The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-13-2006 - Agenda PacketMEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA November 13, 2006 501 Everareen Point Road A. 7:00 p.m. Medina, WA 7:00 p.m. B. ROLL CALL (Adam, Biglow, Blazey, Lawrence, Phelps, Rudolph, Vall-Spinosa) C. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA D. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS E. ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Mayor 2. Council 3. Staff F. CONVENT AGENDA 1. Minutes from October 9, 2006 Council Meeting 2. Minutes from October 18, 2006 Special Meeting 3. Approval of October 2006 Checks/Finance Officer's Report G. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION 1. Non -Agenda Items (3 minutes per person) H. REPORTS 1. Police Department 2. Development Services 3. Public Works Department 4. Emergency Services Committee 5. Park Board 6. Planning Commission 7. City Manager Meeting Agenda is subject to change prior to approval of the agenda during the meeting. Persons interested in a specific agenda item may wish to call the City Clerk at (425) 233-6400 before 4:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting to confirm agenda items. I. PUBLIC HEARING 1. 2007 Budget and Property Tax Levy J. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Ordinance Setting Property Tax Levy for 2007 2. 2007 — 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 3. Authorize Agreement with Waldon & Company for City Manager Search 4. Medina Store Historical Use Permit Application 5. Council Agenda Calendar K. NEW BUSINESS L. EXECUTIVE SESSION 1. Discussion of labor negotiations 6:00 p.m. M. ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The Medina City Council encourages public participation and values input from citizens. In an effort to conduct meetings in a fair, but efficient manner, the City Council will follow previously adopted procedures, which are available in the City Clerk's Office. All comments shall be addressed to the Council as a whole in a courteous and respectful manner. Citizens wishing to address the Council should complete a speaker card and submit it to the recording secretary prior to the start of the meeting. Speaker cards are on the podium prior to the start of the City Council meetings. `l0 -na 0CL S W, 0 wi O 3 3 CD CD o' a. X CD CD a O 0 a c' CD cn w CD D CD cn =. cc a cn: c cnCD - %< CD :E cn cn ? N -0 O. n a O A-M CD' cn n O 3 3 C C0 Cc O F. Icc ON � . -" O o c< CD CD O 0 3 3 C O Q O CD 0 0 Oa OD CS CD in 0 a �. CD C) Q r-f- 0 C O D s= cc c cn O n O O' CD II' n CD CD E CD CD 3 CD co a Cn CD CD 3 CD N CD 53 �. CD cQ -, -00 O d' 3 ;* CCDD = CD CL O 3 �. CD 3 CAD Q, cn 0 cn <' CD O cn C '♦ cr CD' c cQ O CD 0 O Q. O 0 a■ Volk A CD m 0 0 �a rook U) -�=� � mat`•. ��:� . !D c � CL -0 r'. CD rMO ., o tD o. X � n < o -� cD o. U n m -� n rRO.. cD- -� rqL mn CL so to %10 (D Cii ` Q Q-< CDC7 CD O -+,r Q < � CD 3 cD CD CD CD n � W T Q C: CD QCD 3 �. 0 CD CD M M. Cn Q r-f- Q �. Q 0 w 3� _ CD Q• CD CD -� vn 3 w CD Lv O e e—f CD �- CD CD W Q CD Q -� c — 0 m CD D. o CD cn r--. 9 c \I� CD V) Q CD V) r R w 0 C 0 U) LO ----------- ------- ............ - - - -------- ---------------- ............... -------------- -- -------- T-" Or P I Cf) CD > CD ��r CD( O O r+ ZE (D 0 w --------------------------------------------- --- 10 - I ..... ............ 0 0 C13 --------------- ---------------------- ...... ----- ------------------------ ----------- ------ ------------ ............................ CD CD (D (D rm ro 0 0 on Ct3 ='• m (D 9) Cn 0 C . --iDm -noozC)CD Q) c = = c F), 0 m CD < a `< _o `� C7 0 --, ° � 0 cD 3 � CD M ace-. � - o m a c� �. o = �- `� O :3 -o O =3 �' o a CD G cv m to M.CD -� (n = Q. C n CD cn C c ■ 0 o� 0 n En Q CD 1 CD W N ' O 0) � tD CD Co 119 CCD �. 0 r^•f O tQ = CD ML O Co O Q� V ■ %10 J 00 0 -► SCI)L 3 A CD I !D N 0 1 -p T CD 'V �. 3 X �. CD oa CD CD CD a < o ma:Z! 0'9 o Xm �' 0 003::c�Di0 M. CD CD CO 0 0 0 CD 0 3<OC3� 3 o c CA 3 ar rno�`°<ot aojo _ o 0 0 0 CD m 3 1 o 3 m' CD 3 tQ ai 3 0 fD c CD _ CD a CD �' o , m c �.°< G)00 0 3 � 6a3� a° oco =3 v A Q- o < °BCD .CD �CL Cl) U) �C ITI c � , in U j : 0 cn Z. 3 U) PE40 a C: P-1. = a , Mg CL 2 CD Ci C.L ' , CD .� (D 0 0 � rn M Met sm MRSCD -M" .(A 9 0 CD -, U ,gyp 0 CL :r 0 (D 0 M 0 :3 0 :3. sin .0-1. 'L� Q • smile 0 0 CD' M o tlu - Q C Eli, .W M 0 cn tl :� cc 0 M G 'g.CD � slims= -I < ._. .�. � CSC) �� ,. 3 0 oq 00 CL • CD CD CD C — Elf — R M cn 0 = cn C o -,� to • cn G`L t•y CD o� =0 CD M ..< a 0 Zol ■ r+ M C 8. s R � 3 ED CL m 0* SP cn= 0� 02. O wo n� M 0 X m' c rA r o m 03 � y m 3 0 M U) 3 m 0 C� u 0 m 0 .a ■ x CD Si) .7:� 0 ;u a N CD 3rn 2 0 3 — 0 cn 0-11 .1�• �.+� ICJ -j G) M 91) 55,C) 0 ;u CD m m? 0. 0 0) m DTI Q.), 04 lu 8 R = o Q. CL CL t6ch 4 CLM M� M 0 (o 876 4CL-� 7S 7 N N ch . 0� 'Q 40 m Q (A M M CD (A w rq. 0 --j ..1 CL 0� c CL YYYP Y - a CL CL toCL ..,.,, ul M Ep0 (D o 0 �r k 3 9 • °` 0 � t3. F .� CD M 0 Cn 0 3 CD (n 0 CD �< o y Co . tl M CD IV V cc CD ■ 1 �1 CD x 0 3 ti 0 11O 0 iw. m 0 0 � . m m wpm 0 m N bJ p. CT y w (D I-- 4 5! -� .s l i • , R a ti• R � t i R R I+ � R i w rj2O SR 520 Bridge Replacement and NOY Protect Preliminary Comment Summary on the SR 520 Draft EIS Presented to SR 520 Executive Committee Tuesday, October 24, 2006 (Comments received through 10/18/06) Introduction The SR 520 Project published its Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on August 18, 2006, marking the start of the 45-day comment period. On September 21, 2006, the comment period was extended to October 31, 2006, for a total of 74 days to comment. Below is an interim comment summary to indicate preliminary trends in the public comments received to date. To ensure that the public had access to the document prior to the start of the comment period, the document was distributed during August 9 —11, and ads were run in local papers on August 11 to announce the availability of the document. The Executive Summaries and CD sets are provided free to the public, while the full Draft EIS document costs $40.00. To date, over 800 Draft EIS full documents, executive summaries, and CDs have been distributed to agencies, organizations, libraries, and individuals. In addition, the Project has provided free Executive Summaries and CDs at a number of fairs, community events, and community organization briefings. Number of Comments Source of Comments for SR 520 DEIS Comments have been reviewed through October 18, 2006. Based on preliminary review of the comments through this date, 657 individuals, businesses, community groups, and public agencies have provided 734 comments in the form of letters, emails' ' written comment forms ecomment eComments, and oral comments. 50% Of the 734 total comments received to date, 365 were submitted via the Finall letter 12% project's online comment system. In Public Hearing addition, the Project has received 88 (MOHAI) Public Hearing 14% letters at the project office and 148 (st. Luke's) emails. The Project has conducted 4% two public hearings, at the Museum of History & Industry (MOHAI) in Seattle on September 18, and at St. Luke's Lutheran Church in Bellevue on September 21. MOHAI 10124106 Page 1 of 6 University Village Merchants Association University Park Community Club Wetherill Nature Preserve * These comments were forwarded to WSDOT from another agency or jurisdiction. Of the 72 comments from organizations, 40 were from an international campaign to preserve the Washington Park Arboretum. These letters and emails were submitted from gardens and arboretums around the world, expressing concern for effects on wetlands and the nature preserve, significant tree collections, and impacts to Arboretum users. All of these groups recommend that an independent study of alternative construction modes, such as a tube -tunnel, be commissioned. Zip Codes Represented Of the 734 comments submitted, the majority (422 comments) have come from City of Seattle zip codes. Of the 422 Seattle area comments, 209 are from zip code 98112, which includes the Montlake, Madison Park, and Capitol Hill communities; 58 represent zip code 98105, which includes the Laurelhurst and University neighborhoods, and 44 represent 98102, which includes the Eastlake, South Lake Union, Broadmoor, and Capitol Hill communities. Outside Project Area - 10% East Pi Area - Comment Distribution by Zip Code City of Seattle - 57% The project has received 100 comments from zip codes representing cities east of Lake Washington and along the project corridor. This includes Bellevue, Clyde Hill, Hunts Point, Kirkland, Medina, Redmond, and Yarrow Point. The project has also received 73 comments from various locations outside of the project corridor. These include comments of residents from cities within the State of Washington, as well as comments from multiple states across the country, two from Canada, and one from the Netherlands. As discussed above, 40 of these out -of -corridor comments are in reference to the Arboretum. 10124106 Page 3 of 6 • Urban Design and Aesthetics: Comments on this topic ranged widely, from support for the addition of lids for certain alternatives, to concern for the visual design of aspects of the project alternatives. Some of the "Other Categories" discussed: • 143 comments on neighborhoods and communities, usually regarding the construction or long-term project effects on certain neighborhoods, or the integrity /character of a neighborhood • 122 comments regarding noise, including sound walls, quieter pavement, increased traffic noise, and construction noise • 127 comments on bicycle and pedestrian access • 113 comments on funding and tolling • Environmental concerns: 80 comments on wetlands, 72 comments on fish and wildlife, 59 comments on ecosystems, 26 comments on air quality • 87 comments regarding agency coordination and public involvement, which include coordination with Sound Transit, University of Washington, and all agencies, as well as general comments regarding DEIS and/or comment process • 63 comments favor the Tube/Tunnel option, usually suggesting further research be conducted on this option. Alternative Preferences Identified Comments by Alternative (through 10/18/06) ® 6-Lane with Pack Street Interchange Favorable, 349 ■ 6-Lane with Second Montlake Bridge ■ 6-Lane with Pacific Favorable, 5 Street Interchange l / Unfavorable, 86 ® 6-Lane with Second Montlake Bridge Unfavorable, 22 ■ 8-Lane Alternative Favorable, 16 ■ 8-Lane Aftemative Unfavorable, 3 ® Tuberrunnel Favorable, 63 _■ Tubefrunnel Unfavorable, 4 �■4-Lane Alternative Favorable, 25 • 4-Lane Alternative Unfavorable, 50 \_O6-Lane Alternative ■ 6-Lane Aftemative Favorable, 50 Unfavorable, 78 10124106 Page 5 of 6 ITEM F-1 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES October 9, 2006 7:00 pm EXECUTIVE SESSION DRAFT Medina City Hall 501 Evergreen Point Road The council convened into executive session for the purpose of discussing labor negotiations, per RCW 42.30.110 (1)(g) for an estimated time of one and one-half hours and action was not anticipated. City Councilmembers Adam, Biglow, Blazey, Lawrence, Phelps, Rudolph and Vall-Spinosa; City Labor Attorney Scott Snyder, and City Manager Doug Schulze were present. Executive session adjourned at 7:00 pm and no action was taken. CALL TO ORDER Miles Adam called the October 9, 2006, Medina City Council Regular Meeting to order at 7:05 pm. ROLL CALL Present: Miles Adam, Lucius Biglow, Drew Blazey, James Lawrence, Katie Phelps, Robert Rudolph and Pete Vail-Spinosa City Staff Present: Doug Schulze, City Manager; Wayne Tanaka, City Attorney, Ogden Murphy Wallace; Jeff Chen, Chief of Police; Joseph Gellings, Director of Development Services; Bob Rohrbach, Building Official; Joe Willis, Director of Public Works; and Rachel Baker, City Clerk MEETING AGENDA Lawrence requested time for a brief discussion of automated voting. Vall-Spinosa requested time to discuss an amendment to ordinance 17.56.052 pertaining to traffic mitigation. Mayor approved adding new business items to meeting agenda. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS Adam awarded Schulze a plaque on behalf of the city council and thanked Schulze for his ten years of service and leadership to the city of Medina. Mayor introduced Dave Hedequist of the Emergency Management Committee and thanked him for his efforts leading the program which provided training to Medina citizens as community emergency response team members. Mr. Hedequist defined the DRAFT program and thanked the council for the opportunity to offer classes in the city. Certificates were awarded to participants Audree Harris, Marita Acheson, Pete Bryant, Dick Davis, Linda Hyatt, Dave Latimer, Dollie Latimer, Carl Lombardi, Michael Milliette, Brad Nelson, Marilyn Nelson, Bruce Swenson (Hunts Point), Dave Simpson (Clyde Hill), Don Skillman. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor (7: 07 pm) Adam thanked staff on behalf of the city council for their quick and professional response to the unfortunate accident which recently occurred in Medina. Adam announced the council would recess into executive session following the meeting agenda for an attorney/client discussion. CONSENT AGENDA Council recommended a modification to resolution pertaining to the property owner's right and opportunity to choose between a partial versus full property buyout. Amendment agreed to by council consensus. MOTION BIGLOW AND SECOND BLAZEY TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS: • September 11, 2006 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes • September 25, 2006 City Council Study Session Minutes • September 2006 Check/Finance Officers Report • Resolution Recommending City Council Preferred Alternative and Options for SR-520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project, as amended MOTION PASSED 7-0 AT 7:26 PM. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Mayor opened the floor to audience participation for non -agenda items Citizen Pat Boyd commended Chief Chen and his staff for their quick and professional response to the tragic accident which occurred to a child in his neighborhood recently. He expressed his belief that the department's response saved the child's life and he encouraged city leaders to consider the safety of all children in the community when decisions are made. REPORTS Police Department (7:28 pm) Chief Chen summarized monthly report. Phelps extended congratulations to the department's successful lifeguard program. City Council Minutes October 9, 2006 Page 2 DRAFT Chief reported new recruit Michael Girias has six weeks remaining in the academy until graduation and anticipated officer Lewis will return from maternity leave in the beginning of the year. He stated Matthew King, a former Army medic and two time Purple Heart winner, has recently joined the department and is currently in the academy. Chen conveyed officer Ramirez who was on inactive ready reserve status with the US Army has been ordered to report for active duty effective November 5, 2006. Chief said he and Joe Willis have been working together to address residents' concerns and were able to reach positive solutions regarding traffic congestion, speed and other issues not necessarily directly related with the recent accident and commended him for his efforts. Lawrence requested the spelling of Allison Adamonis's name be correctly reflected for the record in the lifeguard report. There was council consensus to discuss officer salary as presented in memorandum by the Chief dated October 1, 2006, under new business. Development Services (7:35 pm) No questions were presented to Gellings regarding monthly report. Public Works Department (7:36 pm) Willis summarized report and provided statuses of department projects. City Manager (7:40 pm) Schulze summarized information in report and answered council inquiries pertaining to levies on the November ballot. Phelps requested council consider purchasing a tile for the community bench in Medina Park. Council majority agreed to consider item under new business. OTHER BUSINESS International Building Code (IBC) & International Residential Code (IRC) Use (7:51 pm) Rohrbach referred to his memorandum addressed to the council dated October 3, 2006, and answered council inquiries pertaining to fire sprinkler requirements and the city's water flow issues. Council discussion followed. Rohrbach conveyed he will obtain fire flow statistics from the Bellevue Fire Department and provide to council. MOTION VALL-SPINOSA AND SECOND BIGLOW TO DEFER DECISION ON IBCARC USE UNTIL FIRE FLOW FIGURES PROVIDED TO COUNCIL. MOTION PASSED 7-0 AT 8:16 PM. City Council Minutes October 9, 2006 Page 3 DRAFT Non -Conforming Envelopes (8:16 pm) Gellings provided an overview of item and answered council inquiries regarding issue. Council discussed discretionary versus prescriptive approaches. Planning commission member Bret Jordan was present. Mayor opened floor to audience participation at 8:32 pm. Resident Brian Bolin explained remodeling restrictions imposed on his property because of his substandard lot and requested council consider an exception process that would enable property owners to undergo expansions which would preserve community character and also be minimally invasive to neighborhood. Resident Fred Hillman conveyed long-time residents in older homes that were built prior to incorporation would benefit from an approach that would allow small modifications to existing structures. Resident Pat Boyd said he owns a non -conforming home on a substandard lot and he and others in the similar situation bear the brunt of restrictive codes and agreed with Mr. Bolin's comments to preserve existing structures which would also provide relief to property owners. Resident Wilma Edmonds spoke of new speculative construction in her neighborhood and expressed how discretion must be utilized when extending exceptions to new versus long-time property owners and remodels versus new construction. Council discussion produced preference for a discretionary prescriptive approach with an administrative decision following a public noticing period. Council directed staff to narrow ordinance language and bring back to council before the end of the year. Mayor announced council would recess for a break at 9:11 pm and called the meeting back into session at 9:21 pm. 2007 Preliminary Budget (9:22 pm) Schulze provided an overview of budget documents and answered council inquiries. Mayor opened floor to public comment at 9:53 pm. Wilma Edmonds questioned Willis about funds proposed for paving at Fairweather Preserve. Floor closed to public comment. Council posed questions to Schulze regarding budget documents. MOTION PHELPS AND SECOND ADAM TO EXTEND MEETING TO 11:00 PM. MOTION PASSED 7-0 AT 10:06 PM. City Council Minutes October 9, 2006 Page 4 DRAFT Chief Chen answered council inquiries pertaining to police vehicles and department staffing. Council requested figures for salary and benefit costs for 2006 and 2007 salary and benefit cost increases. MOTION RUDOLPH AND SECOND LAWRENCE TO EXTEND MEETING FIFTEEN MINUTES. MOTION PASSED 6-1 (ADAM OPPOSED) AT 11:08 PM. City Manager Search Process (11:09 pm) MOTION LAWRENCE AND SECOND RUDOLPH TO AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH EITHER WALDRON & CO OR PROTHMAN AND FOR THE FIRM'S SELECTION OF TWO OR THREE CANDIDATES FOR INTERVIEWS BY CITY COUNCIL NEXT WEEK FOR THE POSITION OF INTERIM CITY MANAGER. MOTION PASSED 7-0 AT 11:20 PM. MEETING EXTENDED TEN MINUTES BY COUNCIL CONSENSUS AT 11:21 PM. Council Agenda Calendar (11:21 pm) Agenda calendar briefly discussed. NEW BUSINESS Signature Bench in Medina Park (11:23 pm) MOTION PHELPS AND SECOND LAWRENCE FOR COUNCIL TO SPEND $120 ON TILE FOR SIGNATURE BENCH IN MEDINA PARK. MOTION PASSED 6-1 (BLAZEY OPPOSED) AT 11:24 PM. Officer Pay on Military Duty (11:24 pm) MOTION AND SECOND TO SUPPLEMENT THE PAY FOR OFFICER RAMIREZ FOR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TOTAL MILITARY SALARY AND CURRENT MEDINA SALARY FOR A PERIOD OF 90-DAYS AND TO REVIEW TOTAL COMPENSATION ON A MONTHLY BASIS. MOTION PASSED 7-0 AT 11:30 PM. Automatic Voting System (11:30 pm) Lawrence recommended council consider incorporating an automatic voting system into new dais design. Traffic Mitigation Ordinance Revision (11:32 pm) Vall-Spinosa recommended a code change to enable the council to impose mitigation requirements on large redevelopment projects such as schools and churches. He City Council Minutes October 9, 2006 Page 5 DRAFT suggested new language in ordinance reference pedestrian and vehicular traffic impacts on adjacent streets and sidewalks. Tanaka conveyed staff could draft language change and bring it back to council. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION AND SECOND TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR AN ESTIMATED TEN MINUTES. MOTION PASSED 7-0 AT 11:39 PM. The council recessed into executive session for the purpose of discussing a legal issue, per RCW 42.30.110 (1)(i) and no action was anticipated following executive session. City Councilmembers Adam, Biglow, Blazey, Lawrence, Phelps, Rudolph and Vall- Spinosa; City Attorney Wayne Tanaka; and City Manager Doug Schulze were present. Executive session adjourned and the city council reconvened into regular session at 12:00 am. No action was taken. ADJOURNMENT The October 9, 2006, Regular Meeting of the Medina City Council adjourned by consensus at 12:00 am. The next City Council Regular Meeting will be held Monday, November 13, 2006 at 7:00 pm. An Executive Session will begin at 5:30 pm to discuss labor negotiations, per RCW 42.30.110 (1)(g). The public portion of the meeting will begin at 7:00 pm. Miles R. Adam, Mayor Attest: Rachel Baker, City Clerk City Council Minutes October 9, 2006 Page 6 ITEM F-2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES October 18, 2006 6:30 pm CALL TO ORDER DRAFT Medina City Hall 501 Evergreen Point Road Miles Adam called the October 18, 2006, Medina City Council Special Meeting to order at 6:45 pm. ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present: Miles Adam, Drew Blazey, Katie Phelps, and Pete Vail-Spinosa Councilmembers Absent: Lucius Biglow, Jim Lawrence, and Robert Rudolph EXECUTIVE SESSION The city council convened in executive session at 6:48 pm, for the purpose of interviewing candidates for the position of interim city manager per RCW 42.30.110 (1)(g). Action was anticipated and duration of the session was expected to be two hours. MOTION VALL-SPINOSA AND SECOND PHELPS TO ADJOURN EXECUTIVE SESSION. MOTION PASSED 4-0 AT 8:30 PM. Executive session adjourned and council reconvened into open session at 8:30 pm. MOTION PHELPS AND SECOND VALL-SPINOSA TO APPOINT ROGER CRUM TO THE POSITION OF INTERIM CITY MANAGER. MOTION PASSED 4-0 AT 8:45 PM. MOTION BLAZEYAND SECOND VALL-SPINOSA TO SELECT WALDRON & CO. TO MANAGE SEARCH FOR A PERMANENT CITY MANAGER, BEGINNING IMMEDIATELY. MOTION PASSED 4-0 AT 9:50 PM. ADJOURNMENT MOTION BLAZEY AND SECOND PHELPS TO ADJOURN THE OCTOBER 18, 2006 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING. MOTION PASSED 4-0 AT 9:51 PM. The October 18, 2006, Special Meeting of the Medina City Council adjourned at 9:51 pm. Miles R. Adam, Mayor Attest: Rachel Baker, City Clerk of AAFD��9 CITY OF MEDINA Memorandum DATE: November 13, 2006 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jan Burdue, CPFA RE: Finance Report - October 2006 General Fund Revenues Item F-3 ➢ Sales and Use Tax is 88% of the annual budget projections or $139,378 above the projected budget for this time of year. ➢ Building Permits has reached 136% of the annual budget projections or $337,837 above the projected budgeted amount for this time of year. ➢ Investment Interest is 193% of the annual budget projections or $148,438 above the projected budget for this time of year. Expenditures Departmental expenditures are meeting budget projections. 0 tn tn rn 0 00 W) M O O M 00 O O M fV O O �D `7 M N M V) �. O O C =w G M w�'pq.a O u O 60s � O OH yq 64 0000 O O N N M O tn f+l f+1 �--� O en ON oo •-: .-+ N O v O a .,r W yq 69 W S ►� ad at 6s O � W 00 o ON c 0 � � 00 00 °° 6 GOCI � w w r- t- 00 o �p M et d' en N ' cl O C :. _ COci L � O O ti H a z z a w w 0 d C7 w H a. U z P r�V ") vi 00 00 � N � �p �O H z w H w z x a, � zz d 0 3� O to kn O O ch t-- ID C4 m O t�''7 N kn n �p .-� M 1� .-• O O .D U M O C W v E y CL 0, O G W) Ln 'n a L F 69 O O O O ti N D N 00 CN N Q Ch R N ON M F N 6> >t M a w W 49 N9 O h 00 O 00 N 00 O O O a O N r4 00 b O •rT..4 i M a �o z o .� GM A ci w >( 0 C> , Co, aLi A rr 00 0o er C N N to OO H F `" "9 V as Ov co � r- 4n 00 L O a � tr; r� co O O O N r co Q O a b fn �O 1 404 6% �O 00 OM 00 O O O 1tn �D CD '7 Ln 1-- [n cT O C y N r N n N b N O GC ,..� el' N r- '7 pW W N ... ... m a W ti (A �s A F z a c a w ; = a a > a w x v w rx Ea-' a v z OF r, m I �c 0\ 00 n m 4D O C'4 en 00 00 r 00 Fr' v z w F (f) 60c) W z � O x a z w 3U ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION GENERAL FUND City of Medina MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT -- Oet M.T.D. Y.T.D. RECEIPTS RECEIPTS PROPERTY & SALES TAX 001 000 000 311 10 00 00 General Property Taxes 001 000 000 311 10 00 01 Gen'l Prop Taxes - Ad Valorem 001 000 000 313 10 00 00 Local Retail Sales & Use Tax 001 000 000 313 71 00 00 Criminal Justice Funding TOTAL PROPERTY & SALES TAX LICENSES & PERMITS 001 000 000 322 10 00 00 Building Permits 001 000 000 322 30 00 00 Animal Licenses 001 000 000 322 90 00 00 Gun Permits TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS 001 000 000 334 01 10 00 State Grant-Crim Just Training 001 000 000 334 03 50 00 State Grant -Traffic Safety Com 001 000 000 334 06 99 00 State Grant -KC -Emergency Mgmt 001 000 000 336 06 21 00 MVET-Criminal Justice -Pop. 001 000 000 336 06 26 00 Criminal Justice -Special 001 000 000 336 06 51 00 DUI/Other Criminal Justice 001 000 000 336 06 94 00 Liquor Excise Tax 001 000 000 336 06 95 00 Liquor Control Board Profits 001 000 000 338 21 00 00 Hunts Point Police Contract 001 000 000 338 23 00 00 Detention/Correction-Jail TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL CHGS FOR GOODS AND SERVICES 100 000 341 99 00 00 Passport & Naturalization Fees 00 000 342 10 00 00 Law Enforcement Services 001 000 000 342 90 00 10 Other -Lifeguard Services 001 000 000 347 60 00 00 Program Fees TOTAL CHGS FOR GOODS/SERVICES FINES & FORFEITURES 001 000 000 353 10 00 00 Municipal Court -Traffic Infrac 001 000 000 356 90 00 00 Other Criminal Non -Traffic TOTAL FINES & FORFEITURES MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 001 000 000 361 11 00 00 Investment Interest 001 000 000 361 40 00 00 Sales Interest 001 000 000 362 20 00 00 Equipment Lease (Long -Term) 001 000 000 367 00 00 00 Park Donations 001 000 000 369 30 00 10 Confiscated Property -Auction 001 000 000 369 90 00 00 Other 001 000 000 369 90 00 05 Other-Cd1a 001 000 000 369 90 00 10 Other -Copies 001 000 000 369 90 00 15 Other -Fingerprinting 001 000 000 369 90 00 20 Other -KC PAGE 1 k OF REMAINING ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPECTATION 549,492.56 1,707,544.31 2,147,610.00 79.51 440,065.69 255.62- 18,909.48- .00 .00 18,909.48 66,085.04 889,378.32 1,000,000.00 88.94 110,621.68 5,504.42 54,879.78 55,000.00 99.78 120.22 620,826.40 2,632,992.93 3,202,610.00 82.21 569,717.07 87,326.14 750,337.06 550,000.00 136.42 200,337.06- 62.00 802.00 1,000.00 80.20 198.00 32.00 227.00 .00 .00 227.00- 87,420.14 751,366.06 551,000.00 136.36 200,366.06- .00 10,314.43 .00 .00 10,314.43- .00 1,297.50 2,000.00 64.88 702.50 .00 39,945.31 .00 .00 39,945.31- 250.00 1,000.00 600.00 166.67 400.00- 560.66 2,204.25 2,100.00 104.96 104.25- 121.51 486.93 500.00 97.39 13.07 3,584.34 12,565.24 11,500.00 109.26 1,065.24- .00 14,233.97 21,700.00 65.59 7,466.03 .00 120,759.00 161,012.00 75.00 40,253.00 .00 834.35 .00 .00 834.35- 4,516.53 203,640.98 199,412.00 102.12 4,228.98- 960.00 10,590.00 10,000.00 105.90 590.00- 1,610.00 5,968.40 .00 .00 5,968.40- .00 60.00 .00 .00 60.00- .00 1,220.00 2,000.00 61.00 780,00 2,570.00 17,838.40 12,000.00 148.65 5,838.40- 6,812,99 55,216.96 100,000.00 55.22 44,783.04 .00 56.26 .00 .00 56.26- 6,812.99 55,273.22 100,000.00 55.27 44,726.78 28,112.07 242,188.68 125,000.00 193.75 117,188.68- 278.53 3,202.30 1,500.00 213.49 1,702.30- .00 932.00 2,796.00 33.33 1,864.00 .00 26,952.49 .00 .00 26,952.49- .00 455.92 .00 .00 455.92- 8,825.19 12,646.24 .00 .00 12,646.24- 15.00 45.00 .00 .00 45.00- 171.95 11061.01 .00 .00 1,061.01- 31.50 74.50 .00 .00 74.50- .00 102.24 .00 .00 102.24- City of Medina MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT ^�� Q1, W06 �1Cuuocr V PAGE 2 M.T.D. Y.T.D. OF REMAINING \CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION RECEIPTS RECEIPTS ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPECTATION 001 000 000 369 90 00 25 Other -Maps .00 121.00 .00 .00 121.00- 001 000 000 369 90 00 30 Other-Medina50th-Medallions 50.00 150.00 .00 .00 150.0.0- 001 000 000 369 90 00 32 Other -Medina 50th-Sweatehirts .00 10.00 .00 .00 10.00- 001 000 000 369 90 00 34 Other -Medina 50th-Mug .00 3.00 .00 .00 3.00- 001 000 000 369 90 00 35 Other -Notary 10.00 118.00 .00 .00 118.00- 001 000 000 369 90 00 40 Other -Postage 1.02 204.88 .00 .00 204.88- 001 000 000 369 90 00 45 Other -Reports 35.25 178.60 .00 .00 178.60- TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 37,530.51 288,445.86 129,296,00 223.09 159,149.86- NONREVENUES 001 000 000 389 00 00 00 Other Non -Revenues (pass thru) .00 .00 195,000.00 .00 195,000.00 001 000 000 389 00 00 10 Attorney .00 750.00 .00 .00 750.00- 001 000 000 389 00 00 20 Building Inspector 24.00 7,050.53 .00 .00 7,050.53- 001 000 000 389 00 00 30 Building Official 1,377.30 26,652.10 .00 .00 26,652.10- 001 000 000 389 00 00 50 Engineer 10,434.04 82,304.62 .00 .00 82,304.62- 001 000 000 389 00 00 60 Landscape Architect 1,491.47 30,a08.90 .00 .00 30,808.90- 001 000 000 389 00 00 70 Planner 4,874.50 8,915.50 .00 .00 81915.50- TOTAL NONREVENUES 18,201.31 156,481.65 195,000.00 80.25 38,519.35 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 777,877.88 4,105,939.10 4,389,318.00 93.54 283,378.90 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT oetob R, 31, 20" PAGE 1 M.T.D. Y.T.D. %OF UNEXPENDED CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED TOTAL BALANCE GENERAL FUND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 001 000 000 511 60 41 00 Professional Services 001 000 000 511 60 41 10 Prof Serv-SR520 Mitigation 001 000 000 511 60 41 20 Prof Serv-Jet Noise Mitigation 001 000 000 511 60 43 00 Travel & Training 001 000 000 511 60 49 00 Miscellaneous 001 000 000 511 80 51 00 Elections Serv-Voter Reg Costs TOTAL LEGISLATIVE SERVICES .00 3,150.00 .00 .00 3,150.00- .00 .00 10,000.00 .00 10,000.00 .00 .00 10,000.00 .00 10,000.00 .00 229.83 5,000.00 4.60 4,770.17 120.00 1,275.19 5,000.00 25.50 3,724.81 76.82 5,844.91 5,000.00 116.90 844.91- 196.82 10,499.93 35,000.00 30.00 24,500.07 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT nr_l� 31, i"nQ PAGE 2 Vl'u.11lrC,T M.T.D. W Y.T.D. % OF UNEXPENDED CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED TOTAL BALANCE MUNICIPAL COURT 001 000 000 512 50 41 10 Prosecuting. Attorney 8,000.00 36,653.40 45,000.00 81.45 8,346.60 001 000 000 512 50 41 20 Public Defender 1,160.00 5,075.00 8,000.00 63.44 2,925.00 001 000 000 512 50 41 30 Expert Witness .00 .00 1,000.00 .00 11000,00 001 000 000 512 50 51 10 Municipal Court-Traffic/NonTrf 11,360.50 37,085.50 70,000.00 52.98 32,914.50 TOTAL MUNICIPAL COURT 20,520.50 78,813.90 124,000.00 63.56 45,186.10 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT October St 2006 M.T.D. Y.T.D. COUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED EXECUTIVE SALARIES & WAGES 001 000000 513 10 11 00 Salaries & Wages TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES PERSONNEL BENEFITS o01 000 000 513 10 21 00 Personnel Benefits TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES 001 000 000 513 10 35 00 Small Toole/Minor Equipment 001 000 000 513 10 43 00 Travel & Training 001 000 000 513 10 49 00 Miscellaneous 001 000 000 513 10 49 01 Dues, Subsc, Auto Allowance TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES TOTAL EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT PAGE 3 i OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 12,611.10 87,236.04 103,000.00 84.70 15,763.96 12,611.10 87,236.04 103,000.00 84.70 15,763.96 1,016.19 19,160.31 25,000.00 76.64 5,839.69 1,016.19 19,160.31 25,000.00 76.64 5,839.69 .00 380.78 500.00 76.16 119.22 1,208.42 3,831.27 4,000.00 95.78 168.73 235.87 7,912.54 15,000.00 52.75 7,087.46 250.00 3,726.85 4,100.00 90.90 373.15 1,694.29 15,851.44 23,600.00 67.17 7,748.56 15,321.58 122,247.79 151,600.00 80.64 29,352.21 City of Medina MONTHLY -� EXPENDITURE EXP-�ENDD ITURREREPORT Oetobe ' 314 20VV M.T.D. Y.T.D. CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED FINANCE DEPARTMENT SALARIES & WAGES 001 000 000 514 10 11 00 Salaries & Wages TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES PERSONNEL BENEFITS 001 000 000 514 10 21 00 Personnel Benefits TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 001 000 000 514 10 43 00 Travel & Training 001 000 000 514 10 49 00 Misc-Dues,Subscriptions 001 000 000 514 10 51 00 Intergvtml Prof Serv-Auditors TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT PAGE 4 t OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 5,106.00 51,080.00 61,560.00 82.98 10,480.00 5,108.00 51,080.00 61,560.00 82.98 10,480.00 1,098.10 10,634.13 12,700.00 83.73 2,065.87 1,098.10 10,634.13 12,700.00 83.73 2,065.87 204.13 1,608.83 3,500.00 45.97 1,891.17 .00 653.92 750.00 87.19 96.08 .00 8,996.00 9,360.00 96.11 364.00 204.13 11,258.75 13,610.00 82.72 2,351.25 6,410.23 72,972.88 87,870.00 83.05 14,897.12 _COUNT NUMBER ool 000 000.515 20 41 10 on 000 000 515 20 41 60 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT October 31, 20" M.T.D. Y.T.D. DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED LEGAL DEPARTMENT City Attorney Special Counsel TOTAL LEGAL DEPARTMENT 27,472.00 91,089.54 120,000.00 11,316.60 13,563.60 .00 38,788.60 104,653.14 120,000.00 PAGE 5 4 OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 75.91 28,910.46 .00 13,563.60- 87.21 15,346.86 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT ��_L �/�/v 31, 2006 PAGE 6 VC� M.T.D. Y.T.D. 1k OF UNEXPENDED =COUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED TOTAL BALANCE CENTRAL SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES 001 000 000 518 10 11 00 Salaries & Wages 12,521.48 115,849.43 153,000.00 75.72 37,150.57 001 000 000 518 10 12 00 overtime .00 .00 500.00 .00 500.00 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 12,521.48 115,849.43 153,500.00 75.47 37,650.57 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 001 000 000 518 10 21 00 Personnel Benefits 4,926.16 42,678.27 52,000.00 82.07 9,321.73 TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS 4,926.16 42,678.27 52,000.00 82.07 9,321.73 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 001 000 000 518 10 31 00 Office and Operating Supplies 1,652.28 11,603.61 20,000.00 58.02 8,396.39 001 000 000 918 10 41 00 Professional Services 130.00 11,169.52 12,000.00 93.08 830.48 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 Postage/Telephone 2,205.07 20,595.67 22,000.00 93.62 1,404.33 001 000 000 518 10 43 00 Travel & Training 444.42 8,059.42 4,500.00 179.10 3,559.42- 001 000 000 S18 10 44 00 Advertising 1,606.30 4,150.18 8,000.00 51.88 3,849.82 001 000 000 518 10 46 00 Insurance (WCIA) .00 78,370.00 92,020.00 85.17 13,650.00 001 000 000 518 10 47 00 Utility Serv-Elec,Water,Waste 3,133.87 9,601.72 9,000.00 106.69 601.72- 001 000 000 518 10 48 00 Repairs & Maint-Equipment 143.75 2,634.82 .00 .00 2,634.82- 001 000 000 518 10 49 10 Miscellaneous 92.81 3,284.53 7,500.00 43.79 4,215.47 001 000 000 518 10 49 20 Dues, Subscriptions .00 2,555.10 950.00 268.96 1,605.10- 001 000 000 518 10 49 30 Newsletter 1,273.54 20,920.82 33,000.00 63.40 12,079.18 001 000 000 518 10 49 40 Photocopies 148.84 305.78 2,000.00 15.29 1,694.22 TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 10,830.88 173,251.17 210,970.00 82.12 37,718.83 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 001 000 000 518 30 45 00 Facility Rental 725.20 4,143.60 6,500.00 63,75 2,356.40 001 000 000 518 30 48 00 Repairs/Maint-City Hall Bldg 2,248.19 13,651.81 20,000.00 68.26 6,348.19 TOTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,973.39 17,795.41 26,500.00 67.1E 8,704.59 SUBTOTAL CENTRAL SERVICES 31,251.91 349,574.28 442,970.00 78.92 93,395.72 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT Oet b .431, "06 M.T.D. Y.T.D. CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 001 000 000 518 90 41 50 Technical Services 001 000 000 516 90 48 00 Repairs & Main -Equipment TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 001 000 000 519 90 49 00 Association of WA Cities 001 000 000 519 90 49 01 Puget Sound Regional Council 001 000 000 519 90 49 02 Suburban Cities Association 001 000 000 519 90 49 03 ARCH 001 000 000 519 90 49 04 Eastside Transportation Prog. 001 000 000 519 90 49 06 Eastside Domestic Violence odl o00 000 519 90 49 07 Bellevue Highland Center 001 000 000 519 90 49 09 OASI Program-Employmt Security 001 000 000 519 90 51 10 King County Health Services 001 000 000 519 90 51 20 Puget Sound Clean Air Agency 001 000 000 519 90 51 30 King County Alcohol Control 001 000 000 519 90 51 40 King County Water & Land Resou 001 000 000 519 90 51 so WA St Dept of Information Sery 001 000 000 519 90 51 60 WA St Purchasing 6 Contract TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL TOTAL CENTRAL SERVICES 1,615.00 449.78 2,064.78 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 25.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 25.00 33,341.69 9,201.56 17,892.45 27,094.01 1,245.12 .00 1,310.15 12,244.00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 .00 5,021.00 464.85 72.12 .00 500.00 20,901.24 397,575.53 15,000.00 20,000.00 35,000.00 1,245.82 450.00 1,500.00 15,000.00 100.00 1,700.00 1,700.00 .00 175.00 5,021.00 500.00 2,000.00 500.00 .00 29,891.82 507,861.82 PAGE 7 % OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 61.34 5,796.44 89.46 2,107.55 77.41 7,905.99 99.94 .70 .00 450.00 87.34 189.85 81.63 2,756.00 .00 100.00 .00 1,700.00 .00 1,700.00 .00 50.00- .00 175.00 100.00 .00 92.97 35.15 3.61 1,927.88 .00 500.00 .00 500.00- 69.94 8,984.56 78.28 110,286.29 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT cwto m 31, M.T.D. Y.T.D. 1CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 001 000 000 521 20 51 00 Dispatch Services 001 000 000 521 20 51 10 Dispatch Services -Kirkland 001 000 000 521 20 51 20 Dispatch-SPSCA 001 000 000 521 20 51 30 Access-WSP 001 000 000 521 20 51 40 Marine Patrol -Mercer Island 001 000 000 521 20 51 50 Jail Service -Prisoner Board 001 000 000 521 20 51 60 Prisoner Transport 001 000 000 521 20 51 80 Domestic Violence -Kirkland 001 000 000 521 20 51 85 IT Services -Kirkland TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERV CAPITAL OUTLAY 001 000 000521 20 64 10 Furniture & Equipment TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 9 t OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 1,650.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 16,510.76 49,532.26 66,460.00 74.53 16,927.74 998.52 5,712.60 6,450.00 88.57 737.40 930.00 2,790.00 3,720.00 75.00 930.00 .00 .00 50,000.00 .00 50,000.00 7,902.24 40,068.95 36,000.00 111.30 4,068.95- .00 900.00 1,000.00 90.00 100.00 388.12 1,565.00 2,000.00 78.25 435.00 13,883.50 15,156.66 11,900.00 127.37 3,256.66- 38,963.14 115,725.47 177,530.00 65.19 61,804.53 .00 .00 1,000.00 .00 1,000.00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .00 1,000.00 132,897.00 991,252.48 1,406,638.00 70.47 415,385.52 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITUREREPORT ARREP��ORT oetobm 31, 20" M.T.D. Y.T.D. CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED FIRE & MEDICAL AID DEPARTMENT INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 001 000 000 522 20 51 00 Fire Control Services TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL TOTAL FIRE & MEDICAL DEPT PAGE 10 % OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 290,986.50 581,973.00 581,973.00 100.00 .00 290,986.50 581,973.00 581,973.00 100.00 .00 290,986.50 581,973.00 581,973.00 100.00 .00 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT A�_ier 31L i�0" PAGE 12 l)C�A/UCl M.T.D. .D/vim Y.T.D. w OF UNEXPENDED CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED TOTAL BALANCE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SUPPLIES 001 000 000 525 60 31 00 Supplies 1,022.71 25,430.26 50,000.00 50.86 24,569.72 001 000 000 525 60 31 01 Supplies -Citizen Emer Response .00 3,487.43 .00 .00 3,487.43- TOTAL SUPPLIES 1,022.71 28,917.71 50,000.00 57.84 21,082.29 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 001 000 000 525 60 41 00 Professional Services 4,431.50 31,241.77 40,000.00 78.10 8,758,23 001 000 000 525 60 41 01 Prof Serv-CERT 450.00 1,050.00 .00 .00 11050.00- 001 000 000 525 60 46 00 Repairs & Maint-Coach .00 6,167.98 .00 .00 6,167.96- TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 4,881.50 36,459.75 40,000.00 96.15 1,540.25 TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 5,904.21 67,377.46 90,000.00 74.86 22,622.54 City of Medina MONTHLy EXPENDITURE REPORT oetobmai, 20" M.T.D. Y.T.D. EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANNING DEPARTMENT SALARIES & WAGES 001 000 000 558 60 11 00 Salaries & Wages TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES PERSONNEL BENEFITS 001 000 000 558 60 21 00 Personnel Benefits TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS SUPPLIES 001 000 000 558 60 31 00 Operating Supplies TOTAL SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 001 000 000 558 60 41 01 Planning Consultant 001 000 000 558 60 41 02 Hearing Examiner 001 000 000 558 60 41 05 Building Official Consultant 001 000 000 558 60 41 06 Building Inspector Consultant 001 000 000 558 60 41 07 Engineering Consultant 001 000 000 558 60 41 50 Landscape Consultant 001 000 000 558 60 42 00 Communications 001 000 000 558 60 43 00 Travel & Training OD1 000 000 558 60 49 00 Dues,Subscriptions,Memberships 001 000 000 558 60 64 00 Furniture & Equipment TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES TOTAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT PAGE 13 V OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 10,866.12 108,661.20 132,276.00 82.15 23,614.80 10,866.12 108,661.20 132,276.00 82.15 23,614.80 3,389.19 32,383.80 36,385.00 89.00 4,001.20 3,389.19 32,383.80 36,385.00 89.00 4,001.20 15.24 73.23 1,200.00 6.10 1,126.77 15.24 73.23 1,200.00 6.10 1,126.77 4,056.50 19,134.50 75,000.00 25.51 55,865.50 5,950.00 6,050.00 35,000.00 17.29 28,950.00 21,152.83 138,808.90 125,000.00 111.05 13,808.90- 10,650.40 74,646.25 75,000.00 99.53 353.75 49,309.60 200,397.23 120,000.00 167.00 80,397.23- 11,338.51 61,486.14 90,000.00 68.32 28,513.96 49.57 478.76 1,800.00 26.60 1,321.24 .00 87.27 5,100.00 1.71 5,012,73 .00 410.00 1,000.00 41.00 590.00 .00 2,911.54 3,500.00 83.19 588.46 102,507.61 504,410.59 531,400.00 94.92 26,989.41 116,778.16 645,528.82 701,261.00 92.05 55,732.18 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT October 31, 2006 M.T.D. Y.T.D. CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED RECREATION -LIFEGUARDS SALARIES & WAGES 001 000 000 574 20 11 00 Salaries & Wages 001 000 000 574 20 12 00 Overtime TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES PERSONNEL BENEFITS 001 000 000 574 20 21 00 Personnel Benefits 001 000 000 574 20 22 00 Uniforms TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS SUPPLIES 001 000 000 574 20 31 00 Operating Supplies TOTAL SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 001 000 000 574 20 43 00 Travel & Training 001 000 000 574 20 44 00 Advertising 001 000 000 574 20 49 00 Miscellaneous TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES TOTAL RECREATION -LIFEGUARDS PAGE 14 t OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE .00 12,943-75 19,024.00 68.04 6,080.25 .00 1,617.36 .00 .00 1,617.38- .00 14,561.13 19,024.00 76.54 4,462.87 .00 2,495.83 2,200.00 113.45 295.83- 519.05 830.60 300.00 276.87 530.60- 519.05 3,326.43 2,500.00 133.06 826.43- .00 259.56 500.00 51.91 240.44 .00 259.56 500.00 51.91 240.44 .00 .00 500.00 .00 500.00 .00 .00 300.00 .00 300.00 .00 .00 350.00 .00 350.00 .00 .00 1,150.00 .00 1,150.00 519.05 18,147.12 23,174.00 78.31 5,026.88 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT October 31, 20M M.T.D. Y.T.D. CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED PARRS DEPARTMENT SALARIES & WAGES 001 000 000 576 80 11.00 Salaries & Wages 001 000 000 S76 80 12 00 Overtime TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES PERSONNEL BENEFITS 001 000 000 576 80 21 00 Personnel Benefits 001 000 000 S76 80 22 00 Uniforms TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS SUPPLIES 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 Operating Supplies 001 000 000 576 80 31 01 Maintenance Supplies 001 000 000 576 80 32 00 vehicle Fuel & Lube TOTAL SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 001 000 000 S76 80 41 00 Professional Services =001 000 000 576 80 41 04 Professional Services -Mist 001 000 000 S76 80 42 00 Telephone/Postage 001 000 000 S76 80 43 00 Travel & Training 001 000 000 S76 60 47 00 Utilities 601.000 000 576 80 48 00 Repair & Maint Equipment 001 000 000 576 80 49 00 Miscellaneous 001 000 000 576 80 49 01 Misc-Property Tax TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY r' 000 000 576 80 63 00 Park Improvements 00 000 576 80 64 00 Furniture and Equipment TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL PARRS DEPARTMENT PAGE 15 % OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 14,217.32 137,378.43 172,200.00 79.78 34,821.57 .00 1,315.76 2,500.00 52.63 1,184.24 14,217.32 138,694.19 174,700.00 79.39 36,005.81 4,627.20 39,947.17 46,800.00 85.36 6,952.83 365.8S 811.59 2,S00.00 32.46 1,688.41 4,993.OS 40,758.76 49,300.00 82.67 6,541.24 5,250.20 20,160.70 27,000.00 74..67 6,839.30 234.41 2,396.35 9,000.00 26.63 6,603.65 1,254.28 4,834.90 9,000.00 53.72 4,165.10 6,736.89 27,391.95 45,000.00 60.87 17,608.05 8,181.49 21,685.68 35,000.00 61.96 13,314.32 669.44 3,266.06 9,000.00 36.29 5,733.94 99.73 426.15 4,000.00 10.65 3,573.85 250.00 2,926.33 5,000.00 58.53 2,073.67 399.92 4,429.86 6,000.00 73.83 1,570.14 .00 5,187.44 4,000.00 129.69 1,187.44- 590.88 2,378.98 5,000.00 47.58 2,621.02 .00 209.43 .00 .00 209.43- 10,181.46 40,509.93 68,000.00 59.57 27,490.07 1,793.38 54,902.97 50,000.00 109.81 4,902.97- .00 .00 1,500.00 .00 1,500.00 1,793.38 54,902.97 51,500.00 106.61 3,402.97- 37,924.10 302,257.80 386,500.00 77.80 86,242.20 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT 1)ACte/�—�RrCI Q1, 06 PAGE 16 M.T.D. e].. T . D .. IV Y.T.D. k OF UNEXPENDED CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED TOTAL BALANCE OPERATING TRANSFERS 001 000 000 591 00 20 00 Equipment Replacement Fund 001 000 000 597 00 30 00 Street Fund 001 000 000 597 00 50 00 Park Property Debt Sery Fund TOTAL OPERATING TRANSFERS .00 77,000.00 77,000.00 100.00 .00 258,906.92 258,906.92 100.00 .00 218,500.11 218,500.11 100.00 .00 554,407.03 554,407.03 100.00 00 00 00 00 TOTAL EXPENSES 699,588.44 3,947,706.88 4,772,284.85 82.72 824,577.97 City of Medina MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT October 31, 2006 M.T.D. CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION RECEIPTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 100 000 000 395 10 00 00 Sale of Equipment Property TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES TRANSFERS 100 000 000 397 00 10 00 From General Fund TOTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAGE 3 Y.T.D. OF REMAINING RECEIPTS ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPECTATION 00 .00 4,000.00 .00 4,000.00 00 .00 4,000.00 .00 4,000.00 00 77,000.00 77,000.00 100.00 .00 00 77,000.00 77,000.00 100.00 .00 00 77,000.00 81,000.00 95.06 4,000.00 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITUREREPORT Oetebm 31,20M M.T.D. Y.T.D. tCCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY 100 000 000 521 50 64 00 Police -Automobile 100 000 000 541 50 64 00 Public Works -Equipment TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAGE 17 t OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 1,304.00 40,657.40 44,500.00 91.36. 