HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-11-2005 - Agenda Packet•
•
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
April 11, 2005 7:00 p.m.
501 Evergreen Point Road Medina, WA
A. CALL TO ORDER
7:00 p.m.
B. ROLL CALL (Adam, Blazey, Nunn, Odermat, Phelps, Rudolph, Vail-Spinosa)
C. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
D. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS
E. ANNOUNCEMENTS
1. Mayor
2. Council
3. Staff
F. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Minutes from March 14, 2005 Council Meeting
2. Approval of March 2005 Checks/Finance Officer's Report
G. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
1. Non -Agenda Items (3 minutes per person)
H. REPORTS
1. Police Department
2. Development Services
3. Public Works Department
4. Emergency Management Committee
5. Park Board
6. City Manager's Report
Meeting Agenda is subject to change prior to approval of the agenda during the meeting.
Persons interested in a specific agenda item may wish to call the City Clerk at
(425) 454-9222 before 4:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting to confirm agenda items.
I. PUBLIC HEARING
1. Site Plan Review
•
J. OTHER BUSINESS
1. Budget Amendments (K-9 & 501h Anniversary)
2. Citizen Survey
3. Medina Beach Park Project
4. Council Agenda Calendar
K. NEW BUSINESS
L. EXECUTIVE SESSION
M. ADJOURNMENT
•
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The Medina City Council encourages public participation and values input from citizens.
In an effort to conduct meetings in a fair, but efficient manner, the City Council will follow
previously adopted procedures, which are available in the City Clerk's Office.
All comments shall be addressed to the Council as a whole in a courteous and respectful
manner. Derogatory comments directed toward individual members of the City Council or
City staff will not be permitted.
Citizens wishing to address the Council should complete a speaker card and submit it to
the recording secretary prior to the start of the meeting. Speaker cards are on the podium
prior to the start of the City Council meetings.
•
ITEM F-1
•
•
•
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
March 14, 2005
7:00 pm
CALL TO ORDER
Medina City Hall
501 Evergreen Point Road
Mayor Odermat called the March 14, 2005, meeting of the Medina City Council to order,
7:02 pm.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Mary Odermat, Deputy Mayor Todd Nunn
Council members Miles Adam, Drew Blazey (arrived 7:05), Katie Phelps, Bob Rudolph,
and Pete Vall-Spinosa
Citv Staff Present: Douglas Schulze, City Manager; Vicki Orrico and Scott Snyder,
Ogden Murphy Wallace; Jeff Chen, Chief of Police; Joseph Gellings, Director of
Development Services, Joe Willis, Interim Director of Public Works; and Rachel Baker,
Administrative Assistant
Consultants:
Dan Nickel, The Watershed Company
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor (7: 02 pm)
Odermat announced:
• Vicki Orrico, Assistant City Attorney from Ogden Murphy Wallace, would attend
meeting during absence of City Attorney, Wayne Tanaka
• The Suburban Cities Association, Public Issues Committee meets March 16t" at
7:00 pm and would be preceded by the Small Cities Caucus at 6:00 pm at
Renton City Hall
• The Water Resource Inventory Area 8 (WRIA 8) Forum meets March 17t", from
3:30 to 5:30 pm, at Heritage Hall in Kirkland
• The Puget Sound Regional Council (PRSC), Annual General Assembly will be
March 24t", from 3:30 to 5:30 pm at the Westin Hotel in Seattle
• The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) project website
has posted five discipline reports for the State Route 520 Bridge Replacement
and HOV Project. Other project descriptions and information can be found on the
website. The draft Environmental Impact Statement is expected to become
available either late spring early summer.
•
9
Council
No announcements.
Staff (7:04 pm)
Schulze announced:
• Court of Appeals, oral arguments in Larkin versus City of Medina (Medina Store
appeal) scheduled for April 21, 2005, at 9:30 am, and will be held at the
University of Washington School of Law, and will be open to the public
• Paulman versus City of Medina (Public Disclosure Act) was heard in King County
Superior Court; Court ruled in favor of the City
CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION RUDOLPH, SECOND PHELPS TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:
• Minutes from February 14, 2005 City Council Meeting
• Minutes from February 28, 2005 Study Session
• Approval of February 2005 Checks/Finance Officer's Report
• Adoption of 2005 Update to Medina Comprehensive Plan
MOTION PASSED 7-0, 7:10 PM.
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
(Non -Agenda Items)
Jim Lawrence, 822 Evergreen Point Road, Medina (7:11 pm)
Lawrence suggested city staff re -review mitigation level determination for Medina Store
due to concerns regarding basement square footage and quantities of dirt to be moved.
Lawrence requested council consider limiting basement size and building use.
Mariam Naini, 1012 Evergreen Point Road, Medina (7:17 pm)
Naini urged councilmembers consider crime prevention a priority and ensure funding
and support would be available to the police force.
John Dernpalmer, 1600 - 77'u' Avenue Northeast, Medina (7:18 pm)
Dernpalmer spoke to the consideration of a K-9 Unit in Medina; following Council
discussion he was asked to relinquish the microphone, as it would be an agenda topic.
City Council Minutes
Page 2
March 14, 2005
0 Paul Saad, 7644 Northeast Eighth Street, Medina (7:22 pm)
Saad distributed documents supporting his position regarding the Medina Store and
stated he does not currently support the project. Saad expressed concern regarding
plans developed for the east end of second story, including, hip roof versus shed roof,
large amount of storage space and potential use of store. Saad asked council to
analyze inconsistencies, since potential project costs and cubic yards excavated would
require level two mitigation.
John Dernpalmer, 1600 - 7r Avenue Northeast, Medina (7:27 pm)
Dernpalmer quoted figures associated with ownership of Green Store property and said
he previously attended a meeting with the property owner and suggested council be
wary owner's trust.
Gerry Zyfers, 7604 Northeast Eighth Street, Medina (7:29 pm)
Zyfers commented regarding his concerns about store usage and suggested limiting the
physical presence of the store, such as number of doors planned; and suggested
council consider limiting the number of entrances on the east end of the building and
building use.
Mayor informally polled audience, and with Council's consent, declared Other Business
item, Consideration to Accept Gift of K 9 Unit to the Medina Police Department, be
moved to the top of meeting agenda, following Reports, due to number of residents in
attendance for topic item (7:22 pm).
REPORTS
Police Department (7:40 pm)
Chen answered Council inquiry regarding Police Department staff levels and crime
activity report.
Rudolph suggested department research feasibility of installing cameras at entrances
into Medina to monitor entrances and exits from City. Chen indicated the Hunts Point
Town Council has begun to seriously consider camera installation in their town.
Rudolph volunteered to assist Chen with request.
Development Services (7:46 pm)
Gellings provided costs and revenues associated with administration of the tree code
and answered council inquiries regarding review requirements and appeal process.
City Council Minutes March 14, 2005
Page 3
Public Works Department (7:56 pm)
Willis summarized dumpster relocation proposal and noted maintenance crew has been
busy performing general maintenance in the city.
City Manager (7:58 pm)
Schulze answered inquiries from Adam regarding resident facilitated on-line discussion
group. Orrico conveyed her firm could provide the city with disclaimer language
regarding the on-line discussion group.
OTHER BUSINESS
Consideration to Accept Gift of K-9 Unit to Medina Police Department (8:02 pm)
Schulze stated the City has received an offer of a donation for start-up costs associated
with a K-9 Unit (canine and handler) and recommended Council discuss and take action
whether to accept gift due to financial implications involved.
Mayor opened floor to public participation (8:04 pm).
Steve Brustkern, 2012 77th Avenue Northeast, Medina (8:04 pm)
Brustkern introduced Faye, a guide dog in training, and stated he is currently a 13-year
Medina resident, but previously resided in small communities with K-9 Units. Residents
of those communities appreciated K-9 Units and highly recommended gift acceptance.
John Dernpalmer, 1600 - 77th Avenue Northeast, Medina (8:05 pm)
Dernpalmer expressed Medina has needed a K-9 unit in the community for some time
and further commented on a canine's ability to help police and protect residents.
Scott Hannah, Emergency Preparedness Chair, (8:07 pm)
Hannah, a 17-year Medina resident, recommended acceptance of the gift. Hannah
stressed the importance of having a canine in the community, which would serve as a
dual-purpose asset for both emergency services and community safety and security.
Bob Buote 1810 — 73`d Avenue Northeast, Medina (8:11 pm)
Buote, Director of Security for Gates Estate in Medina, spoke as both a resident and on
behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Gates in support of the proposal. Buote expressed a K-9 Unit
would provide a significant enhancement for the safety and security of Medina citizens
and police officers. He stated the department's quality of service would be enhanced
and its capabilities would be improved with employment of K-9 Unit.
City Council Minutes March 14, 2005
Page 4
I•
Jim Arata, Medina (8: 13 pm)
Arata, Medina resident and sergeant with the Seattle Police Department, spoke in
support of proposal, stating it would be an invaluable tool and is needed in Medina.
Arata conveyed the department has a responsibility to provide a professional response
to residents and requires a resource such as a K-9 unit to serve the community. He
further stressed the importance of accepting responsibility to nurture and encourage
public donations. Resident declared willingness to speak and discuss topic further with
others that may have questions.
Bruce McCaw, Medina (8: 9 7 pm)
Ten-year Medina resident concerned about uprising of residential issues in the city and
declared support for proposal. McCaw expressed how K-9 Unit would enhance
department's abilities and effectiveness to protect and support the safety of residents
and officers.
Fred McConkey, Mayor, Town of Hunts Point (8: 19 pm)
McConkey conveyed Hunts Point town council and residents appreciate the relationship
sharing services with Medina, including the police department, and strongly support
addition of K-9 Unit. McConkey requested determination of town's portion of the
16 expense and expressed appreciation of donation. McConkey discussed town's camera
installation project and indicated the camera would be operational in a couple of months
and would connect to Kirkland dispatch.
•
Jeri Boettcher, Town Council, Town of Hunts Point (8:20 pm)
Concurred with Mayor McConkey.
Mayor closed floor to public comment, 8:21 pm.
Chen credited Officer Julie Wight for creation of the proposal and Officer Dan Yourkoski
for assistance with the proposal. Chen answered council inquiry and discussion
followed.
Schulze indicated a budget amendment could be presented at the April 11, 2005 City
Council meeting.
MOTION NUNN, SECOND RUDOLOPH, TO AUTHORIZE ACCEPTANCE OF GIFT FOR K-9
UNIT TO MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT, MOTION PASSED 4-3, ADAM, BLAZEY AND
VALL-SPINOSA OPPOSED, 9:23 PM.
City Council Minutes March 14, 2005
Page 5
Mayor declared recess, 9:23 pm and meeting reconvened, 9:34 pm. During break,
Assistant City Attorney, Vicki Orrico, left meeting. Scott Snyder, associate attorney,
Ogden Murphy Wallace, attended on Orrico's behalf.
Odermat announced item, Consideration of Code Enforcement and Public Works
Interlocal Agreements with Towns of Hunts Point and Yarrow Point, would be pulled
from discussion, however, Town of Hunt's Point Mayor, Fred McConkey, would address
Council prior to Public Hearing.
Consideration of Code Enforcement and Public Works Interlocal Agreements with
Towns of Hunts Point and Yarrow Point (9:34 pm)
Schulze stated the Mayor of Yarrow Point informed him Yarrow Point would not consider
the interlocal agreement with Medina.
McConkey expressed Hunt's Point would not be interested in the temporary agreement
proposed by Council, but would consider a future agreement, if permanent and full -
service in nature. McConkey stated Hunt's Point would like to continue coordination of
Willis's service with Medina until completion of Hunt's Point Road.
PUBLIC HEARING
Critical Areas Ordinance (9:39 pm)
Gellings provided history of ordinance requirement and recommended ordinance
adoption as presented in council packet.
Following discussion, Mayor opened floor to public comment, 9:46 pm.
Anthony Pagones, 2643 Evergreen Point Road, Medina (9:46 pm)
Property owner indicated his architect currently in middle of the design phase for beach
house construction, as allowed under current zoning regulations, and suggested council
adopt the ordinance with an effective date of 60-days from adoption to ensure he could
complete a proper submittal.
Franz Lazarus, 2651 Evergreen Point Road (9:47 pm)
Resident described property and conveyed he has not yet begun the redevelopment
process, but indicated a six-month delay in ordinance adoption would provide adequate
time to begin process and inclusion in vesting rules. Property owner declared ordinance
unfair, as it deprives homeowners unable to develop within the next 30-60 days, and
ISdevalues properties.
City Council Minutes March 14, 2005
Page 6
•
Mayor closed floor to comment, 9:49 pm.
Discussion followed.
MOTION VALL-SPINOSA, SECOND ADAM, TO ADOPT 2005 AMENDMENTS TO THE
CRITICAL AREAS ORDINACE AS RECOMMENDED BY MEDINA PLANNING
COMMISSION, WITH CHANGE TO SECTION THREE, AMENDING EFFECTIVE DATE
60-DAYS AFTER PASSAGE, MOTION PASSED 5-2, BLAZEY AND NUNN OPPOSED,
10:13 PM.
OTHER BUSINESS
Consideration of Event Planner for 501" Anniversary Celebration (10:14 pm)
Phelps summarized proposal from The Green Door Event Planners, which was
distributed during previous City Council meeting, and suggested events selected from
proposal and associated cost estimates.
Schulze conveyed staff assistance would be provided to coordinate event with the event
planners. Schulze indicated a budget amendment could be placed on the April 11, 2005
Consent Agenda.
BY CONSENSUS, COUNCIL AGREED TO AUTHORIZE EVENT PLANNER AND A
BUDGET NOT TO EXCEED $25,000, 10:32 PM.
Review of Consultant Qualifications for Public Opinion Survey (10:34 pm)
Councilmembers Nunn and Adam volunteered to review consultant qualifications with
Schulze and provide opinions. Council agreed Schulze would determine finalist.
Council Agenda Calendar (10:39 pm)
During discussion, it was determined a quorum would not be available for the March 28,
2005 Study Session and the meeting was cancelled.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Odermat adjourned the regular meeting into Executive Session. Schulze announced
the Executive Session would be approximately thirty minutes and discussion would
encompass labor negotiations and no action was anticipated (10:47 pm).
City Council Minutes March 14, 2005
Page 7
•
•
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION NUNN, SECOND BLAZEY, TO ADJOURN, MOTION PASSED WITH ALL IN
FAVOR, 11:25 PM.
The March 14, 2005 regular meeting of the Medina City Council adjourned, 11:25 pm.
Due to absence of a quorum for March 28, 2005 Study Session, the meeting will be
canceled. The next City Council meeting will be held Monday, April 11, 2005, 7:00 pm.
Mayor Mary Odermat
Attest:
Rachel Baker, Administrative Assistant
City Council Minutes
Page 8
March 14, 2005
•
�F
CITY OF MEDINA
Memorandum
DATE: April 1.1, 2005
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jan Burdue, CPFA
RE: Finance Report — March 2005
General Fund
I* Revenues
•
COMMENT:
Item F=2
➢ Sales and Use Tax is below the budget projections for this time of year by
$78,124.
➢ Building Permits are $45,648 above the budget projections for this time of
year.
➢ Investment Interest exceeds the budget projections for the year by $13,995.
➢ Payment for the Police Contract with Hunts Point was received for the second half of
2004 in February 2005.
➢ Passports are $2,320 above budget projections for this time of year.
Expenditures
Departmental expenditures are meeting budget projections.
►7a
OO
N
.,.,
"114
M
z�16m
A
�
�
W
.L�
O
O
W
h
�
c
cu
0
.S
Pk
;To
10
M
O
.--4
O
W')
m
'Itt
O
co
N
10
00
V- 4
O
M
r-+
en
r-.
N
00
M
Cf)
N
Un
M
CT
tn
O
M
el�
IleM
O
St
r-
io
C1
to
Gti
00
r-
00
[�
PC
•--�
'-•
t
C
'C
C�
bA
bA
f.,
�
O
E"q
bH
N
'
00
00
00
�O
00
O
M
v
N
N
�
W
bf-?
bl4
y
44
it
F
�
�
00
,
,
i
i
N
�O
r-•
O
00
N
r
Ne
M
Clf
�
10
N
N
ai
bR
bl9
N
v�
N
O
,n
cM
tn
t�
n
o0
en
00
V-4
N
t
00
r+
M
M
O
N
N
N
�o
O�
�O
'd'
C'�
N
M
N
0000
000
b9
big
E-y
h
O
�
apr
O
a
1�1
w
a
��
H
4
W
0-4
z
H
O
N
•-'
O
NCD
O
N
It
M
l�
69
b9
�
a
d
O
E+
O
a
H
d
�
U
U
M
O
•-+
O
110
d'
O
h M 0
O
N
�o
00
M
M
en
irj
•-^
N
00
en
M
N
Vl
M
OA
ON
O
O
M
M
%
(0
�
�
N
V 00 N
V N
00
V
�--�
[ -
00
�
d� M h
C R
M
W
V
� L
R!
(604
tog
f!4 bR
O
t
,
L A
w E�
H
it
C�
L
C^
604en
69
M
1
y
kn
h
G1
h
ON
M
M
�o
V
N
N
N
O
V
00
Er-
00
as
a
a
W
6
604
en
O
t
'
00
O
O
M
O
O
a N
"' ��
en
—
b
M
b
b
•
h
h
M
M
4
+;
5{
�
fps
�s
Z
�
601�
V4
O
C^
M
M
N
a
V'1
er
Q�
•-i
O
o
a �
W
614
69
6g
O
O
O�
M
Q\
M
N
CDN
00
00
O\
O
h
tn N h
C
r
V
M
t!1
N
�o
N
O N N
06
V
O
cM
p p r+
O
N
C\
C ea >1
Zcc
d'
H
ti
z
AA
O
O
O
a"
p"
x
a
a
z
O
>
U
z
w
w
H
a
U
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
I* GENERAL FUND
City of Medina
MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT
March 31, LOOS PAGE 1
M.T.D. Y.T.D. !k OF REMAINING
RECEIPTS RECEIPTS ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPECTATION
PROPERTY & SALES TAX
001 000 000 311 10 00 00 General Property Taxes
001 000 000 311 10 00 01 Gen'l Prop Taxes - Ad Valorem
001 000 000 313 10 00 00 Local Retail Sales & Use Tax
001 000 000 313 71 00 00 Criminal Justice Funding
TOTAL PROPERTY & SALES TAX
LICENSES & PERMITS
001 000 000 322 10 00 00 Building Permits
001 000 000 322 30 00 00 Animal Licenses
001 000 000 322 90 00 00 Gun Permits
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
001 000 000 331 17 20 00 Fed11 Grant -Emergency Vehicle
001 000 000 334 03 50 00 State Grant -Traffic Safety Com
001 000 000 336 06 21 00 MVET-Criminal Justice -Pop.
001 000 000 336 06 26 00 Criminal Justice -Special
001 000 000 336 06 51 00 DUI/Other Criminal Justice
001 000 000 336 06 94 00 Liquor Excise Tax
001 000 900 336 06 95 00 Liquor Control Board Profits
001 000 000 338 21 00 00 Hunts Point Police Contract
001 000 000 338 23 00 00 Detention/Correction-Jail
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
CHGS FOR GOODS AND SERVICES
001 000 000 341 50 00 00 Maps and Publications
001 000 000 341 69 00 00 Copies and Reports
001 000 000 341 70 00 00 Merchandise - CD's
000 000 341 99 00 00 Passport & Naturalization Fees
000 000 342 10 00 00 Law Enforcement Services
000 000 342 37 00 00 Fingerprinting
001 000 000 347 60 00 00 Program Fees
TOTAL CHGS FOR GOODS/SERVICES
FINES & FORFEITURES
001 000 000 353 10 00 00 Municipal Court -Traffic In€rac
TOTAL FINES & FORFEITURES
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
001 000 000 361 it 00 00 Investment Interest
001 000 000 361 40 00 00 Sales Interest
001 000 000 363 00 00 00 Insurance Recoveries
001 000 000 367 11 00 00 Contributions/Donations-K9
001 000 000 369 30 00 00 Confiscated/Forfeited Property
001 000 000 369 81 00 00 Petty Cash - Overage/Shortages
001 000 000 369 90 00 00 Other
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
56,406.74
77,029.23
2,101,417.00
3.67
2,024,387.77
.00
1,053.94-
.00
.00
1,053.94
37,832.44
171,876.46
1,000,000.00
17.19
828,123.54
4,398.42
15,306.59
50,000.00
30.61
34,693.41
98,637.60
263,158.34
3,151,417.00
8.35
2,888,258.66
49,079.65
195,648.40
600,000.00
32.61
404,351.60
62.00
224.00
1,000.00
22.40
776.00
298.41
330.41
.00
.00
330.41-
49,440.06
196,202.81
601,000.00
32.65
404,797.19
.00
.00
108,800.00
.00
108,800.00
.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
1,000.00-
.00
250.00
650.00
38.46
400.00
.00
538.17
2,175.00
24.74
1,636.83
.00
123.78
500.00
24.76
376.22
.00
2,915.56
11,622.00
25.09
8,706.44
5,512.15
5,512.15
21,754.00
25.34
16,241.85
.00
69,000.00
138,000.00
50.00
69,000.00
.00
60.00
.00
.00
60.00-
5,512.15
79,399.66
283,501.00
28.01
204,101.34
.00
57.00
.00
.00
57.00-
161.65
410.29
.00
.00
410.29-
.00
15.00
.00
.00
15.00-
960.00
3,570.00
5,000.00
71.40
1,430.00
250.00
250.00
.00
.00
250.00-
.00
18.00
.00
.00
18.00-
.00
.00
1,600.00
.00
1,600.00
1,371.65
4,320.29
6,600.00
65.46
2,279.71
5,168.85
13,711.88
125,000.00
10.97
111,288.12
5,168.85
13,711.88
125,000.00
10.97
111,288.12
9,670.92
26,495.76
50,000.00
52.99
23,504.24
137.62
354.72
.00
.00
354.72-
.00
1,501.10
.00
.00
1,501.10-
200.00
200.00
.00
.00
200.00-
595.32
595.32
.00
.00
595.32-
10.04-
10.04-
.00
.00
10.04
39.69
61.69
.00
.00
61.69-
10,633.51
29,198.55
50,000.00
58.40
20,801.45
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
0 NONREVENUES
000 000 389 00 00 00 Other Non -Revenues (pass
0G1 000 000 389 00 00 10 Attorney
001 000 000 389 00 00 20 Building Inspector
001 000 000 389 00 00 30 Building Official
001 000 000 389 00 00 50 Engineer
001 000 000 389 00 00 60 Landscape Architect
001 000 000 389 00 00 70 Planner
TOTAL NONREVENUES
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
lie
10
City of Medina
MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D.
RECEIPTS
thru) .00
.00
2,080.50
10,146.90
8,619.97
6479.21
4:117.40
31,443.98
Y.T.D.
