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Meta and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to b xome proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
--
INITIAL
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-M�
& DATE
f G l 3 �ue reN.e�
CAM
L:
32
r
_
y53 _--C?bJ
. 't l ✓1vc
'ti
V�4Ln
jIPc,�L.� t1r
�kI-�ari�. nE�'
� IG
L
-� rl
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks (`the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (`the Commission') has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 (`the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park (`the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment (`the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy, and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use o:"the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
& DATE
r ,
ti. r
PETITION
The _'Medina Citr Council
ke: IZecornmended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Part:s (-.the Ordinance'
�btll RFAS The Medina Parks and Recreation (:)mmission ("ihc Comr_lission'"}has, h} memorandum
iate�i April 28, 2004 (.`the Memo'-). recommended that the Ordinmee be amended to recuirc that do<as
ill the kwstern part of Medina Park (..the Part:") he ie`ished at all times: and
k\ Itl_RLAS yN e, the t'ndcrsigned. dispute the ImOrnlation stated Ln the Memo and bcliee e that the
recommended amendment ,"tile Amendment') is conna.ti to the aims and objectives of the Pail., is
u,inecessary and unsound: and
V 11I RrAS Wc, the t:ndersipned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input rna% he
needed to verif} the urtbrmation stated in the Memo and to develop etlective and inerpensi=.e u)lution,,
to any probienvs that may 'es.ist and to avoid conur,>vcrsv: anit
V� IIFIUI�\S The last survey of public opinion with retTard to use of the Park Vas conducted in 1989,
and pie helieve this survey reasonahh, retlects cur-ent public opisniz'n: and
\N I II UI/VS The: Medina Cit:, Council at its, r;�ee?in,? on :May 10) 2.)01 decided to �.chedul(' public
t 1 ru3-.;s on the. Amendment: �a id
Nt M 11 I1-RFFO1ZF th"e. the Undersigned, respect folk petition tine Council to deter public 11, - r inOs
,)n the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to he_cme proactive �Ni1h the ('it,,
Cvuncil and Pails Corrmission to detirelop a plan that vsoul d imprc the park for Jill users.
-- -- - -- -
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PlIOtiE � E ,tiIAIL INITIAL
— -- -- & DATE
ti I 1 s ♦ I r .Y I r
r
l
!l♦
r ' r
i
PETITION
I o: The Medina Citti Council
R.: Recommended Changes to M%1C Chapter 1 124. Public Parks (--the Ordinance")
Ir REAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Co11111,issiort (-'the Co mussjon has. by :l;emorandutn
dated .April 28. 2004 ("tile Menlo-). ). recommen&d that the Ordinince he amended to reduire that dons
in th; evestern part ol'Medina Park ("tire Park") be leashed at all times: and
V HEREAS We. the 1 �ndcrsigncci. dispute the it'lormation stated n the Mcrno and belie~e that tltc
recomtlicnded amcndmernt ("she ��nendment"J is contras, to the aims and objectises of the P.trk. is
ulinccessary and-:nsound; and
1A I If REAS We, the ( nders:gned, are opposed :--(: the Amendmem and belie-,-, that public ktput may he
ncrcded to Wri6 the mfbrmation stated in the %lemo «nd to dcWhT ctlectiN,e and inetpenshe mmitions
CO ane prOble2ns that r'la% exist and to aV o7d controtcrjti: and
kk t ll RF A`i I Ile last survey of puhljc opinion :1iti: regard to use : � t the Park �sas condt�eted in 1 `189,
and w�, bclievC this scree, reasonable reflects current publjc opillj(n and
111 Ri .-AS t he :Medina Cite Counci! at its nice?ing:);l A-1a, I0, Oiil decided to schedt:l publjc
ir.°arjngs oil the Aaneniment: and
t iV IHI-Rl 1-ORF Ate, the t 1ndersigned, respecti-uil\ petition i%le (ouncil to icier; t:biii; hc:c3rings
i die Amendment and to Vm c all opportunih. for park users to het:on,e proactibe wjth the City
l t�unctl and Parks C ot��mtssion to dedelop a plan that would jmprMe the park for all users.