3,842.60 .00 1,711.66 .00 .00 1,711.66- 1,304.00 42,369.06 44,500.00 95.21 2,130.94 1,304.00 42,369.06 44,500.00 95.21 2,130.94 CitY of Medina MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT October 31, 20" M.T.D. .000UNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION RECEIPTS CITY STREET FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 101 000 000 333 20 20 00 Surface Transportation Program 101 000 000 336 00 87 00 Motor Fuel Tax(Unrestricted) TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 101 000 000 397 00 10 00 From General Fund TOTAL OPERATING TRANSFERS TOTAL CITY STREET FUND PAGE 4 Y.T.D. OF REMAINING RECEIPTS ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPECTATION .00 48,605.00 .00 .00 6,467.47 55,811.98 70,000.00 79.73 6,467.47 104,416.98 70,000.00 149.17 .00 258,906.92 258,906.92 100.00 .00 258,906.92 258,906.92 100.00 6,467.47 363,323.90 328,906.92 110.46 48,605.00- 14,188.02 34,416.98- .00 .00 34,416.98- City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT Oetebm 31, 24"6 PAGE 18 M.T.D. Y.T.D. OF UNEXPENDED CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED TOTAL BALANCE CITY STREET FUND SALARIES & WAGES 101 000 000 542 30 11 00 Salaries & Wages 10,734.91 126,127.31 165,000.00 76.44 38,872.69 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 10,734.91 126,127.31 165,000.00 76.44 38,872.69 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 101 000 000 542 30 21 00 Personnel Benefits 3,571.01 36,854.2E 46,000.00 80.12 9,145.75 101 000 000 542 30 22 00 Uniforms 69.00 813.66 2,500.00 32.55 1,686.34 TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS 3,640.01 37,667.91 48,500.00 77.67 10,832.09 ROAD & STREET MAINTENANCE 101 000 000 542 30 31 00 Operating Supplies 1,284.01 3,607.72 6,000.00 60.13 2,392.28 101 000 000 542 30 35 00 Small Toole/Minor Equipment 78.27 447.10 1,500.00 29.81 1,052.90 101 000 000 542 30 41 00 Professional Services 411.94 21,508.04 65,000.00 33.09 43,491.96 101 000 000 542 30 41 10 Road & Street Maintenance .00 11,177.92 90,000.00 12.42 78,822.08 101 000 000 542 30 45 00 Machine Rental .00 932.08 3,500.00 26.63 2,567.92 101 000 000 542 30 47 00 Utility Services 96.60 2,008.68 1,000.00 200.87 11008.68- 101 000 000 542 30 48 00 Equipment Maintenance 146.16 1,545.12 4,000.00 38.63 2,454.88 101 000 000 542 40 41 00 Storm Drain Maintenance 2,735.43 15,255.85 45,000.00 33.90 29,744.15 101 000 000 542 63 41 00 Street Light Utilities 3,174.48 12,565.27 21,000.00 59.83 8,434.73 101 000 000 542 64 41 00 Traffic Control Devices .00 1,832.23 5,000.00 36.64 3,167.77 101 000 000 542 66 41 00 Snow & Ice Removal .00 .00 1,000.00 .00 1,000.00 101 000 000 542 67 41 00 Street Cleaning .00 1,743.51 15,000.00 11.62 13,256.49 TOTAL ROAD & ST MAINTENANCE 7,926.89 72,623.52 258,000.00 28.15 185,376.48 TOTAL CITY STREET FUND 22,301.81 236,418.74 471,500.00 50.14 235,081.26 City of Medina MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT October 31, 2006 M.T.D. 'CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION RECEIPTS TREE FUND MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 103 000 000 389 00 50 00 Other NonRevenues-Tree Replace TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TOTAL TREE FUND .00 .00 .00 PAGE 6 Y.T.D. & OF REMAINING RECEIPTS ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPECTATION 15,265.05 .00 .00 15,265.05- 15,265.05 .00 .00 1S,265.05- 15,265.05 .00 .00 15,265.05- City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT October 314 woo M.T.D. Y.T.D. 4CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED TREE FUND OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 103 000 000 589 00 49 10 Miscellaneous -Tree Replacement TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES TOTAL TREE FUND PAGE 20 OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 00 2,420.34 20,000.00 12.10 17,579.66 00 2,420.34 20,000.00 12.10 17,579.66 00 2,420.34 20,000.00 12.10 17,579.66 City of Medina MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Oetobm 31, 2006 M.T.D. CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION RECEIPTS PARK PROP DEBT SERV FUND CASH ON HAND TRANSFERS 200 000 000 397 00 10 00 From General Fund .00 TOTAL TRANSFERS .00 TOTAL PARK PROP DEBT SERV FUND .00 PAGE 7 Y.T.D. % OF REMAINING RECEIPTS ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPECTATION 218,500.11 218,500.11 100.00 .00 218,500.11 218,500.11 100.00 .00 218,500.11 218,500.11 100.00 .00 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT October 314 20M PAGE 21 M.T.D. Y.T.D. } OF UNEXPENDED ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED TOTAL BALANCE PARK PROP. DEBT SERVICE FUND PARK PROP DEBT PRINCIPAW INT. 200 000 000 591 76 77 00 Principal .00 284,409.71 TOTAL PARK PROP DEBT PRIN/INT. .00 284,409.71 TOTAL PARK PROP DEBT SERV FUND .00 284,409.71 284,409.71 100.00 .00 284,409.71 100,00 .00 284,409.71 100.00 .00 City of Medina MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT October 31, 2006 M.T.D. ,CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION RECEIPTS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND TAXES 307 000 000 317 34 00 00 Real Estate Excise Tax 1 307 000 000 317 35 00 00 Real Estate Excise Tax 2 307 000 000 334 03 90 00 Grant -Sidewalks TOTAL TAXES MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND PAGE 9 Y.T.D. $ OF REMAINING RECEIPTS ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPECTATION 37,925.48 399,339.06 325,000.00 122.87 74,339.06- 37,925.48 399,339.06 325,000.00 122.87 74,339.06- .00 .00 48,605.00 .00 48,605.00 75,850.96 798,678.12 698,605.00 114.32 100,073.12- 75,850.96 798,678.12 698,605.00 114.32 100,073.12- CCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT October 31,20" PAGE 22 M.T.D. Y.T.D. t OF UNEXPENDED EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED TOTAL BALANCE IMPROVEMENTS 307.000 000 595 30 03 00 Medina Park Improvements 307 000 000 595 30 63 01 Road Construction 307 000 000 595 30 63 02 Storm Sewer Construction 307 000 000 595 30 63 03 Park Improvements 307 000 000 595 30 63 10 Sidewalk-82nd Ave/NE 8th St 307 000 000 595 30 63 11 Facility Structural Analysis TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 968.37 .00 .00 7,160.98 .00 .00 8,129.35 8,129.35 9,133.81 .00 106,430.84 270,000.00 .00 100,000.00 77,549.41 593,000.00 753.03 250,000.00 280.00 150,000.00 194,147.09 1,363,000.00 194,147.09 1,363,000.00 .00 9,133.81- 39.42 163,569.16 .00 100,000.00 13.08 515,450.59 .30 249,246.97 .19 149,720.00 14.24 1,168,852.91 14.24 1,168,852.91 City of Medina MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Oetobm e431, 2006 M.T.D. ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION RECEIPTS NON -REVENUE TRUST FUND NON -REVENUES 631 000 000 389 00 10 01 Security Dep-Fisher, Scott 631 000000 389 00 10 02 Security Dep-Medina Fine Homes 631 000 000 389 00 10 03 Security Dep-Burke, J Michael 631 000 000 389 00 10 04 Security Dep-John Day Homes 631 000 000 389 00 10 05 Security Dep-Brunell, Anne 631 000 000 389 00 10 10 Security Dep-Konen 631 000 000 389 00 10 20 Security Dep-Medina Place 631 000 000 389 00 20 10 Park Bench -Tiles 631 000 000 389 12 52 01 WA St -Bldg Code Fee 631 000 000 389 12 52 03 WA St -Judicial Info Systems 631 000 000 389 12 52 06 WA St -State Portion 631 000 000 389 12 52 07 WA St -State 30% 631 000 000 389 12 52 08 WA St -Trauma Care 631 000 000 389 12 52 09 WA St-Lab-Bld/Breath 631 000 000 389 12 52 10 WA St -Litter Control 631 000 000 389 12 52 12 WA St -State Portion-PSEA 3 631 000 000 389 12 52 88 Dept Of Lic-Gun Permit-$18/21 631 000 000 389 12 52 89 WA St Patrol -Gun -FBI ($24) 631 000 000 389 12 52 99 King County -Crime Victims TOTAL NON -REVENUES TOTAL NON -REVENUE TRUST FUND PAGE 11 Y.T.D. % OF REMAINING RECEIPTS ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPECTATION .00 7,500.00 .00 .00 71500.00- .00 5,000.00 .00 .00 51000.00- .00 5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00- .00 7,500.00 .00 .00 7,500.00- .00 5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00- .00 5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00- .00 10,000.00 .00 .00 10,000.00- 2,220.00 2,220.00 .00 .00 2,220.00- 81.00 855.00 .00 .00 855.00- 555.40 4,041.07 .00 .00 4,041.07- 2,762.40 22,791.71 .00 .00 22,791.71- 1,565.98 12,622.10 .00 .00 12,622.10- 171.66 1,527.98 .00 .00 1,527.98- 395.67 2,069.65 .00 .00 2,069.65- .00 245.11 .00 .00 245.11- 77.82 184.00 .00 .00 184.00- 36.00 243.00 .00 .00 243.00- 24.00 144.00 .00 .00 144.00- 110.94 911.23 .00 .00 911.23- 8,000.87 92,854.85 .00 .00 92,854.85- 8,000.87 92,854.85 .00 .00 92,854.85- '.CCOUNT NUMBER 631 000 000 589 12 52 01 631000 000 589 12 52 03 631 000 000 589 12 52 06 631 000 000 589 12 52 07 631 000 000 589 12 5208 631 000 000 589 12 52 09 631 000 000 589 12 52 10 631 000 000 589 12 52 88 631 000 000 589 12 52 89 631 000 000 589 12 52 99 City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT o M.T.D. Y.T.D. DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED NON -REVENUE TRUST FUND NON -EXPENDITURES WA ST-Bldg Code Fee WA St-JIS WA St -State Portion WA St -State 30• WA St -Trauma Care WA St-Lab-Bld/Breath WA ST-Litter Control Dept of Lie -Gun Permit-$18/21 WA St Patrol -Gun -FBI ($24) King County -Crime Victims TOTAL NON -EXPENDITURES PAGE 24 4 OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 588.38 1,137.38 .00 .00 1,137.38- 1,003.12 3,485.67 .00 .00 3,485.67- 5,571.28 20,029.31 .00 .00 20,029.31- 3,149.16 11,056.12 .00 .00 11,056.12- .00 992.94 .00 .00 992,94- 482.41 1,673.98 .00 .00 1,673.98- .00 245.11 .00 .00 245.11- .00 207.00 .00 .00 207.00- .00 120.00.. .00 .00 120.00- 217.46 800.29 .00 .00 800.29- 11,011.61 39,747.80 .00 .00 39,747.80- City of Medina Claims Che& Rester October 31, 2006 PAGE 1 Ct---kA=OMt. VENDOR DATE DATE DISTRSHUTION ler NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 71708 66.20 11100 PETTY CASH 10/02/06 00/00/00 OCT'06 001 000 000 516 10 31 00 19.57 REPLENISH PETTY CASH OCT106 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 25.50 REPLENISH PETTY CASH OCT'06 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 16.25 REPLENISH PETTY CASH OCT106 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 4.88 REPLENISH PETTY CASH INVOICE TOTAL 66.20 71709 10,650.40 725 AUSTIN, LINDA M. 10/03/06 00/00/00 AUG'06 001 000 000 558 60 41 06 10,650.40 BUILDING INSPECTOR INVOICE TOTAL 10,650.40 72710 214.00 1990 BELLEVUE SCHOOL DISTRICT 10/03/06 00/00/00 OCTOBER 7, 2006 001 000 000 525 60 41 00 214.00 FACILITY & SITE FEE INVOICE TOTAL 214.00 71711 12.10 351 ACCURINT 10/17/06 00/00/00 1011660-20060831 001 000 000 521 20 41 00 12.10 PEOPLE SEARCHES INVOICE TOTAL 12.10 71712 92.57 825 AUTOGRAPHICS 10/17/06 00/00/00 73546 001 000 000 521 20 48 10 92.57 DIGITAL PRINT INVOICE TOTAL 92.57 71713 100.00 501 ANC 10/17/06 00/00/00 10/10/06 CLASS 001 000 000 514 10 43 00 100.00 BURDUE, JAN INVOICE TOTAL 100.00 71714 5,950.00 1415 BAKER, ROBIN THOMAS 10/17/06 00/00/00 JAN09-AUG25'06 001 000 000 558 60 41 02 5,950.00 HEARING EXAMINER INVOICE TOTAL 5,950.00 71715 2,416.48 18147 BANK OF AMERICA 10/17/06 00/00/00 SEP'06-BARER 001 000 000 518 10 43 00 65.03 XEROX/FOOD SEP'06-BAKER 001 000 000 518 10 31 00 201.19 XEROX/FOOD INVOICE TOTAL 266.22 SEP'06-BURDUE 001 000 000 518 10 31 00 56.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 56.63 SEP'06-CHEN 001 000 000 521 20 49 00 151.58 TRAVEL/DIRECTORY SEP106-CHEN 001 000 000 521 20 43 00 263.40 TRAVEL/DIRECTORY INVOICE TOTAL 414.98 SEP'06-GELLINGS 001 000 000 558 60 31 00 15.24 CALENDAR Cbeck Amount VENDOR v NUMBER VENDOR NAME 71716 144.18 9870 BECKLEY, BRIANA LEE City ofMedina Claims Check Register October 31, 2006 DATE DATE ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER INVOICE TOTAL SEP'06-SCHULZE 001 000 000 513 10 43 00 SEP'06-SCHULZE SEP'06-SCHULZE 001 000 000 513 10 49 00 SEP'06-SCHULZE INVOICE TOTAL SEP'06-WILLIS 001 000 000 576 80 22 00 BATTERY/BOOTS SEP-06-WILLIS 101 000 000 542 30 35 00 BATTERY/BOOTS INVOICE TOTAL 10/17/06 00/00/00 9/13/06 MILEAGE 001 000 000 521 20 43 00 NWPAC MEETING INVOICE TOTAL 71717 561.17 1500 BELLEVUE CITY TREASURER - UTIL 10/17/06 00/00/00 2886897 001 000 000 518 10 47 00 WATER INVOICE TOTAL 71718 287.67 2300 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS 6 BOUIPMEN 10/17/06 00/00/00 517356-04 001 000 000 521 20 22 00 POLICE-GIRIAS 71719 1,959.49 18322 BRAT WEAR 71720 214.11 2660 CIT 71721 1,793.38 18262 COLUMBIA CASCADE COMPANY INVOICE TOTAL 517356-82 001 000 000 521 20 22 00 POLICE-GIRIAS INVOICE TOTAL 534302 001 000 000 521 20 22 00 POLICE-KNOTT INVOICE TOTAL 10/17/06 00/00/00 307455 001 000 000 521 20 22 00 POLICE UNIFORMS INVOICE TOTAL 10/17/06 00/00/00 8121288 001 000 000 521 20 45 00 POLICE COPIER LEASE INVOICE TOTAL 10/17/06 00/00/00 41692-68 001 000 000 576 80 63 00 GAME TABLE INVOICE TOTAL 71722 39.53 3385 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS-POL 10/17/06 00/00/00 0906-POL 001 000 000 521 20 31 00 WATER INVOICE TOTAL 71723 118.71 18143 EASTSIDE EXTERMINATORS 10/17/06 00/00/00 2006-011941 001 000 000 518 30 48 00 ELIMINATE INSECTS PAGE 2 DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT 15.24 1,208.42 10.87 1,219.29 365.85 78.27 444.12 144.18 144.18 561.17 561.17 924.80 924.80 912.83- 912.83- 275.70 275.70 1,959.49 1,959.49 214.11 214.11 1,793.38 1,793.38 39.53 39.53 118.71 Check v 1r 71724 71725 71726 City orMedina C,IW=s Check Register October 31, 2006 Amount VENDOR DATE DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER INVOICE TOTAL 589.26 3890 EASTSIDE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNI 10/17/06 00/00/00 3872 001 000 000 521 20 51 20 RADIO ACCESS FEES INVOICE TOTAL 85.82 4640 ENA COURIERS INC 10/17/06 00/00/00 187947 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 POLICE COURIER SERVICE INVOICE TOTAL 895.00 18092 ENVIRONMENT CONTROL 10/17/06 00/00/00 571789 001 000 000 518 30 48 00 MAINTENANCE INVOICE TOTAL 71727 2,735.43 5150 EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC, INC. 10/17/06 00/00/00 045377 101 000 000 542 40 41 00 DISPOSAL INVOICE TOTAL 71728 743.04 18314 FEDERAL ARMY & NAVY SURPLUS, I 10/17/06 00/00/00 6823 001 000 000 525 60 31 00 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 71729 239.57 5276 FINNIGAN, KRIS 10/17/06 00/00/00 AUG106 001 000 000 525 60 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 71730 4,217.50 5275 FINNIGAN, KRISTEN 10/17/06 00/00/00 SEP'06 001 000 000 525 60 41 00 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INVOICE TOTAL 71731 103.87 11400 FORD OF BELLEVUE 10/17/06 00/00/00 FOCS277120 001 000 000 521 20 48 10 POLICE AUTO 6 INVOICE TOTAL 71732 253.32 5701 GALLS INCORPORATED 10/17/06 00/00/00 5850630900010 001 000 000 521 20 31 40 POLICE GLOVES INVOICE TOTAL 71733 642.29 5875 GRAINGER _ 10/17/06 00/00/00 9184214253 101 000 000 542 30 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 9184214261 101 000 000 542 30 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 9188215140 101 000 000 542 30 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 9188215157 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 SUPPLIES PAGE 3 DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT 118.71 589.26 589.26 85.82 85.82 895.00 895.00 2,735.43 2,735.43 743.04 743.04 239.57 239.57 4,217.50 4,217.50 103.87 103.87 253.32 253.32 224.67 224.67 135.13 135.13 130.61 130.61 55.96 ,(feel( N er 71734 71735 71736 City of Medina CIUMS Check ReWeter October 31, 2 DOO Amount VENDOR DATE DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER INVOICE TOTAL 9189220867 001 000 000 518 30 48 00 REPAIRS INVOICE TOTAL 40.09 7160 INT'L ASSOC FOR PROPERTY 8 EVI 10/17/06 00/00/00 BOOK 001 000 000 521 20 31 00 PROPERTY EVIDENCE INVOICE TOTAL 300.46 18323 JONSSON, LARS 6 LAURIE 10/17/06 00/00/00 REFUND 001 000 000 322 10 00 00 PERMIT FEES INVOICE TOTAL 479.19 8210 KC FINANCE -JAIL SERVICES 10/17/06 00/00/00 1420998 001 000 000 521 20 51 50 MISDEMEANOR INVOICE TOTAL 11737 11,360.50 8625 KIRKLAND MUNICIPAL COURT 10/17/06 00/00/00 AM06MED 001 000 000 512 50 51 10 FILING FEES INVOICE TOTAL JUL06MED 001 000 000 512 50 51 10 FILING FEES INVOICE TOTAL 71738 388.12 8752 KIRKLAND, CITY OF 10/17/06 00/00/00 JUL-AUG'06 001 000 000 521 20 51 80 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INVOICE TOTAL 71739 154.25 9070 LONE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT 10/17/06 00/00/00 SEP-06 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 71740 212.39 18099 MICHAEL'S DRY CLEANING 10/17/06 00/00/00 JUL-AUG'06 001 000 000 521 20 22 00 POLICE UNIFORMS INVOICE TOTAL 71741 7,593.45 10700 OTAK 10/17/06 00/00/00 AUGS-SEP8106AA 001 000 000 558 60 41 50 LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT INVOICE TOTAL AUGS-SEPS'06AB 001 000 000 558 60 41 01 PLANNING CONSULTANT INVOICE TOTAL 71742 36.65 11015 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 10/17/06 00/00/00 907191 001 000 000 521 20 48 00 RS507-POLICE COPIER INVOICE TOTAL 71743 680.10 11020 PACIFIC TOPSOILS, INC. 10/17/06 00/00/00 149112 001 000 000 576 80 41 04 TOPSOILS PAGE 4 DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT 55.96 95.92 95.92 40.09 40.09 300.46 300.46 479.19 479.19 4,668.00 4,668.00 6,692.50 6,692.50 388.12 388.12 154.25 154.25 212.39 212.39 5,778.70 5,778.70 1,814.75 1,814.75 36.65 36.65 57.55 ICheck Amomt VENDOR City of Medina Claims Check Register October 31, 2006 DATE DATE v M NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER 71744 71745 71746 71747 71748 71749 INVOICE TOTAL 149113 101 000 000 54230 31 00 TOPSOILS INVOICE TOTAL 149622 001 000 000 576 80 31.00 TOPSOILS INVOICE TOTAL 149997 101000 000 542 30 31 00 TOPSOILS INVOICE TOTAL 150104 101 000 000 542 30 31 00 TOPSOILS INVOICE TOTAL 151276 001 000 000 576 80 41 04 TOPSOILS INVOICE TOTAL 151896 001 000 000 576 80 41 04 TOPSOILS INVOICE TOTAL 151897 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 TOPSOILS INVOICE TOTAL 19.95 11354 POSITIVE ID INC 10/17/06 00/00/00 7642 001 000 000 525 60 31 00 ID CARDS INVOICE TOTAL 1,577.22 11700 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 10/17/06 00/00/00 SEP106AA 101 000 000 542 63 41 00 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL 86.50 11824 QUALITY TOWING INC 10/17/06 00/00/00 61532 001 000000 521 20 48 10 POLICE AUTO 11 INVOICE TOTAL 28,509.74 12005 ROTA HILL ENGINEERING PARTNERS 10/17/06 00/00/00 AUG'06 001 000 000 558 60 41 07 ENGINEERING CONSULTANT INVOICE TOTAL 1,273.54 12660 SOS DATA SERVICES INC 10/17/06 00/00/00 20260 001 000 000 518 10 49 30 NEWSLETTER INVOICE TOTAL 512.72 13520 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 10/17/06 00/00/00 3074150360 001 000 000 521 20 31 00 SUPPLIES PAGE 5 DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT 57.55 94.52 94.52 74.48 74.48 80.47 80.47 80.47 80.47 84.59 94.59 69.92 69.92 138.10 138.10 19.95 19.95 1,577.22 1,577.22 86.50 86.50 28,509.74 28,509.74 1,273.54 1,273.54 85.20 chr& v _lr 71750 City of Medins Claims Check R,eost,er October 31, 2006 Amoimt VENDOR DATE DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER INVOICE TOTAL 3074150361 001 000 000 518 10 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 3074150362 001 000 000 518 10 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 3074150363 001 000 000 518 10 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 519.05 13575 SYLVIA'S SWIMWEAR 10/17/06 00/00/00 29609 001 000 000 574 20 22 00 LIFEGUARD SUITS INVOICE TOTAL 71751 225.00 15156 UNIVERSITY COMMUNICATIONS 10/17/06 00/00/00 14937 001 000 000 513 10 49 00 XMIH MESSAGES INVOICE TOTAL 71752 351.00 15347 VERIZON NORTHWEST INC 10/17/06 00/00/00 AUG25-SEP25'06 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 POLICE DSl INVOICE TOTAL 71753 84.07 16156 WA ST DEPT OF INFORMATION 10/17/06 00/00/00 2006080204 001 000 000 518 90 48 00 SOFTWARE INVOICE TOTAL 71754 149.33 16151 WASHING MACHINE, INC. 10/17/06 00/00/00 10005 001 000 000 521 20 32 00 POLICE AUTOS INVOICE TOTAL 71755 68.00 16163 WELLS MEDINA NURSERY,INC 10/17/06 00/00/00 31751 001 000 000 576 80 3100 PLANTS INVOICE TOTAL 71756 1,615.00 350 ACCOUNT/ACCUPC 10/18/06 00/00/00 2404 001 000 000 518 90 41 50 COMPUTER SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL 2410 001 000 000 518 90 41 50 COMPUTER SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL 71757 225.54 1500 BELLEVUE CITY TREASURER - UTIL 10/18/06 00/00/00 2907615 001 000 000 576 80 47 00 WATER INVOICE TOTAL 71758 367.91 2300 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS 8 EQUIPMEN 10/18/06 00/00/00 538404-01 001 000 000 521 20 22 00 POLICE -RING PAGE 6 DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT 85.20 107.23 107.23 161.81 161.81 158.48 158.48 519.05 519.05 225.00 225.00 351.00 351.00 84.07 84.07 149.33 149.33 68.00 68.00 1,520.00 1,520.00 95.00 95.00 225.54 225.54 133.77 �beek it r 71759 Amount VENDOR City ofMedins Clsime Check Reteter October 31, 2000 DATE DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER INVOICE TOTAL 540589 001 000 000 521 20 31 40 POLICE -CODE BOOKS INVOICE TOTAL 175.00 2896 CHARLES FLICKINGER BACKFLOW TE 10/18/06 00/00/00 5422 001 000 000 576 80 41 00 BACKFLOW INVOICE TOTAL 71760 2,373.62 18110 CHEVRON (POLICE) 10/18/06 00/00/00 7898306381609 001 000 000 521 20 32 00 POLICE AUTOS INVOICE TOTAL 71761 391.82 3100 CHEVRON (PW STREETS) 10/18/06 00/00/00 7898306407609 001 000 000 576 80 32 00 PW AUTOS INVOICE TOTAL 71762 360.05 18123 CINGULAR WIRELESS 10/18/06 00/00/00 AUG9-SEPS'06 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 CELLULAR PHONE INVOICE TOTAL 71763 426.22 2660 CIT 10/18/06 00/00/00 8221405 001 000 000 521 20 45 00 POLICE COPIER LEASE INVOICE TOTAL 71764 120.00 18325 CITY OF MEDINA 10/18/06 00/00/00 MEDINA PARK 001 000 000 511 60 49 00 SIGNATURE BENCH TILE INVOICE TOTAL 71765 457.36 18324 CLARK'S NATIVE TREES & SHRUBS 10/18/06 00/00/00 8982 001 000 000 576 80 41 04 TREES INVOICE TOTAL 71766 95.71 3308 COMPUSA-HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTION 10/18/06 00/00/00 SEP'06 001 000 000 516 90 48 00 COMPUTER SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 71767 75.48 18275 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS -ADM 10/18/06 00/00/00 0806-ADMINA 001 000 000 518 10 31 00 WATER INVOICE TOTAL 0906-ADMIN 001 000 000 518 10 31 00 WATER INVOICE TOTAL 71768 39.53 3385 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS-POL 10/18/06 00/00/00 0806-POLA 001 000 000 521 20 31 00 WATER INVOICE TOTAL 71769 104.48 18274 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS-PW 10/18/06 00/00/00 0806PWA 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 WATER PAGE 7 DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT 133.77 234.14 234.14 175.00 175.00 2,373.62 2,373.62 391.82 391.82 360.05 360.05 428.22 428.22 120.00 120.00 457.38 457.38 95.71 95.71 37.74 37.74 37.74 37.74 39.53 39.53 60.23 City of Medina Ciaimb, Check Register October. 31, 2006 PAGE 8 Cheek Amount VENDOR DATE DATE DISTRIBUTION NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT INVOICE TOTAL 60.23 0906PW 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 44.25 WATER INVOICE TOTAL 44.25 71770 65.00 18063 DATA BASE SECURE RECORDS DESTR 10/18/06 00/00/00 10392 001 000 000 518 10 41 00 65.00 RECORDS DESTRUCTION INVOICE TOTAL 65.00 71771 1,304.00 3708 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 10/18/06 00/00/00 30985 100 000 000 521 50 64 00 1,304.00 NICAD BATTERY INVOICE TOTAL 1,304.00 71772 8,006.49 3886 EARTH CORPS 10/18/06 00/00/00 IS13 001 000 000 576 80 41 00 3,863.39 FAIRWEATHER INVOICE TOTAL 3,863.39 1527 001 000 000 576 80 41 00 4,143.10 FAIRWEATHER INVOICE TOTAL 4,143.10 71773 589.26 3890 EASTSIDE PUBLIC SAFETY COMKUNI 10/16/06 00/00/00 3918 001 000 000 521 20 51 20 589.26 RADIO ACCESS FEES INVOICE TOTAL 589.26 71774 73.56 4640 ENA COURIERS INC 10/18/06 00/00/00 188410 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 73.56 POLICE COURIER SERVICE INVOICE TOTAL 73.56 71775 1,069.77 18092 ENVIRONMENT CONTROL 10/18/06 00/00/00 4102829 001 000 000 518 30 48 00 174.77 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 174.77 575079 001 000 000 SIB 30 48 00 895.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL 895.00 71776 156.71 5149 EVERETT STEEL COMPANIES 10/18/06 00/00/00 339758 101 000 000 542 30 31 00 156.71 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 156.71 71777 2,021.26 5150 EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC, INC. 10/18/06 00/00/00 045960 001 000 000 518 10 47 00 2,021,26 STORM LINES INVOICE TOTAL 2,021.26 71778 148.84 8750 FEDER KINRO'S 10/18/06 00/00/00 AUG'06 001 000 000 518 10 49 40 148.84 COPIES INVOICE TOTAL 148.84 71779 36.93 18208 GLOBALSTAR USA 10/18/06 00/00/00 10024395 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 36.93 POLICE PHONE SYSTEM 71780 71781 71762 71783 71784 75 71786 71787 71798 71789 AumKmt VENDOR City of Medina Claims Check Zlepster October 31, 2006 DATE DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER INVOICE TOTAL 102,51 5850 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 10/18/06 00/00/00 140471 001 000 000 521 20 48 10 POLICE AUTO 11 INVOICE TOTAL 384.18 5875 GRAINGER 10/18/06 00/00/00 9188699376 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 9195546354 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 9196059431 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 399.00 6110 HEALTHFORCE BILLING DEPT 10/18/06 00/00/00 247-29 001 000 000 521 20 41 50 KING, MATTHEN INVOICE TOTAL 436.42 6330 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 10/18/06 00/00/00 SEP'06 101 000 000 542 30 31 00 SUPPLIES SEP'06 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 35.95 6340 HOMEGUARD SECURITY SERVICES 10/18/06 00/00/00 JF1352 001 000 000 521 20 41 00 MONITORING SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL 234.41 6345 HORIZON 10/18/06 00/00/00 6757646-0 001 000 000 576 80 31 01 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 195.00 18252 ISSAQUAH, CITY OF 10/18/06 00/00/00 04-50005400 001 000 000 521 20 51 50 JAIL SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL 3,610.83 8210 KC FINANCE -JAIL SERVICES 10/18/06 00/00/00 1424133 001 000 000 521 20 51 50 MISDEMEANOR MAIN INVOICE TOTAL 76.82 8110 KC RECORDS AND ELECTION 10/18/06 00/00/00 1421965 001 000 000 511 80 51 00 VOTERS GEN'L ELECTION INVOICE TOTAL 71.11 18287 KESSELRING GUN SHOP INC 10/18/06 00/00/00 8079 DO1 000 000 521 20 35 20 FIREARMS REPAIR INVOICE TOTAL PAGE 9 DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT 36.93 102.51 102.51 59.84 59.84 23.07 23.07 301.27 301.27 399.00 399.00 96.45 339.97 436.42 35.95 35.95 234.41 234.41 195.00 195.00 3,610.83 3,610.83 76.82 76.82 71.11 71.11 City of Medina Clam Check Bocoeter w� 31, 2006 PAGE 10 C eek Amount VENDOR DATE DATE DISTRIBUTION V' er NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 71790 30,394.26 8752 KIRKLAND, CITY OF 10/18/06 00/00/00 3RD OTR'06 001 000 000 521 20 51 10 16,510.76 DISPATCH SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL 16,510.76 MPD1006061 001 000 000 521 20 51 85 12,883.50 IT SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL 12,883.50 MPD1006062 001.000 000 521 20 5185 1,000.00 YRLY ROUTINE LABOR INVOICE TOTAL 1,000.00 71791 69.00 8756 LL BEAN, INC. 10/18/06 00/00/00 OE116553 101 000 000 542 30 22 00 69.00 JACKET INVOICE TOTAL 69.00 71792 300.00 9079 MARRA PHD, HERBERT A. 10/18/06 00/00/00 9/25/06 001 000 000 521 20 41 50 300.00 KING EVALUATION INVOICE TOTAL 300.00 71793 4,000.00 18269 MOBERLY & ROBERTS, P.L.L.0 10/18/06 00/00/00 14 001 000 000 512 50 41 10 4,000.00 PROSECUTION SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL 4,000.00 71794 7,160.98 10700 OTAK 10/18/06 00/00/00 090657917 307 000 000 595 30 63 03 7,160.98 MEDINA BEACH PARK INVOICE TOTAL 7,160.98 71795 48.70 10755 OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL 10/18/06 00/00/00 MASTERS 001 000 000 521 20 41 00 48.70 LABORATORY INVOICE TOTAL 48.70 36 143.75 11015 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 10/18/06 00/00/00 912295 001 000 000 518 10 48 00 143.75 DJ305-ADMIN COPIER INVOICE TOTAL 143.75 71797 331.53 18154 PITNEY BONES PURCHASE POWER 10/18/06 00/00/00 OCT-06 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 331.53 POSTAGE INVOICE TOTAL 331.53 71798 20.15 11354 POSITIVE ID INC 10/18/06 00/00/00 7707 001 000 000 525 60 31 00 20.15 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 20.15 71799 1,160.00 11427 PRICE, JOHN G. 10/18/06 00/00/00 76 001 000 000 512 50 41 20 1,160.00 PUBLIC DEFENDER INVOICE TOTAL 1,160.00 71800 745.86 11700 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 10/18/06 00/00/00 OCT-06AB 101 000 000 542 63 41 00 20.04 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL 20.04 Cbeek Aenoumt VENDOR City of Medins Claims Check Reoster October :31, 2006 DATE DATE N er NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER OCT'06AC 001 000 000 518 10 47 00 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL OCT106AD 001 000 000 576 80 47 00 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL 71801 516.17 11820 QWEST 10/18/06 00/00/00 SEP-06ADMIN 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 425-454-3885 INVOICE TOTAL SEP106POL 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 CIRCUIT INFORMATION INVOICE TOTAL SEP106PW 001 000 000 576 80 42 00 PW FAX MACHINE INVOICE TOTAL 71802 450.00 18319 RAINIER COMMUNICATIONS CONSULT 10/18/06 00/00/00 SEP'06 001 000 000 525 60 41 01 CERT INSTRUCTOR INVOICE TOTAL 71803 8,871.43 12501 ROHRBACH, G. ROBERT 10/18/06 00/00/00 SEP106 001 000,000 558 60 41 05 BUILDING OFFICIAL INVOICE TOTAL 71804 250.00 12685 SCHULZE, DOUGLAS J 10/18/06 00/00/00 OCT106 001 000 000 513 10 49 01 AUTO ALLOWANCE INVOICE TOTAL 5 590.88 13350 SEATTLE TIMES, THE 10/18/06 00/00/00 J724583503 001 000 000 576 80 49 00 RECRUITMENT AD INVOICE TOTAL 71806 10.23 13400 SECURITY SAFE 4 LOCK INC 10/18/06 00/00/00 330162 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 KEYS INVOICE TOTAL 330300 001 000 000 521 20 41 00 KEYS INVOICE TOTAL 71807 290.00 13404 SHURGARD OF BELLEVUE 10/18/06 00/00/00 UNIT 1121-NOV'06 001 000 000 518 30 45 00 STORAGE INVOICE TOTAL UNIT 1178-NOV'06 001 000 000 518 30 45 00 STORAGE INVOICE TOTAL PAGE 11 DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT 551.44 551.44 174.36 174.38 278.71 278.71 192.55 192.55 44.91 44.91 450.00 450.00 8,871.43 8,871.43 250.00 250.00 590.88 590.88 7.67 7.67 2.56 2.56 149.00 149.00 141.00 141.00 Cbeek N per "doe 71809 71810 71811 71812 71813 71814 71815 '.6 71817 71818 71819 City of Medina Claims Check Register OeWbe 31, "06 PAGE 12 Amount VENDOR DATE DATE DISTRIBUTION NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 30.00 13380 SIDNEY E RUBIN & ASSOCIATES 10/18/06 00/00/00 KING, MATTHEW 001 000 000 521 20 41 50 30.00 INVESTIGATIVE INVOICE TOTAL 30.00 504.45 18249 SIMLAB.NET 10/18/06 00/00/00 OCT'06 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 504.45 T-1 DATA LINE INVOICE TOTAL 504.45 159.83 18255 SIMLAB.NET 10/18/06 00/00/00 OCT'06 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 159.83 T-1 DATA LINE INVOICE TOTAL 159.83 49.57 18157 SPRINT - CITY OF INDUSTRY 10/18/06 00/00/00 AUG24-SEP23'06 001 000 000 558 60 42 00 49.57 CELLULAR PHONE INVOICE TOTAL 49.57 469.61 18193 TEL WEST COMMUNICATIONS 10/18/06 00/00/00 695330 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 469.61 TELEPHONES INVOICE TOTAL 469.61 60.95 15203 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION 10/18/06 00/00/00 6089441 101 000 000 542 30 47 00 60.95 EXCAVATION NOTIFICATION INVOICE TOTAL 60.95 188.00 18326 WA RECREATION & PARKS ASSOCIAT 10/18/06 00/00/00 2006 DUES 001 000000 521 20 49 40 188.00 AQUATICS INVOICE TOTAL 198.00 39.17 16151 WASHING MACHINE, INC. 10/16/06 00/00/00 10006 001 000 000 521 20 32 00 39.17 POLICE AUTOS INVOICE TOTAL 39.17 930.00 18230 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL 10/18/06 00/00/00 00029190 001 000 000 521 20 51.30 930.00 ACCESS USER FEE INVOICE TOTAL 930.00 400.00 18146 WEDLUND, CAROLL 10/18/06 00/00/00 OCT'06 001 000 000 521 20 41 00 400.00 CIVIL SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL 400.00 250.00 18197 WILLIS, JOE 10/18/06 00/00/00 OCT'06 001 000 000 576 80 43 00 250.00 AUTO ALLOWANCE INVOICE TOTAL 250.00 99.94 9326 WTI, LLC 10/18/06 00/00/00 OCT'06 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 59.30 FAX MACHINE INVOICE TOTAL 59.30 SEP106 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 40.64 FAX MACHINE INVOICE TOTAL 40.64 Cj-- 'ek N !er 71820 71821 71822 71823 City ofMedins Claims Check Rester October 31, 2006 PAGE 13 Amouut VENDOR DATE DATE DISTRIBUTION NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 1,967.22 18035 YAKIMA COUNTY DEPT OF CORRECTI 10/18/06 00/00/00 AUG'06-HOUSING 001 000 000 521 20 51 50 1,382.38 TWO INMATES INVOICE TOTAL 1,382.38 AUG'06-MEDICAL 001 000 000 521 20 51 50 135.58 TWO INMATES INVOICE TOTAL 135.58 SEP'06-HOUSING 001 000 000 521 20 51 50 409.13 ONE INMATE INVOICE TOTAL 409.13 SEP'06-MEDICAL 001 000 000 521 20 51 50 40.13 ONE INMATE INVOICE TOTAL 40.13 42.25 18308 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO. 10/18/06 00/00/00 68902657 001 000 000 521 20 31 00 42.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 42.25 217.46 8010 KC FINANCE -CRIME VICTIMS 10/23/06 00/00/00 3RD QTR'O6 631 000 000 589 12 52 99 217.46 CRIME VICTIMS INVOICE TOTAL 217.46 10,794.35 13515 WA ST TREASURER'S OFFICE 10/23/06 00/00/00 3RD OTR-06 631 000 000 589 12 52 01 225.00 STATE FEES 3RD QTR'O6 631 000 000 589 12 52 03 1,003.12 STATE FEES 3RD QTR'O6 631 000 000 589 12 52 06 5,571.28 STATE FEES 3RD QTR106 631 000 000 589 12 52 07 3,149.16 STATE FEES 3RD QTR'06 631 000 000 589 12 52 09 482.41 STATE FEES 3RD QTR'O6 631 000 000 589 12 52 01 363.38 STATE FEES INVOICE TOTAL 10,794.35 71824 290,986.50 1750 BELLEVUE, CITY OF 10/30/06 00/00/00 11992 001 000 000 522 20 51 00 10,376.00 LEOFF I-MEDINA INVOICE TOTAL 10,376.00 11998 001 000 000 522 20 51 00 280,610.50 FIRE PROTECTION INVOICE TOTAL 280,610.50 71625 104.13 2595 BURDUE, JAN 10/30/06 00/00/00 2006 HARRIS COUP 001 000 000 514 10 43 00 89.89 MILEAGE INVOICE TOTAL 89.89 2006 WCIA MTG 001 000 000 51410 43 00 14.24 10/20/06 MILEAGE Check v -r 71826 71827 71828 71829 71830 71831 71832 71833 71834 City ofMedina Claims Check RcOstm October 31 f 2000 PAGE 14 Amalitt' VENDOR DATE DATE DISTRIBUTION NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT INVOICE TOTAL 14.24 411.94 2655 CADMAN INC 10/30/06 00/00/00 2386797 101 000 000 542 30 41 00 411.94 ROCK INVOICE TOTAL 411.94 862.46 3100 CHEVRON (PW STREETS) 10/30/06 00/00/00 7898306407610 001 000 000 576 80 32 00 862.46 PW AUTOS INVOICE TOTAL 862.46 358.25 18123 CINGULAR WIRELESS 10/30/06 00/00/00 SEP9-OCT8'06 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 358.25 CELLULAR PHONE INVOICE TOTAL 358.25 65.00 18063 DATA BASE SECURE RECORDS DESTR 10/30/06 00/00/00 11419 001 000 000 518 10 41 00 65.00 RECORD DESTRUCTION INVOICE TOTAL 65.00 73.56 4640 ENA COURIERS INC 10/30/06 00/00/00 188867 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 73.56 POLICE COURIER SERVICE INVOICE TOTAL 73.56 162.60 5270 FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INT'L IN 10/30/06 00/00/00 7850 001 000 000 521 20 48 00 162.60 TAHOE REPAIR INVOICE TOTAL 162.60 516.23 5300 FIRE CHIEF EQUIPMENT 10/30/06 00/00/00 0243410 001 000 000 521 20 48 00 301.28 INSPECT FIRE EXTINGUISH INVOICE TOTAL 301.28 0243546 001 000 000 518 30 48 00 68.79 INSPECT FIRE EXTINGUISH INVOICE TOTAL 68.79 0244073 101 000 000 542 30 48 00 146.16 INSPECT FIRE EXTINGUISH INVOICE TOTAL 146.16 379.39 5410 FISCHER, CRAIG T 10/30/06 00/00/00 10/10/06 MILEAGE 001 000 000 518 10 43 00 379.39 LASERFICHE INVOICE TOTAL 379.39 206.60 11400 FORD OF BELLEVUE 10/30/06 00/00/00 FOCS280112 001 000 000 521 20 48 10 171.07 POLICE AUTO 9 INVOICE TOTAL 171,07 FOCS280244 001 000 000 521 20 48 10 35.53 POLICE AUTO 6 INVOICE TOTAL 35.53 71835 10,502.10 5450 FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN 10/30/06 00/00/00 839505 001 000 000 515 20 41 60 10,502.10 AUG1-SEP26'06 City ormedina Clams Cheek Re�i¢' ster October 31, 2006 PAGE 15 .ck ABlotMt, VENDOR DATE DATE DISTRIBUTION NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO.. ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 1 r INVOICE TOTAL 10,502.10 71836 251.47 18248 FOWLER COMPANY, HD 10/30/06 00/00/00 I1975628 101 000 000 542 30 31 00 251.47 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 251.47 71837 50.00 18257 FSH COMMUNICATIONS, LLC 10/30/06 00/00/00 76471 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 50.00 PAYPHONE INVOICE TOTAL 50.00 71838 33.51 5875 GRAINGER 10/30/06 00/00/00 9188731385 101 000 000 542 30 31 00 33.51 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 33.51 71839 2,177.70 18284 HAGEMAN, KEN 10/30/06 00/00/00 SEP'06 001 000 000 558 60 41 05 2,177.70 PLAN REVIEW/INSPECTION INVOICE TOTAL 2,177.70 71840 3,345.00 7155 INTELLIGENT PRODUCTS INC 10/30/06 00/00/00 60876A 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 3,345.00 800 MUTT MITTS INVOICE TOTAL 3,345.00 71841 1,606.30 7600 KC JOURNAL NEWSPAPERS 10/30/06 00/00/00 1432360 001 000 000 518 10 44 00 608.25 ADVERTISING INVOICE TOTAL 608.25 1436438 001 000 000 518 10 44 00 510.05 ADVERTISING INVOICE TOTAL 510.05 1440319 001 000 000 518 10 44 00 488.00 ADVERTISING INVOICE TOTAL 488.00 71842 968.37 18305 KOMPAN UNIQUE PLAYGROUNDS 10/30/06 00/00/00 55495 307 000 000 595 30 03 00 968.37 SUPERNOVA INVOICE TOTAL 968.37 71843 4,000.00 18289 MOBERLY & ROBERTS, P.L.L.0 10/30/06 00/00/00 17 001 000 000 512 50 41 10 4,000.00 PROSECUTION SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL 4,000.00 71844 871.89 10550 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 10/30/06 00/00/00 OCT106 001 000 000 518 10 31 00 503.35 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 503.35 SEP106 001 000 000 518 10 31 00 368.54 SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL 368.54 71845 27,472.00 10555 OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE 10/30/06 00/00/00 652952 001 000 000 515 20 41 10 4,300.91 WAYNE TANAKA chf4* N Dr 71846 City of Medins Claims Check la4wster October 31, 2006 AnlOMt VENDOR DATE DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER INVOICE TOTAL 652963 001 000 000 515 20 41 10 VARIOUS MATTERS INVOICE TOTAL 653655 001 000 000 515 20 41 10 WAYNE TANAKA INVOICE TOTAL 653663 001 000 000 515 20 41 10 VARIOUS MATTERS INVOICE TOTAL 435.20 10556 OIC EQUIPMENT INC 10/30/06 00/00/00 44546 001 000 000 518 30 45 00 PW OFFICE TRAILER INVOICE TOTAL 44582 001 000 000 518 30 45 00 PW OFFICE TRAILER INVOICE TOTAL 71847 7,801.56 10700 OTAK 10/30/06 00/00/00 SEP11-OCT6'06AA 001 000 000 558 60 41 01 PLANNING CONSULTANT INVOICE TOTAL SEP9-OCT6'06AA 001 000 000 558 60 41 50 LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT INVOICE TOTAL 71848 98.37 10750 OVERLAKE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB 10/30/06 00/00/00 8/9/06 CATERING 001 000 000 521 20 43 00 COALITION SMALL CITIES INVOICE TOTAL 71849 578.11 11020 PACIFIC TOPSOILS, INC. 10/30/06 00/00/00 13401 001 000 000 576 80 31 00 TOPSOIL INVOICE TOTAL 71850 82.20 11354 POSITIVE ID INC 10/30/06 00/00/00 7768 001 000 000 521 20 41 00 ID CARDS INVOICE TOTAL 7783 001 000 000 521 20 41 00 ID CARDS INVOICE TOTAL 71851 1,577.22 11700 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 10/30/06 00/00/00 OCT106AA 101 000 000 542 63 41 00 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL 71852 975.12 11824 QUALITY TOWING INC 10/30/06 00/00/00 61864 001 000 000 521 20 49 95 1998 INT'L TRUCK PAGE 16 DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT 4,300.91 10,.607.06 10,.607.06 7,213.13 7,213.13 5,350.90 5,350.90 217.60 217.60 217.60 217.60 2,241.75 2,241.75 5,559.81 5,559.81 98.37 98.37 578.11 578.11 41.10 41.10 41.10 41.10 1,577.22 1,577.22 795.60 Cheek Amount VENDOR City of Medina Claims Cheek Reoster October 31, 2006 DATE DATE N er NUMBER VENDOR NAME ISSUED REDEEMED INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER INVOICE TOTAL 61942 001 000 000 521 20 49 95 1998 IN'T 4700 WHT TRK INVOICE TOTAL 71853 325.44 11820 QWEST 10/30/06 00/00/00 OCT'06-ADMIN 001 000 000 518 10 42 00 425-454-3885 INVOICE TOTAL OCT'06-PW 001 000 000 576 80 42 00 PW FAX MACHINE INVOICE TOTAL 71854 270.00 18327 REALVNC LTD 10/30/06 00/00/00 R2344 001 000 000 518 90 48 00 6 SERVER SOFTWARE INVOICE TOTAL 71855 814.50 18271 RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATIONS CORP 10/30/06 00/00/00 JUL20-SEP21'06 001 000 000 515 20 41 60 MEDINA FRANCHISE INVOICE TOTAL 71856 10,103.70 12501 ROHRBACH, G. ROBERT 10/30/06 00/00/00 OCT106 001 000 000 558 60 41 05 BUILDING OFFICIAL INVOICE TOTAL 71857 20,800.06 12005 ROTH HILL ENGINEERING PARTNERS 10/30/06 00/00/00 SEP'06 001 000 000 558 60 41 07 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INVOICE TOTAL 71858 35.65 15203 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION 10/30/06 00/00/00 6099441 101 000 000 542 30 47 00 EXCAVATION NOTIFICATION INVOICE TOTAL 71859 351.00 15347 VERI20N NORTHWEST INC 10/30/06 00/00/00 SEP25-OCT25106 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 POLICE DS1 INVOICE TOTAL 71860 25.00 16120 WA ST EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 10/30/06 00/00/00 2006-2007 001 000 000 519 90 49 09 OASI PROGRAM INVOICE TOTAL 71861 410.23 16165 WEDLUND, CAROLL 10/30/06 00/00/00 SEP'06 EXPENSES 001 000 000 521 20 41 00 CIVIL SERVICE CONF INVOICE TOTAL 71862 79.20 422 XO COMMUNICATION SERVICES-POLI 10/30/06 00/00/00 23854806 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 PROPERTY RM ALARM LINE INVOICE TOTAL 24391048 001 000.000 521 20 42 00 PROPERTY RM ALARM LINE INVOICE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL PAGE 17 DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT 795.60 179.52 179.52 280.62 280.62 44.82 44.82 270.00 270.00 814.50 814.50 10,103.70 10,103.70 20,800.06 20,800.06 35.65 35.65 351.00 351.00 25.00 25.00 410.23 410.23 39.60 39.60 39.60 39.60 577,317.50 ITEM H-1 MEDINA MONTHLY SUMMARY OCTOBER, 2006 FELONY CRIMES Auto Theft (E-lert 06-021) 2006-0003411 10/05/06 2800 block of Evergreen Pt Rd Medina officer responded to a report of a vehicle theft as well as vehicle prowls (Case 2006-0003410). The victim states he had parked and locked his truck at 8:00 p.m. on 10/04/06 and discovered it missing after his girlfriend reported the two vehicle prowls in his driveway. The truck was entered in the state system as stolen. (On 10/09/06, the truck was recovered by Renton Police with the chrome wheels and stereo missing). Fraud (ID Theft) 2006-0003456 10/08/06 800 block of 80t' Ave NE Victims reported they noticed in their bank statement for a business account a couple unauthorized withdrawals were made from New York. The victims contacted the bank and discovered an unknown individual had contacted the bank and changed the mailing address to a New York address. This individual also requested a debit card. Total amount of withdrawals totaled $2,004 from ATMs in New York. The accounts were closed immediately. Theft 2006-0003541 10/18/06 8000 block of NE 16`"(Overtake Golf & Country Club) The victim reported his wallet and his Rolex watch was taken out of an unlocked locker at the Overtake Golf & Country Club on 9/29/06 between 1:00 pm and 5:00 pm. The wallet was later recovered at a golf course in Seattle and was missing $150 cash. The victim had no explanation in reporting the theft nearly three weeks after the incident. The watch was entered in the state system as stolen. Total loss: $12,500. Vehicle Prowl (Theft) 2006-0003675 10/29/06 2500 block of Medina Circle (E-lert 06-023) Medina Police are investigating a vehicle prowl that occurred between 11:30 PM on 10/28/06 and 9:00 AM on 10/29/06. Unknown suspect(s) broke the driver's door window of the vehicle parked in the driveway and removed a canvas bag containing personal items. The approximately loss, including damage is valued at: $675. Medina Police Department Monthly Report — City of Medina October 2006 ITEM H-1 MISDEMEANOR CRIMES Vehicle Prowl (Attempt) 2006-0003402 10/04/06 3300 block of Evergreen Pt Rd (E-lert 06-021) Between the night of October l and morning of October 2, a resident in the 3300 block of Evergreen Point Road was awakened by her barking dogs and found the door lock of her vehicle had been punched causing $300 damage. Nothing was taken. Vehicle Prowl (E-lert 06-021) 2006-0003410 10/05/06 2800 block of Evergreen Pt Rd Between the evening of October 41' and morning of October 5`h, unknown person(s) prowled two unlocked vehicles. While rummaging through the vehicles, nothing else other than a key to a nearby truck was taken. The unknown person(s) used the key to steal the truck (Refer to Case #2006-0003411). Vehicle Prowl (E-lert 06-021) 2006-0003414 10/05/06 2400 block of Evergreen Pt Rd Medina officer responded to a report of a vehicle prowl that occurred between 7:00 p.m. on 10/04/06 and 10:00 a.m. on 10/05/06. Person(s) unknown entered the unlocked vehicle, which was parked in the carport. They removed a tan leather purse from the front passenger seat. Later the purse was located in the bushes further down the street. Contents were spilled out onto the ground, but nothing was missing. Assault 2006-0003577 10/21/06 7700 block of NE 22°d St Medina officer responded to a report of sexual harassment by a co-worker while on a jobsite on 10/19/06 between 7:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. The victim reported there was a pattern of harassment occurring. Further investigation is pending. OTHER Found Property 2006-0003399 10/04/06 501 Evergreen Point Rd (City Hall) Medina officer discovered a Raleigh mountain bike left outside of City Hall. The serial number was run through the state system and it had not been reported stolen. The bike was placed into the property room for safe keeping. Found Property (Drugs) 2006-0003542 10/18/06 3000 block of Evergreen Point Rd The parents turned over a backpack containing narcotics and a digital scale they discovered in their son's room two weeks earlier. Items were confiscated and were destroyed. Harassment (Telephone) 2006-0003607 10/23/06 2200 block of Evergreen Point Rd Medina Police Department Monthly Report — City of Medina 2 October 2006 ITEM H-1 Between 7:00 pm and 7:30 pm on 10/20/06, a teenage girl reported she was receiving several harassing phone calls that were threatening and insulting. She believes she knows the suspect's voice. CALLS FOR SERVICE Warrant Arrests ( 4 ) 2006-0003394 $ Medina DWLS-3rd 2006-0003487 $1,000 Seattle Theft $ 800 Renton Theft 2006-0003617 $2,500 Medina DWLS-3`d 2006-0003682 $ 500 Hunts Point DWLS-3`d Medina Police Department Monthly Report — City of Medina 3 October 2006 ITEM H-1 HUNTS POINT MONTHLY SUMMARY OCTOBER, 2006 FELONY CRIMES Theft 2006-0003468 10/10/06 8400 block of Hunts Point Ln Medina officer responded to a report of a theft at a construction site where an air compressor was taken between 7:00 p.m. on 10/06/06 and 8:00 on 10/09/06. Case 2006- 0003316 is related in that this is the same air compressor that was damaged by a former employee. Several attempts were made to contact the former employee with negative results due to limited information provided by the victim. Total estimated loss: $300. Stolen Property (E-lert #06-021) 2006-0003492 10/12/06 3400 block of Hunts Point Rd A routine traffic stop at 1:40AM on October 6, 2006 led to the arrest of the driver of a vehicle on a number of charges including possession of burglary tools. Medina investigators are attempting to determine if the vehicle driven on this night was an unreported stolen. A Medina Officer stopped the vehicle in the 3400 block of Hunts Point Road after a traffic violation. The driver of the vehicle stated he did not have a valid driver's license. A records check corroborated the driver's admission, however, the reason was due to a suspension for a past felony crime involving a motor vehicle. The driver was then arrested and taken into custody. A search of the impounded vehicle after arrest yielded 12 shaved ignition keys for seven different makes of vehicles. A similar shaved key for a different type of vehicle was in the ignition of the stopped vehicle. A dent puller commonly used to punch car locks and break into locking mail boxes was also found inside the vehicle. The driver admitted the shaved keys in the vehicle "were left over from when I used to steal cars". By all indications, our Medina Officer's early intervention prevented these two individuals from perpetuating any crime in the community. The male driver and female passenger are both five time convicted felons and are on probation with the Washington State Department of Corrections. Their convictions include auto theft, possession of stolen property, and drug violations. Their probation officers will be notified of this contact with our department. The female was also processed and released outside of our jurisdiction pending investigation into the possibility of the unreported stolen vehicle. Malicious Mischief 2006-0003535 10/17/06 4200 block of Hunts Point Rd Medina officer responded to a report of malicious mischief that occurred between 4:00 p.m. on 10/16/06 and 7:00 a.m. on 10/17/06 where unknown person(s) fired pellets at a window of a barge anchored in Lake Washington. The damage is estimated at $500. It is unknown if the perpetrator was on the water or on land. Medina Police Department Monthly Report - City of Medina October 2006 1 ITEM H-1 MISDEMEANOR CRIMES No significant Misdemeanor Crimes occurred during the month of October. OTHER No other significant incidents occurred during the month of October. CALLS FOR SERVICE Warrant Arrests ( 1 ) 2006-0003689 $ 25,000 Felony Seattle Rape of a Child Medina Police Department Monthly Report - City of Medina October 2006 2 MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police Monthly Activity Report City of Medina 2006 H-1 Felony Crimes October YTD YTD Year End 2006 2006 2005 2005 Assault, Aggravated 0 0 0 0 Robbery 0 0 0 0 Sexual Assault/Rape 0 0 0 0 Burglary (inc Attempt) 0 5 18 20 Drug Violations 0 1 3 3 Fraud (ID Theft) 1 16 14 17 Vehicle Prowl 1 9 9 10 Theft (over $250) 1 10 1 1 Malicious Mischief 0 0 2 2 Arson 0 0 0 0 Auto Theft (inc Recovery) 1 5 3 4 Poss Stolen Property 0 3 0 0 TOTAL 4 49 50 57 Misdeameanor October YTD YTD Year End Crimes 2006 2006 2005 2005 Assault, Simple 1 4 2 2 Malicious Mischief 0 6 11 15 Vehicle Prowl 3 15 7 9 Theft (Under $250) 0 7 27 35 Domestic Violence 0 2 0 1 Minor in Possession 0 11 14 14 Drug Violations 3 16 3 3 Total 7 61 64 79 Page 1 ITEM H-1 MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police YEARLY ACTIVITY REPORT City of Medina 2006 Felony Crimes Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total Assault, Aggravated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Robbery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sexual Assault/Rape 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Burglary (inc Attempt; 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 5 Drug Violations 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Fraud (ID Theft) 3 1 3 1 3 2 0 2 0 1 16 Vehicle Prowl 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 3 1 9 Theft (over $250) 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 2 2 1 10 Malicious Mischief 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auto/Boat Theft 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 Poss Stolen Property 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 TOTAL 5 3 6 4 5 4 1 10 7 4 0 0 49 Misdeameanor Crimes Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total Assault, Simple 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 Malicious Mischief 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 Vehicle Prowl 2 2 2 3 0 0 1 0 2 3 15 Theft (Under $250) 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 7 Domestic Violence 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 Minor in Possession 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 4 2 0 11 Drug Violations 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 16 Total 7 7 4 9 5 5 4 6 7 7 0 0 61 Page 2 MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police Monthly Activity Report City of Medina 2006 Traffic October YTD YTD Year End ACCIDENTS 2006 2006 2005 2005 Injury 0 1 0 0 Non -Injury 3 8 10 16 TOTAL 3 9 10 16 Traffic October YTD YTD Year End CITATIONS 2006 2006 2005 2005 Driving Under Influence 9 86 74 84 *Other 6 119 53 58 Total 15 205 127 142 Traffic October YTD YTD Year End INFRACTIONS 2006 2006 2005 2005 Speeding 8 61 94 107 Parking 5 87 34 44 **Other 27 284 345 375 Total 40 432 473 526 October YTD YTD Year End WARNINGS 2006 2006 2005 2005 Total 81 970 1024 1151 October YTD YTD Year End CALLS FOR SERVICE 2006 2006 2005 2005 House Watch 35 418 489 590 False Alarms 18 308 295 360 Assists 45 564 569 657 Suspicious Circumstances 15 153 155 185 Property-Found/Lost 2 17 18 19 Animal Complaints 6 34 42 45 Missing Person 0 3 1 1 Warrant Arrests 4 61 29 39 ***Other 1 23 18 22 Total 126 1581 1616 1918 *DWLS; Fail to Transfer Title; No License **Expired Tabs; No insurance; Fail to stop; Defective Equipment ***Verbal Domestic; Vandalism; Civil Dispute; Disturbance Page 3 MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police YEARLY ACTIVITY REPORT City of Medina 2006 Traffic Accidents Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Injury 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Non -Injury 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 3 8 TOTAL 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 9 Traffic Citations Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Driving Under Influence 8 7 10 12 7 6 8 8 11 9 86 Other 1 5 13 12 17 10 20 21 14 6 119 Total 9 12 23 24 24 16 28 29 25 15 0 0 205 Traffic Infractions Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Speeding 5 7 5 9 10 7 3 2 5 8 61 Parking 3 4 4 11 10 20 15 5 10 5 87 Other 20 29 30 46 42 15 27 26 22 27 284 Total 28 40 39 66 62 42 45 33 37 40 0 0 432 Warnings Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Total 75 97 119 133 116 89 116 63 81 81 970 Calls for Service Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total House Watch 35 64 49 80 37 22 41 33 22 35 418 False Alarms 30 51 36 27 23 25 43 27 28 18 308 Assists 43 52 68 57 64 58 66 54 57 45 564 Suspicious Circumstances 15 16 17 19 9 13 13 15 21 15 153 Property-Found/Lost 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 2 17 Animal Complaints 2 1 6 2 1 2 9 1 4 6 34 Missing Person 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Warrant Arrests 4 1 3 5 14 8 6 6 10 4 61 Other 3 1 4 4 1 0 2 1 6 1 23 Total 135 187 185 197 152 129 182 138 150 126 0 0 1581 Page 4 Town of Hunts Point MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police Monthly Activity Report Town of Hunts Point 2006 Felony Crimes October YTD YTD Year End 2006 2006 2005 2005 Burglary 0 1 5 5 Forgery (Identity Theft) 0 1 2 3 Vehicle Prowl 0 0 1 1 Theft (over $250) 1 2 3 4 Possession Stolen Prop 1 3 2 2 Drug Violation 0 0 1 1 Auto/Boat Theft 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 2 7 15 17 Misdeameanor October YTD YTD Year End Crimes 2006 2006 2005 2005 Assault, Simple 0 1 1 1 Malicious Mischief 1 2 3 3 Vehicle Prowl 0 1 5 5 Theft (Under $250) 0 1 4 5 Domestic Violence 0 1 0 1 Minor in Possession 0 3 7 7 Drug Violations 1 8 2 2 Total 2 17 22 24 Page 5 MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT Town o Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police Hants Point \, Yearly Activity Report Town of Hunts Point 2006 Felony Crimes Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total Burglary 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Forgery (Identity) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Vehicle Prowl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Theft (over $250) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 Poss Stolen Prop 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 Drug Violation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auto/Boat Theft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 7 Misdeameanor Crimes Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total Assault, Simple 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Malicious Mischief 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 Vehicle Prowl 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Theft (Under $250) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Domestic Violence 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Minor in Possession 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Drug Violations 1 0 1 2 1 0 2 0 0 1 8 Total 6 1 1 2 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 17 Page 6 MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT Toren Of Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police HZ hiff Monthly Activity Report Hunts Point 2006 Traffic October YTD YTD Year End CITATIONS 2006 2006 2005 2005 Driving Under Influence 2 25 37 40 Accidents 1 1 1 1 *Other 3 52 15 17 Total 6 78 53 58 Traffic October YTD YTD Year End INFRACTIONS 2006 2006 2005 2005 Speeding 0 2 25 25 Parking 3 19 7 10 **Other 27 273 302 326 Total 30 294 334 361 October YTD YTD Year End WARNINGS 2006 2006 2005 2005 Total 7 90 223 247 October YTD YTD Year End CALLS FOR SERVICE 2006 2006 2005 2005 House Watch 1 34 35 46 False Alarms 4 80 66 82 Assists 4 51 62 69 Suspicious Circumstances 7 32 34 40 Property-Lost/Found 0 4 0 0 Animal Complaints 0 2 6 7 Warrant Arrests 1 11 6 7 ***Other 0 4 4 4 Total 17 218 213 255 *DWLS; Fail to Transfer Title;No License **Expired Tabs; No insurance;Fail to stop;Defective Equipment ***Verbal Domestic; Harassment;Civil Dispute;Trespass Page 7 Traffic Citations Driving Under Influence Accidents Other Total Traffic Infractions Speeding Parking Other Total Warnings Total Calls for Service House Watch False Alarms Assists Suspicious Circumstances Property-Lost/Found Animal Complaints Warrant Arrests Other Total MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT Jeffrey Chen, Chief of Police YEARLY ACTIVITY REPORT HUNTS POINT 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 3 3 3 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 6 8 10 6 3 6 9 9 12 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 4 2 20 22 16 37 35 34 23 23 19 38 39 36 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 2 3 3 2 25 0 0 0 1 1 7 6 6 3 52 9 9 9 6 0 0 78 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 3 19 26 24 32 27 273 27 26 33 30 0 0 294 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 11 6 6 6 10 10 9 11 14 7 90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 5 5 5 4 5 2 2 4 1 1 34 7 12 3 7 11 9 12 6 9 4 80 1 7 5 7 3 4 5 9 6 4 51 3 2 2 3 3 6 3 1 2 7 32 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 1 11 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 18 26 17 25 24 22 23 24 22 17 0 0 218 Page X ITEM H-3 CITY OF MEDINA Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 (425) 233-6410 www.medina-wa.gov MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7, 2006 TO: City Council, City Manager FROM: Joe Willis Sr., Director of Public Works RE: October Public Works Activity Report 1. A preliminary draft report of the condition survey of the existing City Hall was delivered this week by Marc Pevoto of Johnston Architects. The report includes an assessment of the building envelope condition, structural, mechanical, and electrical systems with recommendations for repairs and improvements. Copies of the report will be provided to the Council when cost estimates are completed by the various disciplines that conducted the survey. In general, the building needs exterior waterproofing, siding repairs, framing connectors, additional shear wall construction, and mechanical and electrical system upgrades. The final report and cost estimates will be ready for presentation to the Council just prior to the December budget hearing. 2. NE 8th Street Sidewalk Improvement Project work began on October 301h with pavement saw cutting for the new storm drainage trench prior to the new curb installation along the north side of the roadway. Storm drain work was completed on NE 22"d just east of 77th Avenue NE on November 3rd. Project work has been temporarily suspended during the heavy rains and will resume as soon as the weather cooperates. 3. The Medina Beach Park Shoreline Restoration project will not be starting this year due to permit delays. The meeting with Stewart Reinbold of State Fish & Wildlife, Kitty Nelson of NMFS, Karen Walter of the Muckleshoot Tribe, and Susan Powell of the Corps of Engineers on October 121" while productive, focused on the replacement of the rock bulkhead with an extensive gravel spawning bed (elimination of the riprap shoreline). The consultants with OTAK and I emphasized the need to protect the existing Bellevue sewer main just behind the bulkhead and expressed our reservation with its replacement by a 6:1 sloping gravel frontage. I sent a follow up letter to Susan Powell pointing out that the present condition of the shoreline provides very limited habitat for salmon and requesting that the Corps provide their determination of compensatory mitigation requirements relative to adverse effects of our present shoreline restoration design prior to any undertaking of design revisions. 4. Public Works Crew activity in October included: Testing and initiation of water treatment of the Medina Park ponds, Catch Basin cleaning, Leaf removal and debris cleanup, Street sweeping, Irrigation and water systems winterization, Restroom cleaning and garbage pickup, Construction of the canopy covering for the mobile communications unit. a x X t K �LJ Nub„ ^: ITEM H-5 DRAFT CITY OF MEDINA Park Board Meeting Minutes October 16, 2006 Medina City Hall 7:00 p.m. 501 Evergreen Point Road Call to Order Chair Roger Ngouenet called the October 16, 2006, Park Board meeting to order at 7:08 pm. Roll Call Present: Masayo Arakawa, Steve Bruskern, Gabrielle Dickmann (arrived 7.09 pm), Roger Ngouenet; and Heija Nunn Absent: Steve White and Lisa Fleishmann Staff Present: Joe Willis, Director of Public Works; Pam Greytak, Administrative Assistant Mayor Miles Adam was in attendance. Nunn and Adam discussed the City Council's policy regarding Park Board reports. Minutes MOTION BRUSKERN AND SECOND ARAKAWA TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 18, 2006, PARK BOARD MINUTES AS SUBMITTED, MOTION PASSED 5-0, 7:12 PM. Park Reports Bruskern commented that because of improvements to Medina Park more people are utilizing it's services. Nunn asked about adding a Purell station on the 80th street side of Medina Park. Willis indicated this could be done. Ngouenet said he picked up litter along the SR-520 trail. Other Business 2007 Work Plan and Budget (7:18 pm) Willis reported the 2007 budget included $23,000 for upgrades to Fairweather parking lot, stairway and play area, and $18,000 for gymnasium stairs. He further explained budget did not include Five -Corners upgrades as mentioned in previous meeting. Nunn asked if a decision was made regarding various sign options for the Five - Corners area. Willis responded the issues were discussed previous to appointments of newer boardmembers. Dickmann questioned possibility of Willis providing a parks tour in order for newer boardmembers to better understand issues. Nunn suggested it include discussing possible areas for bench placement. She mentioned inviting Connie Gerlitz to the Fairweather portion of tour. Responding to Willis, Dickmann indicated park areas with priority issues should be toured first. Boardmembers agreed that a Saturday morning in November would work with their schedules. Five -Corners (7:29 pm) Since Mayor Adam was in attendance, Ngouenet suggested boardmembers express their Five -Corners ideas. Bruskern expressed Five -Corners landscaping needs, which include relocating good plant material, using weed block, eliminating the horse tail, amending soil, and adding primary plants with four seasons of color. He suggested rather than sidewalks going around area they could go through it. Dickmann supported Bruskern's idea of splitting Five -corners to incorporate a pathway. She also suggested planting water wise plants. Nunn advocated tying Five -Corners paths together, while still addressing concerns over area becoming too manicured. Nunn suggested planting trees to form a tunnel shaped entrance. Arakawa stated her support of ideas mentioned, but indicated the importance of maintaining boundary separating area from intersection. Ngouenet expressed concern over parks department budget being insufficient for Five -Corners upgrades. He expressed hopefulness the city council would provide financial support for Five-Comer's area. Park Signs (7:38 pm) Nunn advocated that one side of enclosed bulletin board be used for public notices and other side for community event postings. There was further discussion regarding the different types of postings allowable. Dickmann suggested the community board be evaluated on a trial basis. Nunn suggested plexi-glass, corkboard and trim pieces to improve appearance of bulletin boards. Park Board Minutes October 16, 2006 Page 2 New Business Northwest Parks Safety Net Fund (7:45 pm) Willis reported that he received a letter from Northwest Parks indicating they received $1,650 in donations to be used for city parks purposes. He stated that funds need to be allocated or they would be deposited in organization's general fund. MOTION NUNN, SECOND BRUSKERN ALLOCATE THE DONATED $1,650 FOR TANGIBLE ITEMS SUCH AS FAIRWEATHER'S BASKETBALL HOOP AREA OR PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT IN MEDINA PARK, 7:48 PM. AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, NUNN REVISED MOTION TO READ THE FOLLOWING: MOTION NUNN, NGOUENET SECOND TO RECOMMEND THAT BOARD SEEK DISTRIBUTION OF THE FUNDS MENTIONED IN THE NW PARK RESOURCES LETTER AND CONSIDER ITS USE AT A FUTURE MEETING FOR SOMETHING SPECIFIC AND TANGIBLE, MOTION PASSED 5-0, 7:52 PM. Park Ponds (7:52 pm) Willis reported that city's ponds are high in phosphorous, which means they are low in dissolved oxygen and have a lower water quality. He explained he has hired a firm that uses a machine to filter the water, and add nutrients. Willis said they will start with the North pond to determine how well the system works. Willis said he would rather not add chemicals to eliminate the problem. Willis said water quality may improve after the Overlake Golf Course maintenance facility is finished, but there would still be street run-off. He indicated aerators could not keep up with the organic matter, which is using all of the oxygen. Willis explained the filter is in a large box on the side of the pond. He stated they are currently in process of measuring base line. West Nile Virus (7.57 pm) Responding to Arakawa, Willis said that last spring King County tested wild life for West Nile Virus. Willis explained the importance of wearing long sleeved shirts and using mosquito repellant. the edging and asked if more chips could be added. Willis replied that more woodchips would be added. Ngouenet asked if trash on the trails could be monitored by the public works department. Nunn indicated that a suggestion was made in the past to add trashcans along the trails, in which Willis responded that problem is with collecting trash. He added that his department is currently responsible for picking up trash at city hall, as well as all parks. Willis indicated overfilled trashcans would attract rodents. Ngouenet said he did not think trashcans would work and added that it would be more effective to monitor the trails. Arakawa asked if there was an interim solution to the Fairweather stair issue mentioned in the last meeting. She questioned if it were possible to remove stairs. Adjournment MOTION TO ADJOURN THE SEPTEMBER 18, 2006 PARK BOARD MEETING, MOTION PASSED 5-0, 8:07 PM. The October 16, 2006, Park Board meeting was adjourned at 8:07 pm. The next Park Board meeting will be held Monday, November 20, 2006 at 7:00 pm. Minutes taken by: Pam Greytak Administrative Assistant ITEM H-6 DRAFT CITY OF MEDINA Planning Commission Meeting October 24, 2006 Medina City Hall 7:00 p.m. 501 Evergreen Point Road CALL TO ORDER Mark Nelson called the Planning Commission meeting of October 24, 2006, to order at 7:08 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Jim Frank, Bret Jordan, Mark Nelson, Judie O'Brien, Karen Sparks, and Gerry Zyfers Absent: John Maffei (excused) Staff Present: Joseph Gellings, Director of Development Services; Tim Tobin, Engineering Consultant; and Pam Greytak, Administrative Assistant ANNOUNCEMENTS Gellings announced that the City Council addressed non -conforming envelopes during their October meeting. He also mentioned that they are interested in making a code change, and that they provided feedback on drafting ordinance. Gellings confirmed for Nelson that City Manager, Doug Schulze accepted a position with the City of Normandy Park and his last day will be October 27, 2006. He also verified that the interim City Manager, Roger Crum will start on November 6, 2006. Gellings explained that the City Council is currently interviewing search firms. MINUTES Zyfers asked that the following changes be made to the September 26, 2006 minutes: 1) On page 6. 6th paragraph, term "parking time differences" be replaced DRAFT Frank asked that the following sentence be added to the September 26, 2006 minutes, as well as the October 8, 2006 minutes: "This is a compression of a lengthy meeting and a recording is available." Sparks asked that the following be added to the September 26, 2006 minutes: "Zyfers asked Mr. Wu reason for proposed plan revision, in which Mr. Wu indicated it was for financial reasons and Mrs. Lee considered letting store sit vacant." Nelson asked that the following changes be made to the September 26, 2006 minutes: 1) Indicate that Sparks's absence was excused. 2) That a comma be inserted after the word Frank, on page 2, 4tn paragraph. Gelling suggested the Commission further discuss matters regarding minutes after the Construction Mitigation Hearings. Nelson asked that the following changes be made to the October 8, 2006 minutes: MOTION FRANK AND SECOND JORDAN TO APPROVE SEPTEMBER 26, 2006 MEETING MINUTES AS AMENDED: Preamble be added under the Historical Use Permit heading on page 3 of the September 26, 2006 minutes that read as follows: "This is a compression of a lengthy meeting. We recommend that you listen to the recording for additional information." MOTION PASSED 6-0, 7:36 PM 1) Indicate that Zyfers attended meeting via telephone. 2) Run spell check, as some words were compressed with no spaces, due to a printing problem. DRAFT MOTION JORDAN AND SECOND O'BRIEN TO APPROVE OCTOBER 8, 2006 MEETING MINUTES AS AMENDED: Preamble be added under the Historical Use Permit heading on page 1 of the October 8, 2006 minutes that read as follows: "This is a compression of a lengthy meeting. We recommend that you listen to the recording for addition information." MOTION PASSED 6-0, 7:41 PM AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION No audience participation. PUBLIC HEARINGS Nelson opened the public hearings at 7:42 pm. Construction Mitigation Plan, Level Two, C-1548 8460 NE 71h St, Medina (7:42 pm) Demolition and construction of single-family residence. Tobin read the staff report and recommended approval of construction mitigation plan following a public hearing and with three additional conditions as outlined in report. Tobin answered inquiries from commissioners about water drainage, trees in right-of-way, and sewer easement. Nelson opened a public hearing at 7:54 pm. Doug Farrow, 3130 Alki Ave. SW, Seattle, WA (7.55 pm) Mr. Farrow addressed sewer placement question for Nelson. Paul Poliak, Medina, WA (7:56 pm) Mr. Poliak expressed concerns about potential drainage issues after construction. Tobin responded to Frank and Nelson regarding possible solutions to surface water runoff. DRAFT MOTION JORDAN AND SECOND FRANK TO APPROVE CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION PLAN C-1548, AS PROPOSED BY STAFF WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL CONDITION: Construction means and/or methods shall be employed by the contractor so that surface water runoff to neighboring properties during construction shall be minimized, MOTION PASSED 6-0 (8:06 PM Construction Mitigation Plan, Level Two C-1545 2633 Evergreen Point Road, Medina (8:06 pm) Demolition and construction of single-family residence. Tobin read staff report and recommended approval of construction mitigation plan following a public hearing and with three additional conditions as outlined in report. Tobin and Frank discussed neighbor's private lane. Dan Martin, Monroe Design and Development, Medina, WA (8:14 pm) Mr. Martin reported that the entrance gate would probably be eliminated. He stated neighbors would be provided with a project flowchart, as well as a detailed monthly report. Mr. Martin indicated contractor would be available for any concerns. Mr. Martin and Nelson discussed placement of portable toilet. Linda Dix, Medina, WA (8:18 pm) Mrs. Dix reiterated that she and her husband own the shared private lane. She pointed out the difficulties they had experienced in the past with idling vehicles and traffic noise. Mrs. Dix further elaborated on concerns with driveway gate and pet restrictions. Richard Dix, Medina, WA (8:23 pm) Mr. Dix gave details about driveway gate problem. He thanked the Commission for their time and said he was looking forward to having the Nakajima's as neighbors. The commission entered into discussion and the following amendments to the staff report resulted: 1) The temporary opaque construction fence shall be located on the east property line rather the west property line. A temporary opaque construction fence shall be located along the southern property line not later than at the time the owner of the property to the south occupies the new house, which is currently under construction. Planning Commission Minutes October 24, 2006 Page 4 DRAFT 2) Contractor personnel and suppliers shall not be allowed to park, idle, or stage vehicles or equipment in the portion of the private lane on the property of 2631 Evergreen Point Road. Staff recommends that a sign be required to be posted on the north side of the private lane, at the entrance, which reads: No parking, staging, or blocking lane. 3) Installation of utilities in the private lane shall be coordinated with the neighbor and a minimum 48-hour pre -notification provided. All such work in the private lane shall be planned and sequenced in such a manner that the length of any lane blockage or utility disruption is the absolute minimum necessary to complete the work. Rutting or damage to the lane shall be immediately repaired, either temporarily or permanent. At the conclusion of the project the lane shall be restored to the preexisting condition or better. 4) Portable toilet to be located against existing fence on south side of the property. 5) Construction schedule shall be provided to neighbors adjoining the property or private lane upon project commencement. Monthly reports shall be provided to neighbors adjoining the property or the private lane. MOTION JORDAN-AND SECOND FRANK TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION PLAN C-1545 AS j PROPOSED BY STAFF WITH AMENDMENTS OUTLINED BY COMMISSION, MOTION PASSED 6-0, 8:29 PM. Recess (8:30) DISCUSSION Historical Use Permit, (HUP No. 2006 - 01) 802 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA (8:35 pm) Commissioners discussed the Fact Finding document and agreed on the following amendments: Frank proposed reiterating the two mandated criteria utilized to formulate their vote. He further suggested these be included at the beginning of the HUP-2006- 01 minutes. Zyfers suggested changing the term "viable" to "more viable" on page 8. Sparks suggested adjusting the following points: • Add "using 1956 square feet for retail floor area" to end of sentence in section one. Planning Commission Minutes October 24, 2006 Page 5 DRAFT Add an additional section that reads, "HUP 2003-01 provided for building to be constructed that had 2,511 square feet of retail floor area on main floor." • Add to section eight, after the word "basement," "for a total of 4,527 square feet of retail space." • Change section 11 to read, "Commission could not make any finding as to the effect of the revision on values of adjacent properties because no evidence was submitted from an appraiser or real estate professional." Jordan proposed adding a section that reads, "Commissioners relied on the information contained in HUP-2003-01." Jordan also requested that HUP-2003- 01 document be attached to the agreement. MOTION JORDAN AND SECOND FRANK TO APPROVE HUP, 2006-01, AS PROPOSED WITH AMENDMENTS OUTLINED BY COMMISSION, MOTION PASSED 6-0, 9:05 PM Substandard properties (9:11 pm) Gellings discussed with the Commissioners his recommendation to approve Substandard Properties. ADJOURNMENT MOTION FRANK AND SECOND ZYFERS TO ADOPT STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO REPEAL MMC 17.040.25, MOTION CARRIED 6-0, 9:17 PM. MOTION ZYFERS AND SECOND JORDAN TO ADJOURN OCTOBER 24, 2006 PLANNING COMMISSIN MEETING, MOTION CARRIED 6-0 9:18 PM Commissioners cancelled adjournment and resumed meeting. (9:20 pm) Commissioners rescheduled the December 26, 2006 meeting to December 20, 2006. Commissioners and Gellings briefly discussed non -conforming envelopes, original grade, and sloped lots. MOTION JORDAN AND SECOND O'BRIEN TO ADJOURN OCTOBER 24, 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MEETING CARRIED 6-0 9:27 PM Planning Commission Minutes October 24, 2006 Page 6 The Planning Commission meeting of October 24, 2006, adjourned at 9:27 pm. The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, November 28, 2006, at 7:00 pm. Minutes taken by: Pam Greytak Administrative Assistant Planning Commission Minutes October 24, 2006 Page 7 Of Mp��9 CITY OF MEDINA City Manager's Office 501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.233.6400 www.medina-wa.gov MEMORANDUM Date: Nov 8, 2006 To: Mayor & Council Members From: Roger D. Crum, Interim City Manager w Re: First Week As of this writing I have been on the job for three days, and I regret to inform you that I do not have all the answers to all the questions yet. It has been an interesting time to come on board with the budget, a major land use issue, the capital improvement program and two union contracts all on the first week's city council agenda. It will be a full evening! I have not yet had the opportunity to meet with each of you individually, but would like to do so as soon as possible. 1 will be contacting you soon to find a time of mutual availability. In the meantime feel free to contact me at any time if you have an issue you would like me to be aware of or take action on. 1 N W M` O W ,t 7 W A W Ic" O N O O m Q R W W CA Ol O co to Cii ri '- m CCl cV C7 m O m N W 0 7 c'N1 O N O N Of Ln CO N cNf O It) m O HHHHHHto"""I H IHl I H O O r oO 8 O W CA H H f9 O OO r O O H H H O O r r r r r r r r r C O O W N W H H H H H H H H H H H pH N �CW7NOti Oq C OiWO N W P A S tOWpl W W O m w 8 T 9 9 N N M< r N 10 aD W m cn O �O H fppAHHHH H HHH H H H VW' t7 N C/Wi O CWD �� N O W O W W hN V CAN OOi r to O O W A A W W O M O CD O A R aD WCO OO t0 W H H HT H H e H� H N H H H H H pH : �P'IW WC1f �l'7N . CMO O O O W N C mWN;:SM cco 1_) O chw W N AM N W W W CD N CA A O M .-- W 7 .-- O V W 0W W co W H H H H H 611,40 H H H H H W O W W W� N O W W It N O O W a CD A fO W A A c O Lq 00 Cl) W � M n c � C Ct $ N W -e e- r CA O .t A W �O H H H H H H H H H H H H M O Cp O O N Cl W V O 10 m O O W M W pNp CD N OWiWmO1 -�NNag N C14 S W W V' W A W tlf W O W 1OD N V H pH HHHH toll off pH aH H H too tC1�pmS p�paDOpK INA ONi 8 N e'n N N CM7 M W l+1 N A A O Of W ?NN co m A � tlf rN MW CA N M M H H H H H H H H H H H H H 7 m qN W 'Wt OWi (NcV� UO W Ocli O N W W N.W O m r r N T Cn0 S R M N A '- 7 W l!) N O A �- NW Q — Cl) W N CA M W v N H HH H fo>H HHHH H H Vo O W W W N W R WW 'Q O A A O ? W W W W f") CA W W W O W M Ol W cV C O W � 7 A W M A (V CD a �A' co O N W W f7 .- c0 W O N N w n W to M W N W H HH H HH HHHH toll H fA cc co N W W N N O W v N O M N O N O O M W O Of O CA O C7 CO A M O W N N O lh N W O O C W cW0 0 C Vi W O K W W M — N P O co W O H H H H H H H H H H H H Mf V m ro a > O i H 7 'U a C m -p X M m m CLo m a 2�3 myEmF°- �C C CN y $ V mCL Uu.�mcntn.1 o z S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 6 0 ", Offender Medical Costs ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON .edical costs for offenders, including prescriptions, are a significant issue for local governments.An C M E S attorney general's opinion released last year brought renewed interest in this issue and, without assistance, some cities face costs that could significantly impact their ability to operate. 2005 Attorney General Opinion: Arresting Agency Responsible for Offender Medical Costs A formal Attorney General's Opinion issued last summer places responsibility for the cost of providing medical care to anyone arrested on "the agency whose officers have made the arrest leading to the imprisonment of the detainee." This applies regardless of the level of offense — whether it is a felony or misdemeanant arrest. Many jurisdictions previously understood that felony inmates' medical costs would be borne by the county, regardless of which agency made the arrest. Ultimately, this may result in a city paying the medical costs of any offender a city police officer arrests prior to -itencing — whether they are arresting the person under spicion of a misdemeanor, which traditionally has been a city responsibility, or felony violation. Other Views Some cities read the statute to be consistent with the AGO opinion and have either provided in jail contracts to allocate responsibility; or have taken a stance that the county is required to provide documentation that they have pursued all other available funding for offender medical costs before submitting them for reimbursement to the city. Cities could have significant additional expenses under the AGO if an interlocal agreement is not in place that provides medical coverage for pre -sentencing felony inmates through another source. Different Local Approaches - AWC Survey In early 2006,AWC sent surveys to cities with law enforcement to see what kinds of arrangements cities have for dealing with offender medical costs and which cities may be impacted by a change in practice that may have occurred due to the AGO.The different arrangements make the impacts of the AGO fall harder on some jurisdictions than others and may make it necessary to have multiple options to help cities limit costs. Some cities roll medical and other costs into their regular contractual payment for jail services, sometimes paying more than is incurred and sometimes less. Some cities also have an interlocal agreement in place that explicitly names the county as the responsible party for covering felony inmate expenses. Others do not have contracts, have contracts that are silent on the matter, or have contracts that specifically allocate all or a portion of the costs to the city. Potential Solutions AWC is in the process of exploring several solutions that would limit felony inmate medical costs for all local jurisdictions. • Legislative approach In the 2006 Legislative session, HB 2950 was introduced at the request of cities and counties to provide state funding for extraordinary medical costs by adding costs of more than $15,000 per offender per year to the allowable use of the existing extraordinary criminal justice account continued Association of Washington Cities 9 1076 Franklin St SE 9 Olympia,WA 98501 • www.awcnet.org S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 6 iA Cities Support LiabilityReform ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON including Limits for Offender Supervision C ' ' E S and Seat Belt Evidence Admissibility For the past several years,AWC has made legislation to reduce local government liability a top priority. Currently, local governments can be sued for incidents that happen while employees are performing their public duty. These are often inherently risky services that are not and will not be performed by any other entity. For example, the activities of those that improve community safety such as jail, offender supervision, law enforcement, and fire services. These risks often involve the actions of third parties over which government has little or no authority or ability to control. Offender Supervision One area of particular concern to cities is growing liability offender supervision. Citiesprimarily supervise people drunk -driving and domestic violence offenses and many believe community safety is improved by such supervision. However, under a recent series of court decisions, cities may now be required to compensate individuals damaged by people who are under your supervision — even if you have no authority to control their behavior. Cities don't have the same powers for supervision as the state, and they have less liability protection Misdemeanant probation departments bear little resemblance to felony community supervision conducted by the state Department of Corrections. For example, misdemeanant probation departments have no arrest powers, carry no firearms, and do not make field contacts with the offender. Despite these limitations on your authority, local government is held to a higher standard of liability for misdemeanant supervision than the Department of Corrections. For drunk -driving related charges, state law requires supervision To avoid liability related to supervision for drunk -driving, a reasonable approach would be to not supervise. However, state law doesn't allow it. Under RCW 46.61.5055(9)(a), a court must either sentence a person convicted of a DUI to the full 365 days in jail — assuming jail capacity to do so - or impose conditions that are subject to supervision to fill the 365 day sentence. The mandate in state law that DUI offenders must either be jailed for their full sentence or be placed under supervision leaves cities no real discretion. Further, many believe our communities are safer when domestic violence offenders or drunk drivers ARE supervised.The only real solution is a change in state law. Seat Belt Evidence Rules Increase Judgment Costs for Cities Cities also have supported legislation allowing the admissibility of seatbelt evidence in civil cases. In lawsuits regarding auto accidents, a defendant is currently not allowed to use this evidence — even if wearing a seatbelt would have lessened the injuries.As a result, defendants may be required to pay damages beyond what they were actually responsible for. Government entities, as the "deep pocket" defendants in many auto cases, can bear the brunt of these increased judgments. Association of Washington Cities 9 1076 Franklin St SE 9 Olympia, WA 98501 • www.awcnet org continued S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 6 l ASSOCIATION nitiative 933 (1-933): Government OF W_ INGTON Private Propertyci i �Es Regulation of Initiative 933 - Government Regulation of Private Property The "Property Fairness Coalition" organization filed Initiative 933 (please see www.secstate.wa.gov/elections/initiatives/ text/1933.pdf for a copy of this initiative), and it has been certified for the November 2006 ballot. Initiative 933 would fundamentally impact how the state, cities and counties regulate land use.The basic idea is that: • Prior to adopting regulations that limit the use of private property, alternatives should be considered and impacts determined on specific properties. • If proposed regulations decrease values — no matter how small, government shouldn't impose them or must pay. • If applying or enforcing existing regulations would decrease to any extent the value of property, government must pay for decrease or not apply or enforce. How this all works, which regulations are included and how it applies to new as compared to already in place regulations is not clear — in part because provisions apply retroactively in several instances.To many legal and land use interests,1-933's language is considered vague and ambiguous. If it is adopted, the courts likely will define its scope. Overview More specifically, 1-933 would: • Require local governments evaluate an array of issues, including: reason for the regulation, impact, less restrictive alternatives, and compensation - prior to adopting or continuing to enforce a regulation or ordinance that may impact private property values. • Redefine "damage" to include prohibiting or restricting uses that were legal as of January 1, 1996. • Apply to both real and personal property. • Require compensation in advance of enforcing a regulation that results in "damaging the use or value of property' • Prohibit local or state government from charging applicants a fee when determining whether to grant a variance or waiver to avoid liability. Frequently Asked Questions How does 1-933 affect current zoning and regulations adopted under the Growth Management Act (GMA)? It prohibits adoption of any new GMA regulations that don't allow a use that has been permitted in the past.A city can't adopt a new, more restrictive use and then pay for it. How are critical area regulations impacted? • Cities or counties can't enforce critical area regulations adopted after January 1, 1996 that impose greater restrictions on the property without first compensating property owners for any decline in use. • Regulations tied to the environment, like prohibiting development in wetlands, steep slopes or buffers around streams, no matter when they were adopted, can't be enforced without compensation. • 1-933 includes a list of regulations exempted from compensation, including a regulation that prevents an immediate threat to health and safety. What is an immediate threat? Unsure.A direct discharge that contaminates drinking water probably qualifies. Courts likely would have to determine what constitutes an "immediate" threat — for instance whether or not locating structures in a. 100-year flood plain would qualify. What regulations are exempt? This is one of the most debated questions. 