RECEIPTS
ESTIMATED
.00
195,000.00
970.00
.00
5,900.99
.00
21,296.79
.00
22,205.01
.00
20,076.77
.00
8,624.77
.00
79,074.33
195,000.00
PAGE 2
OF
REMAINING
TOTAL
EXPECTATION
.00
195,000.00
.00
970.00-
.00
5,900.99-
.00
21,296.79-
.00
22,205.01-
.00
20,076.77-
.00
8,624.77-
40.55
115,925.67
202,207.80 665,065.86 4,412,518.00 15.07 3,747,452.14
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
I*
GENERAL FUND
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D. % OF
EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED TOTAL
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
001 000 000 511 60 41 10 Prof Serv-SR520 Mitigation
001 000 000 511 60 41 20 Prof Serv-Jet Noise Mitigation
001 000 000 511 60 43 00 Travel & Training
001 000 000 511 60 49 00 Miscellaneous
001 000 000 511 80 51 00 Elections Serv-Voter Reg Costs
TOTAL LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
I I*
•
PAGE 1
UNEXPENDED
BALANCE
.00
.00
10,000.00
.00
10,000.00
.00
.00
10,000.00
.00
10,000.00
.00
95.00
5,000.00
1.90
4,905.00
480.90
480.90
.00
.00
480.90-
.00
4,070.80
6,000.00
67.85
1,929.20
480.90
4,646.70
31,000.00
14.99
26,353.30
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
I*
MUNICIPAL COURT
001 000 000 512 50 41 10 Prosecuting Attorney
001 000 000 512 50 41 20 Public Defender
001 000 000 512 50 41 30 Expert Witness
001 000 000 512 50 51 10 Municipal Court-Traffic/NonTrf
TOTAL MUNICIPAL COURT
•
PAGE 2
OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
2,783.78
5,819.49
45,000.00
12.93
39,180.51
435.00
435.00
8,000.00
5.44
7,565.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.00
1,000.00
.00
1,573.00
85,000.00
1.85
83,427.00
3,218.78
7,827.49
139,000.00
5.63
131,172.51
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
EXECUTIVE
SALARIES & WAGES
001 000 000 513 10 11 00
Salaries & Wages
TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES
PERSONNEL BENEFITS
001 000 000 513 10 21 00
Personnel Benefits
TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS
OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES
001 000 000 513 10 35 00
Small Tools/Minor Equipment
001 000 000 513 10 43 00
Travel & Training
001 000 000 513 10 49 00
Miscellaneous
001 000 000 513 10 49 01
Dues, Subsc, Auto Allowance
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
TOTAL EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
lie
8,016.33
8,016.33
1,900.38
1,900.38
.00
.00
32.25
250.00
282.25
10,198.96
24,048.99
101,500.00
24,048.99
101,500.00
5,695.52
23,050.00
5,695.52
23,050.00
.00
500.00
290.91
4,000.00
60.70
4,500.00
1,071.00
3,100.00
1,422.61
12,100.00
31,167.12 136,650.00
PAGE 3
$ OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
23.69
77,451.01
23.69
77,451.01
24.71
17,354.48
24.71 '`'"
17,354.48
.00
500.00
7.27
3,709.09
1.35
4,439.30
34.55
2,029.00
11.76
10,677.39
22.81 105,482.88
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
SALARIES & WAGES
001 000 000 514 10 it 00
Salaries & Wages
TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES
PERSONNEL BENEFITS
001 000 000 514 10 21 00
Personnel Benefits
TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
001 000 000 514 10 43 00
Travel & Training
001 000 000 514 10 49 00
Misc-Dues,Subscriptions
001 000 000 514 10 51 00
Intergvtml Prof Serv-Auditors
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT
lie
•
PAGE 4
OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
4,982.70
14,948.10
59,280.00
25.22
44,331.90
4,982.70
14,948.10
59,280.00
25.22
44,331.90
948.83
2,841.94
11,220.00
25.33
8,378.06
948.83
2,841.94
11,220.00
25.33
8,378.06
130.00
181.72
3,500.00
5.19
3,318.28
.00
105.00
750.00
14.00
645.00
.00
.00
8,500.00
.00
8,500.00
130.00
286.72
12,750.00
2.25
12,463.28
6,061.53
18,076.76
83,250.00
21.71
65,173.24
ACCOUNT NUMBER
I*
001 000 000 515 20 41 10
001 000 000 515 20 41 60
•
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
PAGE 5
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
% OF
UNEXPENDED
DESCRIPTION
EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATED
TOTAL
BALANCE
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
City Attorney
7,779.15 19,343.22
110,000.00
17.58
90,656.78
Special Counsel
.00 .00
25,000.00
.00
25,000.00
TOTAL LEGAL DEPARTMENT
7,779.15 19,343.22
135,000.00
14.33
115,656.78
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March
31, 2005
PAGE 6
M.T.D.
Y.T.D.
OF
UNEXPENDED
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATED
TOTAL
BALANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES
SALARIES & WAGES
001
000
000
518
10
11
00
Salaries & Wages
8,723.63
30,438.67
149,280.00
20.39
118,841.33
001
000
000
518
10
12
00
Overtime
.00
.00
500.00
.00
500.00
TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES
8,723.63
30,438.67
149,780.00
20.32
119,341.33
PERSONNEL BENEFITS
001
000
000
518
10
21
00
Personnel Benefits
3,591.23
11,164.80
46,360.00
24.08
35,195.20
TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS
3,591.23
11,164.80
46,360.00
24.08
35,195.20
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
001
000
000
518
10
31
00
Office and Operating Supplies
1,179.91
3,278.62
20,000.00
16.39
16,721.38
001
000
000
518
10
41
00
Professional Services
30.00
2,115.11
12,000.00
17.63
9,884.89
001
000
000
518
10
42
00
Postage/Telephone
1,820.61
4,760.88
21,000.00
22.67
16,239.12
001
000
000
518
10
43
00
Travel & Training
850.00
1,253.64
3,500.00
35.82
2,246.36
001
000
000
518
10
44
00
Advertising
279.85
373.85
8,000.00
4.67
7,626.15
001
000
000
518
10
46
00
Insurance (WCIA)
.00
80,903.00
75,764.00
106.78
5,139.00-
001
000
000
518
10
47
00
Utility Serv-Elec,Water,Waste
470.26
1,493.53
9,000.00
16.59
7,506.47
001
000
000
518
10
49
10
Miscellaneous
466.01
862.99
2,800.00
30.82
1,937.01
001
000
000
518
10
49
20
Dues, Subscriptions
.00
252.94
950.00
26.63
697.06
001
000
000
518
10
49
30
Newsletter
519.31
6,556.65
20,000.00
32.78
13,443.35
001
000
000
518
10
49
40
Photocopies
9.79
163.34
2,500.00
6.53
2,336.66
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
5,625.74
102,014.55
175,514.00
58.12
73,499.45
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
001
000
000
518
30
45
00
Facility Rental
485.48
1,207.96
7,800.00
15.49
6,592.04
001
000
000
518
30
48
00
Repairs/Maint-City Hall Bldg
1,731.79
3,935.30
15,000.00
26.24
11,064.70
TOTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE
2,217.27
5,143.26
22,800.00
22.56
17,656.74
SUBTOTAL CENTRAL SERVICES
20,157.87
148,761.28
394,454.00
37.71
245,692.72
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March
31, ZOOS
PAGE 7
M.T.D.
Y.T.D.
OF
UNEXPENDED
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATED
TOTAL
BALANCE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
000
000
518
90
41
50
Technical Services
6,387.54
9,237.54
20,000.00
46.19
10,762.46
001
000
000
518
90
48
00
Repairs & Main -Equipment
2,895.23
14,809.80
50,000.00
29.62
35,190.20
TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
9,282.77
24,047.34
70,000.00
34.35
45,952.66
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES
001
000
000
519
90
49
00
Association of WA Cities
.00
1,219.58
1,219.58
100.00
.00
001
000
000
519
90
49
01
Puget Sound Regional Council
.00
.00
450.00
.00
450.00
001
000
000
519
90
49
02
Suburban Cities Association
.00
1,352.24
2,000.00
67.61
647.76
001
000
000
519
90
49
03
ARCH
2,137.00
2,137.00
12,400.00
17.23
10,263.00
001
000
000
519
90
49
04
Eastside Transportation Prog.
.00
100.00
125.00
80.00
25.00
001
000
000
519
90
49
06
Eastside Domestic Violence
.00
.00
1,700.00
.00
1,700.00
001
000
000
519
90
49
07
Bellevue Highland Center
.00
.00
1,700.00
.00
1,700.00
001
000
000
519
90
51
10
King County Health Services
.00
.00
175.00
.00
175.00
001
000
000
519
90
51
20
Puget Sound Clean Air Agency
.00
4,684.00
4,684.00
100.00
.00
001
000
000
519
90
51
30
King County Alcohol Control
170.11
170.11
467.00
36.43
296.89
001
000
000
519
90
51
40
King County Water & Land Resou
.00
.00
2,472.00
.00
2,472.00
001
000
000
519
90
51
60
WA St Purchasing & Contract
.00
500.00
.00
.00
500.00-
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
2,307.11
10,162.93
27,392.58
37.10
17,229.65
TOTAL CENTRAL SERVICES
31,747.75
182,971.55
491,846.58
37.20
308,875.03
C�
•
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
IsPOLICE DEPARTMENT
SALARIES & WAGES
001 000 000 521 20 11 00
Salaries & Wages
001 000 000 521 20 12 00
Overtime
001 000 000 521 20 12 01
Merit Pay
001 000 000 521 20 13 00
Holiday Pay
TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES
PERSONNEL BENEFITS
001 000 000 521 20 21 00
Personnel Benefits
001 000 000 521 20 22 00
Uniforms
OC1 000 000 521 20 23 00
Tuition
TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
001 000 000 521 20 31 00
Office Supplies
001 000 000 521 20 31 40
Police Operating Supplies
001 000 000 521 20 31 50
Photographic Supplies
001 000 000 521 20 31 60
Ammo/Range (Targets, etc.)
001 000 000 521 20 32 00
Vehicle Expenses(fuel,lube,etc
001 000 000 521 20 35 20
Firearms (purchase & repair)
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
001 000 000 521 20 41 00
Professional Services
001 000 000 521 20 41 50
Recruitment -Background
001 000 000 521 20 42 00
Communications (Phone,Pagers)
001 000 000 521 20 43 00
Travel & Training
001 000 000 521 20 43 01
Dues, Subscr., Memberships
001 000 000 521 20 44 50
Recruitment -Advertising
001 000 000 521 20 45 00
Equipment -Lease & Rentals
001 000 000 521 20 48 00
Repairs & Maint-Equipment
000 521 20 48 10
Repairs & Maint-Automobiles
10000
000 000 521 20 49 00
Misc. (Service/supplies)
i 000 000 521 20 49 20
Bicycle Patrol
061 000 000 521 20 49 30
Animal Control
001 000 000 521 20 49 40
Dues,Subcriptions,Memberships
001 000 000 521 20 49 60
Crime Prevention/Public Educ
001 000 000 521 20 49 90
Misc-Investigative Fund
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
r�
71,430.70
7,483.17
.00
.00
78,913.87
21,275.77
.00
.00
21,275.77
201.67
13.22
10.24
.00
1,876.55
.00
2,101.68
23.95
981.25
1,080.94
623.40
.00
.00
214.11
34.16
3,673.54
.00
.00
.00
15.00
00
.00
6,646.35
171,965.26
24,306.11
.00
.00
196,271.37
58,220.10
541.20
5,474.75
64,236.05
580.14
322.80
10.24
625.50
6,505.73
.00
8,044.41
489.85
981.25
2,895.21
1,852.85
30.00
137.50
642.33
317.98
4,333.79
5.00
.00
.00
997.50
.00
.00
12,683.26
667,686.00
70,000.00
43,592.00
21,745.00
803,023.00
181,117.00
18,000.00
10,750.00
209,867.00
5,000.00
5,600.00
500.00
6,000.00
20,000.00
1,000.00
38,100.00
9,000.00
4,000.00
14,000.00
15,000.00
.00
1,000.00
2,600.00
18,000.00
6,000.00
500.00
1,000.00
1,200.00
2,500.00
3,000.00
500.00
78,300.00
PAGE 8
4 OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
25.76
495,720.74
34.72
45,693.89
.00
43,592.00
.00
21,745.00
24.44
606,751.63
32.15
122,896.90
3.01
17,458.80
50.93
5,275.25
30.61
145,630.95
11.60
4,419.86
5.76
5,277.20
2.05
489.76
10.43
5,374.50
32.53
13,494.27
.00
1,000.00
21.11
30,055.59
5.44
8,510.15
24.53
3,018.75
20.68
11,104.79
12.35
13,147.15
.00
30.00-
13.75
862.50
24.71
1,957.67
1.77
17,682.02
72.23
1,666.21
1.00
495.00
.00
1,000.00
.00
1,200.00
39.90
1,502.50
.00
3,000.00
.00
500.00
16.20
65,616.74
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D.
Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATED
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES
001 000
000
521
20
51
10
Dispatch Services -Kirkland
.00
.00
59,731.00
001 000
000
521
20
51
20
Dispatch-EPSCA
589.26
2,132.56
6,070.00
001 000
000
521
20
51
30
Access-WSP
.00
.00
3,720.00
001 000
000
521
20
51
40
Marine Patrol -Mercer Island
.00
.00
45,000.00
001 000
000
521
20
51
50
Jail Service -Prisoner Board
1,908.83
7,763.18
33,000.00
001 000
000
521
20
51
60
Prisoner Transport
.00
.00
6,180.00
001 000
000
521
20
51
80
Domestic Violence -Kirkland
.00
.00
2,000.00
001 000
000
521
20
51
85
IT Services -Kirkland
.00
.00
15,806.00
001 000
000
521
20
51
86
WA St -Federal Surplus
.00
350.00
.00
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERV. 2,498.09
10,245.74
171,507.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY
001 000
000
521
20
64
10
Furniture & Equipment
.00
.00
1,000.00
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
.00
.00
1,000.00
TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT
111,435.76
291,480.83
1,301,797.00
I I*
•
PAGE 9
'k OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
.00
59,731.00
35.13
3,937.44
.00
3,720.00
.00
45,000.00
23.52
25,236.82
.00
6,180.00
.00
2,000.00
.00
15,806.00
.00
350.00-
5.97
161,261.26
.00
1,000.00
.00
1,000.00
22.39 1,010,316.17
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
FIRE & MEDICAL AID DEPARTMENT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES
001 000 000 522 20 51 00 Fire Control Services
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
TOTAL FIRE & MEDICAL DEPT
I•
•
.00 .00 562,679.00
.00 .00 562,679.00
.00 .00 562,679.00
PAGE 10
% OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
.00
.00
.00
562,679.00
562,679.00
562,679.00
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATED
0
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
SUPPLIES
001 000 000 525 60 31 00
Supplies
.00
.00
2,500.00
TOTAL SUPPLIES
.00
.00
2,500.00
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
001 000 000 525 60 41 00
Professional Services
1,980.00
5,190.00
30,000.00
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
1,980.00
5,190.00
30,000.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY
001 000 000 525 60 64 10
Emerg Mobile Command Vehicle
31,604.62-
70,000.00
108,800.00
OC1 000 000 525.60 64 20
Equipment
.00
.00
44,000.00
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
31,604.62-
70,000.00
152,800.00
TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
29,624.62-
75,190.00
185,300.00
I .0
PAGE 12
% OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
.00
2,500.00
.00
2,500.00
17.30
24,810.00
17.30
24,810.00
64.34
38,800.00
.00
44,000.00
45.81
82,800.00
40.58 110,110.00
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SALARIES & WAGES
001
000
000
558
60
11
00
Salaries & Wages
10,545.39
33,061.17
123,000.00
TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES
10,545.39
33,061.17
123,000.00
PERSONNEL BENEFITS
0C1
000
000
558
60
21
00
Personnel Benefits
2,744.41
8,330.09
30,000.00
TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS
2,744.41
8,330.09
30,000.00
SUPPLIES
001
000
000
558
60
31
00
Operating Supplies
146.88
316.75
1,200.00
TOTAL SUPPLIES
146.88
316.75
1,200.00
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
001
000
000
558
60
41
01
Planning Consultant
13,880.67
22,956.26
75,000.00
001
000
000
558
60
41
02
Hearing Examiner
.00
.00
35,000.00
001
000
000
558
60
41
05
Building Official Consultant
7,749.83
27,185.18
125,000.00
001
000
000
558
60
41
06
Building Inspector Consultant
8,657.08
20,494.67
75,000.00
001
000
000
558
60
41
07
Engineering Consultant
.00
19,861.70
100,000.00
001
000
000
558
60
41
50
Landscape Consultant
4,835.20
8,687.60
90,000.00
001
000
000
558
60
41
60
Construction Mitigation
.00
.00
20,000.00
001
000
000
558
60
42
00
Communications
47.87
90.59
1,800.00
001
000
000
558
60
43
00
Travel & Training
415.00
1,766.87
5,100.00
001
000
000
558
60
49
00
Dues,Subscriptions,Memberships
375.00
375.00
1,000.00
001
000
000
558
60
64
00
Furniture & Equipment
.00
.00
3,500.00
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
35,960.65
101,417.87
531,400.00
TOTAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT
49,397.33
143,125.88
685,600.00
I•
PAGE 13
OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
26.88
89,938.83
26.88
89,938.83
27.77
21,669.91
27.77
21,669.91
26.40
883.25
26.40
883.25
30.61
52,043.74
.00
35,000.00
21.75
97,814.82
27.33
54,505.33
19.86
80,138.30
9.65
81,312.40
.00
20,000.00
5.03
1,709.41
34.64
3,333.13
37.50
625.00
.00
3,500.00
19.09
429,982.13
20.88 542,474.12
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
RECREATION -LIFEGUARDS
SALARIES & WAGES
001 000 000 574 20 it 00
Salaries & Wages
TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES
PERSONNEL BENEFITS
001 000 000 574.20 21 00
Personnel Benefits
001 000 000 574 20 22 00
Uniforms
TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
001 000 000 574 20 31 00
Operating Supplies
001 000 000 574 20 35 00
Small Tools/Minor Equipment
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
001 000 000 574 20 43 00
Travel & Training
001 000 000 574 20 44 00
Advertising
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
TOTAL RECREATION -LIFEGUARDS
PAGE 14
OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
.00
.00
14,930.00
.00
14,930.00
.00
.00
14,930.00
.00
14,930.00
.00
.00
1,800.00
.00
1,800.00
.00
.00
650.00
.00
650.00
.00
.00
2,450.00
.00
.2,450.00
.00
.00
200.00
.00
200.00
.00
.00
200.00
.00
200.00
.00
.00
400.00
.00
400.00
.00
.00
500.00
.00
500.00
.00
.00
200.00
.00
200.00
.00
.00
700.00
.00
700.00
.00
.00
18,480.00
.00
18,480.00
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D. -
ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATED
PARKS DEPARTMENT
SALARIES & WAGES
001 000 000 576 80 11 00
Salaries & Wages
11,837.41
36,776.23
155,310.00
C01 000 000 576 80 12 00
Overtime
.00
.00
2,500.00
TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES
11,837.41
36,776.23
157,810.00
PERSONNEL BENEFITS
001 000 000 576 80 21 00
Personnel Benefits
3,892.21
11,626.79
37,720.00
001 000 000 576 80 22 00
Uniforms
.00
444.58
2,500.00
TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS
3,892.21
12,071.37
40,220.00
SUPPLIES
001 000 000 576 80 31 00
Operating Supplies
163.48
3,090.91
30,000.00
001 000 000 576 80 31 01
Maintenance Supplies
527.04
777.83
9,000.00
001 000 000 576 80 32 00
Vehicle Fuel & Lube
526.55
1,129.74
61000.00
TOTAL SUPPLIES
1,217.07
4,998.48
45,000.00
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
001 000 000 576 80 41 00
Professional Services
7,497.25
81080.10
35,000.00
001 000 000 576 80 41 04
Professional Services-Misc
84.61
84.61
9,000.00
001 000 000 576 80 42 00
Telephone/Postage
251.75
661.46
4,000.00
001 000 000 576 80 43 00
Travel & Training
380.92
530.92
5,000.00
001 000 000 576 80 47 00
Utilities
.00
673.04
6,000.00
001 000 000 576 80 48 00
Repair & Maint Equipment
.00
489.36
4,000.00
001 000 000 576 80 49 00
Miscellaneous
.00
119.43
5,000.00
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
8,214.53
10,638.92
68,000.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY
001 000 000 576 80 63 00
Park Improvements
.00
.00
50,000.00
001 000 000 576 80 64 00
Furniture and Equipment
.00
6,137.82
1,200.00
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL PARKS DEPARTMENT
.00
6,137.82
51,200.00
25,161.22
70,622.82
362,230.00
•
PAGE 15
!k OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
23.68
.00
23.30
30.82
17.78
30.01
10.30
8.64
18.83
11.11
23.09
.94
16.54
10.62
11.22
12.23
2.39
15.65
.00
511.49
11.99
19.50
118,533.77
2,500.00
121,033.77
26,093.21
2,055.42
28,148.63
26,909.09
8,222.17
4,870.26
40,001.52
26,919.90
8,915.39
3,338.54
4,469.08
5,326.96
3,510.64
4,880.57
57,361.08
50,000.00
4,937.82-
45,062.18
291,607.18
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
I*
OPERATING TRANSFERS
001 000 000 597 00 20 00 Equipment Replacement Fund .00
001 000 000 597 00 30 00 Street Fund .00
TOTAL OPERATING TRANSFERS .00
TOTAL EXPENSES 215,856.76
I•
•
.00 77,000.00
.00 322,000.00
.00 399,000.00
PAGE 16
% OF
UNEXPENDED
TOTAL
BALANCE
.00_
77,000.00
.00
322,000.00
.00
399,000.00
844,452.37 4,531,832.58 18.63 3,687,380.21
City of Medina
MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT
March 311 2005
M.T.D.
RECEIPTS
ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
100 000 000 395 10 00 00
Sale of Equipment Property
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
TRANSFERS
100 000 000 397 00 10 00
From General Fund
TOTAL TRANSFERS
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
I•
PAGE 3
Y.T.D. OF REMAINING
RECEIPTS ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPECTATION
.00
.00
4,000.00
.00
4,000.00
.00
.00
4,000.00
.00
4,000.00
.00
.00
77,000.00
.00
77,000.00
.00
.00
77,000.00
.00
77,000.00
.00
.00
81,000.00
.00
81,000.00
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
0 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
CAPITAL OUTLAY
ICO 000 000 514 50 64 00 Admin-Equipment
100 000 000 521 50 64 00 Police -Automobile
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
•
1,949.31-
.00
31,604.62
38,273.40
29,655.31
38,273.40
29,655.31
38,273.40
PAGE 17
W OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
.00 .00 .00
56,000.00 68.35 17,726.60
56,000.00 68.35 17,726.60
56,000.00 68.35 17;726.60
City of Medina
MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D.
RECEIPTS
ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
0
CITY STREET FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
101
000 000 336 00 87 00
Motor Fuel Tax(Unrestricted)
101
000 000 336 00 88 00
Motor Fuel Tax(Restricted)
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
101
000 000 397 00 10 00
From General Fund
TOTAL OPERATING TRANSFERS
TOTAL CITY STREET FUND
I•
•
3,069.41
1,435.15
4,504.56
.00
.00
4,504.56
Y.T.D.
RECEIPTS ESTIMATED
10,036.18
42,700.00
4,692.58
20,000.00
14,728.76
62,700.00
.00
322,000.00
.00
322,000.00
14,728.76 384,700.00
PAGE 4
% OF REMAINING
TOTAL EXPECTATION
23.50
32,663.82
23.46
15,307.42
23.49
47,971.24
.00
322,000.00
.00
322,000.00
3.83 369,971.24
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
CITY STREET FUND
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
SALARIES & WAGES
101 000 000 542 30 11 00 Salaries & Wages
TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES
PERSONNEL BENEFITS
101 000 000 542 30 21 00 Personnel Benefits
101 000 000 542 30 22 00 Uniforms
TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS
ROAD & STREET MAINTENANCE
101 000 000 542 30 31 00 Operating Supplies
101 000 000 542 30 35 00 Small Tools/Minor Equipment
101 000 000 542 30 41 00 Professional Services
101 000 000 542 30 41 10 Road & Street Maintenance
1G1 000 000 542 30 45 00 Machine Rental
101 000 000 542 30 47 00 Utility Services
101 000 000 542 30 48 00 Equipment Maintenance
101 000 000 542 40 41 00 Storm Drain Maintenance
101 000 000 542 63 41 00 Street Light Utilities
101 000 000 542 64 41 00 Traffic Control Devices
101 000 000 542 66 41 00 Snow & Ice Removal
101 000 000 542 67 41 00 Street Cleaning
TOTAL ROAD & ST MAINTENANCE
TOTAL CITY STREET FUND
I ie
•
9,405.41
9,405.41
2,656.68
.00
2,656.68
77.66
.00
.00
.00
.00
38.42
638.12
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
754.20
12,816.29
28,216.23
155,310.00
28,216.23
155,310.00
7,879.09
37,720.00
.00
2,500.00
7,879.09
40,220.00
77.66
8,000.00
.00
1,500.00
4,469.07
60,000.00
17,823.62
150,000.00
102.82
3,500.00
65.92
1,000.00
638.12
4,00.0.00
.00
45,000.00
3,018.32
21,000.00
.00
5,000.00
.00
1,000.00
.00
15,000.00
26,195.53
315,000.00
62,290.85 510,530.00
PAGE 18
W OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
18.17
127,093.77
18.17
127,093.77
20.89
29,840.91
.00
2,500.00
19.59
32,340.91
.97
7,922.34
.00
1,500.00
7.45
55,530.93
11.88
132,176.38
2.94
3,397.18
6.59
934.08
15.95
3,361.88
.00
45,000.00
14.37
17,981.68
.00
5,000.00
.00
1,000.00
.00
15,000.00
8.32
288,804.47
12.20 448,239.15
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
TREE FUND
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
1C3 000 000 589 00 49 10 Miscellaneous -Tree Replacement
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
TOTAL TREE FUND
lie
PAGE 20
% OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
.00
276.68
60,000.00
.46
59,723.32
.00
276.68
60,000.00
.46
59,723.32
.00
276.68
60,000.00
.46
59,723.32
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
I*
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005 PAGE 21
M.T.D. Y.T.D. OF UNEXPENDED
EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED TOTAL BALANCE
PARK PROP. DEBT SERVICE FUND
PARK PROP DEBT PRINCIPAL/INT.