NANIF (,Pleas(! print) ADDRESS PHONE
E-MAIL
INITIAL
K DATE
4
PETITION
I o: hhe Medina Citv Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 1.24. Public Parks ("the Ord inance"j
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the ( ommission") has. by memorandum
dated April 28. 2004 ("the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dons
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at Lill t irnes; and
V HI-REAS We, the Undersigned. dispute the intormation stated n the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contraryto the airns and objectiles of the Park. is
umiccessary and unsound: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendmen: and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that mayexist and to avoid contr'_wersv: and
WHEREAS The Last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
IN HFIREAS The Medina City Council at its meetingon May 10. ? 04 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendmerw and
NOW T HEREhOR- We, the Undersigned. respectfully° petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would imprcvc the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE; E-MAIL INITIAL
-- -- -
--+& DATE
I I -
---
I
Y
I
ti• _ f
I
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks (`'the Ordinance")
kVf1FREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has_ by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that does
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound -,and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may he
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public epinion: and
Lk I IF'REAS The: Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MAIL
INITIAT�
& DATE
�'17Z
L�G� ��
� � SE 72ri PI•
Bel �z5'
t�-wcr WA
I
�
PETITION
To: The Medina Citv Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (-the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment') is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park. is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion- and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the t'ndersigned, respectfully petit. on the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) 1 ADDRESS PHONE T
E -MAILr
INITIAL
� I
Avf 0 - L %,
K"
i
L,
i
a
5
PETITION
To: The Medina Citv Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHERI AS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission ("the Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo'), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the information stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment (`the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We; the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may he
needed to verify the information stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions
to any problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion_ and
'A 111.1 REAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May i 0, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print)
ADDRESS
PHONE
E-MAIL
INITIAL
DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina. Parks and Recreation Commission ("th-1 Commission") has, by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the Memo"), recommended that the Ordirance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all times; and
WHEREAS We, the I Indersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989,
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
WHEREAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defier public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAH, INITIAL
& DATE
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24. Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
W I IERL AS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commission (-the Commission-) has. bt memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 (-the Memo"). recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the western part of Medina Park (`the Park") be leashed at all times: and
WHEREAS Wc. the Undersigned" dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment (-the Amendment") is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound: and
WFIF.RFAS We, the Undersigned. are opposed to the Amendmert and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to develop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy: and
WHEREAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 1989.
and we believe this survey reasonably reflects current public opinion; and
W'IIERFAS The Medina City Council at its meeting on May 10, -004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NOW' THERFFORF. We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hearings
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that vWUld improve the park for all users_
_------- - ------ ---- - - -- -- - -- - -- - r
NAME (Please print) ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL INITIAL
—._ & DATE:
I
I
i
PETITION
To: The Medina City Council
Re: Recommended Changes to MMC Chapter 12.24, Public Parks ("the Ordinance")
WHEREAS The Medina Parks and Recreation Commnission ("the Commission") has. by memorandum
dated April 28, 2004 ("the :Memo-), recommended that the Ordinance be amended to require that dogs
in the N� estern part of Medina Park ("the Park") be leashed at all -imes: and
WHEREAS We, the Undersigned, dispute the facts stated in the Memo and believe that the
recommended amendment ("the Amendment') is contrary to the aims and objectives of the Park, is
unnecessary and unsound; and
WHEREAS We, the I ndersigned. are opposed to the Amendment and believe that public input may be
needed to verify the facts stated in the Memo and to deyclop effective and inexpensive solutions to any
problems that may exist and to avoid controversy; and
WHF,REAS The last survey of public opinion with regard to use of the Park was conducted in 19S9,
and we believe this sun °ev reasonably reflects current public opinion: and
WHEREAS The Medina City Cormcil at its meeting on May 10, 2004 decided to schedule public
hearings on the Amendment; and
NO'W THEREFORE We, the Undersigned, respectfully petition the Council to defer public hcarin"s
on the Amendment and to give an opportunity for park users to become proactive with the City
Council and Parks Commission to develop a plan that would improve the park for all users.
NAME (Please print) � ADDRESS PHONE E.-MAIL INITIAL
& DATE
I
FRO in ".'4 FABOAmmly Ex`-A;l Off-l.a,anh Pabcov: tar Mina Park
owns
I .
00 70 r!
no y; r
A�q
Wo
j -ne- on; Inc
o'l
2221 Evergreen Point Road
Medina. Washington 98039
July 8, 2004
Medina City Council
City Hall
501 Evergreen Point Road
Medina, Washington 98039
Re: In Support of Maintaining Existing Off -Leash Policies for Medina Park
Ladies and Gentlemen.
My name is Wady Milner. I live at 2221 Evergreen Point Road. I am the mother of a twelve month old
boy and the owner of two dogs.
I am aware of the arguments that have been made in favor of restricting dogs in Medina Park, but feel
that it is important for the members of the park board and the city council also to hear from those of us
who love the park as it is — for the joy that it brings to our children, for the sense of community that it
instills in our families, and for the freedom that it provides our dogs to romp. Like the city of Medina
itself, Medina Park is truly a unique treasure.