1-933 language exempts several regulations if they're "applied equally" within a jurisdiction. It isn't known what that means. Zoning continued The following information is offered for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an expression of support or opposition to the initiative. Association of Washington Cities • 1076 Franklin St SE • olympia,WA 98501 • www.awcnet-org S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 6 AA Streamlined Sales Tax ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON sties Support Streamlined Sales Tax Legislation with Full Mitigation C l 11 E S 0 ne of AWC's top legislative priorities for the 2007 session is expected to include passage of legislation for Washington to conform to the Streamlined Sales & Use Tax Agreement (SSTA) that includes full mitigation. Passage of this legislation in 2007 is important to our businesses, cities, counties, and the economic competitiveness of the state. The SSTA is the result of several years' works by ecommerce retailers and traditional "brick and mortar" stores, more than 40 states, and the District of Columbia to simplify, modernize, and create uniformity in state sales tax structures nationwide. Washington has actively participated in the SSTA national discussions since its creation, and the Washington State Legislature passed most of the steps needed to bring our state in compliance in 2003. . '-'owever, controversy surrounding SSTA's "sourcing" ivisions, the major remaining provision, created controversy between cities in the 2004 and 2005 sessions. Following the agreement reached by cities in September 2005 regarding mitigation, that controversy is resolved. 2006 Session (SSB 6594) Last session, the Governor introduced legislation to fully implement SSTA in Washington, and an amended version with full mitigation passed unanimously in the Senate, SSB 6594. While the House failed to take action on the bill before the end of the session, we have been assured that it will be addressed in the 2007 session. Passage of Legislation is Important to Washington Businesses in 2007 Passage of this legislation levels the playing field for Washington's businesses, including small main street retailers. Those businesses collect the sales tax and provide jobs to Washington's citizens.They are at a competitive disadvantage with out-of-state retailers who do not collect the sales tax and reap the benefits of this tax loophole. Internet sales increased 25% during the 2005 holiday season. The legislature needs to act in 2007 to insure equity for our businesses and small retailers, who serve as the core of many of our downtowns. The uniformity and simplicity provided by the SSTA will also greatly assist our larger regional retailers and internet sellers. The SSTA offers remote sellers incentives to voluntarily begin collecting state sales taxes.To date, approximately 700 sellers have registered under the SSTA. Cities Agree to Full Mitigation In September 2005, cities and counties reached agreement to seek full mitigation for revenue losses from destination - based sourcing and are seeking full mitigation. Mitigation is not permanent and ends for each mitigated city or county when new revenues from voluntary compliance exceed the sourcing change based loss. AWC's Message Tell your legislators that approval of this legislation will: • Level the playing field for Washington businesses including small main street retailers.Washington businesses collect the sales tax and provide jobs to our citizens.They're at a competitive disadvantage with out- of-state retailers. • The uniformity and simplicity provided by the SSTA will also greatly assist our larger regional retailers and internet sellers. Internet sales increased 25% during the 2005 holiday season. The Legislature needs to act in 2007 to ensure equity for our small businesses, who serve as the core of many of our downtowns. continued Association of Washington Cities • 1076 Franklin St SE 9 Olympia,WA 98501 a www.awcnet.org S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 6 Federal Telecommunications ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON Act Rewrite is Underway c M E s Background On June 28, a Senate committee approved a broad telecommunications bill that reflects many of the industry's priorities.This was considered a major victory for the telephone companies. The vote was a setback for Internet companies and public interest groups, who maintain its "net neutrality" language is too weak to prevent phone and cable operators from using their control over the nation's broadband networks to favor their own online traffic or discriminate against others'. The Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee voted 15-7 to approve the legislation, which would ease telecommunications regulations in order to drive competition among traditional phone companies, cable ^nerators,wireless carriers and broadband providers.The :asure's core provisions would make it easier for phone companies to enter the video business. Senator Maria Cantwell voted NO on final passage and voted YES on build -out and net neutrality.An amendment by Senator George Allen to make the moratorium on Internet Access Taxes permanent also passed overwhelmingly (Senator Cantwell voted Yes). On July 3, the national associations (which includes National League of Cities (NLC), National Association of Telecommunications Officers & Advisors (NATOA), and the US Conference of Mayors) sent'a letter to Senators Ted Stevens and Danial Inouye (primary sponsors of the bill) regarding concerns over H.R. 5252 (formerly S. 2686) as passed out of Committee.Those concerns include: • the inclusion of the new cell phone tax moratorium; • the extension of the Internet Tax Freedom Act; The letter acknowledged several important changes to the draft bill that improved the legislation during the markup. However, the national associations were clear that unless they receive assurances that the tax amendments and the modification to the video service provider definition will be removed during floor debate, they urge their members to oppose the bill.You can obtain a copy of the letter at www. nic.org/content/Files/PFR%20-%2OStevenslnouyeLetterO7O3O 6.pdf Local Government Interest in the Telecommunications Act Rewrite Local governments strongly endorse promoting competition that will allow new broadband -video providers to enter our communities with level playing fields, while maintaining the local franchise authority so important to cities and counties. Local governments want video competition and have actively sought it for years, but they do not favor: Giving the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Washington, D.C., control and oversight over how localities manage their local streets and rights of way and taking away local authority to handle their residents' cable customer service complaints. • Subsidizing service to a few well to do neighborhoods while less well to do neighborhoods are left behind without competition and with higher prices and poorer service. • Allowing telephone companies to provide broadband - video services only to some of their telephone customers, leaving others behind. • Cutting current levels of financial support for local community programming and emergency communications. • the lack of a reasonable build -out requirement; and Subsidizing communications companies' use of local • the modification of the "video service provider" definition streets and rights of way. to exclude. satellite service integrated with landline ervice. continued Association of Washington Cities • 1076 Franklin St SE • Olympia,WA 98501 • www.awcnet.org 1. Objective The City of Medina is one of many municipalities nationally interested in establishing a high-speed wireless broadband network to deliver new services for city and public use. New services may include the ability for a city to deliver; provide Policeman with robust web -based access to crucial law enforcement information while on community patrol, provide city inspectors with real-time field -based access to building permit inspection and processing forms, provide emergency responders with access to IP based video systems during emergency situations, offer subscription/free or subsidized public internet access, and overall create opportunities for efficiency in city operations. 2. Current Status of Medina's Cable and Network Infrastructure Comcast serves all of the City of Medina with cable and Internet services. Telecommunications company QWEST serves the community with wireline voice and DSL services, and a variety of cellular companies (Verizon, Sprint/Nextel and Cingular) provide cellular voice and limited data networks. The City Hall local area network infrastructure consists of 7 servers and 20 workstations. Server functionality includes 2 data servers, 1 document imaging, 2 email/communications, and 2 DNS. Comcast and Medina are currently re -negotiating a cable franchise agreement. It apparently is close to finalization as Medina awaits Comcast's review. Medina's objective is to ensure that its cable infrastructure is state-of-the-art. As a result, Medina was interested in discussing a fiber build -out plan as part of the discussion, Comcast declined. The opportunity for Medina to build or partner to build out a next generation wireless broadband network or use an existing network to improve city operations and offer new services to residents provide a compelling value proposition for Medina to investigate and launch its wireless initiative. 3. Wireless "A Rapidly Evolving Market" Developments in wireless technologies and products are changing at a rapid pace. Cities are moving quickly to deploy WiFi, Mesh and WiMAX technologies for general and municipal uses, and expanding the original WiFi hotspot model to city-wide coverage by using Mesh technologies. Because WiFi operates in an unlicensed frequency, cities cannot regulate, influence or control its use or users. We believe cities must operate in licensed frequencies using technologies which are more robust, managed by the license owner and regulated by the FCC. We encourage municipalities to focus on identifying the business case for wireless, then investigate and learn to operate and manage these technologies by piloting small projects prior to making significant investments. The next generation of wireless networking technology based on the WiMAX standards was finalized in 2005. As adopted, this standard will allow consumers, small businesses, large institutions and corporations, or networks of professionals and businesses with a common interest, such as the public safety community, to wirelessly connect to each other and access the Internet. Leading companies with a central role in the development of WiMAX technologies are already well represented in the Puget Sound area. C1earWire, Sprint/Nextel, Cingular, Norte] and Motorola and others are building their 4G or next generation networks on the WiMAX standards, Equipment based on the older WiFi standard is increasingly widespread, and new applications are constantly being developed for general use by the public and for internal use by municipalities. WiMAX technology complements (can backhaul to WiFi) WiFi technology by making it faster and less expensive to deploy, and by making it easier for companies to pursue the sort of public/private partnerships being developed in many cities. This combination of a technology -oriented community and leading technology companies provides the foundation for the creation of a ubiquitous wireless broadband system in the City of Medina that can serve a diverse range of needs. At the request of the City of Medina, this document reviews the advantages, challenges, potential wireless services and applicable technology options, cost models and provide recommendations. This document is intended to be a brief guide to help the city determine next steps in pursuing the best high speed wireless path. City of Medina • High Speed Wireless Initiative Report • Wireless Fidelity Networks • Page 2 Cl) l0 a C w 2 5. Advantages and Challenges Associated with Municipal High Speed Wireless Networks Residents of the City of Medina are among the most technologically skilled, technically sophisticated and among the highest users of the latest technology anywhere. As with any promising new technology, there are substantial advantages and challenges when contemplating high speed municipal wireless networks and services. Key questions include: What do citizens want most from the technology? What services does the city want to improve? Is the city willing to permit commercial involvement in exchange for reduced costs? What is the current infrastructure and how would it work with new wireless technologies? Is there an existing wireless cloud provided by another entity or will there be one soon? What technology and business model would work best? What kind of budget is available in the exploration phase and are other revenue sources possible? Municipal broadband networks serve many digital infrastructure needs of communities committed to delivering wireless Internet -based access to their residents, businesses and employees. These wireless "third pipes" offer commercial Internet access and mobile access for city employees anywhere in the city, improving field productivity and allowing more effective operations out of the office. 6. Advantages of a City -Wide Wireless Network As the city's high speed wireless initiative evolves, it will benefit in three major ways: a. Community and Public Access Free, ubiquitous wireless Internet access is the centerpiece of what Medina aspires to achieve: a vibrant, inventive and thriving economy for residents and businesses through wireless technologies. A city-wide wireless network would allow all a connection to make use of the World Wide Web. Students with laptops would be able to make the city their classroom —looking up information anytime, anywhere —and emailing reports and homework assignments from wherever they happen to be learning. Anyone could work, communicate with family and friends and do much more from parks or other places. Businesspeople would be able to work virtually anywhere — without having to seek often -expensive "hot spots" in coffee shops, bookstores and other locations. Businesses that transmit large amounts of data from the field would have new, reliable and inexpensive means to improve productivity and accuracy and remain constantly in touch. The applications are limited only by the active imaginations of the people who work in Medina's businesses, nonprofit organizations, and public agencies. New uses for wireless Internet access not mentioned here will also emerge in the near future. City of Medina ■ High Speed Wireless Initiative Report • Wireless Fidelity Networks - Page 4 b. Efficiencies in Municipal Operations The public would experience significant benefits as city employees and city services become more efficient with high speed wireless. Inspectors will be able to complete permit forms and documents online at construction sites —making the process of getting a permit much more efficient and customer oriented. Other field employees will be able to operate "virtually" at little cost —accessing needed information without traveling to their offices, saving time and gasoline. Data input will be more accurate when entered directly into laptops or PDAs, as opposed to onsite pen and paper notes for later transcription. "Sensors" — ranging from weather equipment to water -flow meters —will be able transmit data quickly, accurately and continuously at virtually no cost. Using a common, secure wireless infrastructure instead of multiple technologies that include cellular mobile data service and leased lines will minimize costs, oversight and confusion. The bottom line: better services for residents, potential significant cost savings and improved employee morale. c. Enhance Public Safety Safety and security is a major advantage of high speed wireless. Police officers could get the benefits Everett and Bremerton officers now employ. A wireless device in the trunk of each police cruiser enables officers to connect to their department network, where they can review mug shots, access databases, receive text from the dispatcher, and file incident reports with extremely high speed. A voice -activated tool enables them to dictate those reports while on patrol, edit them quickly and conveniently, then transmit them to headquarters — without ever having to return to the station. The result: more time on patrol and substantial energy savings. Rapid access of an image of a lost or kidnapped child in the field could also be invaluable. Similarly, wireless cameras in key public areas could capture the faces, actions and license plates of troublemakers —and give police an advance look at the scene should they need to respond to a threat. With Medina's limited entry and exit points, such surveillance is very important. Medina's marine actions and surveillance could also benefit from high speed wireless technology. The city's mobile command post, also utilized by other local law enforcement entities, could be outfitted with wireless technology for mobile access to applications, data and video cameras to increase its effectiveness. Wireless could also replace an outdated and more expensive technology —land - based mobile radio. Wireless powers more capable, less -expensive and more reliable devices. City of Medina • High Speed Wireless Initiative Report • Wireless Fidelity Networks • Page 5 7. Challenges and Questions a. Determining the appropriate range of services b. What wireless services does the community really want? c. What technology (ies) provides the most opportunity for service growth? d. What is required to ready existing City applications for a wireless network? e. Would enhanced video surveillance capability for the Police Department provide a significant return on investment? 7.2 Business model f. Which business model is the best fit for the community — free-market based, municipally owned or some sort of mix? g. Is the community willing to give up some control in order to minimize costs and personnel oversight? 7.3 Costs/Budget h. What is the community willing to pay for high speed wireless services? i. How would the service be paid for? j. Is the city willing to give up some control to a third party for lower costs? k. How much will the system cost (capex, operations, management)? 7.4 Community fit and aesthetics 1. Would the technology hardware fit the community aesthetics? m. What hardware would or wouldn't work for the services sought? n. Is there community concern regarding potential health impacts of wireless technology as there apparently has been in the past? o. What level of commercialization is acceptable on the city's potential new high speed website? 7.5 Technology compatibility p. Would the high speed wireless technologies being considered add or subtract value to/from existing infrastructure? q. How significant would penetration be into buildings and structures? r. Will coverage be ubiquitous? City of Medina - High Speed Wireless Initiative Report • Wireless Fidelity Networks • Page 6 8. Cost and Operator Models As cities begin to investigate and deploy metropolitan scale wireless networks, no clear model has emerged yet. The big questions include: ■ Does the city own and operate the network as a utility? ■ How free or subsidized public access will be paid for? ■ Is an advertising or alternate revenue stream realistic? ■ Will the network be open to any 1SP? ■ Will the city become an anchor tenant on the network and pay for bandwidth usage? ■ Should the city share in revenue generated? ■ Will the city allow use of its utility infrastructure for free, of should the city set-up a 501 c3 to manage the utility or outsource operations and maintenance? Every city has different needs and municipal drivers which will determine the appropriate business model. (Other questions are addressed in the attached FAQ). A range of infrastructure ownership models could be employed based on Medina's business needs and resource capability. ■ 8.1 Privately -owned network: The outsourcing model. A private company creates and owns the network and provides free wireless to everyone (municipal services and the public). The company makes its money by offering a higher speed service for a fee to customers. ■ 8.2 City owned w/revenue stream: The city creates and runs the network that is advertiser supported, with a third party handling all sales and marketing. ■ 8.3 City owned: The city establishes its own network for municipal services and allows residents to use excess bandwidth. ■ 8.4 Hybrid city/private: The city establishes and pays for the network infrastructure and outsources network operations and management. City of Medina - High Speed Wireless Initiative Report - Wireless Fidelity Networks - Page 7 9. Current Municipal/County High Speed Wireless Projects There are literally hundreds of municipalities exploring, establishing or already deploying WiFi to serve citizens in cost-conscious, productive and creative ways. Most of them appear headed toward a municipally -owned or joint government -owned and operated entity with some private sector involvement. Here is a snapshot of some of those efforts. a. King County, WA King County is already one of the nation's leaders in the use of wireless technology. The county has deployed one of the largest WiFi networks in the U.S. at Marymoor Park, blanketing 170 acres with free, 24/7 wireless Internet service. Sponsored by MSN, the network is designed to serve the 4 million people who attend concerts, conferences, bicycle races, baseball practices and other events at the park each year. The county has also installed wireless service at the Weyerhaeuser -King County Aquatic Center in Federal Way, the Regional Justice Center in Kent, the King County Courthouse in Seattle, and eight other county facilities, including a wireless zone in the White Center community as part of an economic development initiative Bus riders with laptops or other WiFi equipped devices can access the Internet on two Metro bus routes —Route 48, which runs from the University District to Rainier Beach, and Route 197, which carries passengers from Kent, Des Moines and Federal Way to Seattle via Interstate 5. Twenty-nine buses on the two routes are equipped with cellular air cards connected to WiFi base stations. More than 1,000 U.S. transit agencies will be watching to see what lessons they can learn from the innovative experiment. b. Pierce County, WA Pierce County could have one of the largest WiFi coverage areas in the country very soon. Pierce County residents would receive free basic public access to the network for a limited time each day. Premium access would be provided for a subscription fee for higher levels of broadband access. Other services will include free access for law enforcement and emergency services agencies, access packages for municipalities and schools and a wholesale access plan so third party ISP providers can sell wireless access to their customers on the network. c. Portland, OR Portland has initiated an ambitious plan for a citywide wireless Internet system. The goal is to build a network in downtown Portland in 2006, and cover the rest of the city with WiFi within two years. Portland Public Schools, the TriMet transit agency, and other governments and agencies are also involved. The city says the project will cut the cost of providing telecommunications services to many schools and government offices, make the Internet available in more places, better serve businesses, and provide a low-cost broadband option for residents. City of Medina • High Speed Wireless Initiative Report • Wireless Fidelity Networks - Page 8 Other examples: (Municipal/County High Speed Wireless Projects) Metro -Scale Networks Park Networks y Other Free & Fee Networks City of Medina ■ High Speed Wireless Initiative Report Wireless Fidelity Networks • Page 9 10. Recommendations for the City of Medina ■ Appoint an individual in city government to lead the wireless initiative. ■ Establish a community outreach group involving a broad spectrum of the Medina community (similar to the recent permitting services effort) to assess: 1) extent of public interest; 2) specific expectations; 3) potential concerns and challenges, and 4) begin the public education process. ■ Hire an experienced wireless consulting organization to assist in the community outreach and decision -making phases. ■ Conduct a feasibility study once the community group has completed its work to answer its specific questions and recommendations. Those could include: Can a city-wide, wireless network be technically viable, financially feasible, provide for improved city operations and be data secure? Is there a strong enough value proposition to pursue a municipal high speed wireless network? Deliverables could also include a market assessment, RF spectrum survey and analysis conceptual designs and a business model analysis_ ■ Consider a business model that outsources much or all of the operational aspects of the network to keep city overhead and budgets low, and maintain consistency with the city's current IT program. ■ Encourage city department leadership to examine cost effective and innovative uses for wireless technology and build into upcoming budgets. ■ Establish a pilot project involving the Police Department that can be used to assess and validate both the technology and the associated business case going forward. ■ The Police Department pilot project should begin as a small scale public -private partnership that minimizes cost and risk by using existing City of Medina facilities. In addition, it is expected that associated technology assessed during the pilot project will be made available on a loan or in -kind contribution basis. ■ Since this is a fast -evolving area of technology, stay abreast of other municipal wireless efforts through this process for learnings, creative approaches, cost savings and other potential values. This approach allows the City of Medina to quickly position itself to take advantage of current opportunities by piloting available technology with proven partners, determine the community needs and investigate appropriate business models. City of Medina - High Speed Wireless Initiative Report • Wireless Fidelity Networks - Page 10 Attachments ■ City of Medina map with existing technology infrastructure ■ WFN "Road to Wireless Freedom" ■ WFN Wireless FAQ City of Medina - High Speed Wireless Initiative Report - Wireless Fidelity Networks - Page 11 r c co O cn E c 0 a t� OM C� L cn c6 (D a) 3 a v� � >, a) c N U U coO N .r E coc'c 3 �''� o c� U = O c E E o E a0i , °�' Q� E UJ Z R n D rn UU2 U E O � E ui N CD 4- L (D a) cn — N w O Cn LL o a 0 E°c O�v S` = N cn � A a) �+ v/ N c cu Q a) *-- U o cn 00 a-.?, E c m n rn UCU= E L. W� O C 00 a rn .r cc a °' E o O o m Q m a� w" M CO Z O w `° a° CL mU rj) LL E_ O E E ca (n Z O cn kt x >_ .0 d Q y+' N c a 4- W o U) a)c E� L O O ai E a) c c a) o ccQ v� 4) v c� CD = o a- im m Q m w a> C U) u IL U WFN MRsl.esa �oe<m► esrwoRics DRAFT v3 City of Medina High Speed Wireless Initiative: Frequently Asked Questions 1) How will wireless users be assured of secure communications? The wireless implementation must meet various levels of security encryption within the infrastructure based on the licensed technology used. Some Internet Service Providers provide varying levels of protection as part of their service. Just as with wired Internet access, each wireless Internet user's level of security will ultimately come down to how well the user applies the software and procedures that protect the system. 2) Will certain types of computers or systems be needed to utilize high speed wireless technology? WiFi cards that plug into standard desktop PC, notebook or tablet slots are readily available at reasonable cost. To set up wireless technology for the home is more expensive than just buying a card for a your notebook to access a WiFi hot spot, it is still very inexpensive compared to network cards just 5 years ago. It is projected that there will be consumer level cards available for WiMax soon, which has a far larger coverage area from an access point than WiFi. Intel and other companies are pushing for a standard for WiMax that would permit them to build wireless access right into their mother boards, which would eliminate the need for a special card for systems in the future. 3) How will this initiative enhance Internet access for Medina residents? Individuals and businesses benefit from access to wireless technology because it permits more options for access to buildings and mobile users. 4) Will there be a fee for this service, and if so, how much? Generally speaking wireless access won't be free. The Medina wireless project, like most in the US, will probably be carried out by private enterprise, because there is a business opportunity for this type of service. Wireless technology doesn't require extensive infrastructure development and implementation costs. Therefore customers' costs for wireless service are expected to be competitive and likely lower than many wired services. 5) If there is a fee, what's the benefit to the majority of the population over the prevalent methods of broadband (Le. cable, DSL)? Recent changes by the FCC have changed the types and costs of services available in the DSL and cable market. The costs for wireless in many areas are lower than wired services that are available today for the same bandwidth. The key issue with wireless access is that wireless provides a number of options for service that can only be done with wireless technology. Wireless technology will be the only cost effective way to address coverage problems. One of the most exciting things about wireless technology is the new service options that can be available for mobile employees. Many companies have staff that are out of the office or move between locations as part of their jobs. Service companies who have staff constantly on the road will be able to become far more efficient and provide far better service with wireless access available throughout the county. There are also more devices used in business that either require access to wireless service or can provide more function with wireless service. 6) Is there a role for private citizens and organizations in helping the community understand the value of this initiative? A significant part of Medina's high speed wireless initiative is a community group that will provide information, direction and ideas to city staff and potential vendors. Interested individuals are urged to contact XXXX XXXXX at XXX-XXXX for more information or see the city's website, www.medina-wa.gov. 7) If this moves forward, what is the expected timeframe for completion? It is early on in the process, but if the Medina community is sufficiently interested and key decisions are made soon, implementation could occur beginning in late 2006 or early 2007. Some pilot projects are being explored that could be initiated very soon. 8) What will citywide wireless do for me? For employees and residents who travel around the city that need to be connected to their office or Internet this is going to be a cost effective option. Wireless can also provide cost-effective broadband Internet service to homes and businesses. 10) Will the city of Medina provide the wireless service? The city of Medina's wireless initiative will probably be built and operated as a business venture, and the vendor(s) are expected to provide the service for a fee to pay for the project. Based on other projects around the US, it is expected that wireless Internet service will be just one of a number of business ventures that the technology will support. 11) How much will it cost to implement and maintain this initiative, and how will those costs be covered? The costs to cover the city of Medina with high speed wireless service and build the supporting infrastructure will vary, depending on the level of services sought, the infrastructure required and the business model the city decides to pursue, as well as other factors. The costs could be covered by a company or partnership of companies that develops the wireless project. As with any business venture, the vendor(s) will expect to recover costs from their customers. 12) Are there local/regional initiatives that could impact Medina's efforts? Highspeed wireless is a major emphasis nationally, and there are numerous initiatives underway, some of which are described in Medina's wireless initiative overview. As part of the initiative effort, all local and regional initiatives will be reviewed for any potential impacts and learnings. 13) How much of the city is expected to be covered by this project? The goal is to provide the most extensive coverage possible for the city of Medina. 14) Will local Internet service providers have an opportunity to participate in this initiative? The city of Medina's wireless initiative is looking at all reasonable options that are compatible with the city's needs, which include cost, breadth of service, security, customer orientation, aesthetic compatibility and others. 15) Many Medina residents already have broadband service. Will this service be free, and, if not, why would people want to use it? As indicated earlier, what has been seen around the US is that these types of projects can be implemented where wireless service is competitive with wired service. The costs are likely going to be dependent on what type of wireless services that a customer is purchasing. Just like other technology services on the market, wireless will likely have services based on bandwidth, service areas and other unique items provided by the Internet Service Provider. The free WiFi service in the area all tends to be inside businesses that are offering it as part of a dining experience or other business function that is providing the free service. In those cases the business providing the free access is paying a vendor to provide and maintain the service. 16) Will citywide high speed wireless cause health concerns? Wireless technologies have been in widespread use for years, and have not been found to cause significant adverse health impacts. Some level of debate has continued since wireless technologies have been in use and the subject continues to be studied. Electromagnetic energy and radio frequency radiation electromagnetic energy is emitted from many different sources and exist in forms throughout the electromagnetic spectrum (from infrared to ultraviolet light). Whenever this energy moves via wave propagation through space, radio frequency radiation (RFR) forms. Wireless technology emits RFR. In 1985, the FCC first adopted guidelines for evaluating human exposure to RF radiation, which were revised and updated in 1996. The FCC's RF exposure limits adopted in 1996 are based on those recommended by the National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. US radiation levels are not considered unhealthy or dangerous. A number of studies have been conducted to determine the effects of RFR on humans. Due to complexities in interpreting and collecting data, there have been no conclusive studies to prove that radiation from cellular technologies causes any additional risk to humans. The United States General Accounting Office concluded that no studies on cellular technology and low level radiation had conclusively proven that they have any long-term adverse health effects. Studies on cellular phone use by the National Cancer Institute and another funded by the cell phone industry and the U.S. Public Health Service, showed no statistical association between cell phone use and brain cancer risk. For more information: National Safety Council (www.nsc.orq); National Cancer Institute (www.cis.nci.nih.gov); National Council on Radiation Protection (www.ncro.com); International Radiation Protection Association (www.irpa11.com); Journal of the American Medical Association (www.jama.ama-assn.org); US General Accounting Office (www.gao.gov); World Health Organization (www.who.int). 17) Where else can information on wireless technology be found? Websites and libraries are significant sources of information. Helpful websites include: mobilemag.com; wirelessweek.com; rcrnews.com, others can be found by using search engines. Individual companies also have useful information on their sites. BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS PROPOSED INVESTMENTS FOR KING COUNTY RTID PROJECTS Project Name Proposed RTID Investments in millions)* SR 99: Alaska Way Viaduct 800 I-405 1,330 SR 520 Bride 800 I-5 Improvements and SR 509 Extension 870 SR 167 420 I-5 Improvements at SR 18 (Federal Way Triangle) 50 Additional Investments and Contingency 237 Total 4,507 [King County project spreadsheet.docl Regional Transportation Investment District The Regional Transportation Invesbwerrt District (RTID) was created by the Wash- ington State Legislature. Its job is to develop a package of improvements to major highways and bridges in Snohom- ish, King and Pierce counties that will relieve congestion and repair earthquake - vulnerable bridges. The package will be presented to voters in November 2007. RTID's governing board consists of all county council members in the three - county area, as well as the Washington State Secretary of Transportation, who serves as its non -voting chairman. A seven -member Executive Committee is empowered to develop and recommend the package of improvements. Blueprint for Progress The Blueprint for Progress is a draft RTID proposal for road and bridge investments in key highway corridors in Snohomish, King, and Pierce counties. It describes the corridor (i.e., SR 522, 1-405, SR 520, SR 167) investments, funding sources, projects and construction schedules. The Blueprint for Progress serves as the foundation for public review, cost estimat- ing, construction planning and refining of the RTID package. Citizens can review the Blueprint for Progress at www.rtid.org. Priodtbdng projects RTID developed a set of principles to evaluate which projects should be prioritized and Induded In the Blueprint for PnVross. i Build off existing state projects and work that is already underway ■ Concentrate on regional pr*cts in the most oa>Igested corridors ■ Integrate road and transit Investments to create a seamless system ■ Provide the greatest traffic -flow improvement throughout the region ■ Keep the investment package affordable. Potential projects Significant improvements would be made in the following corridors: • SR 167 (Renton/Puyallup Valley Freeway) • SR 162 (Orting) • Proposed SR 704 (Cross Base Highway) • SR 99 (Alaskan Way Viaduct) • I A05 (Renton/Bellevue/Eastside) • SR 509 (Burien/Sea-Tac) • SR 520 (Evergreen Point Bridge) • 1-5 @ SR18 (Federal Way) • US 2 (East Snohomish County) • SR 9 (Bothell/Snohomish) • SR 524 (Maltby) • CO 527 (Mill Creek) sR to ,van way vex l ungIS US 2 east of Everett KEY . Underway ■ Proposed swew(J) a Everett P MukNteo boot Edmonds Lynnwood �- w • 11P_' Shoreline ' ®f Northgate •_ Kirklan i University of washingro�„� ass s Capitol HRI Seattle a Mercer Island Rainier Valley Tukwila s SeaTa f KPnI Fede,al Tacoma Way Lakewood 0 n Mgt 1—d *R n 5 l ort L ewrc 1 1 . 1 • Aubu,n 1 1 1 1 Summer Pvyaau0 rin l hbn0 M woodk,vine Renton t.. Funding Regional Transportation Investments would be funded by just two sources: a .08 percent Motor Vehicle Excise investment District Tax (MVET) or car license fee, and a sales -and -use tax of up to .01 percent. A key funding principle is to minimize reliance on the sales tax and look primarily to the MVET Executive Board for funding. Shawn Bunney, Pierce County Chair Roads & Transit 2007 Julia Patterson, King County RTID and Sound Transit are collabo_ 'Ace -Chair -Chair Transit rating on a package of road/bridge and Roads &Trsit Dow Constantine, King County transit improvements that will be before voters at the November 2007 election. Roads & Transit 2007 is the name of their joint Reagan Dunn, King County planning effort. Their collective goal is to design a regional transportation system that Tim Farrell, Pierce County integrates major highway, bridge and transit improvements to better manage the region's traffic and improve the quality of life for residents. Dave Gossett, Snohomish County Gary Nelson, Snohomish County The Legislature has decided that both the RTID and the Sound Transit measures must be approved for either one to be valid. Planning Committee RTID is also working closely with the Washington State Department of Transportation All Executive RTID Board members and the regional planning agency, the Puget Sound Regional Council. Doug MacDonald, Secretary of Transportation Next steps and public involvement Non -voting Chair Citizens are encouraged to learn more by visiting www.rbd.org, Roger Bush, Pierce County and to share their views about the potential RTID projects. Pub- Bob Ferguson, King County lic meetings and open houses will be announced on the web site and via the news media. Citizens can also call or send letters; Barbara Gelman, Pierce County the telephone number and address appear below. Calvin Goings, Pierce County A draft proposal will be completed late this year or early in 2007 for public review and Larry Gossett, ling County for consideration by the RTID governing board. After it is finalized, the RTID proposal Jane Hague, King County will be considered by the three county councils. If the proposal is approved, it will go before the region's voters in November 2007. John Koster, Snohomish County Kathy Lambert, King County Regional Transportation Investment District Terry Lee, Pierce County 411 University St., Suite 1200 Dick Mud, Pierce County Seattle, WA 98101 Phillips, King County (206) 4424254 Larry www.rtid.org Kinks Sievers, Snohomish County Dave Somers, Snohomish County Peter von Reichbauer, King County Photos: WSDOT and NW-Pholos.com Roads Transit ............... Population Growth Today's traffic congestion makes getting around the Puget Sound region very difficult. Imagine what it will be like in the future —if we don't do anything —as the population increases by more than 1.2 million people over the next 25 years. ............................. Traffic Gridlock The Central Puget Sound region faces major transportation challenges. Traffic is unbearable in some areas. Many roads and bridges are inadequate, and in need of repair or replacement. We need transit investments that will move more people quickly and take some of the cars off the road. Some areas are not well served by transit. Thankfully, something is being done about ill A plan Is coming together to make roads and bridges better and safer, and to expand and improve transit services. Roads & Transit Under the banner of Roads & Transit, the region's local elected officials — together with Sound Transit, the Regional Transportation Investment District (RTID), the state Department of Transportation and the Puget Sound Regional Council — are developing a set of transportation Improvements and a plan for paying for them. Roads & Transit will call for investments in the most heavily traveled corridors and in transportation projects that can make the most difference. The idea Is to build a more integrated regional trans- portation system. Road improvements will build upon the state's recent invest- ments in our highways, continuing to improve traffic flow. Potential goad and Oddge Proj1 ?V Significant improvements would be made it, State Route .167 (Renton/Puyallup V • State Route 162 (Ortifitg)' • Proposed State Route 704 (Cross BOO E • State Route 99 (Alaskan Way.Vlsd 1J406'(Bttllevcie/G�btsidt9j,;,i • State Route 509 (Burien/Sea-Tao) • State Route 520 (Evergreen Point f§ . • Interstate 5 @ State Route 18 (Ped • US Highway 2 (East Snohomis • State Route 9 (Bothell/Snoho. • SR 524 (Maltby) • SR 527 (Mill Creek) Transit investments will include extend- ing the light rail system that is currently under construction and scheduled to open between downtown Seattle and Sea-Tac Airport in 2009. Regional express bus and commuter rail service would be improved through investments in park -and -rides, transit centers and HOV freeway access ramps. These transportation improvements will be coordinated throughout Snohomish, King, and Pierce counties to give goods and people more and better ways to move around the region. The package will be placed before voters for their consideration in November 2007. Roads & Transit Priorities • Focus Investments on most con- gested, heavily traveled corridors • Finish or leverage projects already started • Provide people with more transpor- tation choices • Improve travel times for people and freight • Integrate road and transit investments Potential Transit Projects • Light rail extensions east of Lake Washington to Bellevue and as far as Redmond, north of the UW as for as Lynnwood, and south of Sea-Tac Airport as for as the Port of Tacoma area. Improve regional express bus and commuter rail service 4 through additional park -and - rides, new HOV freeway access ramps and transit ce e�ea 1111�� ll,�� Next Steps Fall 2006/Winter 2007 • RTID and Sound Transit identify preferred investments • Independent cost review Spring 2007 Roads & Transit considered for the November 7, 2007 ballot • County Councils consider the RTID portion of the package and, if approved, place on the November ballot • Sound Transit board considers the transit portion of the package and, if approved, places on the November ballot Fall 2007 • Voters decide at November general election Roads & Transit Benefits • Faster, more predictable commute times • Better connections between the region's major centers • More vehicle and people -moving capacity on major corridors • New transportation choices • Improved safety KEY Everett Proposed(Muklkeo Underway Proposed! Edmondsd..Shorelineorthgate xitt University of wash=Mal Capitol Hill Seattle Mercer Island Rainier Valley t I Tuk1�wA SesTac ■ ei ■ Federal ■ ■ Tacoma way: . r wood nAk Renton It Sumner Puyallup 01 Lakewood '' 16 l Q) MCChWill • �•!