200 000 000 591 76 77 00 Principal 1,711.63 5,112.56 20,858.18 24.51 15,745.62
200 000 000 592 76 83 00 Interest 1,320.67 3,984.34 15,529.42 25.66 11,545.08
TOTAL PARK PROP DEBT PRIN/INT. 3,032.30 9,096.90 36,387.60 25.00 27,290.70
TOTAL PARK PROP DEBT SERV FUND 3,032.30 91096.90 36,387.60 25.00 27,290.70
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
TAXES
307 000 000 317 30 00 00 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX
TOTAL TAXES
I I*
•
City of Medina
MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT
March 31, 2005
PAGE 7
M.T.D.
Y.T.D.
$ OF
REMAINING
RECEIPTS
RECEIPTS ESTIMATED
TOTAL
EXPECTATION
51,752.26
139,372.22 575,000.00
24.24
435,627.78
51,752.26
139,372.22 575,000.00
24.24
435,627.78
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 51,752.26 139,372.22 575,000.00 24.24 435,627.78
ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
IMPROVEMENTS
307 000 00'0 595 30 63 01
Road Construction
307 000 000 595 30 63 02
Storm Sewer Construction
307 000 000 595 30 63 03
Park Improvements
TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
I•
•
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
PAGE 22
!k OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
.00
11,567.49
150,000.00
7.71
138,432.51
.00
.00
150,000.00
.00
150,000.00
.00
10,867.98
268,000.00
4.06
257,132.02
.00
22,435.47
568,000.00
3.95
545,564.53
.00
22,435.47
568,000.00
3.95
545,564.53
City of Medina
MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT
March 31, 2005
M.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION RECEIPTS
NON -REVENUE TRUST FUND
NON -REVENUES
631 000 000 389 12 52 01
WA St -Bldg Code Fee
631 000 000 389 12 52 03
WA St -Judicial Info Systems
631 000 000 389 12 52 06
WA St -State Portion
631 000 000 389 12 52 07
WA St -State 30%
631 000 000 389 12 52 08
WA St -Trauma Care
631 000 000 389 12 52 09
WA St-Lab-Bld/Breath
631 000 000 389 12 52 88
Dept Of Lic-Gun Permit-$18/21
631 000 000 389 12 52 89
WA St Patrol -Gun -FBI ($24)
631 000 000 389 12 52 99
King County -Crime Victims
TOTAL NON -REVENUES
TOTAL NON -REVENUE TRUST FUND
•
•
PAGE 9
Y.T.D. lk OF REMAINING
RECEIPTS ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPECTATION
49.50
175.50
.00
.00
175.50-
375.13
1,323.01
.00
.00
1,323.01-
2,006.33
5,843.90
.00
.00
5,843.90-
1,090.31
3,170.36
.00
.00
3,170.36-
47.81-
289.10
.00
.00
289.10-
125.63
228.10
.00
.00
228.10-
36.00
72.00
.00
.00
72.00-
.00
24.00
.00
.00
24.00-
81.04
223.74
.00
.00
223.74-
3,716.13
11,349.71
.00
.00
11,349.71-
3,716.13
11,349.71
.00
.00
11,349.71-
City of Medina
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
03/31/2005 (Printed 04/05/2005 17:08)
M.T.D. Y.T.D.
ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED
4DNON -REVENUE TRUST FUND
NON -EXPENDITURES
6s1 000 000 589 12 52 88 Dept of Lic-Gun Permit-$18/21
TOTAL NON -EXPENDITURES
I•
u
PAGE 24
& OF UNEXPENDED
TOTAL BALANCE
18.00 36.00 .00 .00 36.00-
18.00 36.00 .00 .00 36.00-
I•
1p
y
O
o
�a
.�
en
W
V
z��
0
�
W
�
H
Val
V
Ana
�
O
w
�5
•
C)
^'
N
N
IO
00
000
M
�
M
p
N
M
to
�
m
0
MG1
CN
e
cli00
cYi
M
�
N
01
r-
64
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
6g
00
`O
00
�
00
00
M
N
N
64
6R
1
t
69
60q
00
N
1
,�
t
1
1
N
tip
V...1
00
C
N
v
m
N
%D
N
60-1
to
l�
r-
00
•--�
00
M
V-4
M
M
N
00
vNi
00
elf
M
tIl
�
p
00
C
r
1-�1
i
69
w
a
w
w
►�-'
w
E
�
rw
W
a
a
�i
ti
a
a
a
I'D
N
>
;�
H
[l- M O
110 e
�
N
qT M t`-
O
t-
P
V-4
-.4
N
r--4
p
V.0
0
ON
H
z
69
69
r•�
�3
O
zz
ri
W
OO
�
U
Check Check VENDOR
Number Amount NUMBER VENDOR NAME
13 58.32 11100 PETTY CASH
20514 3,032.30 3825 DUSTIN FAMILY TRUST
20515
156.92
18175 EUGENE HILTON
20516
109.00
18176 OREGON COMMUNITY TREES
20517
115.00
18126 PNW-ISA CHAPTER
20518
115.00
18174 PUGET SOUND SECTION APA
0
250.00
12685 SCHULZE, DOUGLAS J
20520
4,250.65
350 ACCUNET/ACCUPC
20521
80.02
18142 ALLEGIANCE TELECOM - ADMIN
20522
20523
�J
City of Medina
Check Register
March 31, 2005
DATE DATE
ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER
03/02/05 00/00/00 3/2/05 EXPENSES 001 000 000 369 81 00 00
REPLENISH PETTY CASH
3/2/05 EXPENSES 001 000 000 518 10 42 00
REPLENISH PETTY CASH
3/2/05 EXPENSES 001 000 000 521 20 42 00
REPLENISH PETTY CASH
3/2/05 EXPENSES 001 000 000 576 80 31 00
REPLENISH PETTY CASH
INVOICE TOTAL
03/08/05 00/00/00 APR'05 200 000 000 591 76 77 00
PROPERTY PURCHASE
"RIOS 200 000 000 592 76 83 00
PROPERTY PURCHASE
INVOICE TOTAL
03/08/05 00/00/00 3/9/05-3/11/05 001 000 000 576 80 43 00
BURFORD, JAMIE
INVOICE TOTAL
03/08/05 00/00/00 2005 CONF 001 000 000 576 80 43 00
BURFORD(ROULETTE),JAMIE
INVOICE TOTAL
03/08/05 00/00/00 OR51-65 001 000 000 576 80 43 00
BURFORD, JAMIE
INVOICE TOTAL
03/08/05 00/00/00 2005 PLANNING LW 001 000 000 558 60 43 00
GELLINGS, JOSEPH
INVOICE TOTAL
03/08/05 00/00/00 MAR'OS 001 000 000 513 10 49 01
AUTO ALLOWANCE
INVOICE TOTAL
03/09/05 00/00/00 2148 001 000 000 518 90 41 50
COMPUTER SERVICES
INVOICE•TOTAL
03/09/05 00/00/00 14470709 001 000 000 518 10 42 00
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL
122.40 18163 AMS LASER AND COPIER SYSTEMS 03/09/05 00/00/00 17640A 001 000 000 521 20 31 00
CARTRIDGES
INVOICE TOTAL
245.56 18123 AT&T WIRELESS 03/09/05 00/00/00 FEB'OS 001 000 000 521 20 42 00
POLICE TELEPHONES
INVOICE TOTAL
City of Medina
Check Register
March 31, 2005
Check
Check
VENDOR
DATE DATE
Number
Amount
NUMBER VENDOR NAME
ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER
24
30.00
18063 B & B SHREDDING, LLC
03/09/05 00/00/00 16140 001 000 000 518 10 41 00
SHREDDING SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL
20S25
2,137.00
1825 BELLEVUE TREASURER, CITY OF
03/09/05 00/00/00 5612 001 000 000 519 90 49 03
2005 ARCH CONTRIBUTION
INVOICE TOTAL
20526
584.27
2865 CDW GOVERNMENT INC
03/09/05 00/00/00 QX38195 001 000 000 51.8.90 48 00
VERITAS BACKUP -MEDIA
INVOICE TOTAL
QZ49776 001 000 000 518 90 48 00
VERITAS BACKUP -LICENSE
INVOICE TOTAL
20527
526.55
3100 CHEVRON (PW STREETS)
03/09/05 00/00/00 7898306407502 001 000 000 576 80 32 00
PW AUTOMOBILES
INVOICE TOTAL
20528
87.03
3308 COMPUSA-HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTION 03/09/05 00/00/00 010031 001 000 000 518 90 48 00
CLERK -KEYBOARD W/MOUSE
INVOICE TOTAL
20529
57.33
3385 CRYSTAL SPRINGS
03/09/05 00/00/00 1682638-15 001 000 000 518 10 31 00
WATER
INVOICE TOTAL
20530
75.85
3387 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
03/09/05 00/00/00 3164738 001 000 000 518 10 44 00
PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH
INVOICE TOTAL
I*
43.52
3708 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS
03/09/05 00/00/00 131032 001 000 000 521 20 48 10
POLICE AUTO
INVOICE TOTAL
20532
63.86
4640 ENA COURIERS INC
03/09/05 00/00/00 170227 001 000 000 521 20 42 00
COURIER SERVICE
INVOICE TOTAL
20533
1,566.52
18092 ENVIRONMENT CONTROL
03/09/05 00/00/00 4102042 001 000 000 518 30 48 00
SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL
4102065 001 000 000 518 30 48 00
WINDOW/CARPET CLEANING
INVOICE TOTAL
510432 001 000 000 518 30 48 00
BLDG MAINTENANCE
INVOICE TOTAL
•
City of Medina
Check Register
March 31. 2005
Check
Check
VENDOR
DATE
DATE
Number
AIriOWIt
NUMBER VENDOR NAME
ISSUED
REDEEMED
INVOICE NO.
ACCOUNT NUMBER
34
73.71
5270 FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS
INT'L IN 03/09/05
00/00/00
6449
001 000 000 521 20 48 10
POLICE AUTO #6
INVOICE TOTAL
20535
1,980.00
5275 FINNIGAN, KRISTEN
03/09/05
00/00/00
FEB105
001 000 000 525 60 41 00
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
INVOICE TOTAL
20536
1,665.88
11400 FORD OF BELLEVUE
03/09/05
00/00/00
FOCS246700
001 000 0
20537 333.26
20538 91.35
20540 23.95
93.59
20542
93.59
20543
204.00
20544
•
00 521 20 48 to
POLICE AUTO #7
INVOICE TOTAL
FOCS247371
001 000 000 521 20 48 10
POLICE AUTO #7
INVOICE TOTAL
FOCS247861
001 000 000 521 20 48 10
POLICE AUTO #6
INVOICE TOTAL
5745 GEMPLER'S INC.
03/09/05 00/00/00 1005894294
001 000 000 576 80 31 01
SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL
5875 GRAINGER INC, WW
03/09/05 00/00/00 754-785296-7
001 000 000 576 80 31 01
SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL
6340 HOMEGUARD SECURITY SERVICES
03/09/05 00/00/00 CE1611
001 000 000 521 20 41 00
SECURITY SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL
7180 ISSAQUAH HONDA KUBOTA
03/09/05 00/00/00 27616
101 000 000 542 30 48 00
REPAIR EQUIPMENT
INVOICE TOTAL
7185 ISSAQUAH POLICE DEPT
03/09/05 00/00/00 04-50005054
001 000 000 521 20 51 50
INMATE BILLING
INVOICE TOTAL
7600 KC JOURNAL NEWSPAPERS
03/09/05 00/00/00 1357316
001 000 000 518 10 44 00
LEGAL ADVERISING
INVOICE TOTAL
309.82 10395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 03/09/05 00/00/00 JAN25-FEB24'05 001 000 000 513 10 49 00
CELLULAR PHONES
JAN25-FEB24105 001 000 000 576 80 42 00
CELLULAR PHONES
JAN25-FEB24'05 001 000 000 521 20 42 00
CELLULAR PHONES
INVOICE TOTAL
City of Medina
Check Register
March 31, 2005
Check
Check
Number
Amount
VENDOR
DATE
DATE
45
3,109.18
NUMBER VENDOR NAME
10460 O'BRIEN LAW FIRM, PLLP
ISSUED
03/09/05
REDEEMED
00/00/00
INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER
18122 001 000 000 512 50
41
10
PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
INVOICE TOTAL
20546
444.40
18025 OBERMILLER, DAVID M
03/09/05
00/00/00
2005 RADAR/LIDAR 001 000 000 521 20
43
00
MEALS/HOTEL
INVOICE TOTAL
20547
7,779.15
10555 OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE
03/09/05
00/00/00
642348 001 000 000 515 20
41
10
WAYNE TANAKA
INVOICE TOTAL
642353 001 000 000 515 20
41
10
TANAKA-VARIOUS CASES
INVOICE TOTAL
20548
228.48
10556 OIC EQUIPMENT INC
03/09/05
00/00/00
43838 001 000 000 518 30
45
00
PW DIRECTOR TRAILER
INVOICE TOTAL
20549
10,661.93
10700 OTAK
03/09/05
00/00/00
JAN22-FEB18105AA 001 000 000 558 60
41
01
PLANNING CONSULTANT
INVOICE TOTAL
JAN22-FEB18'05AB 001 000 000 558 60
41
01
PLANNING CONSULTANT
INVOICE TOTAL
JAN22-FEB1810SAC 001 000 000 558 60
41
50
LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT
INVOICE TOTAL
NOV13-DEC10'04AC 001 000 000 558 60
41
01
0
PLANNING CONSULTANT
INVOICE TOTAL
OCT23-NOV12104AC 001 000 000 558 60
41
01
PLANNING CONSULTANT
INVOICE TOTAL
20550
274.62
11015 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION
03/09/05
00/00/00
617369 001 000 000 518 90
48
00
DJ305-ADMIN COPIER
INVOICE TOTAL
20551
154.37
11020 PACIFIC TOPSOILS, INC.
03/09/05
00/00/00
073820 001 000 000 576 80
41
04
TOPSOILS
INVOICE TOTAL
074161 101 000 000 542 30
31
00
TOPSOILS
INVOICE TOTAL
�j
J
City of Medina
Check Register
March 31, 2005
Check
Number
52
20553
Check
VENDOR
DATE
DATE
Amount
NUMBER VENDOR NAME
ISSUED
REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER
331.53
11270 PITNEY BOWES INC-SUPPLIES
03/09/05
00/00/00 574926 001 000 000 518 10 Al 00
435.00 11427 PRICE, JOHN G.
20554 7,497.25 18171 PROTHMAN COMPANY
20555
470.26
11700
PUGET SOUND ENERGY
20556
191.00
11820
QWEST
257.00 13404 SHURGARD OF BELLEVUE
20558 30.00 13380 SIDNEY E RUBIN & ASSOC
POSTAGE
INVOICE TOTAL
03/09/05 00/00/00 22
001 000 000 512 50 41 20
PUBLIC DEFENDER
INVOICE TOTAL
03/09/05 00/00/00 2005-108
001 000 000 576 80 41 00
SCREEN'G-INTERIM PW DER
INVOICE TOTAL
2005-126
001 000 000 576 80 41 00
JOE WILLIS SR
INVOICE TOTAL
2005-99
001 000 000 576 80 41 00
JOE WILLIS SR
INVOICE TOTAL
03/09/05 00/00/00 MAR105C
001 000 000 518 10 47 00
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL
03/09/05 00/00/00 MAR'05C
001 000 000 518 10 42 00
ISDN
INVOICE TOTAL
MAR'05E
001 000 000 518 10 42 00
TELEPHONES
INVOICE TOTAL
03/09/05 00/00/00 UNIT 1121-APR'05
001 000 000 518 30 45 00
STORAGE
INVOICE TOTAL
UNIT 1178-APR'05
001 000 000 518 30 45 00
STORAGE
INVOICE TOTAL
03/09/05 00/00/00 ISMAEL RAMIREZ
001 000 000 521 20 41 50
BACKGROUND
INVOICE TOTAL
20559 269.20 7240 SUDDEN PRINTING-JB GRAPHIX-DOC 03/09/05 00/00/00 11919 001 000 000 518 10 31 00
ENVELOPES
INVOICE TOTAL
20560 38.42 15203 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND 03/09/05 00/00/00 5019390 101 000 000 542 30 47 00
EXCAVATION NOTIFICATION
INVOICE TOTAL
City of Medina
Check Register
March 31, 2005
Check
Check
Number
Amount,
VENDOR
DATE DATE
NUMBER VENDOR NAME
ISSUED REDEEMED
INVOICE NO.
ACCOUNT NUMBER
61
850.00
16141 WA ST UNIVERSITY CASHIER 03/09/05 00/00/00
2005 NWCI
001 000 000 518 10
43 00
BAKER, RACHEL
INVOICE TOTAL
20562
63.98
16151 WASHING MACHINE, INC.
03/09/05 00/00/00
FEB105
001 000 000 521 20
32 00
POLICE AUTOMOBILES
INVOICE TOTAL
20563
97.12
16150 WASHINGTON AWARDS, INC.
03/09/05 00/00/00
39242
001 000 000 518 10
31 00
PLAQUE
INVOICE TOTAL
20564
130.00
16030 WMTA
03/09/05 00/00/00
2005 WMTA CONF
001 000 000 514 10
43 00
BURDUE, JAN
INVOICE TOTAL
20565
27.25
351 ACCURINT
03/17/05 00/00/00
1011660-20050228
001 000 000 521 20
41 50
BACKTROUND SEARCH
INVOICE TOTAL
20566
76.32
422 ALLEGIANCE TELECOM - POLICE 03/17/05 00/00/00
14470707
001 000 000 521 20
42 00
TELEPHONES
INVOICE TOTAL
20567
375.00
160 APA/AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIAT 03/17/05 00/00/00
120405-120727
001 000 000 558 60
49 00
GELLINGS, JOSEPH
INVOICE TOTAL
20568
29.53
270 AT&T
03/17/05 00/00/00
FEB105
001 000 000 576 80
42 00
TELEPHONES
INVOICE TOTAL
I*
255.67
1000 B & B AUTO PARTS
03/17/05 00/00/00
505306
REPAIRS
101 000 000 542 30
48 00
INVOICE TOTAL
20570
1,773.03
18124 BEL-RED AUTO REBUILD INC
03/17/05 00/00/00
6473
001 000 000 521 20
48 10
POLICE AUTO #9
INVOICE TOTAL
Z3571
1,812.57
3100 CHEVRON (PW STREETS)
03/17/05 00/00/00
7898306381503
001 000 000 521 20
32 00
PW AUTOMOBILES
INVOICE TOTAL
20572
214.11
2660 CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SERV,
INC 03/17/05 00/00/00
632110
001 000 000 521 20
45 00
POLICE -COPIER LEASE
INVOICE TOTAL
20573
134.31
3385 CRYSTAL SPRINGS
03/17/05 00/00/00
1682590-15
001 000 000 521 20
31 00
WATER
INVOICE TOTAL
•
PAGE 6
DISTRIBUTION
AMOUNT
850.00
850.00
63.98
63.98
97.12
97.12
130.00
130.00
27.25
27.25
76.32
76.32
375.00
375.00
29.53
29.53
255.67
255.67
1,773.03
1,773.03
1,812.57
1,812.57
214.11
214.11
79.27
79.27
City of Medina
Check Register
March 31, 2005
Check
Check
Number
Amount VENDOR DATE DATE
NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO.
ACCOUNT NUMBER
1682647-15
001 000 000 576 80 31 00
WATER
INVOICE TOTAL
20574
589.26 3890 EASTSIDE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNI 03/17/05 00/00/00 3070
001 000 000 521 20 51 20
RADIO ACCESS FEES
INVOICE TOTAL
20575
69.66 4640 ENA COURIERS INC 03/17/05 00/00/00 169732
001 000 000 521 20 42 00
POLICE COURIER
SERVICE
INVOICE TOTAL
20576
637.57 8750 FEDEX KINKO'S 03/17/05 00/00/00 513500177343
001 000 000 511 60 49 00
SIGN BOARDS -COUNCIL MTG
INVOICE -TOTAL
513500177402
001 000 000 518 10 49 40
COPIES
INVOICE TOTAL
513500177566
001 000 000 558 60 31 00
COPIES
INVOICE TOTAL
20577
104.90 5745 GEMPLER'S INC. 03/17/OS 00/00/00 1005913469
101 000 000 542 30 31 00
TREE WRAP
INVOICE TOTAL
1005933089
001 000 000 576 80 31 01
GEL KNEE PADS
INVOICE TOTAL
0
85.04 5825 GOODSELL POWER EQUIPMENT,INC 03/17/05 00/00/00 240060
SUPPLIES
001 000 000 576 80 31 00
INVOICE TOTAL
240134
101 000 000 542 30 48 00
SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL
240212
001 000 000 576 80 31 01
SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL
20579
117.40 5850 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 03/17/05 00/00/00 127200
001 000 000 521 20 48 10
POLICE AUTO #7
INVOICE TOTAL
20580
165.27 5875 GRAINGER INC, WW 03/17/05 00/00/00 754-329126-9
001 000 000 518 30 48 00
REPAIRS
INVOICE TOTAL
•
City of Medina
Check Register
March 31, 2005
PAGE 8
Check
Check
VENDOR DATE
DATE
DISTRIBUTION
Njunber
Amount
NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED
REDEEMED
INVOICE NO.
ACCOUNT NUMBER
AMOUNT
754-329127-7
001 000 000 518 30
48
00
5.82
---
REPAIRS
INVOICE TOTAL
5.82
754-338499-9
001 000 000 518 30
48
00
34.29
REPAIRS
INVOICE TOTAL
34.29
754-657482-8
001 000 000 518 30
48
00
112.66
REPAIRS
INVOICE TOTAL
112.66
20581
394.00
6110
HEALTHFORCE BILLING DEPT 03/17/05
00/00/00
247-23
001 000 000 521 20
41
50
394.00
RAMIREZ, ISMAEL
INVOICE TOTAL
394.00
20582
170.11
8300
KC FINANCE -MENTAL HEALTH, CHEM 03/17/05
00/00/00
7530024
001 000 000 519 90
51
30
170.11
4TH QTR'04
INVOICE TOTAL
170.11
20583
15.00
9068
LOCATE PLUS.COM 03/17/05
00/00/00
0211495
001 000 000 521 20
49
40
15.00
WEBSOTE USAGE
INVOICE TOTAL
15.00
2)594
300.00
9079
MARRA PHD, HERBERT A. 03/17/05
00/00/00
RAMIERZ, ISMAEL
001 000 000 521 20
41
50
300.00
PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATE
INVOICE TOTAL
300.00
20585
230.00
18178
NORTHWEST FAMILY CARE CENTER 03/17/05
00/00/00
JEFFREY CHEN
001 000 000 521 20
41
50
230.00
FBI PHYSICAL REQUIRED
INVOICE TOTAL
230.00
71
756.26
10550
OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 03/17/05
00/00/00
FEB105
001 000 000 518 10
31
00
756.26
SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL
756.26
20587
10.24
10558
OMEGA PHOTO SPECIALISTS 03/17/05
00/00/00
20618
001 000 000 521 20
31
50
10.24
PHOTO SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL
10.24
20588
34.16
11015
PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 03/17/05
00/00/00
619722
001 000 000 521 20
48
00
34.16
BS507-POLICE COPIER
INVOICE TOTAL
34.16
20589
1,402.56
11820
QWEST 03/17/05
00/00/00
MAR'05A
001 000 000 518 10
42
00
854.10
TELEPHONES
INVOICE TOTAL
854.10
MAR105CC
001 000 000 518 10
42
00
61.54
TELEPHONES
INVOICE TOTAL
61.54
City of Medina
Check Register
March 31, 2005
Check
Check
VENDOR
DATE DATE
rtLunber
Amount
NUMBER VENDOR NAME
ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO.