Prior to attending last month's city council meeting, I read the list of complaints made against dogs in
Medina Park. Among those complaints was a blanket statement to the effect that, because of off -leash
dogs, families with young children cannot enjoy Medina Park. While I cannot purport to speak on
behalf of all families with young children who have visited Medina Park, I can tell you that, with respect
to my family, this statement is emphatically untrue. My son's greatest joy is found in meandering about
the park. We visit the park every day and, for those of you who have happened upon us, I am certain
that you have seen my son squawking in delight as his dogs wrestle and tumble with one another or
meet up and frolic with other dogs in the park.
The delight that my son experiences at the park is matched by the gratitude that my husband and I feel
for the friendships that we have developed during our visits to Medina Park with our dogs. When we
initially moved to Medina childless and dogless in 1998, we had difficulty meeting our neighbors. After
two years, we had developed a casual acquaintance only with the family directly across the street and
the neighbor on the adjacent property. Then, in the summer of 2000, we adopted our first dog whom
we began bringing to Medina Park and suddenly we began to feel like part of a community. We were
embraced by the other dog owners at Medina Park who were always (the only ones) there to share a
6A5 a.m. stroll with my husband before work or, since I have been at home with my son, a mid-
morning walk around the pond I will be forever thankful to another Medina mother and dog owner
whom I met at Medina Park when my son was a newborn. During our walks around the park with our
dogs and children, she provided much -needed support and sleeping tips that helped get me through
the challenges of new motherhood. As a result of our time spent with our dogs at Medina Park, my
husband and I now count among our friends neighbors in their 70s, other parents with young children
(with and without dogs), and an assortment of young professionals, retirees, and other individuals from
all walks of life who share a common bond of a love of animals and an appreciation of the beauty and
tranquility of Medina Park.
I visit Medina Park five days a week and my husband is there on the other two days. During our time at
the park, we have not witnessed dog fights, dogs urinating on children, or the mounds of dog waste
cited in the park board documents. At a minimum, in order to ensure the validity of the process, the city
council should verify and quantify these assertions prior to enacting the proposed regulation
July 8. 2004
• Page 2
It would be a shame to divide Medina Park and to limit its usage for patrons with dogs as, on most days
and at most times of the year, the only people who use the park area small handful of dog owners. As
mentioned previously, my husband and I visit Medina Park with our son and two dogs nearly every day
of the year. During the vast majority of those visits, we share the park with only one or two others who
are hey are created to be used by thpublic If
the ityrfth their dogs, Parks are t
council approves the proposedrestrictions museum pieces — t
on park use, during most of they year, half of Medina
Park will simply not be used.
The argument being made for division of Medina Park appears to be one of equity — that is, the park
should be regulated in order to ensure that it may be enjoyed by patrons both with and without dogs.
However, when considering this argument. the city council should examine the Medina park system as
a whole. Dogs are prohibited at Medina Beach Park year round, whether or not they are on leash (it
should be noted that many other beach parks on the Eastside permit dogs from September through
June, when park usage would otherwise be minimal). Although not posted, I believe that the grassy
area of Fairweather Park requires that dogs be leashed. Both of these parks provide ample opportunity
for Medina residents and others in the area to enjoy the outdoor experience without fear of harassment
by dogs. In addition, Medina Elementary offers many fabulous, dog -free children's play areas.
I understand the desire for compromise in order to ensure that the parks may be enjoyed by a diverse
group of patrons. However, it is important that any such compromise be in accordance with the wishes
of the citizens of Medina and the surrounding communities who utilize these parks. The compromise
should not be based on unverified allegations from unidentified sources, which, to my knowledge, have
not been quantified to determine whether they represent more than a small minority of park users.
Finally, if a compromise is in fact warranted based on public support and verified facts, it is important
that any such compromise not be unnecessarily broad. Prior to approving the proposed amendment
the city council should take the time to study usage patterns at Medina Park. If Medina Park will be
used only (or primarily) by dog owners from September through June. then it does not make sense to
impose the proposed restrictions during those months. Similarly, even in the summer months, if young
children and picnickers are not using the park prior to 9:00 a.m. (when many dog owners choose to
exercise their pets before going to work) or in the evenings after dinner time, the restrictions should not
be in place. To decide otherwise will result in a park that, while beautiful and pristine, will stand empty
much of the time and thus will not serve the purpose for which it was created.
Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 425-
462-1971.
Sincerely,
Z64-Ot
Wady H. Milner
cc: ShelJahn