•� an I I r6r w Fort Lewis e� Sound Transit Board Douglas MacDonald, Secretary Claudia Thomas Dave Gossett, Snohomish John Koster, Snohomish County John W. Ladenburg, Chair Washington State Department Mayor of Lakewood County Kathy Lambert, King County Pierce County EExewthre of Transportation Pole von Reichbeuer Gary Nelson, Snohomish County Terry Lee, Pierce County Connie Marshall, Vice Chair Richard Morin King County Council Dick Muri, Pierce County Bellevue City Council Edmonds City Council Mark Olson, Vice Chair Richard McIver Planning Commlftee: Larry Phillips, King County Everett City Council Seattle City Council Regional Transportation All Executive RTID Board Peter von Relchbauer, King Julie Anderson Greg Nickels Investment Distrlet members County ty Tacoma City Council Mayor of Seattle ExecLffive Boar& Doug MacDonald, Secretary of Kirke Sievers, Snohomish Mary -Alyce BCounci Julia Patterson Shawn Bunney, Pierce County Transportaton, Non -voting Chair County Kirkland City Council King County Council Chair Roger Bush, Pierce County Dave Somers, Snohomish Butler Larry Phillips King County Council Julie Patterson, King County Jane Hague, King County County Issaquah City Council Vice -Chair Bob Ferguson. King County Dow Constantine King County Council Aaron Reardon Snohomish County Executive Dow Constantine, King County Barbara Gelman, Pierce County David Enslow Ron Sims Reagan Dunn, King County Calvin Goings, Pierce County Summer City Council King County Executive Tim Farrell, Pierce County Larry Gossett, King County LA CL fa CL CL cu cc m CL O. Q0 Vol v CL Q Ol W CL W S! CU 72 0 cm 75 Z a 0 w C CL w Q CL o ki CL c 7r-: 0 %J .2 — - -0 PC cc C do : : — anj c c o E : ! .2 S.- CL cy E CL -E & a -3 CL ex O VI CC d Ln ;:z L^ cr a a uj a-, 0 76 Regional Transportation Investment District Blueprint for Progress: Moving Forward Together Proposal Presented to Sound Transit Board of Directors on January 26, 2006 Updated on July 18, 2006 I. Introduction On January 26, 2006, the Regional Transportation Investment District (RTID) presented the Blueprint for Progress: Moving Forward Together to the Sound Transit Board of Directors. This Blueprint is a proposal for investments for highways, roads, and bridges in key corridors in Pierce, King, and Snohomish Counties. The Blueprint explains the guiding assumptions underlying the proposal, includes possibilities for new boundaries and the use of transit for congestion mitigation, and describes funding sources and revenue projections that were available in January 2006. This document also includes changes necessary to implement the proposed transportation package that were submitted during the 2006 legislative session in anticipation of a 2006 vote. During the 2006 session, the Legislature enacted ESHB 2871.' This bill provided for many of the changes to the RTID statutory authority outlined below. At the same time, ESHB 2871 allows RTID and Sound Transit to pursue a vote no sooner than 2007; the legislation also requires that both ballot measures must either pass, or both will fail. Finally, the legislation requires RTID to "develop and include in the regional transportation investment plan a funding proposal for the state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV project that assures full project funding for seismic safety and corridor connectivity on state route number 520 between Interstate 5 and Interstate 405." Given these changes, RTID staff are currently evaluating how to proceed. However, the original Blueprint remains the template from which we are starting and is provided below for reference. 'See http: `/apps.lee wa ,lovlbillinfo%suintnar\,aanxweai=2006&bill=2871 for more information about ESHB 2871. II. Key Elements of Blueprint for Progress Key elements of this proposal include the following: • Targeting investments by corridor to integrate roads and transit investments; • Keeping the investments affordable: this proposal would cost each household from approximately $8-10 per month, or from $100-120 per year, and retain 100% of the money raised in our three county area; • Modifying the RTID and Sound Transit boundaries to be the same boundaries; • Reducing RTID's reliance on the sales tax and placing primary reliance on the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) to provide a funding package; • Planning for transit to assist in traffic flow as an eligible investment for RTID funding to provide construction traffic impact mitigation. BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, 1/26/06 - 2 - III. Guiding Principles These principles represent the core thinking about the roads component of a regional roads and transit package. They are combined from RTID statutory requirements, the Chair's Proposal (April 2006), and the original Blueprint (January 2006). This list in this form was presented to the RTID Executive Board on May 31, 2006 for its consideration. 1. Build Off Existing State Investments in Key Areas: a. Areas where value of existing state investments can be significantly increased by completing additional improvements in that corridor, and b. Important time sensitive corridor improvements that were not funded or not adequately funded by state funding investments. 2. Prioritize Regional Investments into Critical Corridors and Key Investments: a. The region's needs exceed our ability to fund all projects at the same time. b. Focus on corridors and investments within those corridors to reduce congestion and improve safety, improve travel time, increase daily and peak person and vehicle trip capacity, reduce person and trip delay, and improve air quality. c. Improve freight mobility. d. Projects must be in the Puget Sound Regional Council's Destination 2030 Plan. e. Maintain flexibility to adapt over time by leaving some funding unallocated. 3. Create an Integrated Regional Transportation Plan that Includes Both Roads and Transit Together: a. Build off successful examples of combined road and transit packages from San Diego, Denver, and Vancouver, B.C. b. Review project phasing, staging to maximize reliability, certainty of region's transportation system while minimizing disruption during construction. c. Demonstrate to our voters that we have a unified regional transportation plan that makes sense and is affordable. 4. Keep Road and Transit Package Affordable: a. Ensure that investments are cost effective b. Limit revenue sources c. Integrate roads/transit package d. Minimize bonding e. Focus on cash flow over twenty year period BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, I/26/06 - 3 - IV. Proposed Investment Strategy and Plan A. Introduction The proposal assumes targeted investments in major regional corridors. Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) staff, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and local government transportation planners provided traffic flow and origin and destination data that were used to help identify investments with the greatest congestion relief benefit. WSDOT staff helped analyze the previous Regional Transportation Investment District (RTID) project list to factor in the new project funding from the 2005 legislative package, the Transportation Partnership Act (TPA). The TPA investments helped drive where regional dollars would be the next logical investment. Some projects were also removed from consideration because the TPA fully funded the project. For example, TPA and previous state gas tax funds will complete the northern segment of the Pierce County HOV lanes originally included in the RTID project list. Other factors considered include construction impacts from the TPA and nickel projects, early Sound Transit Phase 2 planning, and other transit plans. Project costs are based on the most recent cost review information made available to RTID and will need to be updated. These cost numbers were initially developed through the cost review process in 2004. Not all projects in this proposal have been aged according to a construction -sequencing plan. In addition, project costs do not reflect any cost updates completed by WSDOT in late December 2005. Further project cost updates, scope verifications, and a financing plan would need to be developed with the WSDOT during the public process and before a public vote. In addition, the RTID statute requires that all projects undergo an independent cost review. The 2004 cost review would need to be updated using the same independent review process. B. District Boundary Modifications Combining the RTID and Sound Transit boundaries is a key element for success of a combined transit and road proposal. In both King and Pierce Counties, the Sound Transit boundaries largely encompass the needed transportation improvements. For King and Pierce Counties, the proposal would be to utilize the existing Sound Transit boundary. Snohomish County presents a different challenge because the existing Sound Transit boundary only covers the southwest urban growth areas (as far north as Everett) and leaves out much of the north and east portions of the county. Many of the road projects in Snohomish County are located outside of the present Sound Transit boundary. Three major Highways of Statewide Significance (State Routes 9 and 522, and US 2) would fall outside the boundary. Several projects in the north would also be outside of the existing Sound Transit boundary. In addition, current local transit services are outside the current Sound Transit boundary. The proposal to resolve these issues is to expand the Sound Transit boundary and contract the RTID boundary into one composite boundary for the joint package. The following guidelines were used in developing the new boundary proposal: 1. Include projects within the 1-5 Snohomish Corridor Action Plan (SNOCAP). This includes both the I-5 and SR 9 corridors from the King County line to Arlington. BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, 1/26/06 - 4 - 2. Include the adjoining Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) along the SNOCAP corridor, i.e. I-5 and SR 9. 3. Consider existing transit service areas or major routes within Snohomish County for inclusion in the new composite boundary. 4. Explore inclusion of the Tulalip Reservation within the new boundary due to recent and continuing economic development. 5. Explore eligibility concepts for including HSS routes that fall outside the boundary such as SR 2 and SR 522. Applying these guidelines results in a Sound Transit/RTID service area bounded by King County to the south, Puget Sound to the west, SR 9 (and associated UGAs) to the east, and Arlington to the north. It would allow a system approach to include not only roads and local transit projects, but also Sound Transit Phase 2 projects. This would allow development of one multi -modal system within one boundary serving the primary growth areas described in Snohomish County's recently completed 20 year comprehensive plan. The dual backbone of the transportation network within this new boundary consists of I-5 and SR 9, the two major north - south and heavily used transportation corridors. This boundary is an initial proposal and may require refinements based on further analysis. C. Transit Operations to Mitigate Construction Traffic Impacts This proposal recommends providing for transit operating costs to local transit agencies as a means of providing traffic mitigation during construction of the mega projects. Funds might be used for bus, vanpool, and/or transportation demand management, including service hours. Mitigation plans would be developed as construction planning is undertaken. This will require a change in the existing RTID statute. In addition, the proposal for a joint Sound Transit and RTID ballot will allow the voters to see the integration of road and transit investments throughout the region. BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, 1/26/06 - 5 - ass D. Targeted Investments in Pierce County 1. Transportation Needs The economic well-being of Pierce County is inextricably linked with its highways. Almost 30% of Pierce County's residents commute to jobs in King County. By 2020, Pierce County's population will increase by more than an additional 200,000 people. The proposed RTID investments seek to link Pierce County's "jobs highways" so workers and products have freedom of movement throughout the region. 2. Corridor Investments State Route 167: The key project in Pierce County would provide a new north -south corridor as an alternative route to I-5 by connecting SR 167 between SR 509 in the City of Tacoma and the existing SR 167 at Puyallup. This connection would allow commuters direct access from the City of Tacoma to SR 167 as an alternative route to I-5 and would improve freight mobility and access to the 4" largest warehouse, distribution and manufacturing center in the United States — the Valley Cities area, which includes the Pierce County cities of Fife, Puyallup, Sumner, Algona, Pacific and Auburn and the King County portion of Auburn, Kent, Renton and Tukwila— from the Port of Tacoma. This project would help accommodate expansion at the Port and drive economic development. The project configuration is currently being refined by WSDOT and local governments. The proposed investment would allow purchase of the right of way, critical to the long-term viability of this corridor, and make an investment in this corridor that could be augmented overtime. State Route 162: This project would help provide congestion relief for the more than 400,000 people who live in Eastern Pierce County by adding capacity to SR 162 in the vicinity of Sumner and Orting. Significant improvements would be made to critical interchanges. State Route 704 (Cross Base Highway): Construction of the new State Route 704 would provide a critical east -west corridor link from I-5 to south central Pierce County. This will help reduce congestion on SR 512 by improving linkage to I-5 through McChord Air Force Base and Fort Lewis properties. This project would provide economic benefits to the region by improving access from I-5 to manufacturing facilities in Frederickson, the largest manufacturing and industrial site with land available in the region. Additional Investments and Contingency: Funding is included for additional targeted investments and a contingency fund if needed. An example of an additional investment would be the direct access off -ramp from I-5 to 381" Street. 3. Summary Table of Investments in Pierce County Project Name* RTID Funding Share millions SR 167 1,000 SR 162 180 Cross Base Highway (SR 704) 210 Additional lnvestments and Contingency 104 Total 1,494 * Project scope to be finalized by WSDOT. BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, 1/26/06 - 6 - E. Targeted Investments in King County 1. Transportation Needs King County's population is the 121h largest county population in the United States, and is expected to grow by more than 1/3 by 2010. Population growth is occurring more rapidly in the suburban areas than the urban areas and leading to heavily congested roads. At the same time, King County and the region's economy depends on a number of large and expanding employment centers as well as the Port of Seattle and the 4th largest warehousing, distribution and manufacturing district in the United States (the Valley Cities area, which includes the Pierce County cities of Fife, Puyallup, Sumner, Algona, Pacific and Auburn and the King County portion of Auburn, Kent, Renton and Tukwila). Severe congestion problems hamper both commuters and freight mobility. In addition, some of our most critical infrastructure is unsafe and needs to be repaired. Proposed investments in King County are targeted at six main corridors: I-5, I-405, SR 167, SR 520, SR 509, and SR 99 and the Alaska Way Viaduct. These investments will help improve traffic flow throughout the region and address critical safety concerns. 2. Corridor Investments SR 167: State Route 167 serves one of the fastest growing areas of King County, but suffers from more than six hours of congestion a day. Improvements in this corridor would provide commuters better access to affordable housing and employment centers and will expand freight mobility to the Valley Cities warehousing district. The scope of this project includes HOV improvements within the King County section of SR 167 and targeted general-purpose improvements at chokepoints. This investment builds upon funding designated by the Legislature in the 2005 session. I-5/ SR 509: Improvements of I-5 and SR 509 would provide a direct southern access point to SeaTac Airport, increase freight mobility out of the Port of Seattle directly to the Kent Valley, and improve a critical chokepoint on I-5 by adding general purpose lanes to I-5 and decreasing truck traffic on our most important north -south corridor (I-5) between the port/industrial area and destinations south of the airport. This project is ready to proceed to construction. Right of way costs are escalating due to development pressures. This project would create an alternative for people driving I-5 to and from Seattle from the south. Truck freight would use this corridor as an alternative to I-5. This proposal would build a new six -lane freeway between I-5 and S. 188th Street in SeaTac. This project would include HOV lanes and provide a key transit connection to the SeaTac International Airport from the south. This project would also construct six miles of improvements on I-5 from S. 320th in Federal Way to S. 200th. New I-5 lanes would be configured to provide one new lane north bound and two new lanes south bound. This project would also connect the airport's south access expressway to SR 509 and I-5. I-405: The I-405 corridor has realized a 200% increase in traffic congestion over the last 10 years. It leads the region in daily hours of congestion, with more than 50% of the day in gridlock. The cost of delays, livability and air quality degradation are clear impacts. Recent state packages funded key projects designed to relieve the corridor's worst bottlenecks, but additional funding is needed complete the missing links. The southern section of I-405 from 1-90 to 1-5 is the worst congested roadway in the State of Washington. Approximately 18,000 cars per day stay on I-5 and contribute to congestion on BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, 1/26/06 - 7 - the I-90 and 520 bridges rather than face lengthy delays on south I-405. This corridor's currently incomplete configuration contributes significantly to the congestion in this critical alternative to I-5. In 2020, approximately 380,900 people are expected to travel through this segment of the corridor in 274,800 vehicles. Clearly, existing capacity constraints will grow more acute over time. This project would help fill these gaps and provide a consistent number of lanes in these critical sections. This investment of $1.3 billion in I-405 would provide additional lanes in each direction from SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway) to I-90. This improvement would reduce 2020 congestion between Renton and 1-90 by more than four hours per day while serving much higher traffic volumes. In addition, targeted improvements would be made in Bellevue between SR 520 and I- 90 and elsewhere to complement the TPA and Nickel investments underway by the state. SR 520: This proposal would provide $800 million in regional funds toward replacing the seismic and storm -vulnerable existing Evergreen Point Floating Bridge from the east shore of Lake Washington to the Montlake touchdown. This strategy would preserve a critical link in our transportation system. Regional funding would be combined with tolls and state funds to provide a new structure. This funding is an insurance policy to ensure that the bridge span's critical infrastructure can be replaced or augmented up to 6-lanes. SR 99 and the Alaskan Way Viaduct: This proposal would provide assurance that the preferred tunnel option to replace the existing viaduct structure would be funded. This proposal recognizes funding from the City of Seattle, Port of Seattle and federal government together with the state and regional funding. Based on the project description developed in April 2004, this project would construct a new six lane facility. The cost estimate is based on replacing the existing viaduct and Seattle's central waterfront seawall with a new six lane tunnel, with a connection to an improved Battery Street Tunnel. Corridor performance would be enhanced with the additional shoulder and safety improvements made. I-5 and Federal Way Triangle: The proposed RTID funds would complete this interchange, currently rated as the fifth most congested freeway chokepoint in the state and the site of numerous accidents. Freight traffic to and from the Port of Tacoma uses this access to SR 18 and SR 161. Additional Investments and Contingency: This is included to allow for revenue -forecast adjustments and other regional needs. Other regional needs under discussion include SR 518, the South Park Bridge, Mercer Street, the Spokane Street Viaduct, and other regional arterials. 3. Summary Table of Investments in King County Project Name Proposed RTID Investments in millions)* SR 99: Alaska Way Viaduct 800 1-405 1,330 SR 520 Bride 800 I-5 Improvements and SR 509 Extension 870 SR 167 420 1-5 Improvements at SR 18 (Federal Way Triangle) 50 Additional Investments and Contingency 237 Total 4,507 * Project Scope to be finalized by WSDOT. BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, 1/26/06 - 8 - F. Targeted Investments in Snohomish County 1. Transportation Needs Snohomish County is in the midst of addressing a high rate of growth and congestion problems, especially as area residents commute across the County to and from work: Between 1990 and 2000, Snohomish County's population grew by 30.1 %--the fastest among the four central Puget Sound counties. • Approximately 40% of Snohomish County's 300,000 workers commute outside of the county every day, with most traveling to King County (34.4%). Approximately 20% of workers in Snohomish County commute from other counties. The Snohomish County economy is forecasted to grow 20% between 1998 and 2010, adding 44,755 new jobs. Current projections show that most growth is expected to occur in the southwest portion of the county (Everett, Lynnwood, and Bothell.) All three are designated "Regional Centers" by the Puget Sound Regional Council. Transportation is a key issue for Snohomish County employers. Snohomish County has an "unusually high share" of its total employment in the manufacturing industry, with employment levels in 2001 at 25% as compared to 7% in King only and 6% nationwide. This county is within one of the top ten biotechnology regions in the nation. Commuting alternatives are critical to ensure that the local workforce can reliably get to work on time. 2. Proposed Investments Snohomish County's proposed investments would fund a diverse mix of projects that enhance current transportation investments. Over the past four years, the Snohomish County agencies have worked cooperatively to develop this prioritized list that addresses congestion along key state highway corridors, critical city and county arterial streets, and improvements to multimodal transportation including park & ride lots and ferry terminals. As the RTID has been evolving, the project list is being modified to reflect changed scopes and costs, completed projects, and choices to reflect anticipated lower revenues. The proposed investments would continue to build on the current investments by focusing over significant funding along key state highway corridors of SR 9 and US 2. In addition, $100 million would complete five arterial street projects in Everett, Marysville, Edmonds, Lynnwood, Bothell, and Snohomish County. Approximately $170 million is earmarked to support transit -related projects, including continued investment in the Edmonds Multimodal Terminal. The specific Snohomish County investments include the projects contained in the table below. BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, 1/26/06 - 9 - 3. Proposed Investments in Snohomish County Funding Project Name Project Description Proposal (millions) Improvements to Key North/South Routes, Interchanges and Access Roads to 1-5 and SR 9 I-5 and US 2 Trestle Helps alleviate traffic chokepoint on I-5 by modifying I-5/ US 2 intersections and 412.3 widening US 2. Addresses major safety concerns and improves water quality. Everett Arterial Access Improvements to Everett Arterial Access at I-5/US 2 to increase mobility in 28.9 Improvements at I-51US 2 downtown Everett for general use and transit access. Reduces congestion and improves safety from users accessing I-5 and US 2. 116 St. NE: I-5 to State St. Adds capacity and improves safety along east -west corridor with access to 2.1 growing industrial and commercial areas; improves local/regional transit accessibilit . 44"' Ave. W: I-5 to 194a' Project constructs a new northbound lane on 44th Ave. W from 200th St. SW to 0.5 St. SW 196th St. SW to add capacity to accommodate both the existing heavy northbound flow of traffic exiting I-5 at 44th Ave. W and the traffic that would be generated from Lynnwood city center development. SR 9 Improves alternative route to I-5 by widening SR 9 from 176'n St. SE to SR 92 325.0 from two lanes to four/five lanes with access control. Includes improvements to various intersections. Improvements to Key East/West Corridors 20"' St. SE: US 2 and SR 9 Widens 20'h St. SE between US 2 to SR 9 to improve commuter access, reduce 34.9 Connection bottleneck conditions at 20`s and SR 9, help resolve development concurrency issues that limit economic development, increases safety for school buses and transit by improving corridor. SR 524: 20 Ave. W to SR Significantly expands vital east -west link between Lynnwood and Bothell, 71.8 527 improves freight mobility to and from the Bothell/ Canyon Park technology corridor along SR 524; enhances multi -modal access for transit, bicycle, pedestrian. 112"' St. SW: 1-5 to SR 527 Widening of 112'h St. SW to better connect I-5 and SR 527 to reduce congestion 3.0 to Everett's Paine Field; promote freight mobility along three major north -south corridors (SR 525, SR 99, Airport Road); augments local trail system; upgrades local water quality detention features and restores streamflows. SR 531: 43 Ave. NE to 67 Decreases cbokepoint between SR 9 and I-5 south of Arlington. 41.4 Ave. NE 238" St SW from 84`h Ave. Improves connection between SR 104 and SR 99; adds capacity and reduces 2.2 W to SR 104 safety concerns. 196 St. SW (SR 524) from Widens road to increase access to I-5 and decrease traffic chokepoint in 11.8 48 Ave. W to 37 Ave. W Lynnwood. HSS & HSS Approaches Total 933.9 Local Projects (Non -Highways of Statewide Significance) 41s' St. 1-5 Overcrossing/ Provides the second of a two-phase project to eliminate the at -grade BNSF 7.6 Lowell River Rd BNSF RR mainline railway crossings at 36th St. and Lowell River Road along Everett's Overcrossing Snohomish Riverfront area. The project will enhance the safety and operational efficiency of one of the few east -west arterial routes across the Snohomish Valley. 80' Ave. W: 212 St. SW to Improves safety for pedestrians, school children, park users, bicyclists, and auto 8.7 238 St. SW users. BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, 1/26/06 - 10 Airport Way: SR 9 to Br #1 Widens roadway to improve capacity on county arterial and access to City of 8.7 Snohomish area. East Everett Overcrossing Constructs a grade separation overcrossing to extend Everett Ave. over the BNSF 10.0 Canadian Line to facilitate freight movement and traffic. 39/35 Ave SE: 240 St. SE Constructs new county and city arterial missing link and widens existing county 57.1 to Seattle Hill Rd arterial road to reduce congestion, provide alternative route to SR 527 and SR 9 from Bothell north towards Mill Creek, and increase safety by adding sidewalks and bike lanes. State Ave.: 136 St. NE to Improves key north/south arterial parallel to I-5 near Marysville to meet 3.6 152 ST NE necessary levels of service, decrease burden on 1-5, and increase freight throughput. 36/35 Ave. W: Maple Rd. Widens county arterial and city street to reduce congestion, provide safe 11.0 to 148 St. SW pedestrian and bicycle movement and improve access into Lynnwood Non HSS Total 106.7 HOV and Transit I-5 Mountlake Terrace Build enhanced transit hub for I-5 interchange; relieves overcrowded park and 2.0 Commuter Parking Lot rides in Snohomish County; expands transit access and safety. Expansion SR 525 Mukilteo Park & Construct a park and ride facility along SR525 in the Harbour Pointe vicinity to 6.7 Ride Lot meet transit parking demand for Community Transit commuter services. Facility will increase transit mode share and reduce congestion on SR525 and 1-5 between Mukilteo and Seattle. Edmonds (SR 104) Integrates ferry, commuter and intercity rail, bus transit, carpool/automobile/ 123.4 Multimodal Terminal pedestrian/bicycle traffic into single complex. Relocates existing state ferry terminal and realigns SR 104 to create grade separation, increase safety, and decrease vehicle queuing along SR 104. BusNan Fleet Expansion Procure buses and commuter vans to increase the levels of transit and vanpool 14.3 service in the 1-5 and I-405 corridors between Snohomish and King counties. North County (I-5, SR 2, Program to design and construct 800 new park and ride stalls along state and 21.4 SR 9) Park & Ride interstate routes to address 2015 transit parking demand in North Snohomish Facilities I County. HOV & Transit Total 167.8 Proposed RTID Investment i,208.4* Summary of Proposed Investments in Snohomish County Project Type RT. D Funding Share in millions* -Highways of Statewide Significances & Approaches 933.9 Non HSS projects 106.7 HOV and Transit 167.8 Total 1 1208.4* * The amount of revenue generated in Snohomish County under this proposal would exceed $ 1 billion, but additional work is needed to develop a good estimate of how much additional revenue there would be. The total revenue from within new district boundary lines could be sufficient to support this level of investment. In the event that the revenue generated is less, this project list would be modified. BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, 1/26/06 - 11 - B. Household Costs The revenue proposal is estimated to have the following household costs: County Median Household Income (2004)* 0.6% MVET 0.1% Sales Tax** Total Household Cost by County*** Pierce 52,630-53,937 $86.00 $21.00 $107 King 58,938-59,718 $86.00 $21.00 $107 Snohomish 58,389-59,022 $86.00 $21.00 $107 *Median Household Income Estimates by County: 1989 to 2004 and Projection for 2005, from Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM), October 2005. This table contains estimates of median household income by county in current dollars; series revised 1990 forward. The estimation relies on both 1990 and 2000 census data. These estimates are based on past relationships between available indicator data and median household income. Tile estimates shown may differ from other median household income data developed from the Office of Financial Management's State Population Survey, Bureau of the Census surveys, or other sources. Survey data, which are subject to sampling variability and bias, are not necessarily more correct than the estimate data. For small counties, the estimated series may show large variations during certain periods. Note: Household income figures differ among federal and state agencies that collect these data. The U.S. Census, Housing and Urban Development, and OFM each differ in their estimate of median income. This analysis is based on OFM figures since RTID is authorized by the State of Washington. **This figure would be lower if the federal tax deduction for state sales tax (authorized through 2005) is extended. *** Other methodologies produce an estimated cost from between $100 and $120/year. C. Summary of Proposed Investments by County County Project Type Funding Share in millions* Pierce SR 167 1,000 SR 162 180 SR 704 (Cross Base Highway) 210 Additional Investments and Contingency 104 Proposed Investment in Pierce County 1,494 King SR 99: Alaska Way Viaduct 800 I-405 1,330 SR 520 Bride 800 I-5 Improvements and SR 509 Extension 870 SR 167 420 I-5 Improvement-, at SR 18 (Federal Way Triangle) 50 Additional Investments and Contingency 237 Proposed Investment in King County 4,507 Snohomish Highway,-, of Statewide Significances & Approaches 933.9 Non HSS projects 106.7 HOV and Transit 167.8 Proposed Investment in Snohomish County 1208.4* Total Proposed Investment 7,209.4 * The amount of revenue generated in Snohomish County under this proposal would exceed the $1.065 billion listed above, but additional work is needed to develop a good estimate of how much additional revenue would be generated from within a new boundary line. The total revenue from within new district boundary lines could be sufficient to support this level of investment. In the event that the revenue generated is less, this project list would be modified. BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, 1/26/06 - 13 - VI. RTID Legislative Proposal To achieve the proposal outlined in the Blueprint ,for Progress, the following legislative changes were submitted during the 2006 Legislative Session. Some, but not all, were adopted by ESHB 287E 1. Allow RTID to change its boundaries to be consistent with Sound Transit, and allow Sound Transit to expand or modify its boundaries in conjunction with the vote. 2. Simplify joint ballot procedures and provide for the option of a single combined ballot 3. Allow system -wide tolling, including the SR 520 Bridge, and clarify tolling provisions. 4. Allow RTID to fund transit operations for construction mitigation. 5. Allow ballot title to be longer than currently limited by state law or create ballot title template. 6. Eliminate current restrictions on use of MVET funding. 7. Increase maximum MVET authority. The maximum limit should be up to 0.6% under current valuation methods, or up to 0.8% if new valuation methods are adopted by the legislature. 8. Modify bonding authority to allow state backed bonds for state projects. 9. Reduce local match requirement. 10. Do not prohibit a 2006 election. In addition, the proposal is to allow corridor and project investments to go to the voters and then address long-term governance questions. BLUEPRINT FOR PROGRESS, 1/26/06 - 14 - Budget 2007 Of AIF��9 CITY OF MEDINA City Manager's Office 501 Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 425.233.6400 www.medina-wa.gov October 27, 2006 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers City of Medina, Washington This document presents the overall plan for allocating City resources to the variety of programs necessary to protect the community's physical security, enhance the quality of life, natural resources, and to maintain and develop the City's facilities and infrastructure. The 2007 budget reflects the vision of the public officials and provides the resources necessary to deliver services. Those of us who work on behalf of the people of the city of Medina are confident that we are meeting the challenge of balancing the needs of the citizenry with available resources. Through our commitment to the future and pride in our past accomplishments, we present to you the 2007 budget. The City of Medina is fortunate to have built solid reserves through a combination of favorable economic conditions and prudent financial management during the past decade. The City has controlled budgetary growth while, at the same time, met the significant increase in the demand for services resulting from redevelopment activity within the community. Poor performance of the economy and lost revenue as a result of voter -approved initiatives during the period of 1999 — 2003 required implementation of short and long-term financial planning strategies to preserve the City's financial stability. Information on the significant changes or issues from 2006 to 2007 has been included in this budget message. Specifically, information is provided on the budget in relation to the Council's original budget directives; the process used in constructing the 2007 Budget; adoption of the budget by the Council; summary of the major operating funds of the City; capital projects; personnel proposals; and the City's financial condition. Original Council 2007 Budget Directives • The City Council desires no property tax increase programmed into the 2007 Budget (modified by the City Council during the budget process to a property tax levy increase of new construction only). • The City Council desires to limit operating expenditure growth to not more than four percent above the 2006 Budget. • The City Council is willing to use reserves, if needed, to balance the City's budget in 2007 in order to maintain current service levels. 1 Budget 2007 • The City Council desires to include funding in the 2007 Budget to complete proposed projects within the adopted Capital Improvement Program. The City Council desires to review an updated staff/consultant cost analysis to be provided by the City Manager. The City Manager will also address staff/consultant issues as they relate to space needs. The budget maintains current service levels and is balanced by use of approximately $600,329 from 2006 carryover funds. The budget includes an increase of 0.01 percent in the property tax levy for 2007, which is generated entirely from new construction. The 2007 budget includes funding to complete the capital projects identified in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which is funded entirely by Real Estate Excise Taxes (REET). ORGANIZATION OF THE BUDGET The budget document is organized to focus on financial data at a meaningful level of summary and detail while explaining City operations and policies. The 2007 Budget document first presents a summary of all funds with a comparison to the previous four years (2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006). The next section of the budget provides more detailed information regarding revenues and expenditures of each fund and department. Specific presentation requirements for the budget are prescribed by State law. For example, the revenue section must provide comparative information for each fund, including the actual receipts for the last completed fiscal period, the estimated receipts for the current fiscal period, and the estimated receipts for the ensuing year. Similar requirements exist for the expenditure section of the budget. PROCESS The 2007 Budget process began in February 2006, with the completion of the 2005 Year End Financial Statements. The City also conducted a citizen survey, which provided input and feedback on a number of City services and programs to help guide the City Council's budget policy directives and the budget. Finally, goals and policies developed previously to guide the development of the budget were updated and used in the development of the 2007 Budget. In August, the Department Directors were asked to submit budget requests. Department Directors were informed of the City Council's budget policy directives and were further requested to hold requests for increases in discretionary spending to less than one -percent. The draft preliminary budget, as requested by each of the City's Department Directors, was compiled and submitted to the City Manager for review in September. During the month of September, the City Manager works with the department directors to refine and, in most cases, reduce expenditure requests for the budget in recognition of Council's budget directives, service demands, and the City's long-term financial situation. A majority of the budget discussions focused on the two main operating funds of the City: the General Fund and the Street Fund. The preliminary expenditure budget for the General Fund was approximately $700,000 below projected revenues. The Street Fund preliminary expenditure budget exceeded projected revenues by $350,000. Consistent with the Council's budget directives, use of 2006 General Fund surplus revenue was recommended to balance the Street Fund budget. Z Budget 2007 Adoption of the Budget by Council The 2007 Preliminary Budget was submitted to Council on October 31, 2006. The City Council must hold two public hearings on the proposed budget, which are scheduled for November 13 and December 11, 2006, as well as three Council Study Sessions. Based on the public hearings and budget meetings, the Council will consider adopting the proposed budget as submitted or with modifications. MAJOR FUNDS The 2007 Budget is balanced in all funds and totals $6,308,224. The budget can be divided into the following two components: Operating Funds and Capital Improvement Funds. Operating Funds The City's General Fund, which supports the majority of municipal operating services, includes revenue of $4,716,920 and expenditures of $4,267,724 for 2007. The General Fund revenues include an increase in the property tax levy of less than one -tenth of one percent in 2007. The General Fund budget does not include any significant one-time revenues, which typically come in the form of grants or development revenues. The 2007 Budget includes approximately $600,000 in one-time expenditures, which is approximately 14 percent of the City's General Fund budget. Some of the significant one-time supplemental expenditures include the following: $271,283 Transfer to the Street Fund $250,000 Transfer to the Retiree Medical Fund $ 80,000 Transfer to the Equipment Replacement Fund The 2007 Budget includes $4,717,000 of on -going or recurring revenue compared to $4,268,000 of on- going expenses. Expenditure increases are primarily due to on -going salaries and benefits associated with existing personnel, which increased 9.4% over the 2006 budget. Approximately 45% of the salaries and benefits increase is directly attributable to the proposal to add the building official to the authorized City staff positions rather than continue to provide the services through a contract employee. Salaries and benefits, excluding the building official position, are budgeted to increase by 5% in 2007. The other operational expenditures have generally been held to their 2006 budget level, increasing by less than 1 %. The most significant newly -requested ongoing supplemental expenditures include: $ 18,100 I.T. support for police dispatch/records systems expense increase $ 5,000 Jail Services expense increase $ 5,000 Mercer Island Marine Patrol contract expense increase $ 17,200 Bellevue Fire Protection contract fee expense increase The Street Fund and the Equipment Replacement Fund contain the major remaining operating revenue and expenditures. Neither fund generates sufficient revenues to support its current expenses so the budget includes a transfer of $271,283 from the General Fund to the Street Fund and $80,000 from the General Fund to the Equipment Replacement Fund. The Street Fund includes $73,400 in revenue (excluding the transfer from the General Fund) and $489,000 in expenditures within the budget. The Street Fund is projected to have an ending balance of $0. 