ACCOUNT NUMBER
00
22.85
16163 WELLS MEDINA NURSERY,INC
03/17/05 00/00/00 21732
001 000 000 576 80 31 00
PANSY
INVOICE TOTAL
20601
1,815.24
18035 YAKIMA COUNTY DEPT OF CORRECTI 03/17/05 00/00/00 FEB105
001 000 000 521 20 51 50
HOUSING/MEDICAL
INVOICE TOTAL
20602
8,657.08
725 AUSTIN, LINDA M.
03/30/05 00/00/00 MAR'05
001 000 000 558 60 41 06
BUILDING INSPECTOR
INVOICE TOTAL
20603
7,749.83
12501 ROHRBACH, G. ROBERT
03/30/05 00/00/00 MAR105
001 000 000 558 60 41 05
BUILDING OFFICIAL
INVOICE TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
11
•
PAGE 10
DISTRIBUTION
AMOUNT
22.85
22.85
1,815.24
1,815.24
8,657.08
8,657.08
7,749.83
7,749.83
91,813.84
•
•
MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police
Monthly Activity Report
City of Medina
Felony Crimes
March YTD YTD
Year End
2005
2005 2004
20►04
Assault, Aggravated
0
0 0
0
Robbery
0
0 0
0
Sexual Assault/Rape
0
0 0
0
Burglary (inc Attempt)
2
8 4
10
Drug Violations
0
0 0
2
Fraud (ID Theft)
0
5 6
18
Vehicle Prowl
2
3 5
19
Theft (over $250)
0
0 1
7
Malicious Mischief
0
0 0
0
Arson
0
0 0
0
Auto Theft (inc Recovery)
1
1 1
7
Poss Stolen Property
0
0 0
1
TOTAL
5
1717
64
Misdemeanor
March
YTS►
YTD
Year Enid
Crimes
2005
2005
2004
2004
Assault, Simple
0
0
0
3
Malicious Mischief
3
7
3
17
Vehicle Prowl
3
7
6
18
Theft (Under $250)
2
4
1
25
Domestic Violence
0
0
1
3
Minor in Possession
0
0
2
6
Drug Violations
0
1
0
3
Total
8
19
13
75
H-1
MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police
Monthly Activity Report
City of Medina
Page 2
Traffic
March
YTD, YTD
Year End
ACCIDENTS
2005
2005 2004
2004
Injury
0
0 0
3
Non -Injury
3
6 1
11
T, OT'AL
3'
6 1
14
Traffic
March
YTD, YTD
Year End
CITATIONS
2005
2005 2004
2004
Driving Under Influence
6
20 32
83
*Other
4
22 60
118
Total
10
42 92
201
Traffic
March
YTD YTD
Year End
INFRACTIONS
2005
2005 2004
2004
Speeding
12
36 144
366
Parking
5
12 20
84
**Other
26
71 148
449
Total
43
119 312
899
March
YTD YTD
Year End
WARNINGS
2005
2005 2004
2004
Total
52
237 691'
2015
March
YTD YTD
Year End
CALLS FOR SERVICE
2005
2005 2004
2004
House Watch
42
165 178
518
False Alarms
23
79 59
281
Assists
58
172 78
307
Suspicious Circumstances
19
51 4
17
Property-Found/Lost
1
.5 6
20
Animal Complaints
8
11 1
6
Missing Person
1
1 0
0
Warrant Arrests
2
9 22
54
***Other
2
5 8
37
Total
156
4" 356
1240
*DWLS; Fail to Transfer Title; No License
**Expired Tabs; No insurance; Fail to stop; Defective Equipment
***Verbal Domestic; Vandalism; Civil Dispute; Disturbance
ITEM H-1
MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police
YEARLY ACTIVITY REPORT
City of Medina
2005
Felony Crimes
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Total
Assault, Aggravated
0
0
0
0
Robbery
0
0
0
0
Sexual Assault/Rape
0
0
0
0
Burglary (inc Attempf
2
4
2
8
Drug Violations
0
0
0
0
Fraud (ID Theft)
2
3
0
5
Vehicle Prowl
1
0
2
3
Theft (over $250)
0
0
0
0
Malicious Mischief
0
0
0
0
Arson
0
0
0
0
Auto/Boat Theft
0
0
1
1
Poss Stolen Property
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
5
7
5
0 0 0` 0 0 0 0 0 0
17
Misdeameanor
Crimes
Jan.
Feb
Mar
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total
Assault, Simple
0
0
0
0
Malicious Mischief
3
1
3
7
Vehicle Prowl
3
1
3
7
Theft (Under $250)
2
0
2
4
Domestic Violence
0
0
0
0
Minor in Possession
0
0
0
0
Drug. Violations
0
1
0
1
Total
8
3
8
0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 19
9
ITEM H-1
MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police
YEARLY ACTIVITY REPORT
City of Medina
Page 2
Traffic
Accidents
Jan
Feb
Mar Apr
.
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
_
Nov
Dec
Total
Injury
0
0
0
0
Non -Injury
3
0
3
6
TOTAL
3
0
3 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
6
Traffic
Citations
Jan
Feb
Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Driving Under Influence
5
9
6
20
Other
7
11
4
22
Total
12
20
10 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
42
Traffic
Infractions
Jan
Feb
Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Speeding.
12
12
12
36
Parking
4
3
5
12
Other
30
15
26
71
Total
46
30
43 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
119
Warnings
Jan
Feb
Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Total.
101
84
52 '
237
Calls for Service
,
Jan
�'eb
Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
House Watch
57
66
42
165
False Alarms
31
25
23
79
Assists
56
58
58
172
Suspicious Circumstances
8
24
19
51
Property-Found/Lost
2
2
1
5
Animal Complaints
0
3
8
11
Missing Person
0
0
1
1
Warrant Arrests
6
1
2
9
Other
1
2
2
5
Total
161
181
156 0
0' 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
498
0
ITEM H-1
•
is
•
Town of
Hunts Point
MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police
Monthly Activity Report
Town of Hunts Point
Felony Crimes
March
YTD
YTD
Year End
2005
2005
2004
2004'
Burglary
1
2
1
7
Forgery (Identity Theft)
1
1
0
2
Vehicle Prowl
1
1
0
4
Theft (over $250)
0
0
0
0
Auto/Boat Theft
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
3
4
1
13
Misdemeanor
March
YT 3
Y'TD
Year End
Crimes
2005
2005
2004 ;
2004
Assault, Simple
0
0
0
0
Malicious Mischief
1
1
0
3
Vehicle Prowl
2
2
0
3
Theft (Under $250)
2
2
1
1
Domestic Violence
0
0
0
0
Minor in Possession
0
0
1
1
Drug Violations
0
0
0
1
Total
5
5 `
2
9
ITEM H-1
Is
MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Town of
Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police
Hants int
Monthly
Activity Report
...c�..�. _�
Hunts Point
Page 2
Traffic
March
YTD
YTD
Year End
CITATIONS
2005
2005
2004
2004
Driving Under Influence
2
9
5
9
Accidents
0
0
0
3
*Other
0
1
14
36
Total
2
10
19
48
Traffic
March
YTD
'YTD
Year End
INFRACTIONS
2005
2005
2004
2004
Speeding
2
6
10
20
Parking
0
0
2
5
**Other
25
50
61
253
Total
27 "
56
73
278
March
YTD
YTD
Year End
WARNINGS
2005
2005
2004
2004
Total
21
39
161 `
461
March
'YTD
YTD
Year End
CALLS FOR SERVICE
2005
2005
2004
2004
House Watch
2
13
12
37
False Alarms
12
24
18
64
Assists
10
17
14
31
Suspicious Circumstances
6
11
1
2
Property-Lost/Found
0
0
0
0
Animal Complaints
0
0
0
0
Warrant Arrests
0
2
4
8
***Other
2
3
5
11
Total
32
70
54
153
*DWLS; Fail to Transfer Title;No License
**Expired Tabs; No insurance;Fail, to stop;Defective
Equipment
***Verbal Domestic; Harassment; Civil Dispute; Trespass
0
ITEM H-1
•
•
MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Town of Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police
Hunts point Yearly Activity Report
Town of Hunts Point
2005
Felony Crimes
Jan
Fels
Mar Apr May Jury Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Total
Burglary _
1
0
1
2
Forgery (Identity)
0
0
1
1
Vehicle Prowl
0
0
1
1
Theft (over $250)
0
0
0
0
Auto/Boat Theft
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
1
0
3 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
Misdemeanor
Crimes
Jan
Feb
Mar ' Apr
May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total
Assault, Simple
0
0
0
0
Malicious Mischief
0
0
1
1
Vehicle Prowl
0
0
2
2
Theft (Under $250)
0
0
2
2
Domestic Violence
0
0
0
0
Minor in Possession
0
0
0
0
Drug Violations
0
0
0
0
Total
0
0
5 0
00 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
ITEM H-1
MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Town d Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police
Hunts Point YEARLY ACTIVITY REPORT
�} HUNTS POINT
2005
Page 2
Traffic
Citations
Jan
Feb
Mar Apr May Jun
Jul' Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Driving Under Influence
2
5
2 .
9
Accidents
0
0
0
0
Other
0
1
0
1
Total
2
6
2 0 4 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 10
Traffic
Infractions
Jan
Feb
Mar Apr May Jun
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Speeding
1
3
2
6
Parking
0
0
0
0
Other
15
10
25
50
Total
16
13
27 0 i 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 56
Calf for Service
Jan
Feb
Mar Apr May Jun
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
House Watch
5
6
2
13
False Alarms
3
9
12
24
Assists
5
2
10
17
Suspicious Circumstances
2
3
6
11
Property-Lost/Found
0
0
0
0
Animal Complaints
0
0
0
0
Warrant Arrests
0
2
0
2
Other
0
1
2
3
Total
15
23
32 0 0 0
0, 0 0 0 0 0 70
C
ITEM H-1
• MEDINA
MONTHLY SUMMARY
MARCH, 2005
•
FELONY CRIMES
Burglary (E-lert #05-014) 2005-0000781 03/09/05 8:05 a.m.
700 block of Overlake Drive E.
Between 4:05 p.m. on 3/8/05 and 8:05 a.m. on 3/9/05, unknown suspect(s) entered an
unoccupied home under construction. Entry was made through an unsecured window
covered by a sheet of plastic. Once inside, the suspect(s) removed construction tools
valued at approximately $2,800.
Vehicle Prowl (E-lert #05-015) 2005-0000799 03/11/05 4:30 p.m.
2700 block of Evergreen Point Rd (Metro Park and Ride)
Between 7:20 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on 3/11/05, unknown person(s) broke into a locked
silver 1998 Ford Contour at the Metro Park and Ride. The suspect(s) broke the front
passenger side window and removed the CD player. Total loss: $950.
Stolen Vehicle Recovery
(E-lert #05-017) 2005-0000844 03/15/05 2:20 p.m.
On Tuesday March 15, at approximately 1:40 p.m., a 2001 BMW 325i was stolen from
Green Lake in Seattle after the owner unknowingly dropped the keys while getting out of
the vehicle. Medina Police vehicles are equipped with Lo-Jack tracking systems, and
picked up a signal coming from the stolen vehicle and followed it into Bellevue. Medina
officers located the abandoned and undamaged vehicle in the 9900 block of NE 1st in
Bellevue.
Burglary (Attempt)(E-lert #05-019) 2005-0000912 03/22/005 8:13 a.m.
7700 block of Overlake Drive W
At approximately 8:12 a.m., the homeowner encountered an individual attempting to
enter his home through an unlocked ground -level bedroom window. Although no
physical intrusion was made into his home, the resident challenged and chased away the
suspect who fled on foot eastbound on Overlake Drive West in the 7900 block. Medina
officers responded within moments of receiving the 911 call and set up containment with
assistance from Kirkland and Bellevue Officers. A K-9 Unit was called and responded
30 minutes later to the scene to conduct a track. Additionally, Officers from the Mercer
Island Marine Patrol were called to provide water -side containment. After an exhaustive
search which lasted several hours, officers were unable to locate the suspect. During this
incident, due to the proximity to the Medina Elementary School, the Medina Police
Department ordered a lockdown of the school. Once it was determined the scene was
safe and the suspect was no longer in the area, the school was advised that the lockdown
was no longer necessary. The lockdown was done as a precautionary measure to ensure
the safety of the students and faculty. The suspect is described as a black male with a
Medina Police Department Monthly Report for City of Medina
March 2005
ITEM H-1
•
light to medium complexion, early to mid 20's, approximately 5' 8" in height, 140
pounds, medium build, wearing khaki/tan colored pants, a green jacket with a hood, and a
grey knit cap. It is believed this suspect may also be responsible for the burglary that
occurred on 2/14/05 in the 600 block of 81 St Avenue NE (E-lert #05-010). Medina Police
will continue to augment regular patrol activity with extra emphasis patrols.
Vehicle Prowl 2005-0000913 03/22/05
1000 block of 84th Ave NE
Victim reported between 6:00 p.m. on 3/13/05 and 11:00 a.m. on 3/22/05 unknown
person(s) entered her vehicle and took a full set of Ping golf clubs from the back of her
vehicle. Victim states she normally locks her vehicle, but recalls her vehicle being
unlocked sometime between 3/14/05 and 3/18/05. She said there was no sign of forced
entry and nothing additional missing. Total loss: $1,300.
MISDEMEANOR CRIMES
Vehicle Prowl 2005-0000689 03/02/05 3:20 p.m.
7900 block of Overlake Drive W
Victim reported her employer's vehicle cell phone was stolen out of the company car
sometime between 12/10/04 and 02/28/05 while parked in the driveway. She also
reported $1,000 worth of charges were made on the cell phone; the calls were shown to
have been made from Tyler, Texas to Dallas, Texas. No damage to the vehicle. The cell
phone was valued at $50.
Vehicle Prowl 2005-0000791 03/10/05 8:50 a.m.
800 block of 83rd Ave NE
Officer responds to a report of a vehicle prowl that occurred between 8:30 p.m. on 3/9/05
and 6:30 a.m. on 3/10/05. Unknown person(s) entered two unlocked vehicles that were
parked in the driveway in front of the victim's residence. A black backpack containing
the victim's workout gear was removed from the backseat of one of the vehicles, but the
victim recovered the pack from the 8200 block of NE 8th Street prior to the officer's
arrival. No additional items were removed from the vehicles.
Malicious Mischief 2005-0000846 03/15/05 8:00 a.m.
7800 block of NE 28th (Bellevue Christian School)
Medina officer responded to a report of graffiti discovered on playground equipment in
the southwest corner of the property. School personnel had cleaned off the graffiti before
the officer arrived. Total loss: $25.
Medina Police Department Monthly Report for City of Medina
March 2005 2
ITEM H-1
Theft (Attempt) 2005-0000929 03/23/05 7:30 a.m.
400 block of 87`h Avenue NE
Officer responded to a report of an attempted theft that occurred between 6:00 p.m. on
3/22/05 and 6:45 a.m. on 3/23/05 at a residence that is currently under construction.
Unknown person(s) attempted to break into the construction tool storage trailer during the
night. The padlock to the gate of the chain link fence that surrounds the site had been cut
off and was lying on the ground. The officer discovered new tool marks on the side
pocket door to the trailer showing an attempt to enter the trailer. Nothing was missing on
the job site. Total damage: $50.
Theft (Mail) (E-lert #05-021) 2005-0000942 03/24/05 9:34 a.m.
9000 block of NE 34th
A large amount of mail belonging to residents of Clyde Hill and Medina was recovered in
a driveway in the 9000 block of NE 24th in Yarrow Point. It appears the mail thieves
stole the mail shortly after it was delivered the day before. There were at least seven
residents in the north end of Medina that were victimized. The recovered mail was
addressed to homes in the 3200-3600 blocks of Evergreen Point Road, including
Fairweather Place and 78th Place NE. A small amount of first class mail was recovered,
as it appears the suspect(s) sifted through the mail to remove those items, leaving the
"junk mail" behind. Mail thieves often target first class mail in hopes of gathering
personal identifying information that can later be used for identity theft. Medina Police
are conducting emphasis patrols and are working in conjunction with the U.S. Postal
Inspector. All of the victims in this case have been contacted and arrangements have
been made for the return of their mail. As of this time, none of the victims have reported
fraudulent activity on their accounts.
Malicious Mischief 2005-0000972 03/25/05 8:32 p.m.
600 block of 81 st Ave NE
Medina Officer responded to a report of malicious mischief that occurred between 8:00
p.m. and 11:00 p.m. on 3/25/05 while she was visiting a resident at the 8100 block of
Overlake Drive West. When she returned to the vehicle at approximately 11:00 p.m. she
noticed her vehicle was covered with egg residue. Total loss: $50.
Malicious Mischief 2005-0000984 03/24/05 2:00 p.m.
7800 block of NE 28th Street
Officer responded to a report of malicious mischief between 8:00 p.m. on 3/24/05 and
7:00 a.m. on 3/25/05. Victim reported her vehicle was parked on the street in front of her
residence when unknown person(s) threw eggs at the vehicle. Victim said there was
slight damage to the paint on the front end of her vehicle. Total loss: $50.
Vehicle Prowl 2005-0000988 03/26/05 7:52 p.m.
700 block of Overlake Drive East
Officer responded to a report of a vehicle prowl that had occurred within the last thirty
minutes. The victim discovered the driver's side door lock to her vehicle was damaged.
Her vehicle was parked on the side of the street. Items missing from the vehicle were a
cell phone, a game boy, and a fanny pack containing $20 cash, and credit cards. Total
loss: $370.
Medina Police Department Monthly Report for City of Medina
March 2005 3
ITEM H-1
•
•
•
OTHER
CPS Referral 2005-0000687 03/02/05 2:00 p.m.
1200 block of Evergreen Point Rd
A Medina officer was assigned to investigate a CPS referral after a Bellevue High School
counselor reported seeing possible signs of physical abuse to a student. The
student/victim lives in Medina with her father. According to the CPS report the victim
suffered past abuse by a stepfather and was removed from that home to live with her
father in Medina. The officer interviewed several witnesses, including friends of the
victim, but was unable to confirm the allegations. The victim has denied any abuse by
her father in Medina.
Death Investigation
8400 block of NE 1 Oth
2005-0000780 03/09/05 6:51 a.m.
Reporting party called 911 to report her 86-year old husband was in bed and non-
responsive. Bellevue Fire and Medics arrived and were unable to revive the victim. The
victim had congestive heart failure and prostate cancer. The Medical Examiner was
contacted and ruled it a natural death. The body was released to the family.
Missing Person (Located) 2005-0000835 03/14/05 6:36 p.m.
8400 block of Ridge Road
Officer responded to a missing person complaint from a mother concerned for the welfare
of her 17 year -old son, who had just finished chemotherapy from a brain tumor and was
in a weakened condition. She stated he and his younger brother had an argument and he
left on foot. Medina Police coordinated a quadrant search using several friends and
family of the missing person and also initiated a call out to the King County Search and
Rescue. Within approximately two hours a family friend located the 17 year old in
Bellevue and he was returned home unharmed.
CALLS FOR SERVICE
Warrant Arrests ( 2 )
2005-0000693 $2,075 King County DWLS-1st
2005-0000900 $5,000 Medina Fail to Appear
Medina Police Department Monthly Report for City of Medina
March 2005
4
ITEM H-1
is HUNTS POINT
MONTHLY SUMMARY
MARCH, 2005
FELONY CRIMES
Vehicle Prowl (E-lert #05-014) 2005-0000793 03/10/05 2:45 p.m.
8300 block of Hunts Point Circle
Officer responds to report of vehicle prowl that occurred sometime between 8:00 a.m. on
3/6/05 and 2:45 p.m. on 3/10/05. Unknown person(s) entered the unlocked vehicle that
was parked in the driveway and removed the stereo. Total loss: $400.
Fraud (Identity Theft) 2005-0000824 03/13/05 6:00 p.m.
8400 block of Hunts Point Lane
Victim stated unknown person(s) obtained his American Express account
number/information and $1,197.94 in charges were made at several different locations.
The charges began on 3/3/05 and ended 3/6/05, when the account was cancelled. He is
unsure how the suspect(s) obtained his account information. Case is under investigation.
Burglary (E-lert #05-016) 2005-0000830 03/14/05 10:11 a.m.
3100 block of Fairweather Place
Medina officers are investigating a burglary that occurred between 7:00 a.m. on 3/11 /05
and 11:00 p.m. on 3/13/05. The residents returned home after a weekend away and
discovered unknown person(s) had entered their home and removed electronics
equipment and artwork. There was no sign of forced entry into the residence, however
exterior doors were found unlocked. The residence does not have an alarm system and
was unoccupied. Total loss: $2,500.
MISDEMEANOR CRIMES
Malicious Mischief 2005-0000758 03/06/05 2:30 p.m.
3400 block of Hunts Point Road
Complainant reports that between 2:30 p.m. on 3/5/05 and 2:30 p.m. on 3/6/05, unknown
person(s) opened two telephone junction boxes located on the south side of the residence,
and cut the telephone lines in these boxes. The cable TV wires were also ripped away
from their connection. The cut wires affected the alarm system, but there were no signs
of attempted entry into the residence.
Vehicle Prowl (E-lert #05-014) 2005-0000787 03/10/05 6:40 a.m.
3000 block of Hunts Point Circle
4o Officer responded to a vehicle prowl that occurred between 9:00 p.m. on 3/9/05 and 6:20
a.m. on 3/10/05. Unknown person(s) entered two unlocked vehicles parked in the
Medina Police Department Monthly Report for Town of Hunts Point
March 2005
ITEM H-1
•
driveway of the residence. A garage door opener was removed from one of the vehicles.
The victim checked the garage and determined no one had entered.
Vehicle Prowl (E-lert #05-014) 2005-0000788 03/10/05 7:15 a.m.
8400 block of Hunts Point Lane
Officer responded to a forced entry vehicle prowl that occurred between 11:30 p.m. on
3/9/05 and 7:00 a.m. on 3/10/05. The vehicle was locked and parked in the driveway in
front of the residence. A rear passenger -side window was broken out and a plastic
"Storables" shopping bag containing two black leather jewelry cases and two clear plastic
jewelry cases were removed from the back of the vehicle. Total loss: $100.
Theft (Mail) 2005-0000890 03/19/05 12:35 a.m.
8300 block of Hunts Point Circle
Medina Officer responded to a report of mail theft in progress. The witness noticed a
vehicle sitting in a neighbor's driveway. The witness drove around the block when she
noticed the vehicle sitting in front of a set of mailboxes and the driver begin opening an
unlocked mailbox. When the witness came around the block, the driver of the suspect
vehicle noticed the witness and drove away, merging onto SR-520. The witness then
called 9-1-1 to report suspicious activity. Officers checked the mailboxes and discovered
they contained no mail, but a single piece of notebook paper, which is being processed
for latent fingerprints. Some time later one of the victim's received a call from the
Seattle Police Department stating they located a piece of her stolen mail at the scene of
another mail theft in Seattle.
Theft (Mail) 2005-0000919 03/22/05 6:30 p.m.
3000 block of Hunts Point Circle
Officer responded to a report that a box of checks had been stolen from the victim's
mailbox. Having been the victim of a vehicle prowl earlier this month (Case 2005-
0000787) where his checkbook was stolen, he had ordered checks for his new account,
but went out of town prior to their delivery. On 3/17/05 he received a call from Bank of
America asking if he had written a check to a certain individual who was in the bank
attempting to cash a check. He said he had not and the subject was arrested by the Seattle
Police Department. On 3/18/05, he received another call from Bank of America relaying
the same information. Once again, the subject was arrested by the Seattle Police
Department.
CALLS FOR SERVICE
House watches 2
Alarm Incidents 12
Assists 10
Warrant Arrests (0 )
Medina Police Department Monthly Report for Town of Hunts Point
March 2005 2
ITEM H-1
• OTHER
•
r�
Welfare Check 2005-0000831 03/14/05 11:20 a.m.
3200 block of Hunts Point Road
Officer responded to a welfare check because the reporting party's housekeeper was very
depressed and despondent and had talked about committing suicide prior to leaving the
residence. Officer conducted an area check, but was unable to locate him. The resident
reached the housekeeper on 03/16/05 and discovered he was okay.
Telephone Harassment 2005-0000922 03/22/05 10:38 p.m.
8000 block of NE 28th Street
Officer responded to a report concerning telephone harassment. Victim reported that at
the beginning of February he evicted the tenants who lived at the above address. One of
the tenants owed back rent. A few days later the victim discovered a hole made by a BB
or pellet in the master bedroom window, but did not report it to police at that time. On
3/22/05, the victim once again inquired about the money owed and later that night
received a threatening voice mail message. The victim was concerned for his safety and
about further damage to his property and requested a police report to document incidents.
Medina Police Department Monthly Report for Town of Hunts Point
March 2005 3
ITEM H - 2
CITY OF MEDINA
Development Services
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
www.medina-wa.gov
DATE: April 5, 2005
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Joseph Gellings, AICP, Director of Development Services
RE: Monthly Development Services Department Report
Planning Commission Meeting Recap — There was one construction mitigation hearing and one
discussion topic on the April 5, 2005 Planning Commission agenda. The hearing was for construction of a
new house at 1000 — 82r"d Avenue NE. No neighbors commented on the mitigation plan. It was approved
as submitted. The discussion topic was expanding the scope of variances decided administratively. The
Commission reviewed a new scope recommended by staff and decided to recommend this scope to the
City Council.
Changes to Land Use Notices — After a recent conference session concerned with public participation I
have decided to make two changes to land use notices: 1) Add a statement describing the nature of the
decision criteria. The notices do not contain enough space to describe each of our seven variance
criteria. However, by describing the notion of relief for unusual hardships I believe we will have less
instances of citizens feeling that their input was ignored. 2) Include the date that the staff recommendation
report will be prepared. We usually prepare these a week in advance of the hearing while the notice goes
out two weeks in advance. The thought is to convey to citizens that their comments may carry even more
weight if they're submitted prior to preparation of the staff recommendation report.
I*
ITEM H-3
•
•
CITY OF M EDI NA
Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039
(425) 454-9222 www.ci.medina.wa.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 5, 2005
TO: City Council, City Manager
FROM: Joe Willis Sr., Director of Public Works
RE: Public Works Activity Report
1. The Park Board at their scheduled meeting on March 21, 2005 reviewed
proposed parking lot designs prepared by the Director of Public Works for the
Medina Park 82nd Ave NE area, and Fairweather Nature Preserve upper tennis
court area. During the meeting, the Board reviewed the proposals and provided
recommendations for the parking space layouts. Contractor quotes will be obtained
and the paving will be scheduled for this spring. Park signage was discussed in
concept with the Board recommending that they be naturalistic and understated.
Sign options will be considered at the next Board meeting. An Arbor Day tree
planting ceremony is planned for April 30t" in Medina Park.
2. The Public Works Crew has completed the following:
• Refurbished both Medina entry signs
• Cleaned up Medina Park, removed grass around plantings, removed blackberries
• Replaced bathroom fan in Men's room at city hall
• Weeded, pruned and mulched beach garden, 8tn planting, Overlake planting
• Cut new tree wells, mulched, cleaned out 82nd St planting area
• Drainage on 82nd, Place catch basins and pipe
• Vactored out and jetted several catch basins and storm drain lines in city
• Swept bike lane along 84tn
• Replace street sign at 88th PI & Lake Wa. Blvd
• Placed public notice postings
• Removed willow tree in Medina Park (beaver damage)
• Cleaned, sanded, polished, and sealed Medina Park and Windsong plaques
• Fixed toilet in city hall
• Installed telephone lines and computer lines in City Hall for new phone system
• Posted "Do Not Eat Pikeminnow" signs at city waterfronts
ITEM H-3
• Placed fencing around certain trees and began monitoring for further beaver damage
to park trees in Medina Park
• Located buried manholes along golf course on 84th
• Completed traffic counts/studies for Police Dept. on 83rd and 8d'
• Wrote articles for the City Newsletter
• Began preparations for Arbor Day
• Pruned plantings around the south pond of Medina Park
• Began removal of invasive plants from parks as part of annual maintenance
programs
• Continued planting trees for PSE project
0
ITEM H-5
City of Medina
M4
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina WA 98039
Ph: 425-454-9222 Fx: 425-454-8490
www.medina-wa.gov
April 5, 2005
TO: Mayor and City Council
FM: Medina Park Board
RE: March 21, 2005 Draft Park Board Minutes
Draft minutes from March 21, 2005 Park Board meeting are attached. Unapproved
minutes have been reviewed by boardmembers and will be voted for approval during
the next scheduled meeting.
The next Park Board meeting is scheduled for Monday, April 18t"
•
•
DRAFT
I*
ITEM H-5
CITY OF MEDINA
Park Board Meeting
March 21, 2005 Medina City Hall
7:00 p.m. 501 Evergreen Point Road
Call to Order
March 21, 2005, Park Board meeting called to order by Chair, Connie Gerlitz,
7:06 pm.
Roll Call
Present:
Chair Connie Gerlitz, Vice Chair Lisa Fleischman
Boardmembers Steve Brustkern,' Roger Ngouenet, Heija Nunn, Karen Sparks,
and Susannah Stuart
Staff Present:
Joe Willis, Interim Director of Public Works; Rachel Baker, Administrative
Assistant
Announcements (7:06 pm)
Ngouenet announced he volunteered to maintain park board portion of city
commissioned website and intends to make website more user-friendly.
Minutes
BOARD AGREED BY COMMON CONSENT TO APPROVE FEBRUARY 9, 2005
PARK BOARD MINUTES, 7:09 PM.
Audience Participation
Lucius Biglow, 2425 Evergreen Point Road, Medina (7:10 pm)
Biglow reported Morey Wetherald, a former Hunts Point mayor, often
photographs herons in Medina Park. Biglow indicated Wetherald offered to show
his photographs to the Park Board and asked if the board would like to sponsor a
program, suggesting it would be good public relations for Medina Park. Biglow
volunteered to forward boardmembers materials from Wetherald.
DRAFT
Biglow further stated enforcement, rather than new rules are the main issue
concerning Medina Park. Biglow announced a new program, designed by
residents, would enforce current ordinance regulations, including complaints
about dog waste. Biglow suggested placing program on a future agenda for
board discussion.
Allyson Jackson, 7633 NE 14"' Street, Medina (7:13 pm)
Jackson requested a list of criteria, which would be used to re-evaluate the dog
ordinance. She indicated the city manager informed her the criteria would be
available during the beginning of 2005.
Jackson said there are numerous ideas in the community about how to ensure
Medina Park could be a park for everyone and indicated she would like to see
the Park Board create a forum or other formalized process to formulate a plan for
improving Medina Park.
Park Updates (7:18 pm)
Sparks informed boardmembers she received an email message from Pat
Crickmore, Public Works Supervisor, regarding suspected beaver activity in
Medina Park, which confirmed damage was made primarily to immature trees or
trees scheduled to be removed. Willis said the Washington State Department of
Fish and Wildlife would be contacted for removal and relocation of the animal
and verified the willow tree in the park will be removed.
Stuart announced goose droppings have increased at Medina Beach and
informed board of lace bug damage to rhododendrons and azaleas in Medina.
Stuart suggested aggressive spraying to prevent further destruction from lace
bugs. Gerlitz directed Willis to email an update to boardmembers regarding lace
bug situation after he speaks to the crew and determines if spraying can
commence to control infestation.
Gerlitz requested Willis research costs associated with employing a dog to
control goose droppings at beach park and provide follow up at next meeting.
Gerlitz indicated item would be placed on next meeting agenda for discussion.
Old Business
2005 Budget Update (7:22 pm)
Gerlitz moved discussion item to next meeting.
2005 Work Plan (7:23 pm)
Gerlitz initiated discussion requesting project updates for 2005 Work Plan items.
Park Board Minutes March 21, 2005
Wage 2
DRAFT
• Parking Lots: Medina Park
Willis distributed lot designs and discussed improvement ideas. During
discussion members provided the following suggestions:
o Disabled parking
Willis said stalls one, and eleven or nineteen could be designated
for disabled parking.
o Large, wide parking spaces to accommodate families, dogs and
large vehicles
o Dog wash and/or hose in lot to clean dogs after park use
o Consistent lot design for both parking lots
o Leave design decision to experts for one-way versus two-way
access
Willis indicated a small works bid would be placed, but a design and plan must
be determined prior to obtaining quotes from contractors.
• Parking Lot: Fairweather Nature Preserve (7:39 pm)
Willis circulated existing and draft designs to boardmembers. Following
discussion, board provided the following recommendations:
o Wide and accommodating parking spaces
o Disabled parking placement beside concrete practice pad
o Discretely marked parking stalls
o Sign installation to deter park and ride parking
o Water fountain/dog wash station replacement
Willis offered to research fountain replacement costs and designs.
Gerlitz suggested boardmembers visit Fairweather, inspect practice pad, and be
prepared to discuss practice pad placement at next meeting.
• Signs (7:54 pm)
o Medina Park
Willis conveyed his crew would like guidance and direction regarding sign
design from Park Board. The board recommended sign consolidation
utilizing an understated, naturalistic and unique design.
o Five Corners
0 Board indicated city council would ultimately decide on sign design for
Park Board Minutes March 21, 2005
Page 3
A
five -corners location, but would provide recommendations to council
based on re -landscaping improvements and sign research.
Brustkern volunteered to obtain signage ideas and Ngouenet offered to
research the web for more examples. Additionally, Gerlitz directed Willis
to locate examples and bring to future meeting.
o Fairweather Nature Preserve
Discussion postponed until next meeting.
Medina Beach Park Update
• Outlook Area Benches (8:13 pm)
Willis circulated OTAK bench designs, describing idea to place four,
four -foot benches in an arc pattern and asked board to provide preferences for
bench design.
Board tended towards a curved placement of three or four teak benches, unless
enough donations were procured for two custom-made benches. Willis indicated
he would provide more information at a future meeting.
I* • Bulkhead Restoration Project (8:15 pm)
Willis distributed and explained handout of most current drawing, designed by the
Corps of Engineers. Willis conveyed the design would not serve the best interest
of Medina, would not be cost effective and would not be within budget.
Willis reported he contacted Waterfront Construction to obtain a bid on bulkhead
replacement, which would have a different design and would be based on
affordability and safety. Willis indicated he expects to receive the proposal soon
and suggested applying for all permits shown in drawings, although all the
proposed work (bulkhead, docks) would not be required to be completed
simultaneously.
Discussion followed.
Other Business
Vision statement (8:27 pm)
Gerlitz indicated the Vision Statement is not a legal document and would like it
posted on the city Is website, but would email council to determine if there would
be any objection first.
Park Board Minutes March 21, 2005
Page 4
r,PJFAFA
0 Criteria for Dog Ordinance Re-evaluation (8:30 pm)
•
Boardmembers engaged in discussion regarding Jackson's earlier participation
and determined the board is open and accessible monthly for community input,
response and communication. Board also determined the criteria formulation is
not a Park Board responsibility. Fleischman suggested placement of a comment
box or comment station in Medina Park as another method to obtain public input.
Gerlitz offered to respond on behalf of the Park Board to Jackson regarding
comments addressed and suggested placing ordinance re-evaluation criteria on
agenda at future meeting if necessitated by council.
MOTION SPARKS, SECOND NUNN, FOR PARK BOARD TO PRESENT
ORDINANCE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL WHEN DOG
ORDINANCE IS RECONSIDERED BY COUNCIL, FOLLOWING DISCUSSION,
MOTION FAILED, 8:58 PM.
New Business
Resident Letter (9:09 pm)
Board discussed letter submitted by resident, Thomas Bacher. Gerlitz directed
Willis to speak to crew about noxious weed growth in Medina and provide a
report at the next meeting. Gerlitz also suggested members visit areas and
identify weeds noted in letter before the next meeting. Gerlitz offered to respond
to Mr. Bacher, indicating the board will look into the issues addressed in letter.
Arbor Day (9:12 pm)
Sparks questioned if Medina will honor Arbor Day. Willis said a tree would be
planted in Medina Park on Arbor Day and will notify board by next meeting of
ceremony details. Willis also stated the upcoming newsletter would provide
information regarding Arbor Day.
Gerlitz suggested Arbor Day celebration information should be posted on the
city's website and asked Ngouenet to post in Medina Discussion Group.
Resident Proposal (9:14 pm)
Lucius Biglow presented board a memo proposing committee designed to assist
with enforcement of dog ordinance. Gerlitz informed Mr. Biglow and board that
she and Mayor Odermat plan to discuss proposal with Mr. Biglow over lunch and
indicated item could be placed on the next meeting agenda.
Park Board Minutes March 21, 2005
Page 5
DRAFT
•
Adjournment
MOTION BRUSTKERN, SECOND FLEISCHMAN TO ADJOURN FEBRUARY 9,
2005 PARK BOARD MEETING, UNANIMOUSLY PASSED, 9:16 PM.
March 21, 2005 Park Board meeting adjourned, 9:16 pm.
Next Park Board meeting is scheduled for Monday, April 18, 2005; 7:00 pm.
Minutes taken by:
Rachel Baker
Administrative Assistant
Park Board Minutes
March 21, 2005
ITEM I -1
•
CITY OF MEDINA
Development Services
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
www.medina-wa.gov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 5, 2005
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Joseph Gellings, AICP, Director of Development Services
RE: Site Plan Review
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold a public hearing on the
ordinance draft and consider a reduced lot size for the program trigger.
POLICY IMPLICATION: Enacting a site plan review program would supplement existing Medina
Municipal Code (MMC) provisions for the construction of large homes in Medina — primarily the
development standards found in Title 17 (the Zoning Code) and the Construction Mitigation Program in
Chapter 15.20.
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council adopt a
Site Plan Review program that would be required for the construction of large new homes. At their
February 28, 2005 meeting the City Council identified some minor changes needed to the draft ordinance
and then directed staff to perform noticing for a public hearing on the proposed ordinance.
New Staff Recommendation
Interactions I have recently had with other planners at the American Planning Association conference
combined with the City Council's recent rejection of the formula approach to side setback regulation have
led me to the conclusion that site plan review is the best approach to dealing with the out -of -scale
redevelopment problem even on our medium-sized lots. I am recommending that the City Council change
the 80,000 square foot trigger point recommended by the Planning Commission to 40,000 square feet.
Under the heading of "Experiences of Peer Cities" below you will find elaboration on my examination of
peer cities that have adopted site plan review or design review. Under the heading of "Regulatory Burden
for Applicants" below you will find elaboration how I feel that site plan review will allow the City to address
our problems more directly than we can with indiscriminate Zoning Code restrictions.
Page 1
ITEM I -1
Follow -Up
I have done the following in response to the City Council's February 28, 2005 discussion of site plan review:
• 1 have discussed with the new City Attorney additional ways to clarify in the ordinance that site plan
review is not intended to regulate the massing of a proposed home or any other aspect of architectural
design. As a result, a new statement has been added to the Purpose and Intent Section. The City
Attorney and I also discussed using examples to illustrate site plan review objectives in application
materials if the ordinance were to pass.
• A council member asked if the wording of Section 5-A-3 is consistent with the previous footnote
that objections do not automatically result in the revision being forwarded to the Planning
Commission for review. I believe they are consistent because the previous language automatically
forwarded the matter with the appearance of a single objection whereas the new language leaves
room for the City Manager or designee to reach an agreement with the applicant without
forwarding to the Planning Commission.
Experiences of Peer Cities
In March I attended the American Planning Association's National Conference in San Francisco. I had
heard in the past that the Silicon Valley area outside of San Francisco has some cities with very similar
circumstances to Medina. With that in mind, I did a great deal of planning for my time at the conference
including making contact with my counterparts in these cities in advance and signing -up for a conference
session that involved a tour of Palo Alto to illustrate the success of their "Individual Review" program for
new homes.
There are many things that make Medina unique but I believe an important aspect of Medina when
examining the scale problems is the fact that we have had multiple distinct eras of development. Most
isimportantly, many of Medina's neighborhoods were fully developed in the 60's and 70's on relatively small
lots when Medina was not a particularly affluent community. As the decades passed, many of these old
homes were maintained quite well and updated by new owners. All the while the landscaping and trees
continued to grow, giving these neighborhoods a distinctive and mature character. It is in this context that
the alternative path of new owners — teardown redevelopment of lots — can lead to so much tension
between neighbors. For this reason, the occurrence of a previous wave of development at least 30 years
ago was as important as current home values when I set out to identify peer cities to Medina. (See Table
1.)
•
As can be seen in Table 1, all of the Silicon Valley peer cities have adopted or are about to adopt a site
plan review or design review program for new home construction. From what I have learned, they each
had reservations at first but Burlingame was the first to adopt a program in the late 90's and the others
quickly acted on Burlingame's success. I have surveyed for the existence of site plan review and design
review programs together because these two programs are really just different degrees of the same type
of regulation — discretionary review of selected aspects of residential design. At one end of the spectrum
site plan review is only concerned with the placement of the house and other site features on the site; at
the other end is an architectural design review that regulates the fundamental style of a house. As can be
seen from the table, none of the Silicon Valley cities carry design review into regulation of architectural
style. On the other hand, they all regulate more than the simple placement of homes that we are
proposing for Medina. Another notable commonality to all of the Silicon Valley cities is very low rates of
appeal from design review / site plan review decisions.
Page 2
10
10
C
N
V
L
O
v
L
C
V
E
Lm
0
FL
a�
cn
cm
O
r.
CL
v
a
r
H
N V
O N
•�
'U (D
'U a
0.0
c0xwCL
cxcua
vnz
os
a)-0 m-
o a)-0 m
O
i
O
O
a) Q
CO).�
C O O
Q)
V
N
U
•C
L
M
5 cu E
0) Q
a)
M
C O
a)
L
'a O
0a—°po
(D
3
moo.—o
L)a—a�
°
a
n c
cm�`�
o
��o
n o a
cu�E
n.c
cm*-•`�co�
..,
ac
°
mCh
te(1)
=3 CU (1)o
a)
f6 (a3
v
c� (�
E
(tf
E
U
c� •� 5, O
0.
c�
(6
E c
(u
E
U
0
E c E
N
c
13
c
U�
c
L w
0 U
J 'a
M
In
O
O
O
�
O
T-
r
0o
p
O
O
N=�
O
O
O
O
O
:'
00
O
H U N
ti
CO
LO
00
lf)
M
N
N
O O
tm
c.i z 00 O a
O
C� d fl•
° 3
Q1
'coo >
=• � � �
!C •— d O
to
to
c�
c�
cs
�°
�
�
W Z W i%•
d
E N
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
�
'O
N
O
O
L O O
M
ti
co
N?
O
6q
try
ai
Z
p
O
W
Ecm
_
'O
Q
o
c
U
o
C
m
a)
m
�
co
V
IL
fn
m
to
U
=
ITEM I -1
•
To include a Washington State perspective, attached is an article on design review programs from the
newsletter of the Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington. While much of the discussion
concerns design review for multifamily or commercial uses, it does reference the recurring message that
the success of design review depends on clearly conveying the program objectives to applicants.
Regulatory Burden forApplicants
In forming my recommendation to lower the trigger for invoking site plan review, I remain mindful of the
City Council's general concern about the burden of development regulations on property owners.
However, I believe that site plan review will allow us to target the issues with teardown redevelopment in a
manner that is more efficient that relying on sweeping one -size -fits -all Zoning Code restrictions.
On numerous occasions in the past, the City has addressed some aspect of a large house problem
through changes to the Zoning Code restrictions that affect all properties. A striking illustration of this is
found in Figure 1, which is a plot of the structural coverage allowance for the R-20 zone throughout the 50
years that Medina has been a City. The current 13% allowance is a fraction of the 30% allowance that
existed through most of the years of since incorporation (and possibly through the biggest home-building
period in Medina).
Figure 1: Structural Coverage Allowance in R-20 Since City Incorporation
In contrast to some of these sweeping code regulations of the past, the last two or three years have seen
ordinances that move away from the such a formula -approach to large house problems. Examples
include the restructuring of the of the 60% rule for remodeling old homes, the rejection of the side setback
formula proposal, and the upcoming nonforming envelops recommendation which looks at remodeling
9 Page 4
ITEM I -1
•
allowances for homes grandfathered into setbacks or above height restrictions. The addition of site plan
review to target neighbor compatibility problems on a case by case basis (if they even exist) would be a
good complement to these other recent regulatory changes. I selected the new recommended lot size
trigger of 40,000 square feet because below this size, setbacks consume a significant portion of the lot
and the buildable envelope is not big enough for site plan review to be effective.
Taking an even broader look at the regulation of home construction, the City Council may also wish to
consider repealing the Construction Mitigation Program in conjunction with adoption of site plan review.
Without question, some good ideas for mitigation measure have come from the Construction Mitigation
Program but the process also takes a great deal of time for applicants. Also, in some respects, it's simply
more efficient to let the contractor devise his/her own construction logistics plans with the knowledge of
certain consequences such the fine for parking and staging construction vehicles in the right-of-way. I
would be happy to elaborate on these ideas with the Council, either in the context of site plan review or as
a stand alone project.
Next Steps
To date the only comment letter the City has received is from Michael Stanley representing the Cascade
Trust and dated March 30, 2005. Mr. Stanley suggests some various changes to the ordinance. I believe
most of them could be accomplished with minimal impact to the effectiveness of the ordinance. I would
also mention, though, that it appears as though Mr. Stanley may be responding to trigger language
contained in an earlier draft of the ordinance — Section 2-A previously started with "Site Plan Review is
required to construct, alter, or reconstruct a structure ..." The word "structure" has been changed to
"building" in the current draft.
In conclusion the adoption of site plan review would represent a new kind of regulation for the City of
Medina but I believe it is well suited to our situation, especially after all of my recent contacts with other
planners. If the City Council is still concerned about this new approach one option would be to assemble a
task force of architects who have been working in the community and request their input on means and
ends with the tear down redevelopment problem. Also, I have a significant bibliography on the topic of
teardown redevelopment if anyone is interested in further reading.
Page 5
ITEM I — la
• CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. XXX — SITE PLAN REVIEW
SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND INTENT
A. Encourage better site planning to help ensure that new development enhances the
character of the city and sensitively fits into neighborhoods.
B. To protect the desirable aspects of natural landscape features of the City by
minimizing undesirable impacts of proposed developments on the physical
environment.
C. Improve communication and mutual understanding among developers,
neighborhoods, and the City early and throughout the Site Plan Review process.
SECTION 2. SITE PLAN REVIEW REQUIRED
A. Site Plan Review is required to construct, alter, or reconstruction a building where:
1. Total parcel size is greater than or equal to 80,000 square feet
B. Exemptions: The following types of development shall be exempt from Site Plan
Review:
Interior remodels of existing buildings or structures provided:
a. Alterations do not conflict with any prior approved site plan; and
b. Alterations do not modify the existing site layout.
2. Fagade modifications of existing buildings or structures provided:
a. Alterations do not conflict with any prior approved site plan; and
b. Alterations do not modify the existing site layout;
c. Alterations do not significantly increase the exterior bulk of the building or
structure.
SECTION 3. DECISION CRITERIA FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
A. The Planning Commission shall review all development subject to Site Plan
Review. The scope of site plan review is intended to evaluate the placement of
primary site features on the site and reduce negative impacts to adjacent
properties. This may involve the requirement for a building to be setback from a
property line by a greater distance than required by the standard Zoning Code
0 setbacks. Changes in the shape of a building footprint will not be required
Site Plan Review Ordinance, April 5, 2005 draft
ITEM I — la
through site plan review unless unique circumstances related to the configuration
of the subject lot and surrounding lots cause the reviewing body to make a
finding that objectives 1 and 2 from below cannot be met solely through changes
to the placement of a building. Primary site features shall include but not be
limited to all buildings, driveways, decks, patios, and landscaping. The following
objectives shall be satisfied before the Planning Commission approves a Site
Plan Review application:.
1. Proposed development shall be sited, within the zoning envelope in such as
way as to not create excessive visible bulk from the perspective of the
neighboring houses. Siting preferences of the applicant shall be considered.
2. Proposed development shall not create significant privacy impacts for
neighboring lots.
3. Preservation of landscape in its natural state by minimizing grade changes
and vegetation and soil removal.
a. The natural topography of the property shall not be dramatically altered.
b. Reasonable efforts shall be required to preserve existing trees that are at
least 24 inches diameter breast height, and other natural landscaping.
"Diameter breast height" is defined in Medina Municipal Code Chapter
12.28.
4. If applicable, the site plan shall include site placement measures to
accommodate large gatherings and mitigate the impacts (traffic, parking,
noise, exterior lighting etc.) on the neighborhood.
5. If applicable, proposed site plan shall include measures to accommodate all
domestic employees and groundskeepers and to mitigate the impacts (traffic,
parking, noise, etc.) on the neighborhood.