3 Budget 2007 The Equipment Replacement Fund includes $2,500 in revenue, plus an $80,000 contribution from the General Fund, which offsets the $115,000 in expenditures for 2007. The current policy is for the Equipment Replacement Fund to include annual contributions equivalent to the depreciation cost of equipment ($1,000 value and greater) on a straight-line basis over the life of the equipment. This approach ensures available funding in the future for replacement of existing equipment and vehicles. Capital Funds The total Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for 2007 is $1,372,000. The CIP includes projects over $10,000 in cost such as, buildings, land acquisition, park facilities, street projects, surface water drainage projects, and sidewalk improvements. All of the capital improvement activity within the CIP and within the 2007 budget is funded through contributions for the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) and attainment of grants. The following are highlights from the adopted CIP as it pertains to the 2007 budget. ■ Pavement overlays, restoration, and management activities of City streets ($70,000) o N.E. 16t' Street ■ Installation and replacement of concrete curbs and sidewalks ($15,000) ■ Upgrade and repair storm drainage system ($100,000) o Sub -basin ZoneE-1 outfall (Overtake Drive West to Lake Washington) o Sub -basin Zone E-3 outfall (Overtake Drive West to Lake Washington) o Sub -basin Zone B-2 outfall (78"' Place to Lake Washington) ■ Medina Beach Park restoration and replacement of bulkhead, piers, and jetty with required mitigation ($637,000). Project carried over from 2006 pending issuance of permit from Army COE. ■ City Hall Facility Repairs/improvements ($550,000) o Repairs and upgrades identified by 2006 building assessment o Addition to north end of structure 0 Budget 2007 The following table summarizes the revenue and expenditure data for the City's Capital Fund within the 2007 budget. CITY CAPITAL FUNDS 01 /01 /2007 Fund Balance $1,735,612 Revenue Real Estate Excise Tax $ 900,000 Total Sources $2,635,612 Expenditures Road Improvements $70,000 Sidewalk Construction $15,000 Surface Water Drainage Improvements $100,000 Park Improvements $637,000 City Hall Facility Improvements $550,000 Total Uses $1,372,000 12/31/2007 Fund Balance $1,263,612 PERSONNEL The 2007 Budget includes new funding for 1.0 fulltime equivalent building official position, which eliminates the professional services contract building official and reduces expenditures for this service by $70,OOO annually. If building activity declines in the future, the building official will be able to take on building inspection responsibilities, which will result in additional expenditure reductions. However, there is no indication that the permit activity will decrease in the foreseeable future. No other increases or decreases of staff have been included in the 2007 budget. OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION The City's current financial condition continues to be excellent. The City's reserve fund is approximately 40 percent ($1.78 million) going into 2007. Most municipalities are advised to carry a minimum of 10 percent of General Fund reserves in their budget to accommodate minor modifications in revenue or expenditures that might occur during any given year. The City of Medina has been able to exceed this minimum and has built up its reserve over the past ten years for future financial stability. Property taxes typically account for the majority of the revenues received by the City each year. In 2007, property taxes will provide thirty-eight percent of the total revenues. Sales tax and permit revenues will provide thirty-one percent of the total annual revenues. The City's dependence on these three primary revenue sources, property tax, sales tax and permit fees, has became much more of a concern after the voter -approved property tax levy limitation (Initiative No. 747). At some point in the future, consideration should be given to diversifying the City's revenue sources to ensure financial stability in the future. R Budget 2007 Total resources required for delivery of the services and programs proposed for 2007 is $6.3 million. The majority of the revenues will be allocated to the Operating Funds, which provide the basic City services of police, fire and medical services, park and street maintenance, planning, building inspections and administrative services. The Capital Projects Fund will require approximately 22% of the 2007 total revenues. CITY SERVICES The 2007 Budget provides for services in support of the City Council's Budget Directives, Policy Focus Areas, and Goals that have been created to guide the development of the budget process and City operations. Readers are encouraged to review these Directives, Policy Focus Areas and Goals as well as the individual department work programs to gain a detailed understanding of the services the City will be providing through the 2007 Budget. Public safety services require approximately 40% of the financial resources of the City. The provision of law enforcement services by the Police Department accounts for approximately one-third of the General Fund expenditures or $1,497,586. The Police Department budget provides for patrol and response 24- hours a day, 365 days per year, marine patrol services, investigation, public education and community services that are typically not provided in most communities. The Police Department is also responsible for implementation and coordination of the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. In 2007, the Police Department will have an authorized staffing level of 9 sworn personnel and two civilian staff. All sworn personnel, except the Police Chief, are involved in patrol and response to calls on a regular basis. The Police Chief primarily serves as a Departmental manager, but frequently supports patrol and investigation activities. Fire protection and Medical Aid services are provided through a contract with the City of Bellevue and account for 14% of the General Fund expenditures. The Public Works Department consists of two divisions, Maintenance and Engineering. There are five fulltime employees and three seasonal employees in the department. The Maintenance Division is responsible for park, street, public facilities and public area maintenance throughout Medina. The Maintenance staff is also responsible for maintenance of the landscaping strips located along N.E. 8th Street, 82°d Avenue N.E., Overlake Drive West, 80`h Avenue N.E. and N.E. 241h Street. The Engineering Division is responsible for development review, capital improvement planning and construction, mapping and transportation issues. The majority of the work is performed by consultants. The Development Services Department consists of two divisions: Planning and Building. The 2007 Budget includes funding for three fulltime employees and four consultants in the department. The Planning Division continues to operate with a very heavy workload. The Planning Division provides land use permit application review services as well as long range city planning services, such as, comprehensive plan and zoning code updates. The Planning Division also provides urban planning support to the City Council, City staff and Planning Commission. The Department Director is a full-time city staff position and is supported by a Hearings Examiner, Planning Consultant, Engineering Consultant and Landscape Consultant. The Building Division also continues to operate with a very heavy workload. The 2007 Budget will eliminate the consultant Building Official and replace it with a staff Building Official 10 Budget 2007 position, which will result in an annual savings of approximately $70,000. The Building Inspector services will continue to be provided by a consultant to the City. In addition to the Building Official the Building Division staff includes a full-time Development Services Coordinator. The Support Services Department consists of five divisions: Legislative, Executive, Finance, Central Services and Information Technology. The City staff involved with support services include the Finance Officer, City Clerk, Administrative Assistant and Information System Coordinator. The Finance Department is responsible for accounting, payroll, purchasing, and human resources. Central Services is a combination of the City Clerk's Office and Interdepartmental functions. This Department is responsible for all public notices, newsletter publication, agenda coordination, reception services, City office and operating supplies, and records management. 2007 Expenditures By Department Legislative Executive 1 % 3% Finance Public Works 2% Legal 19% 5% Central Development Services Services �w 10% 14 % Police Fire 33%° 13% Property Tax Levy and City Tax Rate The property tax levy required to support the services and programs for 2007 is $2,170,000. This levy will result in a decrease to the tax rate for property within the city of Medina. The property tax levy is an increase of $22,390 over the 2006 levy. This levy is increase is entirely generated by new construction. The property tax rate is one of two key elements that determine how much property tax an individual property will pay in any given year. The second key element is the assessed valuation of the property, which is set by the King County Assessor. The City has no control over the assessed valuation of property and, very little impact on the property tax rate since the tax rate is set by all taxing jurisdictions combined levies. In Medina, the city portion of the tax rate is only 13% of the total after the State, Bellevue School District, King County, voter approved referenda, library and other special levies are set. The City of Medina receives approximately $0.13 of every property tax dollar paid by Medina property owners. N Budget 2007 Property Tax Distribution Port of King Seattle County EMS 3% 19% 3% State Schools 36 % Bellevue School City of District Medina 26% 13% CONCLUSION The 2007 Budget continues the City's efforts to provide high quality police, planning and parks services to residents of Medina. Redevelopment activity in the community is expected to continue at the rate seen during the past five years. The City of Medina is fortunate to have dedicated elected officials and appointed staff that strive to provide quality services with less revenue and at less cost than other similar size cities. I am proud of the City's team who has demonstrated a passion for creating a government that works better and costs less. The City of Medina is positioned to respond to various financial and service demand challenges in the near future. Our ability to maintain a high level of services in a community that is an outstanding place to live and raise a family is possible due to the fiscal discipline and use of creativity, innovation and efficient operations. However, the City will face more difficult situations in the future with less revenue as inflation outpaces the revenue generated from the maximum allowable one -percent property tax levy increases and redevelopment activity declines. Finally, I cannot conclude this budget message without thanking the dedicated employees involved in the preparation of this budget. Without the expertise, professionalism, and cooperation of the staff, this detailed budget document would not be possible. I would also like to thank the Medina City Council and the citizens of Medina for their input during the process of developing the 2007 Budget. Respectfully, Douglas J. Schulze City Manager �� ITEM J-1 2003 2004 200 2006 2006 2007 2007 !PRELIMINARY s % ACTUAL ACTUAL ACT BUDGET PROJECTED DESCRIPTION YEAR END BUDGET GENERAL FUND BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUES OPERATING TRANSFERS -IN EXPENDITURES OPERATING TRANSFERS -OUT $ 2,059,534,98 ,- 2E8,496.30 5,007,633 56 4,153,63641 $ 2,473 487 45 S 2,473,487 45 4 3R9,318.0(J 4 778,044 57 4,217877.82t 4 97,283.06 554,407.03 554,407.03 is 2,609,841.93 S 136,354.48 1 5 5f.". 4 716 920.00 S (61,124.57)! - S - #DIV,kl! 4,262, IZ4.16_1 i S- 174:841.10 4. 28 " 1 601,283.09 S 46876.06 8 .46 ° S 2,484,427.09 4 15 �7387.73 3 802�104.94_ 679,875.(X) �4332,392-35 - 68t4: 7.03 ,00 5050(n 399,0W.00 ENDING FUND BALANCE S 2,059,534.98 $ 2,018,490.30 $ 2,473,487.45 $ 2,090,520.60 1$ 2,609,841.93 S 2,463,354.68 S (146,487.25)1 -5 61 q. EQUIPMENT FUND- - ----- S 76j.6 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUES OPERATING TRANSFERS-M S 102,168.77 4,14U.W 77,000.00 IS 41,492.58 28.24 77,0W.00 $ 67,544.24 4,(XX).00 77,0000) .601 788.(X) , 00 1,332.24 S 3248.5-1 a 2,5W.00 S- 2,5W.00 1 #DIV.o! 80AX)(X) $ 3,wax) 3.90't 9045,7 77,000.00 EXPENDITURES OPERATING TRANSFERS -OUT �7!2 6 120,816.63 1 53,176.58 44,5W.W I 44,2120) 115,(XX).00 S 70,788.00 160.11-,, #D[V,'O! ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 76,263.51 I 1 S 41,492.58 S 6754424 191,423.08 S 104,044.24 S I(X),332.24 $ 223,729.99 $ 223,729.99 $ 67,832.24 (32,5W.W)l -32.19". $ 144,241.91 (79,488.08)1 STREET FUND BEGINNING FUND BALANCE S 476,862.92 $ 173,932.14 REVENUES OPERATING TRANSFERS -IN EXPENDITURES - —. - . I . 63,514.55 .— - 366,545.33 61,163.76 400,000.00 443,572.92 1 63,126.74 1 322,000.00 1 352,819.83 70,000.00 118,605.00 258,906.92 258,906.92 --—.—.--.--.-. - - --.- - 471,500.00 457,(Xk).(X) 73,475.(X) S (45,130.00)1 -38.05',, 271,293.09 $ 12,376.17 4.71;'k. - 32, iii).iM 7,00-. OPERATING TRANSFERS -OUT OTHER NON -EXPENDITURES 1 S 0DIVII! is NDIV,W -- LANCE—— ENDINGFUND81, S 17 3�-_14 1$ 191 ,42q.08 $ 223,729.99 $ lj� I 9 it 144J419 I., S 0.00 1 S (144.241.901 -100,00'a RESERVE FUND BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 1,776,380.33 S 1,776,380.33 S 1,776,380.33 S 1,776 38(.33 S 1,776_ ,390 33 S 1,776,380.33 i $ 0.00R6 REVENUES OPERATING T-RW?4SF9WS-iN EXPENDITURES - $ #DIV,io! 1 ODIVO S #DIV,'O! ls #DIV;0! -OPERATING TRANSFERS -OUT ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 1,776,380.33 $ 1,776,380.33 S 1,776,380.33 S 1,776,380.33 $ 1,776,380.33 S 1,776,380 TREE FUND BEGINNING FUND BALANCE —s710.00- -- - 69 9 .56 $ 1 64 S 121, I X 11 RAW. 4 -2.471. REVENUES $ 47,440.97 53,924.60 5 .44 $ 17,M).00 S 15,W00) S_ -(2jKX),W) -11.76". OPERATING NG TRANSFERS -IN I is #DlV'0! EXPENDITURES 28,860.72 3,423.29 2,539.36 20,(M.W 20,(M.00 20,(X)O.(X) i $ 0.0()*� OPERATING TRANSFERS -OUT is #DlV,W ENDING FUND BALANCE S 19,090.25 $ 69,591.56 S 121,40 .64 10I,405.64 $ 113,405.64 1 S (5,(W.W)l -4. S 175,Hi40 - --- S I 8, - 0i 29716 I - PARK iii6kRW DEBT iljWE� B BEGINNING FUN6—A BALANCE REVENUES --- S 65,909.60 1 S 65,909.60 - - - ------- ----- S (0.00) $ (65,909.60)i_-lW.W"l. . - 11 S iDIVM! OPERATING TRANSFERS -IN ___ I —----- 21 8,5W. 11 218,50.11 — $ (218,50.11) - 100.00'. $ (284,409.71) 100 (H?. EXPENDITURES 36J8T.60 36,387.6U36,3F IZ 2M,469.71 284,409.71 -- - _omgkAiNoTRXNSFERS-OUT • S #DIV40. -ENDING -FUND - BALANCE S 684.90 13 1 297.20 S yl�2 S 65,909.60 IS A0299; qmx)) $ (0.00)1 0.001�. CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND BEGINNING FUND BALANCE S 117,770.70 S 538,718.80 S 739,599 1,422,006.9271 $ 1,735,611.92 $ REVENUES 288,735.64 562,227.55 88F)306.46 1 699,605.00 I 1 148 6050) 900,0w.00 1 $ (148,605.00)1 -14.i7'. -OPERATING -TRANSFERS -IN -ExiTINbr-URE-S . . - - -T 602,875.(X) 470662-54 1 363 1000.00 735,W0,00 S 1,372,000.00 $ 96.67.] 28 00q. 589,346.66 89923 AT G T OPERATING TRANSFERS -OUT It $ #DIV,0! ENDING FUND BALANCE I S 538,718.80 S 739,599.69 S 1,422,006.92 $ 757,611.92 , $ 1,735,611.92 1 S 1,263,611.92 I $ (472JKX).0o]) -27.20% RETIREE MEDICAL FUND BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUES OPERATING TRANSFERS -IN EXPENDITURES T $ j$ - s S $ -4 #Dl% 250,0W.00 I S 250,000,00 ODIVAI! 44,500.00 S 44.5 XLO() #21V L OPERATING TRANSFERS -OUT s 'DIV,W ENDING FUND BALANCE S I s As— s ZQ5,500.00 i $205,5W.W #DIV,()! TOTAL ALL FUNDS BUDGET BEGINNING "D BALANCE .REVENUES $ 5,133,392.21 O8.89J5,018,743.96 S 4,782,504.81 1 $ 4,912,271.74 6,007,648,445161�23.T $ 6,1 50 164.17 $ 6,150,464.17 _5?962.254.57 S 6,484,913.97 1S __ '334,,3- 49.80 5.441,� _ _767895.w s (�54359.57)j 47%L.6PERATING TRANSFERS -IN 399,(K)0.00 554,407.03 554,407.03 I 601,283.09 1 S 46,976.06 1 9.416'o 679,875.(X) I 505,000.00 EXPENDITURES OPERATING TRANSFERS -OUT 4,811,906.29 I 679,875.00 4,861,974.03 505,000.00 4,796,459.01 399,000.00__ 6,401,287.53 5,627,9(k1.77 i 554,407.03 554,407.0 6,302,624.16 is 674,719.39 11.99%. 60 1,283.09 $ 46,9 OTHER NON -EXPENDITURES ENDING FUND BALANCE S 4,782,504.81 $ 4,939,274.74 1$ 6,150,464.17 IS 4,911,099.64 1 S 6,484,81197 is 5,890,094.81 (594,729,16)-9.17"51 Page 1 of 37 I a O O h O 0 o O O o h o' o I 01o1�v o0 0 O ' O O� 0 0 vl O M O Iof}}f-o- OIo O OIO O h O rn O rn o 00 000, , I , vv ooho00 vn vi O, oo IM O v N v O fp:Ni4i O � I I �• f l i Iv I I I I I I d, `, ISSSS 000c 0000 SoSS 000c 0000 '�OOI SSi oo '� { 'I'O SI o ,IOIerhOIOI'ON SiooSIC> o'v;v;oo o0C) 00 hI�'y N •� 7 O vNl N O •--• ,^ vl N INI = N I �O I N M h h I I I I I I^I N a. � I ,I I 0000 o0Ool If., O• � i^o' j ol000lol 700 y,'ti e I 0 O 0 OO 0 0 C O 0 C� O C� V C�, vi I 1 7 et O O I,' M Ivi O O I , ') C O I O O C�O O{N O N �!W 10 O O G O10 O oo-- O Mo rnh v nhol v p p ry ?� : L h C, 0 vi v', N O O •- - O I O ^I N I C� IM N I •- NI�o O N ai� I N 0 � I~ O O Op O O O O I, C> O I 0 0 0 0 O 0 OIC> Oi0 O O - I 0000 p OII0 1 0 , o , ' , O ( ' 6 6 i6 " OII , , N IC O O I 1D I ^ �n • v^ r� i O I TI �).J• � I )NI N ol I .-.. O N ,nl V�1 O - -M- r- ,I: 1� O vl O NO,ntl- O O O O M O 'o 'o O 10 O OO •�M-o o V C, C� ' C 'C' ' ' vi W ao g O O M M v a, o.hr-- T v D h I 0 D` C` O hIO C� C +n O vi p N M; 5�! I •-- hO10 I`� N O M o0 CD 000 00 O vi I I N f V -+ O r- NINi a, M I I I I I I I I I { �o0 I }O % of I M O 1 00 M 10) I O O O 1 O e} o O N 00 ol lM N h M C� 00 IM N O M M V'1 I, hI C i 0 I• V V O O N O •-� NIh I^ o0 0 O,, t�IO OIN O N �n O DD 7 M M ,n I M 00 •-+ ^ �' Q1 N M� IO O M v1 M O O �n •-- O Vl O� cf N O O vl O M h to N �D O '. 1) Io 1600 O I!` ^� 00 N N h M Ia, �?' I^ NIA). N I N N O Oo O N O O htN �f 0110 r— I I00 j I to [� �o I I C.o OI NI m i O' 00 •- ,n r r4 C\' 1= O V1 h C� oo 10 10 , I l MOihO D - II O M ,h N It ON M O N U O 0010 [-M'O N MG Moo Ili 0 M 00 hC�Ito `I. oo y V1 I ?N Nt+ ry C. O. C. Zr-t� i jC I I I N u i�! •o I ' ' I I la O F, w IcoI7 I �I C � q) � Ai � h I i N n. F o o ❑I x a az �i.. � t SIC ^I 'm Ii cW�nlI) �II w t~ w U„ UU i I I it e°8 IcO c I.f W'W> •;�W iI Fu�K I moa� �' � w .-, V i a.+ I 6AAAI. W A A x a. '�- 818 - O L7 vl I �C-. W I H rn 1~ f,,C AIIQ u v] V 1F m b oIb v I �1 WLt� w �'I c p �! u u w U W � a U S F• IQ• aG , � y yI-y �I.« h ola'¢ of((�t�jy.. UIC W Iala` m .0 Ri A V] W 0. `1 .•y.. :a QV 4i C7 2I A ^ ^ ,7� V Ci CI,C o Z: WI 'I F V� 2 2 m VI� p m�C' 0 0 Q) 17 C C C Ci � U w o �IO2 jo of .3ja Z' W I C g F W� 1: C F W F b v u u u 6I i~ E- -. M. yIEQ- tw7 aG 0.10 in � � _1 x q 6 0 � � V...Iw cn &0l cnnl �n U uiu UIU Q .:i a x x OIF opo`8' opSo ooS0000S000000lo�o a- S_ l - N N•a, +T N N N _ N ._.. N _. �n _ CsIOIO _ C-> ._ boo.- h I M a �o �o .o o W o o o 'o c 'o .o ,o 'o L M i •-+ t� •- M O -� 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O l� O. N N N ^ M M N �O N N 7 M d' M 7 M 7 MIM V %O M �O M �D M �O MIM \O 'D MIM 10 %o I oo aD M MIM 00 M I SSo OIOI O O O O O� ,O C� C, O O I O�O O Oi H 0{ O o oOo } t o o oI- o' __ OOooaolooO�O,oOOo$1o; _ o o 0 O 0 O 0 Q 0 o 0 O> 0 O 00�0 o O o 0 C> 0 C 0+0 �o ocU•oio1 _ _ -. �.. _.+$f $ S oolS S�S S o olo�o S�o _ololoE .IC> a I oIo S Soo 0 0l o- ooSlol.00000000000So lojo'o o{o olofo otoiol^toI o 0 o e e 0 0 e o o e e 0 o e r o O M o 0 0o ItO O O 0 N C O O r 0 0 0 .� 0 0 0 0o O �n�n O •--: 00 00 In O� C R O .� N In O al`O o N O 1„ O A� O A O Q V Q~n-~n•. O O O O O O O O O O+ O O O O O O O 0 0 0 V O O 'O 00 O �o O N O M ' , 7 r 0 0 0 O O O O N O vt O 00 10 N N O O� -- V O O O �D O T � N M p ry GM N N N vl N o0 �p p O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O pp O 0 0 0 O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 r O C d O O .-. CO O O p 00 O O O O O O N D\ N N "J' '� N r r In N M �D f1i N N fT N 7 r r bs o g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn 0 D o rn r r y ' o 00 00 000 a o oo �t �n v, 10 y p O 0 \O 0 O O �D O O C O O O O �D N O O N v) O �O O Y d W y O ur O �n O O 00 0 er O N N M rV r� O O vi N --� �D vi vi �o 00 00 1p C C r N T O r r 69 V 69 d fA O 0 0 O O O Cl O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O o o O 0 C 0 \D O 0 O 10 O 00 O 00 y O 0 0 O O O�� O N +1 M \40N C.w O N O O �n -� N vl V O� Q� O 'OG 00 00 O It oN C+ O O O O O C' M h r �o O C r N 0 yl r r o� o� .•+ 00 v1 N 00 0 -� O r O O ao V N O O �O r r* M v1 M vl In kn w n N N �n --� IS fI O N o\ lD --� 00 \0 o0 O v� O N O O W)� �+1 .-� `-' C, 00 \D N In \O In M p la+ -- 00 N N 00 00 O N vn -+ vi 'D \D h 1� ry e N V O O vi vi 6's 69 69 Cl O O O O M M r of o� vi t 00 O O O 0 0 C� 00 N 'V M N OR M M O O O vi vi . O N h O C, •-• vi �p N N O n Invl O� \O 00 N �O O M Cl M r O o� r M h vl O\ 00 0 00 00 M 00 M O In O N a N M M V9 Vy yq O O O O In �n00 00 O M 01 00 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 r \0 r \0 N O O r O O o O 00 "T N M R r en h C� O ' T� Oi t :r .-•. 00 %C 00 \O of h O vt M r r of 00 ^ V th r 00 --+ 00. 10 Vl r r N H N N ut N O O b9 d9 69 V] , W U W a � � W yV � wo a0 ��C7 AZ d Ow �' a1 `.�a� v� z Lo7 y .? h w O appe d w _� c e o CIS.� w A u Z U 7, O.-J ¢ 4. ai d d U ti m� � •• d o o m d O�., raUUUUaCa�FO- Uv�a.0 W F wF 9v� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0o000 Cl OO00000.-000 00 o 0 00 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v a o a o 0 0 0 - o 0 0 -10, 0 0- o o O O M N r M •-- N M r r <11 C1 Q, a, of Vl r M M M M M M M M M %O M 10 M \O M 10 M 10 In \D M \O 00 M O� M O� M Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O Cl U O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O 00 O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O QO O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O GIG 0 0 00 rz.; M§§ 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 O O r M O co m 01 m a b CO O ON r- N M A A B O A t Q Q O O O C 00 yq DD C C N O N 0 0 C> o o C O 0 0 ,0 O vi C O Op N 'O 00 00 ) M L a OR PC z O O O O O 00 00 p v O C O N � N M �• O Vl V1 Vl a >+ G S c o 0 o g .. oo 1 coo 00 �O o o c 00 00 o .ti N O O �n vi vl M W 69 69 00 7 O N Vim' N 0000 N o0 owl 10 �q O Vl O N en V1 O 7 V a M N t- 6q 69 M � 000 O N N t- t� r vl ON N Q N 00 6A 69 W, oo oo 00 t mIn�o N N M M M N 69 69 w U N y�,� > o Uco z rn ill ° O w H W Eiul j a j W, a>>> > > oldR��'�a w U)4cn z pwi �wroCA > y �F w >S o 0 0 0 0 a� C7 w �awa`awE- �w'w '0 b b OCO � V1 V1 V1 Vl Vl V1 V1 V1 Vl z �coo11 E.. 0 000000coo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U o 0 0 0 Qo 0 c =z§:ci; c00 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Q r o � N O "oo O O O 6f ++ O o 0 0 O O vi 00 -+ W d9 69 O O O O O d C W o 0 0 0 0 p L 69 69 O O p 0 O O o 6 0 O w p 00 N N 0 R � 69 69 O O O O fV O M Y A m I- � N 69 69 0� Vn 06 M Vl _ 00 p M 64 69 O N M M 00 N rn V V M r c p C7 R M m O N Q 69 5A U a W F� C O a z O Q U U w 0 0 0 0 0 a oo�oo w N N N N Y h In In W) O C O O O O O O O O E.. o0000 (Vj oocoo o c o 0 0 0 o c o 0 oa ee v0000 0 O O M Cr, F 0 0 O O M en O N N �C N N A O O O O O O O F N O 0 o M N O O fi1Y 00 N 00 CA M N M M V O p CO O O 'O...� O O O O s. fA w S O C •� 0 0 O O wl O O a CD p 'Ci m M kn vl V (M ^+ N d CO f.. a 6s bs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v e 'y 0c o00000 oSoo� 00 C d M M 7 V of N 7 0 n N {O. C4 qd }� O C N N N d' 6A 69 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O w 61 pO C 0 b ND O a C en C en O N O N In N N O O 69 69 �D �D 00 CT M O O F U1 M 00 M M M 10 M _ In In Cq C-4 N CT O N N M 6H F 00 T 00 r r N N n 00 O V n InF 0\ M R Oc 17 M -� 00 p N as N N N 6A 69 OIn M F 00 V' h N O S � 0�n0 p �y G vi 0� Vl O\ 00 00 et \0 . O N 69rn 69 w H C� C7 u x w 3 � w �wcr r 6 U Q Cl) w w c� o g.ccT A> �3H ¢ �° xHd'd 1W Ccn rn a a. 0 w P Q w F" 0 o g o 0 0 0 N M er of '7 �D a o o 2121212 CCO o w �w In Inn Inn CC, 0 0 0 0 H Cc>0 u 0 d 0 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 M 0 N CD ID d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r O� ��o O O O O C 0 0 O C. 0 0 0 ti. C C C C CO C �O N'T 00 00 M .—• V) r dCIO L a Got) 6oc) 00 00 0 0 d ,o 000 0 0 ti o 0 10� 0 O• N O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0140 N 00 69 69 r ,1: ": OO 4 moor N N M M O . 7 �O � OM O. y � t� r O^ et N V m� M 00 N M 00 6A 69 00 00 O r Vl N r N N _r _r ON O� M Vl V) M M Vl M O ON 00 O � � CN O N y 00 00 00 O 000 O CA 00 ONO r O vNi W) 00 69 69 rn O O V1 00 Cl) M N M M r 0 0 r et• �O �O V) r r 00 00 N vi O r D O O 00 _M N 00 00 ON O+ r O, 00 Vl kn r 69 69 t� H wcn U Z O w cw� to U v ru d w w cn w N Q p A �U)cn Faw� U w 8 � a tn z � w R Q Q RH 0d m O w F- 'O QwO O u. cn�H aaE- a�iO OFF- 0 0 0�00 0 rx oleiO o 0 0 0 w F. 0 0 c o 0 0 0 U 0 d 0 0 0 ioc ko o O 0 O 0 0 O e M 1✓ M N A O O O � O C N yq O M O M T O O � w ry a 7 OQ O O Pr s q v) 0 0 d Cci NOW o 0 L O O 69 69 O O O O No C. O to 01 CD 69 69 N N o � 69 69 d7 C O M h 00 M 00 N N rn 69 69 N N C = N N N O 69 69 z � a H u 0 0 v v W 0 0 o c U o 0 d o c 0 0 0 0 0 o O c o 0 0 0 0 0 'o 0o T O O N �o O C O CDh V a h O^ 00 C) O N O> h N 0 0 0 0 7 h N 00 00 00- p0 Q _ O O C O 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 C O O 0 0 a 5ry a, N O C O O O O O 0 0 C O O O O C O O O O O d O y V O O O O O C O O C C� O O O O O O O o O 0 O 0 O O O C O O O p M O O C 0 O O �D 0 0 0 0 0 0 �D O v� vl a b V \O vi W C, N vi M vi V- In L G. Vi 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O O C C O C O O O C O O O C C 0 O 0 O 0 O O O p O C O C 0 O 0 4+ C O O O O O C O O O O O C O O o N v1 O O O O C. 00 v kn 7 <! 00 p p u (� O vi v� O O O O O Ow C O O O (� M 0 C 0 �n �o M v� n 7 r �O V �c N N h -^ ^^ '0 T vi o0 0, N V N T V 7 N N h Y1 W) Y1 N h a >• kA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O O O O O O O C O o C O O O O C C c O o 0 d 0 O O = O 0 Cl ^.� , 0 0 Cp 0 0 O CDC 0 0 0 �+ C. O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 N O O V) h a^ O C O C O 0 p y M M N N O O N N �t 00 N T n h M N v1 In �n N N N T V) In M CO - (A ^ T O vn In ^ .--� N T 00 wn O^ V N 7 In T �n 7 n Vl h r- M M -tt 00 M 0 n In T 7 Wn n h T h V V1 fn 00 00 in `7 to - T O v� rn a o0 0o d v_ - T 'I T n V v O cl T -n 7 ^ 00 Iq T �o 00 T T r T h T ^ p r•i -- [- 1D O ON N a V <f 7 00o m h�3 T T h T h h h O V o0 T O o0 O CAN OO r� N N 7 O [� �O -� O N �D M h 1n rn Vl C In O O 00 O 00 to d' In N h Vn 10 00 f` M T N V M ^ h C f1 M n r n o0 00 N N O E N C^ O M N \O V O d' 00 M p 00 fn 00 M h In M o0 m M CD\0 M� --� 00 N^ V �y M -- M N h h N N T T o In In r-O M %o O V 7 ao 00 r-:N O N O In h r'- O N \O to M N N vl vl N N C O 00 - T M O M M V 'n N 'a' rh T T _ T M T to V� v1 et It N O O C o0 oo O Oo C 00 00 ^ N 00 O T vl 00 M 7 p M M M M C, r N N C 00 C M N N V Vl v1 N 69 cn V C > H r 0 3 a v � w d Q .E�. O dv [- aw `av w w �3 w w a ww rn F. ti 8 u v v, v, v0 oowc 4)a �EnV) .G�uaF- �. q'3 as q W o2! rdi� °" w c rn rn o o '� E .5 a, a�i o2i K R oO a¢ �P..a`.UI- o c A> a a n a 3 o F F- U rnC'n wa� rED un0 Otu Q��o:�Q� C) wZa.� �w0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O C O O In O O O O O O N M V C N M �Y' ar �O h a0 T T T T 'ITN M R V vt 7 V' V V V 7 "r IF �O WO O O O O O C O O C C O C O C C O 00 00 00 W DD 00 Oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 In In V1 7 to Vl V1 �n Vl C 0 0 0 0 0 0 U o o o g o o S o o o 0 0 0 0 0 o c o c o 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 o CDo ^ 0 0 0 0 O C Cl O d O O p 0 C 0 C 0 O 00 C 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 C C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 c 0 o o c c o o c c o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r- Cl) O T N M tE IL o o e e e o e 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 = oON o 0 0 0 n O e o O N �n b C. C 0 0 00 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rn ooq ^4 N A A 0 0 CD 4 In oq n O foi O O O -ItV O r m b N N N � O O C b 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b Cl 0 0 -+ O C C O O O _b In 00 0 0 0 N M In V 0 vi 0 O 0 0 n 0 n to -- N C O In o O 0 In b cl _M 10 -! In vl N ON vt N N b L Qy 6A Gn O 000 O O N 00 O 3 �n - O O CD C0 O 0 O og000°± C O C O th n rn 01 C O o O O O vi O C o O o O ' v; O O o C O (� O O O N vi t M 0 O 0 0 n --+ N O 0 �n 00 O In 0 n O� n vi O v1 N as N O W N N ry b 69 yq O O O N O O O O O Q O O O O O N N O C O o0 O O O O O 00 i o 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 C b �O C L 7 � O N �n N N '� �n O •-, n r -� O vi 'J v� oo N ao n 69 bq V' O� O M et N 00 In V N O O O O O 0 M 0 O 0 0 00en vl V1 W � M O b C N In t- N b d' n •�. N � W "� en N V N M � 69 00 ON n ^ O ^ O O O O N O V ON N Ul 00 O O O O O O 00 O M M O b b [. V' b O vl <{ b N b M fV o0 O+ O N O N O 00 M NO n V b N N w 00 N --� N V' N M M ,It 69 5q b 00 c oo O b O o O o 0.-. n D n O N O O o O C n o0 n b 7 M O C (6 h h , N-n N 00 M 00 NS T O O N tV a)CDN 0\ 00 as 0\ O� --� N vl 00 In N �n n N vi N oo Oi N O ON Q N 'IT N V' fA bq W U z Q z O N W U g h io U p E 'B Uz � �" Hca"� W la�� a °�ax 72v a °�UUA� �F wY�7Uh„3�„ �daznwwm0oa5�C5�3t- H � a v o a a d 0 0 aawxt• H 0 O 0 O O O O N O M O O b a-,O n oo O O\ O 0 �--� 0 N 0 M 0 V 0 vl In oo W 'n OOi 00, 00� a, ?OT ON ON 13% 'O.T a, °Ci � ", OOi T 'n Wn W, H O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O 0 C O O 0 C O O^ C O U 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n C7 O O_ N 0) f6 a. 0 0 0 0 n 00 C1 O O O O O O O4r) �O ON N N SEE 88 8 i O O O O O O N ••+ .7 N M d Ci L 69 b9 69 'fl 9 0 0 0 O y Q M O M M N in et N M M N y e a� fioq Ge 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 o° o 0 0 to M en 69 FA 69 N V d N �o 00 00 69 V9 H9 Q O � � o � N d us 69 69 N Q 69 1 fie b9 QD U C7 d w H O xco F � Q A ¢ P; O w ¢ iYr W U � CL oH0o �Wo 0 00 �n o v � a rn W ao, o0 00 00 U U o o d c 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c O O o0 rCvor o 00o000r 000N- MT --000 OTC n� h en �O V r O N 10 T vl O C r N O O h N O vl O c O c v1 M r Wn en M N vn O 00-- W) O 00 O 10 N N O Q M N O O N M C O C O O O O O C C O C C C C 0 0 0 0 C O C i O C 0 0 0 0 0 C O O O Cl O O O C O C O O of M c c c c C O rm O C h O 0 0 0 0 ^ yj CV' r- O a O C)�O CD CD vl O c O -+ C)In O --� C) O CDV 1 M CD N C) O CD O C P W) C)O nN C)�O Vl N �--� -+ M h N N - N O o O 00 o 0 0 c O O O O C C^ o 0 o 0 0 0^ `0 0 o C o o C c o c 0 c 0 c c c o O o c O c o° c c c 0 c to c O c O c C c C c O c o c r d o 0 o D o 0 0 00 0 0 o C O C 0 O C C C c c <t C '�h V'1 M O In C h C C M Wn O O o0 N Vl O O O h 0 0 OI- ul r4 v1 W) 00 b a, W) In -Ittri -•� 00 �D N 0 W ^J� -•� N Vi O N r M N 00 N N en V N N -+ W d9 O O O O O O O O O O C C, C) O O O O O O O C O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 o Cl C o O o O Cl O O O C O O d k. W c c %c r` M 0 0 0 O O pp^ o c n c c r c 0 O O O c c O O O O C en 00 00 et N M O O O lD ClO O O O lO O O O C V O C 0 O In to lD C O �n O y y M M O O CA owl 0000 r T 00 'n 'IT 'IT Inct Mn --+ O V N r 00 N N 00 W tt') %O N 69 0 Cl 0 C O O C C o C O C C O O C)O C C C 0 C-- C O C O o o O 0 0 0 0 O O O C O o O O C O O C o N c N ' Oi In c c c C c c c c vi c c vi c O c c c c c c �p ++ 00 o0 O C M -+ 00 o0 O T O v1 O lD O 0 O 0 O O C O O M' O C O O O O ^O C)O C O C 'D O O O o O n N O O NrD In C N -0 N V NM - b 00 N N 69 00 It r In T O vi C_ ON O en InN T O �D C N O T --� r vl -� V1 M M C O 00 1- C h M ' 10 h�c V 'n t` O N Vl N T N T 00 h •-+ T r N T r lD M r 0 w r r- M Vl -- -- M �D M 00 O tt O M cl r <t M -+ C OO O0 T 00 h --+ b T O O fn 00 N OO ~ r O M T � M N M 00 N n N N N DO N a dr b r N N 69 N %O Wl O 10 N 00 M vl vn 00 O M C, a, -- �D Wn O 00 N N , O O N r C, N 'n N vl ' �D M N T Wn OO �D h N M V T 00 \D V �1 N M r O T 'n ^� Vn N 00 'n D T N r 00 00 00 00 v. T -- --- r 0,-+ �D h r It r O d- N V •-� V1 O M N O M O In O T O T V M d' M M C t- r N W 7 N N N T •-. N r N ^� NM N en N bs r O O R N en T 10 O vi T M r r- C r T O O r 7 O r 0 7 C <Y h r r OO W� 7 M T r` N t- N vi T m M vi 00, \O T *D oO vi N_ wi T M qq T �n T +n M I vn O^ In N en CO n --� �D N O ^+ N vl C M N h M In a, cl W) I ' M I- V r 00 N -+ �n N •-- M O u 0 N 00 O 'n N to 00 Vn r 00 V --� 00 N N vi h N ..-i 00 r N Nen 69 N 6 O C c U E-� W u En z a z 3 a oz 3 48P. r CX N °d y o:% QQz U v O rn ~ be c 3 0.wl 'V' wa+ wcli m Uhr >iw❑ > Al ° F a > q �3 �d mmW a T a d° ors N _ 4% c :F°� F pap... o° o f 2 .a In l+ 4 a Qw� Owa°'U rncn0 54x� awa°'a�.OF vai0a°a aa: C O O O O C O C O O C O C)O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O •-• O O C <t In 10 O N O 'n O M -• N Vl ^- N M V Yl 00 00 07 N N N V a o 0 0 o O 0 C C o c c o O O O o O 0 o C C o^ O W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CAI" V] In Y1 V1 Y1 -n V1 V1 V1 V1 W) 'n 'n z O co C O S O O 8 O C O C C^ o O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 F. 0 O 0 O 0 C o O O O O o O O o O C C 0 C 0 O 0 co C 0 O c CD C C O 0 O 0 O O O C V V O C)O O oo O O O C O C O O CD O O C O O O O C O O O CDC O C,C O o 0 0 O 0 Co C) O 0 O 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 O o C O O O C C C C O 0 C O 0 O o O C o c. 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 o C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 o c o O I - co O N m N a o�e�ooe e m le �O S e p p e: e{ e OI ol,oa of r O e O O!O�Ito V 0 0 OIO 0 > m SDI N vl oo - O O O CI•- In M �njN N! hI O O'> O I n of +0 N itv r � 1 AI i -�---CIO _! .-I- I�Q 0 IO 0 IO OII O o o O , I O O i �O O O O O 1 IO O Oj OI °` ,IOO10 OIO O oO I) ' OI 1 r 00 O O Q• O nj It- h N O O O O O ooI N j 1 ! M Cl! NI !/9 1 bl Iml~� vi, vi o0! I I Iv 1 I i I I I^i oi0olo o!ol0 1 0 1 0 9 0 oIo 1 0 1 o 0 6 O olojo Icic 0 0 c Olol 0 c o c S g oioi o o olc 1 01 oI of ! I oI of c o io oI !o of WIC Y 00 In N O M In O O O In O �) O jv'iINIr OIN O O O OIOi O O IO oIE O (� hI� IM ^.I ~ •C+ ai I I, ! i I III i I I NI I I j � i-- a j II iil 'o O 08000 0 0 0 O 0 0 l00000000 0 0 o O o 0 0 O' 0� I �O o o) of o ociccc� p p 0 0 c N � oppccoic v c c a d Q t r N �n OI O Vl O IO O M1 O OIOI^ p p pip O O' MI NI O 01 O In Of r1 p d o !N Mi O1 f- In V N h' Oo -•�I I N � I ' l ! popI000 poIIol001 ( C> l o O! 0 ooggqIo 00000f O O O O O S o O 0000000o od�0000gg �O Vn N O o 0 pl. of ml oI o to Clf 0, Ioo O 01 M « O N Vl O In DD V t w O C 0 0 O, I In! IO O `O Op I"a --� N wiI Oai �°iM '0NI._.. i r Ir' IO ^I N� �^ � I i h W D1 R O M M �O 10 O O, O�N,-+ 0 1 In °� O O o, N pl O NI V OI O. O 00 4! C' m ' O ' (M In c'vi I\O:O V' c vi. mi ' Mt I r -+ ^I m \O o �� r ^ � IN m 't N r CN -+I In t 1 O oo ! V IV 'n m O, lO Ol O, -• NI NI IO o ohI I Im r "' I I ' o, w IOMMO O 1 N O 00 r �7 N rj c� 4 �O r •--� O �D r to a0 In ' r h m In II I '.. O,,w w c O, O N m r m 'O O' In( I f ! O to I ' ' f N O W �t \D I-1N o0 I r N N In O W V vj r m.-,Ivi{a O m to i Im I\C OI I I u i I Ni I to i (O In M to •-- O O O o0 0 m 7 �° M I oo oo In7Y0 — O oo to -• O O v I i 7 c,41 oo 10 I \o r \0 I llO I llo I m I O , N c '0 O O coOo N c Oi . In ! O' 4 j ' ri , I ! t` t` I N 0 oo 00 •-� O vl "D h -4' In M o r O 10 T o. \o oo I In i O "I o0 I N I oo. rn i ( I i •D Cl� O� O N NI O\ O, t` 6 M oo m rI I.-. rI ! mI m M N I V Q I In M h I m m I I OOi O I 1. ( 1 ' f� .0I �IW 5 •�y UI Q I �I � I � �I� Izl ! i IFS j > ¢I jco �j.j wl IQI cl a vl IO � fU v W v I o o I� c/li >I ' QU.' } � W I❑'� I IW O W•�I +��" � °c� U �i �. ° v,� I A$° W O .�I Z � a s `n c o o v,� v! '��' i � C m I•..• a == a'U > p t7 �nI�IW U U U �_ E; �i L3. � ,, � � � � � a Q P4 �I � � �I•� � o �I � cola ri,I_I<� ��I�I €I¢I I¢ > v H F a s n F -_ 34¢ O; O O N O m O o O O-- o� O O -- O N O m O I O In O 10 o In w 00 �o I O w, O\ R a a V 7 d' v-t In vi vl In vi In vi ,n ,n vt � �D _ ao�00000- Pq 1 _ CCOOOGCO14CN N_ N - N ' N N NiN N N N�N _ N'N j I Vy Vl I Vl to NjN In In Vl N Vl Vl NIN Vl Vt NIN Vl 1) Vl In Vn I to NjNi IZ O O O O�OIS O IS O O10 Oi0 O�O 0I0 O10 i t I a, I F pi0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 00 0 O,o 0 0 O;O 0 0 ! O C; 0 o I U o o 0' 0' 0 0 0 0 000000000010 o,ololo oIo 0 0 0 0!o I 00; olol i Qoo�000lI oOoo.1 (z)00oo olo' 0 0l0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010'0 0l0 ojo; 000000 000000o�000io o;o� N 0) (6 d zz J \\ \ 7J \\ \ k-00 \F \ a, a, a, r4 a .kn @ \ E -V wa w 2 \ \ c, 2j/ m% � «� \\k kk kk\ _ _ f \ \ 2 eq / « \f \ }2 2 a} a� // m «. In fA \§ \ os 2 d \\ ®« In« » . _ 99 2 § \2) § tea® @ z 00 0 §2 &§§ § 4 ? ■ \ / R 2 \ w o \ k 6 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 C O V t� O N O N e O OO C OC NW) A A A 3k 9t 3t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 O O O O r o 0 0 �n 00 n- N O O O O O 0 1. O O O O O O OO O o0 o0 00 C i h N doo enOM d' L. a �Y99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 000 0oo 0 N M w)enet b y V 0000 a� 69 69 HA 69 0 0 0 0 `D O O O O O NO O et ct (9 4A 69 69 �O to O O N M h N O_ O_ O, O, N �O oo 00 V1 N N a0 N 00 en- DD N V O oo M CR '3 �o �c o0 M N O N w Q M M O oo O., M N N N N oo 000 000 N en 7 In 7 cn V 69 69 69 69 N N N rY et M O u n n n N R M M M 69 69 69 69 C. a � � A z U U Cw7 u �U�a ad a i a w > a�i a cr p Z u U i„ U U U � +� 15 �aH_ v' cn o o 0 ' U w �✓ m ti Q `�° O O W OCnA OCLlcwl u91., uj0 O C O O O ^+ N 0o V 7 � \O \O a O Cl O O O O O �� N to N n N In N Vl N Vl N V1 N V1 C O O O O 0 0 F. cc o00 00 U o o D o g o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 o c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N m co EL O et T �t T O� M M � O O O O C en M 0 O 0 0 O O O C 0 )n T r• o .7 V. V 0 O O O N Axt �o AA \D 00 00 et of AA M A O N A A AvA O M AAA Cl O O O O O C O C 0 O O 0 0 O O O O O C O r O r O r T T 0 0 r r C r r O O r i� r i r r r r O r r J � po r O O G9 v) O v) M T M T O In C O C N O r O �D N 00 00 N N N O O O O O O 0 0 O C O O O C O O O O O O O C W C O y r L [� .-. N r N h CDO N N O O O O O C C O O O CD O V) 0 C 0 V) c b 00 0o vi W) o v) o d W) r - a, N y O N N )D �O �n N C r 10 M L a 6q 0 0 0 C. o c o Cl 0 0 0 0 0 o q o 0 o q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V r )O r %6 r vi v) O C r 0 0 r 0 0 CO o 0 o O O 4) h h 00 00 O O O Cl O O O O C O 0 0 o� W N N M M vl v) O O 0 0 O O O v O n rn O 00 N p !C M M M M N N O r- T 69 O O 0 0 O O C C O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O C O O O O r )D r v) v) O O r 0 0 r 0 0 O 0 r 0 C r 0 0 o v r- r 00 00 0 0 C g C. o 0 o O a o 0 CD N N M M N N b N N �D )D O vi vi vi rn O vi ^• r M N r N M r T N 69 N N r r 00 00 M -+ V O r T r N O M M M \O )o rn V) V G vl 0 ^� M r- N C OD •O �O r M M V D\ vn r V) 00 r v; fn W 00 00 N N r r h --r r o0 h C N M r c p rn vl O O N N 'o NV O en O M M Q � fA 0 00 00 .--r 00 T 00 00 00 �t --� INO M N V o' r �o M O t- oo 00 �o r M O O v'f M CD� 00 N \O r 0 T O N )n O �o IT N r 0 00 -r ON N r v) 0,N %0 T v) T ^� <} to wl O rn N N r r t %o e�{{ r 00 O r T V n -- N N T o0 r N'r N 00 r �o r en -+ (21 M N Oo T N N T N N M M er N r N 00 69 00 %D 00 00 C1 to N N N O 00 rn CY O a,00 a, 00 N N V V 00 C r N V) h \o N Ch M T r -+ eY ao M M 00 T O 10 `D V T )o 00 O _M a0 N r T 00 O r D V h O T o N O r 0 T D 00 T N Q 00 �o M N N T v) rn N T 00 7 O a, 7 a, ONrn N N \o .-r M rV 69 co N y x [- w U cnCD W cn z� (n °a W z p~ `° `) ycn w - O W 3 u �` En rn WaU °WZiz � LZ k- y c„W W ' . o O a 5 rn ` a > U c"" b w AO cn W p. CL W�'3a'3 � W a�o5to a0i-�.0 �v,—y�oW WOran o -�v0O oo ao °° �' 0 C C "" N Q y N N ..+ q O �� ❑ a" w ❑ t H v� cn -a C wn p iL w O .C�'N, '� '� '� p > > e m" O 00 Ny O O F ❑ G a`°i o R 7 7 O A vnsncn0[ aaa[� wOF Oa`w W a,walx W dwm0 �UUt-F AAF- C O O O O O O r N rn N M M� )D 10 0 0 0 0 0 C O O O O O O 0. O O O O O O O O O O O )n �O O O O C o 0.1 t 00 v v 00 o0 oo c 00 00 v 00 c 00 00 0o o0 00 v 00 00 rG N h V) VI N Y) N V1 )n Vl )n V1 In Vl In N V) rn 'n Wl 'n N rn rn 1n N V) Y) V) )n V) V1 Y1 rn Vl In to N rn Yl Vl N Vl V) Vl r� O O O O O O C O O O O C O 0 0 0 0^ C C G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 o C 00 0 0 0 li� 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 o c o oC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C0 C 0 0 O C C O 0 0 0 0 0 Co^ o0 000 00oao00o000 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N � O O O O O �n vi v"i N O O O O vl • 'I� M M 00 N FL 69 O O O C C pO pOp 69 O O b O O oOp O N O en O N = C 69 C4 O O CT vn O a N O O N i+ G � M M M n �p 69 00 O O M O QN 69 T T M N N V M 00 000 N O = 00 O N u Q .9 69 O w q U U. z w �~ cn oU a � z w ood o A p U A A U w 0 O 0 0 v �o OG Oo 0 F 0 o o � 0 0 N N Vl V1 00 C? [-: N �`A°' A LlLlG1 O O O O O O C a C C O O O O O O O O O C C C O h r- 00 0 0 O � Rn 0 0 p r- N vai v�i O\ ON N N N N M N h l� N O O O O C C O 0 0 0 0 C i. 00 O O\ O O C O C O C O 0 0 C 0 C C' C C O C O O C y O O O O O O 0 v C O v n o O O M en lO vl Vl. N M N t- 00 N N N L a 0 V 0 0 o 0 0 0 V W N N p O O , t ON CD 6 O O O n M 00 N N C N O ON ON N N N a` �+ by 6s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 a+ It It 0 0 0 O' C O O O C V, O O O O O O C M O O en 6p9 69 p p C O O O 'Orq d' d' oo OO O N wi vi � O Vl ON M ' cli f+1 .�T 00 Nu ON ON M �t N Yi b9 0 0 lO OO Iq �O h C O en00 00 C rl- 00 hr' ON .o V' ' �' r Ca, � N O N \-O 10 ar N fioq In rr O�� 0, N N 7 N N �c Vn .--i kn hv0 .: �6 00 a 00 ON O\ 00 �.hc N Q N N O fiA 69 z a W w a3 w w C40)° W v� W AO �3Q waa ww w w v,0 :D wF vH w C4 cn a .a 04 48 ..4 a Q v C d O rn Q a a — Q w a, Q o w a J F. > N v U '^ O 0 w v 0 O w l O E- Q� R F- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ^� Vl r1 7 O� N N M M V' 7 d' O O O O O O O WO 7 -,t 7 ,�t 7 7 7 I tr) h wl wl In W)�n z o 00 00 000 E. o 00 00 000 U o 0 0 0 o c 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C o a o ti M O co N Of t4 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O N vi O 00 O O O O O O O O O U O �o o C aq r M O M N O v) O O O O O O O O O O O r DD O � -+ 0 o M O M M O N C 0 0 0 C O N O O O O O O O O O r O O Vh O O g i O i i i O N 00 00 N N !n 00 C 0 0 0 O O O O O O C ^ `0 O O O C O O O^ O O b O O O 0 0 0 O O O O C 0 0 0 0 C 0 O O r C y O O O O O C O O Q O O O O O O O O 0 O C O O O O C O O C vi O wt O O O vl O vi O O O O O C O 0 0� .� 00 N O M N V) r ON h M Vl Oi ^+ 10 V) Wl L M c o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zt v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y CgC CCo CCgC B�gSoo�o moo .. .. 8 . W O O � 0 0 O O O C O �n N O � N N I"• \0 N r O� n M ViO Oi d _r r d' N M 10 'n V) 00 b9 6A O O O C O O O C O O O O C O C O C O C O O 0 0 0 �+ O O O O O O 0 '..� 0 0 O O O o Soo O 0 O C O O Vi O �n O Vq a+ N h r o0 ID h N M T r O ON C o O\ Vi O Vi O � O 'IT GG^^ V i ID O It Vl 00 O ^ �-" 00 N cr M 69 � ^� N M en of h 00 It 'IT �c ^ r- o r r 00 N O M N M O) r-� O` M OO) d• N V M O n o0 7 O� O N N O N N [� N V) Vt 00 7 00 Vl D; 00 N r �o t- 7 N M V ID rP O O M V) O` w V) M N O� N O M V1 M r --� r 00 N cl N �D �o O) .--� M --, C M 'cl V1 M ^- -� N 00 o O� `R -+ �o M h Ko 00 Vi O\ qT It\D ...� N 7 00 10 R N V) Vl eY N M �o O) N M r N Q M 69I I 69 I O N N y r 00 \0 O r r 0 r w N 00 O� 00 Vn en O, to N 00 r r V) 00 Oo M M V- �D O\ O) W 'n 7 r \.D \0 M 00 N O 00 O O\ 00 M V• N 00 r V) M 00 e? asr 10 �t O �7 W) 7 -•� O� rt N --� M N --� o r v� 00 M 7 O O 7 N \O Vi M et C, � N �O �Y ON 00 M 00 N Cy7i d N N IT r M 'o O 'o O O O 110 r 00 00 NW� \O N N Vl r 00 00 N �--� M 00 01 N [h N O O O 'n V) M O, V) eP M Vn 00 C14 W) 'o et N N r r 00 M �r -It 00 00 N N N �c O ON Q\ V) r O 10 \0 00 M O r to [^ M r- ' V) N M O O In 7 00 r N r rJ tn V) M M M -'� '7 tt ^•� r M M M d sv � C7 w a w U U a R H a z w a a, ; v o w y O 0r�0 > ` f O 2 8 ¢W A w� vi a w0 c R7 > td "F" > ; c0 -t x d o ¢ o o¢ a$ U¢ w y N v Y .� a� ¢ . ¢ ¢ m> O w a O O H o 0 0° O d 0 0 a cn V) 0 E- a a �D E- M P.IF- O a 0. u F.(- 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 I<D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 o O o 00 o 0 0^ 0 c o ^ o W o0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 woc o0 00 00 00 r h h h r r r h r r h r r h r r z C O 0 0 C O O C C O C O c O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 o 0 0 g g g g g o o g g o g o g o cUj d o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g O o 0 0 0 010 c 0 Cl c On h Cn �D Cb h 10w o0 O v1 ON 00 00 N 0, •-+ N O O S O N ••- M O �O �O N N e1' [� N of N D1 0 0 0 •- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O �c o N M N h O ^+ �O 0 ^•• h 00 M C h M w W)�O V1 01 d• O N O .N. O Cl --� M Cn h M o0 M O M 7' N N_ h N O, -• 00 er N ...