B. Proposed Site Plans must also comply with all other Medina Municipal Code,
state, federal, and county requirements.
SECTION 4. SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURE
A. A pre -application conference is required for all projects requiring Site Plan Review.
The pre -application process shall include City of Medina staff and applicant.
B. A Public Notice shall be posted and distributed to residents living within 300 feet of
the proposed development fifteen (15) days prior to the Site Plan Review Hearing.
C. Planning Commission Meeting -- Site Plan Review Hearing
1. The Planning Commission shall review the proposed Site Plan.
2. At the Site Plan Review Hearing, applicants shall present the following
information:
a. An initial site analysis addressing site opportunities and constraints, the use of
all adjacent buildings, and the zoning of the site and adjacent properties;
Site Plan Review Ordinance, April 5, 2005 draft 2
ITEM I — la
b.
A drawing of existing site conditions, indicating topography of the site and the
location of structures and prominent landscape elements on or abutting the
site (including but not limited to all trees that are at least 24 inches diameter
breast height, with species indicated. "Diameter breast height" is defined in
Medina Municipal Code Chapter 12.28.
c.
Preliminary floor plans indicating the general location of public rooms and
private rooms.
d.
Photos showing the facades of adjacent development, trees on the site,
general streetscape character and territorial or other views from the site, if
any;
e.
A graphical depiction of the property's zoning envelope — the three-
dimensional space confined by the maximum building height and all
applicable setback requirements from the zoning code;
f.
A description of the proponent's objectives with regard to site development.
g.
Architectural renderings of the proposed primary residence from the
perspective of each home on an abutting property coupled with photographs
of existing conditions from the same perspectives.
3. Planning Commission shall review all public comments during the Site Plan
Review Hearing
4. Upon reviewing the Site Plan and receiving all public comments, the Planning
Commission will close the hearing and determine one of the following:
a. Approve the Site Plan as submitted;
b. Approve the Site Plan as submitted with conditions; or
1) The Planning Commission shall have the authority to place reasonable
conditions on or modify a Site Plan in order to satisfy the criteria set forth
in Section 3. Such conditions or modifications may include, but are not
limited to, screening, buffering, building location and orientation, setbacks,
paving, landscaping, vegetation removal, grading, and other mitigation as
appropriate.
2) The Planning Commission may impose additional requirements including:
preparation of a grading, drainage, and erosion control plan, and
preparation of a vegetation preservation plan.
3) Modification of Plan Subsequent to Site Plan Review: In all cases, if an
applicant can demonstrate that a Site Plan can be made consistent with
the review criteria by alternative modifications to the Site Plan, the
Planning Commission shall accept the alternative modifications as
conditions to approval and approve the Site Plan.
c. Reject the Site Plan. If Planning Commission finds that the Site Plan
application cannot be made consistent with the review criteria by reasonable
conditions, then the Site Plan shall be denied.
D. Second Planning Commission Meeting. Site Plan Review applicants shall have the
option to have the project reviewed at two Planning Commission meetings. This
procedure would utilize the first meeting as the publicly noticed hearing at which the
Planning Commission would consider preliminary approval of a site plan concept.
The second meeting would occur after the substantial completion of all design
activities and would involve Planning Commission review of whether the final design
is consistent with their concept plan approval. At the second meeting, the Planning
Site Plan Review Ordinance, April 5, 2005 draft 3
ITEM I — la
Commission shall approve a revised site plan if it finds that the proposed designs and
Is any revisions meet the intent of the original Planning Commission approval.
Additional location criteria may not be required by the Planning Commission unless
the applicant seeks to modify the original Planning Commission approval.
E. Review Consolidation with Level 2 Construction Mitigation. When a project
undergoing Site Plan Review is also required to develop a Level 2 construction
mitigation plan per MMC 15.20, the Planning Commission Site Plan Review meeting
may be expanded to allow for the review and approval of the mitigation plan.
F. Expiration of Site Plan Approval. The final approval of a Site Plan shall expire within
two (2) years of the date of approval if a complete building permit application is not
submitted.
G. Review Consolidation with Variance Requests. Where a variance is sought for a
project also requiring Site Plan Review, the applicant shall have the option to request
that the review of both permits is consolidated into a single public hearing before the
Planning Commission.
SECTION 5. REVISION OF SITE PLAN
A. The Site Plan may be revised by the applicant from time to time. Modifications
may be made by agreement between the applicant and the City Manager or City
Manager's designee, provided:
0 1. Future Development. In making the determination under Section 4, the
Planning Commission may consider the likelihood of additions, expansions,
or further activity being planned by the applicant.
2. Public notice of the proposed revision(s) is posted as provided by MMC
14.04.130 and mailed to adjacent property within 300 feet of the project at
least fifteen (15) days prior to approval or denial of the proposed revisions;
3. In the absence of an agreement, the proposed revision shall be submitted to
the Medina Planning Commission which shall review the application as if it
were a proposal for approval of a new site plan.
SECTION 6. APPEAL
A. Any aggrieved party may appeal an administrative or Medina Planning
Commission decision, which grants or denies approval of a final Site Plan
Review application, to the Medina Hearing Examiner. Notice of appeal must be
filed with the Medina City Clerk within fourteen (14) days of the date the notice of
decision to grant or deny the final Site Plan Review application. The time for
appeal shall be extended for an additional seven (7) days if the decision includes
a determination subject to a SEPA public comment period as required by WAC
197-11-340. (Ord. 710 § 1, 2001; Ord. 608 § 2, 1996)
SECTION 7. ENFORCEMENT
It is the property owner's responsibility to ensure that all work, actions or
conditions comply with this code and all other applicable laws and with the
Site Plan Review Ordinance, April 5, 2005 draft 4
ITEM I —1 a
requirements of any permits and/or approvals granted under this ordinance or
any other applicable law, regardless of any review, approval, inspection or other
action of the City or its agents, consultants, or employees. It shall be the
responsibility of the City Manager or City Manager's designee to enforce the
provisions of this ordinance or any approved Site Plan or revisions thereto.
SECTION S. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES
A. Violations
1. It is a violation of this ordinance for any person to use, construct or allow any
structure within the City of Medina that violates any of the provisions of this
ordinance.
2. It is a violation of this ordinance for any person to fail to comply with the terms of
an approved Site Plan Review Application or any revisions thereto.
B. Notice of Violation
If, after investigation, the City's Representative determines that the standards or
requirements of this ordinance or any approved Site Plan Review application or
revisions thereto have been violated, the City's Representative shall serve notice of
violation upon the owner, contractor or other person responsible for the condition. The
notice of violation shall state separately each standard or requirement violated; shall
state what corrective action, if any, is necessary to comply with the standards or
requirements; and shall set a reasonable time for compliance. The notice shall be
served upon the owner, contractor or other person responsible for the condition by
personal service or certified mail with return receipt requested, addressed to the last
known address of such person. A copy of the notice shall be posted at a conspicuous
place on the property containing the site of the violation. A notice -may be amended at
any time to correct clerical errors or ate additional authority for a stated violation.
C. Civil Penalty
In addition to any other sanction or remedial procedure, which may be available,
any person violating or failing to comply with the provisions of this ordinance shall
be subject to a cumulative penalty in the amount of $500 per day for each
violation from the date set for compliance. The penalty imposed by this section
shall be collected by civil action brought in the name of the City.
D. Criminal Penalties
Any person violating or failing to comply with any of the provisions of this
ordinance shall be subject to criminal prosecution and upon conviction shall be
fined in a sum not exceeding $1,000 or be imprisoned for a term not exceeding
thirty (30) days or be both fined and imprisoned. Each day of noncompliance with
the provisions of this ordinance shall constitute a separate offense.
E. Stop Work Order
I* Whenever a continuing violation of this ordinance occurs, the City's
Representative may issue a Stop Work Order, with or without notice, specifying
Site Plan Review Ordinance, April 5, 2005 draft 5
ITEM I — la
•
the violation and prohibiting any work or other activity at the site. A failure to
comply with a Stop Work Order shall constitute a violation of this ordinance.
F. Additional Relief
The City may seek legal or equitable relief to enjoin any acts or practices and
abate any conditions, which constitute or will constitute a violation of this
ordinance.
Site Plan Review Ordinance, April 5, 2005 draft 6
l'
Design Review
How's it working in Washington?
Design review by local governments has be-
come increasingly common throughout the
country since the 1980s. Design review is the
local government practice of examining public
and private projects for their design, aesthetic
or urban design quality, and compatibility with
nearby development. Design review focuses on
the appearance of new construction, site plan-
ning, and such concerns as landscaping, signage,
and other aesthetic issues. Most large cities in
Washington State have a design review program,
generally focusing on new commercial and mul-
tifamily development. Quite a few smaller
communities have established design review
programs as well.
Design review is common for downtown devel-
opment, development in historic districts, and
for projects within certain transportation corri-
dors. In many communities, design review is
administered by an appointed design review
board of volunteers that includes architects, land-
scape architects, developers, urban designers,
and other design professionals. Some commu-
nities have administrative design review, which
is handled by city planning or urban design staff.
There are many reasons why communities en-
act design review programs. In some older
established communities, the interest is in en-
suring the compatibility of new development with
existing character. Design review can help to
enhance desirable pedestrian characteristics and
the aesthetic quality of the streetscape. An-
other reason for design review is to avoid
monotony in new construction. Design review
is sometimes used to create an identity or a
particular physical character in an area of new
development.
Legal Issues Until 1993, there were no Wash-
ington appellate cases ruling on the validity of
design review ordinances. That year, the Wash-
ington State. Court of Appeals decided in
Anderson v. Issaquah, 70 Wn. App. 64, 82
(1993), that Issaquah's design review regula-
tions were invalid due to vagueness. It found
the guidelines deficient because they did not
give meaningful guidance to the applicant or the
design review board. The court affirmed the le-
gitimacy of design review by stating that
"aesthetic standards are an appropriate compo-
nent of land use governance." The issue of how
far a city may go in regulating design is far from
settled, and it is important for communities to
develop meaningful, clear design standards. In
light of the Issaquah case, MRSC strongly ad-
vises cities, towns, and counties to review their
proposed design review program and criteria with
their attorney's office.
Design review should follow a step-by-step pro-
cess to ensure that it is fairly and consistently
conducted. A community should develop its
design guidelines before beginning to review in-
dividual development projects. Typically a
community publishes design review informational
materials available to the public. Design review
guidelines include both graphics and text to il-
lustrate the characteristics of the desired
development design. Sometimes these guide-
lines are developed with the assistance of an
urban design consultant. A city's planning com-
mission is often involved in the development
continued on page 3
for excellence in local government
M
•
Design Review continued from page 1
and fine tuning of local design review stan-
dards and guidelines.
Although the Washington State Growth
Management Act does not mandate a de-
sign element as a required part of a
comprehensive plan, quite a few commu-
nities have adopted urban design elements
of their plans. These elements can be use-
ful as a first step in developing local design
guidelines. Compre-
hensive plans that
contain design ele-
ments include Bothell's
urban design element,
Edmonds' community '{
culture and urban de-
sign element,
Kirkland's community`
character element, and
Bellingham, Gig Har-
bor, Puyallup, and
Woodinville's commu-
nity design elements.
Projects Subject to
Design Review Design
review has evolved from
the practice of reviewing
building design in des-
ignated historic districts to reviewing a wide
range of new development projects. De-
sign review has been used for many years
in historic districts and in reviewing changes
to designated historic structures. Land-
marks and historic district boards typically
review changes to historic structures for
compatibility with important designated fea-
tures of a building and buildings within a
historic district. Many historic preserva-
tion guidelines for design review are based
on "The Secretary of the Interior's Stan-
dards for the Treatment of Historic
Properties." Most preservation boards have
adapted these standards by developing
their own guidelines for changes to historic
properties.
The types of development that are subject
to design review vary from community to
community. Most design review programs
address commercial and multifamily de-
velopment of a certain size. Many
communities, including Seattle, Kirkland,
Bellingham, Vancouver, Burien, University
Place, and Walla Walla, have developed
design guidelines that address the charac-
ter of downtown development. These guide-
lines address the image of downtown and
may include preserving existing "Main
Street" character or the development of a
desired new identity for the town center.
Some cities have developed special design
guidelines to address big -box retail devel-
opment, such as Wal-Mart, Costco, Home
Depot, and other warehouse -type commer-
cial development. The city of Sequim has
established design standards and guide-
Sumner Fred Meyer Development by Sienna Architecture. Photo pro-
vided by city of Sumner
lines for large retail developments. Fort
Collins, Colorado was one of the early lead-
ers in addressing the design impacts of
big -box retail development. Sumner is one
of relatively few communities that has de-
veloped design review standards for new
industrial development. Sumner decided
to review industrial projects because the
city annexed 1,000 acres of new, indus-
trially zoned land.
In recent years, with the advent of mega -
houses and "McMansions," some
communities have adopted design review
for single-family development. This seems
to be a more common trend in California
and Arizona than in the Northwest. Rather
than reviewing all new, single-family de-
velopment in a community, these
single-family guidelines are typically tailored
to specific situations, including unique lot
conditions such as steep slopes, transi-
tional areas adjacent to other, more
intensive uses, and other special circum-
stances. Washington's Growth Management
Act encourages higher densities in cities,
and more people are living in close prox-
imity, which has resulted in a growing con-
cern about design aspects of new
development. In Washington, Sumner has
developed single-family residential design
guidelines that encourage neo-traditional
single-family development, which is con-
sistent with the community character
element of its comprehensive plan. Gig
Harbor has prepared standards for single-
family housing design that de-emphasize
garages located in the front of houses and
encourage the location of garages behind
houses.
Sumner won a Vision 2020 award from
the Puget Sound Regional Council for its
neo-traditional Daffodil neighborhood, which
includes live -work spaces in a light indus-
trial area. These artist loft -type units have
been extremely popular.
Another trend in design review is in the
development of specific standards for a
particular neighborhood. This can work
especially well in an area that has an es-
tablished design character, or an area that
needs special attention, such as a neigh-
borhood commercial district. Subarea or
neighborhood plans can help to establish
broader design policies and principles for
an area's streetscape or the relationship to
a major urban park. In Seattle, a subarea
plan for Ballard's municipal center has
helped to define design and streetscape
standards for private projects in the vicin-
ity.
The typical content of design guidelines
varies depending on the type of develop-
ment Ding reviewed and the specific needs
in a particular community. Generally, some
standards address site planning and lay-
out, including such issues as streetscape
compatibility, relationship to adjacent sites,
parking location and access, and location
of open space. Other standards address
the specific architectural elements of build-
ing design, such as architectural concept,
building form, massing and bulk, building
articulation and modulation, consistency,
human scale, and exterior building materi-
als. Other standards involve pedestrian
features, safety, crime prevention through
environmental design (CPTED), and land-
scaping. Design guidelines also address
scale issues and transitions for projects
abutting less intensive development, such
continued on page 4
Municipal Research News — Summer 2004 . 3
Design Review continued from page 3
as single-family zoning adjacent to a mixed -
use commercial and multifamily zone.
10I have served as a design review board
member in Seattle for four years. One of
the most successful features of Seattle's
design review program is an allowance for
design departures. The design review pro-
cess allows developers and city staff
Working with the design review board to
negotiate departures from the strict appli-
cation of the land use code to produce a
better building. This provides an incen-
tive for some developers to participate in
design review when their project would not
meet the size threshold that triggers re-
quired design review. Design departures
have resulted in the inclusion of special
amenities to provide more light into open
space, include public art, and add land-
scaping, such as green roofs, and other
features that take advantage of the particu-
lar characteristics of a site or location.
Design departures can lead to creativity,
innovation, and positive tradeoffs in siting
and designing buildings for a particular site.
Another aspect of Seattle's design review
rogram that receives accolades is the in-
clusion of an "early design guidance"
meeting. This meeting is a forum where
the neighbors, design review board mem-
bers, and the project proponent offer
suggestions about how the project can best
fit with the neighborhood context and to
identify key factors and issues to be ad-
dressed in the project's design. Kirkland
has a similar two -stage design process that
involves early design guidance.
In Seattle, more than 800 projects have
gone through the design review process
since the program's inception in 1993.
Some of the most successful designs that
have resulted from the Seattle program have
been low-income housing projects. One
possible explanation is that the low-income
housing developers are long-term property
owners, and they want to construct build-
ings that are durable, made of high quality
materials, and are relatively inexpensive to
maintain. One example of positive collabo-
ration between the owner, developer,
rchitect, design review board, and the
community is the University of
Washington's Radford Court housing in
northeast Seattle near Magnusson Park
designed by Mithun. This attractive, in-
novative design represents more than
double the density of the past student hous-
ing on the site.
Administrative Design Review vs. De-
sign Review Boards Communities such
as Bellevue and Federal Way have an ad-
ministrative design review process that is
handled by planning staff instead of an
appointed design review board. Bellevue
has been doing administrative design re-
view for about 20 years. Ina recent focus
group to discuss design review, participants
indicated a preference for continuing
Bellevue's administrative program rather
than appointing a volunteer design review
board. Administrative design review is gen-
erally less costly than a volunteer program
and is simpler to administer. Because the
same core group of staff works on design
review, there may be more consistency in
administrative design review decisions than
in those by a volunteer board whose mem-
bers change on a regular basis. In Federal
Way, minor changes to commercial, multi-
family, and institutional buildings are
subject to design review, whereas in Se-
attle, which has design review boards, there
is a higher threshold for the type and size
Radford Court, University of Washington graduate student housing, by
Mithun. Photo by Carol Tobin
of new construction that will trigger design
review. In Bellevue, one of the benefits of
the administrative design review process
is that staffs from different departments,
including transportation, fire, utilities, and
land use, work together as a team. This
team approach to design review minimizes
conflicts between departments and results
in a consistent application of design prin-
ciples.
Some of the advantages of an appointed
citizen review board include increased cred-
ibility and visibility for design review in the
community, more ability to provide flex-
ibility, such as through a design departure
process, and increased richness of input
and viewpoint. In some smaller commu-
nities, the planning commission may serve
as the local design review board adminis-
tering the design guidelines.
Gig Harbor's design review process is an
intriguing blend of the administrative and
volunteer board approach. Gig Harbor's
design review guidelines were adopted by
the city in 1996 following the Anderson v.
Issaquah decision, and the city developed
very specific language to address the court's
concerns about the vagueness of the
Issaquah guidelines. Gig Harbor has a
streamlined approach for projects that fol-
low the specific language, setbacks, and
design details of the city's design manual.
Projects that meet the written guidelines
are reviewed administratively by city staff.
If a developer wishes to deviate from the
city's guidelines, he or she can appeal to
the city's design review
board, which has the
authority to allow other
approaches that meet
the intent of the guide-
lines. One successful
large project in Gig Har-
bor is a development
called "Gig Harbor
North," a recently an-
nexed area that now
includes an Albertson's
store and a Target.
These establishments
have an architectural
presence on the
streetfront that is quite
different from a typical
suburban store with
parking in front. At Gig
Harbor North, most parking is located be-
hind the structures.
Kirkland started its design review program
about 10 years ago with an administrative
review process, and the city now has a
design review board that looks at develop-
ment in downtown, and in certain
commercial neighborhoods. Unlike Seattle's
4 * Municipal Research News — Summer 2004
process, in which the director of the De-
partment of Planning and Development has
the final decision on design review, the fi-
al design decision in Kirkland is made by
board. Kirkland has an administrative
sign review process for minor changes
and for projects outside these commercial
districts.
Concluding Comments It is extremely
important that design guidelines be spe-
cific and follow certain clearly articulated
principles. Design review cannot involve
any arbitrary decision making, and it must
be consistently applied.
One of the development community's ma-
jor concerns about design review is the
issue of timeliness. The time involved in
the review process can have a huge effect
on a project's schedule and the profitabil-
ity of a development project. When design
review can increase certainty and be ac-
complished within a reasonable time
period, it is much easier to sell the idea to
developers and builders. With design re-
view, sometimes a developer and architect
will need to spend more time in the early
phase of a project to meet design require-
ments, but they may save time in the long
run because a project that is subject to
design review is more likely to be accept-
able to the larger community and may
cause fewer legal appeals.
Some design review boards can spend ex-
orbitant amounts of time analyzing the
minutia of a project, such as signage, build-
ing materials, and colors. Design review
boards need to carefully evaluate projects
based on local design guidelines, but not
agonize over minor details of a project.
Design guidelines should mesh with a
community's land use code to allow flex-
ibility to accommodate good design while
maintaining consistent standards and to
provide incentives for infill and creative site
design.
As many communities are implementing
design review programs, there is interest
in a forum for discussing the experience
and providing training to new board mem-
bers. This is especially important in small -
and medium-sized communities where
there are fewer design professionals avail-
able to serve on a design review board. If
you are interested in working with other
communities on design review issues, con-
tact Jeremy McMahan at Kirkland
(jmcmahan@ci.kirkland-wa.us or 425-
828-1141).
Design review is a delicate balancing act,
looking at community aesthetic issues in
light of the public interest, while encourag-
ing good design. Design review is more of
an art than a science, but it must be based
on sound, clearly articulated design prin-
ciples and on a process that is fair and
open.
Thanks are due to the following individu-
als for sharing their design review
comments: Patti Wilma - Bellevue, Patrick
Doherty - Federal Way, Steve Osguthoroe
— Gig Harbor, Angela Ruggieri and Jer-
emy McMahan - Kirkland, Vince Lyons -
Seattle, John Doan — Sumner, and Mark
Hinshaw — LMN Architects.)
By Carol Tobin
Public Policy Consultant
Municipal Research and Services Center
•
Medina City Council
City of Medina
501 Evergreen Point Road
Medina, WA 98039
Proposed Site Plan Review Ordinance
Dear City Councilmembers:
On behalf of Cascade Trust, I'd like to offer some suggestions to improve the
proposed Site Plan Review Ordinance recently referred to the Council by the Planning
Commission. We arewell aware of the history of the proposed ordinance and hope
that the ordinance, if implemented, will ensure the best possible alignment between
the applicant needs and those of the community. What follows are s I I
same general
comments on the ordinance followed by some, specific recommendations based on the
current wording of ordinance.
First, we recommend that the Council carefully examine the administrative burden of
,the ordinance, The jurisdiction's permit process is already a lengthy and costly
process, and the proposed procedures will no doubt greatly increase both. We urge
you to examine the proposed ordinance to ensure both the time and expense of the
process are limited to the minimum necessary to meet the stated goals. We also urge
you, to examine methods to expedite the process if it is clear the proposed development
clearly :meets the intent of the ordinance.
We also believe the ordinance should recognize, encourage and reward voluntary
120 7 Third Avenue actions that clearly advance the goals of the ordinance. For example, there might be
incentives to eliminate non-confort-nities, save significant trees or increase building
Su ite 2350 setbacks. Such incentives could be in the form of some level of relief from Site Plan
review or from the height restrictions that encourage long low structures.
Seattle, Washington Along similar lines, the ordinance could be greatly improved if provisions were
included to allow some flexibility on the approved site plan once it has been approved.
991 of
As currently written, the site plan review process must be repeated for any new
development on the site of if a period of time passes before the oni ginal plan is
implemented. The ordinance would be much more effective if it allowed some limited
628-7 105 flexibility for smaller projects and allowed for an administrative extension of the plan,
X
within reasonable limits., should the owner need more time to execute the project.
Medina City Council and Planning Commission.
March 30, 2005
Page 2
Following the example used for large institutions in the region, once the plan is
approved it serves as a guide that allows for the -natural adjustments that occur over
time as needs change.
Since this ordinance targets a. very limited number of large parcels in Medina, we feel
it is of critical importance that public treatment of these projects respect the privacy
and.security concerns of those owners. We urge you to provide some reasonable
expectation of privacy concerning these projects and limit the formal public disclosure
of the designs to those necessary to fulfill the spirit of the ordinance. For example, it
is not clear why an owner should be required to submit floor plans for a review
process that is intended to address the relationship to a structure to neighboring
properties.
Attached is a summary of specific recommendations to support these improvements,
We would be glad to discuss these with you at any time.
Very truly yours,
cc: Ellen Conedera Dial, Trustee
Elizabeth Korrell
I-xv Dw
Comments on the proposed Site Plan Review Ordinance-.
Section L Purpose and Intent
Add the following:
c. Shall be limited to location and bulk. of structures on the site and shall specifically avoid
aesthetic and other forms of design review.
d. Shall be limited to exterior features of the proposed development only and be mindful of
the applicant's reasonable expectation of privacy and/or security concerns.
Section 2. Site Plan Review Required.
Add the following under exemptions-
3. Structures or modifications to structures that eliminate significant non -conforming
elements of existing structures.
4. Small Accessory structures as such as playhouses, trellises and the like, as defined in
MMC 17.49.010.
5. Accessory Buildings loss 750 square feet.
Section 4. Site Plan Review Procedure.
Add the following:
Insert new paragraph B.
B. At the pre -application conference, City Staff shall review the applicability of this
ordinance to the proposed project and, if appropriate, refer the project to Site Plan
Review. If referred to Site Plan review, City Staff shalldefine applicable elements of the
Site Flan Review Hearing presentation by the applicant. (renumber remaining
paragraphs)
C.2 c Delete "preliminary floor plans" and replace with either ",conceptual layout/adjacency
diagrams 17
G.. Add the following at the conclusion: °"The applicant may request an extension to an existing
Site Plan Approval provided they can demonstrate (1) reasonable expectation the project will
proceed and (2) that the plan need not be revised per Section 5. Such an extension will be
administrative and responsibility for such an extension shall, made by the City Manager or City
Manager's designee."
I*
ITEM J -1
CITY OF MEDINA
City Manager's Office
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
www.medina-wa.gov
►, 14 ►t s ZT.11 Z I D
DATE: April 6, 2005
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager
RE: 2005 Budget Amendment No. 1
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached ordinance amending the 2005 Budget to appropriate
funds for the 50th Anniversary celebration and for the police canine
program.
POLICY IMPLICATION: The City Council previously approved the expenditure of up to $25,000 for
the 50th Anniversary Celebration and acceptance of a gift of start up costs
for a police canine unit program. A budget amendment is required to
appropriate funds in the 2005 Budget.
BACKGROUND: Funding for the 50th Anniversary celebration expenditures will require the
use of General Fund ending fund balance in the amount of $25,000. The
2005 Budget was adopted with a projected ending fund balance of
$1,942,097.
Funding for the Police Canine Program expenditures will require the use of
General Fund ending fund balance in the amount of $75,000 and use of
General Fund revenues from donations and contributions in the amount of
$28, 720 for a total of $103, 720.
0
•
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 781, dated December 13,
2004, the 2005 BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The following amendments are made to the 2005 Budget for the City of
Medina.
FUND
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
General Fund
$45,000.00
Increased Wages/Salaries
and Benefits Additional for
Police Officer position.
$281,720.00
Supplies, training, equipment
and misc. costs for Police
Canine Unit.
$25,000.00
Increased Professional
Services for 50th Anniversary
Event Planning/Celebration
Equipment Replacement
$30,000.00
Replacement of Police
Vehicle.
Total Budget Amendment
$1281720.00
SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to make any transfers necessary to carry out
the terms of this ordinance.
SECTION 3. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect five (5) days after its
publication or the publication of a summary of its intent and contents.
PASSED BY AT LEAST ONE MORE THAN A MAJORITY OF THE CITY
COUNCIL ON THIS I 1 th DAY OF APRIL, 2005, AND SIGNED IN AUTHENTICATION
OF ITS PASSAGE THE 1 Ith DAY OF APRIL 2005.
Approved as to form:
Wayne D. Tanaka, City Attorney
Attest:
Mary Odermat, Mayor
Randy Reed, CMC, City Clerk
ORD. 777 - I
•
•
•
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Medina, Washington
On APRIL 11, 2005, the City Council of the City of Medina, Washington, adopted
Ordinance No. , the main points of which are summarized by its title as follows:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 7819 2005 BUDGET FOR
THE CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON.
The full text of this ordinance will be mailed upon request.
APPROVED by the City Council at their meeting of APRIL 11, 2005.
ORD. 777
Randy Reed, CMC, City Clerk
2
ITEM J -1 b
CITY OF MEDINA
Police Department
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.1332
www.medina-wa.gov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 6, 2005
TO: Doug Schulze, City Manager
FROM: Jeffrey Chen, Police Chief
RE: 2005 Budget Amendment for Canine Unit Program
RECOMMENDATION: Request 2005 Budget Amendment of $103,720 for Police K-9 Unit
program.
BACKGROUND: During the March 14, 2005 City Council meeting, by a majority vote, a
decision was made to accept a donation of a police canine (K-9) unit from
one of our citizens. The gift includes all start-up costs associated with the
acquisition, basic equipment and training of the K-9 Unit (Canine/Handler).
Please find the attached spreadsheet that details all of the costs associated
with the start up of this K-9 program.
A Medina resident will donate all of the start up costs $28,720. The city's
portion for the K-9 unit would be half of a year's salary and benefits
($45,000) for the handler beginning July 1, 2005 and a utility vehicle
($30,000) for a sum of $75,000.
The total amount of the budget amendment requested is $103,720.
Selection of type of Vehicle for K-9 Unit: For maximum flexibility and
benefit, the police department has opted to select the use of a 4X4 utility
type vehicle versus the standard police cruiser sedan for reasons to
include:
1) Due to the limited size of the Medina police force, there is a strong
likelihood there will be times when the K-9 unit may be called to
transport prisoners or citizens. This can only be accomplished
through the use of multi -purpose utility vehicle with the rear
compartment reserved for the police K-9.
•
•
•
• Page 2
2) The resale or auction value of a utility vehicle is much higher than
that of a patrol vehicle once the vehicle needs to be
decommissioned.
3) In the event of in climate weather such as snow, icy conditions or
partially obstructed roadways, the utility vehicle would be better
suited to navigate and respond to emergencies.
4) The cost of a basic utility vehicle is just under $30,000. The cost of
a fully marked police cruiser is also around $30,000. Therefore, the
cost difference between the two vehicles is insignificant.
POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE: In the short term, we could convert one
of our older patrol cars for use as the K-9 vehicle to get us through the end
of the year, but it must be recognized that this patrol car won't last past
2005. The issue here would be; do we attempt to outfit one of our older
patrol cars knowing the car will not last past 2005 and then have to expend
more money for additional equipment that will not be transferable from a
patrol car to the utility vehicle we will ultimately add to our fleet in 2006?
It would seem to make better sense financially and tactically to purchase
the utility vehicle and realize the costs up front. From a practical and
business perspective, we should strive to do it right the first time.
•
•
•
Police Canine Program Costs
Item
Cost
Dog
$10,600
Vehicle Outfitting (K-9 compatible, cage, Computer, etc)
$13,000
K-9 outfitting
$1,500
Home Kennel
$400
Training Sleeve
$150
Cost of Training
$750
Muzzle
$140
Tracking Harness
$60
Strobe Light
$30
30' Tracking Lead
$35
6' Lead
$15
1' Lead
$10
Collars (2) $15 each
$30
Incidental Expenses Food Vet etc
$2,000
Full Time Employee
Vehicle(Chevrolet Tahoe
Total Start Up Costs: $281720
Based on start date of
07/01 /05 including
benefits, education,
deferred comp.
$45,000
$30,000
Total Cost of K-9 program: $103,720
Police Canine Program Funding
Item Amount
Donations/contributions $ 35,000
General Fund $ 68,720
Total Funding Sources: $ 103,720
ITEM J - 2
x CITY OF MEDINA
k City Manager's Office
501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.454.9222
www.modina-wa.gov
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 6, 2005
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Doug Schulze, City Manager
RE: Authorize Survey Consultant Agreement
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize City Manager to enter into an Agreement with PRR, Inc. for
consulting services related to a community survey.
POLICY IMPLICATION: The 2005 Budget does not include funding for this project so City Council
authorization of the Agreement is required as well as a future budget
amendment.
BACKGROUND: The firms of PRR, Inc. and Carolyn Browne Associates were interviewed
following the March City Council meeting. Based on the submitted
responses to the Request for Qualifications and the interviews, PRR, Inc.
has been selected as the best qualified consultant for this project.
PRR, Inc. has provided more detailed information regarding their proposal
and estimated costs for various options to consider (see attachment). The
attachment is provided to give the City Council a better understanding of
the approach suggested by PRR, Inc. There is no need for the City
Council to take action on the PRR proposal at this time.
The next step for this project to move forward is to enter into a contract with
a consultant. The City Council will then meet with the consultant during the
April 25t" Study Session to discuss project scoping and identify survey
topics. The project timeline estimates a period of ten weeks for the final
product to be delivered, which is currently the first week of July, if the
project scoping and topic identification is completed April 25, 2005.
A professional services agreement will be drafted by the City Attorney
based on the proposed project work plan submitted by PRR, Inc., if the City
Council authorizes the City Manager to enter into such an agreement. The
agreement will be drafted with a not to exceed cost of $24,110, which will
give the City Council flexibility to select the option(s) that best meet the
needs and expectations for the survey.
11
•
Public Opinion Survey
NPRR was founded in 1981 to serve clients in the area of public affairs, research,
marketing, and information services. Its thirty-seven person, award -winning
staff has directed thousands of research, community relations and public information
programs. PRR focuses on providing our clients with services that inform, engage, and
empower them with the data they need for good decision -making. Because we offer the full
range of research and public involvement services we have the unique capacity and track -
record to develop creative citizen input tools to assess the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors
of diverse constituencies.
Purpose
The community survey will help the City of Medina understand the opinions, needs and
preferences of the population it serves so that resources can be best utilized and so that
decisions will be informed and data -based. A variety of issues can be addressed in the survey
and our team will work with the City of Medina to identify those topic areas of most
importance and assist in prioritizing these for inclusion in the survey.
Approach
Early in the project PRR will meet with the City of Medina to clarify the project's objectives
and determine the project scope. Knowing exactly how the research results may be used will
help us answer key research design questions. It is vital to consider all potential uses of the
data and design an approach that will provide valid and reliable information.
PRR brings extensive training and more importantly, years of experience in the survey
research planning process. Regardless of the topic, each project will entail making good
decisions around issues of sampling, measurement, data analysis, and reporting. It is this
up -front research design phase where we most clearly see research as a unique blend of
science and art. Well -designed survey research is not just the application of technical skills.
Rather, it is the marriage of these technical skills with the ability to see the end result of the
research producing research designs that clearly, reliably and cost-effectively achieve our
clients' goals.
Research must reveal the people behind the statistics. If research doesn't address the right
issues, with the right questions, it won't be helpful. At PRR, we listen to our clients to make
sure they get what they need. And that's answers, not research.
City of Medina Public Opinion Survey PRR, Inc.
2
Data Collection Options
Telephone Survey
PRR has developed and implemented thousands of telephone surveys
using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CAT-1). As our
strategic partner, PRR subcontracts the actual telephone survey fielding
to Pacific Market Research. Pacific Market Research utilizes a team of
approximately 150 data collection specialists trained under Market
Research Association guidelines and uses an 95-station centralized
telephone system networked with CATI interviewing software.
Online Survey
PRR has its own online survey system and has been conducting online
surveys since 1999. Such surveys are hosted on our server. Our online
surveys can be programmed to allow a respondent to complete the survey
only once. An advantage to using an online survey is that respondents can
complete the survey at any time of day at no cost to them. And an online
survey approach allows respondents to take the necessary time to consider
each question and their answers. Additionally, this approach is significantly
less expensive compared to the cost of traditional telephone surveys and has
a higher response rate than mail surveys. Also, research indicates that respondents are
likely to provide more candid answers to online surveys compared to surveys that involve
live interviewers.
An added bonus of using PRR's online survey system is that the City of Medina will be able
0 to view the tabulation of responses to survey questions in real time by logging onto a secure
website. This means that much of the data analysis is done automatically as the data is
collected resulting in cost savings. Finally, by using online surveys the City of Medina is
building the capacity to re -administer the surveys at some time in the future at significantly
reduced cost, thereby allowing for efficient and cost-effective trend analysis. For more detail
about PRR's online survey system go to httl2://www.12rrbiz.-com/services/cust pulse asl2
Mail surveys
Another option for assessing public opinion is the use of a mail -back survey.
PRR has conducted numerous mail -back surveys. In each case PRR has
developed the survey instruments and implemented the survey distribution
process. We often use tri-fold surveys with business -reply postage.
Respondents complete the survey, fold it so that the return address label is
on the outside, and mail it to PRR. PRR then makes use of our strategic
alliance with ConsumerScan to conduct electronic scanning of the surveys for accurate,
cost-effective data entry.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Data Collection Methods
Represents
�iy tpit
h9l±dY
Population
to
Cost
71t»e
Teiepltt i surua s
higher _
M, lum
high
fast
ON! t i* surveys
medium
lbw
low
fast
lai! surveys
medium
low--
medium
slag
City of Medina Public Opinion Survey PRR, Inc.
2
•
Data Collection Options
Telephone Survey
PRR has developed and implemented thousands of telephone surveys
using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI). As our
strategic partner, PRR subcontracts the actual telephone survey fielding
to Pacific Market Research. Pacific Market Research utilizes a team of
approximately 150 data collection specialists trained under Market
Research Association guidelines and uses an 95-station centralized
telephone system networked with CATI interviewing software.
Online Survey
PRR has its own online survey system and has been conducting online
surveys since 1999. Such surveys are hosted on our server. Our online
surveys can be programmed to allow a respondent to complete the survey
only once. An advantage to using an online survey is that respondents can
3 complete the survey at any time of day at no cost to them. And an online
survey approach allows respondents to take the necessary time to consider
each question and their answers. Additionally, this approach is significantly
less expensive compared to the cost of traditional telephone surveys and has
a higher response rate than mail surveys. Also, research indicates that respondents are
likely to provide more candid answers to online surveys compared to surveys that involve
live interviewers.
An added bonus of using PRR's online survey system is that the City of Medina will be able
to view the tabulation of responses to survey questions in real time by logging onto a secure
website. This means that much of the data analysis is done automatically as the data is
collected resulting in cost savings. Finally, by using online surveys the City of Medina is
building the capacity to re -administer the surveys at some time in the future at significantly
reduced cost, thereby allowing for efficient and cost-effective trend analysis. For more detail
about PRR's online survey system go to httl2://www.12rrbiz.com/services/cust pulse asp
Mail surveys
Another option for assessing public opinion is the use of a mail -back survey.
PRR has conducted numerous mail -back surveys. In each case PRR has
4 5
developed the survey instruments and implemented the survey distribution
process. We often use tri-fold surveys with business -reply postage.
Respondents complete the survey, fold it so that the return address label is
on the outside, and mail it to PRR. PRR then makes use of our strategic
alliance with ConsumerScan to conduct electronic scanning of the surveys for accurate,
cost-effective data entry.
Advantages and Disadvanta
of Data Collection Methods
Represents
Population
�`ie" lon. SWry hi her
t3nlicrvey$ medium
lail sves medium
e
Cost
rn lium
high
low
low
low .
medium
cpitier
rl17Te
fasa.
fait
MOW
City of Medina Public Opinion Survey
PRR, Inc.
3
Project Work Plan
• Develop, in collaboration with the City of Medina, a survey designed to measure key
variables related to project goals. The survey will be designed to take either 10 or 12
minutes to complete. Given the variety of topic areas that may be included in the survey
(and the fact that different topic areas may have different numbers of questions
associated with them) it is difficult to estimate the number of topic areas that would be
included in a 10 versus a 12 minute survey. However, based on our past experience, we
would estimate that approximately 30 questions can be included in a 10 minutes surrey
(including demographic questions) and about 35 can be included in a 12 minute survey.
Recent work contained eight topics in a 10 minute survey for the City of Bainbridge
Island and twelve topic areas for South Fidalgo Island.
• Establish a sampling frame for the City of Medina area through the purchase of a
random digit dialing list (to allow for the inclusion of the approximately 40%+ of unlisted
phone numbers) and/or mailing list for mail and online survey options.
• Ensure confidentiality/anonymity to respondents in order to obtain good response rates
and accurate information.
• Include adequate pre -testing to ensure that survey questions are understood and that
the survey is not experienced as an intrusion to respondents.
Consult with City of Medina on methods to make citizens aware of impending survey in
order to increase response rate.
• Field the survey and obtain a minimum of 400 completed surveys, resulting in a margin
of error of ± 4.43 percent (based on a population of 2,195 residents 18 years of age or
older).
• If a telephone survey is used, in order to control for sampling bias at least four attempts
to contact each randomly selected household will be made at different times of the day
and different days of the week. We are offering two sampling options, both of which are
standard in the telephone surveying business, but the second of which is superior at
reducing sampling bias. (See Attachment A for a description of these two methods.)
Statistical Analysis
PRR will analyze results of the surveys using appropriate statistical techniques that will validly
summarize the data (descriptive statistics), as well as indicate the strength and nature of
relationships between and among variables (bi-variate and multi-variate analysis). Tests of
statistical significance will be conducted so that the City of Medina will be able to have
confidence in the results as a tool for decision -making. In addition, logistical regression can
be used to determine the relative impact of specific citizen characteristics on their opinions
and future behaviors. Cluster analysis can be used to identify any relevant citizen segments
relative to community opinions.
Reporting and Presentation
PRR will write a final report in a clear and focused style so that results, conclusions and
recommendations are easily understood by a variety of audiences. As important as the
content of a report is, it is equally important to focus on how that information is presented.
PRR's information architecture and Edward Tufte trained approach ensures that research
results will be effectively delivered and understood.
City of Medina Public Opinion Survey PRR, Inc.
4
•
Timeline
r
N
M
`Ch
LO
W
ti
M
M
0
,-
Project scoping and survey topic identification
Develop surrey questions
Program phone survey into CATI and/or
design mail survey and/or program online
Pretest and revise survey
Field survey
Data management
Top -line results
7CI
Analyze data
I
Write draft report
Finalize report
Presentation
Cost Ontions
Option Combinations
Total Costs
Data Collection
Total Costs
(with least expensive
(per
Common Tasks
Options(per
option)
hone option)
combination
Identify data collection
approach & b is areas
$1 157
Online
$1 829
$13 752
Mail & online
$16 608
Develop survey uestion
$2,797
Mail
$2,856
$14,779
Online & telephone
$21,254
Data analysis, reporting
Telephone (10 minute,
& presentation
$5 597
standard sampling
$7 502
$19 425
Mail & telephone
$22 281
Telephone (10 minute,
Project mana ement
$2,372
advanced sampling
$8 302
$20,225
Online, mail & telephone
$24,110
Telephone (12 minute,
Common Task Total
$11,923
Istandard sampling
$8 477
$20,400
Telephone 12 minute,
advanced sampling
$9 278
$21 201
Additional option:
■ Online survey with automatic online data tabulation and customized online reports. - $8,155
Why Choose PRR?
• Full -service research and public involvement firm
• Decades of experience working with municipalities and city councils
• Extensive experience in the land use, transportation and community growth arenas
• Advanced quantitative and qualitative data analysis capabilities
• Extensive public opinion and public involvement activity
• Easy and fun to work with
• Always, always looking for ways to leverage client funds
Project Team
Bruce Brown, Ph.D. Director of Research, PRR
Katherine Schomer, M.A. - Research Associate, PRR
Alex Sobie, B.A., Lead Designer, PRR
Kelly Snyder, BA, Roth Hill
Andrew Rosenkranz, J.D. - Managing Director, Pacific Market Research
City of Medina Public Opinion Survey PRR, Inc.
5
•
Attachment A: Telephone Survey Sampling Options
Option 1: Regular random sampling using random digit dial phone lists
Prior to the start of each project we use the CFMC Survent software to set a maximum
number of attempts on each piece. of sample and to distribute attempts on different days of
the week and at different times of the day (""day -parts"'). We generally set the maximum
attempts to each household at 4 attempts and set the software so that follow up attempts to
reach a household will be spread through different day -parts and on different days of the
week. We only attempt viable numbers 4 times. For instance, if a telephone number is
disconnected, that number is considered "dead" and will not have 4 attempts.
Usually when making 4 attempts, we make sure that the attempts are spread as follows:
• 1 attempt: Monday -Friday, 5:00 pm - 7:00 pm
• 1 attempt: Monday -Friday, 7:00 pm - 9:00 pm
• 1 attempt: Saturday or Sunday, 10:00 am - 6:00 pm
• 1 attempt: Made on any day/time of the week after the 3 previous attempts have been
made.
Option 2: Random sampling for legal cases using random digit dial phone lists
This approach is identical to that described above except that we divide the sample into reps,
with each rep containing a specific number of telephone records. On any rep that is "worked"
(where we dial a telephone number within that rep) all the sample within that rep is
"exhausted". By exhausted we mean that every piece of sample is dead or has been dialed 4
times. In the initial week of data collection we try to determine the number of reps we will
need to work in order to reach our total quota of completes. Because we work a rep until all
the sample is exhausted, we may finish with slightly more completed surveys than our
original quota. For example, if we are attempting to get 900 completed surveys, and we have
reps of 200 telephone numbers which are yielding an average of 14.4 completes per rep, we
will need to work 63 reps in order to get the 900 completed surveys, and will end up with
approximately 907 completed surveys.
City of Medina Public Opinion Survey PRR, Inc.
ITEM J-3
•
•
•
CITY OF MEDINA
Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039
(425) 454-9222 www.ci.medina.wa.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 5, 2005
TO: City Council; City Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
RE: Update - Medina Beach Park Bulkhead Rehabilitation Project
I. Purpose — To update the City Council on the Medina Beach Park Bulkhead and
General Improvement Project, and to review the design concept and
costs.
II. Background —
A. The City Council reviewed project concept proposals for the Medina Beach
Park Bulkhead Rehabilitation presented by the former Public Works Director
in September of 2003. In that presentation the Director indicated that the
park waterfront rock bulkhead/revetment was failing, the former Dustin
Property concrete wall bulkhead was being undermined, the swimming area
suffers from algae and debris buildup during the summer, and that both
docks at the park are deteriorated and require repair.
B. In December 2003, the Council passed the City's 2004 budget that included
$ 250,000 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) funding for Phase I of the
Medina Beach Park Bulkhead Rehabilitation and General Improvement
Project .
C. In February of 2004, a consultant design team consisting of OTAK Inc.
(project management), Golder Associates (geotechnical), Art Anderson
Associates (waterfront design), and Shapiro Associates (shoreline
permitting) were tasked with the design of the proposed park improvements
and working with the various regulatory agencies to ensure permit approval.
D. During the April 12, 2004 City Council meeting, the former Director provided
an update to the Council on the status of the project which spelled out the
approvals and regulatory agency permits required for the project, provided
some dock design concepts, and included pictures of wave energy against
the waterfront bulkhead.
ITEM J-3
E. In August of 2004, the former Director's project update to Council indicated
that sub -surface lake borings were performed to facilitate the replacement
design for the docks, and at that time He proposed design modifications to
the waterfront bulkhead restoration. The modifications deviated from the
proposed reconstruction of the waterfront rock bulkhead to the placement of
gravel fill in front of the existing rock riprap bulkhead on an 8:1 slope to form
a gradual sloping shoreline with a top layer of "spawning gravel" that would
be beneficial to juvenile fish similar to the Corps of Engineers constructed
beach front at Lincoln Park in West Seattle (photos attached, note more
recent erosion of the beach near the old bulkhead in the second photo). The
cost for the project was revised to $ 540,000.
•
•
ITEM J-3
•
•
•
F. In December 2004, the Council passed the City's 2005 budget that included
$ 270,000 for Phase 11 of the project.
III. Project Design Concepts and Estimated Costs
A. The consultant team moved forward with these modified design changes to
produce regulatory agency permit drawings for submission to the various
agencies (see EXHIBIT 1). They estimate that their scope of work is now
approximately 60% complete and that they have expended 90% of their
original budget.
B. Estimated construction costs for the major project components by the
consultant team have also increased as follows:
DESCRIPTION 30% COST ESTIMATE
60% COST ESTIMATE
Dock Replacement
$ 170,200
$ 275,800
Bulkhead Removal
$ 20,000
$ 15,000
Upslope Rockery/Planting
$ 18,000
$ 18,000
Jetty Modification
$ 24,600
$ 24,600
Spawning Gravel Fill
$ 76,000
$ 79,800
Habitat Enhancement
$ 46,000
$ 46,000
Contingencies/Sales Tax
$188,000
$190,000
TOTAL =
$ 542,800
$ 649,200
1 0.
it-
/
P POS D
TR GN
SEC.2 S C\' � � a
EXIST. ' W 5
REVETMEk
CIDINA
TY HALL
\ \ �►�� 4... ,':r � �XI�f. PIE
PROPOSED PIER R: , ` C Son
C.