- N O O O Cl O �O 0 0 0 00 0 0 \0 O O O O O — 0 0 0 0 0 00 -+ y O O O �16 O to 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 4 +., 0 0 0 0 0 �--� \0 W to v) O vi O N d to CD1.O �o O C, 0, W)•-+ 00 --• 00 Ool -- O V 00 M --� �n t� O� fl O to \0 •--' M h O1 O� O` V• 00 OCTO0 kn N \4O D1 N 10 V vl �o M N N V a 000000;000000 O O O O h 0 0 0 0 0 0 �O 0 00 O C 0 0 0 ri 't N O O ri oc PC --� O 00 h 0 O+ Kl vl h 0 O� ^" 00 V O V M O l n O M O w 4n �o 0 �O N CV Wkn h h O R vl •-+ N l� N h l� y L oo O M N 00 00 D N oo O O N L � eY^ 69 H9 p O O O p N O O O O O pp O N O O O O O ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 O h O \0 O M h O �c [� O h � N O O "O a0 O W oO O �O T O N tn 00 O vi -+ h O N W- � -Z O M 00 O M N in 00 N h M O w ON O N w N V %n h M N 64 69 '-+ 4n M h 10 Cn t- 0+ W v1 M N IO O, N" 'IT M'T 0 h 00 N 00 h M Cn N e1' cN OO V O, O \D M N O o0 \-� O ^� -.- N M -- -+ W O+ N O M V• N M O cYJ h W M 00 O's M N \0 M h N h In N M In N \O M d• 69 69 �O h h<71 0\ W) 010 00 M O\ M N M — M O M N O N h M h O --� Cb M N dD V h 10 [ * M " 00 N O: o0 o0 Cn M -• h O o0 \ o Cl d V 00 00 00 O V �O 01 N M h 00 ~ 00 00 O u N a0 M to Ic 00 N Q V N M M 69 tf3 O ON .� N oo .� O eY �c 00 vi 00 M O N M e1• M 00 •� O Q\ e1• 00 00 4 00 en O rl to h N OO \O t- 00 0o O N h M'It N h Cl ---� C N O d' M M V O 00 N D\ M \,O h w O h N O V N N h O N� O M� N M N i 00 d M 69 69 A z w z .� C Cd h � rn N Cd Cn W y U U a A > cd > �] U O O 0 •� '� 'Qu cn —co F o a�0co i En aWw Fa°wWAaa � O 0 O O � n c� MvJoJJoo 4t o ono o o� n orri ooro O N _ N N O O O O O M O M n W O 00 N O 00 N O ON O {7' v 00 r N O 10 L a 66 bs O N M O tT O d W O O a L r r 00 kn 0o V N L N N N In a� to va O N M O O+ O O O r � a+ GI O O C) O T O In O <t o d rn oo o0 c 69 fppA O O O O O O Oal O O O r N b9 N M O1 M b'1 O O O O R O O O O n O E N i0 0 0 0 O v v Ooro or0 e o a, N d rp 10 sv rA cn v w U w w d a � „ v O Wina4au0xP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. Ov 0 0 CD x w 000000 r O� r O+ r T r ON r C) r Cn z 0 0 0 0 0 0 p-. U 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 11 r 11 ✓ M M [� N\ G1GaA r c O o O cS 00 o 00 C5 0 C N N N M M N i C O O O C C O 0 0 O n vi v� O O vi O N E •67 b N N O 00 O 00 N 00 Ci L iL 69 609 p p IO u W o c5 CD 0 ID d O 1. n r N d r a� 0 0 0 0 0 0 N W i- 00 b9 69 N N O O N N NI N O O 69 69 0 0 O O 0 0 vi vi vi •7 O p0p p0p O OO r d 0 c 0 0 0 00 c 0 0 r � ao va 69 U w z a W O 41 zUz W w S O' H W p 5 x , d 0rnw� OwOH OH 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 a oo g w � a rn rn z 00 0 �.. 0 0 101 U o 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O N N N (V a O O O O O O O O O C N 00 r o o- 00 0069 o�nr;� N O �i O O O O O O C O C C 0 00 O C O N � � L .M1I O O O C O NO d N a� 0 0 0 o 0 00 In 00 �n �o �o tn o N b9 H9 O O D _ "t C en N N 0000 69 69 n v� N (o vl _ � O 00 � O OM o N yr N O 69 69 z N w �w d pi e0 Z as >E _O W w E" U U .- emu C a a - a a. rx •� w w w w c a od a aQa o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a c v a o00 w ca _, Z o 0 H U V o 0 C. 0 o 0 0 d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O M N N m (6 a 0000 00 c o>r> 00 v 00 N CD Q M O O O h h W vi vi C �o 'O o M N60� O S O O O Vl VI r M 00 M 00 00 vi N � In r m h N L � N M a 6s rn rn SSS U �oo w o lc� rn rn 00 N y y N N M a� 69 rn S S rn a w+ O O OCli CliO Oo .b O O 00 00 N vwi N v� N N M 6q 6q -It O r ONO ONi pS N C 8 G O N 10 N N 00 N 6q M M M 6q o.nr oo r ho^v� co �_ 0 N C. V 6% 6q O M N N Vl N M r M %O n W1 :i 7 M 0 In \0 enN 00 O W ^ N Q r4 N In 10 D 6q 6q N b W C g�w z v� W�y ¢ u abi RE y p io u> z d u y r a W V. w O S S S S o.-rao 0 N 00 00 00 a 0 0 0 O W N InO� M M M M M E., o000 0 U S S O Q S S 0 0 0 0 0 a0 00 N O M O C 0 0 0 0 0o O O o O to p p O [� 00 00 N O Q 0 0 0 O O O M O 0 0 0 C O O C h O C O vi o O C o 't �? h 0-4 A O O 0 O C O C O C OJ O O O O O O O 0 O CDy, O O O O O M O O Cl C O o 0 0 0 C 0 o 0 00 O O C O O O 0 0 0 O C O C O o 0 0 0 0 C? o 0 L C. 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 C O 0 O O c O O C 0 C O I- lC C w d 0 0 O O O O vl O �n C O O �n O O C O O v� O v^ O C CD O C O C C O O C O •Ca Oho Oho N h 000 C N vMi L a 6A to 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 c 'O'Lf c o 000 00p00000o00000 o O oS O non 0 O o�noo�n O o O O O noo�ooc O C O C O O n o c u W L vn vi �O N 00 'D ^� vi V N N T ^+ vi ^' N m h N 'Q aC �O �O e1' �0 00 1- On C 0 pp O O C O C o C C o o C C O O O O O O O C O C 0 0 0 00 'J. 'J. O O p C O O pp pp O C O O O O O pp O O O O O O O O C O o O C C 0 O 0 o C r+ d O O O O O O O v1 O vi O vl 'J. O V1 O O O O O O C O v? O vl In � N 00 �O -+ �n O M --� V vi .--, vi .-� vi o0 N N 7 69 � T O T M 10 M 00 o -+ N M ' N t-: O0 N N ^ C .� 00 h o t- en h h w h h V) �} Vl N h T w 00 w h T 00 0, h h "T o _T 00 Qp OO 00 h oo ' 00 V d M. V1 T N M 69 � M T N T M T T C h M 00 M M M N T T O �O h Vn N V T K N 10 llO T -+ \O �O 10 In Vl OO O O O h h N O O ^- 'O O 'D R M O ^+ oD M o C_ N fM en h 00 lc It h h N M 00 N DD N en V 00 N 10 b �-+ O� �O 00 10 l 00 M 10 �' h n N(0, Vl T vi 7 en N In �1 rn N V 69 h C. V v T �O (� T T N O N O -+ N 00 �n [� h M M M M T N �O T v1 T vl �O DD �-+ DD a0 00 M M M -f 't T ^+ T o 00 'R Wn N M N T T v1 M e3 N N �t T M O V1 0� 0 O C �O M O h o M �O O N N C '� M M G+ •-• •-• h -- �O O d' h T 'O h •--' <t T M M �O M � b9 w z w H z WwW 3 H oa Cr rCr m .a �. W^ V En � gz « y N � En `aw w "c O =ns m 22 W "� 4 �� o� o �� M F. � ti a 48 be W c o in U v U cn to �j 'i O w0 ¢ A y o� Q y O _ O CL acw uuF- E- o o CC o c o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 O g O O O O O C 0 0 0 0 0 O N N M M V �Y 4 V a C O O O O O O C 0 0 0 M V C1q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V1 V 'S et V 7 '7 C 7 T In O O C O O O O O o C 0 0 C O O O C C o C o 0 S O O O O 0 C O E. g o c o 0 o C o 0 0 0 0 o c U o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 o c U o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 c o 0 0 Q o 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 o c 010 c c o 0 o c o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 o e 0 0 0 o 0 yj N r- L c � � L a 6091 r^ o o Nam y � � o N � 6H 69 tn N u Q 69 69 O o � � f N 69 69 M o � � N 69 69 o x w cn w wz x v� w o O w O O[--O 0 0 o_ a w o � .a z M o H U o U Q o0 o N 0 ti cM O CO N c CQ d tit O O yy N L � a+ � � o E D L a 64) 609 6's c O O N �w L i a 0> a+ o ,o o N 69 69 69 C r O N v 69 69 O ate+ o N � M O cd � o'' O N Q 69 b9 co L7a W O cn 0 W w E" � C7 vWi � i7 H H o F— 0 0 0 o_ a o w � z g H U Q o o o FMOl N fl- M w O h N CD m a 0 0 0 O N O O O O O O O oO S p N L O O O d Oa L a 0 0 0 � ,0 0 0pp p0 0 w O O O d N }O14, W � 69 69 69 O � b i O N a 69 64 69 M M M O � N a V�'t Val Val 69 6) 69 0 0 0 O � rn rn rn O V M M M 64 fA 64 O, O� C� en O O N O o N N O d 69 6v W� O w O w O Er ?61 a A a ] O w w 0 0 0 v� W RG o a 00 a z c H U o O U O d 0 M O oe o h o 0 0 O e O O O N h O O by N O � O L O O O Fi d O O N I L CS Qa 69 69 C. O O O Op O O Y N i as N N N a� 69 uA 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 p N N N 6H 69 M M M o � N 69 69 N N N � ri c�i ri N t+1 M M 65 N N N M Ol oo oc N N N N 69 609 En W 0 V W U U cn En x O t� F�- u- W [� F Q Q b O O 0 c. v o W o0 00 z0 H M 0 ti M O M N a o e o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O r O O 00 O 00 O 00 N N N N r of 69 69 V C O O O O N o0 o0 o0 _ 69 69 O O C p N 00 00 00 69 b9 kn O eq 64 64 O ad � � O N V d 69 69 M o N d 64 6s � Q O a O q aW C7 Cd a a F Cl O O a O w F F 0 0 0 W o rn z o F U o U o d o 0 0 N o O h O e O oo O N [) o 0 � h n O O, O, h d aI Va Ofin eY V �F fV 00 00 00 N N N k n N a � fA a ate, 0 0 0 00 00 00) fA BH h h n O O N 00 00 00 N N N fA f!9 d � 00 (71 r- [1 fn N 00 00 N N M en hH ffl T OMi Oho Ono en M fA EA en M q{ 000 00 Ono Ono O u 00 h �o �o N d M M b9 b4 w u,, H Im � F- W LU 0.H1 A A A A a. W 04 a c4 O 0 9w a. C 0 0 o a h M n o0 a Io 1�0 w h n N h z o 0 Uo 0 Q o o 0 0 0 0 N N r C O CO C O OO O OO OO OO N e B O O, p V > O C 0 O O O r o o 0 � e 00 00 N r 0 <Y O O O O O 60 p Owl O N a ar D Ca In d. � O � o °i a u9 6q 0 o 0 0 0 0 o d O oo o Cn C) 0 vi � N O O O o6 o0 o0 6q 6q bq O O O O O a+ O O �O p p %Cp \ NCO N N N st O+ Ol M M \p !A ff9 69 In N tMy dam' O O M Ol ^• ^- M O O M O O C N Q en V' rnO 7 000 000 0 fA bq 6q �. N C O N p N 00 N OC, N � vi v1 vi 6q 69 O O O Vl en O Vl n v1 � 1) O C oro N % p N CA_� 00 N N N \CO b 000 9 fIi Q �C+ N zQ 7 w C.0 u uza fx O p a U H ; g Q Q qa O.0 Fw W E Zfm U LX7.7 {.L� L7-i i1a O �/ Q GA F rj F u7 of F d�72 O U 1-04 w3t70 O� Ow0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oo0Corn o �y 0 7 In M O W M M M OM O CT C r r v v o r M M M fn M M M I O M O M Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F o Cl 0 0 0 0 0 U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c M M M M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O M M O O vl N O O r lD r \D n On N a, N� b 00 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O r O O Cp 0 0 0 O CD 6A O O O O O C O N O C O r O r r V 00 N vl Vl M M .-. .N.. Wl '7 1p 1p N A O O O O O O O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 O V r C d S S O CDS O O o 00 •� ,� O O O O O O O vCi C4 C h 4. R y C 0 S 0 O 0 S 0 S 0 S 0 O O O U y O N L U O In 0 00 0 00 0 O vl vl ❑ O a N. N h ^ VJ 69 69 Q% b O O O O O C O U G 0 0 0 0 0 0 O y O O O Op Cl O Oen N be N� O O O O en Ln vl In M M �D O 69 69 O N r M N M N M N 'J ty CC; ' N CA M O O y e} N 00 00 O N u O ~ � � N 69 69 69 O M S 'Jr� a > �p O vl O N_ �c to O 03 r R en o0 --• M M M O — b 00'n p, pl Ol pl Q N d N N 00 00 N "J 69 6A U q ti O� V O pl N r V 0 0 0 Cl- 00 C. C. ^-� CT 10—� If)h O O O O O C O O N O O O O O O O O r v 00 � O N vi O r O N N lc M M M M V) r N N M r N v'f . O O rV O� 10 In M N 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 > 0 En w w w F z F o00 w m o 0 0 o U -U W of M >~ EL i+ UJ�j a a+ vp� �+ wwoa x z.o u U U y G p� Urn c0N N N m w U CL d W � p � W aT' �X �F x Ua a3i F rnaw� Zvi cn�n U M M M M M a o c c o 0 w M M M M M i� Vl Yl � Qof 0 'T 0 a, O� 0 O�a, 0 O, 0 F. 0 oc000 0 0 0 0 U S S o S C Q ooSo9 r r r r r 0 0 0 o C M M M M M r N O O O O Cl O a 69 6A 0 0 0 IZ �W o0 0 W � N fV N 69 69 w d I i O at 'n N � 69 69 in O 9 � o N � d 69 69 i o N � d 69 69 M O � � � o N � 69 69 lm Q O A aw z a: OwH N 0 0 0 fx � o rn a ton z o Uo U o o d �o e l� O CC> O N N A A A O O O O O O �+ O O O N � � d � D, EA 69 b O d � O W L a� b W O .a O N � � 69 69 O 8 i o N � � e9 69 O O N u t7 O W N 69 69 A W z Q U U U cxo A w w A � � w mow, O O 0 0 W Cq X z o f.. o U o o � 0 b n M O (D M N 0) cu a W o o e o 0 0 0 0 0 U lJJ 0 I� CO T O O r r oOrnrar� � C7 m v to co o to W v m 40 4 - M 00 Lf) o 0 x M v N N V 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 f- 0 0 n O O Id, CD O m tt tin 0 W tM eN- O 0 Z LL) F.-M mq to O N T to m (D 0 O M � O 0) N O f1O. ch O � J CM N T � cf W m o d d9 64 69 69 69 VR 69 69 69 Co 1000)) N O -- UN O N W OcoU)MtiCf)(D � 0000 'OOrNCON N to Q r r Cf IL 69 Kfl 69 64 69 69 69 6A 64 mtoOtnp0 Co C'01-(D0000 000000 0o0o0o qt co r- to O c) a)O IJJ N O O U) ti W C') N O M N (O 1- Q N O N (O 0 to f� m fl tf) U) M m L Q O r T N CO N W T r =N N r I- m z r` E9 69 69 64 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 03i W O N t- CO N to 1+ O Cl) X T m J r 1- 0 M M O N CO to t- m 0 UJ M Q Ln 00 (O O 4: r- O N (� as CD (0)r ('M d' N 1' Z N U CD a N CDr N to N vi CD F- N r d Q 69 64 64 69 69 69 69 co y W U) co (O M LO r- OO CY) fCY) co d O p OOrqttNtnto Q 'a O H O 'ct C7 (O C4 O CD m C 1+ M M to N M r04 �- CD a)r m N cM N O t Q N 0 f3 69 64 69 69 64 69 64 C: Co _Q (fl U • J _ N- CD M O c C ems- O too J O N M I- to N CA O N c)(A o U V(D o C O V O N O U a a) U p O� O 1� (mO O 00 T r coT r p IZ p O.2 (0 — c v7 N L -O O C (0 U N r r t7 Q N V _U N C.) () a N U 69 c a) O O m 0) N v ) a) . (c � (.4 69 63 69 61)- 64 69 E O V) O Y � O a: a r� � L aU)) ��Y v w d O ai m o c m U) "� ai m U m c U (a y U (p rn m e rn 0 � � .. m C ai O L a) C] O a) r Z i ~ � O .c � O > 0) � (� L .� Q v O Z L C cu _ V N m O- v 0 LLJ N U =� () L =g W a) aF- O � O �t—m.� �Y U) N w a a) LL U a�v� 06 L L L L L m£��0 w �o v00000 v v v v v m )° c aa) m in in cu mO c o p a a v v vU) v v > L L a) ~ a 0) c c c cQ c a av)o5�v z°a 0 Medina Police Department Memorandum DATE: November 7, 2006 TO: Medina City Council, Interim City Manager Crum FROM: Chief Jeffrey Chen RE: Police Department Fleet In law enforcement, a patrol vehicle is more than just a method of transportation. It serves as an officer's `toolbox', containing the equipment they need to do their job. It is their `office', where they spend a large amount of their workday. It is also one of their `tools', used to protect citizens or themselves. As such, the quality and quantity of an agency's fleet is an important issue. The following table shows the vehicles currently active in the Medina Police Department fleet: VEHICLE ,;UXIBER 6 YEAR 2003 MAKE Ford MODEL Crown Victoria . I PtT DATE 6/4/2002 VIN 2FAFP71W23X111873 PLATE 34437D .. ENT MILEAGE 83,155 7 2003 Ford Crown Victoria 3/14/2003 2FAHP71W43X191069 36066D 76,824 8 2003 Ford Crown Victoria 3/14/2003 2FAHP71W03X191070 36067D 25,672 9 1 2004 Ford Crown Victoria 2/24/2004 2FAFP71W04X138362 36291D 47,545 10 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe 1/20/2005 1GNEK13Z35187839 491TET 33,167 11 2006 Chevrolet Crown Victoria 2/2/2006 2FAFP71WX6X121703 42017D 19,168 Current Utilization of Fleet Vehicle 10 is unmarked and assigned to me as the Chief of Police. It is used as a command post loaded with equipment/supplies. This 4X4 vehicle, not considered a regular patrol unit, also provides the department with emergency preparedness response capabilities to traverse different types of terrain, especially under in climate weather conditions such as snow. Vehicle 11 is assigned to the on -call supervisor, which is presently the Acting Lieutenant. This is a necessary assignment for several reasons. The on -call supervisor must be able to return to the city in a short amount of time when an officer needs a supervisor on -scene, particularly at night. Having a marked unit as well as the majority of their gear and equipment on -hand means the supervisor can return to the city in a shorter amount of time and can respond directly to the scene of the incident. Further, the Acting Lieutenant it also our agency's representative in the Major Crimes Task Force for the Coalition of Small Police Agencies and must be able to respond to the scene of a coalition incident directly from The four remaining vehicles are utilized for patrol purposes. Due to current staffing levels, we are currently operating with only two shifts, day and night, although this is not standard. In the near future we will return to a three shift schedule. The chart below illustrates an example of such a schedule. Example I SHIFT C 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 05 As you can see, if the Officer working Shift A has an incident that requires him or her to stay past the end of their shift, three vehicles are required. During the period of time when only two officers are on -duty, the third vehicle is still utilized as a patrol resource. We have found that the presence of a patrol vehicle parked along a street, even if it is unoccupied, is an effective tool in reducing traffic speeds. Combined with enforcement by occupied patrol units, this allows our department to cover more area and make the most of the resources we have. The fourth unit ensures that when vehicles are out of service, whether for general service, repair, vehicular accidents or equipment replacement/upgrades, there are still enough units available for the officers on patrol. With the quantity and type of miles put on the vehicles, it is not uncommon for one or more units to be unavailable at the same time for required maintenance. All four of these patrol vehicles are driven regularly by the officers. During major events, all available officers are called back to the city. During these occasions, such as a large incident or a dignitary visit to the city, all department vehicles are utilized at various command posts as part of the operations plan for the incident. Vehicle Use and Replacement Our department has a pro -active approach to law enforcement, and as a result officers are out in their vehicles conducting patrols fora majority of their shift. Although this is a benefit to the community, it does equate to more miles on the vehicles. Many of these miles are driven in town, which is not ideal for the health of the vehicle. In addition to miles driven, the number of hours on the engine is another factor that impacts the life expectancy of the vehicle. For example, during a traffic stop, the vehicle is parked, so no miles are accrued. However, the engine is still running. This adds to the wear and tear on the engine, but is not evident by reviewing mileage quantities alone. Once a patrol vehicle reaches a certain level of use, it no longer becomes cost effective to retain that unit as part of the fleet. The cost of repairs on an aging vehicle can quickly drain a budget. in addition, a vehicle with a high level of usage and aging equipment The age of the current fleet is staggered in order to minimize the financial impact to the city when replacement is needed. Regularly scheduled maintenance is conducted to pro- long the useful life of each unit for as long as possible. From experience with fleet use in our agency and maintenance history, we try to adhere to a four year replacement schedule. VEHICLE REPLACEMENT CYCLE: Patrol vehicles are normally set for replacement through the equipment replacement fund on a 4-year or 90,000 mile (whichever comes first) rotation. The only exception would be a vehicle with lower than usual mileage that could be kept, if desirable, in the fleet longer than the prescribed 4-year period. ***Note: Seattle, Bellevue and Kirkland Police Departments rotate their vehicles every 3-years, regardless of mileage. Patrol Car 6 was purchased in calendar year 2002 and will surpass the 90,000 mile mark before years end. The vehicle is showing the ex- pected wear and tear that was described above and is projected for replacement in 2007. We anticipate the need to replace Patrol Car 7 in fiscal year 2008 and will evaluate whether Patrol Car 9 needs to be replaced in fiscal year 2009. Another consideration as to the number and diversity of our fleet hinges upon the fact that some of our constituents have commented that when they call for a police officer response, there are situations where they would feel more comfortable having an officer roll up in an unmarked vehicle so as not to draw attention to their issue. Our department has a proven track record of conducting comprehensive investigations that sometimes require employing surveillance techniques. The use of an unmarked po- lice vehicle is essential under these circumstances. Summary One of the many things I feel our department does extremely well is the effective and prudent management of all city resources. I strongly believe the Medina Police Depart- ment, as we have over the past two years, has the necessary and appropriate number of six vehicles in our fleet to sufficiently serve the citizens of Medina. 3 J To: Medina City Council From: Drew Blazey CC: Roger Crum & Rachel Baker Date: November 6, 2006 Re: Police Cars I recently sent the following question to a friend of mine at the Washington State Patrol. He retired after 30 years as a Deputy Sheriff before he became a director at WSP. I am going to our interim City Manager to have Rachael post in our CC packets so all have enough time to digest his thoughtful analysis. We have already heard from Chief Chen if you remember on this subject. My Question: In Medina, we have nine police officers total which includes a Chief, a Lt, a Corporal and six P.O.s. We also have six police cars one is used exclusively by the Chief. We also have a mobile van not included in the count of six. When we evaluate the PD staffing, we used the WASPC Report "Crime in Washington" to evaluate whether we are 'overstaffed" in our PD. This report does a comparative analysis of "number of police officers vs. city population." For Medina, it shows we are fairly robust with nine POs and a population of — 3,000. We also have two non-commissioned support staff in the PD. The question is now centering on number of police cars. As I said earlier, we have six police cars for nine officers. The Medina Mayor, me and perhaps others on the Medina City Council thinks this may be a lot of police cars for a small force. last night our Police Chief said they pull two 12 hour shifts with the night shift currently staffed with only one officer. That equates to one car being used at night. Naturally, our Police Chief defended the need of all the cars last night but he appeared very subjective in this frank discussion. My question is: is there objective, established ratios for the number of police officers vs. the number of police cars for small communities? An objective appraisal of this ratio is needed now as there is a clamoring to replace a car at $45K when we have not seen an objective basis to the total number of cars. His Answer: Hi Drew, The car issue is always at the center of budgetary discussions because they are such a big investment. They are a big deal to your officers because they are their working environment for 12 hours each day. A good car is dependable and keeps you alive. A bad car is undependable and can get you hurt. (I'll tell you some stories to illustrate this next time we get together.) I don't know of any formula for cars similar to those used for staffing levels. It depends so much upon your patterns of vehicle use for your specific jurisdiction. When I was on the street in Fresno County I had a beat the size of all of King County. I could put 300 miles on a car (1974 Dodge) each evening out there in the boon -docks. Your use in Medina is obviously not that high, however; low mileage around town is harder on high-performance cars that driving in the wide open spaces! I would suggest that you generally consider the following: 1). Number of cars in use on each shift with full staffing. Evidently you have 5 cars available as one is dedicated to the Chief. Does the Chief work a "beat" or respond to calls for service on a routine basis? If so, then his car could be figured into the total number in use. (Is his/her car a marked patrol vehicle or plain?) I believe that a Chief probably needs a dedicated car for a variety of reasons that we can discuss if you like. — You generally want a car for each officer (unless they ride double) per shift. Sounds like you do two shifts per day (12hrs each) with one carper shift. Right? If so, then that equals 2 cars. (Each shift needs their own because both shifts might sometimes be out at the same time if they overlap because of complicated calls that go into overtime.) -- I'd like a spare car at the office in case your cop on the street needs assistance or supplies. Someone can get to him/her code-3 if needed. (Do you have mutual aid agreements and quick communication with adjoining jurisdictions for officers in trouble?) -- There should be another spare for when a car is in the shop. I think that this comes to a total of 4 cars as I understand you situation. (The support van is probably for activities other than direct enforcement, and they probably use it plenty often for the miscellaneous stuff that always comes -up.) -- If you have a detective working on major crimes then that could be the 5th car that you need. -- The Chiefs car would be No. 6, so you're not off the scale completely if the detective's car is needed. If no detective, then you might be +1 car which is not too bad depending upon your fiscal situation. 0 Page 2 2). Age/condition of the fleet. -- This affects the time in the shop. The best formula is to have the age of the fleet staggered a bit so they're not all new (with the potential bugs of new cars) and not all old (with the potential bugs of old cars). It also lessens the blow of having to buy a new fleet all at once every so many years. Low and high mileage cars should be rotated so that they get the same use. (Officers will have their favorites and least favorites, so one or two might tend to remain parked much of the time.) -- Do you have a ceiling limit on mileage for patrol cars? (This can be argued as a safety issue for pursuits.) I think that my Sheriffs Office in CA was around 120,000 miles, but I don't remember for sure. The State Patrol would like to recycle them at 120,000, but some are well over that. 3). Levels of use — The final question is, how many miles do you experience per car per month? -- Do some cars (like the older ones) remain pretty much unused? If so, then you might have too many. -- If they all have roughly equal mileage, then is that mileage as high as you would expect? In other words, does a car sit unused for three days before someone gets around to needing it? If so, then you might have too many. Well, that's enough rambling from me. Good luck with this issue. Cars are emotional subjects (look at how they are marketed) and I know from experience that your Chief won't want to give -up any assets that he/she currently has. Neither would I. 1 also know that you have accountability to taxpayers, and hopefully there can be a balance between the two since everyone is working toward the same goal — public safety! 0 Page 3 CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE CERTIFYING TO THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY OF KING COUNTY THE ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION FOR THE YEAR 2007 ON THE ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY IN THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY R.C.W. 84.52.020. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Amount to be raised by taxation. The amount of $2,170,000 which amount, when added to the beginning fund balances and estimated revenues from all other sources, will balance estimated expenditures during the year 2007, is hereby fixed as the amount estimated to be necessary to be raised by general property taxes. SECTION 2. Levy. For the purpose of raising such amount, a levy on all taxable property within the City, both real and personal, on each and every dollar of assessed valuation of such property, is necessary, said revenue and levy to be allocated as follows: General Tax Levy: For: General Purposes $2,170,000 Total General Levy TOTAL TAX LEVY $2,170,000 $2,170,000 SECTION 3. Code Reference. All sections hereof shall be considered of temporary or special effect. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon the 1st day of January, 2007. . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2006 AND SIGNED IN AUTHENTICATION OF ITS PASSAGE THE DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2006. Miles Adam, Mayor Approved as to form: Wayne D. Tanaka, City Attorney Attest: Rachel Baker, City Clerk Passed: Filed with City Clerk: Published: Effective Date: SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Medina, Washington On November 13, 2006, the City Council of the City of Medina, Washington, approved Ordinance No. XXX, the main points of which are summarized by its title as follows: AN ORDINANCE CERTIFYING TO THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY OF KING COUNTY THE ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION FOR THE YEAR 2007 ON THE ESTIMATED ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY IN THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY R.C.W. 84.52.020. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed upon request. APPROVED by the City Council at their meeting of November 13, 2006. Rachel Baker, City Clerk ITEM J-2 CITY OF MEDINA Evergreen Point Road, Medina, WA 98039 (425) 233-6400 www.medina-wa.gov MEMORANDUM DATE: June 12, 2006 THRU: City Manager TO: City Council FROM: Joe Willis, Director of Public Works RE: Proposed 2007 — 2012 Six Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 1. Recommendation — The City Council approve the proposed Six Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the period 2007 — 2012. 2. Overview - A. The 2007 - 2012 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes the Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) mandated by the State. B. The proposed 2007-2012 CIP was created by reviewing the approved 2006-2011 CIP and making adjustments and modifications to the plan based on updated street pavement conditions and the condition of other Medina assets. The proposed near term projects (next two years) are the most critical as identified by current conditions and needs. The out -year projects are programmed based on an estimate of projected needs. This CIP proposal is supported by site investigations and professional judgment. As additional needs are identified and evaluated, adjustments to the CIP can be anticipated. C. As discussed in 2005, given the fiscal situation for the City, the present plan has been adjusted to spread out the City's Capital Improvement investment so that the program in any given year does not exceed $638,000 ($ 63,000 from fuel taxes and $ 575,000 from REST taxes). D. The CIP is divided into five (5) categories: I. Street Improvement Projects 11. Storm Drainage Projects ITEM J-2 III. Sidewalks/Paths Projects IV. Building Restoration and Improvements V. Parks Projects Categories I Through III constitute the City's Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). Category IV projects are facility needs. Category V projects are park projects. All categories combined constitute the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The TIP portion of the CIP must be reported to the State DOT by July of each year. Additionally, the City shares a copy of the complete CIP with neighboring cities as well as with each primary utility serving Medina. 3. Projects by Year — The following is a summary of each proposed project by year (note that in any given year, the list of proposed projects for that year typically includes projects from more than one of the five categories): A. 2007 Projects 1 1. NE 161h Street Overlay (Evergreen Point Road to the Overlake Golf and Country Club) is in need of an overlay to restore the deteriorated surface of the roadway. 111— 1. 841h Avenue NE Sidewalk Replacement (NE 241h Street to the power sub -station driveway). The existing sidewalk is buckled and heaved from tree roots. The sidewalk needs to be replaced following root barrier installation. IV — 1. City Hall Addition: Upon completion of the existing building condition survey an architect consultant will prepare building restoration recommendations and a cost estimate report for the Council's review. The report will be followed by conceptual design for an addition to the present building together with recommendations for interfacing with the existing building and a projected cost estimate for Council consideration prior to the initiation of final construction documents. B. 2008 Projects 1— 2. NE 281h Place (Evergreen Point Road to west terminus) This preservation asphalt street overlay project is proposed to restore the deteriorating surface condition of the road surface and to address drainage issues. 2 ITEM J-2 1-3. Evergreen Point Road (SR 520 Overpass to Fairweather Lane). The City of Bellevue water main replacement project is schedule for 2008 along the west side of the roadway. The proposed improvements to the storm drainage system followed with roadway shoulder construction will provide a base for the proposed walking pathway project III — 2. III — 2. Evergreen Point Road Pathway (SR520 Overpass to Fairweather Lane). Following public input, the proposed pathway will be constructed along the west side of the roadway over the filled shoulder completed in project 1— 3. V —1. Fairweather Park Improvements: Under this proposal the existing gymnasium playfield will be upgraded for sports play and a stairway will be constructed to connect to the resurfaced parking lot. V — 2. Medina Beach Park. With the completion of the new docks and bulkhead, the upgrade of the irrigation system and pathways will complete the planned park improvements. V — 3. Viewpoint Park and Community Dock. The existing dock is in need of repairs before major reconstruction is required. C. 2009 Projects 1— 4. 801h Avenue NE (NE 24th Street to NE 28th Street): this section of roadway is experiencing cracking and settlement over the existing storm drain. The storm drain will be evaluated for repairs and upon completion of repairs the roadway will receive an overlay. II —1. Medina Park Storm Drainage Pond Dredging and Rockery Repair. This project will restore the storage capacity of the pond for storm water runoff and will restore the rockery edges along the north pond. IV - 2. City Public Works Shop Repairs and Improvements: The present shop area is in need of repairs and improvements. Storage and parking area are maxed out, sufficient materials for emergencies cannot be stored, mower and maintenance repair facilities areas also serve as storage areas, making use of those areas difficult. Employee support facilities are also not adequate. ITEM J-2 C. 2010 Projects 1 — 7. Evergreen Point Road (Overlake Drive West to NE 8ch Street): the existing roadway is cracking and in need of drainage improvements and a street pavement overlay. 1 — 7. NE 32"d Street (Evergreen Point Road to 801h Avenue NE) This proposed preservation project is to restore the roadway surface condition and provide a walking path along the Fairweather Park and Nature Preserve frontage described in project III — 3. 1— 8. NE 281h Street (Evergreen Point Road to 801h Avenue NE) This preservation project is proposed to restore the roadway surface condition. 1— 9. NE 181h Street (Evergreen Point Road to 74`h Place NE): This preservation project is also proposed to restore the roadway surface condition. E. 2011 through 2012 Proiects These are primarily street and storm drainage projects. Most of these road surface segments are exhibiting pavement cracking in their early stages and are included in the Transportation Improvement Plan for program and scheduling purposes. They are reevaluated each year prior to the completion of the annual six -year plan and if conditions warrant, particular segments may be reprogrammed to occur earlier than others. Project II — 2, NE 24th Street Culvert Replacement has been included for removal of the fish passage barrier in the stream and to replace it with a box culvert that will aid in the removal of silt which has been a problem with the existing culvert. 4 X ~ X r W~ X m~ X �Yy x x Jx( W W or IL rr m X mr LL F- mr rlL mr r x N. X m x mr LLr X -mr L I= L' x x Z� ui OW j a W O W W o W W owr r m r o W IX m r ouj m m r > Q> O .2 sEr. W W W m W W w Oi gw O C omg C M O oW� O o�� U m� H 'i'B !q Cig t9 �im�m 19 fA !q C O U C O O O O O 00 O O O 00 V W 8 8 8 g g o 0 o o g o g a � rz a z Uzi m ° W ° � 4 O Bowe O ® m C 0 d m m m m m m m E W w m m m m oo, Eo@m a m m m m m m O Q c Q y E E E c E E E E E E E o m m a m w ro m o m m w a 0 o v 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 a Q a Q a Q s Q a r E O a Q a a a a M Q Q Q Q m m m ts m m o mp n n n s � W m m 0 a m 0 m m o rn 0 rn m w m 0 m wa rn rn a m in m = Zr w m m W c N N o 10 O 0 O c; 0 e N 0 r O Ol O o h N c 10 N o m O 0 m h 0 C') N 0 0 r r 0 Nm 10 � b N a E h N o eE i Cg c w w a N m g, mw Z a c' Z Y J C t !q c z a< M c w E E yN C N r N N `• a z m a3 m "m w w z w z L i $ L w Z w' Z w �v $ $ $ $ IL z a. IL w F ILz < '° m >' �° aO `c j O O c c 8 o c w c a 8 m Z W n U y c IL o a r rc w f 4F Q rn» Z N Z w� Z Z Z aNgo W Z Q fi > Q z o Q W O a a ¢ K ircfZq0 v aIx R N O r ~ Z 'O m a w w O a m Z m W z w iy � O C W to a.c Z Z c to o y 'c O Zm o 4¢ O W c� r z c z w 21a a N m w a a m 4 Zuj� Ij Z Z w n w Z Z Z °n� allo Z x x X V)mw IL 1� co SOoo W O O O O r r 1,�! k U. O N N N N coW ti O z N N — N — M — — — _ — — — U N O X X x W Li W uj W ul al 0 m O 0 co O o w O a o E ii E ° c g c O C O S U O N O J m c a$a w ° c� E Q a � o o°i m Z m u E can v n U 0 n x m m L O r n Fa � D O W � a.4 a w Z o a c orn `fin c v m�8 0 1m0. C m L O ^ D O N a n ID G m tx o g N 03 o, Z o z ° S a j �3 m m a y g m ° 3 � m m m U n m L m � L c m 00_m fi N Z U O + m W 0 2 8 Q m m m Y •. m c E � m ° co a £ v m 3 p .m C > N W .. 'n V C o QI L m � pl 0 0 Y m rn m c a ... E J c w QdZ IL ) I I i m O k r m p O m O m N (OV U >' C 0 0 y O y a a r N t7 a I!I U W K EL z Z W g W Ir IL 9 z O Q H O a U) zd C F O z H V W O cr IL U) Y Q IL N � W f N f F N H W W W W W W O O O O O O O O O N � N M W 1A t b N E m � $ 2 p � E E LL L E $ � .W a c c m F m S. rn � c c U � � E J J b c 0 rn g o C 4 m � a - a a a z Z z g m IL` W m z m a z C _L me m E � m m ILL 2 N �[ m a Y U a Lm 8 0 L m c 2 n U. ;'qy_c 2 pE V 0 N 0 N 0 N N t7 T G O b 8 U � ® a n n b m c !^ t O a n m `m ` n m v E L n a a m o o $ ° ~ O mm 2 D W 0 Q D c:c a n m v E uri o m n m m ° b '2 n X m E y $ r �n a Z ii 0 N a m c o ri N m m O m � G a � U N m L n c w m m° m i z N i� 00OOoO o O O O O O O O O p �O2 O9 Ro O p �OO O m mm�cmm � M L� m N W o (f N G m ui p rOD O.O •-N N pO N pO 0p N N N N lOV a W (j O I W Ja O co y ITEM J - 3 City of Medina AGENDA STATEMENT i AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Services MEETING DATE: DATE THIS ITEM WAS LAST CONSIDERED BY COUNCIL: Agreement for City Manager Search November 13, 2006 October 9, 2006 SUMMARY OF ISSUEITOPIC: During the October 9, 2006 Regular Council meeting, Council authorized Mayor Adam to interview executive search firms and select a firm to assist with the city manager search. Mayor Adam interviewed Waldon & Company and Prothman Company on October 11, 2006. Waldron & Company was selected by Mayor Adam to conduct the search. The City of Medina has used the services of Waldron & Company several times in the past including searches for city manager (1996), police chief (1998), director of public works (2003) and city clerk (2002). A copy of the standard professional services agreement is attached for Council review and approval. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ❑ APPROVE ❑ DISAPPROVE ❑ SEE COMMENTS N/A CITY MANAGER: ❑ APPROVE ❑ DISAPPROVE ❑ SEE COMMENTS ❑ N/A COMMENTS: ❑ No Action Requested ® Action Requested ATTACHMENTS: Agreement for Professional Services BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $30,000 ❑ BUDGETED ® NON -BUDGETED FUND: ❑ ❑ N/A RECOMMENDED MOTION: (ADOPT/APPROVE/AUTHORIZE) I move to authorize the city manager to enter into the professional services agreement with Waldron & Company. If Council Members have questions, you are urged to call the staff person who prepared this agenda statement prior to the council meeting. P:12006 Agenda Packets11113200611tem J-3a, CM Search Agenda Statement.doc October 13, 2006 Mr. Miles Adam Mayor City of Medina 501 Evergreen Pt. Rd Medina, WA 98039 Dear Mr. Adam: Thank you for your confidence in Waldron & Company. We are pleased that you have chosen us to conduct the search for your new City Manager. We look forward to working with you again. This letter will serve as an agreement of services to be performed by Waldron & Company for the City of Medina. Needs Assessment & Evaluation Waldron & Company clients seek a recruitment process that assures the thoughtful selection of successful candidates who share the client organization's vision and values. A distinctive part of our process in all searches is to talk to as many key stakeholders as possible to ensure that we have a thorough and comprehensive understanding of all issues and concerns relating to the position to be. filled. This thorough information gathering is important not only in educating us for candidate screening, but also serves to create a sense of inclusion among the client organization's stakeholders. Waldron & Company acts as the client's agent in the sourcing, recruiting, pre-screening and thorough evaluation of final candidates' background and skills for the contracted position. We do so by: Conducting private interviews with key stakeholders as directed to determine desired candidate skills, cultural fit, experiences, and attributes. We will take direction from you in regard to whom we contact. Reviewing the current position description (if any), and other archival information related to the position and the organization. Preparing and refining the comprehensive Position Specification for the position which includes: A general description of the organization; the basic function, authority and responsibilities of the contracted position; the organization's immediate and long term goals, as well as the organization's vision, mission, values and philosophy; all candidate qualification requirements including education, experience and personal characteristics; and, the position's salary range, benefits and relocation provision (if any). Each search is different and requires a unique approach. We will evaluate your organization's specific situation and needs and work with you to develop and design a tailored recruitment strategy to find the best candidates. The remainder of the project continues with the: Design and approval of a timetable including key event completion dates, as well as a target for selection and appointment of the successful candidate. Drafting of a recruitment letter describing the position and inviting prospective candidate applications. Creation of the supplemental screening tools (if any). Initial design of the semi-final and final interview processes. Candidate Recruitment Strateey Our approach is heavily recruitment driven. While we will gain search visibility through the strategic use of appropriate advertising, our success in bringing the best candidate pool forward relies on our ability to target and recruit proven candidates. Through the Firm's experience and tenure, we have developed a deep network of contacts regionally and across the country; we bring this network to bear in identifying and recruiting your target candidate. Typical activities involved in recruiting candidates include: Waldron Consultants and Principals making direct recruitment calls to contacts and prospective candidates. Utilizing Waldron's database and contact catalogue to develop a comprehensive list of prospects to be reached through a direct mail/email campaign. Waldron & Company maintains key staff members dedicated to research and candidate identification. Direct correspondence with target prospects. Planning, developing and placing advertisements in appropriate publications and on web sites targeting qualified individuals. Distributing position materials and announcements, as well as requests for supplemental information. Candidate Screening Project consultants from Waldron & Company will conduct phone and in -person interviews with high - potential candidates. Following the interviews, we will review the most promising candidates with you and recommend a pool for further consideration. We will consult with you to coordinate with your internal process requirements as we proceed toward introducing semi-finalists for the position. Our process may include having candidates provide a brief application and responses to supplemental questions. While not all clients have us facilitate this supplemental stage, we have found that the completed supplemental materials can provide: A good sample of a candidate's writing ability. An early indicator of the sincerity of his/her interest. An opportunity to view a candidate's analytical, management, and communication styles. An indicator of his/her philosophy and values. We bring a preliminary pool of the most qualified applicants to you. Using the results of our interviews, the application, supplemental responses (if applied), resume, and any other materials submitted by candidates, we partner with you to identify the top semi-finalists. We then organize a work session with you to provide the opportunity to: Assess the quality of the candidate responses to supplemental questions. Gain initial familiarity with the semi-finalists. Institute a quality control checkpoint to evaluate the results of the recruitment. Control the expenses involved in the travel/interview phase of the search. Should you choose, Waldron & Company can eliminate this work session and narrow the candidate field to semi-finalists prior to involving you directly in the screening phase. After semi-finalists have been identified, the project team from Waldron & Company will conduct personal interviews with the semi- finalist group. Final Interview Process Following Waldron & Company's interviews with semi-finalists, we will meet with you to present our findings. Depending on the candidate pool, we will recommend three to five candidates for your consideration as finalists. In preparation for final interviews we will: Work closely with you to design the final interview process. Conduct in-depth, professional references at appropriate times on each of the finalists that include supervisors, peers, and subordinates. Confirm all academic credentials and employment history for each finalist. Prior to final interviews, we will deliver a written report that includes the application, candidate answers to supplemental questions (if used), resume, preliminary reference reports, and education verifications for each candidate. In addition, we provide our clients with: A list of suggested interview questions designed to augment questions that participants may wish to ask. A quantitative/qualitative scoring system to evaluate and compare the merits of each candidate (if desired). Assistance in