-WALL OPOSED
R` • , 0``
T B€ REMO '"• RETAINING WALL
SE .3 25_
APPROX. LIMIT OF ;�.�-. ■
PROPOSED SPAWNING GRAVEL
LEGEND
PROPOSED PAR
PROPOSED SPAWNING GRAVEL \ w
'. PROPOSED SHORELINE RESTORATION PUNTINGS
\ \SEC.
■ • • • ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK (18.6, SEE NOTE)
tu, PROAQSED GE
WOOQY DEB
\5E .4 \ \
EXIST. 0 K
PTO BE\REMOV,
BASIS OF ELEVATIONS \ �'
BASIS OF ELEVATIONS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE TOP OF BRASS TACK IN LEAD IN CONCRETE \ MONUMENT CASE AT THE CENTERUNE INTERSECTION OF 84TH AVENUE NE AND MIDLAND ROAD. ' ELEVATION - 89.39 FEET (NAVD 1988) PER CITY OF BELLEVUE VERTICAL. CONTROL NETWORK.
ORDINARY HIGH WATER (18.6) AND LOW WATER (16.1) MARKS WERE CONVERTED(-3.4) FROM '
21.0 AND 19.5 RESPECTNELY BASED ON CORPS DATA (LAKE WASHINGTON SUMMARY HYDROGRAPH 1979-1999).
9 4/2004
DateMedina Beach Park
Otak Inc.
Designed
Reference #
501 Evergreen Point Road
36 T25N R4E City of Medina, King County, WA 98039
Section Township Ronge
620 Kirkland Suits 100
Site Plan
,{�/
Kirkland. Wasbiftn;toa 98039� 1/ /
Phone: (425) 622-4448 �F f
0 50
SCALE IN FEET
30363
Project No,
File No.
Sheet No.
10
I *
I- J cv w (N.-
10
tV
M
CO
O
I'7
0
z
O
p
u
�O
L
a
Z
O
rn
rn
rn
rn
n
. rn
x
a
WQY��
w
OW 0 �
Z�
Z �2
0
C
r1r)
'
a -J '`�
z�o�ol
O
�i 00
O W
Z O cr- N
rn
,��{
U
a
Z Z p
C.)C9
ict:x
r
az
a:3
cn W 3
�Lj
(V C C
0 LL. M LLJ
aY Q U
QCL
o z 0 0o
Ct7 Q)�
W �
x jucr.
. i Z 00
w o �-
0
(' a
to
(n J
�U
cn
CO
Z 0 Z7,-
O W U
S rz
u
F- (n WSW
a
O a °) ¢ w
c
d' (Y01
€i
Q W (D
LLJ Q. °O
O a
� z b ,�
L.L- W �.
;
N o � .d
0 LLz n
N F-
tN cn Q a
Z O
Q O o
O) O
a
Ro
WQN
0N w� u
o° o V s
C�
•
•
O 00 c0 �t N O 00 co d N O
-
O
rn
rn
rn
rn
h
rn
'tea Y00
�O O�Q
U
HZ t
l Q -oj
Z � � .�
J� �QW[on
ZZ �(p
U IC LAJ C.) O
L) Z E W Z
NQLLJ
�3
Y W
m
W
�Go
Oo m
f? z 0 <
w F L ... N
x ,� (-)
f-
N W3o
a.-c000
W
OZ a) W
vl5^
_
F—W Z�.�'.i
V
� U vcd
Z
O
O Lj
FU-
�w
M
m3a
J
W
g Lo
� C�
Oci
LiII =rn
v.�oro
�
� Q cr ¢
f_O
Ono
M W O N
9
L-
11
0
T
U)
C
0Q
3
U
W
CC
c c
o
a_Y
O
U
v
L-
C
V)
a�i'
�v
-
>4--
. _
(f)
W O
4--
O
O�
L
u-)U
n
go
S1��
dw
cy-�
o
0
CN
C
Zf
0
LO;
NO
�w
N
d
07
rn
O
c
mv
RD
icn
3
u
0
0w
s
I 0
10
10
0
W UZ
O Z L j
O Q Q
w
CL(n0
oW
ow
0-0
cr
w
0
W
V)
iu` w
i*��siM
EN
� •
E�tlrrs�IlYii
�
•
was
�
y
•
CD
O
o
z
o
� z
m
o6.
Z
a
O
rn
cn
rn
r�
rn
x
Yoe
oo.L-W
0
Q
ooz�=
M
�
00
C-
O o:
� N
-+-►
zz wP
QzE2�_va
a W
c �'
�
• �
LA-0o
U
oO
oz
ycLLJ
1-6
WVCX CL
U)
NU)Q:QO
w
•�
>4—
WO
Q)
.. =
4--
U)
�3r 0
N
0
0
LLJ_
�Z SOW
�
Q ,'f''
L
cn:3 —oin
cn��m
F—WJ
ex C) od
O Lv �,
g
O
WF=
U-mw
LyJ'1 �
(
`-oMLO
UJ
-'i
2 !Qn
O V
CVCZi
a`,a-M
Z
�
W 11 _
�
�a
d
N
OOLLJ
mozd
Vi
tn� ¢z
ZO
cn 0-0
c
°v
c�Op
m W Q N
m
uM
O 0
0 N
8
10
10
10
O M cD t N O m c0 d' N O
n N N N N N
N
cp
O
0
z
r
U C
CL
0
'
N
rn
►�
O
U
00
CCS
>;
C
+J
�4
U
°°
CCf
w
O
c c
1
+U O
MMQ�
r
Cif
a '-v
N U?
�
•�
(D
>.�
to
�
a�
W o
o °
U
LOU
(f}
W
d-
ct
O
O U
a�
z t
c
C
!n
Nc
d
rn OQ
w� o
ITEM J-3
IV. Alternative Design Concept and Estimated Cost
A. The endangered species listing of the Pacific chinook salmon and bull trout
adversely impacted a number of projects. Regulatory agencies found
themselves in an overlapping and sometimes conflicting administrative roll,
lacking permit requirements and approval criteria for permit issuance. The
result was a long delay in the review and issuance of dock and other
waterfront structure permits. In early 2003, the Army Corps of Engineers
proposed a regional general permit (RGP) to allow the maintenance,
modification, and construction of residential overwater structures under an
abbreviated review process. The focus of the various agencies has been to
avoid adverse impact and to incorporate impact reduction measures that will
rehabilitate the natural processes, structure and functions of the lake shore.
B. During the permit review process, the avoidance of triggering a lengthy
review process has been the guiding focus of the consultants on this project
to date. However, the return of the lake shore at the park to a vegetated
natural shoreline runs counter to the use and enjoyment of the park shore
by the community. The solution lies somewhere between.
C. In that vane, I contacted a representative of Waterfront Construction, Inc.
which has been active in obtaining permits and completing a number of
dock and shoreline restoration projects in this region. I visited the site and
discussed the proposed Medina Beach Park project with two of the
company representatives, and listened to their approach to the project.
Using my premise that the shoreline of the park should contribute to the
enjoyment of the lake frontage by the public, they proposed the following:
a. Rebuild the rock groin at the south edge of the swimming area
incorporating pipes through the groin to promote water circulation.
b. Replace the crumbling irregular rock bulkhead with a new bulkhead
constructed of 3 to 4 man basalt angular rock backfilled with crushed
rock and a fine soil containment fabric and spawning gravel placed
from the toe of the bulkhead out ten feet (see EXHIBIT 2 and 3).
c. As the bulkhead is rebuilt, incorporate beach coves into the frontage
that will create alcoves in a semi -circle pattern that will allow the
majority of the cove to extend above the high water level of the lake.
Within the cove, flat stones would provide steps into the cove. The
bottom of the cove would be layered with different gravels with
smaller gravels changing to larger cobbles at the lake entrance
similar to the following photo.
•
ITEM J-3
u
d. The south former Dustin property concrete wall would be removed
and transformed into a larger gravel cove with an upper shoreward
rockery wall installed as a border for upland planting between the
rockery and the shore.
e. The two existing piers would be removed and two new piers would be
constructed using treated steel piling, treated beams and stringers,
and 50 % open area decking.
D. Estimated costs:
Description Estimated Construction Cost
Dock Removal $ 5,800
New Piers $ 152,000
Bulkhead & Jetty Modification $ 186,000
Contingencies/Sales Tax $120,000
TOTAL = $ 463,800
V. Recommendation:
Go forward with the alternative design concept and proceed to permit
application followed by preparation of bid documents, request for
construction bids, award, and construction.
•
0
TREE
:PEA GRAVEL/SAND MIXTURE. °
IN UPPER AREA :.
°
°:
o ° P
1 WASHED n :
W/ _SMALLER GRAVEL . D D"
° •D
p D" 30't a 0. o
oV"vo00UDo00, °°V 'ov ° D
° ° ° °� 0 000 0 000000000 000 00 00 00 0U0 0- 0 y
000000°00°°00°°00°°00°°00°00°000000000 O �.
°°000000 0°000°000°0000 000 000 0°°00°°0°°°0°° °°0 000°
0°000°0000 o00v000000°00000000°0000000000000000° 000°000000i,
70000000 00000000000000000000p0000 000000000°00 00°00O000C
0000 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 v
-'0 000 000 00 000 000 v00 000 00°00000000000° 00 00000
00 000
n_000 0vo 000 00° 00v°000000000000000000°0000 0p0000
_00�00000000Oo00000o0oao°o°0000000voop000000v000vov°. -
n ..n n0
/ TOP SOIL SPAWNING MIXTURE
(LARGE COBBLE)
E"
iHED ROCK TypIC/� L BEACH COVE
8' 4' 3' 2' 1' 0' 8'
SCALE: 1 /8"=1 '
CONCRETE STEPS
INTO COVE
IED ROCK
FILTER FABRIC
TYPICAL BATTERED ROCK BULKHEAD
4' 3' 2' 10'
i
SCALE: 1 /4"=1'
PICNIC TABLES
PROPOSED:
IN: LAKE WASHINGTON
T: Medina, Wa REVISED:
PLICANT: Medina Beach
Medina Beach
SHEET:2 OF:2
DATE: 3-16-05 DWG : 00-0000—A1-1
2005
C',ity Council Calendar
•
•
Description
January 10,
2005 Regular
Meeting
January 24,
2005 Study
Session
February 14,
2005 Regular
Meeting
February 28,
2005 Study
Session
2005 Study Sessions
Resolution
Adopted
2005 Leg Action Plan
Moved to 2/14
Approved
50 Anniversary
Planning
Completed
Annual Retreat Date
Completed
ARCH Budget
Approved
Citizen Survey
Moved to 2/14
Moved to 2/28
Moved to 3/14
City Facilities
Comprehensive Plan
Update
Moved to 2/28
Moved to 3/14
consent
FY 2003 Year End
Financial Report
Completed
Labor Negotiation
Strategies/Health Ins.
Moved to 3/14
Medina Park Off -leash
Rules
Completed
Public Relations Policy
Completed
PW & Bldg Code
Enforcement Contract
Services
Moved to 3/14
Side and Setbacks
No Action
Site Plan Review
Moved to 4/11
for public
hearing
Special Event
Policy/CityPolicy/City Involvement
Tree Replacement —
84t" Avenue N.E.
04/06/2005
Page 1 of 4
P:\2005 Agenda Packets\04112005\Item J-4, Council Agenda Calendar.doc
•
•
•
2005
City Council Calendar
March 14, 2005
Regular
Meeting
March 28,
2005 Study
Session
April 11, 2005
Regular
Meeting
April 25, 2005
Study Session
2006 Labor Agreements
Move to 4/11
501hAnniversary
Planning
Moved to 4/11
Action
Administrative
Variances
Discussion
Citizen Survey
Completed
Discussion/Action
Discussion
Comprehensive Plan
Update
Adopted
Critical Areas Ord.
Adopted
Financial Report — Is'
Quarter
Moved to May
9th
K-9 Unit Gift
Acceptance
Authorized
Action
Loop Driveway Access
Policy
Discussion
Medina Beach Park
Project
Discussion
Newsletter Policy
Moved to May
23rd
PW/Code Enf Services
Interlocal Agreement
No Action Taken
Site Plan Review
Public Hearin
Special Event
Policy/CityPolicy/City Involvement
Moved to May
23rd
Tree Replacement —
841h Ave NE
Moved to May
23rd
04/06/2005
Page 2 of 4
P:\2005 Agenda Packets\04112005\Item J-4, Council Agenda Calendar.doc
•
•
•
2005
City Council Calendar
Description
May 9, 2005
Regular
Meeting
May 23, 2005
Study Session
June 13, 2005
Regular
Meeting
June 27, 2005
Study Session
2006 Labor Agreements
Discussion
Administrative
Variances
Discussion/Action
CIP/TIP — 2006 — 2011
Discussion
Citizen Survey
Discussion
Discussion
Financial Report 1 S
Quarter
Discussion
Newsletter Policy
Discussion
Discussion/Action
Regional
Communications
Project
Discussion
Special Event Policy
Discussion
Discussion/Action
Tree Replacement —
84t" Avenue NE
Discussion
04/06/2005
Page 3 of 4
PA2005 Agenda Packets10411200511tem J-4, Council Agenda Calendar.doc
2005
Citv Council Calendar
•
•
•
Description
July 11, 2005
Regular Meeting
July 25, 2005
Study Session
August 8, 2005
Regular Meeting
August 22,
2005 Study
Session
2006 Budget
Discussion
2006 Labor Agreements
Discussion
Citizen Survey
Discussion
Financial Report — Mid
Year
Discussion
Medina Park Off -leash
Rules Revisit
Discussion
04/06/2005
Page 4 of 4
P:\2005 Agenda Packets\04112005\Item J-4, Council Agenda Calendar.doc
To: Medina City Council April 11, 2005
Re: Store Mitigation Level I versus Level 2
The new Medina store is the most controversial construction project in Medina.
As such, the council and the administration should take extra steps to ensure all permit
criteria are met. I believe the store meets the criteria for a Level 2 mitigation plan, not a
Level 1, as submitted. The store meets the criteria for a Level 2 because:
1) at 7,489 sq. ft. it is over the 5,000 sq. foot threshold
2) it is over 1,200 cubic yards of fill and/or excavation
otal excavation is 1,710 cubic yards with at least 542 cubic yards of fill for a TOTAL
\4ITIGATION OF 2,252 cubic yards.
CALCULATION OF EXCAVATION VOLUMES
1) Volume within foundation walls
29" X 35" = 1,015 sq. ft.
44" X 40' = 1,760 sq. ft.
16' X 5" = 80 sq. ft.
5'X 5'X Y2' = 12.5 sg. ft.
TOTAL 2,867.5 sq. ft.
2,867.5 sq. ft. X 11 feet (depth of excavation) 27 cu. ft. per cu. yard
= 1,168 cu. yards
2) Volume around foundation required to set forms
North -South
2 ends X 46 LF X 3' wide X I V deep + 27 cu. ft. per cu. yard = 112 cu. yards
East-West
2 sides X 84 LF X 3' wide X I F deep + 27 cu. ft. per cu. yards = 205 cu. yards
TOTAL 317 cubic yards
3) Volume required to slope I I' deep excavation at 45 degree angle for safety
Y2X 2 ends X 46 LFs X 4.25' wide X I I' deep + 27 cu. ft. per cu. yard
79.6 cu. yards
Y2X 2 ends X 84 LFs X 4.25' wide X 11' deep + 27 cu. ft. per cu. yard
145.4
TOTAL 225 cu. yards
Thank
Paul S
ink
T.
v
.+o -�► +
1!S
1 � �
LL
�c
.z
Q
CL c72
,U
02
0
LU
LLJ
co .3
r lap
Itz
�
�tj
u
�Q
jo: Medina City 11, 2005y Council p
e: Store Permit non Compliance with Ordinance 302
I believe the submitted plans for the store do not follow Ordinance 302 for the following
reasons and inconsistencies:
1) Section 4 (A) " authorizing construction of a minor new commercial use under
4,000 square feet in size."
FACT: The proposal has over 7,489 square feet.
2) Section 4 (D) USES
1) "Use of the basement shall be restricted to mechanical equipment, bookkeeping,
and storage that supports the market."
2) "Use of the second floor shall be limited to bookkeeping and storage in support
I
of the market use as well as storage space leased to a single outside party."
1 ACT: Current area of the market is 1,700 sq. ft. There is an additional 4,472 sq. ft. of
mechanical, bookkeeping, and storage space. 4,472 sq. ft. to support 1,700 sq. ft. is
certainly NOT RESTRICTED OR LIMITED as specified in the ordinance.
3) Section 4 (F) 3,B) "Height modulation shall be required on the South facade at or
before a distance of 58'
i
a) The exterior is to replicate the scale of the existing building.
c) The height of the proposal building will be stepped down at the point on
the south facade described above similar to the existing south facade.
d) A shed roof shall be provided on the east end.
ACT:
• REPLICATE The existing store roof steps down in two places and the roof
terminates at 58 feet. The proposed plan has only one step down in the roof and the
roof is 78 feet long.
• STEP DOWN - The ordinance clearly states the roof will step down similar to the
existing south facade. The existing south facade steps down approximately 3 feet.
The proposed plan does not step down 3 feet.
• SHED ROOF The proposed new store shows a hip roof on the east end, not a
shed roof.
CONCLUSION: I believe the second floor should be limited to the area above the store.
There is more area then required to support the store and this area is not justified per the
ordinance. The roof should replicate the existing building, which will limit the area of the
second floor.
Sincerely,
C
d
Paul Saa
Lucius H. Biglow, Jr.
2425 Evergreen Point Road
Medina, WA 98039-1531
April 11, 2005
To: Medina City Council
Re The Tainted Suvey:
Please let me tell you my side of the tainted survey story.
1. April 28, 2004. Memo from Park Board re dogs in Medina Park
("the Memo");
2. May 2004. Shel gave me a copy of the Beckwith Report, which
included a comprehensive Medina Park Bond survey.
3. July 12, 2004 Council passed Ordinance #774 ("774") and
committed to evaluate it in 9 to 12 months. This is not set forth
in 774, but is confirmed by the record of the meeting and by
Doug's Memo dated December 21, 2004 to the Council.
4. At its January 2005 meeting, the Council discussed the
recommendation in Doug's Memo that it establish criteria for
evaluating 774 and decided to survey Medina residents. I was
present and assumed that the survey would be similar to the one
in the Beckwith Report.
5. The Council then invited Hebert to tell them about the process
of conducting the survey. I was not present, but later inquired
and learned about Hebert. Seeing no problem, I went to see
Susan Bond. We discussed the propriety of my visit, thought it
not out of order; but agreed that Mary and Doug should be
advised.
6. Susan accepted from me copies of the Memo and the Beckwith
Report; I summarized 774 and said I believed that encouraging
compliance was a better solution. I think I gave her an oral
summary of Doug's Memo requesting criteria. Perhaps a copy
of the Memo itself.
7. She asked me what I wanted to accomplish and I told her that I
wanted to have Medina Park saved for the maximum
en j oyment of all users..
8. That's all. If that be tainting, so be it.
Respectfully,
1118
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 781, dated December 13,
2004, the 2005 BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The following amendments are made to the 2005 Budget for the City of
Medina.
FUND
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
General Fund
$45,000.00
Increased Wages/Salaries
and Benefits Additional for
Police Officer position.
$28,720.00
Supplies, training, equipment
and misc. costs for Police
Canine Unit.
Equipment Replacement
$30,000.00
Replacement of Police
Vehicle.
Total Budget Amendment
$103,720.00
SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to make any transfers necessary to carry out
the terms of this ordinance.
SECTION 3. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect five (5) days after its
publication or the publication of a summary of its intent and contents.
PASSED BY AT LEAST ONE MORE THAN A MAJORITY OF THE CITY
COUNCIL ON THIS I Ith DAY OF APRIL, 2005, AND SIGNED IN AUTHENTICATION
OF ITS PASSAGE THE 11 th DAY OF APRIL 2005.
Mary Odermat, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Wayne D. Tanaka, City Attorney
Attest:
Randy Reed, CMC, City Clerk
ORD. 777 - 1 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Medina, Washington
On APRIL I I, 2005, the City Council of the City of Medina, Washington, adopted
Ordinance No. , the main points of which are summarized by its title as follows:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 7819 2005 BUDGET FOR
THE CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON.
The full text of this ordinance will be mailed upon request.
APPROVED by the City Council at their meeting of APRIL 11, 2005.
ORD. 777
Randy Reed, CMC, City Clerk
2
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 781, dated December 13,
2004, the 2005 BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The following amendments are made to the 2005 Budget for the City of
Medina.
FUND
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
General Fund
$25,000.00
Increased Professional
Services for 5& Anniversary
Event Planning/Celebration
Total Budget Amendment
$25,000.00
SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to make any transfers necessary to carry out
the terms of this ordinance.
SECTION 3. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect five (5) days after its
publication or the publication of a summary of its intent and contents.
PASSED BY AT LEAST ONE MORE THAN A MAJORITY OF THE CITY
COUNCIL ON THIS 1 I' DAY OF APRIL, 2005, AND SIGNED IN AUTHENTICATION
OF ITS PASSAGE THE I I th DAY OF APRIL 2005.
Approved as to form:
Wayne D. Tanaka, City Attorney
Mary Odermat, Mayor
Attest:
Randy Reed, CMC, City Clerk
ORD. 777
-i-
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Medina, Washington
On APRIL 11, 2005, the City Council of the City of Medina, Washington, adopted
Ordinance No. , the main points of which are summarized by its title as follows:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 7819 2005 BUDGET FOR
THE CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON.
The full text of this ordinance will be mailed upon request.
APPROVED by the City Council at their meeting of APRIL 11, 2005.
Randy Reed, CMC, City Clerk
ORD. 777 2
19
9 a
0
ry
�c-
AXE AS 11NGT0N/CEDAR/SAM`MAMISH
As 1 j
GS
November 12, 2004
.Bellevue Dear Local Government Partner:
Bothell
WATERSHED (WRIA 8) STEERING COMMITTEE
ti'7111;
The Lake
Washington/
Cedar/
Sammamish
Watershed
Thanks for your participation to date in developing the attached WRIA 8 Chinook Salmon Conservation
Plan: Public Review Dr -aft. On behalf of the Steering Committee for the Lake Washington/Cedar/
Sammamish (WRIA 8) Watershed, we are looking for your comments so that we can recommend a plan
that local governments will be ready to implement.
After the public review process ends on December 17111, the Steering Committee will incorporate all the
feedback we receive. Then we will present a plan to the WRIA 8 Forum of local elected leaders who
represent the 27 jurisdictions that have funded this planning effort. In turn, the WRIA 8 Forum will
present the plan to local governments to review and hopefully ratify so that we may proceed with
protecting and restoring habitat for our local runs of king Chinook salmon.
We will be asking local governments to take leadership on this challenge and consider making commit-
ments to continuing intergovernmental collaboration, implementing particular actions, and monitoring
progress. You may want to refer to the road map at the start of the plan to determine which issues arc of
most concern to your government. We look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
a_v�_
Cou ilmember Jim Compton
City of Seattle
WRIA 8 Steering Committee Co -Chair
Dear Shared Strategy for the Puget Sound:
ouncilmember Larry Phillips
King County
WRIA 8 Steering Committee Co -Chair
On behalf of the Steering Committee for the Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish (WRIA 8) Water-
shed, we look forward to working with you to roll our Chinook: Salmon Conservation Plan up into a
Puget Sound -wide recovery plan. Local governments and other partners are reviewing the draft plan
and will determine what commitments they are ready to make to protect and restore salmon habitat in
our watershed. In exchange, we are proposing some expectations and requests for benefits, assurances,
and funding from the federal regulating agencies and the state. We encourage you to review the entire
draft plan, and in particular, we would like to hear your thoughts on the requests we have laid out to
start these discussions. We look forward to talking with you to detennine how we can best work
together to benefit Chinook salmon and our citizens.
Sincerely,
C4—
Co& ilmember Jim Compton C ouncilmember Larry Phillips
City of Seattle King County
WRIA 8 Steering Committee Co -Chair WRIA 8 Steering Commmittee Co -Chair
Financial support provided by the signers of the interlocal agreement to cost -share watershed planning in WRIA 8:
Beaux Arts Village, Bellevue, Bothell, Clyde Hill, Edmonds, Hunts Point, Issaquah, Kenmore, Kent, Ong County, Kirkland, Lake Forest Park,
Maple Valley, Medina, Mercer Island, Mill Creek, Mountlake Terrace, Mukilteo, Newcastle, Redmond, Renton, Sammamish, Seattle,
Shoreline, Snohomish County, Woodinville and Yarrow Point