making the needed travel arrangements (if any) for the final interviews and facility tours. Access to the Waldron & Company project team to act as facilitators during the finalists' interviews. Waldron will facilitate the selection of finalists and will coordinate with you to refine the candidate pool to result in an offer being made to the most desirable candidate. While it is Waldron & Company's policy not to negotiate the final offer with the selected candidate, the Waldron Project Team will continue to serve as on -call advisors until a final selection is made and an employment agreement is reached. Fees & Expenses: Professional Services Fee: Waldron & Company's fee for professional services is 20% of the successful candidate's starting salary. Expenses: Costs incurred for conducting the search are at the expense of the client. Waldron & Company will pre -approve all significant expenditures with you and maintain accurate records at all times. Expenses will include, but may not be limited to: Newspaper, trade journals, and related advertising to announce the position. Direct mail announcements and regret letters. Travel and related costs for the consultants assigned to the project. Photocopying and printing of documents and materials. Facsimile and telephone expense. Delivery expenses. • Travel, lodging, meals and related expenses for candidates during the interview process. A two percent (2%) charge will be added to all pass -through expenses referenced above. This reflects Waldron and Company's B&O tax obligations to City and State departments of revenue. Billing: Professional fees and expenses are billed in three equal installments during the course of the search. The initial installment is billed at the time Waldron & Company is engaged. The second installment is billed when semi-finalists are selected. The final installment is billed at the conclusion of the search. Expenses are billed monthly. All invoices are due upon receipt by the client. Guarantee: Waldron & Company guarantees placement of a qualified candidate. Waldron & Company will provide a one-year search guarantee of the selected individual. If the selected individual leaves the position for any reason other than death, physical or mental incapacity or termination initiated by the client without cause, we will conduct a replacement search with no additional service fee. The only cost to the client would be pass -through expenses related to the additional search. Within the guaranty period, Waldron must be notified in writing of a termination within 30-days of its occurrence. Cancellation: You have the right to cancel the search at any time. Your only obligation to Waldron & Company would be the fees and expenses incurred prior to cancellation. ACCEPTED BY: Waldron & Company Mr. Ed Rogan Executive Search Practice Leader City of Medina Mr. Miles Adam Mayor Date Date Hiring and Evaluating the Chief Administrator several final arrangements must be completed. These include negotiating a compensation package and completing transition activities. If you have contracted with a professional recruiting firm, it can assist you with this part of the process. If the council is doing the recruiting directly, one member of the council should be chosen to conduct the employment negotiations with the successful candidate. That council member should serve as the liaison with the balance of the council throughout the nego- tiating process. When negotiating compensation, start with the base salary. Additional compensation factors include deferred compensation, severance pay, a car allowance or use of a government vehicle, a retirement plan, medical and other insurance, vacation, holidays, sick leave, membership dues, and conference fees. Before the negotiation begins, the council or com- mission should ask the candidate to provide a written itemization of cur- rent total compensation, along with a copy of a current employment agreement, if one exists. Negotiating implies a willingness on the part of both parties to con- sider options and alternatives that will result in an acceptable package. The council member conducting the negotiation should keep the follow- ing questions in mind: • What salary will be acceptable to the governing body? What is the present salary of the applicant? Remember, no matter how beautiful or desirable the community or position may be, no one (except in highly unusual circumstances) will accept a new position without an increase in compensation. • During the initial interviews, what type of salary and total compensa- tion package did the candidate discuss? • Moving expenses, a temporary housing allowance, house -hunting and temporary commuting expenses until the manager's family can relo- cate, and housing financing assistance are additional items that are often raised during negotiations. What options will the council or com- mission find acceptable? Be prepared for the possibility that you will be unable to reach agree- ment on compensation or other matters with the first -choice candidate. In such instances, the local government typically enters into negotiations with its second choice. As indicated previously, once an agreement has been reached, all other applicants should be promptly notified. Employment agreements After the local government and the new administrator have reached agree- ment, ICMA recommends a written summary of the terms and conditions of employment to which both parties have agreed. City and county man- agers know that the governing bodies for which they work must be able to 45 46 Setting Goals for Action dismiss a manager for their own reasons at any time. They know that because political leadership and community needs change, they must live with a relatively low level of job security. But they also know that the nature of their chosen profession makes finding a new job time-consum- ing. Being able to undertake that search with some financial security is important for the manager —and being able to sever relationships with as little rancor as possible is important for both the community and the manager. Most employment agreements, therefore, permit either the lo- cal government or the administrator to terminate the relationship. How- ever, these agreements generally include a section providing the administrator with severance pay for a fixed period of time if his or her service is terminated by the local government. Below is a list of items that typically are found in employment agreements. An employment agreement offers advantages to both the administra- tor and the governing body. For the governing body, the primary advan- tages are that the agreement enhances recruiting capabilities by providing a method to grant the chief administrative officer greater benefits than are accorded to other employees, allows for more amicable termination and smoother transitions between managers, and attracts better qualified candidates. For the manager, the agreement provides enhanced financial stability, sets down precise terms, increases organizational strength, and allows the manager to take stronger positions on issues. The most common format for employment agreements is a formal document with "articles," "sections," etc. Depending on local law and circumstances, other formats may be used, such as a detailed letter from the mayor to the candidate, offering the position and setting forth the conditions of employment. The agreement takes effect upon acceptance by the candidate, established by his or her signature on the letter. Some jurisdictions use a simple "memorandum of understanding." This format lists the basic terms of employment. Also, the terms of the Common Elements of an Employment Agreement duties terms of the agreement salary hours of work automobile or car allowance moving expenses home sale and purchase expenses termination notice severance pay performance evaluation procedure and criteria dues and subscriptions professional development general expenses civic club memberships vacation leave military reserve leave sick leave indemnification disability insurance health insurance life insurance deferred compensation and retirement programs other fringe benefits general provisions contract execution provisions Hiring and Evaluating the Chief Administrator 47 agreement, including performance standards, can be incorporated in a resolution of understanding enacted by the governing body. Transition activities To effect a smooth transition, the local government should offer whatever general assistance the new administrator might need in moving. Such assistance might include introductions to realtors and bankers and assis- tance to the spouse in finding suitable employment. Once the new manager arrives, the elected officials should arrange a special meeting or reception to introduce the new administrator formally to department heads and local government staff. Similar meetings, briefing sessions, and receptions can be arranged to introduce the new adminis- trator and his or her family to community groups, civic leaders, and citi- zens in general. A work session to review objectives should be scheduled early on. This will clarify initial expectations on both sides and offer an opportu- nity to discuss the manager's goals and objectives. Good communication from the outset can help ensure a smooth working relationship. Regular review and updating of these goals and objectives, in the form of an an- nual or semiannual performance review, helps to ensure that this com- munication is maintained. Evaluating the Chief Administrator Evaluation is a communications process —a time for discussion apart from formal decision making. Despite the close working relationship between the administrator and the governing body, opportunities for frank and personal discussion are rare. Evaluation is such an opportunity. Evaluation is also a learning process. By doing regular evaluations, you can learn more about what everyone is doing, what everyone expects from one another, and where there are strengths (or weaknesses) in the relationship. Evaluation provides an outlet —a regular forum for airing issues, problems, needs, concerns, frustrations, and anxieties. If you are dissatisfied with the way your administrator handled a certain issue, an evaluation gives you a chance to air that dissatisfaction and determine whether it was the issue or the administrator that really bothered you. An evaluator probably has to be a little more magnanimous and a little less self-serving than the person being evaluated. A good evaluation pointing up the administrator's strengths and weaknesses can be benefi- cial on both sides. It will help you to step back and look objectively at what you like and don't like about the administrator's performance, and to tell him or her directly. It can also help you in your role as the administrator's employer. A good employer needs to know if an employee is satisfied with the job, the working conditions, the resources available, and the challenges. A good employer owes an employee regular feed- back —whether a reprimand or a pat on the back. In your policy -making role, an evaluation can help you meet your goals by enabling you and the administrator to discuss the goals you are 48 Setting Goals for Action trying to achieve, what has gone right, what has gone wrong, and what just hasn't gone on. Evaluation provides the opportunity to appraise the administrator's relationships with the public and the staff and to discuss how well the organization is being managed. Evaluation is a difficult and sometimes time-consuming process. But, by forcing you to revisit your expectations and needs in terms of the administrator's performance, it can help you determine how you are doing as an elected official —what you are contributing to the organization and how you might improve your own performance. For that reason, you benefit more from the evaluation if it is a two-way process in which the governing body evaluates the administrator and the administrator evaluates the governing body. That way you can get the kind of feedback you need to strengthen yourself. Are you articulating your needs, concerns, and interests clearly and effectively? Are you giving the administrator the kind of policy leadership needed for the day-to-day business of running the local government? Are you getting too involved in day-to-day administrative business? Your administrator is in a good position to help you evaluate how well you and your fellow elected offi- cials are doing as a policy -making body. Then, after the evaluation, you and the administrator will be able to improve the way you do your respec- tive jobs. Another beneficial element of the evaluation process is the chance it gives the governing body to evaluate itself. It can be useful to develop a list of questions that are appropriate for your governing body and discuss how you work together effectively, and what you want to do differently. Pages 50 and 51 provide a list of sample questions you may find helpful. Some basic evaluation principles There's no magic to carrying out an evaluation; there are many systems, formats, approaches, criteria, and designs. What works for you is what's acceptable. Below are some basic principles to help you think through the evaluation process. Set expectations ahead of time. Evaluations are most effective if all parties understand what is expected of them ahead of time. You should not expect your chief administrator to do a good job if he or she does not understand what "good job" means to you. A written list of what the council expects in the way of performance from the chief administrator is the best way to do this. Using the goals and objectives the council has previously set, the council and the chief administrator should develop a set of specific expectations for the administrator. This can be done at the beginning of each evaluation period. That way, when it comes time to evaluate your administrator six months or a year hence, you will have something to measure against. Define the purpose. At different points in time, evaluations have dif- ferent purposes. Different members of a governing board may have vary- ing ideas about the purpose of the evaluation. Clarify purposes up front so that the end results match your intent. Are you evaluating strictly to see if a raise in pay is appropriate? Or are you trying to improve the work- Hiring and Evaluating the Chief Administrator ing relationship between the administrator and the governing body? Do you want the manager to think about the strengths or weaknesses he or she will bring (or has brought) to specific projects, upcoming or just past? Evaluation should begin with mutual agreement and acceptance, so you will want to work together on what will be evaluated and how you plan to do it. Agree to a schedule. Once you decide to initiate an evaluation pro- cess, make it regular. A one-shot evaluation is threatening and ineffec- tive. Regular does not mean stiff and formal; it means you evaluate periodically, at agreed -upon intervals. Doing so can help you avoid crisis confrontations with your administrator. If there are serious conflicts, you will know about them and together you can find a way to handle them. Keep in mind that just before an election or just after, when some of the elected officials have not had a chance to work with the administrator and form an opinion, is a bad time for an evaluation. The frequency of evaluations will vary depending on how long you have worked with your administrator, what kinds of issues are being faced by your community, and changes in the composition of the council or commission. Annual reviews are common; a year gives you and the ad- ministrator enough time to make changes and then evaluate the results, and it helps you avoid focusing on particular crises. Some communities feel that semiannual reviews are more useful because they keep the com- munication process going more regularly. It is wise to schedule reviews more frequently —perhaps even quarterly —if you are having trouble com- municating. Otherwise, you might find yourself letting the evaluation pro- cess slide. The schedule should make sense in the context of your annual workload. An evaluation should not be an isolated interruption, but an integral part of everything that is going on. When you are developing an evaluation process, think about the way you do things. The evaluation might easily and appropriately become part of an annual retreat where you hammer out council or commission goals and objectives. Many gov- erning bodies find annual review of the chief administrator easiest to address in the context of the budget cycle, since that is when they work most closely with the manager. But when you talk money and perfor- mance during the budget cycle, you also will be thinking about tax in- creases, budget constraints, and other financial concerns. You run the risk of making evaluation a negotiating process rather than a communi- cation process. For that reason, it can be more effective, particularly when starting out, to separate the evaluation from salary issues. Finally, once you have decided when in the year to schedule evalua- tions and have scheduled your first review, pick an appropriate place and set aside enough time to talk things through. An office, a conference room, or the governing body's chambers are good evaluation sites; a noisy res- taurant is neither private nor comfortable. Make sure there will be no interruptions from the outside and that no one feels rushed or threatened. In addition, be sure everyone understands 49 50 Governing Body Evaluation Questions There are no right or wrong answers to these questions. These, or similar questions designed to fit your govem- ing body's needs, can provide a point of departure for a discussion of how effectively you have worked together. Comparisons of how responses change over time can help you assess progress toward goals the group has set for itself. Goal setting Are established council goals realistic within the time frame stated? I __l Almost always ❑ Sometimes ❑ Never Do council members participate suffi- ciently in the implementation of goals once they are established? U Almost always ❑ Sometimes ❑ Never Is the public adequately informed about council goals? 0 Almost always IJ Sometimes ❑ Never Policy making Are council positions and policies effectively communicated? Almost always ❑ Sometimes ❑ Never Does the council make hard choices and politically unpopular decisions when necessary? LJ Almost always ❑ Sometimes ❑ Never Budgeting Does the council clearly understand the local government's financial re- sources and make sound decisions when establishing priorities for public spending? Setting Goals for Action Almost always ' Sometimes I Never Is broad public participation in the bud- geting process adequately encouraged? ❑ Almost always Sometimes Never Does the council avoid unbudgeted appropriations? r 1 Almost always LJ Sometimes Cl Never Does the council consider the budget "its budget" as opposed to thinking of it as the "staff's budget"? LJ Almost always ❑ Sometimes LJ Never Council meetings Does the council encourage adequate public input at council meetings? L I Almost always LJ Sometimes ❑ Never Does each council member effectively participate in council meetings? LJ Almost always ❑ Sometimes ❑ Never Does the staff have adequate oppor- tunity for input before the council makes its decision on an issue? ❑ Almost always Sometimes ❑ Never Is the direction given to staff clear and concise? ❑ Almost always ❑ Sometimes C Never Advisory committees Are committee members selected on the basis of ability to serve the com- munity rather than on the basis of personal friendships? Hiring and Evaluating the Chief Administrator Almost always ❑ Sometimes ❑ Never Does the council place enough em- phasis on balancing committee mem- bership to ensure that the total community is represented? ❑ Almost always ❑ Sometimes ❑ Never Does the council give appropriate weight to committee recommendations? 7 Almost always ❑ Sometimes ❑ Never Council relationships Allowing for differences of philosophy or opinions on given issues, do coun- cil members respect one another's opinions? ❑ Almost always L� Sometimes ❑ Never Does the council function as a team? f :J Almost always LI Sometimes Never Do council members deal with issues openly? Almost always ❑ Sometimes ❑ Never Do individual council members exces- sively politicize the public process? Almost always ❑ Sometimes Never Do council members' attitudes and actions reflect a sense of public ser• vice rather than personal interest? Almost always Sometimes _J Never Relationship with the local government administrator Is the relationship between council members and the local -government administrator open and honest? ❑ Almost always Sometimes ❑ Never Does the council function as a unit in giving direction to the local -govern- ment administrator? ❑ Almost always C Sometimes ❑ Never Is there mutual respect between the council and the local -government administrator? 17 Almost always ❑i Sometimes Ll Never Is there adequate opportunity for the local-govemment administrator to offer input into the decision -making process? L� Almost always I.l Sometimes ❑ Never Relationship with staff Does the council provide a reasonable time frame for staff to accomplish assignments? ❑ Almost always Sometimes Ci Never Does the council take the impact on staff time into consideration when changing its priorities? rJ Almost always CI Sometimes ❑ Never Does the council give adequate con- sideration to staff recommendations? Almost always L. Sometimes ❑ Never Do council members use the estab- lished chain of command when dealing with administrative issues? ❑ Almost always ❑ Sometimes ❑ Never 52 Setting Goals for Action that what is said is confidential or at least will be handled with discretion. Deciding in advance what the public will be told about the discussion will help everyone feel comfortable about talking openly. Use objective criteria. If your criteria are well thought out and posi- tive, you will end up with a positive and effective evaluation. Identify skills, achievements, and results and evaluate every dimension of your chief administrator's work. Three major areas to consider are the know( - edge the manager brings to the job, the way he or she interacts with others, and his or her ability to make things happen. Think about your expectations for those tasks, and expand those expectations into criteria. Be open and constructive. When you are evaluating, talk openly. Look for the strong points, and state them. When you raise weaknesses, focus on what can be done to eliminate them. Try not to waste time on areas the administrator cannot do much about —such as basic aspects of his or her personality. At all costs, both you and the administrator should avoid going on the defensive or turning the evaluation into a gripe ses- sion. Talk, share, be open, be positive. Evaluation can give the adminis- trator more confidence. After a good evaluation he or she will have a clearer idea of what the governing body wants. If the evaluation points up problems or weaknesses, the administrator knows where you stand and why. Specify goats and action steps. Follow-through is critical to the success of evaluation. Plan what is to happen after the evaluation. This may be the accomplishment of specific tasks, but there should also be objectives that will help the administrator grow professionally and per- sonally. Then, when you come to the next evaluation, you will be able to gauge progress. Evaluations should lead to change. Even if nothing is wrong, think about specific ways to make strong points better and to develop new skills. Use the entire council. Because of the press of other duties it is sometimes tempting to appoint a committee to evaluate the chief execu- tive. This temptation should be avoided, however. The periodic evalua- tion is the one time when the chief executive can get performance feedback from all members of the legislative body. Although using a com- mittee may save time, it may give the chief executive a distorted picture of how the legislative body as a whole views his or her performance. It is better to take the time to transmit clearly the approval or disapproval of all council members than to risk a misunderstanding in this important area. Some ideas for the evaluation process With the basic principles of an effective evaluation firmly in mind, and agreement on the roles participants will play, you already have many of the tools you will need to get the process started. If you have not had much experience with evaluating the chief administrator, or if you are starting to work with a new administrator, or if there are several new council or commission members, you may find a retreat a good way to Hiring and Evaluating the Chief Administrator brainstorm about goals and objectives and relate them to the performance expectations for the local government as a whole and the manager in particular. A retreat setting, away from ringing telephones, interruptions, and the daily routine, creates an environment that will help you focus. One of the first steps you will want to take as you begin the evaluation is to develop an "evaluation instrument" —written guidelines or criteria. This might be a list of general questions you will use to guide the discus- sion, or it could be a detailed list of criteria that defines management duties as the administrator and the council or commission see them. Developing criteria is not easy. Ideally, criteria for the administrator's job should reflect the goals and objectives of the governing body and staff. If you already have some clearly defined goals and objectives for the government as a whole, the governing body also has what it needs to evaluate its administrator and itself. How effectively has the administra- tor worked to achieve those goals? Which goals have not been accom- plished? Why not? What activities took the most time, and how do they relate to the goals? If you do not have in hand a list of goals and objectives of the govern- ing body, or an employment agreement that specifies the manager's goals and objectives, develop some guidelines before tackling evaluation. The most effective criteria are framed in terms of measurable results — what should have been achieved. Since the job of chief administrator in local government involves a range of duties that can vary widely from community to community, there are no standard criteria. But there are general areas of expertise that you can use as a starting point in thinking about appropriate measures of your chief administrator's performance: • Ability to plan, anticipate needs, recognize potential problems, and work with the council or commission to plan strategy in advance of decisions • Organizational skills necessary to run the day-to-day business, hire and motivate staff, ensure that effective work procedures are devel- oped and implemented, and manage the physical facilities of the gov- ernment • Financial management skills necessary to develop and manage the budget, present long-term needs effectively, and recommend alterna- tives for budget modifications objectively • Program development skills necessary to design and carry out pro- grams that meet new policy directives • Knowledge and skills necessary to work cooperatively with other area governments and ensure that the local government develops appro- priate relationships with state and federal officials • Communication and interpersonal skills necessary to develop effec- tive relationships with the governing body, the public, and the staff 53 54 Setting Goals for Action • Attention to professional and personal development, so that new skills are developed, and existing skills are improved Awareness of personal style and its effect on relationships and job proficiency • Ability to be flexible, to manage conflict, to handle crises, and to ad- just to varying pressures. Each council or commission member should separately develop evalu- ation criteria; the administrator should do the same. Then you can look for common criteria and discuss differences until you reach an agree- ment. As you look at performance, you may find it appropriate to explain to the public what you're doing and why. You will want citizens' support for the process. Most of your dealings with the public on performance evalu- ation will probably be through the media. They set the tone for how the evaluation will be viewed by the public, so keep reporters informed. The more they know about the concept of evaluation and the more informa- tion they have on the measures or criteria to be used, the more likely they are to agree that the evaluation discussion is best conducted in private. After the evaluation, let the public and the press know what har- pened. This does not mean providing a play by play of everything that i discussed. It means simply telling them in broad terms what you decidt, to do —keep going in the same direction, make a few changes in some specified areas, or take some other course. When looking for the right approach, start simply. A long and detailed evaluation instrument and a grueling follow-up discussion can discour- age everyone before anything positive happens. A simple start might mean considering the pros and cons and defining the purpose and steps of the evaluation. If you use this approach, you might want to follow up in six months and adjust the definitions at that time. Then, you may decide that annual performance evaluations are appropriate. There are two more issues you will want to consider before you sit down to do the evaluation: how you will manage the discussion and how you will record the results. In many communities, the criteria that are developed are used as a discussion tool to start the process. But the evaluation might not be limited to just those areas. Some communities develop a rating system to use with the criteria. For each area, individual members of the governing body rate the administrator's performance either on a numerical scale or as satisfactory/unsatisfactory. A section for additional written comments is useful with either type of rating. Then, all the forms are compiled to de- velop an overall picture of the administrator's performance. Probably the most effective approach is a combination —to develop written evaluations and then follow that with a general discussion. Some- times a freewheeling, unrecorded discussion can degenerate into "you said," "but I thought you meant," and "didn't we agree?" after the evalu- Hiring and Evaluating the Chief Administrator ation. By beginning with written evaluations, the members of the govern- ing body and the manager have a point of reference that can be used to help clarify discussion. Once you have developed your criteria, decided on a process, and found the right setting, what actually happens at an evaluation discus- sion? At its best there will be a lot of discussion —much give and take. To make it work, however, the mayor or president of the governing body probably should serve as a discussion leader. That way you will have some guidance or leadership to make sure the discussion goes somewhere. The success of your discussion will depend a lot on how comfortable you are with each other and with your process. It might take a little time before everyone opens up and talks freely. You also might consider using an outside facilitator —a sort of modera- tor —to make sure the important issues are covered while minimizing the development of negative feelings. This approach is most beneficial when a communication gap is impeding evaluation. As was noted earlier, the real success of an evaluation comes in what happens after .it is done. You might come up with a work plan for the period before the next evaluation, or a development program to strengthen the manager's weak points and make the best of strengths. Or you might decide that a team -building program is what's needed. Be sure your evalu- ation includes action steps —changes to be made, special tasks to be done, or decisions to follow-up on as a result of the evaluation. Regular evaluation will not eliminate all conflicts, but it will help you keep those conflicts in perspective. Most important, it will give you a means of dealing with conflict effectively. Evaluation gives you a chance to talk about what has been done, what should have been done, and what you would like to see done. Without it, you do not have many chances to talk about things in general —you're always facing so many major deci- sions and specific issues. There have not been many postevaluation casualties. In fact, most administrators and governing bodies who have gone through the process say they felt better when it was over, and that their relationships worked better. The key is to think positively and design an evaluation system directed toward positive results. Further Reading Employment Agreements for Managers: Guidelines for Elected Qfjicials. ICMA, 1985. Provides discussion of common elements of employment agreements. Guidelines for Selecting a Local Government Administrator. ICMA, 1987. Provides discussion of how to take a systematic approach to the process of recruiting and hiring a local government administrator. 4R ITEM J-4 Medina Store Historical Use Permit Application EXHIBIT ITEMS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL November 5, 2006 To: Joseph Gellings and/or Rebecca Leslie From: Jim Lawrence Subject: HUP 2006-1 Wayne Tanaka's letter on Code Interpretation on "Materially Detrimental" Joseph (or Rebecca in Joseph's absence): There appears to be a lot of input on the green Store issue from many sources, so I am adding to the input that the City seems to have solicited, including comments from individual Planning Commission members. I could make this comment at the November 13th hearing but I thought I would submit it now so that the Applicant has a chance to see it before the meeting. As I reviewed the package of materials you provided us regarding the HUP 2006-1, the one issue that keeps coming up from various PC members is how to interpret "Material Detrimental" in the Code, since an HUP may only be granted if it is shown not to be materially detrimental to the neighboring properties. As the PC and now the Council grapples with how to interpret materially detrimental, everyone applies his or her experience and knowledge to reach his or her interpretation. I thought I should share a real life experience that might help with the interpretation of materially detrimental. In his memo on the subject, Wayne Tanaka stated "Thus, if there is evidence from a qualified source that the excessive noise from the proposal will lower property values of the next door neighbor by 10%, this is a materially detrimental effect." In late 20011 appealed my property tax assessment, which I thought was too high, on the grounds that the King County Assessor did not take into account that I live next door to the Post Office and that the traffic from the Post Office had a negative impact on my property value. After a review of my appeal, the Assessor agreed with me that the traffic negatively impacted the assessment and concluded "the subject is next to the Post Office and is impacted by more, than usual traffic volume ". The Assessor recommended a reduction in my assessed value of 9.53%. The applicant's traffic engineer in HUP 2006-1, Chris Brown, states the additional traffic generated from HUP 2006-1 is equal to the existing Post Office traffic. Please see that the City Council gets a copy of this memo. I have enclosed a copy of the order from the King County Board of Equalization. Jim Lawrence CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING A HISTORIC USE PERMIT REVISION FOR THE MEDINA GREEN STORE, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS. WHEREAS, Mrs. Hae Lee is owner of the Medina Green Store located on Evergreen Point Drive and NE 8th, and WHEREAS, Mrs. Lee has applied for a revision to her historic use permit for the Green Store to allow expanded retail use, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an open record hearing to consider the application and has made a recommendation to the City Council and adopted findings of fact and conclusions and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Planning Commission's recommendation at the November 13, 2006 City Council meeting, now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that: 1. The application for revision to the historic use permit is approved subject to the conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. The findings of fact and conclusions adopted by the Planning Commission are hereby adopted by the City Council PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF , 2006, AND SIGNED IN AUTHENTICATION OF ITS PASSAGE ON THE DAY OF , 2006. Miles Adam, Mayor Approved as to form: Wayne D. Tanaka, City Attorney Attest: Rachel Baker, City Clerk {W DT645294. DOC;1 /00093.900000/1 co ,.Nl A b u tC ra), N N O — O -a— c E E CL E� _ cx E E U C) U �j U U U U CD c 4) er '� ca c oco co co U o = = L cn 7 c Q 0 0 w o a(D) a�i a�i a�i cam) c m c c D c (D a) c COD c N ti a O U Q)Cl p O U O U E o c 0a)0 O C a�i ai 0 0 0 °� c 0 0 _ cu '' U Q O U Q O U cx Q _ E cu c c o _ L. VL CD :Ec OLcn cm _O „c0 C 0 O CD > c E c c //L� co -a •(� O a) 0.c a a0ow � , U L'" � a) v��0 L to C 0m U � cu t= a) a_ .� a) Cl) a�L= J m E °� E = N L d) a% N a) co Q) U a) N O :, 0 U a) L- U) E-a L N Q w U X c a) L a) Q Uj cm L z O co O J Q ns LL co C C a) m ,r U) C O M U O d to a) N c CO N39: 1 d = O — co C c° O d co � O U O U 0 z co U) cv o cu 0 d~ E a) o 0 1 0 L m I- r- � N U c=� aCL U E l m L O C C 00 U C m �= O O� c LO > Q O O to G co U C C O LLI C i V c F- N= NCV<(QooUUUU0_mYY J;2zz0aaazU) U)CO — �o�o O O O N co Cl T U O c0 c a) U cu a c a) Q U c 0 U co O Cl N E a) co O O N M T CD Y U //� cu Q- ca c m Q t0 O O 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION POLICE DEPARTMENT SALARIES & WAGES 001 000 000 521 20 11 00 Salaries & Wages 001 000 000 521 20 12 00 Overtime 001 000 000 521 20 12 01 Merit Pay 001 000 000 521 20 13 00 Holiday Pay TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES City of Medina MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT October 31, 2006 M.T.D. Y.T.D. EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED PERSONNEL BENEFITS 001 000 000 521 20 21 00 Personnel Benefits 001 000 000 521 20 21 10 Personnel Benefits -Retirees 001 000 000 521 20 22 00 Uniforms 001 000 000 521 20 23 00 Tuition TOTAL PERSONNEL BENEFITS SUPPLIES 001 000 000 521 20 31 00 Office Supplies 001 000 000 521 20 31 40 Police Operating Supplies 001 000 000 521 20 31 50 Photographic Supplies 001 000 000 521 20 31 60 Ammo/Range (Targets, etc.) 001 000 000 521 20 32 00 Vehicle Expenses -gas, car wash 001 000 000 521 20 35 20 Firearms (purchase & repair) TOTAL SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 001 000 000 521 20 41 00 Professional Services 001 000 000 521 20 41 50 Recruitment -Background 001 000 000 521 20 42 00 Communications (Phone,Pagers) 001 000'000 521 20 43 00 Travel & Training 001 000 000 521 20 44 50 Recruitment -Advertising 001 000 000 521 20 45 00 Equipment -Lease & Rentals 001 000 000 521 20 48 00 Repairs & Maint-Equipment 001 000 000 521 20 48 10 Repairs & Maint-Automobiles 001 000 000 521 20 49 00 Misc. (Service/supplies) 001 000 000 521 20 49 20 Bicycle Patrol 001 000 000 521 20 49 30 Animal Control 001 000 000 521 20 49 40 Dues,Subcriptions,Memberships 001 000 000 521 20 49 60 Crime Prevention/Public Educ 001 000 000 521 20 49 90 Misc-Investigative Fund 001 000 000 521 20 49 95 Criminal Investigation TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES PAGE 6 % OF UNEXPENDED TOTAL BALANCE 00 498,035.00 673,882.00 73.91 175,847.00 00 61,932.56 75,000.00 82.58 13,067.44 00 23,908.40 42,132.00 56.75 18,223,60 00 960.00 20,889.00 4.60 19,929.00 00 584,835.96 811,903.00 72.03 227,067.04 00 160,743.42 211,500.00 76.00 50,756.58 00 34,128.93 40,600.00 84.06 6,471.07 00 8,926.37 18,000.00 49.59 9,073.63 00 .00 6,000.00 .00 6,000.00 00 203,798.72 276,100.00 73.81 72,301.28 00 2,565.99 5,000.00 51.32 2,434.01 00 1,869.57 5,600.00 33.39 3,730.43 00 .00 300.00 .00 300.00 00 902.59 4,405.00 20.49 3,502.41 00 26,015.84 25,000.00 104.06 1,015.84- 00 1,523.50 1,000.00 152.35 523.50- 00 32,877.49 41,305.00 79.60 8,427.51 00 10,229.60 11,000.00 93.00 770.40 00 1,829.25 6,500.00 28.14 4,670.75 00 11,412.00 16,000.00 71.33 4,588.00 00 6,388.93 18,000.00 35.49 11,611.07 00 .00 1,000.00 .00 11000.00 00 2,402.93 2,600.00 92.42 197.07 00 10,828.28 25,000.00 43.31 14,171.72 00 4,746.65 10,000.00 47.47 5,253.35 00 151.58 500.00 30.32 348.42 00 2,030.64 1,000.00 203.06 1,030.64- 00 .00 1,200.00 .00 1,200.00 00 2,044.00 2,500.00 81,76 456.00 00 975.86 3,000.00 32.53 2,024.14 00 .00 500.00 .00 500.00 00 975.12 .00 .00 975.12- 00 54,014.84 98,800.00 54.67 44,785.16 Laura Bolin 2433 78'h Ave NE Medina, WA 98039 November 9, 2006 Medina City Council 501 Evergreen Point Rd. Medina, WA 98039 Dear Medina City Council, I would like to thank you for addressing the nonconforming envelope issue at the last City Council meeting. The Planning commission's proposal was a step in the right direction and I look forward to their revised recommendation. My husband and I are hoping that the nonconforming envelope issue can be resolved before the end of the year. The City Council indicated during the October 9 meeting that they would like to settle the issue before the end of the 2006. (You'll recall that it has been under consideration since 2004). Unfortunately, the issue does not appear on the City Council's calendar, as posted on Medina's city website, so we are asking that this issue be included for a decision during the November 27 meeting. As we mentioned to the Council, our personal goal is to modestly update our home while maintaining a footprint and volume suitable to our lot and character of our neighborhood. By modest, I mean that our home is 1,450 sq. ft. and we would like to add approx. 300 sq ft. We are far smaller than most of Medina's homes and only ask to create an attractive update. Without relief from the 1 Oft side setback it is not possible to construct a seamless update on an 8,000 sq ft lot. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your attention to this matter on November 27. Respectfully yours, Laura Bolin cc: Julie Campbell, AIA Joseph Gellings My name is Joe Meisenheimer and my family and I have lived at 2459 — 78"' Ave NE for the last 22 years. Seated behind me are my family, friends and neighbors. They have asked me to speak to an issue that is very important to all of us; the safety of our families, friends and fellow Medina residents. As all of you know, on September 29, 2006, at about 3:30 in the afternoon, a very tragic accident occurred on 78"' Avenue. Ethan Zilz, my neighbor, your fellow Medina resident and 3rd grader at Medina Elementary, was struck by a Puget Sound Energy truck. In the blink of an eye, lives were altered forever. I was the fourth or fifth person on the scene and I can tell you that most of you have never witnessed what I witnessed that afternoon. I initially observed two people struggling to restrain Ethan, a boy full of vitality, who wanted to remove himself from something very awful. I witnessed a leg that was severely mangled, pieces of bone and flesh and as I searched for his foot on the roadside and under the carriage of the PSE truck, I came to the stark reality that my efforts were futile. What I saw, I will never forget. Over the years, my family, neighbors and your fellow Medina residents have yelled at, chased and recorded license plates of motorists going too fast on 78th. What has contributed to this situation is easily identified. 78th Avenue is the only non -arterial road in Medina that is four blocks long with no intersecting streets, stop signs or obstacles designed to mitigate the speed of traffic. To exacerbate that situation, it is 22 feet wide with no sidewalk, and a line -of -sight that is obstructed by a change in elevation of approximately ten feet within the distance spanning two blocks. Two further compound this dangerous situation, I believe there are more homes within that four block section of 78th than any other equidistant section of roadway in Medina. It also has an unmarked crosswalk that is frequently used by pele walking to and from the Medina Indian Trail on undeveloped NE 26`h Street, from 79 Avenue NE to 77th Avenue NE (the Indian Trail). These people seated behind me respectfully request that you add this issue on to the next City Council agenda for remedial consideration and that you put it immediately into the "2007 budget and/or Capital Improvement Plan if appropriate", thereby earmarking funds so that you can work with the residents of 78th Avenue, your fellow residents and the people you have been empowered by the electoral process to protect, to resolve this issue so that no other parent has to endure what Ethan's parents have. Lastly, in light of all the print and television coverage this incident received, it is important for this community to demonstrate how we care for each other and our ability to react in a timely and effective manner. Together, let's think and work outside the box to resolve this matter as quickly as possible. Thank you very much for your time.